A Christian former school employee in Gloucestershire, England, has successfully appealed her dismissal over social media posts criticizing LGBT relationship teaching. In a recent judgment, a panel comprised of Lord Justice Underhill, Lord Justice Bean, and Lady Justice Falk ruled in favor of Kristie Higgs, who was terminated from Farmor’s School in 2019. Higgs had shared posts on social media expressing concerns over the ‘No Outsiders In Our School’ program, which educates primary school students on the Equality Act. Her comments included references to “brainwashing our children” regarding the teaching’s focus on gender fluidity and same-sex marriage.
Higgs was initially dismissed for gross misconduct following an anonymous complaint suggesting her views could harm the school’s reputation. However, the latest courtruling found an initial decision to remand the case to an employment tribunal was “unlawfully discriminatory.”
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
“In the present case the claimant, who was employed in a secondary school, had posted messages, mostly quoted from other sources, objecting to Government policy on sex education in primary schools because of its promotion of ‘gender fluidity’ and its equation of same-sex marriage with marriage between a man and a woman,” noted Lord Justice Underhill.
“It was not in dispute… that the claimant’s beliefs that gender is binary and that same-sex marriage cannot be equated with marriage between a man and a woman are protected by the Equality Act,” he added.
He described how the school had justified Higgs’s firing “on the basis that the posts in question were intemperately expressed and included insulting references to the promoters of gender fluidity and ‘the LGBT crowd,'” but said this was not sufficient cause, given there was no evidence she had expressed her beliefs at school or discriminated against any of her students.
The ruling comes as President Donald J. Trump is instructing Attorney General Pam Bondi to root out “anti-Christian bias” in the U.S.
❓What Happened: Federal authorities charged 27 individuals associated with the Tren de Aragua gang and splinter group Anti-Tren with racketeering. They are accused of engaging in criminal activities such as murder plots, extortion, and sex trafficking in New York City.
👥 Who’s Involved: The indictment includes alleged members Jarwin Valero-Calderon, Samuel Gonzalez Castro, Eferson Morillo-Gomez, and Anderson Smith Zambrano-Pacheco, among others.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The indictments were announced in Manhattan federal court on Monday. The criminal acts reportedly took place in areas such as the Bronx and Prospect Avenue, with incidents dating back several months.
💬 Key Quote: Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch referred to Tren de Aragua as “one of the most dangerous gangs in the country” and praised the law enforcement efforts to dismantle their operations in New York City.
⚠️ Impact: Those charged face potential life sentences under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, previously utilized to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the Mafia.
IN FULL:
Federal authorities have filed racketeering charges against 27 suspected members of a gang network linked to Tren de Aragua and rival splinter group Anti-Tren. These charges represent the first instance of the U.S. government employing the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act—a tool used in past organized crime cases such as those against Mafia families—to target the group, with the Trump administration pushing a much more robust line against migrant crime than the former Biden-Harris government.
The indictment involves allegations of murder plots, extortion, and the sex trafficking of young women in the New York City area. The alleged criminal activities reportedly occurred over several months in locations such as the Bronx, including a notable incident at a Prospect Avenue apartment. According to court documents, members like Jarwin Valero-Calderon and Anderson Smith Zambrano-Pacheco were involved in threats and acts of violence to maintain control over these areas.
The indictment details a specific event where suspects Samuel Gonzalez Castro and Eferson Morillo-Gomez allegedly threatened attendees of a party near the Bronx apartment with violence, underscoring the level of intimidation exercised by the gang.
Authorities also claim that young women trafficked into the United States by these gangs were subjected to serious harm or threats should they attempt to escape. This element of the case highlights grave concerns regarding human trafficking related to the group’s activities.
The charges carry potentially severe penalties. If convicted, the accused face sentences of up to life imprisonment.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Harvard University has initiated legal action against the Trump administration after a $2.2 billion grant freeze following the university’s refusal to adhere to certain conditions set by the White House.
👥 Who’s Involved: Participants include Harvard University, represented by its president, Alan M. Garber, and the Trump administration.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Cambridge, Massachusetts, with developments since last week’s White House announcement.
💬 Key Quote: “The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” said Alan M. Garber, Harvard’s president.
⚠️ Impact: The freeze could significantly affect research, according to Harvard.
IN FULL:
Harvard University has filed a lawsuit in response to the Trump administration’s decision to suspend $2.2 billion in grants following the university’s rejection of White House demands. The Ivy League institution in Cambridge, Massachusetts, accuses the administration of overreaching, challenging its independence, and attempting to influence academic decisions by requiring it to screen foreign students for extremist views.
The conflict arose after Harvard opted not to implement measures required by the administration, which included vetting foreign students for anti-Semitism and hostility toward American values, and shutting down diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. These conditions were closely linked to allegations of ideological bias and the university’s purported failure to safeguard Jewish students on campus. In response, President Alan M. Garber argued that the demands interfere with academic freedom and decision-making.
The situation escalated when the White House announced the freeze, suggesting that Harvard was not meeting the necessary conditions for receiving taxpayer money. “Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege,” remarked Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman.
Garber claims that the funding halt could jeopardize research initiatives, including studies on serious diseases like pediatric cancer, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. He argued in court documents that the administration has not established any meaningful link between anti-Semitism concerns and the research projects put on hold—failing to take responsibility for the funding freeze by refusing the administration’s conditions.
The lawsuit comes amid a broader review by the administration into universities’ handling of anti-Semitism and other forms of extremism, with at least 60 institutions under scrutiny.
❓What Happened: Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to announce a plan to eliminate petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the U.S. food supply.
👥 Who’s Involved: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The announcement will be made on Tuesday, as stated in an HHS press release.
💬 Key Quote: “Kennedy said he wants eight commonly used food dyes phased out by the end of 2026.”
⚠️ Impact: The plan, if implemented, would remove several synthetic dyes from a wide range of food products, impacting manufacturers and possibly altering product formulations.
IN FULL:
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is poised to unveil a new initiative to remove petroleum-based synthetic dyes from food products across the United States. The announcement is scheduled for Tuesday, accompanied by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.
This action seeks to phase out eight synthetic dyes frequently utilized in popular items such as sodas, candies, and cereals. Notably, the FDA approved 36 such dyes, including Red No. 3, Blue No. 1, and Green No. 3. These ingredients are widespread in the food industry due to their vibrant colors.
The proposal aligns with ongoing scrutiny of food dyes. Some studies previously associated Red Dye No. 3 with various health concerns. The dye was finally banned ahead of RFK Jr.’s confirmation hearings.
States like Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, and West Virginia have already taken steps to eliminate such dyes from school cafeterias, showcasing a trend towards limiting artificial coloring in foods that children frequently consume.
According to reports, Kennedy’s strategy intends to phase out eight of these synthetic dyes by the end of 2026. Such a move could prompt significant changes in food manufacturing processes, requiring companies to reformulate products with natural colorings.
❓What Happened: The Justice Department has called on a federal judge to require Google to surrender control over its Chrome web browser due to antitrust concerns.
👥 Who’s Involved: Key figures include Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater, Justice Department official David Dahlquist, and U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The remarks were made in court on Monday; the proceedings occurred in the United States.
💬 Key Quote: “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.” — Deputy Attorney General Blanche.
⚠️ Impact: Potentially significant changes in control of Google’s Chrome web browser and broader implications for competition within the global search market.
IN FULL:
In a significant development in antitrust proceedings against Google, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) urged a district judge on Monday to compel Google to divest ownership of the Chrome web browser. The call comes as part of ongoing efforts to address Google’s dominant role in the global search market. Some allege the dominance is maintained through illegal agreements that hinder competition and negatively affect consumers and advertisers.
In court, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche cited Google’s monopolistic practices, emphasizing the company’s extensive influence over online data and alleged political bias through its search engine operations. Deputy Attorney General Blanche told U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, “As a monopolist, Google uses its market power against the American people.”
He argued that Google’s control stems largely from its nearly $20 billion annual payment to Apple, securing Google’s search engine as the default on Apple’s Safari browser. This payment was highlighted during a trial last year focusing on liability.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has previously recognized Google’s monopolistic behaviors. Mehta is now tasked with assessing the remedy phase of this case. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Gail Slater highlighted the bipartisan nature of the case. Slater noted the involvement of 49 states alongside federal authorities in challenging Google’s competitive practices.
DOJ official David Dahlquist referred to the current situation as a pivotal moment for restoring market competition. The Trump DOJ’s stance reflects a continued commitment to ensuring monopolistic behaviors do not compromise competition in the digital market.
❓ What Happened: Col. Ricky Buria, a former aide to Biden-era Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, has resigned from the Marine Corps and is reportedly transitioning into a senior civilian role under Trump-world Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, with consideration for the coveted chief of staff position. Buria, a recent Democrat donor, is the source of major concerns in Trump world.
👤 Who Was Involved: Ricky Buria, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, outgoing Chief of Staff Joe Kasper, former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Democratic congressional candidate Mike O’Brien, and former DoD official Anne Powers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
🧾 Key Quote: “Ricky was only the [Senior Military Assistant] because he was the only guy standing,” a defense official toldDefense News.
⚠️ Fallout: Officials inside the Department of Defense and the White House have raised concerns about Buria’s close ties to the previous administration.
📌 Significance: The personnel move highlights unresolved tensions surrounding staffing and loyalty inside the Pentagon’s top ranks.
IN FULL:
Col. Ricky Buria, a former junior military assistant (JMA) to Lloyd Austin, is reportedly in line for a senior civilian advisory position under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to multiple defense officials. Buria began terminal leave from the Marine Corps last week and is even under consideration for the role of chief of staff following the departure of Joe Kasper, according to numerous sources familiar with the matter.
But Buria was first appointed to the Pentagon in April 2024 under the Biden government. After Hegseth’s confirmation, Buria remained in place–a “holdover”–while other senior staff were dismissed. He temporarily filled the position of acting senior military assistant (SMA).
“Ricky was only the SMA because he was the only guy standing,” an official toldDefense News.
In recent months, Buria has accompanied Hegseth on official travel and participated in high-level meetings. On a recent trip to Panama, Buria was present for discussions with the Panamanian government regarding canal access. He also joined a bilateral meeting in Washington with El Salvador’s Minister of Defense, seated two chairs away from the secretary.
Buria, far left, with Hegseth in Panama.
Multiple officials say Buria has taken on expanded responsibilities beyond those typical of a junior military assistant, including personnel input and attendance at foreign policy briefings.
Additionally, campaign finance data uncovered by The National Pulse shows that Buria made a donation in 2023 via ActBlue to Democrat Mike O’Brien, a former Marine and candidate in Pennsylvania’s 10th Congressional District. O’Brien was endorsed by VoteVets–a left-wing group that claims President Trump “hates veterans,” and has attempted to destabilize his Department of Defense using the now-infamous “Signal group chat” story as a cudgel. The group even publicly called for Hegseth to be fired.
Buria has maintained relationships with former Biden-era Pentagon staffers. In a LinkedIn comment, former Department of Defense official Anne Powers publicly referred to Buria as her “partner in crime,” while he heaped praise on others and vice versa.
Buria’s messages to Biden-era staffers on LinkedIn.
The White House personnel office is reviewing Buria’s transition to civilian service. Approval is required for senior advisory appointments.
Buria was promoted to colonel in fall 2024. Under standard requirements, officers must serve two years at a given rank to retire at that grade. Without a waiver, he is expected to retire as a lieutenant colonel.
Four top officials have departed Hegseth’s team in recent days. The staffing turnover has left a gap in senior leadership, which Buria is currently helping fill, much to the chagrin of many across the Trump administration.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Celebrity chef Marco Pierre White praised Nigel Farage and endorsed the Reform Party’s candidate for West of England Mayor, Arron Banks, ahead of May’s municipal elections.
👥 Who’s Involved: Marco Pierre White, celebrity chef; Nigel Farage, Reform Party leader; Sir Keir Starmer, British Prime Minister; Arron Banks, Reform’s West of England mayoral candidate.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: White spoke to ITV West Country at Old Down Manor near Bristol, England, owned by Arron Banks.
💬 Key Quote: “I thought [Farage] was a very impressive individual, really impressive.” — Marco Pierre White.
⚠️ Impact: White’s high-profile endorsement could boost Reform’s momentum as polls show growing support, while his criticism of Labour’s ethics and policies may further erode public trust in Starmer’s government.
IN FULL:
Celebrity chef and restaurateur Marco Pierre White has thrown his weight behind Nigel Farage and his Reform Party, delivering a blistering critique of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party. Speaking at Old Down Manor near Bristol—owned by Reform’s West of England mayoral candidate Arron Banks, a businessman and the driving force behind the Leave.EU campaign during the Brexit referendum—White praised Farage as a “really impressive, clever, [and] thoughtful.”
White, who met Farage recently, said he thought the Brexiteer “was a very impressive individual, really impressive.”
“He has done his apprenticeship, hasn’t he? He has served his time in the field,” he remarked, referring to Farage’s decades of campaigning in the European Parliament, media, and now the House of Commons since 1999. “I can see why the polls are showing what they’re showing,” he added, referring to surveys showing Reform tying and often beating Labour and the formerly governing Conservatives by increasingly convincing margins.
Describing himself as a “true socialist” but disillusioned with establishment parties, White had sharp words for Starmer, caught in a “freebie” scandal shortly after he gained the British premiership. “As Prime Minister of the UK, the last thing you should be doing is accepting freebies, or any of your party,” White said.
The chef was referring a scandal involving Lord Alli, a Labour donor elevated to the House of Lords under former Prime Minister Tony Blair, gifting £20,000 in work clothes and over £2,000 in eyeglasses to Starmer, with thousands more being lavished on clothes for Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and the Labour leader’s wife, Victoria.
White also sounded the alarm on Labour’s economic policies. “My world is the restaurant world, the hotel world, hospitality,” he said. “It’s tough. Restaurants are going bust every week; hotels are struggling. If you look at the pubs, they’re closing down.”
White blamed rising costs—minimum wage increases, higher National Insurance, utilities, and food prices—for “crippling” the sector.
💬 Key Quote: “We’re not doing anything over at Justice Department. I don’t see investigations, I don’t see indictments,” said Bannon.
⚠️ Impact: Bannon’s comments reflect dissatisfaction among some Trump supporters and a call for more action from the DOJ.
IN FULL:
WarRoom host Stephen K. Bannon has voiced his dissatisfaction with the Department of Justice (DOJ), warning that the Deep State currently holds the upper hand in government. During a conversation with Jack Posobiec on Monday, Bannon emphasized the lack of visible progress in the DOJ’s investigations and indictments: “We’re not doing anything over at Justice Department. I don’t see investigations, I don’t see indictments,” he said, expressing concern that the Pam Bondi-led department is about to be diverted into investigating leaks around America First Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
“If the guys around Hegseth, if there’s indictments or investigations going on, and there’s no indictments, and there’s no release of the Epstein Files, and there’s no investigations of Brennan and the 51, and you’re not spending your time on that, but somehow gets diverted over this, it is going to be a firestorm from the MAGA base,” Bannon said, referring to anti-Trump former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan and the 51 intelligence officials who penned a letter downplaying the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation ahead of the 2020 election.
“There has been no movement from the Justice Department,” Bannon stated. “[N]ow they’re talking about… some investigation of the guys around Hegseth… you haven’t done your primary job, which is to take down the Deep State.”
“People, we are burning daylight!” he stressed. “These people are playing smashmouth, they’re playing hardball, and the Deep State is winning right now!”
❓What Happened: Suspected militants fired on a group of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, resulting in multiple fatalities and injuries.
👥 Who’s Involved: At least 20 tourists killed, several more injured. Security officials believe multiple gunmen were involved.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The incident occurred on Tuesday in Pahalgam, a popular tourist location in South Kashmir.
💬 Key Quote: “Usha and I extend our condolences to the victims of the devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India.” — Vice President J.D. Vance.
⚠️ Impact: Tourist activity, which had been recovering, is likely to be affected. Security operations are underway to apprehend the militants involved.
IN FULL:
On Tuesday, a lethal attack was carried out by suspected militants targeting tourists in the Pahalgam region of Indian-controlled Kashmir. Between 20 and 24 people were killed, with several others sustaining injuries, according to various reports, although an official death toll had not been released as of the time of publication. Pahalgam, known for its scenic meadows and glaciers, attracts substantial tourist numbers yearly.
Two senior police officials, who wished to remain unnamed, confirmed to the Associated Press that at least 20 deceased have been located and that around three dozen individuals were injured, many critically. The assailants reportedly targeted a gathering of tourists at close proximity, sparking chaos. A joint military, paramilitary, and police search effort is underway to locate those responsible.
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, whose in-laws are Indian, is currently in India, laying the groundwork for a trade deal between the United States and the Hindu-majority nation.
“Usha and I extend our condolences to the victims of the devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India,” he said of the attack in a statement on social media. “Over the past few days, we have been overcome with the beauty of this country and its people. Our thoughts and prayers are with them as they mourn this horrific attack.”
“The United States stands strong with India against Terrorism,” said President Donald J. Trump in his own statement. “We pray for the souls of those lost, and for the recovery of the injured. Prime Minister Modi, and the incredible people of India, have our full support and deepest sympathies. Our hearts are with you all!”
Kashmir is divided between India and Pakistan, with Indian Kashmir regularly subjected to terror attacks by Islamist separatists. Nine Hindu pilgrims were killed and over 30 injured when a bus crashed into a gorge in a suspected militant attack in 2024, and at least 44 people were killed when a suicide bomber from a Pakistan-based Islamist group crashed into a bus carrying Indian paramilitary police in 2019, among many other incidents.
❓What Happened: A significant decrease in illegal crossings at the U.S.-Canada border has been reported.
👥 Who’s Involved: United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), CBP Chief Patrol Agent Robert Garcia, Tricia McLaughlin of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Trump administration officials.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The Swanton Sector of the northern U.S. border, which includes parts of New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire, in March 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “There is now a clear message: You cannot come into the U.S. without consequence.” — Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin.
⚠️ Impact: Enforcement measures have led to a significant drop in unlawful entries and a noticeable decline in border-related crimes.
IN FULL:
According to recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) findings, the northern U.S.-Canada border has seen a massive decline in illegal entries. The Swanton Sector, stretching over parts of New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire, documented just 54 illegal alien apprehensions in March 2025. This figure represents a drastic 95 percent decrease compared to March 2024, which saw 1,109 crossings.
Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Tricia McLaughlin, noted that under the Biden-Harris regime, the Swanton Sector reported over 1,400 illegal crossings in April 2024 alone. McLaughlin criticized Biden-era policies, arguing they enabled criminal activities, including smuggling.
Border agents have noted a similar positive trend at the southern border, with March 2025 data reflecting a 94 percent decline in illegal crossings compared to the same month in 2024.
The improvement is not attributed to enhanced border patrols alone, but also to a change in communication strategies and resources. “There is now a clear message: You cannot come into the US without consequence,” McLaughlin said, referencing stricter penalties for criminal activities tied to illegal immigration.
Challenges remain, particularly concerning sanctuary city policies, where cooperation with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations varies by jurisdiction. In some states, these policies inhibit operations, creating areas perceived as safe havens for illegal aliens, some of whom are involved in serious crimes.
Notably, the reduction along the Canadian border also comes after President Trump pressured the Canadian authorities into doing more on border security earlier this year to delay tariffs on Canadian goods.
❓What Happened: A Minnesota fiscal policy analyst admitted vandalizing six Teslas, causing around $21,000 in damages. He will not face criminal charges, as the local county attorney has decided to pursue pre-charge diversion instead.
👥 Who’s Involved: Dylan Bryan Adams, a fiscal policy analyst for Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s Department of Human Services, is involved. The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office and the Minneapolis Police Department are also key players.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The vandalism took place in the Minneapolis area. The county attorney’s decision was made public in April 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “Our main priorities are to secure restitution for the victims and hold Mr. Adams accountable.” — Daniel Borgertpoepping, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office spokesman.
⚠️ Impact: The decision not to bring criminal charges has sparked frustration among Minneapolis police and potential discontent among victims.
IN FULL:
A fiscal policy analyst for Governor Tim Walz’s administration in Minnesota, who was connected to vandalizing six Teslas in the Minneapolis area, causing an estimated $21,000 in damages, will not face criminal charges. Instead, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office will pursue a pre-charge diversion plan. Dylan Bryan Adams, identified as a fiscal policy analyst, was observed on video engaging in the alleged crimes.
County Attorney Mary Moriarty determined Adams will not face charges. As part of the diversion program, Adams must adhere to conditions that could include community service and restitution payments.
“Our main priorities are to secure restitution for the victims and hold Mr. Adams accountable,” Hennepin County Attorney’s Office spokesman Daniel Borgertpoepping claimed.
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said that frustration over the charge decision should be directed at the county attorney. He said investigators invested considerable work into the case, with hopes of charges being filed.
The Minnesota Department of Human Services is reviewing the matter. The agency said that employees of Governor Walz’s administration are required to uphold ethical standards. So far, the specific repercussions Adams could face in his professional capacity, if any, remain unspecified.
The arrest of Adams comes amid a nationwide campaign to vandalize Tesla vehicles and properties across the United States, due to Tesla owner Elon Musk’s role in the Trump administration. Some extremists even published the addresses and personal information of all American Tesla owners in a bid to intimidate them into getting rid of their vehicles.
President Donald J. Trump has promised to crack down on those destroying Tesla vehicles and property. The President has even floated the idea of sending offenders to El Salvador.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
