Three white policeofficers have succeeded in a discrimination claim after an employment tribunal determined that they were bypassed for a promotion due to their race. The tribunal found that the officers, Detective Inspector Phillip Turner-Robson, Inspector Graham Horton, and Custody Inspector Kirsteen Bishop, faced disadvantage by being excluded from a promotional opportunity within Thames Valley Police.
The tribunal found that in an effort to diversify senior staff, a decision was made to promote an “Asian” sergeant to the rank of detective inspector, bypassing the standard competitive process. Superintendent Emma Baillie made the decision after being directed by Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg to “make it happen.” The move disregarded warnings regarding the legal implications of not following competitive procedures.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
The tribunal heard that in August 2022, plans were in motion to advertise a position for detective inspector in the priority crime team at Aylesbury. DI Turner-Robson expressed interest in the vacancy on the same day. However, by the following month, the superintendent had placed Sergeant Sidhu, whose first name was not mentioned, into the role without any formal promotion process.
At the time of the appointment, Sergeant Sidhu had not yet been promoted to inspector status. Despite this, she was appointed as detective inspector after the decision-makers “jumped the gun,” according to the tribunal. The tribunal noted that the Superintendent’s actions were influenced by a directive to ensure the appointment quickly, which resulted in discrimination.
Employment Judge Robin Postle ruled the decision constituted direct discrimination against the three officers, emphasizing that their right to a fair promotion process was compromised. The judge stated that the actions taken were beyond mere encouragement and disproportionately favored an officer with the protected characteristic of race.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump set the refugee admissions ceiling at 7,500 for fiscal year 2026, the lowest cap on record.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Afrikaners in South Africa, and U.S. government officials.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Determination dated September 30, announced in Washington, D.C.
🎯IMPACT: This decision shifts U.S. refugee policy, focusing on Afrikaners and potentially others, while slashing the annual refugee cap.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has set the refugee admissions ceiling for the 2026 fiscal year at 7,500, the lowest limit in U.S. history. The presidential determination, dated September 30, focuses on admitting South African Afrikaners, a white ethnic minority, citing persecution in their home country. The previous cap, set by former President Joe Biden, was 125,000.
When Trump returned to office in January, he immediately paused all refugee admissions, saying the program would resume only if it served “the best interest of the United States.” The administration soon began prioritizing Afrikaners for resettlement, though only 138 South Africans had been admitted by early September, according to official data. The new refugee plan also extends consideration to “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands.” A leaked internal memo from April suggested that Europeans facing discrimination for opposing mass migration or supporting populist parties could also qualify.
The new refugee limits come amid a broader tightening of immigration enforcement. Southern border crossings have dropped to their lowest level in 55 years, with around 237,000 apprehensions reported this fiscal year, a decline of more than 80 percent. At the U.S.-Canada border, illegal crossings have fallen by roughly 95 percent following a major security crackdown earlier in 2025.
Meanwhile, deportations have accelerated. Federal immigration authorities report that the United States is on track to reach roughly 600,000 removals by the end of the year. Since January 2025, more than half a million illegal immigrants have been deported, and officials say voluntary departures have also risen sharply.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Federal charges were filed against 19 people for operating an open-air drug market in Washington Square Park, Manhattan.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The defendants include Maliek Lugg, John Livigni, and Curtis Miller, among others, with involvement from the Bloods gang.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The charges were unsealed on October 30, 2025, and relate to criminality in Manhattan’s Washington Square Park.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The defendants are aware that their drugs cause overdoses, including in and around the Washington Square Park Area.” – Federal indictment
🎯IMPACT: The federal raid brings to an end the illegal drug operation that led to multiple overdoses, including two deaths last year, with the defendants having been collectively arrested over 80 times prior.
IN FULL
Nineteen people have been federally charged for allegedly operating a blatant, open-air drug market in Manhattan‘s Washington Square Park, dealing fentanyl, heroin, and crack cocaine. This operation has been linked to two deaths in the previous year, including an 18-year-old from Aspen, Colorado, and a 43-year-old homeless person living in the park.
Court documents reveal that the defendants were aware of the overdoses caused by their drugs, yet continued their extensive sales in the area. The sophisticated drug network, involving Bloods gang members, has collectively faced over 80 drug-related charges in the past five years.
Despite previous incarcerations, the drug dealers reportedly resumed their activities upon release. The operation was structured with agreements not to sell in each other’s territories, using different colored bags to distinguish their products.
The first death occurred in June last year when a teenager from Colorado, in New York for a summer internship, overdosed after purchasing drugs. His body was found with a purple bag of drugs. Later, a homeless man’s body was discovered with empty bags linked to dealer John Livigni and the Bloods gang.
Those charged face conspiracy to distribute narcotics resulting in death charges. The indictment includes John Livigni, Curtis Miller, and others involved in the network.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported an 8,000 percent increase in death threats against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: ICE officers and their families are the targets of these threats, as the agency enforces President Donald J. Trump’s mass deportations policy.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The threats have been escalating recently, as reported on October 30 by the DHS.
💬KEY QUOTE: “From bounties placed on their heads for their murders, threats to their families, stalking and doxxing online, our officers are experiencing unprecedented level of violence and threats against them and their families.” – Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
🎯IMPACT: The threats have raised concerns about the safety of immigration enforcement officers and their families, and the role of political leaders in sanctuary jurisdictions in endangering them.
IN FULL
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported an alarming surge in threats and violence directed toward U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, citing an 8,000 percent increase in death threats. Officials describe a climate of escalating hostility toward ICE personnel and their families as the agency enforces President Donald J. Trump’s mass deportation directives.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin underscored the gravity of the situation, stating, “From bounties placed on their heads for their murders, threats to their families, stalking and doxxing online, our officers are experiencing unprecedented level of violence and threats against them and their families.”
She attributed some of the rising hostility to political rhetoric in sanctuary jurisdictions, arguing that “this violence against law enforcement must end.” DHS provided examples, including a social media post from Whatcom County, Washington, urging people to “make life hard for ICE,” as well as reports of a Texas ICE officer’s spouse receiving a threatening phone call.
In recent months, a series of high-profile attacks and threats have underscored the heightened risks ICE officers face. In Texas, gunmen reportedly ambushed an ICE facility using fireworks as a distraction before opening fire on responding officers. In another case, bullet casings marked with the words “Anti-ICE” were discovered near Dallas, suggesting deliberate targeting of federal agents. Federal authorities have also warned that extremist groups have infiltrated lawful protests in cities such as Portland and Los Angeles, using them as cover to vandalize and attack ICE offices.
The situation has prompted political fallout. President Trump recently condemned what he described as organized anti-ICE violence and floated the possibility of legal action against state and local officials who, he claims, refuse to protect federal agents. His comments came amid revelations that some police departments, including in Chicago, had reportedly instructed officers to withdraw support from ICE agents under attack, orders that have drawn harsh criticism from law enforcement groups.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Nearly 37,000 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees are missing paychecks due to the Democrats’ ongoing government shutdown.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Department of Veterans Affairs employees, VA Secretary Doug Collins, Senate Democrats, and Senate Republicans.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The shutdown began October 1, affecting VA operations nationwide, including regional benefits offices and cemeteries.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The Democrats’ government shutdown is limiting services for Veterans and making life miserable for VA employees, and things are only going to get worse as time goes on.” – VA Secretary Doug Collins
🎯IMPACT: Over one million veterans face service backlogs, with offices shuttered and programs like the GI Bill Hotline and Veteran Readiness and Employment program disrupted.
IN FULL
Nearly one-tenth of the Department of Veterans Affairs workforce, or approximately 37,000 employees, are missing paychecks this week due to the Democrats’ ongoing government shutdown. The shutdown, which began on October 1, has led to furloughs or unpaid work for these employees, despite some appropriations still being in place when the shutdown started.
VA Secretary Doug Collins criticized the situation, stating, “The Democrats’ government shutdown is limiting services for Veterans and making life miserable for VA employees, and things are only going to get worse as time goes on.” The VA had already been reducing its workforce earlier this year, expecting to have 455,000 employees by the end of the fiscal year.
The shutdown has resulted in significant disruptions to critical services. Over one million veterans are experiencing backlogs, dozens of regional benefits offices have been closed, and more than 150 VA cemeteries are shuttered, except for burials. Programs like the GI Bill Hotline, which assists nearly 900,000 veterans, and the Veteran Readiness and Employment program, already facing a backlog of 60,000 applications, have been temporarily halted. Only one permanent closure occurred at a benefits office in the Philippines.
Medical care centers and outpatient clinics remain unaffected for now, thanks to advance appropriations from Congress. The VA has confirmed that benefits such as compensation, pension, education, and housing will continue to be processed and delivered.
Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer (D-NY), have blamed the shutdown on Republicans’ refusal to include an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies in the funding bill, but it is the Senate Democrats who have repeatedly blocked GOP spending legislation up to now. Secretary Collins said, “It’s time for Democrats to stop using the suffering of Americans as political leverage to give free health care to illegal immigrants. I call on them to open the government and enable VA to provide the complete and comprehensive services America’s Veterans, families, caregivers, and survivors have earned.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Federal and local authorities in Indiana arrested 223 illegal immigrants, including 146 semi-truck drivers, as part of an operation targeting unlicensed commercial drivers.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Indiana State Police.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The arrests were announced during a news conference in Gary, Indiana, as part of Operation Midway Blitz.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If you are here driving on our streets and highways illegally, you are endangering our citizens, and your days are numbered.” – Kristi Noem
🎯IMPACT: The operation highlights growing concerns over public safety risks posed by illegal immigrant truck drivers and sanctuary jurisdictions issuing commercial driver’s licenses.
IN FULL
A joint operation between federal and local law enforcement in Indiana has resulted in the arrests of 223 illegal immigrants. Among the arrestees are 146 semi-truck drivers, who were operating illegally as commercial drivers on U.S. roadways. The operation and arrests were announced by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem at a press conference in Gary, Indiana, on Thursday.
“If you are here driving on our streets and highways illegally, you are endangering our citizens, and your days are numbered,” Noem stated. She added, “We don’t want any of these individuals on our roads or in our communities, and we especially don’t want them behind the wheel of an 18-wheeler when they can’t speak our language, don’t understand our laws, can’t follow roadway signs, and can’t interact with law enforcement or our citizens.”
The arrests were part of Operation Midway Blitz, a federal immigration enforcement action underway in the greater Chicago area. Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), revealed that many of the drivers arrested had criminal histories, including drug trafficking, assault, drunk driving, and fraud.
A federal crackdown on illegal immigrants receiving commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) has intensified following a number of recent fatal collisions. In one instance, an illegal immigrant driver accused of causing a fatal crash in Florida reportedly failed his CDL test 10 times before receiving a license. Another crash in California involving a semi-truck driver killed three people, raising further questions about sanctuary states issuing CDLs to illegal immigrants.
“It’s unconscionable that illegal aliens have CDLs and are driving 18-wheelers across our nation,” Lyons said. At the same time, DHS emphasized that the operation aimed to target “criminal illegal aliens terrorizing Americans in sanctuary Illinois.” Noem also noted a similar operation in Oklahoma, which has resulted in more than 250 arrests of illegal immigrant truck drivers.
If you can’t speak English and you don’t know how to operate an 18-wheeler — you should not be operating on American highways.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Senate voted to end President Donald Trump’s tariffs in a 51-47 vote.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski joined Democrats to back the measure.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The vote took place on Thursday in the Senate.
🎯IMPACT: President Trump’s authority to impose tariffs remains legally intact, as the Senate bill is highly unlikely to be approved by the House or signed by President Trump. Trade agreements with key partners are already in place.
IN FULL
The Senate voted 51-47 on Thursday to end President Donald J. Trump‘s global reciprocal tariffs, with four Republican senators joining all Democrats in supporting the measure. Two senators did not vote.
Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Rand Paul (R-KY), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) were the Republicans who voted in favor of the Democrat measure to end the tariff emergency. Both McConnell and Paul have openly opposed President Trump’s tariff policies for months, despite mounting evidence that the America First leader’s trade levies have rebalanced international markets and encouraged the reshoring of American jobs.
Despite the Senate vote, the Democrat-led legislation is not expected to take effect. The Republican-controlled House and insufficient Senate support to override an almost certain veto from President Trump make its passage unlikely.
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a challenge to Trump’s tariffs in November, with the government expected to emphasize the foreign policy aspect of trade policy, rooting the levies purely under presidential authority.
In April, Sen. Paul announced he would back Senate Democrats’ anti-tariff efforts, declaring that “Taxation without representation is tyranny”—despite President Trump running on tariffs in 2024 and having a clear mandate from the American people.
Also in Paril, Paul and McConnell joined a Democratic resolution challenging President Trump’s tariffs on imports from Canada, which passed out of the Senate on a 51-48 vote. The bill has not moved in the House, effectively being rendered dead.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: King Charles III has announced that his younger brother, Prince Andrew, is to be formally stripped of his titles and honors, and evicted from the Royal Lodge. Andrew, who will now be known as Mr. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, had previously said he would no longer use his titles.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: King Charles III, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, and Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement issued by Buckingham Palace on October 30, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease [on the Royal Lodge] and he will move to alternative private accommodation.” – Buckingham Palace.
🎯IMPACT: Andrew will no longer be referred to as a prince; his daughters retain their titles as granddaughters of the late Queen Elizabeth II.
IN FULL
Prince Andrew is to be formally stripped of his titles and honors by King Charles III, according to an announcement from Buckingham Palace issued on Thursday. The statement confirmed that he will now be referred to as Mr. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and evicted from the Royal Lodge.
“His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the Style, Titles and Honours of Prince Andrew,” the statement reads. “Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence. Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease and he will move to alternative private accommodation.”
The statement adds that “These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him,” referring to accusations that the late Virginia Giuffre, a sex trafficking victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, was coerced by the pair into sleeping with Andrew when she was 17.
“Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse,” the Palace added.
Andrew recently announced he would no longer use his titles, while stressing he had done nothing wrong, but the King is now moving to formalize the situation. Notably, the soon-to-be former prince has also been under fire in recent weeks for meeting with a Chinese spymaster on multiple occasions.
While Andrew has been stripped of his titles, his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, are to retain their royal statuses as granddaughters of Queen Elizabeth. A source noted that King Charles III is keen to protect them, saying, “He wouldn’t have wanted to sign off on anything that would impact them.”
The King is understood to have made it clear that further actions would be taken against Andrew if he attempted to resist the process of downgrading his position, citing his “intolerable” behavior and lack of contrition.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) declared a state of emergency as millions of residents face the loss of food assistance due to the ongoing federal shutdown.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor Kathy Hochul, Republicans and Democrats in Congress, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), and other state leaders, including Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA).
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Thursday, with the shutdown now in its 30th day, impacting New York and other states across the U.S.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I am doing everything in my power to soften the blow of the destruction Republicans in Washington are inflicting on our state,” said Governor Hochul, despite the fact that it is the Senate Democrats who are blocking funding.
🎯IMPACT: Around three million New Yorkers could lose benefits worth $650 million a month.
IN FULL
New York’s Governor Kathy Hochul (D) has declared a state of emergency as millions of residents face losing food assistance on November 1 due to the ongoing Democrat-caused federal government shutdown. The governor is trying to blame Republicans in Congress for the funding lapse, saying Democrats have been pushing for clean resolutions to restore funding, despite the fact that Democrats have repeatedly blocked GOP spending legislation.
Hochul announced $65 million in emergency state funds to help food programs across New York. “The Trump Administration is cutting food assistance off for three million New Yorkers, leaving our state to face an unprecedented public health crisis and hurting our grocers, bodegas, and farmers along the way,” she alleged.
The federal shutdown, now in its 30th day, has disrupted the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which provides food benefits to 42 million Americans. The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed that contingency funds used to maintain SNAP during previous shutdowns have been exhausted, marking the first time the program has faced a complete lapse in funding. In New York alone, about three million residents risk losing $650 million in monthly benefits.
The Trump administration stated that it could not reallocate other federal funds to cover the November payments, citing legal restrictions. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) defended the decision, saying, “If they transferred funds from other sources, it would pull it away immediately from school meals and infant formula. It’s a tradeoff.”
Other governors have also stepped in as the shutdown continues. California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) deployed the National Guard to assist food banks, while Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) announced plans to declare a state of emergency. Hochul’s office stated that New York’s emergency aid is a temporary measure intended to prevent hunger while negotiations continue in Washington.
The crisis follows weeks of partisan deadlock. Earlier this month, House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark boasted that the hardships faced by Americans could be used as leverage against the GOP in the standoff. “Of course, there will be families that are going to suffer,” she said. “But it is one of the few leverage times we have.”
At the same time, President Donald J. Trump has touted a reduction in SNAP dependency since his administration began, saying that more than 600,000 Americans have left the program. Data cited by his team show that from January to May 2025, SNAP participation fell from 42.38 million to 41.73 million, a decline of roughly 645,000 recipients.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Dutch populist Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom (PVV) appear to be tied at 26 seats with the liberal-progressive D66 party following national elections in the Netherlands.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Geert Wilders’s Party for Freedom and Rob Jetten’s D66 party.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The election took place on Wednesday in the Netherlands.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The difference between the two leading parties was just over 2,000 votes nationwide,” according to Dutch national news agency ANP.
🎯IMPACT: The unprecedented tie is expected to delay the formation of a new coalition government.
IN FULL
The Dutch populist Party for Freedom (PVV), led by Geert Wilders, and the liberal-progressive Democrats 66 (D66), led by Rob Jetten, both appear to have secured 26 seats in the Dutch legislature with 98 percent of votes counted, according to figures published by the Dutch national news agency ANP. The difference between the two parties was reported to be just over 2,000 votes nationwide, marking the first time in Dutch history that a national election has concluded in such a tie.
The results show Wilders’s PVV losing 11 seats in the 150-member House of Representatives, while D66 gained 11. This razor-thin outcome is expected to prolong and complicate coalition negotiations, a process already notorious for taking months in the Netherlands’ fragmented political landscape.
Wilders reacted to the results, saying, “At the top with 26 seats just like D66. Nobody beats the PVV. Absolutely nobody! The entire campaign attacked by other parties and ‘journalists’, but they won’t bring us down, we stand tall and proud at the top and no other party has more than our 26 seats!!”
The vote follows years of turbulence in Dutch politics. In 2023, the government of long-serving liberal Prime Minister Mark Rutte collapsed after his four-party coalition failed to agree on asylum policies, particularly family reunification rules. Migration has remained one of the country’s most divisive issues, fueling the rise of populists like Wilders, who has long advocated for tighter border controls and a tougher stance on immigration and Islamization.
Economic and social tensions surrounding immigration have also intensified. A major study found that mass migration cost the Netherlands nearly half a trillion dollars between 1995 and 2019. These findings have intensified public debate over the long-term sustainability of migration policies and the pressure they place on housing, healthcare, and social welfare systems.
As the vote count nears completion, the tie between PVV and D66 has thrown the process of government formation into uncertainty. Building a majority coalition will require negotiations among multiple parties with sharply differing priorities. Analysts warn that forming a stable government could take months, or potentially trigger another round of elections if talks fail.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The federal government in Germany has revealed that over 135,000 crimes were committed by Syrian suspects between 2015 and 2024, averaging one every 39 minutes.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Alternative for Germany (AfD) co-leader Alice Weidel, AfD Bundestag (federal parliament) member Christopher Drößler, and other political figures.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Germany, between 2015 and 2024, with data released in response to a parliamentary inquiry.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This development is not only extremely alarming but also the result of government mismanagement and uncorrected political misjudgments.” – Alice Weidel
🎯IMPACT: The figures have reignited calls for stricter migration controls, large-scale deportations, and increased border security in Germany.
IN FULL
Newly released government statistics have ignited fierce debate over immigration policy in Germany, revealing that suspects of Syrian origin were linked to 135,668 crimes between 2015 and 2024, one every 39 minutes on average. The figures were disclosed by the Federal Ministry of the Interior in response to a parliamentary query from the populist, anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. The data has prompted renewed demands for stricter border controls and mass deportations, as critics decry migrants’ toll on public safety.
The report also tallies significant offenses tied to other nationalities: 82,960 from Afghanistan, 69,946 from Iraq, 39,918 from Morocco, and 32,383 from Algeria. In total, suspects from the top 10 countries of origin accounted for more than 460,000 violations over the decade.
AfD co-leader Alice Weidel seized on the numbers to blast the coalition government. “More than half of all women in Germany no longer feel safe in public spaces. This alarming figure is further proof of the government’s failure. Between 2015 and 2024, 135,668 Germans were victims of crimes committed by suspected Syrian perpetrators. This development is not only extremely alarming but also the result of government mismanagement and uncorrected political misjudgments,” she said.
Christopher Drößler, the AfD Bundestag (federal parliament) member who initiated the inquiry, echoed the sentiment and pushed for aggressive action. “Numbers don’t lie. The statistics confirm once again: Germans are primarily victims of criminal foreigners from [Middle] Eastern countries,” he said. Drößler advocated for enabling deportations to Syria, Afghanistan, Morocco, and Iraq, stressing the AfD as the only party with “clear solutions” like fortified borders, swift deportations of criminal migrants, and more police resources.
The controversy unfolds against a backdrop of explosive growth in Germany’s Syrian community. By late 2023, their numbers had ballooned to at least 972,000, a 16-fold increase from 60,000 in 2014. Overall, around one in 20 Syrians now live in Germany. Of these, over half, or more than 513,000, depend on welfare benefits such as Bürgergeld, with migrants comprising nearly half of all recipients. Foreigner-related expenditures reached €50 billion in 2023 alone, part of a €145 billion total since 2010. Studies show elevated violent crime rates among groups like Syrians and Afghans compared to native Germans.
High-profile offenses have heightened fears about migrant crime. On October 28, 2025, for instance, four Syrian teenagers and a 22-year-old Iraqi woman were arrested in Hamburg for allegedly throwing a 15-year-old Iraqi boy to his death from an eighth-floor apartment. Earlier in October, prosecutors in Heinsberg charged five Syrian men, adults and juveniles, with gang-raping a 17-year-old girl. These cases underscore the raw nerves exposed by the data, as the AfD leverages them to challenge the status quo on migration and security.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
