The full text of the Biden-McCarthy negotiated debt deal has now been released. The bill, released Sunday night, is 99 pages long,
You can read the full bill text for the McCarthy-Biden debt deal, below:
More From The Pulse
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Wrestling legend and television personality Hulk Hogan has passed away.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hulk Hogan, known for his wrestling career and recent support for President Donald Trump.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Hogan died at the age of 71.
🎯IMPACT: Hogan’s death marks the end of an era for wrestling fans and supporters of his political views.
IN FULL
Hulk Hogan, the iconic wrestler and reality television star, has died at the age of 71. Known for his larger-than-life persona and his contributions to the world of professional wrestling, Hogan was a beloved figure among fans.
In addition to his wrestling career, Hogan was also a reality TV star, appearing in several shows that showcased his life and personality. His influence extended beyond the ring, making him a household name.
Hogan was also recognized for his political involvement, notably speaking at the Republican National Convention in support of Donald Trump. His endorsement was a significant moment in his public life, aligning him with Trump’s policies and campaign.
Fans and colleagues alike have expressed their condolences, remembering Hogan as a trailblazer in the wrestling industry and a charismatic figure in entertainment. His passing is a significant loss to those who admired him both professionally and personally.
Hogan’s legacy will undoubtedly continue to influence the world of wrestling and entertainment for years to come, as fans reflect on the impact he had on their lives and the industry as a whole.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show more
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s former associate, in Florida, where she is serving her sentence for child sex trafficking.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the Trump administration.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting is expected to take place at the Federal Correctional Institution-Tallahassee on Thursday, July 24, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: The House Oversight Committee has approved a subpoena for Maxwell, with President Donald J. Trump stating the move “sounds appropriate.”
🎯IMPACT: The meeting and related developments in the Epstein case have reignited public calls for transparency regarding the deceased pedophile’s associates and files.
IN FULL
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has announced plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of underage girls. The meeting comes amid ongoing scrutiny over the handling of Epstein-related files.
Maxwell’s attorneys have confirmed that she is “in discussions” with the government. The former associate of Epstein, now 63, was convicted in 2021 and is currently held at the Federal Correctional Institution-Tallahassee (FCI Tallahassee). Her legal team has appealed her conviction to the Supreme Court.
The House Oversight Committee has approved a subpoena for Maxwell, with Trump stating the move “sounds appropriate.” Meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondi has faced pressure to release further documents related to the case. Bondi revealed earlier this year that she had a “truckload” of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) files and suggested Epstein’s client list was “on [her] desk.” However, she has released only a limited tranche of documents and questionable video footage since then, with the Department of Justice (DOJ) now claiming no “client list” exists.
Trump, who has called for the media and public to move on from the Epstein matter, previously criticized the continued focus on the case, saying, “Are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.” On Truth Social, he dismissed the issue as “bulls**t” and accused critics of his stance of aiding Democrats.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been instructed to increase the use of GPS-enabled ankle monitors for immigrants in the Alternatives to Detention program.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: ICE personnel, immigrants enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention program, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
📍WHEN & WHERE: McLaughlin said that illegals who do not want to wear ankle monitors should leave the country on July 24.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If you are in America illegally, you may be ‘shackled’ with a GPS ankle monitor. If you don’t want to wear one, you should leave the country now.” — DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The policy could significantly expand surveillance and affect thousands of immigrants, with potential business impacts for private companies involved.
IN FULL
The Trump administration has increased the use of GPS-enabled ankle monitors for illegal immigrants, according to an internal ICE document. ICE has instructed personnel to apply these devices to all migrants in the Alternatives to Detention program—around 183,000 people, compared to only 24,000 who are tagged at present—wherever it is feasible. An exception is made for pregnant women, who will wear wrist-worn devices instead.
Critics of immigration controls in the Democratic Party, nonprofits, and corporate media argue the devices are stigmatizing, with The Washington Post suggesting illegals are being “shackled”—despite admitting they are only as heavy as a deck of cards.
The Trump administration is taking these criticisms in stride, with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin responding on Thursday, “Yes. If you are in America illegally, you may be ‘shackled’ with a GPS ankle monitor. If you don’t want to wear one, you should leave the country now through the [CBP] Home app!”
ICE spokeswoman Emily Covington stated that ankle monitors are an “enforcement tool” to ensure compliance with immigration laws, adding that “more accountability shouldn’t come as a surprise.”
Yes. If you are in America illegally, you may be “shackled” with a GPS ankle monitor. If you don’t want to wear one, you should leave the country now through the @CBP Home app!
Democracy really would die in darkness without the @washingtonpost. https://t.co/2d6V3aO6s6 pic.twitter.com/WLXmA6J3Or
— Tricia McLaughlin (@TriciaOhio) July 24, 2025
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mails.
show more
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former President Trump addressed concerns about subsidies for Elon Musk’s companies.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump made the statement on Truth Social this morning.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!” – Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: Trump intends to maintain existing subsidies to support Elon Musk‘s profits, after a week of Musk attacking Trump over his reported Epstein links.
IN FULL
Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform to clarify his stance on government subsidies for Elon Musk’s companies. Amidst speculation that he might cut these subsidies, Trump stated that he has no intention of doing so. The statement comes after Musk spent weeks trashing Trump over his purported links to Jeffrey Epstein.
“Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon’s companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!” Trump declared, emphasizing his new-found support for Musk’s ventures, and taxpayer subsidy in what appears to be an attempt to buy Musk’s silence.
Trump expressed his fresh desire for Musk’s companies to thrive off government welfare.
“The better they do, the better the USA does, and that’s good for all of us,” he claimed.
The president highlighted the record-setting business achievements of the nation and his wish to maintain this positive trajectory.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
A newly declassified intelligence report reveals explosive details about Hillary Clinton’s physical and “psycho-emotional” condition during the 2016 election—and efforts by top Democrats to keep it under wraps.
The details: A newly declassified House Intelligence Committee report revealed that Russian intelligence intercepted DNC communications stating Clinton was:
- 💊 Taking “heavy tranquilizers” during the 2016 campaign
- 🧠 Experiencing “intensified psycho-emotional problems,” including “uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness”
- 🫀 Juggling multiple health conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, and COPD
The House Intel Committee based its report on 20 interviews with intelligence officers and FBI agents, as well as source material. The bombshell information was obtained by Russian hackers targeting Clinton’s campaign and the DNC.
Obama knew: The intel stated that Clinton’s conditions were “extraordinarily alarming” to Obama and DNC leaders, but kept secret even from her closest aides.
Back up: At the 9/11 memorial service in 2016, Clinton was filmed nearly unconscious, being dragged to her car [seen in the image above or here].
Corruption: According to the report, the Russians also obtained campaign e-mails showing Clinton’s team solicited donations from religious organizations by promising favorable treatment from her administration, if elected.
Clinton approved the Russia hoax: The report also says Clinton personally approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal surrounding her private email server.
Why didn’t Putin use it? According to the report, Russia didn’t leak its findings during the 2016 campaign because it believed a Clinton victory was inevitable and planned to release them after she had been sworn in to weaken her and undermine the U.S.
Zoom out: This release comes days after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed that President Obama directed the “treasonous conspiracy” to launch the Russia collusion hoax, which plagued Trump’s first term.
- Related: Yesterday, the Department of Justice formed a “strike force” to assess the evidence revealed by Gabbard relating to Obama and his national security and intelligence teams.
Big picture: The Clinton campaign wasn’t just hiding emails—it was hiding a health crisis, buying off religious groups, and manufacturing a narrative. And Obama covered it up.
Be sure to subscribe to the Wake Up Right newsletter!
show less
A newly declassified intelligence report reveals explosive details about Hillary Clinton’s physical and “psycho-emotional” condition during the 2016 election—and efforts by top Democrats to keep it under wraps.
show more
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Tesla’s market share in Europe fell for the sixth consecutive month in June.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tesla, Elon Musk, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA), JATO Dynamics, BYD, Leapmotor, Xpeng, Volkswagen Group.
📍WHEN & WHERE: June 2025, Europe.
💬KEY QUOTE: Musk is warning his car company “could have a few rough quarters” in front of it.
🎯IMPACT: Tesla faces increased competition, particularly from China, and a loss of popularity tied to Elon Musk’s political activities.
IN FULL
Tesla’s market share in Europe fell to 2.8 percent in June, down from 3.4 percent the previous year, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA). This marks the sixth consecutive month of market share decline for Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company.
The decline in Tesla’s market share comes as the company faces stiff competition from Chinese automakers such as BYD, Leapmotor, and Xpeng, whose market share in Europe almost doubled to 5.1 percent over the first half of the year.
Tesla’s new car registrations also dropped to 34,781 units in June, a decline of 22.9 percent compared to the same month in 2024. The company’s struggles are compounded by Elon Musk’s growing unpopularity, with liberals irked by his support for U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign and conservatives irked by his betrayal of President Trump just months into his second term.
Ben Nelmes of New AutoMotive remains cautiously optimistic about Tesla’s future. He notes that the company could continue to innovate through new technologies in the electric and autonomous vehicle markets. However, he believes it is now “looking more likely to be a niche brand in a bigger electric car market.”
Tesla’s challenges in Europe are further exacerbated by potential financial pressures in the U.S., where the company may face higher tariff costs and the expiration of federal EV tax credits following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which Musk bitterly opposed.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Teamsters union boss Sean O’Brien testified before Congress, discussing tariffs, trade agreements, and concerns about foreign truck drivers.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sean O’Brien and members of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday, during a Senate Commerce Subcommittee hearing on Surface Transportation.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Take a little less in your own pocket, stop giving more to Wall Street, and just reward your workers and don’t pass this cost on the consumers.” – Sean O’Brien
🎯IMPACT: O’Brien’s testimony highlighted union concerns about tariffs, trade policies, and foreign drivers, sparking debate over worker protections and corporate responsibility.
IN FULL
During a recent congressional hearing, International Brotherhood of Teamsters President Sean O’Brien made clear where the union stands on President Donald J. Trump‘s tariffs and trade policy. He said it was “no secret” the union supports tariffs, reaffirming the organization’s commitment to protecting American workers and revitalizing domestic industry.
O’Brien pushed back on criticisms labeling him a “self-promoting union boss.” Instead, he described as “a truck driver from a middle-class family that appreciates and embraces the preservation of the middle class.”
Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH) acknowledged O’Brien’s dedication to workers, saying he believes O’Brien’s advocacy for the middle class is sincere. O’Brien agreed, emphasizing his union’s efforts to secure better outcomes for American workers.
The Teamsters chief also sharply criticized the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), blaming it for the decline in U.S. manufacturing jobs. “Remember when we had plenty of industry in this country where we were producing goods and services. We were manufacturing steel. We were doing a lot of this work. And then these bad trade deals happened…” he said.
O’Brien expressed concern that corporate America would respond to new tariffs by pushing added costs onto consumers rather than reducing excessive executive compensation. “Take a little less in your own pocket, stop giving more to Wall Street, and just reward your workers and don’t pass this cost on the consumers,” he urged.
Another issue raised during the hearing was the growing use of foreign nationals in commercial driving roles, particularly individuals lacking English proficiency. “I think it’s extremely frightening, to be honest with you,” O’Brien said, referring to the safety risks posed by drivers who cannot read road signs or communicate effectively. He suggested a safer system would be for Mexican drivers to leave their trailers at the U.S. border, allowing American drivers to handle domestic transportation.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show more
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The White House unveiled Winning the AI Race: America’s AI Action Plan, following President Donald J. Trump’s executive order on Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced in Washington, DC, as part of ongoing Federal efforts to lead in AI innovation.
💬KEY QUOTE: “America’s unique advantage that no other country can possibly have is President Trump.” – Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia
🎯IMPACT: The plan aims to secure U.S. dominance in AI through innovation, infrastructure, and global partnerships, while safeguarding American workers and values.
IN FULL
The White House today released Winning the AI Race: America’s AI Action Plan, in accordance with President Trump’s January executive order on Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI. The plan sets forth over 90 Federal policy actions, and has earned praise from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who said, “America’s unique advantage that no other country can possibly have is President Trump.”
Key policies include expediting permits for data centers, removing restrictive regulations on AI development, and ensuring free speech in AI systems contracted by the federal government. The comprehensive strategy aims to propel the U.S. to the forefront of global AI leadership.
“America’s AI Action Plan charts a decisive course to cement U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence. President Trump has prioritized AI as a cornerstone of American innovation, powering a new age of American leadership in science, technology, and global influence,” said Michael Kratsios, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted the broader implications, noting: “Winning the AI Race is non-negotiable. America must continue to be the dominant force in artificial intelligence to promote prosperity and protect our economic and national security. These clear-cut policy goals set expectations for the Federal Government to ensure America sets the technological gold standard worldwide.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has opened an investigation into Harvard University’s use of international visas through the Exchange Visitor Program.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Harvard University, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs, and President Donald J. Trump.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation was announced on Wednesday, with ongoing legal proceedings in Boston federal court.
💬KEY QUOTE: “All sponsors participating in this program are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded.” – Secretary Rubio
🎯IMPACT: The investigation could affect Harvard’s ability to sponsor foreign students and scholars, with potential implications for federal funding and visa processing.
IN FULL
The Trump administration has launched an investigation into Harvard University’s use of international visas. Announced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday, the probe will assess the university’s compliance with the Exchange Visitor Program (J-visa) and its eligibility to continue as a sponsor.
“[The State Department] is opening an investigation into Harvard’s authority to sponsor exchange visas,” Sec. Rubio wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). He added: “Visa sponsorship is a privilege, and sponsors whose conduct tarnishes our nation’s interests will lose that privilege.”
Rubio stated the investigation aims to ensure that “State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation’s interests.”
“All sponsors participating in this program are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded,” Rubio said. He stressed that sponsors must ensure their activities do not undermine U.S. foreign policy or national security interests.
In response, a Harvard spokesman claimed the investigation is “yet another retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard’s First Amendment rights.”
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem previously attempted to revoke Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), citing concerns over foreign students’ ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and accusations of fostering violence and anti-Semitism. Harvard challenged the decision in court, arguing the move jeopardized the education of over 7,000 international students. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs—a Barack Obama appointee—sided with Harvard, blocking the revocation while litigation continues.
President Donald J. Trump issued a presidential order in June directing the State Department to deny visas to students at institutions under federal investigation for national security or anti-Semitism concerns, explicitly naming Harvard. Despite this, Judge Burroughs ordered consular offices to process visas and allow Harvard students entry into the U.S.
Harvard is also contesting the administration’s decision to cut $2.6 billion in federal research funding, with a decision on the matter still pending.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
PULSE POINTS
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A majority of Germans oppose efforts to ban the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, with many viewing it as an attempt by the government to stifle opposition.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), former Interior Minister Nancy Faeser, AfD leadership, and German voters.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The classification of AfD as “right-wing extremist” occurred in May, with recent polling conducted by the Allensbach Institute.
💬KEY QUOTE: Andreas Rödder of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz called such a ban a “sure path to civil war.”
🎯IMPACT: A ban on the AfD could undermine faith in German democracy, with 54 percent of respondents believing a similar party would emerge if the AfD were disbanded.
IN FULL
A recent poll has revealed that more than half of German voters are against banning the right-wing populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, despite its classification as “right-wing extremist” by the country’s domestic intelligence agency. In May, under then-Interior Minister Nancy Faeser, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) designated the AfD as an extremist organization. This decision, which could enable increased surveillance and even lead to a formal ban, is currently being challenged in court.
While some members of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens have pushed for outlawing the party, the idea is not widely supported among the public. According to a survey of 1,054 voters conducted by the Allensbach Institute, 52 percent of Germans oppose banning the AfD, while only 27 percent are in favor and 21 percent remain undecided.
Although 54 percent of respondents believe the AfD qualifies as a right-wing extremist group, personal views on its supporters are more nuanced. The poll found that many Germans know someone, whether a friend or family member, who backs the party, yet only five percent of respondents described those individuals as extremists.
The survey also revealed concerns that targeting the AfD could be perceived as a political maneuver to suppress legitimate opposition. Currently serving as the official opposition in the Bundestag (federal legislature) and ranking as the second-largest party, the AfD’s removal would be undemocratic. Over half of those surveyed, 54 percent, said they believed that banning the party would not significantly change the political landscape, since another group with similar views would likely take its place.
Some political experts have warned of the risks such a move poses to Germany’s democratic stability. Professor Andreas Rödder of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz cautioned that banning the AfD “would eliminate all votes for the AfD and thus lead to [a left-wing] parliamentary majority,” calling the prospect a “sure path to civil war.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show more
