The United States has agreed to swap prisoners with the Islamic Republic of Iran as well as releasing $6 billion in previously frozen funds. A blanket waiver, issued by President Joe Biden’s State Department on September 11th, will allow international banks in South Korea to transfer $6 billion to Qatar’s central bank for Iran’s use without triggering U.S. sanctions. Congress was informed of the deal on Monday, despite Secretary of State Antony Blinken reportedly having signed off on the agreement last week.
The five Iranian prisoners held by the U.S. to be swapped are reported to be: Mehrdad Moein Ansari, Kambiz Attar Kashani, Reza Sarhangpour Kafrani, Amin Hassanzadeh, Kaveh Afrasiabi.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Kambiz Attar Kashani and Reza Sarhangpour Kafrani were imprisoned “…for conspiring to illegally export U.S. goods and technology to end users in Iran…” in violation of U.S. sanctions according to the Department of Justice. Kaveh Afrasiabi was arrested for acting as an unregistered foreign agent for Iran, having lobbied both Congress and the State Department for policies favorable to the Islamic Republic. Michigan resident Amin Hasanzadeh was imprisoned for stealing a U.S. company’s trade secrets and conspiring to share them with the Iranian military through his brother who still resides in Iran. Mehrdad Ansari was also imprisoned over a scheme to circumvent U.S. sanctions.
At this time it is unclear what, or who, the U.S. will receive from the Islamic Republic of Iran as part of the agreement.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Border Patrol agents and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are conducting an immigration crackdown operation in downtown Chicago, and taking on violent and in some cases armed far-left rioters.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Border Patrol agents, ICE officers, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D), Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D), illegal immigrants, and far-left agitators.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The operation, named “Midway Blitz,” began on September 8 and included activity in downtown Chicago, including the River North neighborhood on Sunday morning.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I would say the majority are actually glad we’re here. They are congratulating us, saying, ‘It’s about time you’re here.’ Especially those inner-city residents here in Chicago are very glad we’re here.” – Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol Commander-at-Large
🎯IMPACT: The enforcement action has attracted significant demonstrations by violent, far-left protesters and rioters—especially around the ICE detention facility in Broadview, a western suburb of Chicago.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump’s “Midway Blitz” immigration enforcement action is pressing on in Chicago, with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents making numerous arrests since the operation began on September 8. The enforcement action has drawn significant counter-protests by violent, far-left demonstrators—especially around the ICE detention facility in Broadview, a western suburb of Chicago.
“[Eleven] violent rioters were arrested last night in Chicago outside the ICE detention facility: These are two guns that were taken off rioters in Chicago right against the fence at our ICE detention facility,” the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wrote in post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday. “An investigation is underway into what appears to be some sort of explosive device found last night near the ICE Chicago detention facility.”
ARRESTS ARE BEING MADE:
11 violent rioters were arrested last night in Chicago outside the ICE detention facility:
These are two guns that were taken off rioters in Chicago right against the fence at our ICE detention facility.
Last Friday in Broadview, far-left activists —wearing gas masks and bandanas to obscure their faces—swarmed a DHS vehicle and attempted to block ICE agents from exiting the detention facility. In the latter case, a federal law enforcement agent fired tear gas to disperse them.
Despite the violent demonstrations, Illinois Democrats are, by and large, defending the anti-ICE political violence. Governor J.B. Pritzker (D-IL) has led the Democrat attacks, writing in a post on X, “The Trump Administration’s DHS officers appear to be carrying large weapons around downtown Chicago in camouflage and masks. This is not making anybody safer—it’s a show of intimidation, instilling fear in our communities and hurting our businesses. We cannot normalize militarizing American cities and suburbs. Make sure you know your rights and stay alert.”
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D) has also stoked anti-ICE sentiment, stating that residents “are being intimidated and threatened by masked federal agents flaunting automatic weapons for no apparent reason.”
However, Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino has pushed back against Johnson’s claims, stating, “I would say the majority are actually glad we’re here. They are congratulating us, saying, ‘It’s about time you’re here.’ Especially those inner-city residents here in Chicago are very glad we’re here, because oftentimes they’re up against that vast illegal migration that took place over the past four years. They’re the ones dealing with the violence perpetrated by illegal aliens.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced plans to impose tariffs on foreign-made movies and furniture.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, U.S. industries, and foreign manufacturers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made Monday, September 29, 2025, on Truth Social; tariffs expected to be reviewed by the Supreme Court in November.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Our movie making business has been stolen from the United States of America, by other Countries, just like stealing ‘candy from a baby.'” – President Trump
🎯IMPACT: Efforts aim to revitalize U.S. industries, particularly in California and North Carolina.
IN FULL
The predatory practices of foreign movie and foreign furniture industries are the latest targets of new tariffs issued by President Donald J. Trump. In a Monday post on Truth Social, the America First leader announced he will impose new tariffs on movie productions and furniture made outside of the United States in order to protect domestic cinema and furniture industries from unfair trade policies.
“Our movie making business has been stolen from the United States of America, by other Countries, just like stealing ‘candy from a baby.’ California, with its weak and incompetent Governor [Gavin Newsom], has been particularly hard hit! Therefore, in order to solve this long time, never ending problem, I will be imposing a 100% Tariff on any and all movies that are made outside of the United States,” President Trump wrote in one post on Monday.
In a second follow-up post, Trump added: “In order to make North Carolina, which has completely lost its furniture business to China, and other Countries, GREAT again, I will be imposing substantial Tariffs on any Country that does not make its furniture in the United States. Details to follow!!!”
The restoration of North Carolina’s once robust furniture manufacturing industry was a key policy pledge during Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. Meanwhile, in May of this year, President Trump directed the Department of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative to develop a plan to impose a 100 percent tariff on movies produced outside the U.S. The National Pulse reported at the time that the powerful Teamsters union is backing the movie tariff, stating: “We thank President Trump for boldly supporting good union jobs when others have turned their heads. This is a strong step toward finally reining in the studios’ un-American addiction to outsourcing our members’ work.”
While President Trump pushes ahead with his America First economic agenda, his use of tariffs to combat foreign predation and unfair trade practices will face a significant legal challenge in November. The U.S. Supreme Court is set to review a lower court decision that found the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to enact tariffs was unconstitutional during its fall session.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Anti-terror police in France raided a charity that aids persecuted Christians in the Middle East over allegations the group gave money to elements of the former Bashar al-Assad government in Syria.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: SOS Chrétiens d’Orient and its president, Charles de Meyer, French anti-terror police, and leftist media outlet Mediapart.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The raids took place over the weekend in France.
💬KEY QUOTE: “How could a Christian NGO defending Christians and working for peace be complicit in war crimes and crimes against humanity! These qualifications demonstrate the folly of such suspicions. Totally delusional!” – SOS Chretien d’Orient.
🎯IMPACT: The raid is just the latest in an alarming trend of anti-Christian attitudes and attacks in France.
IN FULL
French authorities have launched an investigation into SOS Chrétiens d’Orient, a France-based Christian aid association, over allegations that it may have channeled donor funds to militias that supported former President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Between Tuesday and Thursday, investigators carried out “several search operations within associations, including the French association SOS Chrétiens d’Orient, companies or at the homes of individuals, as well as several hearings as witnesses or defendants,” the national anti‑terror prosecutor’s office (PNAT) confirmed over the weekend.
The inquiry focuses on whether some of the charity’s funds were diverted to the National Defence Forces (NDF), a militia aligned with Assad. French media outlets report that the investigation is being handled by the Central Office for the Fight against Crimes against Humanity, Genocide and War Crimes (OCLCH).
“How could a Christian NGO defending Christians and working for peace be complicit in war crimes and crimes against humanity! These qualifications demonstrate the folly of such suspicions. Totally delusional!” the charity said in a statement, blaming leftist media group Mediapart for harassing them and their members for a vicious hit piece.
Charles de Meyer, president of the association, acknowledged that his computer was among the items seized by the police and confirmed he was questioned as a suspect.
The case takes place against a backdrop of growing anti‑Christian incidents in France. Churches in the country have been targeted many times in recent years—according to the Observatory of Intolerance and Discrimination Against Christians in Europe, nine churches across the continent were struck by arson attacks in a three‑week span from late August to mid‑September of last year, including one targeting the Church of the Immaculate Conception in Saint‑Omer, France.
During the opening of the Paris Olympics last summer, organizers apologized after a performance was interpreted as mocking the Last Supper. The director of the ceremony defended the scene as inspired by pagan themes, claiming it was not intended to target Christianity.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A gunman killed four people and injured eight at a Mormon church in Michigan before being killed in an exchange of gunfire with police.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The suspect was identified as 40-year-old Thomas Jacob Sanford, a former Marine from Burton, Michigan.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred on Sunday at a church in Grand Blanc Township, Michigan.
💬KEY QUOTE: “From what I understand based on my conversation with the FBI director, all they know right now is that this was an individual who hated people of the Mormon faith,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
🎯IMPACT: The attack has raised questions about the motive and planning, with federal authorities investigating the targeting of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
IN FULL
The deadly attack on a Mormon church in Michigan on Sunday that saw four killed and eight injured was motivated by the perpetrator’s hatred of Mormonism, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Thomas Jacob Sanford, a 40-year-old former Marine from Burton, Michigan, has been identified by authorities as the gunman, with Sanford being neutralized by police at the scene.
“From what I understand based on my conversation with the FBI director, all they know right now is that this was an individual who hated people of the Mormon faith,” Leavitt said during a televised interview on Monday morning. “They are trying to understand more about this, how premeditated it was, how much planning went into it, whether he left a note, all of those questions are yet to be answered, but certainly will be answered by the FBI.”
Karoline Leavitt on the suspected motive behind yesterday’s Grand Blanc, Michigan church shooting:
“This was an individual who hated people of the Mormon faith, and they are trying to understand more about this and how premeditated it was” pic.twitter.com/Offo8xEe5u
Leavitt did not reveal whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had indicated whether Sanford had a personal connection to the church or specific members. According to police, Sanford drove his truck into the church in Grand Blanc Township before opening fire on hundreds attending the Mormon service. He is also believed to have set the building on fire using an accelerant. A bomb squad was dispatched after improvised explosive devices were discovered at the crime scene.
The Michigan shooting is the second violent attack targeting Christians in the U.S. in just over a month. On August 27, anti-Trump transgenderRobin Westman, previously Robert, opened fire at a back-to-school Mass at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which claimed the lives of two young children and left at least 17 others wounded. Westman killed himself at the scene.
Mormonism has long been the subject of religious persecution and targeted violence. Between May 1857 and July 1858, Mormon settlers and U.S. federal government troops faced off in the then-Utah territory in what is known as the Utah War. The conflict, sparked by Mormon fears that federal troops had been sent to forcibly remove them, stemmed in part from Missouri Governor Lilburn Boggs’s (D) issuance of Missouri Executive Order 44, known as the Mormon Extermination Order, in 1838.
The order directed General John Bullock Clark and Missouri’s state militia to forcibly expel Mormons from the state. Notably, Boggs’s order remained on the books until it was formally rescinded in 1976.
NEW: Mormon church in Michigan is on fire following an active shooter incident, leaving multiple victims.
The incident happened at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Grand Blanc.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Senior members of Britain’s Labour Party government denounced Nigel Farage and his Reform Party as the “single greatest threat to the way of life” of Britons at their party conference.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage and the Reform Party, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, Chancellor Rachel Reeves, and other Labour Party leaders.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Labour Party conference in Liverpool, England, on September 29, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We must call his scheme to round up and deport our French, our Indian, our Caribbean neighbours who already have indefinite leave to remain what it is. It is racist.” – David Lammy
🎯IMPACT: Lammy’s comments sparked debate over immigration policies and accusations of racism within British politics.
IN FULL
Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, Chancellor Rachel Reeves, and other senior members of Britain’s governing Labour Party denounced Nigel Farage and his Reform Party at their annual party conference in Liverpool, England, on Monday, as they collapse in the polls and Farage’s populists solidify a consistent lead.
Lammy, who has previously described President Donald J. Trump as a “neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath” and “tyrant,” said Farage “wraps himself in our flag, but his policies don’t match British values.” A son of Guyanese immigrants, Lammy took particular umbrage with Farage’s plan to abolish indefinite leave to remain (ILR)—equivalent to lawful permanent residence in the U.S.—after just five years, to prevent the unprecedented “Boriswave” mass migration under former Prime Minister Boris Johnson from becoming permanent and unleashing an even greater wave of chain migration through so-called “family reunification.”
“We must call his scheme to round up and deport our French, our Indian, our Caribbean neighbours who already have indefinite leave to remain what it is: It is racist,” Lammy insisted. He was echoing Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who had told the BBC the previous day that Reform’s immigration policy was “racist” and “immoral.”
Chancellor Reeves, whose position is roughly equivalent to U.S. Treasury Secretary in the British Cabinet, went even further, declaring: “The single greatest threat to the way of life and to the living standards of working people is the agenda of Nigel Farage and the Reform Party.”
She Reform of pushing “falsehoods” and “easy answers” to Britain’s ongoing immigration crisis, claiming that, by moving to deport illegals and rescind the residency of legal immigrants who are a net drain on the public finances, they are “willing they are to tear communities and families apart.”
Labour’s furious denunciation of Reform comes as the party is consistently outpolling both Labour and the previously governing Conservatives (Tories) nationally. Labour’s Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is now the most unpopular in British history, with a net approval rating of negative 66.
Chancellor calls Nigel Farage’s Reform party the “single greatest threat” to our way of life, adding it is “not on the side of working people”.https://t.co/4Q5sIdjiI9
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The use of Tylenol, also known by its generic names paracetamol and acetaminophen (APAP), by pregnant women has been linked to “developmental alterations in both the reproductive tract and the brain” of unborn babies—especially boys.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Society for Reproduction and Fertility’s journal Reproduction; researchers hailing from Denmark, Brazil, France, Sweden, and the United States; the Trump administration; and pregnant women.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The study was conducted in 2017, with the Trump administration issuing new guidance for pregnant women on Tylenol use in September 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Together, these data suggest that prenatal exposure to APAP may impair male sexual behaviour in adulthood by disrupting the sexual neurobehavioral programming. These findings add to the growing body of evidence suggesting the need to limit the widespread exposure and use of APAP by pregnant women,” the 2017 study researchers wrote.
🎯IMPACT: The 2017 study bolsters new guidance issued by the Trump administration warning against the use of Tylenol by pregnant women due to potential links to the development of autism in children.
IN FULL
The use of Tylenol, also known by its generic names paracetamol and acetaminophen (APAP), by pregnant women has been linked to “developmental alterations in both the reproductive tract and the brain” of unborn babies, especially boys. A 2017 study, published in the Society for Reproduction and Fertility’s journal Reproduction, found that paracetamol/acetaminophen exposure in fetal male mammals has significant impacts on both physical and neurological sexual development that could still be observed in later adulthood.
“Through intrauterine exposure experiments in C57BL/6 mice, we found that exposure to APAP decreased neuronal number in the sexually dimorphic nucleus (SDN) of the preoptic area (POA) in the anterior hypothalamus of male adult offspring,” the 2017 study states. “Likewise, exposure to the environmental pollutant and precursor of APAP, aniline, resulted in a similar reduction. Decrease in neuronal number in the SDN-POA is associated with reductions in male sexual behaviour.”
The researchers—hailing from Denmark, Brazil, France, Sweden, and the United States—observed that fetal exposure to APAP altered critical mating behaviors in adult male mice, including territorial marking through urination and decreased aggressiveness toward the presence of other male mice. Concerningly, the study also found “exposed males had reduced intromissions and ejaculations during mating with females in oestrus.”
“Together, these data suggest that prenatal exposure to APAP may impair male sexual behaviour in adulthood by disrupting the sexual neurobehavioral programming,” the researchers contend, adding: “These findings add to the growing body of evidence suggesting the need to limit the widespread exposure and use of APAP by pregnant women.”
The 2017 study bolsters new guidance issued by the Trump administration, warning against the use of Tylenol by pregnant women due to potential links to the development of autism in children. The National Pulse previously reported that a now-defunct social media account for Tylenol warned in 2017 and 2019 that pregnant women should avoid its use.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Democrat New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani pledged to allocate an additional $100 million in taxpayer funds for legal defense services for illegal immigrants facing deportation.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, Mayor Eric Adams, Council Member Robert Holden, Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa, and illegal immigrants.
📍WHEN & WHERE: New York City, as part of Mamdani’s 2025 mayoral campaign proposals.
💬KEY QUOTE: “A cornerstone of our campaign is to increase funding for those very legal defense services by more than $100 million so that we can ensure we’re taking every step we can to keep New Yorkers safe, to keep New Yorkers together, and to show the world that they are welcome in this city,” said Zohran Mamdani.
🎯IMPACT: Critics argue the proposal unfairly burdens taxpayers and rewards lawbreaking, at the expense of legal immigrants and underfunded city priorities.
IN FULL
Democrat New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is calling for an additional $100 million in taxpayer funds to provide legal defense for illegal migrants facing deportation, describing the initiative as a “cornerstone” of his campaign during an interview. Mamdani claims that approximately 400,000 New York City residents are currently at risk of deportation and pointed out that fewer than 200 migrants received free legal representation last year.
“A cornerstone of our campaign is to increase funding for those very legal defense services by more than $100 million so that we can ensure we’re taking every step we can to keep New Yorkers safe, to keep New Yorkers together, and to show the world that they are welcome in this city,” Mamdani said.
New York City’s current budget already includes $54.5 million for migrant legal defense services. Mayor Eric Adams has said this amount is “more than any other major city in America.” Mamdani’s proposal would nearly triple that figure, but he has not outlined how the additional funds would be financed.
Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa condemned the plan, saying, “It is unfair to taxpayers and to those who played by the rules to come here legally, and enough is enough.”
Even Council Member Robert Holden, a Democrat representing Queens, said, “New York is in a fiscal crisis, and Mamdani wants to rip another $100 million from taxpayers to bankroll deportation defense, rewarding lawbreaking while seniors, classrooms, sanitation, and public safety go without.”
Since 2022, the city’s migrant crisis has cost an estimated $12 billion, covering expenses such as housing, food, and legal aid.
Mamdani, currently a state assemblyman from Queens, is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and has built a reputation for pushing progressive and controversial policies. At a rally on Staten Island earlier this year, the Ugandan immigrant denounced deportation efforts and reinforced his support for sanctuary protections. “As we gather here on an island… where nearly one in four were born outside of this country … it’s an island that we know is not immune from this horrific crackdown,” he said.
Previously, Mamdani celebrated securing state funds for illegal immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling it one of his “greatest victories.” He has also drawn criticism for advocating the abolition of private property and prisons.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A new large-cohort retrospective study published in the Biomarker Research journal suggests a possible connection between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of developing specific types of cancers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED:Biomarker Research, medical researchers in South Korea, and healthdata from 8,407,849 South Koreans obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Published September 26, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers.” — Kim et al. Biomarker Research (2025)
🎯IMPACT: While the study found “epidemiological associations between the cumulative incidence of cancers and COVID-19 vaccination, which varied by sex, age, and vaccine type,” the authors stressed that “further studies are warranted to elucidate potential causal relationships.”
IN FULL
A group of medical researchers in South Korea has published a large-cohort retrospective study based on 8,407,849 people to determine the risk of cancer for those who received COVID-19 vaccines. The study’s authors noted that “COVID-19 vaccines might be associated with cancer risks.”
“Our data showed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased the risk of six cancer types, namely, thyroid (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.51), gastric (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.58), colorectal (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12–1.47), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.25–1.87), breast (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07–1.34), and prostate (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.35–2.11) cancers,” the South Korean study found—using data from the Korean National Health Insurance database.
Notably, mRNA, cDNA, and heterologous vaccination were found to be linked to the development of distinct types of cancer. “In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers,” the study states. Additionally, the authors found that men who received COVID-19 vaccinations saw increased rates of gastric and lung cancers, while women saw increased rates of thyroid and colorectal cancers.
The researchers also found that under-65s are more “vulnerable to thyroid and breast cancers,” while those over 65 years of age are at higher risk of prostate cancer. Additionally, the study found that the type and number of vaccine boosters may also impact the degree of risk and type of cancer that can develop.
While the study, published in the Biomarker Research journal, stated that its data “suggest[s] epidemiological associations between the cumulative incidence of cancers and COVID-19 vaccination, which varied by sex, age, and vaccine type,” the authors stressed that “further studies are warranted to elucidate potential causal relationships.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. military officials are considering air strikes targeting drug traffickers inside Venezuela, potentially beginning in a matter of weeks.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, U.S. military officials, Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, and intermediaries from allied nations.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Discussions are ongoing, with possible strikes in Venezuela in the coming weeks.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Venezuela is sending us their gang members, their drug dealers, and drugs. It’s not acceptable.” – President Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: Potential escalation in U.S. military operations against drug trafficking and increased pressure on Venezuela’s leadership.
IN FULL
The U.S. military is reportedly preparing plans to strike drug traffickers within Venezuela, with operations potentially beginning in a few weeks. This development comes as part of the Trump administration’s intensified focus on combating drug trafficking and addressing its concerns with the Venezuelan government under dictator Nicolás Maduro.
In recent weeks, U.S. forces have already targeted Venezuelan vessels involved in drug trafficking. President Donald J. Trump announced these actions on Truth Social and directed a larger contingent of U.S. air and naval power to be deployed to the Caribbean. Dominican Republic officials confirmed that drugs were recovered after one such strike.
The proposed plans reportedly include drone strikes targeting drug labs and leadership within trafficking organizations. Discussions also highlight frustrations with Maduro’s perceived failure to curb illegal drug flows out of Venezuela. Trump has repeatedly argued, “Venezuela is sending us their gang members, their drug dealers, and drugs. It’s not acceptable.”
A significant number of U.S. military aircraft have been moved to Puerto Rico, signaling readiness for further operations. However, prolonged deployments could strain other military commitments.
The Trump administration has not ruled out regime change as a potential outcome of its strategy, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly advocating for increased pressure on Maduro. Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts continue, with intermediaries facilitating discussions between the U.S. and Venezuela. Maduro has denied involvement in drug trafficking and has accused the U.S. of attempting to undermine his government.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: National Health Service (NHS) guidance suggested there are benefits to first-cousin marriage—highly prevalent among Africans, Pakistanis, and other minority groups in Britain—despite the risk of birth defects.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: NHS England, Dr. Patrick Nash, and the Genomics Education Programme.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Guidance published by NHS England last week.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Our NHS should stop taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices.” – Richard Holden MP
🎯IMPACT: The NHS is being pressured to apologize and withdraw the guidance, amid increasing debate over cousin marriage laws.
IN FULL
Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) has come under fire for guidance that highlights supposed benefits of first-cousin marriage—highly prevalent among Africans, Pakistanis, and other ethnic minority groups in Britain—despite the well-documented risks of birth defects. The guidance from NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme claims such marriages offer “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages.”
Critics, including Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Richard Holden, have condemned the NHS for endorsing what they see as a harmful practice. Holden remarked, “Our NHS should stop taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices.” He further criticized Britain’s governing Labour Party for ignoring calls to end cousin marriage as a means of deterring chain migration—although the Conservatives did not end it during their 14 years in office from 2010 to mid-2024, either.
Dr. Patrick Nash, a religious law expert, described the NHS guidance as “truly dismaying,” arguing that cousin marriage is akin to incest and should be banned. He called for the guidance to be retracted and for an apology to be issued to prevent public misinformation.
The NHS acknowledged the increased risk of genetic conditions in the children of first-cousin spouses, but downplayed it by comparing it to the risks associated with drinking alcohol or smoking while pregnant or having children at a later age, none of which are prohibited.
Cousin marriage is also linked to lower IQ and an elevated risk of psychosis.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
