Several editors have left the Los Angeles Times newspaper after the newspaper refused to endorse any presidential candidate for the 2024 election. Robert Greene and Karin Klein left the paper along with editorial page editor Mariel Garza. Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong halted the editorial board’s endorsement process as it was preparing to back Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris.
Garza expressed dissatisfaction with the decision: “In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.” Garza, part of the editorial board, said they intended to support Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. She had begun drafting the endorsement editorial before the board’s efforts were stopped.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Robert Greene, who covered various topics including criminal justice and won a Pulitzer Prize in 2021, departed alongside Klein, a former board member who wrote on education and the environment.
Soon-Shiong, in a social media post, explained that he had suggested that the board analyze both the positive and negative aspects of each candidate’s policies and envision their potential impacts over four years. He claimed he aimed to provide readers with non-partisan information to make informed decisions.
Nika Soon-Shiong, the daughter of Patrick Soon-Shiong, has previously promoted far-left policies and pro-Palestinian politicians, posting and reposting content criticizing the Harris-Walz campaign and Biden-Harris government over their stance on Israel.
The paper is just the latest largely liberal outlet, including the Washington Post, to refuse to endorse Vice President Harris in recent weeks. Reports claim that tech billionaire and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who owns the Post, prevented an endorsement.
Several outlets have endorsed Harris, including The Atlantic magazine and the allegedly conservative Spectator magazine’s new editor, Michael Gove.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is set to request the Supreme Court to overturn a $5 million verdict in a civil case funded by a Democrat megadonor, where he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The case involves President Trump and writer E. Jean Carroll.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Application for review submitted on September 3, 2025, with the petition seeking an extension until November 10.
💬KEY QUOTE: “President Trump intends to seek review by this Court of significant issues arising from the Second Circuit’s erroneous decision,” stated the president’s counsel.
🎯IMPACT: Trump continues to challenge the verdict, asserting that various lawsuits against him are politically motivated.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump is expected to approach the Supreme Court in an attempt to reverse a $5 million verdict from a civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll. The 2023 lawsuit saw a $5 million jury verdict that held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming the writer and alleged fabulist. Carroll accused Trump of raping her nearly 30 years ago in a prestigious department store, in changing rooms that are usually locked and attended by staff. He has consistently denied the allegations.
Carroll, who could not recall even the year of the alleged attack with confidence, has accused at least seven other men and boys of assaulting her in unrelated cases over several decades.
In an application to the Supreme Court, Trump’s legal team wrote, “President Trump intends to seek review by this Court of significant issues arising from the Second Circuit’s erroneous decision.” The petition also requests an extension until November 10, allowing more time to formally ask for the case to be heard by the nation’s highest court.
The case has been part of Trump’s continued legal battles. Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $83 million in a second civil trial, a decision that Trump is also appealing.
Trump claims that the lawsuits he faces are driven by political motives. Notably, a dubious civil fraud verdict against the America First leader in a case brought by Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James was recently thrown out on appeal.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: An effort to censure Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was blocked after some Republicans joined Democrats to vote against it.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), and several other Republicans and Democrats in the House.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 3, 2025, in the U.S. House of Representatives.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m going to have some conversations with my colleagues, with Ms. McIver in particular, and some of our leadership.” – Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY)
🎯IMPACT: The censure resolution against McIver was tabled, creating uncertainty as to whether a similar measure against Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) will proceed.
IN FULL
A censure resolution aimed at Representative LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was thwarted in the House after a coalition of Democrats and Republicans-in-name-only (RINOs) voted against it. The resolution, initiated by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), sought to reprimand McIver for her involvement in the alleged assault of federal law enforcement officers outside an immigration detention center in May.
Five Republicans, including Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Mike Flood (R-NE) joined Democrats in voting to table the measure. =Reps. Dave Joyce (R-OH), Mike Turner (R-OH), and David Valadao (R-CA) also voted for the table motion. Two other Republicans, Reps. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) and Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) opted to vote present. Rep. Turner claimed after the roll call that he inadvertently voted to kill the censure measure, though his vote would not have changed the final outcome.
The incident in question occurred during an oversight visit to a Newark, New Jersey, facility, where McIver and other Democratic officials were present and ended up physically interfering with law enforcement. Federal agents arrested the city’s mayor, Ras Baraka, and charges against McIver were eventually brought by acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba, accusing the Congresswoman of assaulting federal agents.
McIver has denied all allegations, with her legal team asserting that federal agents’ actions led to an “unnecessary, reckless, and disproportionate escalation” at the scene.
The failed censure of McIver has prompted Democrats to consider withdrawing a similar resolution brought against Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) in retaliation, as they weigh their next steps. Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), who is the sponsor of the censure measure against Mills, said after the McIver vote: “I’m going to have some conversations with my colleagues, with Ms. McIver in particular, and some of our leadership, and we’ll make that determination.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States is projected to experience its first-ever population decline due to a significant drop in immigration numbers.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), President Donald J. Trump, and the U.S. State Department.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Forecasts for 2025, across the United States.
🎯IMPACT: A potential population decrease of 6,000 people, with a 96 percent drop in net immigration at the low end of predictions.
IN FULL
The United States could see its population shrink for the first time in history, as new forecasts predict a dramatic drop in immigration numbers. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) has projected that net international immigration could fall to as low as negative 525,000 in 2025. With a net of 519,000 births reported in last year’s Census, this would result in a population decrease of 6,000 people.
The AEI forecast suggests net immigration could plummet from 2.8 million to between 115,000 and negative 525,000, marking a 96 percent decline at the low end of predictions. Notably, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that 1.6 million illegal immigrants have voluntarily left the U.S. since President Donald J. Trump returned to the White House. Additionally, DHS figures reveal that over 359,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested, and 332,000 deported, within the first 200 days of the new administration.
The U.S. State Department has also implemented a new policy subjecting visa holders to “continuous vetting.” This includes reviewing the records of 55 million foreigners with valid U.S. visas to determine if they have violated any rules. If infractions such as overstaying visas or engaging in criminal activity are discovered, visas may be revoked, potentially leading to deportation. A statement from the department emphasized, “We review all available information as part of our vetting, including law enforcement or immigration records of any other information that comes to light after visa issuance indicating a potential liability.”
The policy shift represents a significant escalation in curbing mass migration and in deportation efforts aimed at removing millions of illegal immigrants who entered the United States under the former Biden government.
President Trump’s administration has also increased restrictions and requirements for visa applicants, including mandatory in-person interviews, in light of new national security and public safety concerns.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal appeals court ruled that President Donald J. Trump cannot use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Tuesday, September 3, 2025, in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “A country’s encouraging its residents and citizens to enter this country illegally is not the modern-day equivalent of sending an armed, organized force to occupy, to disrupt, or to otherwise harm the United States,” the court wrote in its ruling.
🎯IMPACT: The decision blocks the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal immigrants, though other legal avenues for deportation remain available.
IN FULL
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that President Donald J. Trump cannot use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelan illegal immigrant members of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang. The administration had invoked the 18th-century wartime law in March to deport 137 alleged gang members to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).
The law allows presidents to deport people from enemy countries during an “invasion or predatory incursion.” However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the activities of the TdA gang do not constitute an “invasion” or “predatory incursion.” The court stated, “There is no finding that this mass immigration was an armed, organized force or forces.”
Since retaking office in January, the Trump administration has deported over 6,000 Venezuelans, including 238 sent to CECOT earlier this year. Family members and illegal immigrant advocates claim that many of those deported have no criminal record or gang ties—though evidence from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) suggests otherwise.
The case originated with illegal immigrants detained in Texas who sued to block their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. After the lower court dismissed the case, the Supreme Court intervened, ruling that the Fifth Circuit was wrong to dismiss the matter and that illegal immigrants had not been given adequate notice of their deportations.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Utah announced a settlement action and consent order against a number of adult content websites, including Pornhub and RedTube, that are operated by Aylo (formerly MindGeek).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Christopher Mufarrige, Utah state officials, Pornhub, RedTube, YouPorn, and Aylo.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The FTC announced the settlement action and consent order on Wednesday, September 3, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Pornhub’s operators turned a blind eye to the proliferation of videos depicting the sexual abuse of children on its sites so it could profit off this exploitation. Under the order we’re announcing today, Pornhub’s operators will be required to take concrete steps to block this harmful content and ensure that those who appear in videos on their sites are consenting adults.” — Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection
🎯IMPACT: The settlement action and consent order impose a $15 million federal fine against Aylo, which will be suspended if the company pays a lesser $5 million fine to Utah. Additionally, Aylo will be required to no longer misrepresent its policies regarding child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and nonconsensual material (NCM).
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump‘s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on Wednesday that it will join Utah in a settlement action and consent order against a number of adult content websites, including Pornhub and RedTube. The Utah Attorney General’s office and the FTC contend the websites “deceived users by doing little to block tens of thousands of videos and photos featuring child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and nonconsensual material (NCM) despite claiming that this content was ‘strictly prohibited.'”
“Pornhub’s operators turned a blind eye to the proliferation of videos depicting the sexual abuse of children on its sites so it could profit off this exploitation,” the FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Christopher Mufarrige, said in a statement. He continued: “Under the order we’re announcing today, Pornhub’s operators will be required to take concrete steps to block this harmful content and ensure that those who appear in videos on their sites are consenting adults.”
FTC Commissioner Melissa Holyoak accused the adult content websites of having “inflicted grave harm on children and nonconsenting adults by promoting and distributing truly horrific material online.” She added: “As today’s complaint and proposed order make clear, the FTC will use every tool in its arsenal to stop such outrageous conduct.”
The proposed settlement and consent order take direct action against Pornhub’s parent company, Aylo—formerly known as MindGeek—which operates more than 100 pornographic photo and video-streaming websites. Among Aylo’s largest pornographic website properties are Pornhub, YouPorn, and RedTube, which boast hundreds of millions of monthly visitors in the United States alone.
Utah and the FTC contend that Aylo “deceived users by claiming it has zero tolerance for CSAM and works to block CSAM and NCM on its sites by, among other things, taking prompt action when videos are flagged by users.” However, in reality, the company—according to Utah’s complaint—failed to take any concrete action to remove flagged content, ban uploaders of CSAM, or prevent the reupload of removed content.
The settlement action and consent order impose a $15 million federal fine against Aylo, which will be suspended if the company pays a lesser $5 million fine to Utah. Additionally, Aylo will be required to no longer misrepresent its policies regarding CSAM and NCM.
Other provisions include a requirement for Aylo to enact “a program to prevent the publication or dissemination of CSAM and NCM content,” a thorough verification system for those appearing in uploaded content, and to remove offending content uploaded prior to the “implementation of the CSAM and NCM prevention program.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Liberal Police Department in Kansas has reportedly refused to assist in locating an illegal immigrant fugitive wanted for child rape if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is involved in the case.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Democrat Mayor Jose Lara, fugitive Guatemalan illegal alien Juan Ralios-Batz, the Liberal Police Department, U.S. Marshals, and federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The case is ongoing in Liberal, Kansas, with connections to Nebraska. The crimes occurred over the past two years.
🎯IMPACT: The refusal to cooperate with ICE could hinder efforts to capture a foreign fugitive wanted for heinous crimes, raising concerns about public safety and immigration law enforcement.
IN FULL
The local police department in Liberal, Kansas, has stated it will no longer assist a U.S. Marshals Task Force in locating an illegal immigrant fugitive wanted for the rape and impregnation of a teenage minor if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) becomes involved in the investigation. The fugitive, Juan Ralios-Batz, a Guatemalan national believed to be 40 years old, is accused of repeatedly raping a female 13-year-old unaccompanied alien child (UAC) over two years.
Liberal Mayor Jose Lara (D) reportedly has a history of opposing federal immigration enforcement. Federal sources now say he has barred the Liberal Police Department from working with ICE in any capacity.
Notably, the teenage victim in the case—who authorities believe may have been trafficked into the U.S.—was impregnated by Ralios-Batz. The minor crossed into the U.S. illegally under the Biden government after being sponsored by the fugitive’s sister.
Ralios-Batz is wanted on multiple charges, including three counts of child rape, aggravated kidnapping, human trafficking, and child abuse. Federal sources disclosed that he unlawfully reentered the U.S. after a previous deportation, and his family may have helped him relocate to Nebraska to evade capture. A relative of his is already serving jail time for the rape of another unaccompanied alien child.
Federal investigators also discovered that several illegal immigrants interviewed during the search for Ralios-Batz had obtained REAL IDs using Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) issued under the Biden government. These documents were reportedly granted without rigorous verification of identity.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A House Judiciary Committee hearing transformed into a debate over online content rules and their impact on Western values after Reform Party leader Nigel Farage testified on the erosion of free speech rights in the United Kingdom.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, Jim Jordan (R-OH), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), and others.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 3, 2025, at a House Judiciary Committee hearing.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’ve kind of forgotten the Voltairian principles that we will fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom.” – Nigel Farage
🎯IMPACT: The hearing intensified the debate on censorship in the United Kingdom and online speech regulations.
IN FULL
Testimony to the House Judiciary Committee by Nigel Farage, leader of Britain’s populist Reform Party, on the state of free speech in his country on Wednesday quickly turned into a debate over online content rules and their impact on Western freedoms. Farage raised cases like those of Graham Linehan, an Irish comedy writer arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport for social media posts about transgenderism that he sent while in the United States, and Lucy Connolly, a mother of young children imprisoned for making unflattering comments about asylum seekers in the wake of a mass stabbing in Southport, England.
“We’ve kind of forgotten the Voltairian principles that we will fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom,” Farage told the committee, chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).
Of Linehan’s case in particular, he stressed, “He’s not even a British citizen. He’s an Irish citizen. This could happen to any American man or woman that goes to Heathrow that has said things online that the British government and British police don’t like,” adding: “At what point did we become North Korea? Well, I think [Linehan] found that out two days ago.”
Farage criticized Britain’s new Online Safety Act and similar censorship regulations in the European Union (EU), warning Europe was falling into an “awful, authoritarian situation” and cautioning America not to go down the same path.
Committee member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who has clashed with Farage before, attempted to undermine the Brexit champion, suggesting he did not really believe in free speech because he once opposed allowing pro-Palestinian protesters to demonstrate practically on top of a Remembrance Sunday service honoring Britain’s war dead. Raskin also interrogated Farage over his party supposedly not giving interviews or press credentials to certain media outlets and journalists, although the Democrat failed to explain how this would be comparable to law enforcement arresting social media users for “grossly offensive” posts.
The hearing is ongoing…
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Colombian President Gustavo Petro criticized a U.S. military strike on a drug trafficking vessel, calling it “murder.”
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Colombian President Gustavo Petro, the Trump administration, the U.S. military, and Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua organization.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The strike occurred on Tuesday in the southern Caribbean; Petro’s comments followed on Wednesday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Those who transport drugs are not the big narcos, but very poor young people from the Caribbean and the Pacific.” – Gustavo Petro
🎯IMPACT: The strike killed 11 cartel operatives, sparking criticism from Petro and highlighting ongoing tensions over U.S. anti-drug policies.
IN FULL
Colombian President Gustavo Petro has condemned a U.S. military strike on a Venezuelan Tren de Aragua drug trafficking vessel, labeling the operation “murder.” The strike, which took place on Tuesday in the southern Caribbean, resulted in the deaths of 11 traffickers designated as “narcoterrorists” by President Donald J. Trump.
Petro complained, “Those who transport drugs are not the big narcos, but very poor young people from the Caribbean and the Pacific.” He further complained that, for decades, drug transporters had been captured without being killed.
Colombia, the world’s largest exporter of cocaine, has faced decades of violence at the hands of cartels and communist militias involved in the drug trade. Petro, a former member of the violent Marxist 19th of April Movement (M-19) urban guerrilla faction, has sought to negotiate with armed groups since taking office in 2023. However, criminal organizations—especially Colombia’s infamous drug cartels—have only grown stronger during his tenure.
According to United Nations (UN) data, Colombia exported a record 2,664 metric tons of cocaine in 2023. Relatedly, the United States saw nearly 30,000 cocaine-related overdose deaths in the same year, driven predominantly by the drug increasingly being cut with fentanyl. President Donald J. Trump designated several Latin American cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and authorized military action against them in February.
Petro has previously courted controversy by claiming that cocaine is banned globally because it is primarily produced in Latin America, insisting it is “not worse than whiskey.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A newly released congressional video fills a one-minute gap in earlier surveillance footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s jail unit on the night of his 2019 death.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The House Oversight Committee, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The footage covers the disputed minute from 11:58:59 PM on August 9, 2019, to midnight on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City.
💬KEY QUOTE: Attorney General Pam Bondi previously said, “What we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing”—but it appears this was inaccurate.
🎯IMPACT: The new footage raises further questions about the official narrative concerning Epstein’s death.
IN FULL
New video from the jail unit where child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein died has filled in a “missing minute” from previously released surveillance footage. The video, included in a nearly 34,000-file release by the House Oversight Committee, covers the critical minute absent from earlier footage outside Epstein’s cell block at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City.
The missing minute spanned from 11:58:59 PM on August 9, 2019, to midnight on August 10, 2019. Digital forensics experts had previously discovered that supposedly “raw” footage released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) had been edited and merged using Adobe Premiere Pro, raising suspicions about evidence tampering.
The new footage clarifies that the camera data switched around midnight, requiring two clips to be combined for seamless video. Merging the clips appears to reveal no gap in the footage—contradicting Attorney General Pam Bondi’s earlier explanation for the missing minute. Bondi had claimed, “What we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing.”
This is not the first time Bondi has appeared to contradict herself on the Epstein case, with the current controversy around his death stemming from a DOJ memo stating that no Epstein “client list” exists, despite the fact she said a client list was “on [her] desk” in February.
The new video shows no previously undiscovered activity inside the jail block during the “missing minute.” The DOJ continues to assert that Epstein died by suicide in his cell while awaiting prosecution.
Notably, the footage released to the public does not cover Epstein’s cell door, only a corridor outside his cell block. While officials insist the released footage shows no one could have reached Epstein’s cell, analysts for CBS News have disputed this, noting it does not fully cover the cell block entrance or the staircase leading to Epstein’s level.
“To say that there’s no way that someone could get to that, the stairs up to his room, without being seen, is false,” they insist.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean autocrat Kim Jong-Un gathered in Beijing, China, along with a handful of other world leaders to celebrate the 80th anniversary of World War II, though the event was overshadowed by Xi and Putin’s hot mic conversation regarding organ harvesting and immortality.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean autocrat Kim Jong-Un, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and several other world leaders.
📍WHEN & WHERE: September 2 and 3, China.
💬KEY QUOTE: “With the development of biotechnology, human organs can be continuously transplanted, and people can live longer and longer, and even achieve immortality.” — Vladimir Putin
🎯IMPACT: The sparsely attended event suggests that China and Russia continue to struggle to muster support for an anti-American global economic and political bloc outside their direct spheres of influence.
IN FULL
Around two dozen world leaders gathered in Beijing, China, yesterday for what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) billed as a celebration of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the Imperial Japanese occupation of the East Asian country. While the event featured Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean autocrat Kim Jong-Un prominently—along with a military parade showcasing the Chinese military’s weaponry—a U.S. delegation was noticeably absent. This fact—despite the United States having played the preeminent role in the war’s Pacific theater—did not go unnoticed by U.S. President Donald J. Trump.
“The big question to be answered is whether or not President Xi of China will mention the massive amount of support and ‘blood’ that The United States of America gave to China in order to help it to secure its FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader,” President Trumpwrote late Tuesday night in a post on Truth Social. “Many Americans died in China’s quest for Victory and Glory. I hope that they are rightfully Honored and Remembered for their Bravery and Sacrifice! May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration.”
“Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America,” he added.
In a 90-minute military parade, China showcased what it says is the latest in its military technology before 24 world leaders—mostly from former Soviet Socialist Republics and a handful of politically isolated nations like Iran. However, what the CCP hoped would be a global flex of its military prowess is being overshadowed by a hot mic moment where Xi and Putin, along with Kim Jong-Un, were discussing the use of organ transplants to prolong their lives to 150 years.
“Earlier, people rarely lived to 70, but these days at 70 years you’re still a child,” said Xi, 72, through a translator to Putin, also 72, as a smiling Kim walked next to them. Putin—also through a translator—responded to Xi, “With the development of biotechnology, human organs can be continuously transplanted, and people can live longer and longer, and even achieve immortality.”
“Predictions are, this century, there’s a chance of also living to 150,” Xi said, eliciting approving laughter from Putin and Kim.
The exchange is notable as Russia, North Korea, and especially China have all been accused of engaging in illicit organ harvesting, with allegations suggesting organs are sometimes taken by force from healthy young adults who are political dissidents or ethnic minorities. Notably, China has been accused of harvesting organs from members of the Falun Gong movement and the Uyghur ethnic minority group.
WATCH 🚨 Hot mic moment on CCTV in China today: Putin and Xi, both 72, were caught casually chatting about living to 150 years — or maybe forever — thanks to organ transplants pic.twitter.com/5kSPqUOsDL
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
