❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States federal government could be forced to refund an estimated $168 billion in tariff payments to businesses if the Supreme Court rules that President Donald J. Trump improperly invoked an emergency powers law to impose the trade levies.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, U.S. businesses, and Supreme Court justices.

📍WHEN & WHERE: A Supreme Court hearing in November, with potential implications for tariffs enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

💬KEY QUOTE: President Trump has called the pending Supreme Court ruling “literally, LIFE OR DEATH for our country.”

🎯IMPACT: A ruling against the tariffs could lead to refunds, potentially increasing federal debt.

The United States federal government could end up owing businesses upwards of $168 billion should the Supreme Court rule that President Donald J. Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on dozens of countries is unlawful. Notably, U.S. Treasury Department data indicates the Trump administration has collected $259 billion in tariff revenue through December 5, though not all of those collections stem from trade levies imposed under IEEPA authority.

Several of the Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical of the legality of President Trump’s use of the IEEPA to impose broad, global tariffs during oral arguments in November. The justices noted that the emergency law does not explicitly mention tariffs in its language, and its use to impose trade levies lacks prior precedent.

President Trump has called the pending case before the high court “literally, LIFE OR DEATH for our country,” adding that without the tariffs, the U.S. is “virtually defenseless against other countries who have, for years, taken advantage of us.” The Trump administration has consistently argued that the IEEPA grants the president broad powers to counter “unusual and extraordinary threats,” and that the levies serve as a critical tool for boosting U.S. manufacturing, creating jobs, and reducing the trade deficit. When he enacted the tariffs in April, President Trump argued that foreign trade deficits constituted a “national security crisis,” enabling him to invoke the emergency provisions under the IEEPA.

Notably, the U.S. trade deficit fell sharply in September due to the tariffs, declining 10.9 percent to $52.8 billion. Additionally, the bilateral trade deficit with China narrowed by $4.0 billion to $11.4 billion in September, as Chinese imports fell and U.S. exports to China rose slightly.

The National Pulse reported earlier this week that Chinese Premier Li Qiang—the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) second most powerful leader next to President Xi Jinping—claimed global trade tariffs have dealt a “severe blow” to the world economy. Implicit in Li’s remarks is the admission that U.S. tariffs enacted by the Trump administration have caused a significant negative impact on China’s export economy, which is highly reliant on selling goods to American consumers. Data released by Chinese customs officials shows that exports to the United States year-on-year fell by 28.7 percent in November.

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.