Thursday, December 4, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

WaPo Drops Near 10% of Its Subscribers After Bezos Blocks Harris Endorsement.

The Washington Post is facing a revolt not only among its staff and editorial board but also among its most anti-Trump subscribers. Following the newspaper’s decision—influenced by owner and tech billionaire Jeff Bezos—not to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential race, The Post has seen over 200,000 digital readers cancel their subscriptions as of Monday afternoon.

With a total readership estimated to be around 2.5 million, The Washington Post has seen nearly 10 percent of its total subscriber base evaporate in a matter of days. The Post has struggled to remain financially viable in recent years and largely relies on cash injections from Bezos to stay afloat.

THE NON-ENDORSEMENT.

Late last week, the newspaper—whose slogan, adopted in 2017 in protest of President Donald J. Trump, is “Democracy Dies in Darkness”—shocked the American political landscape when it declined to make a presidential endorsement for the first time since 1988. Will Lewis, the newspaper’s Chief Executive and Publisher, justified the decision as a move to reaffirm The Post’s independence.

Meanwhile, management at The Washington Post is reportedly concerned that the cancellations will continue to rise with its left-wing readership unsated. Marcus Brauchli, former Executive Editor of The Post, described the cancellations as significant and suggested a lack of communication and transparency by Bezos and Lewis regarding the endorsement decision is fueling the anger.

“The problem is, people don’t know why the decision was made. We basically know the decision was made but we don’t know what led to it,” Brauchli said in a recent interview with NPR. However, the former Executive Editor cautions subscribers from acting rashly, arguing: “It is a way to send a message to ownership but it shoots you in the foot if you care about the kind of in-depth, quality journalism like The Post produces.”

STAFF JUMP SHIP.

Meanwhile, the internal strife at The Washington Post is becoming increasingly untenable as well. At least two columnists and two editorial board members have resigned in protest. Molly Roberts, an eight-year veteran of the newspaper, quit on Monday, and fellow board member David Hoffman is said to be following suit. Additionally, columnist Michele Norris and editor-at-large Robert Kagan bolted from the paper over the weekend.

Kagan has gone on to insinuate that Bezos’s decision not to endorse is driven by business interests. He notes that Bezos-owned Blue Origin holds substantial NASA contracts and that the company allegedly met with Trump soon after the endorsement decision became public.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Senate Democrats Reveal Plan to Keep Obamacare on Life Support.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senate Democrats unveiled a plan to extend expiring Obamacare subsidies for three years without reforms, but Senate Republicans are unlikely to support it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), and other Senate Republicans and Democrats.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The proposal was announced on Thursday, with a vote expected next Thursday, December 11, in the U.S. Senate.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.” – Chuck Schumer

🎯IMPACT: The debate over the subsidies could affect healthcare premiums and whether reforms like income caps or abortion funding restrictions are included.

IN FULL

Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), revealed on Thursday their legislative proposal to extend Obamacare subsidies for three years without any changes or reforms. Schumer announced the legislation on the Senate floor, stating, “This is the bill, a clean, three-year extension of [Obamacare] tax credits that Democrats will bring to the floor of the Senate for a vote next Thursday. And every single Democrat will support it.”

Republicans, however, are already balking over the lack of reforms in the proposal. They have advocated for measures such as income caps and restrictions to prevent taxpayer dollars from funding abortions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) indicated a willingness to consider proposals, but a bipartisan compromise has yet to emerge.

Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Mike Crapo (R-ID) have been working on a Republican alternative, which centers on redirecting subsidy funds into Healthcare Savings Accounts (HSAs) rather than paying insurance companies directly. Despite discussions during a closed-door meeting this week, no unified Republican strategy has been finalized.

Schumer warned that failure to pass the Democrats’ plan could lead to significant premium increases for Americans starting in January. He stated, “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.”

The Senate is expected to vote on the proposal by December 11, as Congress races to address a range of legislative priorities before the year ends.

Image by Adrian Hon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Alleged January 6 Pipe Bomber’s Family Are Democrat Donors.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The family of January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr. are donors to the Democratic Party, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr., his father Brian Cole Sr., and Tennessee Democrat state Representative Vincent Dixie.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The pipe bombs were planted at the DNC and RNC on January 5, 2021, with Cole Jr. being arrested on December 4, 2025.

🎯IMPACT: An individual who is either Brian Cole Jr. himself or his father, Brian Cole Sr., contributed $3,000 to Vincent Dixie, a Democrat state Representative in Tennessee. Meanwhile, Cole Jr. has been “linked to statements in support of anarchist ideology.”

IN FULL

The family of January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr. are donors to the Democratic Party, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. An individual who is either Brian Cole Jr. himself or his father, Brian Cole Sr., contributed $3,000 to Vincent Dixie, a Democrat state Representative in Tennessee. Meanwhile, Cole Jr. has been “linked to statements in support of anarchist ideology.”

Business records associated with the Cole family’s address show Brian Cole Sr. runs an immigration bond company currently operating under the name Statewide Bonding Inc., though it appears there are prior iterations of the company under different names. In April 2025, Cole Sr. was barred from writing bonds in the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District of Tennessee after a state appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that Cole and an employee had been untruthful in their testimony to the court and failed to disclose prior bankruptcies.

Immigration bonds, such as those issued by Cole Sr.’s company, operate similarly to traditional bail bonds in criminal proceedings. An immigration bond is a financial guarantee posted by a friend, family member, or bail bondsman to ensure a detained immigrant will appear at all future immigration hearings. This allows the individual to be released from immigration detention while their case is ongoing. The bond amount varies and is determined by factors like flight risk and danger to the community.

Notably, from 2019 to 2021, Cole Sr. was party to a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleging that the department’s administration of immigration bonds, including issuing incomplete Notice to Appear (NTA) forms and failing to send copies to bond guarantors, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and due process rights. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately threw out the lawsuit.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

BREAKING: DOJ, FBI Hold Press Conference on Arrest of Alleged Jan 6 Pipe Bomber.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are holding a press conference on the arrest of Brian Cole for allegedly planting pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, and suspect Brian Cole.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The arrest was made on December 4, 2025, in Woodbridge, Virginia.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Folks, this is what it’s like when you work for a president who tells you to go get the bad guys and stop focusing on other, extraneous things not related to law enforcement.” – Dan Bongino

🎯IMPACT: The arrest highlights a shift in focus back to law enforcement priorities under President Donald J. Trump’s administration.

IN FULL

Attorney General Pam Bondi, alongside Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, are holding a press conference on the arrest of Brian Cole, the suspect linked to the planting of pipe bombs at the Democratic and Republican National Committees on January 5, 2021.

The arrest was made in Woodbridge, Virginia, and stemmed not from new tips, but from a comprehensive review of existing evidence that had not been properly examined under the former Joe Biden government.

Dan Bongino, who led the investigation, emphasized how a change in focus under President Donald J. Trump had enabled the breakthrough, stating, “Folks, this is what it’s like when you work for a president who tells you to go get the bad guys and stop focusing on other, extraneous things not related to law enforcement.”

WATCH:

This story is developing…

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ Indictment Alleges ChatGPT Aided Violent Stalker.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT encouraged a man accused of stalking multiple women to continue his behavior, acting as a “best friend” and reinforcing his actions.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Brett Michael Dadig, a 31-year-old man indicted on charges of cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and interstate threats, alongside ChatGPT, which allegedly played a role in encouraging his actions.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The indictment was announced by the DOJ on Tuesday, involving victims across five states.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Dadig stalked and harassed more than 10 women by weaponizing modern technology and crossing state lines, and through a relentless course of conduct, he caused his victims to fear for their safety and suffer substantial emotional distress.” – Troy Rivetti, First Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights growing concerns over AI chatbots enabling harmful behavior, with implications for mental health and personal safety.

IN FULL

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges in an indictment filed on Tuesday that ChatGPT encouraged Brett Michael Dadig, a man accused of harassing over a dozen women across five states, to persist in his stalking behavior. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, reportedly acted as a “best friend,” entertaining his rants against women and advising him to ignore criticism.

Dadig, 31, was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and interstate threats. According to the DOJ, Dadig used digital communications and social media to harass and intimidate his victims, causing them fear and emotional distress. Troy Rivetti, First Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, stated, “Dadig stalked and harassed more than 10 women by weaponizing modern technology and crossing state lines, and through a relentless course of conduct, he caused his victims to fear for their safety and suffer substantial emotional distress.”

The indictment revealed that Dadig hosted a podcast where he expressed vitriolic views against women, often using slurs and even issuing threats. On his show, he discussed how ChatGPT served as his “therapist” and “best friend,” encouraging him to continue creating content that generated “haters,” which he equated with relevance and monetization. The chatbot reportedly told him that “God’s plan for him was to build a ‘platform’ and to ‘stand out when most people water themselves down.’”

Dadig allegedly used ChatGPT to ask questions about women, including where he might meet a future wife. The chatbot suggested he frequent gyms and athletic communities, advice he followed to the detriment of his victims. In one instance, he stalked a woman at her Pilates studio, sending unsolicited explicit photos and harassing her to the point she had to relocate and reduce her working hours. In another case, he confronted a woman in a parking lot, groped her, and put his hands around her neck.

The case underscores growing concerns about the potential dangers of AI chatbots, including their role in enabling harmful behavior and their ability to gather and share sensitive information. Reports suggest that other AI platforms, such as Elon Musk’s Grok, have been used to doxx individuals, providing personal details such as addresses, phone numbers, and family information.

Image by Jernej Furman.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Govt Watchdog Uncovers $94m in Obamacare Subsidies Fraudulently Paid for Dead People.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Government Accountability Office (GAO) uncovered fraud in Obamacare subsidies, including $94 million paid to insurers for dead people.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The GAO, House Ways and Means Committee, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Findings announced on December 3, 2025, covering data from several years prior, affecting the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) marketplaces.

💬KEY QUOTE: “GAO’s troubling report is the smoking gun that shows how this broken system, shielded by Democrat policies, has led to the federal government shoveling tens of billions of tax dollars to insurance companies through identity fraud and caused health care costs to skyrocket for all Americans.” – Congressman Jason Smith (R-MO)

🎯IMPACT: Taxpayers could be losing up to $27 billion annually due to improper Obamacare payments, while patients face higher costs and denied or delayed care.

IN FULL

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has revealed significant fraud in the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) subsidy system, including $94 million paid to insurers for people who were dead. The findings, announced by the GOP-led House Ways and Means Committee, suggest there are systemic problems in how Obamacare is administered. In total, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the fraud costs taxpayers upwards of $27 billion annually.

According to the GAO, 58,000 Social Security Numbers (SSNs) that received advanced premium tax credits matched Social Security death data. Of these, at least 7,000 individuals were confirmed to have died before their coverage began. Investigators also created fictitious identities using fake or never-issued SSNs, all of which were approved for subsidized Obamacare coverage. Many of these approvals occurred without document verification, even when fake documents, including fake citizenship eligibility papers, were submitted.

The investigation found that monthly subsidies paid to health insurers on behalf of these fraudulent identities exceeded $12,300. In one case, a single SSN was used to apply for over 125 insurance policies, amounting to 26,000 days of coverage—equivalent to 71 years. In 2023 alone, 66,000 SSNs were associated with more than a year’s worth of subsidized coverage.

Additionally, the GAO discovered $21 billion in subsidies paid out in 2023 without evidence of tax reconciliation—accounting for about 23 percent of the $92 billion in total Obamacare subsidies that year. Complaints filed with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) revealed 275,000 cases of Americans being enrolled in or switched to plans without their consent. Of these, 160,000 unauthorized changes were attributed to actions by three or more brokers.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) stated, “While Democrats defend waste, fraud, and abuse, Republicans are taking action to lower health care costs and protect care for all real, living Americans. GAO’s troubling report is the smoking gun that shows how this broken system, shielded by Democrat policies, has led to the federal government shoveling tens of billions of tax dollars to insurance companies through identity fraud and caused health care costs to skyrocket for all Americans.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

House GOP Introduces Bills to Block CCP Influence in U.S. Education.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Three bills aimed at countering Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence in the U.S. education system are set to be considered on the House floor.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: House Republicans, as well as Select Committee Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The bills are expected to be considered this week in the House of Representatives.

💬KEY QUOTE: “China wants to influence what American students learn in classrooms from kindergarten through college.” – Chairman John Moolenaar.

🎯IMPACT: The legislation aims to safeguard American students from CCP propaganda and foreign influence in schools.

IN FULL

Three bills aimed at countering alleged influence by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in U.S. schools and universities, H.R. 1069, H.R. 1049, and H.R. 1105, are poised for debate in the House of Representatives. The bills respond to mounting concern over CCP-sponsored programs in American institutions, including claims that Chinese nationals have smuggled biological materials under the guise of academic research.

Representative John Moolenaar (R-MI), chair of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said, “China wants to influence what American students learn in classrooms from kindergarten through college.” He added that the proposed legislation is comprised of “commonsense bills” that will “protect [American students] from Chinese propaganda and shine a light on how China tries to influence our education system.”

Among the proposals, H.R. 1069, the PROTECT Our Kids Act, would block federal funding to schools with financial ties to the CCP. H.R. 1049, the TRACE Act, would require schools to disclose foreign influence and funding to parents. The third measure, H.R. 1105, the CLASS Act, would prohibit schools from accepting funds or contracts from the CCP or its affiliates and require any foreign funding to be reported to the U.S. Department of Education.

These proposals emerge amid mounting evidence of CCP-linked funding and influence in U.S. higher education. A 2025 investigation found that some institutions failed to disclose hundreds of millions of dollars in Chinese gifts or contracts as required under U.S. law. A recent congressional review also reported that the CCP has exploited joint American–Chinese research institutes to gain access to taxpayer-funded research and to advance China’s military and technological goals.

Proponents of the legislation argue that by cutting off financial ties and increasing transparency, these bills will help safeguard academic freedom, protect students from foreign propaganda, and reduce the risk of illicit technology transfer and espionage on American soil.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

January 6 Pipe Bomb Suspect Named as ‘Anarchist’ Brian Cole.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) arrested a suspect in connection with pipe bombs placed near Capitol Hill on January 5, 2021.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Brian Cole, identified as an “anarchist” from Woodbridge, Virginia, and the FBI.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Arrest occurred on Thursday morning; bombs were placed near Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The arrest marks the first major breakthrough in the five-year investigation.” – FBI Source

🎯IMPACT: The arrest may cause embarrassment for the FBI as existing evidence could have led to an earlier capture.

IN FULL

Brian Cole, a Virginia resident, has been named as the suspect apprehended by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for allegedly planting pipe bombs near Capitol Hill the evening before the January 6 riots in 2021. He has been “linked to statements in support of anarchist ideology,” according to two MS NOW sources. Federal authorities are raiding an address in Woodbridge, Virginia, linked to the suspect.

The explosives were found outside the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican National Committees. Though they failed to explode, the bombs consisted of threaded galvanized pipes, kitchen timers, and homemade black powder, and were viable explosives.

This breakthrough comes in a probe that had stumped investigators for years. The FBI had recently upped the ante with a $500,000 reward for tips leading to the suspect’s capture, while sharing fresh surveillance video with the public. The clips depicted the individual setting down a backpack on South Capitol Street and subsequently placing the bombs at the DNC and RNC sites.

According to reports, the arrest stemmed not from fresh leads but from a fresh look at evidence gathered back in 2021 and 2022. Sources in law enforcement indicate that the FBI could face criticism for missing earlier opportunities to apprehend the suspect by linking clues more promptly.

On January 6, 2021, the FBI teamed up with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to address the discovery of the bombs immediately. The probe into the pipe bomb scheme ranks among the FBI’s most sweeping ever, encompassing subpoenas for retail records and traces of credit card buys tied to components for the devices.

This story is developing…

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. Institute of Peace Renamed After President Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Institute of Peace has been rebranded as the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, the former U.S. Institute of Peace, and the former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named after a President who ended eight wars in less than a year, will stand as a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability.” – White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly

🎯IMPACT: The renaming comes amid a legal and political battle over the institute’s control and purpose.

IN FULL

The sign on the exterior of the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) building in Washington, D.C., now reads “Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.” The renaming occurs amid a protracted legal and political dispute over control of the peace-building institution.

“Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named after a President who ended eight wars in less than a year, will stand as a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.

USIP, founded by Congress in 1984 as a notionally non-partisan, independent nonprofit tasked with conflict resolution, mediation, research, and diplomacy, was taken over in March 2025 by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a White House-linked agency created under an executive order aimed at shrinking federal bureaucracy, which has since been abolished. Under DOGE’s control, USIP’s board was dismissed, its president ousted, and nearly all of its headquarters staff, some 200–300 employees, were fired. The complaint filed by USIP described the takeover as a “literal trespass and takeover by force.”

Attorney George Foote, who represents USIP and its leadership, expressed anger at the move by the administration to rename the institution, complaining, “Renaming the USIP building adds insult to injury. A federal judge has already ruled that the government’s armed takeover was illegal.”

In May 2025, controversial federal judge Beryl A. Howell ruled that DOGE’s takeover was illegal. The judge declared all actions, removal of board members, termination of staff, reallocation of assets and property, “null and void,” and ordered reinstatement of the former leadership, including acting president George Moose.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New York Times’ Own Lawsuit Says It Is Envious of The National Pulse.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The New York Times filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of War on Thursday, seeking to overturn several provisions of the Pentagon’s updated media policy that resulted in the revocation of a number of corporate news outlets’ media credentials.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The New York Times, The National Pulse and its Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam, the Department of War, and other media organizations.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on Thursday, December 4, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Among that group are… Raheem Kassam, editor-in-chief of the National Pulse, who described his publication as ‘basically an industry mag/site for MAGA world.'” — The New York Times lawsuit

🎯IMPACT: Ultimately, The New York Times is asking a federal court to order the reinstatement of its credentials and membership in the Pentagon press corps.

IN FULL

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of War on Thursday, seeking to overturn several provisions of the Pentagon‘s updated media policy that resulted in the revocation of a number of corporate news outlets’ media credentials. In the filing, The New York Times unwittingly acknowledges the newspaper’s leadership is envious of The National Pulse and other independent news organizations that were, for the first time, credentialed as members of the Pentagon press corps.

“While Plaintiffs and many other journalists and news organizations no longer possess PFACs because they refused to accede to a Policy that would restrict independent reporting, the Department has welcomed what it calls the ‘next generation of the Pentagon press corps, ‘” The New York Times‘s filing states, continuing: “Among that group are… Raheem Kassam, editor in chief of the National Pulse, who described his publication as ‘basically an industry mag/site for MAGA world.'”

The newspaper further alleges that the Pentagon is engaging in First Amendment bias by credentialing independent media outlets instead of itself and other corporate news companies. “In welcoming what she called the ‘official new members of the Pentagon Press Corps,’ Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson (‘Wilson’) specifically focused on the Department’s preference for their First Amendment activities,” the lawsuit claims, arguing: “She criticized journalists and news organizations, like Plaintiffs, who had previously held PFACs, calling them ‘propagandists’ who ‘stopped telling the truth,’ and she praised those the Department had selected to cover the Pentagon, asserting that they ‘actually reach Americans, ask real questions, and don’t pursue a biased agenda.'”

Ultimately, The New York Times is asking a federal court to order the reinstatement of its credentials and membership in the Pentagon press corps. In late September, the Pentagon undertook a major shake-up of its press corps aimed at cracking down on leaks of classified information and the malicious publication of national security secrets. This included issuing a renewed Pentagon media policy designed to prevent media presence in sensitive national security areas and limit access to Pentagon officials without approval from the Department of War.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Gunman at Large After Deadly Shooting at DC Area Casino.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A gunman opened fire inside the MGM National Harbor Casino and Resort in Maryland, killing one man in a targeted shooting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: An unidentified suspect and a victim in his twenties. Prince George’s County Police are investigating.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The shooting occurred on Wednesday, just before noon, in the MGM food court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “MGM is safe. The harbor is safe. This was a targeted incident,” said Prince George’s County Police Chief George Nader.

🎯IMPACT: MGM remains open aside from the food court, and police are continuing their investigation.

IN FULL

Police are hunting for a gunman who was captured on surveillance video firing shots inside the MGM National Harbor Casino and Resort in Maryland on Wednesday, killing one man in what police are calling a targeted attack.

The shooting happened shortly before noon in the casino’s food court, Prince George’s County Police Chief George Nader said. The gunman walked in, seemed to know exactly where the victim was, and walked straight up to him before opening fire.

When police arrived, they found a man in his twenties shot dead. Surveillance video showed no conversation or interaction between the two—the victim was simply ordering food when he was gunned down. Chief Nader said, “It appeared the suspect was looking for this person.”The shooter escaped in a vehicle. No one else was hurt. Police have not yet released a suspect description or possible motive.

Chief Nader stressed that the casino and surrounding area remain safe, saying, “MGM is safe. The harbor is safe. This was a targeted incident. We believe that it would have unfolded anywhere once these two individuals came into the same area.”

The food court is closed while the rest of the resort has reopened. Nearby schools were briefly placed on lockdown as a precaution.

Nader said that violent crime in the county is down about 32 percent this year, insisting, “It’s rare that instances like this occur. We’re confident that we’ll close this case.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.