GET THE APP
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
zelensky

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

August 24, 2024
Election 2024
War

Biden-Harris Send ANOTHER $125 MILLION to Ukraine.

The Biden-Harris government will send approximately $125 million in new military assistance to Ukraine, according to U.S. officials. This move comes as Washington seeks a clearer understanding of Kiev’s recent escalation of the conflict with operations now being conducted within Russian territory.

The latest military aid package includes air defense missiles, munitions for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), Javelins, a variety of other anti-armor missiles, counter-drone and counter-electronic warfare systems, 155mm and 105mm artillery ammunition, vehicles, and assorted equipment. Biden and Kamala Harris are providing the equipment through presidential drawdown authority. The aid is being supplied amid ongoing Ukrainian efforts to extend their surprising offensive into Russia.

U.S. taxpayers—through the actions of the Biden-Harris government– have likely spent over $200 billion on aid to Ukraine since Russia invaded the Eastern European country in late February 2022. Former President Donald J. Trump has promised to end the conflict swiftly should he retake the White House in November’s U.S. presidential election.

It is believed that the Democratic Party’s nominee, Kamala Harris, will continue Biden’s policies toward Ukraine, providing billions of dollars more in aid. However, Harris has not released detailed policy proposals for top-election issues, including Ukraine aid.

Ukrainian forces have reportedly secured approximately 100 square kilometers (62 square miles) of territory around Kursk. Concurrently, Russian troops are making advances in eastern Ukraine near Pokrovsk, a crucial logistic center. Should Pokrovsk fall, Ukraine‘s defenses would be significantly compromised, moving Russia closer to its goal of capturing the Donetsk region. Reports indicate Russian forces are now about 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) from the city.

The Biden-Harris government says it recognizes Ukraine‘s intention to create a border buffer zone, but further clarity is needed on how this fits into the overall war strategy.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

38 minutes ago
News

‘OK, BOOMER’ – Trump Would Have +4 Approval Rating Without the Over 70s — Why?

PULSE POINTS:

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Removing voters aged 70 and older from the latest RealClear survey shifts Trump’s net approval from 0 to +3.7.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The 70+ group—consisting of early Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation—registered the only net disapproval of Trump at -14.

🧾KEY QUOTES: The poll shows 40% approval and 54% disapproval among voters 70 and older.

⚠️FALLOUT: This age bracket remains the primary consumer base for corporate media and is economically tied to government systems.

📌SIGNIFICANCE: Trump’s approval deficit is confined to a generation with both informational and financial incentives to reject systemic change.

 

IN FULL:

In the latest RealClear Opinion Research poll, Donald Trump’s approval rating stands at 44 percent approve and 44 percent disapprove. Removing the 70+ age group raises his approval rating to 44.9 percent and drops disapproval to 41.1 percent, producing a net improvement of nearly four points.

Voters aged 70 and older are the only cohort with a clear majority disapproving of Trump. All other age groups show either a tie or net approval. The data isolates the over-70 bloc as the key driver of Trump’s neutral national rating.

WHY?

This demographic is disproportionately reliant on legacy broadcast and print media for their news–a part of an outdated “outrage cycle” that has perpetuated falsehoods about President Trump for over a decade now.

Television networks and print outlets remain the Baby Boomer generation’s dominant sources of information, exposing them to consistently negative portrayals of Trump, his cabinet, and his policies. This generation also consistently elected politicians such as Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Hussein Obama. They backed the Iraq War, were largely culpable in the 2008 financial crisis, and were the first to panic in the early days of COVID, per public polling on the subjects.

In recent years, the “Ok, boomer” meme has sought to reflect how this particular generation finds itself uniquely at odds, politically as well as culturally, with the generations that came after it.

Consumption patterns among younger voters have shifted to direct, digital, and independent channels.

The 70+ demographic also represents the segment of the electorate most dependent on the preservation of entitlement programs. Years of payroll contributions to Social Security and Medicare have created a financial reliance on institutional continuity. Trump’s public posture toward reforming or dismantling government structures runs counter to the interests of voters who now depend on those systems for income and healthcare.

Trump’s support remains strong among voters aged 30 to 69. The polling indicates that opposition from the 70+ generation stems less from ideological divergence and more from structural dependency and media environment.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
War

Vance Sets Firm Deadline for Russia, Ukraine Peace Talks.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Vice President J.D. Vance revealed that the U.S. presented Russia and Ukraine with a proposal to end a conflict that has lasted over three years. The proposal stressed that without acceptance, the U.S. might disengage.

👥 Who’s Involved: Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, President Donald J. Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and Gen. Keith Kellogg.

📍 Where & When: The comments were made in India.

💬 Key Quote: Vance stated, “We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say yes or for the U.S. to walk away from this process.”

⚠️ Impact: Secretary Rubio discussed a potential withdrawal from negotiations, echoing President Trump’s sentiment on procuring peace.

IN FULL:

The U.S. has put forth a proposal urging an end to the prolonged conflict between Russia and Ukraine, according to Vice President J.D. Vance. During a press briefing in India, he emphasized that the proposal is a pivotal moment: if received unfavorably, the United States might scale back involvement.

“We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say yes or for the U.S. to walk away from this process,” Vance said. “We’ve engaged in an extraordinary amount of diplomacy, of on-the-ground work.”

Amid these diplomatic efforts, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaled a shift by not attending talks in London, England, ostensibly aimed at negotiating a ceasefire, citing logistical challenges. Instead, Gen. Keith Kellogg, the special presidential envoy for Ukraine, will represent U.S. interests in the British capital.

The conversation surrounding possible cessation efforts underscores President Donald J. Trump’s determination to secure peace. The President has aligned with Rubio, supporting the prospect of a short-term withdrawal from talks if progress remains stagnant. “Think about it, every day a lot of people are being killed as we talk about, you know, as they play games, so we’re not gonna take that,” he warned.

Mutual accusations of ceasefire violations, particularly following an Easter truce, between Ukraine and Russia underscore both parties’ seeming reluctance to ramp down the conflict.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Jack Montgomery
News

Elon Musk Says He’ll Back Away From DOGE ‘In The Next Month.’

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Elon Musk pledged to reduce his time working for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Tesla’s net income plummeted 71 percent to $409 million, its least profitable quarter since 2020.

👥 Who’s Involved: Elon Musk, Tesla CEO and Trump advisor; Donald J. Trump, 45th and 47th U.S. President.

📍 Where & When: Musk spoke on an earnings call on April 22, 2025, following Tesla’s Q1 results.

💬 Key Quote: “Probably in the next month, my time allocation to DOGE will drop significantly.” — Elon Musk.

⚠️ Impact: Musk’s shift in focus may stabilize Tesla amid boycotts and tariff-related losses, but his MAGA ties risk long-term damage to the brand’s appeal among liberal consumers.

IN FULL:

Tesla owner Elon Musk has announced plans to significantly cut back on his role in President Donald J. Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after the electric car company reported a 71 percent drop in net income to $409 million for the first quarter of 2025—the least profitable quarter since 2020. Sales fell nine percent to $19.3 billion, missing market expectations, as Tesla grapples with boycotts from left-leaning consumers and the impact of President Trump’s trade tariffs on its supply chain. “Probably in the next month, my time allocation to DOGE will drop significantly,” Musk said on an earnings call Tuesday evening, signaling a pivot back to Tesla’s core business.

Musk’s involvement in the Trump administration has alienated liberal electric vehicle (EV) buyers. Tesla believes “Changing political sentiment” and a 13 percent drop in vehicle deliveries in Q1 reflect a boycott by Democrat-voting Americans and European markets. Tesla’s stock, down 40 percent from its December peak despite a five percent post-earnings rally, reflects investor unease.

Musk’s alignment with the administration has also sparked aggressive attacks on Tesla vehicles and showrooms and even customers, with every Tesla owner being doxxed by hackers in March.

Meanwhile, Tesla faces fierce competition, having been overtaken by China’s BYD as the top electric vehicle producer in 2024.

Musk is betting on futuristic ventures to revive Tesla, including a self-driving taxi service set to launch in Austin, Texas, by June and production of the Optimus humanoid robot later this year. However, skeptics like Gordon Johnson of GJH Research doubt these ventures will yield profits for five to ten years, if ever. “Even the ‘Tesla faithful’ are beginning to lose patience,” Johnson warned.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

17 hours ago
Crime
Immigration

Feds Use Anti-Mob Law to Target Migrant Gang for First Time.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Federal authorities charged 27 individuals associated with the Tren de Aragua gang and splinter group Anti-Tren with racketeering. They are accused of engaging in criminal activities such as murder plots, extortion, and sex trafficking in New York City.

👥 Who’s Involved: The indictment includes alleged members Jarwin Valero-Calderon, Samuel Gonzalez Castro, Eferson Morillo-Gomez, and Anderson Smith Zambrano-Pacheco, among others.

📍 Where & When: The indictments were announced in Manhattan federal court on Monday. The criminal acts reportedly took place in areas such as the Bronx and Prospect Avenue, with incidents dating back several months.

💬 Key Quote: Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch referred to Tren de Aragua as “one of the most dangerous gangs in the country” and praised the law enforcement efforts to dismantle their operations in New York City.

⚠️ Impact: Those charged face potential life sentences under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, previously utilized to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the Mafia.

IN FULL:

Federal authorities have filed racketeering charges against 27 suspected members of a gang network linked to Tren de Aragua and rival splinter group Anti-Tren. These charges represent the first instance of the U.S. government employing the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act—a tool used in past organized crime cases such as those against Mafia families—to target the group, with the Trump administration pushing a much more robust line against migrant crime than the former Biden-Harris government.

The indictment involves allegations of murder plots, extortion, and the sex trafficking of young women in the New York City area. The alleged criminal activities reportedly occurred over several months in locations such as the Bronx, including a notable incident at a Prospect Avenue apartment. According to court documents, members like Jarwin Valero-Calderon and Anderson Smith Zambrano-Pacheco were involved in threats and acts of violence to maintain control over these areas.

The indictment details a specific event where suspects Samuel Gonzalez Castro and Eferson Morillo-Gomez allegedly threatened attendees of a party near the Bronx apartment with violence, underscoring the level of intimidation exercised by the gang.

Authorities also claim that young women trafficked into the United States by these gangs were subjected to serious harm or threats should they attempt to escape. This element of the case highlights grave concerns regarding human trafficking related to the group’s activities.

The charges carry potentially severe penalties. If convicted, the accused face sentences of up to life imprisonment.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

18 hours ago
Education
Lawfare

Harvard Launches Lawfare Suit Against Trump Over $2.2 Billion Funding Freeze.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Harvard University has initiated legal action against the Trump administration after a $2.2 billion grant freeze following the university’s refusal to adhere to certain conditions set by the White House.

👥 Who’s Involved: Participants include Harvard University, represented by its president, Alan M. Garber, and the Trump administration.

📍 Where & When: Cambridge, Massachusetts, with developments since last week’s White House announcement.

💬 Key Quote: “The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” said Alan M. Garber, Harvard’s president.

⚠️ Impact: The freeze could significantly affect research, according to Harvard.

IN FULL:

Harvard University has filed a lawsuit in response to the Trump administration’s decision to suspend $2.2 billion in grants following the university’s rejection of White House demands. The Ivy League institution in Cambridge, Massachusetts, accuses the administration of overreaching, challenging its independence, and attempting to influence academic decisions by requiring it to screen foreign students for extremist views.

The conflict arose after Harvard opted not to implement measures required by the administration, which included vetting foreign students for anti-Semitism and hostility toward American values, and shutting down diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. These conditions were closely linked to allegations of ideological bias and the university’s purported failure to safeguard Jewish students on campus. In response, President Alan M. Garber argued that the demands interfere with academic freedom and decision-making.

The situation escalated when the White House announced the freeze, suggesting that Harvard was not meeting the necessary conditions for receiving taxpayer money. “Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege,” remarked Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman.

Garber claims that the funding halt could jeopardize research initiatives, including studies on serious diseases like pediatric cancer, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. He argued in court documents that the administration has not established any meaningful link between anti-Semitism concerns and the research projects put on hold—failing to take responsibility for the funding freeze by refusing the administration’s conditions.

The lawsuit comes amid a broader review by the administration into universities’ handling of anti-Semitism and other forms of extremism, with at least 60 institutions under scrutiny.

Image by Adam Fagen.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

19 hours ago
Health

RFK Jr. Pushes Forward With Bans on Synthetic Dyes in Food Supply.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to announce a plan to eliminate petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the U.S. food supply.

👥 Who’s Involved: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.

📍 Where & When: The announcement will be made on Tuesday, as stated in an HHS press release.

💬 Key Quote: “Kennedy said he wants eight commonly used food dyes phased out by the end of 2026.”

⚠️ Impact: The plan, if implemented, would remove several synthetic dyes from a wide range of food products, impacting manufacturers and possibly altering product formulations.

IN FULL:

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is poised to unveil a new initiative to remove petroleum-based synthetic dyes from food products across the United States. The announcement is scheduled for Tuesday, accompanied by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.

This action seeks to phase out eight synthetic dyes frequently utilized in popular items such as sodas, candies, and cereals. Notably, the FDA approved 36 such dyes, including Red No. 3, Blue No. 1, and Green No. 3. These ingredients are widespread in the food industry due to their vibrant colors.

The proposal aligns with ongoing scrutiny of food dyes. Some studies previously associated Red Dye No. 3 with various health concerns. The dye was finally banned ahead of RFK Jr.’s confirmation hearings.

States like Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, and West Virginia have already taken steps to eliminate such dyes from school cafeterias, showcasing a trend towards limiting artificial coloring in foods that children frequently consume.

According to reports, Kennedy’s strategy intends to phase out eight of these synthetic dyes by the end of 2026. Such a move could prompt significant changes in food manufacturing processes, requiring companies to reformulate products with natural colorings.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

19 hours ago
News
TECH

Trump DOJ Urges Court to Order Google to Sell Chrome in Antitrust Push.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: The Justice Department has called on a federal judge to require Google to surrender control over its Chrome web browser due to antitrust concerns.

👥 Who’s Involved: Key figures include Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater, Justice Department official David Dahlquist, and U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta.

📍 Where & When: The remarks were made in court on Monday; the proceedings occurred in the United States.

💬 Key Quote: “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.” — Deputy Attorney General Blanche.

⚠️ Impact: Potentially significant changes in control of Google’s Chrome web browser and broader implications for competition within the global search market.

IN FULL:

In a significant development in antitrust proceedings against Google, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) urged a district judge on Monday to compel Google to divest ownership of the Chrome web browser. The call comes as part of ongoing efforts to address Google’s dominant role in the global search market. Some allege the dominance is maintained through illegal agreements that hinder competition and negatively affect consumers and advertisers.

In court, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche cited Google’s monopolistic practices, emphasizing the company’s extensive influence over online data and alleged political bias through its search engine operations. Deputy Attorney General Blanche told U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.”

He argued that Google’s control stems largely from its nearly $20 billion annual payment to Apple, securing Google’s search engine as the default on Apple’s Safari browser. This payment was highlighted during a trial last year focusing on liability.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has previously recognized Google’s monopolistic behaviors. Mehta is now tasked with assessing the remedy phase of this case. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater highlighted the bipartisan nature of the case. Slater noted the involvement of 49 states alongside federal authorities in challenging Google’s competitive practices.

DOJ official David Dahlquist referred to the current situation as a pivotal moment for restoring market competition. The Trump DOJ’s stance reflects a continued commitment to ensuring monopolistic behaviors do not compromise competition in the digital market.

Image by Anthony Quintano.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 hours ago
NatSec

A Biden Holdover & Democrat Donor is Amassing Power in Trump’s Department of Defense, Causing Major Concerns.

PULSE POINTS:

❓ What Happened: Col. Ricky Buria, a former aide to Biden-era Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, has resigned from the Marine Corps and is reportedly transitioning into a senior civilian role under Trump-world Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, with consideration for the coveted chief of staff position. Buria, a recent Democrat donor, is the source of major concerns in Trump world.

👤 Who Was Involved: Ricky Buria, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, outgoing Chief of Staff Joe Kasper, former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Democratic congressional candidate Mike O’Brien, and former DoD official Anne Powers.

🧾 Key Quote: “Ricky was only the [Senior Military Assistant] because he was the only guy standing,” a defense official told Defense News.

⚠️ Fallout: Officials inside the Department of Defense and the White House have raised concerns about Buria’s close ties to the previous administration.

📌 Significance: The personnel move highlights unresolved tensions surrounding staffing and loyalty inside the Pentagon’s top ranks.

IN FULL:

Col. Ricky Buria, a former junior military assistant (JMA) to Lloyd Austin, is reportedly in line for a senior civilian advisory position under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to multiple defense officials. Buria began terminal leave from the Marine Corps last week and is even under consideration for the role of chief of staff following the departure of Joe Kasper, according to numerous sources familiar with the matter.

But Buria was first appointed to the Pentagon in April 2024 under the Biden government. After Hegseth’s confirmation, Buria remained in place–a “holdover”–while other senior staff were dismissed. He temporarily filled the position of acting senior military assistant (SMA).

“Ricky was only the SMA because he was the only guy standing,” an official told Defense News.

In recent months, Buria has accompanied Hegseth on official travel and participated in high-level meetings. On a recent trip to Panama, Buria was present for discussions with the Panamanian government regarding canal access. He also joined a bilateral meeting in Washington with El Salvador’s Minister of Defense, seated two chairs away from the secretary.

Buria, far left, with Hegseth in Panama.

Multiple officials say Buria has taken on expanded responsibilities beyond those typical of a junior military assistant, including personnel input and attendance at foreign policy briefings.

Additionally, campaign finance data uncovered by The National Pulse shows that Buria made a donation in 2023 via ActBlue to Democrat Mike O’Brien, a former Marine and candidate in Pennsylvania’s 10th Congressional District. O’Brien was endorsed by VoteVets–a left-wing group that claims President Trump “hates veterans,” and has attempted to destabilize his Department of Defense using the now-infamous “Signal group chat” story as a cudgel. The group even publicly called for Hegseth to be fired.

Buria has maintained relationships with former Biden-era Pentagon staffers. In a LinkedIn comment, former Department of Defense official Anne Powers publicly referred to Buria as her “partner in crime,” while he heaped praise on others and vice versa.

Buria’s messages to Biden-era staffers on LinkedIn.

The White House personnel office is reviewing Buria’s transition to civilian service. Approval is required for senior advisory appointments.

Buria was promoted to colonel in fall 2024. Under standard requirements, officers must serve two years at a given rank to retire at that grade. Without a waiver, he is expected to retire as a lieutenant colonel.

Four top officials have departed Hegseth’s team in recent days. The staffing turnover has left a gap in senior leadership, which Buria is currently helping fill, much to the chagrin of many across the Trump administration.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

21 hours ago
Jack Montgomery
UK

Chef Marco Pierre White Praises ‘Really Impressive’ Farage, Endorses Reform’s Arron Banks.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Celebrity chef Marco Pierre White praised Nigel Farage and endorsed the Reform Party’s candidate for West of England Mayor, Arron Banks, ahead of May’s municipal elections.

👥 Who’s Involved: Marco Pierre White, celebrity chef; Nigel Farage, Reform Party leader; Sir Keir Starmer, British Prime Minister; Arron Banks, Reform’s West of England mayoral candidate.

📍 Where & When: White spoke to ITV West Country at Old Down Manor near Bristol, England, owned by Arron Banks.

💬 Key Quote: “I thought [Farage] was a very impressive individual, really impressive.” — Marco Pierre White.

⚠️ Impact: White’s high-profile endorsement could boost Reform’s momentum as polls show growing support, while his criticism of Labour’s ethics and policies may further erode public trust in Starmer’s government.

IN FULL:

Celebrity chef and restaurateur Marco Pierre White has thrown his weight behind Nigel Farage and his Reform Party, delivering a blistering critique of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party. Speaking at Old Down Manor near Bristol—owned by Reform’s West of England mayoral candidate Arron Banks, a businessman and the driving force behind the Leave.EU campaign during the Brexit referendum—White praised Farage as a “really impressive, clever, [and] thoughtful.”

White, who met Farage recently, said he thought the Brexiteer “was a very impressive individual, really impressive.”

“He has done his apprenticeship, hasn’t he? He has served his time in the field,” he remarked, referring to Farage’s decades of campaigning in the European Parliament, media, and now the House of Commons since 1999. “I can see why the polls are showing what they’re showing,” he added, referring to surveys showing Reform tying and often beating Labour and the formerly governing Conservatives by increasingly convincing margins.

Describing himself as a “true socialist” but disillusioned with establishment parties, White had sharp words for Starmer, caught in a “freebie” scandal shortly after he gained the British premiership. “As Prime Minister of the UK, the last thing you should be doing is accepting freebies, or any of your party,” White said.

The chef was referring a scandal involving Lord Alli, a Labour donor elevated to the House of Lords under former Prime Minister Tony Blair, gifting £20,000 in work clothes and over £2,000 in eyeglasses to Starmer, with thousands more being lavished on clothes for Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and the Labour leader’s wife, Victoria.

White also sounded the alarm on Labour’s economic policies. “My world is the restaurant world, the hotel world, hospitality,” he said. “It’s tough. Restaurants are going bust every week; hotels are struggling. If you look at the pubs, they’re closing down.”

White blamed rising costs—minimum wage increases, higher National Insurance, utilities, and food prices—for “crippling” the sector.

WATCH:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by ITV Politics (@itvpolitics)

Image by Owain.davies.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

22 hours ago
Jack Montgomery
News

Bannon Blasts DOJ Inaction: ‘The Deep State Is Winning Right Now.’

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: WarRoom host Stephen K. Bannon criticized the Trump Department of Justice, claiming the “Deep State is winning.”

👥 Who’s Involved: Stephen K. Bannon, Jack Posobiec, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

📍 Where & When: WarRoom podcast, Monday.

💬 Key Quote: “We’re not doing anything over at Justice Department. I don’t see investigations, I don’t see indictments,” said Bannon.

⚠️ Impact: Bannon’s comments reflect dissatisfaction among some Trump supporters and a call for more action from the DOJ.

IN FULL:

WarRoom host Stephen K. Bannon has voiced his dissatisfaction with the Department of Justice (DOJ), warning that the Deep State currently holds the upper hand in government. During a conversation with Jack Posobiec on Monday, Bannon emphasized the lack of visible progress in the DOJ’s investigations and indictments: “We’re not doing anything over at Justice Department. I don’t see investigations, I don’t see indictments,” he said, expressing concern that the Pam Bondi-led department is about to be diverted into investigating leaks around America First Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“If the guys around Hegseth, if there’s indictments or investigations going on, and there’s no indictments, and there’s no release of the Epstein Files, and there’s no investigations of Brennan and the 51, and you’re not spending your time on that, but somehow gets diverted over this, it is going to be a firestorm from the MAGA base,” Bannon said, referring to anti-Trump former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan and the 51 intelligence officials who penned a letter downplaying the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation ahead of the 2020 election.

“There has been no movement from the Justice Department,” Bannon stated. “[N]ow they’re talking about… some investigation of the guys around Hegseth… you haven’t done your primary job, which is to take down the Deep State.”

“People, we are burning daylight!” he stressed. “These people are playing smashmouth, they’re playing hardball, and the Deep State is winning right now!”

WATCH:

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad