Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Data: Corporate DEI Roles Declining Amid Trump Admin Pressure.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A recent study reveals a 13 percent reduction in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) jobs in the U.S., with 2,600 positions eliminated.

👥 Who’s Involved: Revelio Labs conducted the analysis; President Donald J. Trump and his Department of Justice (DOJ) are pushing back against DEI practices.

📍 Where & When: The data covers the growth and now accelerating decline of DEI jobs since 2016.

💬 Key Quote: “I’m hopeful and encouraged that Harmeet will drop the hammer on these companies,” says Will Hild, Executive Director of Consumers’ Research, referring to Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the civil rights division at the DOJ.

⚠️ Impact: While DEI job numbers remain above 2016 levels, they are rapidly falling from their peak. This suggests that Trump’s White House efforts to crack down on discriminatory DEI policies are working and reversing the course of corporate policies.

IN FULL:

A new analysis by Revelio Labs reveals a significant decline in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) roles across the United States, with 2,600 positions eliminated since 2023. This marks a 13 percent reduction, bringing the total number of DEI-related jobs to approximately 17,700 as of January 2025, down from a peak of 20,000 in 2023.

The report highlights a dramatic shift from the rapid growth seen in recent years. Job postings for DEI roles surged by 595 percent in August 2022 compared to 2020. Positions tied to terms like “belonging,” “social impact,” or “culture” are also reportedly in decline.

This comes as major corporations scale back DEI programs and reduce financial support for Pride events, following a crackdown on what the Trump administration has termed illegal DEI practices. President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order in January 2025 aimed at eliminating identity-based employment considerations and restoring merit-based opportunities. Among the corporations to comply, at least in part, are Target, Deloitte, Lockheed Martin, and Verizon.

Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is expected to release further guidance soon, including recommendations for the private sector and a list of ongoing compliance investigations. Additionally, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, led by Harmeet Dhillon, has named investigating race-based employment discrimination as a top priority.

Observers have raised concerns about the potential rebranding of DEI roles within corporate structures. Will Hild, Executive Director of Consumers’ Research, warns, “If they just relabel DEI to be some department of HR, it’s not going to do any good.” Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows that the human resources sector employed 922,000 people in 2024, up from 631,000 in 2016.

The analysis also revealed demographic trends within the DEI workforce. Women comprised more than 71 percent of DEI professionals from 2020 to 2024, compared to 51 percent in other roles. Additionally, Black and Hispanic workers accounted for 33 percent of DEI positions, compared to 21 percent of other roles. “That’s a tacit admission that they were engaging in race- and sex-based discrimination,” Hild commented, adding: “I’m hopeful and encouraged that Harmeet will drop the hammer on these companies.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

U.S. Court of International Trade Strikes Down Trump’s Tariffs.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A little-known federal court has blocked President Donald J. Trump’s ability to impose and collect trade tariffs connected to his April 2 “Liberation Day” announcement.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump and a three-judge panel on the United States Court of International Trade.

📍 Where & When: The ruling was handed down late Wednesday on May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” the court order reads.

⚠️ Impact: The ruling effectively ends the trade duties unless the order is set aside by a Federal Circuit court as litigation proceeds.

IN FULL:

The United States Court of International Trade handed down a ruling enjoining President Donald J. Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, which include his reciprocal tariffs—mostly paused—and the 10 percent global tariff. According to the court—which operated as an internal Treasury Department board until being elevated to an Article III federal court by Congress in 1956—President Trump’s national emergency claim exceeds his Article II authority as the chief executive.

An emergency declaration citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) underpins the “Liberation Day” tariffs, which Trump announced on April 2. This declaration cites the need to end the continued flow of fentanyl from China, through Canada and Mexico, into the United States as a national emergency, among other issues.

“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” the court order reads, continuing: “This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the court further finds no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter against the United States. The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.”

“There is no question here of narrowly tailored relief; if the challenged Tariff Orders are unlawful as to Plaintiffs, they are unlawful as to all,” the three-judge panel added.

According to White House sources, the ruling will be swiftly appealed to the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Court Clears Way for Trump’s Russiagate Lawsuit Against Pulitzer Board to Proceed.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A Florida appellate court rejected the Pulitzer Prize Board’s request to pause President Donald J. Trump’s defamation lawsuit against its members on presidential immunity grounds.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump, the Pulitzer Prize Board, Judge Robert Rugg of Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal.

📍 Where & When: Ruling issued in Florida on Wednesday, May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: Judge Rugg wrote, “Respondent [Trump] is in the best position to determine if these proceedings would be a diversion and interfere with the obligations of his office.”

⚠️ Impact: The lawsuit will proceed, with potential discovery of the board’s internal deliberations over controversial Pulitzer awards for debunked Trump-Russia collusion reporting.

IN FULL:

A Florida appellate court has denied the Pulitzer Prize Board’s petition to pause President Donald J. Trump‘s defamation lawsuit against its members, marking a significant step forward in the case. The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s ruling, issued Wednesday by Judge Robert Rugg, dismissed the board’s claim that the proceedings should be halted due to presidential immunity concerns.

The lawsuit stems from the board’s refusal to revoke 2018 Pulitzer Prizes awarded to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their reporting on alleged Trump-Russia collusion during the 2016 election. The narrative has since been widely debunked. While neither media outlet is a defendant in the case, Trump argues that the board’s decision to uphold the awards constitutes defamation.

The Pulitzer board has sought to delay the case and shield its internal deliberations from public scrutiny during the discovery process. In January, the board filed for a protective order in Florida’s Okeechobee County, describing its request as a “garden variety” measure to maintain confidentiality in line with longstanding practices. However, Wednesday’s ruling clears the way for discovery, potentially exposing how the board decided to honor the controversial reporting.

Previously, the board had invoked presidential immunity arguments, claiming that ongoing legal proceedings could interfere with Trump’s official duties. The circuit court rejected this reasoning earlier this year, stating that Trump himself could determine whether the case posed a distraction. Judge Rugg upheld that decision, writing, “Respondent [Trump] is in the best position to determine if these proceedings would be a diversion and interfere with the obligations of his office, or whether his continued participation is consistent with the performance of his official responsibilities.”

The ruling also noted that Trump retains the option to dismiss the case or seek a stay if his presidential obligations change.

The decision represents another legal victory for Trump, as the defamation case will now move forward. The Pulitzer board’s efforts to maintain secrecy over its deliberations now face increased scrutiny, particularly given the widespread discrediting of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Vance Addresses Bitcoin 2025: ‘There’s a New Sheriff in Town.’

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Vice President J.D. Vance addressed the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, detailing the Trump administration’s efforts to integrate digital assets into the U.S. economy and reverse Biden-era anti-cryptocurrency regulations.

👥 Who’s Involved: Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, American investors, retirees, and the digital asset and financial industries.

📍 Where & When: Vance’s address occurred on Wednesday, May 28, at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.

💬 Key Quote: “I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.

⚠️ Impact: The Trump administration’s move to roll back anti-crypto regulation could ease the way for the technology’s broader adoption and use in the American economy.

IN FULL:

Vice President J.D. Vance detailed the Trump administration’s aggressive deregulation of cryptocurrencies and associated technologies in an address at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. Speaking before attendees, Vance announced that “there’s a new sheriff in town” before emphasizing that President Donald J. Trump’s America First agenda includes a comprehensive rollback of the former Biden government’s anti-cryptocurrency regulatory actions.

“But as you know, there’s a new sheriff in town, because after four years of mistreatment and outright hostility led by Democrat regulators, lawmakers in this country have a choice,” Vance said in Las Vegas on Wednesday, May 28. He continued: “Will we lead our nation into a future of financial sovereignty, of innovation, and of prosperity? Or will we let unelected bureaucrats and foreign competitors write the rules for us?”

“And I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.

Notably, Vance’s speech coincided with a move by the Trump administration earlier on Wednesday to remove Biden-era regulations barring cryptocurrency as an asset in 401(k) retirement plans—a policy goal pushed for by many in the financial and digital assets industries.

“In our administration, we understand the full potential of the digital assets industry,” Vance said, adding: “Not just as an investment, not just as a flashy technology, but as a symbol and driver of personal liberty for all our citizens.”

Since his inauguration in January, President Trump has enacted a series of significant reforms that have cleared the way for the broader adoption and use of cryptocurrencies in the American economy. In March, Trump announced the establishment of a national Bitcoin reserve with the goal of retaining an estimated 200,000 Bitcoin, mainly sourced through cryptocurrency assets already seized by federal agencies in criminal proceedings.

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Admin Threatens to Deny Visas to UK Government Censors.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration announced a visa ban targeting British officials involved in censoring American citizens, warning that foreign actors who trample free speech rights will no longer be welcome in the United States.

👤Who’s Involved: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, British media regulator Ofcom, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley, and Lucy Connolly, a British mother imprisoned for a social media post.

🧾Key Quote: “We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech,” said Rubio.

⚠️Fallout: British officials were blindsided by the announcement and are scrambling for answers from the White House, as pro-censorship authorities face mounting scrutiny from Washington.

📌Significance: The move marks a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s effort to push back against globalist speech controls and defend the First Amendment from foreign interference.

IN FULL:

British government officials involved in censoring American citizens could soon be barred from setting foot in the United States under a sweeping new measure from the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the visa restrictions on Wednesday, directly targeting foreign bureaucrats and regulators deemed “complicit in censoring” Americans online.

The policy appears to be aimed at Ofcom, the British government media regulator responsible for enforcing the controversial Online Safety Act—a law that critics say enables sweeping censorship and punishes American tech companies with massive fines. Under the legislation, platforms that fail to remove so-called “harmful content” face penalties of up to £18 million (~$24.4 million) or 10 percent of annual revenue, placing U.S.-based firms in the crosshairs of British law.

“For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights,” Rubio said. “It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil.”

The Trump administration has taken particular offense at the British government’s attempts to impose extra-territorial censorship, with Rubio adding: “It is… unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.”

The announcement reportedly caught British officials off guard, with diplomats urgently seeking clarity from Washington. The warning comes just days after it was reported that the White House is actively “monitoring” the case of Lucy Connolly, a British mother sentenced to 31 months in prison for a social media post about a mass stabbing targeting young girls in Southport, England, perpetrated by the son of two African asylum seekers.

That case drew international concern after British officials threatened to prosecute or extradite Americans who violated their hate speech laws online. “We will throw the full force of the law at people,” warned Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the time. “Whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

In response, U.S. State Department officials from the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor traveled to London in March. The diplomats reportedly met with pro-life activists—imprisoned for as little as silently praying inside their heads near abortionist clinics under laws restricting freedom of expression and religion.

The Vice President has taken a personal interest in censorship in Britain and Europe more broadly, warning during a speech in Germany, “In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump: ‘Harvard… They’re Getting Their Ass Kicked.’

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: President Donald J. Trump says “Harvard wants to fight” his administration, but is losing badly, and must hand over the names of its foreign students if it wants to deescalate tensions with the White House.

👤Who’s Involved: President Trump, Harvard University, the Department of Homeland Security, and foreign students enrolled under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP).

🧾Key Quote: “Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they’re getting their ass kicked,” Trump said.

⚠️Fallout: The administration has frozen $3 billion in federal funding, moved to strip Harvard of its SEVP certification, and blocked new foreign visa appointments—threatening to cost the university hundreds of millions in tuition revenue.

📌Significance: Trump’s hard line against Harvard signals a broader crackdown on elite institutions accused of harboring antisemitism and evading federal oversight, while putting foreign student programs under unprecedented scrutiny.

IN FULL:

President Donald J. Trump is stipulating that Harvard University must hand over the names of its foreign students if it wants to rachet down its conflict with the White House. Speaking in the Oval Office on Wednesday, the America First leader emphasized that “Harvard wants to fight” and that his administration is ready to continue increasing pressure on the university to comply with federal directives on antisemitism and foreign student visa vetting.

“So, we have to look at the list, and Harvard has to understand, the last thing I want to do is hurt them. They’re hurting themselves,” President Trump said, referring to his administration’s requests for the university to enact reforms and crack down on anti-Semitic activists and demonstrations on campus. “Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they’re getting their ass kicked.”

In recent weeks, the Trump administration has suspended an estimated $3 billion in federal funding for Harvard, tied to concerns it is failing to tackle anti-Semitism and discriminating against white and Asian applicants in favour of less qualified applicants from other groups.

Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has moved to revoke the university’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification. Around 27 percent of Harvard’s total enrolled student population is foreign, at just under 7,000. With the total cost for a foreign student to attend the Ivy League university estimated to be over $100,000 per year, the loss of those students could be a crippling financial blow to Harvard, in the hundreds of millions of dollars each year.

An Obama-appointed judge blocked this specific move, but the administration subsequently suspended the importation of foreign students generally, until new social media vetting processes are established.

While Harvard has tried to appear defiant to Trump’s White House directives in public, it is widely reported that the university’s administration is privately panicking over the reputational damage and financial burden the school is facing. Harvard is currently engaged in several ongoing lawsuits against the Trump administration.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Musk ATTACKS Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Elon Musk publicly criticized President Donald J. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” in an interview with the corporate media.

👤Who’s Involved: Elon Musk, President Trump, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and the U.S. House of Representatives.

🧾Key Quote: “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both,” Musk told CBS.

⚠️Fallout: Musk’s remarks come amid significant downward revisions to DOGE’s initial projected savings, raising questions about his competence to publicly critique the “big, beautiful bill.”

📌Significance: Musk’s comments risk fracturing support for a major Trump legislative win, as the administration moves forward with its pledges to cut taxes while increasing spending on defense and border security.

IN FULL:

Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) frontman Elon Musk is undermining one of President Donald J. Trump’s hallmark second-term initiatives this week, casting public doubt on the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that recently passed in the House of Representatives. Speaking to CBS, Musk remarked: “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both.”

The legislation—championed by President Trump and widely supported by the America First movement—includes broad fiscal reforms, tax relief, and administrative restructuring designed to streamline federal governance. However, Musk’s public critique suggests the package may inflate the budget deficit and undermine his largely unsuccessful efficiency cuts.

“I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,” Musk complained.

While the bill does fulfill Trump’s key campaign promises to cut taxes on tips, overtime, and social security, it also increases spending on border security and defense to fund major initiatives backed by Trump and congressional Republicans.

Notably, the “big, beautiful bill” is a reconciliation bill. Senior Trump administration official Stephen Miller has explained that “DOGE cuts are to discretionary spending,” and Senate budget rules stipulate that “you cannot cut discretionary spending (only mandatory) in a reconciliation bill.”

DOGE was initially projected to save the federal government up to $2 trillion through automation, auditing, and streamlining. However, those estimates have been revised significantly downward, with current projected savings closer to $150 billion.

Musk’s remarks feature in a preview of a CBS interview that will air in full on June 1.

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Moves to Strip Top Liberal State’s Federal Funding.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: President Donald J. Trump threatened to cut federal funding to California if transgender athletes continue competing in women’s sports.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and California high school athletes.

📍 Where & When: California, following a weekend high school track meet; Trump’s statement was posted Tuesday on Truth Social.

💬 Key Quote: Trump wrote, “California continues to ILLEGALLY allow MEN TO PLAY IN WOMEN’S SPORTS… This is a totally ridiculous situation!!!”

⚠️ Impact: Trump’s threats could affect billions of dollars in federal funding to California.

IN FULL:

President Donald J. Trump took to Truth Social on Tuesday to criticize California’s policies on transgender athletes, threatening to withdraw federal funding if the state continues to permit biological males to compete against women and girls. Trump’s remarks were directed at Governor Gavin Newsom (D) and referenced a recent high school sports event where a transgender won the girls’ long jump and triple jump titles during the California Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Masters Meet.

“California continues to ILLEGALLY allow MEN TO PLAY IN WOMEN’S SPORTS,” Trump posted. “I will speak to him today to find out which way he wants to go??? In the meantime I am ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow the transitioned person to compete in the State Finals. This is a totally ridiculous situation!!!”

This marks the second time in recent weeks that Trump has targeted a state over the participation of biological males in women’s sports. Last month, he initiated steps to withdraw federal education funding from Maine over a similar dispute with Governor Janet Mills (D), a conflict that has since escalated into legal proceedings.

Gov. Newsom, eyeing a 2028 bid for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, has sought to distance himself from the transgender athlete issue in recent months. In April, Newsom labeled it “deeply unfair” for biological males to compete in women’s sports but insisted the issue involves only a small number of athletes. He also accused conservatives of politicizing the matter, stating, “To the extent that someone could find that right balance, I would embrace those conversations and the dignity that hopefully presents themselves in that conversation.”

President Trump’s post raises questions about the potential loss of significant federal funding for California. The Golden State has previously clashed with the Trump administration over policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Suspends Importation of Foreign Students.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration has instructed U.S. missions abroad to halt new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants as it reviews and plans to expand social media vetting.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump’s administration, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, and foreign students.

📍 Where & When: U.S. missions worldwide, as of a cable sent Tuesday, May 27, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that’s coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,” said State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce.

⚠️ Impact: The move impacts international students and exchange visitors. Last week, a federal judge temporarily blocked a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directive revoking Harvard University’s certification to enroll foreign students.

IN FULL:

The Trump administration has directed U.S. missions overseas to cease scheduling new appointments for foreign student and exchange visitor visa applicants while it reviews and prepares to implement expanded social media vetting processes, according to an internal State Department cable. According to the cable, attributed to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department plans to update procedures for screening foreign students under F, M, and J visa categories. It advises consular sections to suspend new appointments, though existing ones may proceed under current guidelines.

“The Department is conducting a review of existing operations and processes for screening and vetting of student and exchange visitor visa applicants and plans to issue guidance on expanded social media vetting for all such applicants,” the cable states.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, while declining to comment on the cable, emphasized the administration’s commitment to rigorous vetting. “We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that’s coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,” Bruce said during a press briefing. The expanded vetting process is expected to require adjustments to resources and operations at consular sections globally. Additionally, the cable underscores prioritizing services for U.S. citizens, immigrant visas, and fraud prevention amid these changes.

The National Pulse reported last week that the Trump administration had moved to revoke Harvard University‘s ability to import foreign students under the student visa program. The decision cites “pro-terrorist conduct” at campus protests and the university’s failure to comply with federal reporting requirements. However, the directive was subsequently temporarily blocked by a federal judge appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Notably, Harvard’s foreign student population comprises 27 percent of its total enrollment.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more