Corey Lizette Burke, 33, is in custody at King County Jail on first-degree murder charges. According to Seattlepolice, Burke admits to killing her father, Timothy Burke, at their home in south Seattle, Washington. Police reports state that officers found her at the scene, soaked in blood and expressing satisfaction over the slaying, which she described as an “act of liberation.”
Court documents say that on the evening of Election Day, November 5, Burke allegedly killed her 67-year-old father using an ice pick. Her actions included strangling, biting, and repeatedly striking him with the weapon. Burke, a lesbian program manager at Jeff Bezos‘s Blue Origin, is married to Samantha Leigh Allen, the transgender editor of the LGBT magazine Them.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Public records indicate that Burke cited distress over President-elect Donald J. Trump‘s projected victory over Vice President Kamala Harris as a factor in her actions. A disagreement with her father over turning off the lights reportedly escalated the confrontation.
Upon police arrival, Burke allegedly expressed happiness and was seen clapping inside the home, with blood visible on her face. She surrendered to the authorities without resistance. During an interrogation, she reportedly whispered a confession to an officer.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Over a dozen Democrat officials were arrested during a protest at a New York City immigration holding facility.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: City Comptroller Brad Lander, state lawmakers, local advocates, and federal agents.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, New York City.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Another day, another sanctuary politician pulling a stunt in an attempt to get their 15 minutes of fame while endangering DHS personnel and detainees.” – Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The arrests highlight ongoing tensions between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and pro-illegal immigrant Democrats.
IN FULL
Over a dozen Democrat officials were arrested on Thursday while protesting and attempting to gain entry at an illegal immigrant holding facility in New York City. The protest came after a federal judge extended a court order requiring better treatment of detainees. Among the 77 people detained at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan were city Comptroller Brad Lander (D) and several state lawmakers. Eleven officials were arrested inside the building while attempting to enter the 10th floor under the auspices of inspecting holding rooms.
The arrested officials claim they sought to determine if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was complying with a preliminary injunction issued Wednesday. The injunction requires ICE to limit capacity, maintain cleanliness, and provide detainees with basic necessities. Federal agents, however, barred access to the holding rooms and arrested the officials during a sit-in. The building was later locked down due to a bomb threat.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized Comptroller Lander, stating, “Another day, another sanctuary politician pulling a stunt in an attempt to get their 15 minutes of fame while endangering DHS personnel and detainees.”
Lander, who was previously arrested at the facility in June, denied the allegations and accused ICE of failing to comply with federal court orders. State Senator Jabari Brisport (D) described the conditions as “disgusting and cowardly” and accused officials of blocking visibility into the holding areas.
Outside the building, dozens of protesters, including open borders advocates and liberal faith leaders, were also arrested. Protesters carried signs opposing ICE and criticized the agency for alleged inhumane treatment. U.S. District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan’s injunction requires ICE to provide detainees with adequate space, hygiene products, and confidential legal communication. The injunction follows complaints from detainees about unsanitary conditions and inedible food.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: British police confronted an American woman who supports President Donald J. over comments she made online, sparking accusations of a crackdown on free speech.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Cancer patient Deborah Anderson and Thames Valley Police. The Free Speech Union also intervened.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred in June at Ms. Anderson’s home in Slough, Berkshire.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Are there no houses that have been burgled recently? No rapes, no murders… Why aren’t you out there investigating those?” – Deborah Anderson
🎯IMPACT: The case highlights concerns over free speech in the United Kingdom.
IN FULL
British police are again facing accusations of suppressing free speech after Thames Valley Police visited Deborah Anderson, an American cancer patient and Donald J. Trump supporter, at her home. The visit was prompted by an anonymous complaint about an online post deemed “threatening,” though the officer did not disclose the specific comment in question.
A video of the June encounter, which has gone viral online, shows Ms. Anderson standing firm, refusing to apologise after learning her post had upset someone. “I’m not apologising to anybody, I can tell you that,” she said, urging the officer to prioritise more serious crimes. “Are there no houses that have been burgled recently? No rapes, no murders… Why aren’t you out there investigating those?” she demanded.
Thames Valley Police, which initially threatened to drag Anderson to the police station for a formal interrogation if she did not comply, has closed the case under pressure and claims it is unsure what posts prompted Anderson’s interrogation because it has lost them.
The Free Speech Union (FSU) called the incident “chilling” and suggested that Anderson’s support for President Trump and the MAGA movement may have influenced the complaint. “To make it worse, Deborah is in the midst of cancer treatment, including chemotherapy. She ought to have been convalescing. Instead, she was harassed for her tweets,” the FSU remarked.
President Trump has personally voiced concerns about increasing restrictions on free speech in Britain, saying earlier this month, “Strange things are happening over there, they are cracking down… I’m very surprised to see what’s happening.”
The incident involving Deborah Andeson fuels an ongoing debate about free speech in the UK, heightened by recent cases like the arrest of Irish comedy writer creator Graham Linehan, a critic of trans ideology, and the imprisonment of Lucy Connolly, a social media user who said she would not care if hotels hosting migrants were burned down after a mass stabbing of young girls in Southport by a migration-background teenager.
Notably, the British authorities seem to apply speech restrictions unevenly. For instance, TikTok personality Charlotte Hayes faced no action from the police after celebrating the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk and urging her over 200,000 followers to “kill them all, kill them all.”
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: An American cancer patient and Trump supporter was confronted by British police and told to apologise for her online posts or face an investigation.
Deborah Anderson, a mother of two, was visited at her home in June by an officer from Thames Valley Police. He… pic.twitter.com/CaQZVUScQY
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Tesla has reported three crashes involving its robotaxi fleet to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), but details remain redacted.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tesla’s robotaxi fleet of modified Model Y vehicles and the NHTSA.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Early days of Tesla’s pilot robotaxi service in Austin, Texas.
🎯IMPACT: The crashes raise concerns about the transparency and safety of Tesla’s robotaxi software, which remains unproven for public use.
IN FULL
Tesla is facing renewed scrutiny after it was revealed that the company failed to fully disclose three crashes involving its early robotaxi fleet in Austin, Texas. The incidents were reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), but key details remain redacted, raising transparency concerns.
According to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the crashes occurred when the pilot fleet consisted of only “ten to 20” modified Model Y vehicles, all equipped with safety drivers sitting in the passenger seat. While the company reported just one “minor” injury, the fact that three crashes occurred in such a small fleet has alarmed safety advocates and regulators.
Tesla has since expanded the robotaxi program by about 50 percent and opened the service to the general public in Austin. Safety drivers are now seated behind the wheel instead of in the passenger seat, though the cars still operate using Tesla’s self-driving software. Despite the expansion, Tesla has not provided concrete data to prove the safety of its robotaxi system.
Regulators in the U.S. and abroad have launched investigations into Tesla’s claims and practices. In one case, French authorities accused the company of deceptive marketing over the capabilities of its self-driving features. In the U.S., the NHTSA is reportedly examining footage that shows robotaxis running stop signs and making unsafe turns during their debut in Austin.
The company’s broader self-driving efforts have also come under legal pressure. In August, a Miami jury ordered Tesla to pay $329 million in damages related to a fatal crash involving its Autopilot system. The jury found that Tesla’s technology contributed to the death and that the company failed to provide adequate safety warnings.
Elon Musk has repeatedly promised every year since 2014 that Tesla vehicles would drive themselves without human input “next year.” Most recently, Musk said safety drivers would be removed from robotaxis “by end of year,” though no clear timeline has been provided for when that might actually happen.
Despite the setbacks, Tesla plans to expand its robotaxi service to cities like San Francisco, California. The rollout will still require human safety drivers in the front seat, as the company has yet to secure full autonomous operation permits.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Scientists have found plastic nanoparticles in the edible parts of vegetables for the first time, raising concerns about the implications for the food chain.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Researchers from the University of Plymouth, led by Dr. Nathaniel Clark and Richard Thompson.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This is the first time a study has demonstrated nanoplastic particles could get beyond that barrier, with the potential for them to accumulate within plants and be passed onto anything that consumes them.” – Dr. Nathaniel Clark
🎯IMPACT: The findings highlight the need for further investigation into the prevalence of nanoplastic contamination and its potential effects on human health.
IN FULL
Scientists at the University of Plymouth, England, have discovered plastic nanoparticles inside the edible parts of vegetables, raising new concerns about how deeply plastic pollution has infiltrated the food chain. Researchers found that nanoplastics, some as small as one millionth of a centimetre, can bypass natural root barriers in plants and accumulate in both roots and leaves.
The study involved growing radishes hydroponically in water containing polystyrene nanoparticles. To track the particles, scientists used radiolabelled carbon. Within five days, nearly five percent of the nanoparticles had entered the root system. Of those, around 25 percent remained in the radish root itself, while approximately ten percent entered into the leaves.
Dr. Nathaniel Clark, the study’s lead author, said the findings are unprecedented. “This is the first time a study has demonstrated nanoplastic particles could get beyond that barrier, with the potential for them to accumulate within plants and be passed onto anything that consumes them,” he said. Clark noted that radishes were used as a model, but other crops could likely absorb plastic in similar ways.
Richard Thompson, head of the university’s International Marine Litter Research Unit, said the findings build on earlier research that found microplastics in seafood, salt, and bottled water. “This study provides clear evidence that particles in the environment can accumulate not only in seafood but also in vegetables,” he said.
The study comes as other research has revealed alarming signs of plastic exposure in humans. A 2025 report from researchers in New Mexico detected microplastics in human brain tissue, particularly in the frontal cortex. The particles were small enough to cross the blood-brain barrier, though the health effects remain unknown.
Separately, a 2024 investigation found that people may be consuming more than 1,000 microplastic particles each year through ordinary table salt. All 21 salt brands examined were found to contain various forms of plastic contamination, including fragments, fibers, and pellets.
Another study linked microplastic exposure to increased spread of cancer cells in lab experiments.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A homeless man in Seattle, Washington, accused of kidnapping and raping a five-year-old girl inside a city-funded encampment was released from jail after prosecutors missed the legal deadline to file charges.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Forty-six-year-old Viensavanh (Vieng Savanh) Boutdavong, Seattle police, King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, and residents of Tent City 3.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Incident reported Saturday night at Tent City 3 in Seattle. Boutdavong was released Wednesday night.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If prosecutors could prove a child molestation or rape case or another crime beyond a reasonable doubt today, the case would be filed.” – Casey McNerthney, King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office spokesman.
🎯IMPACT: The case has reignited concerns over public safety and the management of city-funded homeless encampments in Seattle.
IN FULL
A homeless man in Seattle, Viensavanh (Vieng Savanh) Boutdavong, was arrested on Saturday at Tent City 3, a city-funded homeless encampment, after being accused of kidnapping and raping a five-year-old girl. Despite prosecutors arguing there was probable cause to hold him on charges of Rape of a Child in the First Degree and Kidnapping in the First Degree with Sexual Motivation, Boutdavong was released Wednesday night when charges were not filed within the legal deadline.
The arrest followed a 911 call from another resident of Tent City 3, who reported Boutdavong attempting to lure the child into his tent. When police arrived, the child was reunited with her mother but disclosed to officers that she was in pain and had been assaulted. Witnesses and residents corroborated concerns about Boutdavong’s behavior, and police later located him in a tent identified by the victim as the site of the assaults. The child was taken to Seattle Children’s Hospital for a medical evaluation and sexual assault exam.
Casey McNerthney, spokesman for the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, stated, “If prosecutors could prove a child molestation or rape case or another crime beyond a reasonable doubt today, the case would be filed.” He added that prosecutors remain confident in the ongoing investigation by Seattle police and are in contact with the case detective.
Tent City 3, operated by SHARE/WHEEL and supported by the City of Seattle, has been a source of controversy for years, with residents and local institutions raising concerns over safety. In 2024, leaders of the Hoa Mai Vietnamese Bilingual Preschool, located near the encampment, warned of “persistent harassment” and violent crime tied to the site. The preschool eventually hired private security to protect students.
Court records indicate Boutdavong has used multiple aliases and was flagged as “armed and dangerous” in arrest paperwork. While this is the first case involving him since 1999, the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office has not ruled out filing charges as the investigation continues.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Canada has seen a significant increase in asylum claims at its border, with over 5,500 claims filed since July at Quebec’s Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle crossing.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Canadian officials, and asylum seekers entering Canada from the United States.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Since July 2025, primarily at the Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle border crossing in Quebec, Canada.
🎯IMPACT: The rise in asylum claims indicates that illegal immigrants in the U.S. fear being detained and deported under President Donald J. Trump, and are seeking safe harbor in Canada due to its weaker stance on removing illegals.
IN FULL
Canada is reporting a significant surge in asylum claims at the Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle border crossing in Quebec, with more than 5,500 claims filed since July—a 263 percent increase compared to the same period last year, according to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The increase aligns with a sharp escalation in immigration enforcement measures in the United States under the Trump administration.
U.S. authorities have intensified deportation operations, including military-style raids by armed agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These actions have focused on illegal immigrants with criminal records and have led to over 200,000 arrests and 50,000 detentions so far this year.
The administration has also revoked Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 800,000 immigrants from countries such as Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
Canada has also seen a noticeable rise in refugee claims filed by U.S. citizens. In the first half of this year alone, 245 applications were submitted, surpassing the total of 204 filed throughout all of 2024. To qualify for asylum in Canada, claimants must demonstrate that no safe alternatives exist within the United States.
This isn’t the first time Canada has experienced a sudden increase in asylum seekers due to U.S. immigration policy changes. A similar trend occurred in 2017 after the first Trump administration announced it would end TPS for Haitians. That year, over 14,000 individuals, nearly half of them Haitian, entered Canada outside official border crossings during the first nine months alone, many fearing deportation from the United States.
While asylum claims into Canada are rising, illegal border crossings in the opposite direction, from Canada into the United States, have dropped sharply. U.S. Customs and Border Protection data shows that apprehensions in the Swanton Sector, which includes parts of New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire, fell by 95 percent, from 1,109 in March 2024 to just 54 in March 2025. Officials attribute the drop to increased surveillance, fencing, and patrols ordered by the Trump administration as part of a broader clampdown on illegal immigration.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A New Hampshire man, Tristan Anderson, was arrested for allegedly plotting to kill Governor Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) with homemade bombs.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tristan Anderson, Governor Kelly Ayotte, and law enforcement officials in New Hampshire.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Anderson was arrested last month in Pembroke, New Hampshire.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re aware of what’s going on nationally. We’re going to remain vigilant.” — Chris Vetter, Director of Safety Services.
🎯IMPACT: Anderson appeared to be motivated by anti-Semitic conspiracies, though why he targeted Ayotte—who is Catholic—is unclear.
IN FULL
Tristan Anderson, a 22-year-old New Hampshire resident, has been arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Governor Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) using homemade bombs. The arrest followed threats he reportedly made to his roommate via Snapchat, where he also expressed anti-Semitic views and criticized the “Israel Deep State.”
According to an arrest warrant, Anderson’s roommate informed police about the 22-year-old’s alleged plan and described items he possessed, such as fireworks, metal tubes, nuts, and bolts believed to be intended for pipe bombs. Law enforcement arrested Anderson last month, and he is currently being held without bail at the Merrimack County Jail.
Social media accounts tied to Anderson reveal an individual with erratic views and prone to violent outbursts. In one post, he said he was “convinced my generation is full of whores.” In another post, Anderson appears more inclined toward violence, writing, “So we fs have to kill all these committees that think they speak for the rest of [New Hampshire] residents.”
Governor Ayotte, a Republican and a Catholic, had recently expressed concerns about the safety of public officials in light of the assassination of Turning Point USA founder and conservative leader Charlie Kirk. In response, she has directed the New Hampshire legislature to enhance security measures at the State House.
Chris Vetter, Director of Safety Services at the State House, stated, “We’re aware of what’s going on nationally. We’re going to remain vigilant.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Brigitte Macron, the 72-year-old wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, is pursuing a defamation case against American commentator Candace Owens over claims that she was born a man.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Brigitte Macron, Emmanuel Macron, Candace Owens, and the Macrons’ attorney, Tom Clare.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on July 23, 2025, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way… she is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight.” — Tom Clare
🎯IMPACT: The case raises questions about free speech, digital misinformation, and international jurisdiction in U.S. courts.
IN FULL
France’s First Lady, Brigitte Macron, plans to present a Delaware Superior Court with scientific and photographic evidence proving that she is a biological female as part of a defamation lawsuit filed against commentator Candace Owens. Filed in July, the lawsuit comes in response to numerous claims made by Owens that the 72-year-old was born a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux.
Tom Clare, an attorney representing Brigitte Macron and French President Emmanuel Macron, whom Brigitte began dating when he was 15 and she was 39, says the legal team will be submitting “expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature,” and that they will also prove “genetically” that the allegations made by Owens are false. “It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way… she is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight,” he said.
The attorney added that images of Brigitte Macron pregnant and raising her children would also be presented in court.
Meanwhile, Owens has pushed back against the lawsuit, with her legal team arguing that it is a politically motivated attempt to suppress free speech. They described the case as a “baseless defamation suit” and a violation of U.S. constitutional protections for journalists.
The lawsuit, filed in Delaware, accuses Owens of promoting a “campaign of global humiliation” through her podcast and social media posts. Owens had previously stated she would “stake [her] entire professional reputation” on her claims about the French First Lady.
Owens’s legal team has filed motions to dismiss the case, citing jurisdictional and procedural challenges. Under U.S. defamation law, if the person allegedly defamed is considered a public figure, they must demonstrate that the person who made the false statement acted with “actual malice.” This legal standard requires proving that the defamer either knew the statement was false or had a reckless disregard for whether it was true or false.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump revealed efforts to regain control of the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump and the United States government.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced during a press conference in the United Kingdom on Thursday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We are trying to get it back by the way. OK, that could be a little breakingnews,” said Trump.
🎯IMPACT: The potential return of Bagram Air Base could have strategic implications, particularly considering its proximity to China.
IN FULL
During a press conference in the United Kingdom on Thursday, President Donald J. Trump stated that the United States is attempting to “get back” the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The facility, one of the largest airbases in the world, was abandoned as part of the U.S. military’s chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan over four years ago under the former Biden government.
“We are going to keep Bagram, one of the biggest airbases in the world. We gave it for nothing. We are trying to get it back by the way. OK, that could be a little breaking news,” Trump said. He emphasized the strategic importance of the base, noting, “One of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, it’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.”
The remarks highlight the ongoing discussions about the U.S. presence and strategic interests in the region, particularly in light of China‘s growing military capabilities. Bagram Air Base was a key hub during the nearly two-decade-long U.S. military engagement in Afghanistan.
It remains unclear how the U.S. military will reoccupy Bagram—whether it will require force or if President Trump intends to reach an agreement with the Taliban, which currently controls Afghanistan.
The Taliban has repeatedly denied that there is a Chinese military presence at the Bagram airbase, though Chinese interests have sought to establish economic and political influence in Afghanistan following the U.S. withdrawal from the region.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Venezuela launched three days of large-scale military exercises in the Caribbean following U.S. strikes on “narcoterrorist” drug trafficking boats.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, and Venezuela’s Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The exercises began this week on La Orchila island, Venezuela, amid heightened U.S.-Venezuela tensions in the Caribbean.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is an aggression all down the line, it’s a judicial aggression when they criminalise us, a political aggression with their daily threatening statements, a diplomatic aggression and an ongoing aggression of military character,” Maduro said of the U.S. operations against drug traffickers.
🎯IMPACT: The situation has escalated tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, with military actions and rhetoric intensifying on both sides.
IN FULL
Venezuela has launched a three-day military exercise titled “Sovereign Caribbean” in response to President Donald J. Trump’s recent strikes on drug trafficker boats in the region. Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López confirmed the operation involves the deployment of air defense systems, armed drones, and electronic warfare units. The exercises are taking place on La Orchila island, a Venezuelan military base, and feature 12 naval ships, 22 aircraft, and 20 small boats operated by Venezuela’s special maritime militia.
The move comes after U.S. forces carried out strikes on vessels linked to drug trafficking syndicates designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) in the Caribbean. President Trump publicly confirmed a “kinetic” strike on one such boat, saying those on board were transporting illegal narcotics from Venezuela to the United States. “The Strike occurred while these confirmed narcoterrorists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics… headed to the U.S.,” Trump said.
In response, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro condemned the U.S. action and accused Washington of attempting to destabilize his government. Maduro stated, “This isn’t tension. It is an aggression all down the line, it’s a judicial aggression when they criminalise us, a political aggression with their daily threatening statements, a diplomatic aggression, and an ongoing aggression of military character.” He warned that any further attacks could provoke a major confrontation, adding that Venezuela would declare a “republic in arms” if directly targeted.
The United States has labeled Maduro a “narcoterrorist” and placed a $50 million bounty on his capture. Maduro, in turn, accused U.S. forces of intercepting a Venezuelan fishing vessel in the country’s Special Economic Zone and detaining it for several hours, calling the incident an act of aggression.
The rise in tensions also comes amid growing concerns about Venezuelan criminal networks operating internationally. One such group, the Tren de Aragua, a transnational gang that originated in Venezuela’s Tocorón prison, expanded its presence into the United States at scale under former President Joe Biden. U.S. authorities have linked the gang to human trafficking, extortion, drug smuggling, and violent crimes in many American cities.
According to recent reports, federal law enforcement has tracked Tren de Aragua operations in places like Denver, where gang members have been involved in organized criminal activity.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
