Thursday, September 18, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

WATCH: Biden Says Presidential Legacy is Ending War in Vietnam (Which Ended 48 Years Ago).

Joe Biden appeared to indicate that he wants his presidential legacy to be that he reduced the prospect of war in Vietnam.

Biden’s comments came during an interview on Mexican-American network TelevisaUnivision. “Well, I hope the legacy is that I kept my word that I said that the reason I was running was to help change the life of ordinary people and reduce the prospect of war, because of Vietnam.”

The Vietnam War ended 48 years ago, in 1975, just over two years after Biden first assumed his seat in the U.S. Senate. When Biden was first campaigning for the Senate in 1972, he did not run on an anti-war platform. In his own words, he was “not big on flak jackets and tie-dye shirts” and professed a “lack of moral outrage” about the war.

The octogenarian president has faced increasingly widespread concerns over his mental faculties. Just this week, Biden appeared to forget his own name during a speech in Washington, D.C.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Democrats Remove Post Mocking Assassination of Charlie Kirk.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Yakima County Democrats faced backlash for posting a Facebook message mocking Charlie Kirk shortly after his assassination.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Yakima County Democrats, Charlie Kirk, Yakima County Party Chair Soneya Lund, and Kelso City Councilman Jim Hill.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Washington State, in the days following Kirk’s assassination.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Our deepest apologies for our oversight and insensitivity.” – Soneya Lund

🎯IMPACT: The incident highlights growing hostility and political tensions in Washington State following Kirk’s death, with additional controversies erupting across the state.

IN FULL

The Yakima County Democratic Party in Washington State is facing continued backlash over a social media post mocking the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk. “Blah blah blah Charlie Kirk hmm hmm hmm radicalized nada nada nada facists [sic],” the county party wrote in a now-deleted Facebook post following Kirk’s death, allegedly at the hands of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, motivated by far-left politics and transgender ideology.

Soneya Lund, the chair of the Yakima County Democratic Party, issued an apology after Washington State residents began objecting to the post, claiming a volunteer had written the unauthorized message. “The Yakima Democrats do not condone violence of any sort, political or not. While we may not agree with an individual’s political stance, we 100% support their rights to vocalize them. Again, our thoughts and prayers are with [Erika] Kirk and their young children. … Our deepest apologies for our oversight and insensitivity,” Lund said.

Notably, the Yakima County incident is just the latest in Washington State in the fallout of Kirk’s assassination. Kelso, Washington, city councilman Jim Hill drew national attention and criticism over a post on a local news website in which he dismissed Kirk as a “podcaster” who “became rich and recognized because his lips were firmly attached to Trump’s behind.”

“The fact in my humble opinion is this. There is one less voice to promote Trump’s agenda. Where Trump and his minions want our Country to go. Perhaps it’s a good thing his voice was silenced,” Hill wrote.

He added, “Assassinations are going to continue. That there is unprecedented hate, I think, is out there. And guns are going to be the answer, to whether we continue to seek the ideals of our Constitution, continue our search for a better nation on one side, or Trumpism wins out.”

The comments received almost immediate pushback, with numerous individuals arguing that Hill was justifying political violence and encouraging further attacks.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Judge Blocks Deportation of Hundreds of Guatemalans.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from deporting certain Guatemalan minors.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Judge Timothy Kelly, the Trump administration, the Guatemalan minors, and their attorneys.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The order was issued on Thursday, following a Labor Day weekend action where minors were moved to a plane bound for Guatemala, but an emergency order blocked their deportation.

🎯IMPACT: The decision halts the deportation of these minors indefinitely, though the Trump administration is likely to appeal.

IN FULL

On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Kelly issued an order blocking the deportation of a groups of Guatemalan minors, citing potential harm if they were returned to their home country. The case arose after federal authorities moved 70 minors, aged 10 to 17, from Health and Human Services (HHS) custody to a plane bound for Guatemala over Labor Day weekend, with plans to deport over 600 in total.

The Trump administration initially claimed the minors were being reunited with their parents, but declarations from the minors alleged fears of violence or neglect upon their return. A report from the Guatemalan attorney general’s office, submitted to the court, confirmed that no parents had requested the return of their children. “I don’t have anything specific that I can refer to contest the Guatemalan AG’s report,” said Sarah Welch, a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.

Attorneys for the migrants secured an emergency restraining order from District Court Judge Sparkle Sooknanan during Labor Day weekend, which was later extended indefinitely by Judge Kelly. The attorneys argued that trafficking and immigration laws prohibit unaccompanied children from being deported in such a manner, especially when some have pending asylum cases or unresolved legal claims.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized the initial restraining order, claiming it prevented the reunification of children with their families. “Judge Sparkle [Sooknanan] is blocking flights to *reunify* Guatemalan children with their families,” McLaughlin wrote on social media. She added, “Now these children have to go to shelters. This is disgusting and immoral.”

The minors remain in HHS custody without legal guardians in the United States. The Trump administration is likely to appeal the decision.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Erika Kirk Named CEO and Board Chairman of Turning Point USA.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika, has been announced as the new CEO and Chairman of the Board for Turning Point USA (TPUSA) following his assassination in Utah last Wednesday.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk, and the board members of Turning Point USA.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Statement written on September 17, 2025, shared on X (formerly Twitter) on September 18, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We will not surrender or kneel before evil. We will carry on. The attempt to destroy Charlie’s work will become our chance to make it more powerful and enduring than ever before.” – TPUSA statement

🎯IMPACT: Turning Point USA aims to continue its mission and strengthen its influence.

IN FULL

Turning Point USA (TPUSA) has announced Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, as the new CEO and Chairman of the Board following the assassination of her husband in Utah last Wednesday. The conservative youth organization shared a September 17, 2025 statement on the leadership change on X (formerly Twitter) on September 18, noting, “In prior discussions, Charlie expressed to multiple executives that this is what he wanted in the event of his death.”

In a message reflecting on the challenges TPUSA faces, the announcement drew on the wisdom of King Solomon, stressing that the current times are a test that the organization is equipped to overcome.

“All of us at Turning Point USA have a special role in carrying Charlie Kirk’s mantle and completing his vision of bringing us all closer to our Lord and fostering a prosperous country for generations to come,” the statement reads, adding: “As Charlie always said, ‘We have a country to save.’ We will not surrender or kneel before evil. We will carry on. The attempt to destroy Charlie’s work will become our chance to make it more powerful and enduring than ever before.”

The message concluded with blessings for Erika Kirk, the Kirk family, and the entire team at Turning Point USA.

A memorial service for Kirk, to be attended by President Donald J. Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other leaders is slated for State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on Sunday.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump and Starmer Sign Historic British-American Tech Investment Deal.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. President Donald J. Trump and British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer signed a U.S.-UK Tech Prosperity Deal at the latter’s Chequers estate, marking a significant step in cooperation on artificial intelligence (AI) and technology investments.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Prime Minister Starmer, and business leaders, including representatives from Nvidia, Microsoft, and BlackRock.

📍WHEN & WHERE: September 18, 2025, at Chequers, the Prime Minister’s country retreat in Buckinghamshire, England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This agreement will also help America and our British allies dominate the future of artificial intelligence.” — President Trump

🎯IMPACT: The partnership is expected to generate significant economic growth, with £250 billion (~$339 billion) of investment and 15,000 jobs created across the United Kingdom.

IN FULL

U.S. President Donald J. Trump and British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have signed a U.S.-UK Tech Prosperity Deal at Chequers, the Prime Minister’s official country residence. The agreement focuses on fostering cooperation in artificial intelligence (AI) and technology, with both leaders emphasizing the “unbreakable bond” between the two nations.

Business leaders from major corporations such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Rolls-Royce, and BlackRock were present for the signing. The deal includes a £250 (~$339 billion) investment flowing between the U.S. and the United Kingdom, projected to create tens of thousands of jobs in both countries. The leaders also highlighted the importance of energy and infrastructure to support AI advancements.

President Trump stated, “This agreement will also help America and our British allies dominate the future of artificial intelligence. You need the energy; you have to have the energy. That’s one thing I learned very quickly.” He also reiterated his belief that the U.S. is “leading China and the world by a lot” in AI technology.

Prime Minister Starmer expressed pride in the United Kingdom’s status in the field, stating, “We have the only trillion-dollar tech sector in the West outside of the U.S. That’s what we bring to the table, and we are proud of it.” He added that the British-American partnership would “deliver more for working people” and strengthen the economic ties between the two nations.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Judge Faces Ethics Reprimand for Making Almost a Thousand Democrat Donations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Florida judge made hundreds of political donations totaling around $29,000 to Democrat-aligned organizations or candidates, violating judicial ethics rules.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Judge Diana Tennis and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Donations were made since 2016; the case was filed at the Florida Supreme Court on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Judge Tennis admitted to her misconduct and has cooperated with the Commission in all respects during this inquiry. She has expressed deep regret that her conduct could have eroded the public’s perception of the integrity of the judiciary and judicial elections.” – Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission

🎯IMPACT: The case raises concerns about judicial impartiality, and the Florida Supreme Court will determine whether to approve a recommended public reprimand.

IN FULL

A Florida judge is facing disciplinary action for illicit political contributions barred under state ethics rules. According to a filing made earlier this week, Judge Diana Tennis made over 900 donations totaling approximately $29,000 to Democrat-aligned organizations and candidates. These donations, according to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, violated judicial ethics rules outlined in Canons 1, 2A, and 7A (1)(e), which prohibit judges from making political contributions.

The commission noted that while other judges have made political donations, Tennis was described as “far and away the most prolific offender” in both the number of contributions and the total amount given. The organizations and campaigns receiving her donations included Democratic congressional candidates, pro-abortion PACs, and Joe Biden‘s presidential campaign.

Tennis expressed remorse for her actions, claiming that she misunderstood the rules and believed the prohibition only applied to state-level candidates. She also stated that some donations were unintentionally authorized as recurring payments or split into multiple entries by platforms or committees. Despite her explanations, the commission emphasized that her actions could undermine public trust in the judiciary.

In light of her cooperation and lack of prior disciplinary history, the commission recommended a public reprimand. “Judge Tennis admitted to her misconduct and has cooperated with the Commission in all respects during this inquiry. She has expressed deep regret that her conduct could have eroded the public’s perception of the integrity of the judiciary and judicial elections,” the commission said in its filing.

The Florida Supreme Court will now review and approve the recommendation. If accepted, Tennis will receive a public reprimand. If rejected, the case could proceed to a full hearing before the Judicial Qualifications Commission.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Kamala Confirms Walz Was a Diversity Hire, Wanted Buttigieg.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has revealed Pete Buttigieg was her first choice for running mate but deemed it “too big of a risk.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Tim Walz.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Excerpt from Harris’s upcoming book 107 Days, set to release September 23.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.” – Kamala Harris

🎯IMPACT: Harris ultimately chose Tim Walz as her running mate, losing to President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in the election.

IN FULL

Pete Buttigieg was former Vice President Kamala Harris‘s “first choice” to be her running mate in the 2024 presidential election. The choice of Buttigieg—the homosexual former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, McKinsey consultant, former Secretary of Transportation, and Naval Reserve intelligence officer—was revealed in a newly released excerpt from Harris’s upcoming book, 107 Days, which recalls her disastrous presidential campaign.

Despite Harris’s preference for Buttigieg, she settled on Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) instead, concluding that Buttigieg “was too big of a risk.” Harris wrote that Buttigieg, “would have been an ideal partner—if I were a straight white man.” She added, “But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man.”

“Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk,” Harris wrote. “And I think Pete also knew that—to our mutual sadness.” Harris and Walz, effectively a straight white male diversity hire, went on to lose the 2024 presidential election in a landslide to President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in November.

The excerpt also revealed that Buttigieg initially led Harris’s vetting list for running mates. Harris described him as “a sincere public servant with the rare talent of being able to frame liberal arguments in a way that makes it possible for conservatives to hear them.” She added, “I love Pete. I love working with Pete. He and his husband, Chasten, are friends.”

It is unclear whether Harris’s vetting of Buttigieg uncovered the former Transportation Secretary‘s ties to Patrick Wojahn, a former Democrat mayor of College Park, Maryland, who was sentenced in 2023 to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to dozens of charges relating to the possession of child pornography. The 30-year sentence (150 in total with 120 years suspended) comes after Wojahn reached an agreement with prosecutors, pleading guilty in August to 140 counts related to the possession and distribution of materials depicting child sexual abuse.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Pro-Hamas’ Student CAN Be Deported to Algeria or Syria, Judge Rules.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal immigration judge ordered Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student, to be deported to either Algeria or Syria due to alleged misrepresentations on his green card application.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mahmoud Khalil, Judge Jamee Comans, and the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued last week by a Louisiana-based immigration court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This Court finds that Respondent willfully misrepresented material fact(s) for the sole purpose of circumventing the immigration process,” wrote Judge Comans.

🎯IMPACT: Khalil now faces deportation unless he successfully appeals the decision within 30 days.

IN FULL

A federal immigration judge has ordered Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student who organized pro-Hamas protests, to be deported to Algeria or Syria. The ruling, issued last week, was revealed in court filings by Khalil’s lawyers on Wednesday as part of his ongoing lawsuit against the Trump administration to prevent his removal.

Khalil, a green card holder, has alleged that the Trump administration detained him and sought to deport him as part of a broader policy targeting foreign students involved in protests against Israel. The administration accused him of “hateful behavior and rhetoric.” Judge Jamee Comans denied Khalil’s motion for a waiver to prevent his removal, citing alleged misrepresentations on his green card application.

In her ruling, Comans stated, “This Court finds that Respondent’s lack of candor on his [immigration forms] was not an oversight by an uninformed, uneducated applicant. Rather, this Court finds that Respondent willfully misrepresented material fact(s) for the sole purpose of circumventing the immigration process.”

Khalil’s legal team criticized the decision, describing it as “highly unusual” and claiming procedural irregularities. “It is no surprise that the Trump administration continues to retaliate against me for my exercise of free speech,” Khalil said in a statement.

The Trump administration had initially sought to deport Khalil under a federal law allowing removal if the Secretary of State determines a noncitizen’s presence poses “adverse foreign policy consequences.” A federal judge blocked this attempt earlier in the year. Khalil now has 30 days to appeal the immigration court’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Khalil is currently a citizen of Algeria, but was born in Syria, leaving the two countries as the most reasonable places for Khalil to be deported to.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Three Officers Killed, Two Wounded in ‘Ambush’ Attack.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Three police officers were killed and two others critically injured in an apparent ambush while serving a warrant in North Codorus Township, Pennsylvania.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Five officers, the suspect, and multiple law enforcement agencies including state police.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday, September 17, in North Codorus Township, York County, Pennsylvania, roughly 115 miles west of Philadelphia.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is an absolutely tragic and devastating day. We grieve for the loss of life of three precious souls who served this county, served this commonwealth, served this country.” – Governor Josh Shapiro (D)

🎯IMPACT: The incident marks one of the deadliest days for Pennsylvania police in decades, sparking widespread mourning and ongoing investigations.

IN FULL

In North Codorus Township, Pennsylvania, three police officers were fatally shot and two others critically wounded on Wednesday during an ambush while serving a warrant. The attack occurred during a domestic-related investigation, with a suspect, reportedly the ex-boyfriend of a local resident and dressed in camouflage, firing from a cornfield, officials said. The suspect was killed in the incident.

The two injured officers were airlifted to WellSpan York Hospital, where they remain in critical but stable condition, according to Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Christopher Paris. Governor Josh Shapiro (D), who met with the victims’ families, described the event as a “tragic and devastating day.” On X, he wrote, “These officers represent the very best of us.”

The officers were from the Northern York Regional Police Department and included a York County sheriff’s deputy. The response involved over 30 police vehicles blocking roads in the rural community. A procession honored the fallen officers, with residents waving American flags and leaving flowers at the police headquarters.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi called the attack “a scourge on our society,” noting that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) are aiding the investigation.

Image by Tom Wolf.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Announces ANTIFA as Major Terrorist Organization.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Trump announced the designation of ANTIFA as a major terrorist organization.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump and ANTIFA.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on Truth Social.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Potential investigations into ANTIFA’s funding could follow.

IN FULL

President Donald Trump has taken a significant step by announcing the designation of ANTIFA as a major terrorist organization. This move was revealed through a post on his Truth Social account.

In his statement, Trump described ANTIFA as “A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER” and emphasized the need for this designation.

Furthermore, President Trump indicated that he would strongly recommend thorough investigations into those funding ANTIFA, ensuring that the highest legal standards and practices are upheld.

This announcement is likely to lead to increased scrutiny and potential legal actions against those associated with ANTIFA’s financial backing.

The President expressed gratitude for the attention given to this matter, highlighting the importance of addressing such domestic threats.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ABC Suspends Jimmy Kimmel Indefinitely Following DISGUSTING Comments on Charlie Kirk.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Disney’s ABC has indefinitely removed Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show from the air following his controversial remarks about Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, Nexstar, FCC Chair Brendan Carr, and Charlie Kirk.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made Wednesday evening, affecting ABC-affiliated stations across the country.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct and take actions on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.” – FCC Chair Brendan Carr

🎯IMPACT: Nexstar pulled Kimmel’s show from its ABC-affiliated stations, and the FCC is reviewing the network’s compliance with public-interest standards.

IN FULL

Disney’s ABC has announced that “Jimmy Kimmel Live” will be pre-empted indefinitely following backlash over comments made by the host regarding Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer. An ABC spokesperson confirmed the decision but declined to provide further details.

The controversy stems from remarks Kimmel made during his Monday evening monologue, where he accused the MAGA movement of trying to score political points by distancing itself from the alleged killer, Tyler Robinson. Nexstar, a major operator of ABC-affiliated stations, responded by refusing to broadcast Kimmel’s show, citing objections to his comments.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr criticized Kimmel’s remarks, calling them “the sickest conduct possible” and suggesting the FCC could take measures against ABC affiliates if Disney fails to address the issue. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take actions on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead,” Carr stated during an interview.

The Center for American Rights has filed a complaint with the FCC, arguing that Kimmel’s comments violated public-interest standards. “Disney as ABC’s corporate owner needs to act directly to correct this problem,” said Daniel Suhr, president of the organization.

This incident adds to ongoing tensions between ABC and conservative figures, with Carr previously targeting other ABC programming like “The View” for alleged bias. Meanwhile, Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez defended Kimmel’s First Amendment rights, warning against government overreach in response to controversial speech.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.