Tuesday, October 21, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Israel Set to Launch ‘Limited’ Ground Invasion of Lebanon.

Israel has informed officials in the Biden-Harris government that it will soon launch a limited ground invasion of southern Lebanon. The move comes on the heels of Israeli military strikes over the last several weeks, which have seemingly eliminated nearly the entire senior leadership of the Lebanon-based terrorist group Hezbollah. On Friday, the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, was killed in a massive airstrike on the terror group’s command bunker just south of the Lebanese capital of Beirut.

According to U.S. officials, the Israelis say the invasion will be much smaller in scale than the 2006 ground war in Lebanon, which saw around 120 Israeli soldiers killed and another 1,200 wounded. Israel estimates the 2006 war resulted in the deaths of 600 Hezbollah fighters, with upwards of 800 wounded. Nearly 1,200 Lebanese civilians were also killed in the war, according to international humanitarian groups. Additionally, Israeli officials have told the U.S. that the latest incursion into Lebanon will be far shorter in duration than the 2006 conflict.

Following the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel, the Jewish state has been engaged in a multi-front conflict with Hamas in Gaza to its south and with Hezbollah in Lebanon to its north. Both terror groups are considered to be military proxies of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Until now, the conflict has predominately remained isolated to Israel’s southern and northern borders; however, a ground incursion into Lebanon—especially following the decapitation strikes against Hezbollah’s leadership—could provoke a more aggressive response from Iran.

Earlier this month, Israel allegedly used small explosives hidden in pager devices and walkie-talkies to injure or kill hundreds of Hezbollah terrorists.

Image by Israel Defense Forces. 

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Democrat Congresswoman Seeks Dismissal of Charges for Assaulting ICE Agents.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) is seeking to have assault charges against her dismissed in court.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. LaMonica McIver, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged assault occurred in May 2025, outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, with a trial set for November 2025.

🎯IMPACT: McIver faces up to 17 years in prison if convicted, with a trial scheduled for next month.

IN FULL

Representative LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) is expected to file a motion in federal court today asking that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecution against her be dismissed. The New Jersey Democrat was charged with assault in June for forcibly impeding federal officers during the attempted arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D).

In May, McIver and Baraka clashed with federal agents while demanding to enter the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark. Baraka was arrested for trespassing after he entered a secured area of the facility and refused to leave when asked by federal agents.

McIver is accused of three counts of assaulting or impeding federal agents for her actions during the May incident, with her trial set to begin next month. If convicted, she could face up to 17 years in prison.

The new motion will likely echo prior filings by McIver’s attorneys, contending that the case should be thrown out on grounds of selective and vindictive prosecution by the Trump administration. Notably, her attorneys have already filed a separate motion to dismiss on the grounds of  “legislative immunity.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Colombia’s Marxist Leader Says He Wants to ‘Get Rid Of’ Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro suggested “getting rid of” President Donald J. Trump in an interview on Monday evening.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Colombian President Gustavo Petro and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 20, 2025, during an interview with Univision.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If not—get rid of Trump,” Petro said, snapping his fingers.

🎯IMPACT: The remarks mark a significant escalation in the Marxist leader’s feud with Trump over his use of military airstrikes to stop cartel drug smuggling operations in the Caribbean.

IN FULL

Colombian President Gustavo Petro is escalating his feud with U.S. President Donald. J. Trump, suggesting in an interview on Monday night with the Spanish-language network Univision that “getting rid of” Trump may be necessary. “Humanity has a first offramp, it is to choose to change Trump in various ways,” Petro said, adding: “The easiest way may be through Trump himself. If not—get rid of Trump,” snapping his fingers for emphasis.

While the Marxist Colombian leader acknowledged his country has struggled to rein in violent drug cartels and end government corruption, Petro insisted only Colombians can determine their country’s future, stating: “Trump said: ‘Colombia is out of control.’ Of course, it is out of his control. In a democracy, a government is under the control of the people, not Trump. He is not a king in Colombia; we do not accept kings here, period.”

“In the 21st century, some believe they can become kings and viceroys, but in republics, it is not possible,” Petro continued, before threatening: “Here, the heads of kings are cut off if they come with a king’s attitude.”


The National Pulse reported on Monday that Trump doubled down on his criticism of Colombia, calling Petro a “lunatic” and the “worst president they’ve ever had.” The America First leader has vowed to halt all payments to the Latin American country over its cocaine production and renewed support of neighboring Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

Since September, the U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes targeting Venezuelan drug boats in the Caribbean as part of a larger effort to eliminate criminal drug cartels across Latin America. In early October, President Trump formally notified Congress that the United States is now engaged in an official “armed conflict” with the South and Central American cartels.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Thousands of Potential Noncitizens Found on Texas Voter Rolls.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Texas Secretary of State’s office identified 2,724 people on voter rolls who may not be U.S. citizens, following a cross-check with the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson and county election officials, utilizing data from the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) SAVE program.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Texas, with a press release issued on Monday, covering all 254 counties in the state.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.” – Jane Nelson

🎯IMPACT: County election officials will notify flagged voters, with a 30-day period to verify citizenship before potential removal from voter rolls.

IN FULL

The office of Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson has pinpointed 2,724 possible noncitizens listed on the state’s voter registration database, following a cross-check with the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system. This initiative, supported by the Trump administration’s broadened access to federal records, represents a key advancement in ensuring accurate voter rolls.

Secretary of State Jane Nelson remarked: “We appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.” The process involved scrutinizing 18 million voter records against SAVE’s citizenship information, highlighting cases for additional checks. These potential cases are distributed throughout Texas counties, with the highest concentrations in Harris (362), Dallas (277), Bexar (201), and El Paso (165).

Local county election authorities are now alerting those flagged and offering a 30-day period to confirm their citizenship. Voters who fail to submit evidence could see their registrations suspended temporarily, with the option for restoration once eligibility is validated. Federal election laws bar noncitizens from casting votes.

A Department of Homeland Security representative commented, “Illegal aliens have exploited outdated systems to defraud Americans and taint our elections. This revamped SAVE system will ensure government officials can swiftly verify legal status, halting entitlements and voter fraud.”

The examination encompassed all 254 Texas counties, assigning election officials the duty of in-depth probes to guarantee that only qualified voters stay listed. Secretary Nelson stressed, “Everyone’s right to vote is sacred and must be protected. The SAVE database has proven to be a critically important data set and one of many that we will continue to use in Texas to ensure that only qualified voters cast a ballot in our elections.”

Image by Lorie Shaull.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Socialized UK Health Service Determined Southport Killer Was Not Dangerous Days Before Stabbing Spree.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An official inquiry into the stabbing spree targeting young girls in Southport, England, by Axel Rudakubana has found that he was assessed as posing no risk to others in a mental health evaluation by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just six days before his attack.

WHO WAS INVOLVED: Axel Rudakubana, Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) case manager Kathryn Morris, clinical lead Dr. Vicky Killen, psychiatrists Dr. Lakshmi Ramasubramanian and Dr. Anthony Molyneux, counsel Nicholas Moss KC, and Rudakubana’s victims.

WHEN & WHERE: Risk assessment and discharge on July 23, 2024, at Alder Hey CAMHS; attack on July 29, 2024, in Southport; inquiry testimony on October 20, 2025, at Liverpool Town Hall.

KEY QUOTE: “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.” – Dr Anthony Molyneux.

IMPACT: Revelations expose critical lapses in mental health oversight and information sharing, fueling calls for systemic reforms in child services to prevent future tragedies amid Rudakubana’s history of violence and manipulation.

IN FULL

A public inquiry has revealed serious failings by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just days before Axel Rudakubana, carried out a deadly knife attack that killed three young girls and injured several others in Southport, England. The then-17-year-old was discharged by Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) on July 23, 2024, following a risk assessment that incorrectly concluded he posed no threat to others. This decision was made despite records noting incidents of aggression, including verbal threats toward his father—an African asylum seeker—and smashing a phone during a call.

Only six days later, on July 29, Rudakubana stormed a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop and fatally stabbed three girls: seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, six-year-old Bebe King, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar. He also attempted to kill ten other children and wounded two adults. The attack shocked the nation and led to widespread anti-mass migration demonstrations and riots, which prompted a draconian crackdown by the British authorities.

At Monday’s hearing at Liverpool Town Hall, Nicholas Moss KC confronted CAMHS clinical lead Dr Vicky Killen, who admitted the determination that Rudakubana was not dangerous was unacceptable. “There was risk on the record and it should have been recorded,” she said, conceding the assessment fell “very far” short of expected standards.

Other medical professionals also raised concerns about Rudakubana’s history. Psychiatrist Dr Lakshmi Ramasubramanian recounted a troubling phone consultation in 2021, where she said Rudakubana described symptoms “as if he had rehearsed it from a book” to obtain medication. She described his behaviour as “demanding, argumentative,” and said he tried to “manipulate” the situation. She eventually stopped treatment after his migrant father acted in an “intimidating” and “disrespectful” manner, something she said had never happened in her career.

Dr Anthony Molyneux, who began treating Rudakubana in July 2022, assessed him as a “minimal” risk. He knew of a school knife incident but was unaware of more serious events, including a 2019 assault on a pupil with a hockey stick and online searches for terrorism-related content. Molyneux said full record reviews were “impossible” saying, “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

London Mayor Khan Accused of Muslim Rape Gang Cover-Up.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A recent investigation by several British media outlets has uncovered allegations of a “cover-up” by London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan regarding Muslim grooming gangs, accusing him of overlooking evidence of organized sexual exploitation in the city.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mayor Khan, Conservative Party Assembly Member Susan Hall, Reform Party Member of Parliament (MP) Lee Anderson, Metropolitan Police Chief Sir Mark Rowley, and convicted predators Naeem Ahmed, Nabeel Ahmed, and Hassan Raza.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The allegations cover incidents in London from 2013 to 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is real, credible evidence that grooming gangs exist in London, and for the Mayor to have potentially turned a blind eye is utterly shameful” – Lee Anderson MP.

🎯IMPACT: The findings have heightened demands for a high-powered national inquiry into grooming gangs under Sir Keir Starmer’s Government, amplified by a victim’s resignation from a Home Office panel over claims of victims’ voices are being suppressed.

IN FULL

London’s Muslim Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, of the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, is facing growing scrutiny after multiple investigations revealed evidence of Muslim grooming gangs operating in the capital. Critics say have been downplayed or ignored for years in the capital—which is unusual in being a major urban center with a large Muslim population but no major rape gang revelations, as in cities such as Rotherham and Rochdale.

A joint investigation by several British media outlets uncovered serious cases of child sexual exploitation in London boroughs including Redbridge, Newham, and Stratford, with claims that officials failed to act on credible intelligence. Among the most serious incidents are the 2013 convictions of Naeem Ahmed, Nabeel Ahmed, and Hassan Raza in Redbridge. Prosecutors said the three men targeted a vulnerable woman, who was befriended and then raped and sexually assaulted by the group. A detective in the case said, “Nabeel Ahmed chose this woman because she was vulnerable. Having befriended her… he instead took her to his friends and they all sexually abused her.”

In 2017, four teenage girls aged between 13 and 15 reported being groomed near a McDonald’s in Stratford. They said they were moved between locations and sexually assaulted by multiple men. A subsequent investigation identified 30 potential victims and led to six arrests, but ultimately no charges were filed. At the time, police admitted the scale of the abuse “could be wider than initially thought.”

These cases have reignited accusations that authorities, including the Mayor’s office, have been reluctant to confront the issue publicly. Notably, Mayor Khan repeatedly claimed he did not understand what “grooming gangs” are under questioning at the London Assembly earlier this year.

Lee Anderson, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, commented, “There is real, credible evidence that grooming gangs exist in London, and for the Mayor to have potentially turned a blind eye is utterly shameful.”

London’s Metropolitan Police, under Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, previously stated there were no ongoing grooming gang investigations in the British capital, but recently reversed that position and claimed that cases are being pursued.

Calls are mounting for a national inquiry that includes the capital, amid growing public concern that grooming gang crimes have been systematically underreported across the country.

Image by East London Mosque.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Republicans Demand Investigation Into ‘No Kings’ Speaker Who Wants ICE Agents ‘Shot and Wiped Out.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A speaker at a “No Kings” rally in Chicago was recorded calling for the murder of federal immigration agents, sparking calls for investigation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The unnamed protester, City Colleges of Chicago staff, ICE agents, and Illinois Rep. Mary Miller.

📍WHEN & WHERE: At a “No Kings” rally in Chicago, Illinois. The video was shared widely on social media shortly after the event.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out.” – No Kings rally speaker

🎯IMPACT: The Department of Justice (DOJ) is pledging accountability for threats against law enforcement.

IN FULL

Republicans are demanding an investigation into a man filmed urging people to murder U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at a “No Kings” rally in Chicago, Illinois. In the footage, the speaker declares, “You gotta grab a gun, we gotta turn around the guns on this fascist system. These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out. The same machinery that’s on full display right there has to get wiped out.”

Illinois Republican Rep. Mary Miller condemned the statements on X, describing them as “sickening” and demanding an investigation into the unnamed speaker, said to be a member of staff at a Chicago college. “A staff member at Wilbur Wright College is calling for ICE agents to get ‘shot’ and ‘wiped out.’ This is a criminal threat that should be investigated,” she wrote, tagging the Department of Justice (DOJ).

A DOJ spokesman said, “The Department is actively tracking these targeted assaults against our law enforcement and will hold offenders accountable to the fullest extent of the law.”

The No Kings speech follows a pattern of increasing threats to ICE agents, including a sniper attack in Texas. The National Pulse reported earlier on Monday on an illegal immigrant being arrested for allegedly offering $10,000 bounties to kill ICE agents on TikTok.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Expanding Immigration Raids to San Francisco.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is expanding its crackdown on sanctuary cities, with San Francisco, California, a new target for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and California Governor Gavin Newsom (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on October 20, 2025, during a press conference in Sarasota, Florida.

💬KEY QUOTE: “San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago it went wrong, it went woke.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: San Francisco joins other cities like Portland, Oregon, and Chicago, Illinois, in facing federal operations aimed at removing illegal immigrant criminals.

IN FULL

The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on sanctuary cities, designating San Francisco, California, as a key target for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revealed the decision at a press conference in Sarasota, Florida, on Monday.

“We continue to have targeted operations in many, many cities, but also very focused on those where challenges are still remaining, such as Portland, Chicago, we’re in Memphis as well, we’re going to San Francisco at the direction of the president as well,” Noem declared.

President Donald J. Trump weighed in during an interview, stating, “San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago it went wrong, it went woke. We’re going to San Francisco and we’re going to make it great.”

Democrat California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has strenuously opposed Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration law in line with his 2024 election mandate, complained on X, “Nobody wants you here. You will ruin one of America’s greatest cities.”

San Francisco adopted its sanctuary status in 1989 through the “City and County of Refuge” Ordinance, which bars local police from assisting ICE in matters involving illegal immigrant criminals.

In Democrat-run cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles, federal officers have encountered fierce anti-ICE demonstrations and riots. Trump has tapped the National Guard and U.S. Marines in response to such disturbances before, but court challenges brought by Democrats such as Newsom and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker have at times delayed federal actions.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Notorious Antifa Site Announces Shutdown, Cites Fear of Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A major Antifa news site has annouced it will be shutting down due to pressure from the Trump administration, following the desgination of Antifa as a terrorist group.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The It’s Going Down (IGD) website, Antifa, the Trump administration, and journalist Andy Ngo.

📍WHEN & WHERE: It’s Going Down annouced the shutting down of the site on October 18.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Over the years, ‘It’s Going Down’ has posted numerous claims of responsibility for domestic terrorist attacks, including an attempt by an Antifa militant to derail a train, which led to the website being mentioned in a federal criminal complaint. The website has also posted manuals on carrying out crimes and evading detection for terrorist attacks.” – Andy Ngo.

🎯IMPACT: The closure comes after the Trump administration began to seriously investigate the leftist terror group.

IN FULL

A prominent far-left Antifa website known for promoting anarchist ideologies has shut down, citing increasing federal pressure under the Trump administration. The site, It’s Going Down (IGD), announced its closure in a public statement on October 18, claiming it could no longer operate in what it described as a “dire” political climate. “The current administration is attempting to consolidate extreme authoritarian power,” the site’s extremist operators claimed.

The move follows the Trump administration’s crackdown on domestic extremist groups, particularly those associated with Antifa, including President Donald J. Trump formally designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. The executive order, issued on September 22, characterized Antifa as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise” that seeks to overthrow the U.S. government and law enforcement institutions.

The administration followed up with National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, directing federal agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle left-wing extremist operations, including financial networks and affiliated nonprofit groups.

IGD, which has operated for years, gained notoriety for publishing content sympathetic to anarchist extremist groups and so-called direct action campaigns. It has previously been cited by federal authorities in connection with riots, vandalism, and sabotage. In a 2020 case, the Department of Justice (DOJ) referenced the site in a criminal complaint related to an attempt to derail a train in Washington state.

Andy Ngo, a journlaist who has covered Antifa extremists extensively,  commented on the closure saying, “Over the years, ‘It’s Going Down’ has posted numerous claims of responsibility for domestic terrorist attacks, including an attempt by an Antifa militant to derail a train, which led to the website being mentioned in a federal criminal complaint. The website has also posted manuals on carrying out crimes and evading detection for terrorist attacks.”

The Trump administration’s campaign against far-left extremism escalated in October when a federal grand jury indicted two alleged Antifa members for an armed attack on a federal immigration facility in Texas. The suspects were charged with terrorism-related offenses, including attempted murder of federal officers and providing material support for terrorism. The incident marked the first time alleged Antifa affiliates have been formally charged as domestic terrorists.

On October 16, the Treasury Department also instructed banks and financial institutions to begin monitoring transactions and donations linked to Antifa and other organizations flagged under the new domestic terrorism directive.

In a related development, Rutgers University professor Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, announced he would be leaving the United States. Bray, a known defender of Antifa tactics, said he could no longer safely continue his work in the current political climate.

Image by Oompje.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New Charges Filed Against Adult Suspects in Edward ‘Big Balls’ Coristine Assault.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Two suspects were charged with assaulting Ethan Levine before attacking former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward “Big Balls” Coristine on August 3.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lawrence Cotton Powell (19), Anthony Taylor (18), Edward Coristine, Ethan Levine, and other unidentified suspects.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incidents occurred on Swan Street Northwest, Washington, DC, within minutes of each other on August 3,  with the charges announced on Monday, October 20.

💬KEY QUOTE: “So after a felony of attempted robbery, conviction after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with CSOSA, the judges say, do better, and they let him go. And guess what? Within 10 days, he’s at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Coristine.” – U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights repeated failures in the justice system to hold offenders accountable, leading to further crimes.

IN FULL

Two addidtional suspects in the August 3 attack on former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward “Big Balls” Coristine were charged on Monday for a second criminal assault that occured just minutes prior. Lawrence Cotton Powell, aged 19, and Anthony Taylor, aged 18, have been charged as adults for violently attacking and robbing Ethan Levine before joing a group of around 10 individuals who subsequenly assaulted Coristine as he protected a young woman from the group.

“Today, we are announcing that Lawrence Cotton Powell, who is 19 years of age, along with Anthony Taylor, who is 18 years of age, are now charged with assaulting [Ethan] Levine,”  U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro announced, continuing: “Then, after the robbery and assault of Ethan Levine, they walked in the direction of where another crime occurred. Within minutes, you have heard of this crime. Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old DOGE person who was working in the administration was walking a young woman to her car when he was approached in the 1400 block of Swan Street Northwest.”

“Approximately 10 suspects approached him, and as they did, he pushed the young woman into the car. And he was protecting her from the group, before he was then attacked by multiple suspects who then punched him repeatedly, causing significant injuries to him,” she added.

Pirro also noted that Powell has an extensive prior criminal history, criticizing lenient sentences issued by several judges for allowing him to dodge prison time. “So after a felony of attempted robbery, conviction after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with CSOSA, the judges say, do better, and they let him go. And guess what? Within 10 days, he’s at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Coristine,” she revealed.

The National Pulse reported last week that Washington, D.C. Superior Court Judge Kendra Biggs sentenced two 15-year-olds to probation and no jail time for their roles in the attack on Coristine, claiming that her role is to “rehabilitate,” not punish.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Appeals Court Rules Trump CAN Send National Guard Into Portland.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled two to one to allow President Donald J. Trump to deploy Oregon National Guard troops into Portland, overturning a lower court’s ruling blocking the action.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Oregon Democrat officials, protesters, and a three-judge appellate panel including Judges Ryan Nelson, Bridget Bade, and Susan Graber.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Monday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, covering Portland, Oregon.

💬KEY QUOTE: “After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” — 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

🎯IMPACT: The decision allows the Trump administration to move forward with National Guard deployment while legal challenges continue.

IN FULL

A federal appeals court cleared the way on Monday for President Donald J. Trump to move forward with deploying Oregon National Guard troops into Portland, Oregon, to protect federal facilities and immigration agents, overturning a lower court’s decision that temporarily blocked the action. The three-judge 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled two to one to lift an October 5 restraining order issued by District Court Judge Karin Immergut blocking the deployment.

“After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,” the majority, comprised of Judges Ryan Nelson and Bridget Bade, both Trump appointees, wrote in the ruling. Judge Susan Graber, appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton, dissented.

The decision comes amid ongoing clashes between far-left rioters and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Portland. Notably, Democrat governrment officials Oregon claim the deployment is unnecessary, arguing the publicly documented violent riots are exaggerated.

President Trump’s efforts to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities that have refused to police the violent anti-ICE demonstrations have been frustrated by several far-left judges, though the administration has seen a degree of success overturning the restraining orders at the appellate level. A separate District Court order barring President Trump’s deployment of National Guard to Chicago, Illinois was partially lifted by the 7th Circuit on Saturday—allowing the troops to remain stationed at a nearby Army Reserve base.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.