Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan (D) faced a mixed verdict in his high-profile corruption trial this week. Madigan, a Democrat who previously led the Illinois House for over three decades, was convicted on 10 counts, acquitted of seven, and jurors could not reach a decision on six other charges. The trial, centered on bribery and racketeering accusations, came after more than ten days of jury deliberation.
The case against Madigan, dubbed the “Velvet Hammer” for his influential yet low-key leadership style, relied heavily on secret recordings by a former Chicago alderman turned Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informant. In a surprising move, Madigan took the stand, denying all allegations.
Madigan’s charges were rooted in a 23-count indictment accusing him of using his political influence to pass legislation benefiting utility companies in exchange for kickbacks and favors. Federal prosecutors presented various forms of evidence, including recordings and transcripts, to illustrate Madigan’s activities, which reportedly involved blurred lines between his political and legal endeavors as an attorney.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Julia Schwartz described Madigan’s actions during the trial’s closing arguments as an abuse of his substantial power. The trial featured testimony from over 60 witnesses, showcasing Madigan’s operations, which often occurred in meetings held at his downtown law office.
Madigan, who retired from politics in 2021 ahead of his indictment, is said to have manipulated legislative maps and directed campaign funds throughout his tenure. Significantly, the trial also involved Michael McClain, Madigan’s close confidant and former state legislator. However, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the charges against McClain.
