More than 17,000 asylum seekers, whose claims have been withdrawn, are unaccounted for according to Britain’s Home Office (interior ministry). The announcement came during an evidence hearing before the Commons Home Affairs Committee, which has been investigating the significant backlog of pending asylum claims.
The Home Office disclosed that 17,316 asylum applications were withdrawn between September of last year and this year, a fourfold increase from 4,260 the previous year. This comes in light of Prime Minister’s directives to clear “legacy” cases, or asylum applications submitted before June 28, 2022, by the end of December. In response to these figures, committee member Tim Loughton asked, “Isn’t it strange that… there has been a three-fold increase (in withdrawals) for undetermined reasons, people magically not going forward with their claims, and where are those people?”
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Simon Ridley, the interim second permanent secretary at the Home Office replied, “In most cases, I don’t know where those people are.”
When pressed for clarification, Ridley further admitted, “I don’t think we know where all those people are, no.” As of October 29, the backlog of pending asylum applications, not individuals, was at 122,585, down 12 percent from a record 138,782 at the end of February. The “legacy” backlog stood at 33,253, nearly half of 62,157 on July 30.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Netflix has cast a non-white actor to play a historic Swedish king in a new drama series.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Actor Jihad Abdallah, who now goes by Alexander Abdallah, and Netflix.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced in September 2025, drama set in 18th-century Stockholm, Sweden.
🎯IMPACT: The casting reflects an ongoing trend of casting non-white actors as white historical figures, possibly influenced by award criteria pressuring filmmakers to force diversity into inappropriate settings.
IN FULL
Actor Jihad Abdallah, who goes by Alexander Abdallah, will portray King Gustav III of Sweden, a historical figure who was a white man, in Netflix’s upcoming romantic drama series The Von Fersens, set in 18th-century Stockholm, Sweden.
This casting decision follows previous instances where Netflix has cast non-white actors to portray white historical figures with diverse actors, including Edward VI of England, who was portrayed as a gay black man in a wheelchair, and the last pagan king of Norway, who was portrayed as a black woman.
The casting may have been in response to Hollywood’s efforts to force diversity into all productions, even ones based in historic settings where it would be inappropriate, by making eligibility for certain awards dependent on minority representation.
Forced diversity is also increasingly common beyond the entertainment world. For instance, Britain’s BBC, funded by a compulsory television licence, has produced history education content for children, claiming falsely that black people have always been a significant presence in the country, and certain artificial intelligence (AI) image generators, such as Adobe Firefly, have often portrayed historically white people as other races, including America’s Founding Fathers.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Spirit Airlines flight drew criticism from air traffic control for flying too close to Air Force One.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Spirit Airlines Flight 1300 pilots, Air Force One, air traffic controllers, and President Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Over Long Island, New York, on Tuesday as Air Force One headed to the United Kingdom for a state visit.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Pay attention. Get off the iPad.” – Air traffic controller
🎯IMPACT: Air traffic control ensured the Spirit flight maintained safe distance, with no further incidents reported.
IN FULL
A Spirit Airlines flight drew the ire of air traffic controllers after it flew too close to Air Force One on Tuesday. The incident occurred as President Donald J. Trump was en route to the United Kingdom for a state visit.
The Air Force One, a VC-25A variant of the Boeing 747, had taken off from Joint Base Andrews and was flying over Long Island, New York. Spirit Airlines Flight 1300, an Airbus A321 traveling from Fort Lauderdale to Boston, was also in the area.
An air traffic controller instructed Spirit 1300 to adjust its course, saying, “Spirit 1300, turn 20 degrees right. Pay attention, Spirit 1300, turn 20 degrees right.” The controller repeated directives multiple times, expressing frustration when the pilots did not immediately respond. “Traffic’s off your left wing by six miles or eight miles. 747, I’m sure you can see who it is,” the controller added, emphasizing, “Keep an eye out for him, he’s white and blue.”
The planes crossed paths over Long Island Sound, with the Spirit Airlines flight 9,000 feet below Air Force One. The controller chastised the pilots further, saying, “I got to talk to you twice every time? Pay attention. Get off the iPad.”
AIR FORCE ONE and Spirit Airlines flt NK1300 got too close over Long Island, New York for Air Traffic Control and get’s yelled at including getting told “GET OFF THE IPAD”! 😂
Spirit Airlines later stated, “Spirit Airlines flight 1300 followed procedures and Air Traffic Control instructions while en route to Boston and landed uneventfully. Safety is always our top priority.”
Air Force One landed safely at London Stansted Airport, and President Trump proceeded with his state visit, which includes meetings with King Charles III and announcements of majortech investments.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A driver crashed into a metal gate at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Pittsburgh field office in what authorities are calling an “act of terror.”
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: A suspect identified as Donald Henson of Penn Hills, Pennsylvania, allegedly carried out the attack.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred at around 2:40 AM on Wednesday at the FBI Pittsburgh field office.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We look at this as an act of terror against the FBI,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Christopher Giordano.
🎯IMPACT: The suspect fled on foot and remains at large, prompting an ongoing investigation. No injuries were reported.
IN FULL
A driver identified as Donald Henson of Penn Hills, Pennsylvania, crashed a white Toyota sedan into the metal gate of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Pittsburgh field office early Wednesday morning in what authorities are describing as an “act of terror.” According to FBI Special Agent in Charge Christopher Giordano, Henson exited the vehicle after the crash, retrieved an American flag from inside the car, and threw it over the gate.
The incident occurred at approximately 2:40 AM, and Henson fled the scene on foot. Authorities noted that it is unclear whether he was armed during the attack. No FBI personnel were injured.
“We look at this as an act of terror against the FBI,” Giordano stated during a press briefing before continuing: “This was a targeted attack on this building.” He added that Henson is wanted in connection with the crime, which is a federal offense, and that prosecutors will pursue the matter to the fullest extent of the law.
Henson, described as a former military member, may have been experiencing mental health issues, according to officials. Giordano also mentioned that Henson had visited the field office weeks earlier to file a complaint that “didn’t make a whole lot of sense.” Despite this, the FBI reviewed the matter and later informed Henson that no federal crime had been identified.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump were welcomed to Britain for a historic second state visit, beginning with a royal greeting at Windsor Castle.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED:Donald Trump, Melania Trump, King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Prince William, Princess Catherine, and other members of the Royal Family.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 17, 2025, at Windsor Castle and its surrounding estate.
💬KEY QUOTE: “He’s been a friend of mine for a long time, and everybody respects him, and they love him.” – Donald Trump on King Charles III.
🎯IMPACT: The visit highlighted the “special relationship” between the United States and its mother country, the United Kingdom, marked by unprecedented ceremonial displays and significant bilateral agreements.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump arrived in the United Kingdom today for their second state visit, kicking off with a warm royal welcome at Windsor Castle. The Prince and Princess of Wales greeted the couple as they touched down by helicopter in the castle’s Walled Garden. A lip reader caught Trump telling Princess Catherine, also known as Kate, “You’re beautiful,” as they exchanged pleasantries.
King Charles III and Queen Camilla joined the Trumps outside Victoria House, setting the stage for a grand carriage procession through the castle grounds. The event featured the Band of the Household Cavalry, a Guard of Honour for inspection, and a 41-gun salute fired by The King’s Troop Royal Horse Artillery, echoed by a simultaneous salute at the Tower of London.
King Charles and Trump shared a carriage, with Queen Camilla and Melania Trump following closely behind. The procession included an impressive 1,300 British military personnel from the Royal Navy, Army, and Royal Air Force, making it the largest ceremonial welcome for a state visit in recent history.
Later, the Trumps were invited to view a special exhibit of U.S.-related items from the Royal Collection. The day’s itinerary also included a private moment at St. George’s Chapel, where the couple planned to lay a wreath at Queen Elizabeth II’s tomb. The evening will wrap up with a state banquet in St. George’s Hall, where both King Charles and Trump are set to give speeches.
The visit highlights the deep bond between America and Britain, strengthened by new agreements like a £31 billion (~$42.3 billion) “tech prosperity deal” focused on boosting Britain’s AI and nuclear power sectors. Trump called the visit a “great honor” and celebrated the enduring friendship between the two nations.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, has called for sweeping measures against the leftist political apparatus following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Raheem Kassam. Charlie Kirk, far-left extremists, and their allies in media, academia, and politics.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Kassam made his remarks this past weekend at the Hoosier Leadership Summit, hosted by Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) in Indianapolis.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Don’t forget that these are not your friends. These are not people you can necessarily coexist with.” – Raheem Kassam.
🎯IMPACT: Kassam’s call echoes similar calls from Vice President J.D. Vance, Stephen Miller, and others in the America First movement to fight back against the violence of left-wing extremism and those who aid and support it.
IN FULL
This past weekend, The National Pulse Editor‑in‑Chief Raheem Kassam issued a forceful statement accusing left-leaning media outlets, politicians, and activists of demonizing conservatives and Christians both before and after the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
Speaking at the Hoosier Leadership Summit, hosted by Senator Jim Banks (R-IN) in Indianapolis, Kassam warned that the United States is facing “a latent terror network” and demanded legal and political consequences for those who have supported or enabled domestic violence and threats.
Kassam said that on January 6, he walked through crowds in the U.S. Capitol and watched people being targeted “just for peacefully praying in the halls of their Congress.” He added that he was put on two subpoena lists simply for having been around the Capitol that day and receiving e-mails about verifying votes correctly. He declared, “They cast a wide net, and we must cast a wider one.”
Kassam also sharply criticized news organizations such as MSNBC and CNN, accusing them of having “given material support and succor to a domestic terror faction.” He emphasized, “Don’t forget that these are not your friends. These are not people you can necessarily coexist with.”
“They have been demonizing us for speaking up for constitutional values, for Christian values, for so long now that what happened this week was, unfortunately, inevitable,” Kassam said.
“So I want to see all of them hauled before the committees. I want to see all of them hauled before the FBI and made to account for every single cent. George Soros, Alex Soros, the Ford Foundations—all of it. Every single one,” he continued, adding: “If one penny ended up in the pockets of somebody who has championed violence and championed threats, then there has to be legal recourse.”
The National Pulse chief said it is time to revive an early MAGA movement phrase left “forgotten for too long,” namely: “Lock them up.”
WATCH:
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former Biden government disinformation czar Nina Jankowicz has officially lost her long-shot defamation lawsuit against Fox News, after an attempt to appeal a lower ruling to dismiss the case failed.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nina Jankowicz, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and Fox News.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday, September 15, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m writing with bad news: my appeal of the lower court’s decision to grant Fox’s motion to dismiss was not successful. This marks the end of my defamation suit against Fox, but not the end of my fight for the truth.” — Nina Jankowicz
🎯IMPACT: While it is unclear—other than attorney’s fees—what additional legal or financial exposure Jankowicz has, she has informed her readers that she’s renaming her GoFundMe page to the “Nina Jankowicz Legal Fund” even though it appears to still be just a standard GoFundMe and not a formally filed Legal Defense Fund.
IN FULL
Former Biden government disinformation czar Nina Jankowicz has officially lost her long-shot defamation lawsuit against Fox News, after an attempt to appeal a lower ruling to dismiss the case failed. Jankowicz, a former official with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) who oversaw efforts to root out supposed “disinformation” in the media, attempted to sue the Fox News network, alleging they had defamed her in their description of her work and the circumstances of her removal from DHS.
“I’m writing with bad news: my appeal of the lower court’s decision to grant Fox’s motion to dismiss was not successful. This marks the end of my defamation suit against Fox, but not the end of my fight for the truth,” Jankowicz wrote in a post on Substack, going on to engage in an astounding degree of legal disinformation herself: “Since I resigned my appointment at DHS 40 months ago, I have become well-acquainted with an American justice system that too often protects offenders instead of victims. It is a justice system that, in this crucial moment, doesn’t seem capable of reconciling decades-old precedent with the realities of violent political rhetoric in the digital age.”
Notably, Jankowicz attempts to skirt the fact that she, as a former government official, is a public figure and the legal bar to defamation is far higher, due to long-standing court precedents to ensure the protection of First Amendment rights. However, Jankowicz continues her play for pitty, arguing: “As the nation reels from the highest profile political assassination in decades, following a year of other high profile acts of political violence, it’s hard not to interpret the Third Circuit’s decision as a shrug: to the suffering Fox’s coverage caused me, to the suffering the network’s lies have caused others, and to our suffering democracy, abdicating the role the courts might play in healing our poisoned political discourse.”
Humorously, given that the court merely upheld long-standing precedent, the former Executive Director of the Disinformation Governance Board at DHS, sometimes dubbed the Ministry of Truth, dabbbles in her own ‘disinformation,’ claiming: “The court has effectively given permission for pundits to baselessly declare open season on people with whom they disagree, making it almost impossible for anyone to serve their country without the fear of being tarred and feathered by a powerful cable news channel with a rabidly devoted audience.”
While it is unclear—other than attorney’s fees—what additional legal or financial exposure Jankowicz has, she has informed her readers that she is renaming her GoFundMe page to the “Nina Jankowicz Legal Fund” even though it appears to still be just a standard GoFundMe and not a formally filed Legal Defense Fund.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: House Republicans are looking to advance a bill that would allow the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of people accused of aiding terrorist groups.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: House Foreign Affairs Chairman Brian Mast (R-FL), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The bill could be advanced during a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing in Washington, D.C., this week.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This bill is not just a reform for today, or for President Trump; it is a lasting framework that will strengthen the State Department and benefit every commander-in-chief who follows.” – Brian Mast
🎯IMPACT: The bill seeks to amend the Passport Act of 1926 to block international travel for those providing “material support” to foreign terrorist organizations, though critics warn it could be misused to silence dissent.
IN FULL
House Republicans are moving to advance a bill titled “No Passports for Terrorists and Traffickers,” which would allow the Secretary of State to revoke the passports of Americans accused of supporting foreign terrorist organizations. Introduced by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast (R-FL), the measure seeks to amend the Passport Act of 1926 to block international travel for those providing “material support” to such groups.
“This bill is not just a reform for today, or for President Trump; it is a lasting framework that will strengthen the State Department and benefit every commander-in-chief who follows,” Mast argues.
The bill defines “material support” broadly, including financial aid, lodging, weapons, transportation, and “expert advice or assistance.” Exceptions are made for medicine and religious materials. Notably, people whose passports are revoked would be allowed to appeal.
The definition of material support was expanded during the Trump administration to include links to international drug trafficking. Supporters of the bill argue it would strengthen national security by restricting the movements of people connected to terrorism or transnational criminal networks.
The highly controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) criticized the proposal, saying it would allow the State Department to unilaterally revoke passports without requiring formal charges or convictions.
The bill comes amid a broader crackdown on people accused of supporting terrorism. In April, a federal judge approved the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a permanent resident and former Columbia University student who organized “pro-Hamas” demonstrations. The Trump administration argued that Khalil’s activism endangered public safety and violated immigration laws. However, just months later, a liberal judge stopped the administration from deporting Khalil and others.
The Trump administration has been dramatically increasing deportation efforts across the board. As of July, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was deporting approximately 1,300 individuals per day, one of the highest rates in U.S. history.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A conservative activist has collected tips on over 51,000 people who celebrated or mocked the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, leading to multiple firings.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ryan Fournier, Students for Trump National Chairman, and thousands of people and companies.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Following Charlie Kirk’s assassination in Utah last Wednesday, with incidents reported across the U.S., including national brands and local businesses.
💬KEY QUOTE: “For years, the left tried to destroy people for simply having conservative values.” – Ryan Fournier
🎯IMPACT: Over 76 individuals have been fired, and Fournier’s efforts have drawn over 300 million views and significant online engagement.
IN FULL
Ryan Fournier, the National Chairman of Students for Trump, is leading a growing online campaign to expose and hold accountable people who celebrated or mocked the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. His efforts, driven primarily through his X (formerly Twitter) account with 1.2 million followers, have already resulted in over 76 people losing their jobs. Fournier says he has received over 51,000 tips and generated over 300 million views across his platforms.
“For years, the left tried to destroy people for simply having conservative values,” Fournier said. “They ruined careers, families, livelihoods. But now, we are fighting back.”
Among those fired is Apple employee Cody Ikerd. An Old Navy worker who identified with “she/they/enby/transfem” pronouns was also terminated after posting “Rest in piss, scum.” Other cases include a fitness instructor in Scottsdale, Arizona, and a school educator in Arkansas who also faced consequences for their online remarks.
The campaign has spilled into the political realm as well. Palmetto Bay, Florida Council Member Steve Cody is under pressure to resign following a post that read, “Charlie Kirk is a fitting sacrifice to our Lords: Smith & Wesson. Hallowed be their names.” Florida Republican lawmakers Carlos Gimenez and Omar Blanco have called for Cody to step down, saying the comments are unfit for someone in elected office.
While critics have accused Fournier of leading a “cancel culture” crusade, he argues his campaign is about accountability. “This is not cancel culture,” he said. “This is consequence culture. You want to praise an assassination? Fine. But don’t cry when your boss, your school board, or your community finds out what kind of sick, soulless person you really are.”
Reactions to Kirk’s murder have been deeply polarized. Karen Attiah, a former Washington Post columnist, was fired after posting on Bluesky that she would not engage in “performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence.” She also criticized the public expectation to show sympathy, saying such responses to figures like Kirk were part of what makes America violent.
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and far-left immigrant journalist Mehdi Hasan also drew attention during a post-assassination discussion where they criticized Kirk’s legacy and laughed at him being described as a champion of civil debate. Their remarks prompted Republican members of Congress to introduce measures calling for Omar’s censure and removal from committee assignments.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Declassified documents reveal connections between former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey, Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), and leaks of classified information aimed at smearing President Donald J. Trump as colluding with Russia.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: James Comey, Sen. Schiff, reporters Ellen Nakashima and Michael Schmidt, and several Schiff staffers, including Rheanne Wirkkala and Timothy Bergreen.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Events occurred primarily in 2017, with leaks tied to Washington D.C. media and government offices.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Leaking the information was one way to topple the administration.” — FBI source on Schiff’s alleged actions said in 2017.
🎯IMPACT: The leaks contributed to the Russiagate narrative, undermined Trump, and led to Pulitzer-winning stories later debunked as false.
IN FULL
Newly declassified Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents suggest that senior congressional staffers working for Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), then a member of the House of Representatives, coordinated with intelligence officials and journalists to leak classified or sensitive information during the early months of the first Trump administration—actions some FBI sources believe were aimed at undermining the presidency.
The documents include FBI interview summaries (“302s”) with a whistleblower who served on the House Intelligence Committee for over a decade. According to the whistleblower, Schiff’s office formed a “Russia team” in early 2017 that selectively funneled intelligence to the press through intermediaries, including staff spouses who were reporters.
A February 13, 2017, meeting is cited as a key moment, where Schiff allegedly instructed aides to “leak classified derogatory information” about Trump to “friendly” journalists. Among the staffers named are Rheanne Wirkkala, Michael Bahar, Timothy Bergreen, and Patrick Boland.
The whistleblower told the FBI that Wirkkala “used her husband, a national security reporter, as a cut-out to provide classified information to journalists, including Ellen Nakashima at the Washington Post.” The documents note that several published stories closely mirrored intelligence that had only just been shared with the committee.
“Leaking the information was one way to topple the administration,” the source said, adding, “Everything is directed at Trump and trying to get him impeached.”
The revelations emerge from one of at least seven FBI leak investigations launched between 2017 and 2020. However, none led to criminal charges. The Justice Department’s Inspector General report, released alongside the FBI files, cites “insufficient evidence” and barriers such as the Speech or Debate Clause that shielded congressional communications from scrutiny.
While the IG acknowledged that some of the whistleblower’s claims could not be corroborated, the report also noted that certain digital records, such as deleted messages, spousal communications, and broader e-mail data, were not obtained during the probe.
Media figures mentioned in the documents include Nakashima, Michael Schmidt of the New York Times, and Shane Harris of the Washington Post, among others. The whistleblower alleged these journalists received “curated” leaks from intelligence staffers or their proxies.
Current FBI Director Kash Patel is reportedly reviewing whether to reopen several leak cases. The statute of limitations for unauthorized disclosure of classified information is 10 years, while espionage has no time limit.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: DC Comics canceled a new series by transgender writer Gretchen Felker-Martin after he celebrated the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gretchen Felker-Martin, Charlie Kirk, DC Comics, and Utah State University student Tyler Robinson.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on September 10, 2025, at Utah State University, with DC Comics’ decision following shortly after.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie,” Felker-Martin posted on social media.
🎯IMPACT: DC Comics canceled Felker-Martin’s Red Hood series after one issue and offered credits for unsold copies.
IN FULL
Gretchen Felker‑Martin, a transgender horror author, has lost a publishing deal with DC Comics, behind franchises such as Batman and Superman, following a social media post mocking the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Felker‑Martin, who was set to release a new comic book series titled Red Hood, responded to news of Kirk’s death by writing, “Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie.”
The post sparked swift backlash, and DC Comics quickly moved to cancel the series after only the first issue had been released. The company issued a statement saying, “Posts or public comments that can be viewed as promoting hostility or violence are inconsistent with DC’s standards of conduct.” Retailers were offered credit for any unsold copies.
Kirk was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking at Utah State University. The suspect, Tyler Robinson, a student whose boyfriend is transgender, was taken into custody and charged with murder.
Felker‑Martin, a man who poses as a woman, later defended his remarks in an essay published on Patreon. He described Kirk as “evil” and alleged that “His cruelty will linger like a bad smell for decades to come.” He added that He regretted not taking that cruelty more seriously when others tried to raise the issue. Felker‑Martin is no stranger to controversy. In 2022, he authored a horror novel depicting author J.K. Rowling burning to death, and in 2023, he made inflammatory public comments accusing several writers of being transphobic.
The fallout from Kirk’s assassination has extended far beyond Felker‑Martin. People in media, government, education, and academia have faced disciplinary actions or been terminated for making similar remarks about Kirk’s death. For instance, Matthew Dowd, a political analyst at MSNBC, was fired after he said on air that “hateful thoughts lead to hateful words which ultimately lead to hateful actions,” a statement the network deemed inappropriate and insensitive.
Karen Attiah, a former columnist at The Washington Post, confirmed she had been fired for posts on Bluesky that were labeled “gross misconduct” by the paper. A U.S. Secret Service agent was also suspended after allegedly posting celebratory messages about the killing, while a FEMA employee and an assistant dean at Middle Tennessee State University also lost their jobs following comments seen as condoning or mocking Kirk’s assassination.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
