Rev. Franklin Graham, the son of Billy Graham and head of Samaritan’s Purse, seemed to be a fan of Donald Trump for the last couple months, writing posts on Facebook praising him for “shaking up” the GOP.
But now that Rev. Graham is finding out more about Trump’s positions, specifically his comments saying Kentucky clerk Kim Davis should obey the “law of the land” on same-sex marriage, he feels differently about the Donald:
[facebook url=”https://www.facebook.com/FranklinGraham/posts/1001622503227264″]Rev. Graham certainly holds a lot of sway with people of faith, so does this mark the beginning of the end of evangelicals’ flirt with Trump?
Thomas Valentine is a researcher for APIA and a junior at the Franciscan University of Steubenville.
6 comments
FonHollohan Here’s the thing about that – God’s Law being Above the Law of Man… it is incumbent on us as individuals to follow God’s Law, to bring ourselves in alignment with His will and laws. So either she needs to process the paperwork per her required duties under the definition of her job responsibilities (God requires even slaves to be faithful servants, even to evil masters) and pray for those who cross her path, Or ask to be transferred to another position which does not conflict with her personal religious beliefs, Or quit her government job (since the government as a whole is participating in this defiance of God’s law) and go into the private sector. Most true Disciples just don’t take or keep jobs which conflict with their faith. I don’t work on the Sabbath, so I could never do Retail or Entertainment. I don’t try to make others bend to my beliefs, but I won’t bend mine. Anything else would be trying to glorify myself.
@Tmoore She do take a oath to follow the law but God laws supercede the laws of Man..Any man or women of Faith should know that.
The writer of this article almost has a grasp on what he tried to write about. For instance, real people of faith can see right through a guy like Trump, so , no, he does not hold a lot of sway with real people of faith. And that he would title this piece, as not about Franklin Graham, who is responsible for assisting,aiding, and helping more people in a single day, than the writer has in his entire life…but the writer insists to title the story referring to him as “Billy Grahams son.”
Gay marriage is not law. The supreme court can not make law. The constitution is clear about the duties of the 3 branches of government. Anything not listed in the duties of the 3 branches, is left to the states and /or the citizens.
The people have repeatedly voted it down. Congress has never passed gay marriage.
The supreme court can’t make laws. Period
She can do her job. She took an oath to follow the law.
WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE ONCE IN PRACTICING TO DECEIVE. ……………………………….IT IS WRONG TO USE FAITH, WHEN SHE KNEW JUST WHAT SHE WAS DOING, SUCH A HYPOCRITE
SHE SURELY MADE SOME LOOK LIKE FOOLS. IN THE MANE OF FAITH…THAT WOMAN NEEDS TO DO SOME SOUL SEARCHING. ……………………………. The heat around gay marriage is obscuring what a simple distinction this actually is. But suppose the Rowan County Clerk was a devout Hindu
MORESurvivor Frontman is Outraged That Kim Davis Used ‘Eye of the Tiger’Ted Cruz to Visit Jailed Kentucky Clerk Kim DavisCaitlyn Jenner Says She Wasn’t Always In Favor of Gay MarriageSurvivor of TV Attack Plans Tribute for Slain Journalists NBC NewsMore Tests Needed to Determine Tyler Sash’s Death NBC NewsPilot Who Saved Burning Flight: ‘I’m Finished Flying’ NBC NewsKim Davis, clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, was remanded to jail by a federal judge on Thursday for her continued refusal to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. She says to do so would violate her religious beliefs and—as her lawyers put it—“substantially burden” her First Amendment freedom of religion.
Either Davis wants to go to jail for her faith, or she should get a new lawyer, because that argument seriously confuses the line between her rights as a citizen and her role as a public official.
As a citizen protected by the First Amendment, Davis is absolutely free to believe that homosexuality is “a Heaven or Hell decision.” In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2011—a case involving the late provocateur Fred Phelps—that she is free to chant hateful anti-gay slogans at military funerals if she wishes. She can’t be forced to attend a same-sex wedding, to participate in one, or to send a gift to the happy couple.
But the First Amendment does not give her the power to decide whether same sex marriages are lawful in the State of Kentucky. That question was settled this summer by the Supreme Court, which ruled 5-to-4 that the U.S. Constitution guarantees the freedom to marry in all 50 states.
Davis has said that she “never sought to be in this position,” with her faith telling her to ignore the law. But in fact, she did seek it—last year, when she ran for the office. Under Kentucky law, county clerks are responsible for certifying that applicants for a marriage license have met the legal requirements to wed. Are they both freely consenting and over 18? If younger, do they have permission from parents or guardians? Have they paid the licensing fee? And so on.
These requirements apply equally to same sex couples, and once they are met, the job of the county clerk is to issue a license—regardless of whether she personally believes the pair should get married.
The heat around same-sex marriage is obscuring what a simple distinction this actually is. But suppose the Rowan County Clerk was a devout Hindu. It would not be permissible to force her to eat beef at an office function, for that would violate the Hindu taboo on harming cows. But that official would not be allowed to refuse to issue a marriage license to a couple with plans to serve beef at their wedding reception, nor could a Hindu official deny a construction permit just because the building is intended to be a steakhouse.
Another public official’s faith might countenance arranged marriages of children. The First Amendment would protect her freedom to believe that such marriages are culturally appropriate. But she would not be permitted to act on that belief by issuing a marriage license to a child.
A Quaker pacifist who serves as a county clerk has a right to believe that war is an immoral violation of the Biblical commandment against killing. But that doesn’t mean that she could refuse to issue a marriage license to a soldier or a Marine.
In short, Davis’s private, personal beliefs are covered by the First Amendment. But when she steps into her official role, she is no longer a private citizen—she is now an agent of the government. And the same First Amendment that protects her private freedom of religion bars the government from having any official religious beliefs.
Davis has tried to wriggle out of her dilemma by refusing to issue any marriage licenses at all. But that’s another way of saying that she doesn’t want to do her job. It’s not as if she has been conscripted into service. A number of other candidates also wanted the job when Davis ran in 2014.
The solution for Kim Davis is simple—though she may find it painful. Resign as Rowan County Clerk. Then, if she wants to, she can write letters to the editor or march wearing a sandwich board or troll the Internet or shout from the rooftops to express her views on same sex marriage. Meanwhile, her fellow citizens can get on with their constitutionally protected lives.
PORTRAITS OF THE GAY MARRIAGE REVOLUTION.
Comments are closed.