Thursday, May 29, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Classic ‘Oregon Trail’ Game Set for Big Screen Adventure.

A film adaptation of the iconic computer game The Oregon Trail is currently in development, bringing the educational classic to the big screen. Bill Heinemann, one of the game’s co-creators, reflected on its enduring popularity, acknowledging it has become a cultural touchstone worldwide.

The game, first created in 1971 while Heinemann was at Carleton College, has sold tens of millions of copies and was inducted into the World Video Game Hall of Fame. Its original concept came from Don Rawitsch, who designed a board game for his students to simulate the westward journey of 19th-century settlers. Heinemann recognized the potential to adapt it for computers, then a nascent technology, allowing for unpredictable gameplay outcomes without dice.

Notably, the game is remembered for its various player deaths, including from dysentery and snake bites. Heinemann recalled the surprise element of snake bites, noting that they rarely occurred but could catch players off guard. However, ‘dying of dysentery’ has become a popular cultural meme, likely contributing to the game’s continued vitality.

More than five decades after its creation, Apple is reportedly transforming the game into an action-comedy film. Heinemann expressed astonishment at the enduring interest in The Oregon Trail, viewing the movie as a natural progression of the game’s legacy.

Despite its success, Heinemann, Rawitsch, and co-creator Paul Dillenberger did not profit from the game, handing it over to the Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium soon after its development. Heinemann stated that financial gain was never a motivation; his focus was on the love of teaching and gaming.

Image by innovationtrail.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Data: Corporate DEI Roles Declining Amid Trump Admin Pressure.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A recent study reveals a 13 percent reduction in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) jobs in the U.S., with 2,600 positions eliminated.

👥 Who’s Involved: Revelio Labs conducted the analysis; President Donald J. Trump and his Department of Justice (DOJ) are pushing back against DEI practices.

📍 Where & When: The data covers the growth and now accelerating decline of DEI jobs since 2016.

💬 Key Quote: “I’m hopeful and encouraged that Harmeet will drop the hammer on these companies,” says Will Hild, Executive Director of Consumers’ Research, referring to Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the civil rights division at the DOJ.

⚠️ Impact: While DEI job numbers remain above 2016 levels, they are rapidly falling from their peak. This suggests that Trump’s White House efforts to crack down on discriminatory DEI policies are working and reversing the course of corporate policies.

IN FULL:

A new analysis by Revelio Labs reveals a significant decline in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) roles across the United States, with 2,600 positions eliminated since 2023. This marks a 13 percent reduction, bringing the total number of DEI-related jobs to approximately 17,700 as of January 2025, down from a peak of 20,000 in 2023.

The report highlights a dramatic shift from the rapid growth seen in recent years. Job postings for DEI roles surged by 595 percent in August 2022 compared to 2020. Positions tied to terms like “belonging,” “social impact,” or “culture” are also reportedly in decline.

This comes as major corporations scale back DEI programs and reduce financial support for Pride events, following a crackdown on what the Trump administration has termed illegal DEI practices. President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order in January 2025 aimed at eliminating identity-based employment considerations and restoring merit-based opportunities. Among the corporations to comply, at least in part, are Target, Deloitte, Lockheed Martin, and Verizon.

Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is expected to release further guidance soon, including recommendations for the private sector and a list of ongoing compliance investigations. Additionally, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, led by Harmeet Dhillon, has named investigating race-based employment discrimination as a top priority.

Observers have raised concerns about the potential rebranding of DEI roles within corporate structures. Will Hild, Executive Director of Consumers’ Research, warns, “If they just relabel DEI to be some department of HR, it’s not going to do any good.” Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows that the human resources sector employed 922,000 people in 2024, up from 631,000 in 2016.

The analysis also revealed demographic trends within the DEI workforce. Women comprised more than 71 percent of DEI professionals from 2020 to 2024, compared to 51 percent in other roles. Additionally, Black and Hispanic workers accounted for 33 percent of DEI positions, compared to 21 percent of other roles. “That’s a tacit admission that they were engaging in race- and sex-based discrimination,” Hild commented, adding: “I’m hopeful and encouraged that Harmeet will drop the hammer on these companies.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. to Begin Revoking Visas for Chinese Students.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: President Donald J. Trump’s Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says the Department of State will begin revoking student visas for Chinese nationals studying at American universities.

👥 Who’s Involved: Marco Rubio, Chinese nationals studying in the United States.

📍 Where & When: Visa revocations were announced late Wednesday, May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “The U.S. will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,” Rubio wrote.

⚠️ Impact: The move is aimed at cracking down on political and corporate espionage that is often perpetrated by foreign Chinese students on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

IN FULL:

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced late Wednesday evening that the State Department will begin revoking visas for Chinese students studying at American universities. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Rubio appears to imply that the visa revocations for students with ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will be the priority.

“The U.S. will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,” Rubio wrote.

A Congressional report last October found that CCP espionage efforts in the United States intensified under the former Biden government. Released by the House Homeland Security Committee’s Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence, the report found that “Beijing has continually encroached upon American sovereignty to spy, intimidate, and harass… defectors and American citizens.”

Notably, harassment and both political and corporate espionage activities have been linked to foreign students from China studying in the U.S. in the past. Additionally, lawmakers on Capitol Hill have emphasized the potential national security concerns posed by the number of Chinese nationals studying at American universities.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. Court of International Trade Strikes Down Trump’s Tariffs.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A little-known federal court has blocked President Donald J. Trump’s ability to impose and collect trade tariffs connected to his April 2 “Liberation Day” announcement.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump and a three-judge panel on the United States Court of International Trade.

📍 Where & When: The ruling was handed down late Wednesday on May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” the court order reads.

⚠️ Impact: The ruling effectively ends the trade duties unless the order is set aside by a Federal Circuit court as litigation proceeds.

IN FULL:

The United States Court of International Trade handed down a ruling enjoining President Donald J. Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, which include his reciprocal tariffs—mostly paused—and the 10 percent global tariff. According to the court—which operated as an internal Treasury Department board until being elevated to an Article III federal court by Congress in 1956—President Trump’s national emergency claim exceeds his Article II authority as the chief executive.

An emergency declaration citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) underpins the “Liberation Day” tariffs, which Trump announced on April 2. This declaration cites the need to end the continued flow of fentanyl from China, through Canada and Mexico, into the United States as a national emergency, among other issues.

“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” the court order reads, continuing: “This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the court further finds no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter against the United States. The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.”

“There is no question here of narrowly tailored relief; if the challenged Tariff Orders are unlawful as to Plaintiffs, they are unlawful as to all,” the three-judge panel added.

According to White House sources, the ruling will be swiftly appealed to the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Court Clears Way for Trump’s Russiagate Lawsuit Against Pulitzer Board to Proceed.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A Florida appellate court rejected the Pulitzer Prize Board’s request to pause President Donald J. Trump’s defamation lawsuit against its members on presidential immunity grounds.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump, the Pulitzer Prize Board, Judge Robert Rugg of Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal.

📍 Where & When: Ruling issued in Florida on Wednesday, May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: Judge Rugg wrote, “Respondent [Trump] is in the best position to determine if these proceedings would be a diversion and interfere with the obligations of his office.”

⚠️ Impact: The lawsuit will proceed, with potential discovery of the board’s internal deliberations over controversial Pulitzer awards for debunked Trump-Russia collusion reporting.

IN FULL:

A Florida appellate court has denied the Pulitzer Prize Board’s petition to pause President Donald J. Trump‘s defamation lawsuit against its members, marking a significant step forward in the case. The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s ruling, issued Wednesday by Judge Robert Rugg, dismissed the board’s claim that the proceedings should be halted due to presidential immunity concerns.

The lawsuit stems from the board’s refusal to revoke 2018 Pulitzer Prizes awarded to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their reporting on alleged Trump-Russia collusion during the 2016 election. The narrative has since been widely debunked. While neither media outlet is a defendant in the case, Trump argues that the board’s decision to uphold the awards constitutes defamation.

The Pulitzer board has sought to delay the case and shield its internal deliberations from public scrutiny during the discovery process. In January, the board filed for a protective order in Florida’s Okeechobee County, describing its request as a “garden variety” measure to maintain confidentiality in line with longstanding practices. However, Wednesday’s ruling clears the way for discovery, potentially exposing how the board decided to honor the controversial reporting.

Previously, the board had invoked presidential immunity arguments, claiming that ongoing legal proceedings could interfere with Trump’s official duties. The circuit court rejected this reasoning earlier this year, stating that Trump himself could determine whether the case posed a distraction. Judge Rugg upheld that decision, writing, “Respondent [Trump] is in the best position to determine if these proceedings would be a diversion and interfere with the obligations of his office, or whether his continued participation is consistent with the performance of his official responsibilities.”

The ruling also noted that Trump retains the option to dismiss the case or seek a stay if his presidential obligations change.

The decision represents another legal victory for Trump, as the defamation case will now move forward. The Pulitzer board’s efforts to maintain secrecy over its deliberations now face increased scrutiny, particularly given the widespread discrediting of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU Plans Escalation in Black Sea With Anti-Russian ‘Security Hub.’

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The European Union (EU) wants to establish a “maritime security hub” in the Black Sea region to counter Russia’s “shadow fleet” and protect undersea cables.

👥 Who’s Involved: The European Commission, EU members Romania and Bulgaria, Georgia, Moldova, Turkey, Ukraine, and NATO.

📍 Where & When: Black Sea region; proposal released Wednesday, May 28, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “Turkey can play a constructive role on countering Russia’s shadow fleet,” the European Commission argues.

⚠️ Impact: The hub aims to enhance maritime security, monitor ceasefires, and improve EU relations with Turkey, which are strained despite its status as an official candidate for EU membership.

IN FULL:

The European Union (EU) is proposing the creation of a “maritime security hub” in the Black Sea region to confront Russia and protect critical infrastructure, including undersea cables, according to a European Commission document released Wednesday. Despite the appeal to regional security, the move could be seen as a significant provocation against Russia, whose ongoing invasion of Ukraine is in part aimed at securing greater Black Sea access.

According to the European Commission document, the initiative would focus on enhancing maritime capabilities for “real-time monitoring from space to seabed” and establishing an early warning system for potential threats. The hub, which EU officials suggest could be located in member states Bulgaria or Romania, would also support ceasefire negotiations and monitoring efforts in Ukraine and the broader Black Sea region. The proposal comes amid heightened concerns from Black Sea nations, including EU members Romania and Bulgaria, over Russia.

Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, emphasized the importance of a ceasefire before the hub’s full potential could be realized. “But first, we need to have a ceasefire,” she remarked, referencing a prior U.S.-brokered attempt that failed due to a lack of Russian compliance.

Turkey, which controls maritime traffic through the Bosporus Strait, is identified as a key player in the success of the proposed security measures. The European Commission noted that Ankara could “play a constructive role on countering Russia’s shadow fleet” and contribute to efforts aimed at bolstering maritime safety and energy security. The Russian “shadow fleet” is a collection of aging vessels that the country uses to circumvent oil sanctions imposed by the U.S. and EU.

In recent months, Turkey has indicated its willingness to participate in a future European “reassurance force” for Ukraine, which could include maritime assets to monitor a ceasefire. However, EU-Turkey relations remain fraught, with longstanding disputes involving EU members Greece and Cyprus and Turkey’s accession to the EU being stalled for over a decade.

EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos suggested that the Black Sea strategy could help foster “good neighbourly relations” with Turkey. However, she refrained from addressing the broader issue of Turkey‘s EU membership ambitions.

Image: European Union 2023– Source: EP.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Electric Flying Taxi Hits 150MPH in Landmark Cross-Country Flight.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The United Kingdom’s first electric flying taxi successfully completed a test flight, reaching speeds of up to 150mph.

👥 Who’s Involved: Vertical Aerospace, a Bristol-based company, developed the VX4 prototype; pilot Simon Davies conducted the maiden flight.

📍 Where & When: The flight took place over England’s Cotswolds, departing from Cotswolds Airport.

💬 Key Quote: Pilot Simon Davies said, “The VX4’s smooth performance during this wingborne flight highlights its potential to deliver a quiet, efficient, and comfortable flying experience.”

⚠️ Impact: Flying taxis could reduce travel times significantly, with potential commercial operations starting by 2028 with government support and funding.

IN FULL:

The United Kingdom’s first electric flying taxi has taken to the skies, marking a significant milestone in aviation technology. Vertical Aerospace, a Bristol-based company, successfully tested its VX4 prototype, which carried a pilot and four passengers on its maiden cross-country flight over England’s Cotswolds.

The aircraft, which resembles a traditional small plane but operates with electric propulsion, reached speeds of 150mph during the test. Once fully operational, it is expected to achieve speeds of up to 200mph. The VX4 generates lift through its wings, making it quieter and more energy-efficient than traditional rotor-reliant designs.

Simon Davies, the pilot for the test flight, described the experience as “truly special.” He stated, “Our performance predictions were spot on, and the aircraft handled beautifully. It’s safe, responsive, and a joy to fly. The low noise from the propellers made the cockpit environment pleasant, a testament to the incredible work of our team.”

The successful test highlights the potential for flying taxis to transform travel in the UK. Journeys such as Brighton to Heathrow could take just 20 minutes, compared to over an hour by car. Virgin Atlantic has also announced plans for a flying taxi service, which could reduce travel times between Manchester and Leeds to just 15 minutes.

The British government has committed £20 million (~$27 million) in funding to advance commercial drone and flying taxi technologies. Transport Minister Mike Kane emphasized the importance of this innovation, saying, “This Government wants to see the UK maximise the benefits of future flight technologies, including flying taxis, both for the economy and for communities.”

The Department for Transport (DfT) is collaborating with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to streamline regulations and accelerate the deployment of these technologies. The government’s timeline aims for enhanced drone capabilities by 2027 and flying taxi operations by 2028.

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Vance Addresses Bitcoin 2025: ‘There’s a New Sheriff in Town.’

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Vice President J.D. Vance addressed the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, detailing the Trump administration’s efforts to integrate digital assets into the U.S. economy and reverse Biden-era anti-cryptocurrency regulations.

👥 Who’s Involved: Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, American investors, retirees, and the digital asset and financial industries.

📍 Where & When: Vance’s address occurred on Wednesday, May 28, at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.

💬 Key Quote: “I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.

⚠️ Impact: The Trump administration’s move to roll back anti-crypto regulation could ease the way for the technology’s broader adoption and use in the American economy.

IN FULL:

Vice President J.D. Vance detailed the Trump administration’s aggressive deregulation of cryptocurrencies and associated technologies in an address at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. Speaking before attendees, Vance announced that “there’s a new sheriff in town” before emphasizing that President Donald J. Trump’s America First agenda includes a comprehensive rollback of the former Biden government’s anti-cryptocurrency regulatory actions.

“But as you know, there’s a new sheriff in town, because after four years of mistreatment and outright hostility led by Democrat regulators, lawmakers in this country have a choice,” Vance said in Las Vegas on Wednesday, May 28. He continued: “Will we lead our nation into a future of financial sovereignty, of innovation, and of prosperity? Or will we let unelected bureaucrats and foreign competitors write the rules for us?”

“And I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.

Notably, Vance’s speech coincided with a move by the Trump administration earlier on Wednesday to remove Biden-era regulations barring cryptocurrency as an asset in 401(k) retirement plans—a policy goal pushed for by many in the financial and digital assets industries.

“In our administration, we understand the full potential of the digital assets industry,” Vance said, adding: “Not just as an investment, not just as a flashy technology, but as a symbol and driver of personal liberty for all our citizens.”

Since his inauguration in January, President Trump has enacted a series of significant reforms that have cleared the way for the broader adoption and use of cryptocurrencies in the American economy. In March, Trump announced the establishment of a national Bitcoin reserve with the goal of retaining an estimated 200,000 Bitcoin, mainly sourced through cryptocurrency assets already seized by federal agencies in criminal proceedings.

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Threatens to Deny Visas to UK Government Censors.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration announced a visa ban targeting British officials involved in censoring American citizens, warning that foreign actors who trample free speech rights will no longer be welcome in the United States.

👤Who’s Involved: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, British media regulator Ofcom, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley, and Lucy Connolly, a British mother imprisoned for a social media post.

🧾Key Quote: “We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech,” said Rubio.

⚠️Fallout: British officials were blindsided by the announcement and are scrambling for answers from the White House, as pro-censorship authorities face mounting scrutiny from Washington.

📌Significance: The move marks a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s effort to push back against globalist speech controls and defend the First Amendment from foreign interference.

IN FULL:

British government officials involved in censoring American citizens could soon be barred from setting foot in the United States under a sweeping new measure from the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the visa restrictions on Wednesday, directly targeting foreign bureaucrats and regulators deemed “complicit in censoring” Americans online.

The policy appears to be aimed at Ofcom, the British government media regulator responsible for enforcing the controversial Online Safety Act—a law that critics say enables sweeping censorship and punishes American tech companies with massive fines. Under the legislation, platforms that fail to remove so-called “harmful content” face penalties of up to £18 million (~$24.4 million) or 10 percent of annual revenue, placing U.S.-based firms in the crosshairs of British law.

“For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights,” Rubio said. “It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil.”

The Trump administration has taken particular offense at the British government’s attempts to impose extra-territorial censorship, with Rubio adding: “It is… unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.”

The announcement reportedly caught British officials off guard, with diplomats urgently seeking clarity from Washington. The warning comes just days after it was reported that the White House is actively “monitoring” the case of Lucy Connolly, a British mother sentenced to 31 months in prison for a social media post about a mass stabbing targeting young girls in Southport, England, perpetrated by the son of two African asylum seekers.

That case drew international concern after British officials threatened to prosecute or extradite Americans who violated their hate speech laws online. “We will throw the full force of the law at people,” warned Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the time. “Whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

In response, U.S. State Department officials from the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor traveled to London in March. The diplomats reportedly met with pro-life activists—imprisoned for as little as silently praying inside their heads near abortionist clinics under laws restricting freedom of expression and religion.

The Vice President has taken a personal interest in censorship in Britain and Europe more broadly, warning during a speech in Germany, “In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Cops Cleared After Tazing, Macing Wheelchair-Bound 92-Year-Old in Nursing Home.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Two Sussex Police officers were found not guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm in the case of a 92-year-old disabled man who was pepper-sprayed, hit with a baton, and tasered at an English nursing home.

👥 Who’s Involved: Police Constable (PC) Stephen Smith, PC Rachel Comotto, Donald Burgess (now-deceased 92-year-old amputee and dementia patient), care home staff, and Burgess’s family.

📍 Where & When: Park Beck care home, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, England, June 2022.

💬 Key Quote: “The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection,” Judge Christopher Hehir explained to jurors.

⚠️ Impact: Burgess died three weeks after the incident, having contracted an illness in the hospital. Sussex Police referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), and the incident led to public outcry.

IN FULL:

Two police officers from Sussex, England, have been cleared of assault charges following an incident involving a 92-year-old man at a nursing home in St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex. Police Constable (PC) Stephen Smith and PC Rachel Comotto were found not guilty at Southwark Crown Court of assault occasioning actual bodily harm after using force on Donald Burgess, a dementia patient and amputee.

The incident occurred in June 2022 after police responded to an emergency call reporting that Burgess, a one-legged man confined to a wheelchair, had brandished a butter knife and threatened nursing home staff. According to court testimony, Burgess was pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton, and tasered during the encounter, which the officers escalated within moments of their arrival. He was sent to the hospital and passed away three weeks later after contracting an illness there.

The court heard that Burgess’s actions were “out of character” and later attributed to delirium caused by a urinary tract infection. Deputy nursing home manager Donna Gardner described his movements with the butter knife as “extremely quick.” Judge Christopher Hehir told the jury, “The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection.”

Following the incident, Sussex Police referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which led to an investigation and subsequent charges against the officers.

Burgess’s family expressed their shock and horror over his death. A neighbor from his former home in Battle, East Sussex, described him as a “lovely, sociable man” who had faced significant health challenges, including diabetes and the amputation of his leg. After his wife’s passing, Burgess, who suffered from dementia, moved into the nursing home.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.