Local authorities have arrested a 55-year-old man for allegedly driving the wrong way near Vice President Kamala Harris‘s motorcade on Monday evening in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Local news footage released Wednesday showed the close call as the motorcade navigated through the area.
The man reportedly had an open beer can inside his vehicle at the time of the incident. Officers on the scene conducted several field sobriety tests, which he reportedly failed. The motorcade was not involved in any collisions, and Harris was unharmed.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Officials have charged the driver on suspicion of drunk driving, along with second-degree “recklessly endangering safety.” Local media reports suggest the suspect appears to have no memory of driving against traffic.
The incident has focused renewed attention on drunk driving laws and enforcement, with various community leaders emphasizing public safety. Harris’s running mate, Tim Walz, was previously arrested for driving while intoxicated, lying about the incident being the result of a police officer misunderstanding him due to hearing issues until court transcripts were uncovered proving this was untrue.
New reporting tonight from @NickBohrWISN: The Secret Service is looking into how a suspected drunk driver, driving the wrong way on the interstate, came this close to VP Kamala Harris’ motorcade in Milwaukee last night after her event in Waukesha County pic.twitter.com/VEclfwEQVR
❓What Happened: Pro-illegal immigrant protests in Los Angeles, California, have escalated into widespread vandalism, arson, and looting. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is investigating funding sources behind the unrest.
👥 Who’s Involved: A Democratic Party-linked NGO network, including groups like CHIRLA and Unión del Barrio, is suspected of organizing protests. Federal agencies, including the FBI, are probing financial ties.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Protests and riots began in Los Angeles last week, with unrest spreading over the weekend and into this week. National Guard troops and Marines have been deployed by President Donald J. Trump.
💬 Key Quote: “The FBI is investigating any and all monetary connections responsible for these riots,” said FBI Director Kash Patel.
⚠️ Impact: Nearly 200 NGOs are reportedly coordinating efforts to spread unrest nationwide. Protesters have used equipment like “Bionic Shield” masks, distributed on the streets, raising concerns over organized funding and logistics.
IN FULL:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has launched a probe into funding sources behind escalating pro-illegal immigrant riots, which have devolved into acts of vandalism, arson, and looting. Federal authorities are examining the role of Democratic Party-linked non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in orchestrating the unrest, which aligns with previous patterns of mobilization by these groups.
FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed the agency’s focus: “The FBI is investigating any and all monetary connections responsible for these riots,” he said.
Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons echoed the severity of the situation, stating, “If you have to watch out for a burnt car, that isn’t a peaceful protest, that isn’t America. That’s anarchy.”
Among the organizations identified as key players are the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) and Unión del Barrio, a group described as the Mexican counterpart to Black Lives Matter. Unión del Barrio openly promotes Marxist and communist ideologies in its manifesto. These groups reportedly helped initiate the protests, which quickly escalated into widespread civil unrest.
Reports from riot locations suggest the demonstrations are far from grassroots. Observers noted individuals distributing “Bionic Shield” masks, priced between $30 and $50, which aid rioters in resisting law enforcement. Concerns over the origins of such equipment have prompted calls for further investigation into protest logistics.
President Donald J. Trump has deployed National Guard troops and Marines to restore order in Los Angeles. Meanwhile, nearly 200 NGOs reportedly tied to the Democratic Party’s activist network are coordinating efforts to extend the chaos to other cities across the United States.
Former FBI Executive Assistant Director Chris Piehota emphasized the agency’s focus on tracing financial and logistical networks. “You’re gonna see the FBI make a much more aggressive push into some of those areas to cut off their funding and their logistics.”
As federal investigators probe these connections, some lawmakers are raising concerns about potential foreign influence and ideologically driven funding fueling the violence.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Pro-illegal immigrant riots in Seattle, Washington, escalated into violence, with fireworks, rocks, and bottles thrown at police. Fires were set, and barricades were erected.
👥 Who’s Involved: Antifa-aligned rioters, Seattle Police Department (SPD), federal agents, and local journalists.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Wednesday night, outside the Henry M. Jackson Federal Building in downtown Seattle, following a rally at Cal Anderson Park.
💬 Key Quote: Journalist Brandi Kruse reported, “Protesters lit off one of these massive fireworks right in the middle of the Seattle Police bike line. I would be shocked if officers didn’t get injured.”
⚠️ Impact: Eight arrests were made. Fires and vandalism disrupted downtown Seattle, requiring police and fire crews to respond under difficult conditions.
IN FULL:
Pro-illegal immigrant riots turned violent in another American city on Wednesday night, as agitators targeted police officers and federal property in downtown Seattle, Washington. The unrest, which began with a rally at Cal Anderson Park, culminated in fires, vandalism, and attacks on law enforcement near the Henry M. Jackson Federal Building.
The evening began at 7 PM with a gathering in Capitol Hill, where participants carried mass-printed signs, Mexican flags, and wore masks. Marching through Capitol Hill and First Hill, the group converged on the federal building, where tensions escalated after 9:30 PM.
Now: Black bloc Antifa militants have regathered outside the federal building after Seattle PD dispersed the anti-ICE riot.
— Katie Daviscourt 📸 (@KatieDaviscourt) June 12, 2025
By 9:45 PM, rioters, many dressed in black bloc attire, had set fires at makeshift barricades and hurled fireworks, rocks, and bottles at police. Seattle Police Department (SPD) declared the scene a “full-scale riot” and issued dispersal orders, deploying tear gas and bike lines to regain control.
“There’s a little something in the air,” journalist Brandi Kruse reported from the scene. “Protesters lit off one of these massive fireworks right in the middle of the Seattle Police bike line. I would be shocked if officers didn’t get injured.”
A dumpster fire at a nearby intersection required fire crews to respond under SPD protection, as rioters continued to throw projectiles. One man intervened to save an American flag from being burned by the crowd.
🚨🚨BREAKING Seattle Federal Building rioters make SEVERAL direct large firework strikes on police skirmish line
Police close on rioters using mace, rubber bullets and physical force. Absolute CHAOS. On the ground NOW pic.twitter.com/HbCqHmtjnS
— Cam Higby | America First 🇺🇸 (@camhigby) June 12, 2025
SPD confirmed eight arrests were made during the chaos. The riot followed similar unrest on Tuesday when demonstrators removed and burned American flags, barricaded driveways with scooters, and physically confronted federal agents and journalists. Two arrests were made during Tuesday’s incidents.
Authorities had warned earlier in the day that radicals might exploit the rally to commit violence or property damage. Businesses and residents in the area were advised to secure their property and remain vigilant.
The situation was brought under control by approximately 11:30 PM, with the crowd dispersed and fires extinguished. Another protest is scheduled for Saturday, June 14, with police again warning of potential disruptions and criminal activity.
SPD continues to urge the public to report real-time incidents of violence or vandalism by calling 911.
Breaking: Seattle PD moves in on anti-ICE rioters outside the federal building in Seattle. pic.twitter.com/VMEfUHCq2q
— Katie Daviscourt 📸 (@KatieDaviscourt) June 12, 2025
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: The Trump Administration announced a $200 billion investment by Micron Technology to expand U.S. chip manufacturing.
👥 Who’s Involved: Micron Technology, President Donald J. Trump, and American workers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Boise, Idaho, and Manassas, Virginia; announced Thursday, June 12, 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “It’s all part of President Trump’s commitment to revitalizing American manufacturing and establishing the country as the global leader in technology—particularly in artificial intelligence,” the Trump White House said in a statement, adding: “It’s another big win for American workers, national security, and leadership in the world—and the best is yet to come.”
⚠️ Impact: Almost 100,000 jobs will be created, and advanced DRAM production will be onshored from Taiwan, bolstering U.S. technological leadership and national security.
IN FULL:
The Trump Administration has unveiled a $200 billion investment by Micron Technology, aimed at bolstering the United States’ semiconductor manufacturing capabilities. Micron, the only U.S.-based producer of advanced memory chips, will direct the funds toward constructing a second chip fabrication plant in Boise, Idaho, while also modernizing its existing facility in Manassas, Virginia.
This initiative will mark the first time Micron’s advanced DRAM technology is produced domestically, as production is being relocated from Taiwan. The move is expected to create approximately 90,000 direct and indirect jobs, further strengthening the U.S. economy and workforce.
“It’s all part of President Trump’s commitment to revitalizing American manufacturing and establishing the country as the global leader in technology—particularly in artificial intelligence,” the Trump White House said in a statement, adding: “It’s another big win for American workers, national security, and leadership in the world—and the best is yet to come.”
Since taking office, the Trump Administration has secured significant commitments from leading technology firms, including Apple, IBM, NVIDIA, TSMC, and others, resulting in trillions of dollars pledged toward U.S.-based manufacturing and production. The National Pulse reported in February that Apple committed to a $500 billion investment in the U.S. over the next five years, aimed at boosting its artificial intelligence data server needs. Additionally, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) agreed to a $1.4 trillion U.S. investment framework in March that will focus on developing artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, and energy technologies.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A nonprofit called As You Sow, which promotes environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies, launched a for-profit company, As You Know, to sell ESG data. That firm now benefits from climate and diversity rules that As You Sow lobbied to implement, raising concerns that a tax-exempt group is using its influence to generate private financial gain.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The leadership and operations of As You Sow and As You Know are deeply intertwined. Both are run by activist CEO Andrew Behar. Major left-wing donor networks funded the nonprofit, including Arabella Advisors and organizations linked to George Soros. Its advocacy aligns closely with the Biden government’s regulatory efforts.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
🧾KEY QUOTES: “It’s a desperate attempt to hold the patriarchy in power.” — Andy Behar, defending ESG and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in response to growing public and political backlash.
⚠️FALLOUT: Watchdog groups have raised concerns that As You Sow may violate nonprofit tax law by enriching a related private entity. The two organizations share staff, office space, and data resources. The majority of As You Know’s ownership remains undisclosed.
📌SIGNIFICANCE: The situation highlights how nonprofit advocacy can be structured to influence federal policy, steer private capital, and financially benefit affiliated businesses, blurring the legal boundaries between charitable purpose and private profit.
IN FULL:
A California-based nonprofit that promotes environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies is under scrutiny for launching a for-profit company that appears to profit from federal mandates the nonprofit itself pushed into law.
As You Sow, a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit, launched the for-profit company As You Know in 2021. The company markets ESG data products to institutional investors, nonprofit organizations, and universities. The launch coincided with regulatory moves by the Biden government to expand disclosure requirements on corporate climate impact, racial equity policies, and boardroom diversity.
As You Sow disclosed that it purchased 800,000 shares in As You Know at launch. The for-profit entity issued two million shares total, meaning 60 percent of its ownership is held by parties not publicly identified. While federal law allows nonprofits to form for-profit entities, it prohibits them from using tax-exempt resources for private enrichment or allowing insiders to benefit from charitable operations.
SHARED RESOURCES.
The two organizations share leadership, employees, and physical office space. Andrew Behar serves as CEO of both entities and is listed as the registered agent for As You Know. The ESG data sold by the for-profit includes metrics generated by As You Sow over the last three decades, which were produced using donor-funded nonprofit infrastructure.
According to its marketing materials, As You Know holds an “exclusive license” to ESG data on more than 3,000 companies, including information on climate policies, plastic use, political spending, and diversity hiring practices. Many of those topics match shareholder resolutions filed by As You Sow at major U.S. corporations.
In 2023, energy giant ExxonMobil flagged the relationship in a filing opposing a shareholder proposal by As You Sow.
“The recent launch of As You Know, the for-profit arm of As You Sow, which sells data… on topics including plastics – the same topic addressed in the shareholder proposal As You Sow is representing this year,” the filing stated. Exxon noted that the nonprofit had also voted against 80 percent of board director nominees across companies where it provides proxy voting services.
DEFAULT ACTIVISM.
In 2024, As You Sow reported 159 corporate “engagements” and 99 shareholder resolutions. It also launched a platform called My Money My Vote, which enables 401(k) retirement plan participants to automatically vote on shareholder proposals across issues like CEO compensation, political spending, and climate targets. The tool’s default settings favor activist-aligned positions.
Behar, a longtime far-left activist and renewables executive, has defended ESG and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives despite public pushback. In an interview with Fortune magazine, he said, “It’s a desperate attempt to hold the patriarchy in power,” referring to the backlash against ESG standards and social impact investing.
The nonprofit is backed by left-leaning financial networks, including Arabella Advisors and groups tied to billionaire political donor George Soros. These organizations also support advocacy groups and policy think tanks that push federal and state ESG-related regulations.
While As You Sow argues its mission remains focused on long-term stakeholder accountability, critics point to the close alignment between its nonprofit advocacy and the for-profit services offered by As You Know. Watchdogs say the arrangement resembles a closed loop: the nonprofit pushes for ESG compliance, then the for-profit sells metrics to measure it.
No enforcement action has been announced, but the situation has raised calls for greater transparency around As You Know’s ownership and revenue structure. It also highlights the growing intersection of tax-exempt political advocacy and private-sector influence.
As ESG compliance becomes more embedded in corporate governance through federal rulemaking and proxy activism, the financial structures surrounding these efforts are expected to draw increasing attention from regulators, investors, and the public.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: A federal court hearing is taking place in San Francisco regarding President J. Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amid violent riots over immigration enforcement.
👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald Trump, California Governor Gavin Newsom (D), Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D), Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), National Guard troops, and Marines.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Thursday; protests occurred in Los Angeles over the weekend following ICE raids last week.
💬 Key Quote: The Trump administration referred to Newsom’s lawsuit as a “crass political stunt endangering American lives.”
⚠️ Impact: The deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines has sparked a legal battle, raising questions about federal authority.
IN FULL:
A federal court hearing is scheduled for Thursday to address California Governor Gavin Newsom’s (D) lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles following violent riots over immigration enforcement operations.
The protests erupted over the weekend after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted raids last week, leading to the detention and deportation of illegal immigrants. In response, Trump sent 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the city despite objections from Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats.
Newsom filed a lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that Trump’s actions overstep presidential authority and infringe on state powers. Newsom contends that the deployment, initially intended to protect federal buildings, has expanded to include support for immigration enforcement, which he claims could escalate tensions further.
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Breyer—the younger brother of former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer—on Tuesday declined Newsom’s request to immediately limit the National Guard’s law enforcement activities to federal properties. Instead, Breyer scheduled a hearing for Thursday in San Francisco federal court.
The Trump administration dismissed the lawsuit as a politically motivated move, with officials stating on Wednesday that it jeopardizes public safety. “This is a crass political stunt endangering American lives,” a spokesman for the administration said.
As of now, the National Guard has had limited interaction with protesters, while Marines have not been observed in Los Angeles. Military officials confirmed on Tuesday that some National Guard members are stationed near federal agents to provide protection. Although the Guard can temporarily detain individuals who attack officers, arrests remain the responsibility of law enforcement.
❓ What Happened: Federal law enforcement executed a pincer maneuver to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho, an accused Los Angeles rioter who allegedly assaulted a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer, amid violent demonstrations against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detaining illegal aliens.
👥 Who’s Involved: Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), President Donald J. Trump, National Guard, and U.S. Marines.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Incident occurred in Los Angeles on June 11, 2025, with DHS announcement and Trump’s deployment following.
💬 Key Quote: “This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer,” DHS stated.
⚠️ Impact: Trump’s deployment of federal assets to protect ICE personnel and detain rioters counters Democrat inaction and sanctuary policies.
IN FULL:
Federal law enforcement officers executed a pincer maneuver to stop a violent Los Angeles rioter who attempted to flee in a vehicle after allegedly assaulting a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer on Wednesday. The maneuver saw federal law enforcement officers in an SUV drive into the passenger side of the fleeing vehicle, trapping it against another SUV driven by federal agents.
“This was no hit and run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer. When Homeland Security Investigations tried to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho for the assault, he attempted to flee,” the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced in a post containing video of the incident on X (formerly Twitter). “He was ultimately arrested and taken into custody.”
“Our officers are facing a 413 [percent] increase in assaults against them as they put their lives on the line to arrest murders, rapists, and gang members,” DHS stated, adding: “Secretary [Kristi] Noem’s message to the LA rioters is clear: you will not stop us or slow us down. ICE and our federal law enforcement partners will continue to enforce the law.”
“And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” the agency warned.
In response to the violent riots against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) action to deport illegal immigrants in Los Angeles—and the inaction of California’s Democratic political leadership—President Donald J. Trump has deployed 4,000 National Guard soldiers to protect federal agents and property. Additionally, an estimated 700 U.S. Marines are on standby to assist the National Guard if needed.
WATCH:
This was no hit and run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer. When Homeland Security Investigations tried to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho for the assault, he attempted to flee. He was ultimately arrested and taken into custody.
❓What Happened: Nearly all members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board that manages the Fulbright Program resigned, citing alleged interference by the Trump administration in the selection process.
👥 Who’s Involved: Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board members, the Trump administration, and Carmen Estrada-Schaye, the sole remaining board member.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: United States, resignations announced Wednesday.
💬 Key Quote: “To continue to serve after the Administration has consistently ignored the Board’s request that they follow the law would risk legitimizing actions we believe are unlawful and damage the integrity of this storied program and America’s credibility abroad,” the resigning board members stated.
⚠️ Impact: The administration says the resigning board members were partisan Biden-era appointees seeking to undermine President Donald J. Trump.
IN FULL:
Nearly all members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board overseeing the Fulbright scholarship program have stepped down, claiming the Trump administration interfered with the selection process for award recipients. The resignations, announced Wednesday, leave Carmen Estrada-Schaye as the sole remaining board member, who stated, “The president of the United States appointed me and I intend to fill out my term.”
The Fulbright program, established nearly 80 years ago, facilitates international exchanges and diplomacy, awarding approximately 9,000 scholarships annually to students, scholars, and professionals. However, there are concerns in the administration that beneficiaries often have a left-wing, activist bent, leading to increased oversight. Resigning board members allege the administration overstepped its authority by canceling awards for individuals already selected and subjecting 1,200 foreign recipients to an additional review process.
In their statement, the board members argued that these actions undermine the program’s supposedly merit-based selection process and violate its founding principles. “To continue to serve after the Administration has consistently ignored the Board’s request that they follow the law would risk legitimizing actions we believe are unlawful and damage the integrity of this storied program and America’s credibility abroad,” they wrote.
The State Department, which oversees Fulbright, dismissed the claims, asserting that the board members were partisan appointees from the Biden government and accusing them of attempting to undermine President Trump. A department spokesman stated, “The claim that the Fulbright Hayes Act affords exclusive and final say over Fulbright Applications to the Fulbright board is false.”
The resignations come amid broader scrutiny of foreign students under the Trump administration, which has expanded visa restrictions, increased social media vetting, and pushed reforms at institutions like Harvard.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓ What Happened: President Donald J. Trump hinted at an executive order to shield illegal aliens working on farms and in hotels from deportation, sparking backlash from his America First base.
👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump, farmers, hotel/leisure industry leaders, and MAGA supporters.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Announced on Truth Social and in press comments on June 12, 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “We can’t take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don’t have, maybe, what they’re supposed to have [in terms of documentation],” Trump said.
⚠️ Impact: Trump’s potential amnesty move risks fracturing his America First coalition, clashing with promises of mass deportation.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump has hinted that an executive order is in the works to protect illegal aliens working in the agriculture and leisure sectors from deportation, causing disquiet among the America First base. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump argued, “Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace… This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!”
The President subsequently doubled down on these sentiments in comments to the press, saying, “Our farmers are being hurt badly… You know, they have very good workers; they’ve worked for them for 20 years. They’re not citizens, but they’ve turned out to be, you know, great. And we’re going to have to do something about that.”
He insisted, “We can’t take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don’t have, maybe, what they’re supposed to have [in terms of documentation], maybe not.”
“You go into a farm and you look… [The illegal alien workers have] been here for 20, 25 years, and they’ve worked great, and the owner of the farm loves them and everything else, and then you’re supposed to throw them out, and you know what happens? They end up hiring… the criminals that have come in, the murderers from prisons and everything else,” Trump continued.
“So, we’re going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think. We can’t do that to our farmers—and lesirue too, hotels; we’re going to have to use a lot of common sense on that.”
The announcement of what sounds like a potential amnesty is drawing backlash from the MAGA faithful, who expected a second Trump administration to at least attempt the mass deportations of all illegal aliens.
Many argue that bosses’ hunger for cheap, illegal workers has been one of the primary pull factors for illegal aliens, and they should not be rewarded by having their illegal labor forces regularized. Notably, data shows that easy access to such workers has reduced productivity by providing an unlimited pool of low-wage labor, making investment in automation and other efficiency measures unnecessary.
WATCH:
NEW: President Trump says an executive order is potentially coming, allowing some illegal immigrants to stay in the country so farmers don’t run out of workers.
“Our farmers are being hurt badly. They have very good workers.”
❓What Happened:TheWall Street Journal is rushing to the aid of multinational corporations who say their bottom lines are being hurt by President Donald J. Trump’s efforts to deport illegal immigrants from the United States. However, the newspaper, which specializes in economic coverage, ignores entirely the reasonable possibility that declining Hispanic consumption is more likely the result of deflationary pressure and an ongoing credit crunch.
👥 Who’s Involved:The Wall Street Journal, President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Hispanic consumers, and illegal immigrants.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The sprawling Journal story was published late Wednesday, June 11, 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “ICE’s tactics have had a chilling effect on some retailers, store owners and company executives said,” the WSJ story declares.
⚠️ Impact: This isn’t the first time the WSJ has rushed to the defense of illegal immigrants or multinational globalist corporations, with the newspaper attacking President Trump’s move to crack down on visa overstays in February. Additionally, despite once being known for its rigorous economic news coverage, the WSJ appears to completely ignore the impact that declining credit access and deflationary pressure are having on major retailers.
IN FULL:
The globalist Wall Street Journal is fretting that the deportation of illegal immigrants is impacting the bottom line of some of the largest multinational corporations. In a sprawling feature story, the Murdoch-owned newspaper attempts to conflate an overall consumer demand decline across all ethnic groups with President Donald J. Trump‘s efforts to deport violent and dangerous criminal illegal immigrants, arguing that it is the deportations and not other factors that are resulting in falling consumption. Additionally, the Journal appears ambivalent to the positive impacts the deportations are having on native-born American workers, focusing instead on the loss of cheap foreign labor used by corporations.
“ICE’s tactics have had a chilling effect on some retailers, store owners and company executives said,” the Wall Street Journal story declares, before directly blaming White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller for said “chilling effect.”
“Hispanic shoppers reduced visits to physical stores more than non-Hispanic ones in the first quarter of the year, compared with the same period in 2024,” the Journal contends. “Walgreens experienced a 10.5 percentage point decline in Hispanic shoppers in the first quarter, while Home Depot had an 8.7 percentage point drop and Dollar General a 6.1 percentage point decrease.”
However, what the Wall Street Journal ignores is that elevated interest rates, decreased lending, and an increasingly deflationary environment (which usually presents as falling consumer demand) are statistically shown to impact Hispanics and other minority groups at higher rates than America’s white population. Data shows that credit card delinquency rates, for instance, are at a 13-year high, with the total number of consumers who are 90 days or more past due hitting 12.3 percent in Q1 of 2025.
While some individuals interviewed by the Journal claim they’ve cut back on eating out or shopping for fear of ICE raids, the more reasonable—and likely—explanation for the decline is the lack of credit (and overall liquidity) among American consumers as a whole.
In another instance, the Journal claims that big box stores, like Walmart and Target, are offering steep discounts of 50 percent or more to lure Hispanic consumers back to their stores. However, again, in Target’s own earnings report, the company says it has rolled out $1 price point items not to appeal to Hispanics, but rather to attract all consumers, as falling credit and left-wing boycotts over the company’s decision to scrap some of its DEI policies have depressed its sales numbers.
This skewed and disingenuous reasoning is nothing new for the Journal. The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam has noted in the past that The Wall Street Journal has opposed almost any attempt to deport illegal immigrants. For instance, in February, the newspaper threw a fit that President Trump was removing illegal immigrants who had overstayed their visas from the country.
Notably, visa overstays are one of the primary methods for individuals to immigrate to the United States illegally.
❓What Happened: The United States is conducting a review of the AUKUS defence pact with the United Kingdom and Australia.
👥 Who’s Involved: The American, British, and Australian governments; Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby leading the review.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
💬 Key Quote: A British government spokesman called AUKUS “one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades.”
⚠️ Impact: The review raises concerns about potential U.S. withdrawal, as payments from Australia to the U.S. for submarine manufacturing have already begun.
IN FULL:
The Trump administration is reviewing the AUKUS defence pact, a trilateral agreement with the United Kingdom and Australia focused on developing nuclear-powered submarines. The review, led by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, has prompted concerns about the possibility of the U.S. withdrawing from the agreement. Colby has previously expressed some skepticism about building nuclear-powered submarines, a “crown jewel” American asset, to other states.
However, the British Prime Minister’s office has responded to the review, describing it as “understandable” for the U.S. to assess the project. A British government spokesman emphasized the significance of the pact, calling AUKUS “one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades.”
Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles also addressed the review, stating that he had been aware of it for some time and welcomed the process. Marles noted that both the British and Australian governments conducted their own reviews of the agreement following the elections of the countries’ currently governing parties.
Despite the concerns raised by some, U.S. Ambassador to London Warren Stephens has expressed support for the AUKUS partnership. Additionally, Australia has already made the first of six payments, each amounting to $500 million, to the United States for new nuclear submarines, bolstering the American shipbuilding industry.
The AUKUS partnership, announced in 2021, aims to enhance defence cooperation among the three English-speaking allies, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.