An ongoing legal fight in Washington State over whether men are allowed into a women’s nude spa has produced a new, politically correct term for biological males. “People who are not vaginally presenting” was used by an attorney to describe individuals with biological male genitalia—rather than simply recognizing them as a ‘male’ or ‘man.’
Currently before the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the case Olympus Spa v. Armstrong stems from a ruling by the Washington State Human Rights Commission, which found that Haven Wilvich, a man, was unlawfully barred from entering the traditional Korean spa. The spa owners implemented a “female-only policy” as patrons are allowed to enter the spa in the nude, though they did make an accommodation for post-operative transgender ‘females.’ Olympus Spa argues that the rule is “essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers.”
The Ninth Circuit appears split on whether Olympus Spa has the right to bar men from its establishment, with one of the appellate judges likening the policy to a ‘whites-only’ policy. “If you have a law that says ‘white applicants only,’ this is ‘biological women entrance only.’ It seems to me they’re quite parallel there,” Judge M. Margaret McKeown argued during a hearing on Monday. “And you can’t have ‘white people only’ come into my restaurant, and then you say, ‘Well, no, we have a religious, spiritual nature to our restaurant, and when you get there, we serve you special food.’ This seems quite different.”
WATCH:
people who are not vaginally presenting
🤣🤣🤣
Finally men have a new moniker. We’ve been called ‘uterus havers’ and ‘birthing bodies’ so I guess it’s men’s turn now?
Seriously though, once you accept a false axiom into your system you end up in crazy town fairly quickly. pic.twitter.com/oZlRKvoTVn
— WomenAreReal (@WomenAreReals) November 19, 2024
