Sunday, May 4, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Putin Declares Temporary Ceasefire in Ukraine.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a three-day ceasefire in Ukraine next month for “humanitarian reasons.”

👥 Who’s Involved: Vladimir Putin, Donald J. Trump, and Volodymyr Zelensky.

📍 Where & When: Ukraine, a pause in hostilities starting May 8 for 72 hours.

💬 Key Quote: “Maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently,” President Trump remarked.

⚠️ Impact: Continued uncertainty over the potential effectiveness of the ceasefire and its influence on U.S.-backed truce efforts.

IN FULL:

On April 28, the Kremlin announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin has called for a three-day pause in hostilities in Ukraine next month. This decision marks the second instance in two weeks that Russia has promised a temporary cessation of its military operations. The ceasefire is set to begin on May 8 and last for 72 hours, coinciding with the May 9 celebrations in Russia commemorating the Soviet victory over Germany in World War II.

The announcement follows increased international pressure, particularly from U.S. President Donald J. Trump, who has been vocal in his demands for Russia to pause its military activities in Ukraine. In a recent social media post, President Trump emphatically appealed to President Putin to “STOP!” the bombardment.

“Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Let’s get the Peace Deal DONE!” President Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Trump has expressed skepticism about Putin’s intentions towards peace, questioning if the Russian leader is earnestly pursuing a resolution or merely stalling. In discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over the weekend, Trump openly questioned whether Putin genuinely wants to end the hostilities. Writing on Truth, the President speculated, “Maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently, through ‘Banking’ or ‘Secondary Sanctions?'”

Ukraine has not yet publicly responded to the news of the planned ceasefire. Previously, Russia declined to agree to a 30-day unconditional ceasefire, despite Ukraine’s acceptance of such terms. An earlier one-day truce declared by Putin to observe Easter failed to hold, though it reportedly led to a temporary reduction in violence.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Make Movies in America!’ — Trump Seeks 100% Tariffs on Movies Produced Overseas.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The U.S. movie industry is facing rapid decline as other countries attract filmmakers with incentives.

👥 Who’s Involved: The U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Trade Representative, and foreign nations offering incentives.

📍 Where & When: Hollywood and other U.S. film locations; current developments.

💬 Key Quote: “WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!”

⚠️ Impact: Potential 100% tariff on foreign-produced films entering the U.S. as a response to protect domestic film production.

IN FULL:

The American film industry is experiencing a swift downturn as international competitors entice filmmakers and studios with lucrative incentives, drawing them away from the United States, President Trump has asserted in a new Truth Social post.

“The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated. This is a concerted effort by other Nations and, therefore, a National Security threat. It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda! Therefore, I am authorizing the Department of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, to immediately begin the process of instituting a 100% Tariff on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands. WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!”

The trend of movie making abroad has left Hollywood and other key film-producing areas in the U.S. grappling with significant challenges. The situation is  seen by Trump as a strategic move by foreign nations, which poses a national security concern due to its implications for messaging and propaganda.

The Department of Commerce, alongside the United States Trade Representative, has now been tasked with initiating a process to impose a 100% tariff on all films produced outside the country that are imported into the U.S. This move aims to counteract the foreign allure and reinvigorate domestic film production.

Trump’s call to action is clear: “WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!” This sentiment underscores the urgency of protecting and revitalizing the American film industry, ensuring that it remains a competitive and influential force globally.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

MS-13 Illegals Stab Supermax Prison Guards in Premeditated Attack.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Three officers at Wallens Ridge State Prison were stabbed during an altercation.

👥 Who’s Involved: Five MS-13 gang members from El Salvador were implicated, all of whom are illegal immigrants with violent criminal records.

📍 Where & When: The incident occurred on Friday at Wallens Ridge State Prison in Virginia.

⚠️ Impact: The safety and security of correctional facilities are under scrutiny, with investigations underway to determine the circumstances and prevent future incidents.

IN FULL:

Three correctional officers at Wallens Ridge State Prison in Virginia were stabbed on Friday in a premeditated attack. According to the Virginia Department of Corrections, the alleged perpetrators were five individuals associated with the MS-13 gang. These individuals, originating from El Salvador, are illegal immigrants previously convicted of violent crimes.

The incident has prompted an investigation by the Virginia Department of Corrections. Details about the severity of the injuries sustained by the officers and the specific circumstances leading to the confrontation have not been disclosed at this time.

The membership of the MS-13 gang by those implicated adds a layer of complexity, given the gang’s notoriety for violent criminal activity and its origins in Central America. Investigators are currently examining how the assault unfolded and assessing measures to bolster safety for staff and inmates alike.

“Five of the individuals responsible for this senseless attack should never have been in this country in the first place,” said Virginia DOC Director Chad Dotson in a statement.

“Every single day, our officers put their lives on the line to ensure public safety for the more than 8.8 million people across the Commonwealth,” Dotson said. “This attack is an example of the dangers they face when they show up to work every day. Our officers are heroes, and I commend the team at Wallens Ridge for their swift response.

The prison is located in south west Virginia, near both the Kentucky and Tennessee borders.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Fired Waltz After Iran Bomb Conspiracy With Netanyahu – REPORT.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: President Donald Trump dismissed his national security adviser, Mike Waltz, after reports emerged that Waltz conspired with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Iran.

👥 Who’s Involved: Donald Trump, Mike Waltz, Benjamin Netanyahu, Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

📍 Where & When: White House, United States, dismissal announced on May 3, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “Waltz wanted to take US policy in a direction Trump wasn’t comfortable with because the US hadn’t attempted a diplomatic solution.”

⚠️ Impact: Waltz’s dismissal led to his reassignment as the ambassador to the United Nations, prompting an administrative reshuffle within Trump’s team.

IN FULL:

President Donald Trump dismissed Mike Waltz from the position of national security adviser amid alleged conspiracies involving Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Waltz, who previously served as head of the National Security Council, allegedly coordinated military strategies with Netanyahu during a February meeting, stirring significant controversy in the administration.

Reports emerged suggesting that Trump was displeased with Waltz’s apparent alliance with Netanyahu on military moves against Iran. A source indicated Waltz “shared the Israeli leader’s conviction” regarding Iran strikes, diverging from Trump’s preference for diplomatic routes.

Waltz’s exit follows previous controversies, including a messaging mishap known as “Signalgate,” in which a top globalist editor was added to a chat about a military operation against Yemen’s Houthi group. This added to the discomfort surrounding Waltz’s position, although the White House has not explicitly commented on either incident.

This shift sees former Green Beret Waltz now positioned as ambassador to the United Nations, described by some Trump insiders as a “downgrade.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio temporarily assumes Waltz’s responsibilities within the National Security Council.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New Aborted Landings at Reagan National Due to Army Helicopter Interference.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is examining two aborted landings at Reagan National Airport. The incidents involved commercial flights being redirected due to the proximity of a US Army Black Hawk helicopter headed towards the nearby Pentagon.

👥 Who’s Involved: The parties involved include the NTSB, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), US Army, Delta Flight 1671, Republic Flight 5825, Senator Maria Cantwell, and Senator Ted Cruz.

📍 Where & When: The events occurred around 2:30 PM ET on Thursday near Reagan National Airport and the Pentagon.

💬 Key Quote: “The United States Army remains committed to aviation safety and conducting flight operations within all approved guidelines and procedures,” said US Army spokesman Capt. Victoria Goldfedib.

⚠️ Impact: The proximity of military and passenger flights has raised safety concerns, spurred political reactions, and could lead to legislative changes. The recent events underline ongoing air safety challenges.

IN FULL:

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has launched an investigation into two new near misses involving commercial flights at Reagan National Airport. On Thursday, flights were directed to abort landings due to a nearby US Army Black Hawk helicopter headed for the Pentagon. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that air traffic controllers instructed Delta Flight 1671 and Republic Flight 5825 to perform go-arounds at an altitude of 2:30 p.m. ET to avoid any conflict as the helicopter was inbound to the Pentagon Army Heliport.

This incident comes in the wake of heightened scrutiny on helicopter operations near the airport following a January midair collision. In that incident, an Army helicopter collided with American Airlines Flight 5342, resulting in 67 fatalities.

US Army spokesperson Capt. Victoria Goldfedib stated the Black Hawk was following directives from Pentagon Air Traffic Control for a ‘go-around,’ avoiding any potential overlap in airspace with the commercial aircraft. The Army has reiterated its commitment to adhering to all aviation safety guidelines.

Political figures have reacted strongly. Senator Maria Cantwell highlighted the proximity and recurrence of such incidents, urging agencies to prioritize air safety. Senator Ted Cruz expressed intentions to pursue legislative measures to control Army helicopter proximity to commercial air routes, advocating for increased FAA oversight.

A preliminary FAA report indicated that the helicopter took a longer path around the Pentagon rather than a direct route to the helipad. This raised concerns about protocol adherence. The Pentagon may consider alternative ground transport solutions to mitigate risks.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ to Settle With Ashli Babbitt’s Family in $30M Capitol Assassination Suit.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: The Department of Justice has reached an agreement in principle to settle a lawsuit filed by Ashli Babbitt’s family over her shooting during the January 6 Capitol riot.

👥 Who’s Involved: Ashli Babbitt’s family, U.S. Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd, and federal Judge Ana Reyes.

📍 Where & When: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Friday hearing; lawsuit filed in January 2024.

💬 Key Quote: Robert Sticht, lawyer for Babbitt’s family, noted a formal settlement agreement is anticipated within the next three weeks.

⚠️ Impact: The tentative settlement concludes the legal pursuit of $30 million over Babbitt’s death, while President Donald Trump publicly supports the family’s stance and calls for “justice.”

IN FULL:

The Department of Justice has reached an initial settlement with the family of Ashli Babbitt, days after a federal judge recounted the proceedings. The family filed a $30 million lawsuit against the government over Babbitt’s shooting death during the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Details of the settlement remain undisclosed following the hearing in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, adjudicated by Judge Ana Reyes. Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd shot Babbitt at point-blank range as rioters breached a window leading to the House Speaker’s Lobby. The National Pulse was one of the first to declare the killing an extrajudicial, unnecessary assassination on federal property. Babbitt posed no physical threat to Byrd, who has a record of unprofessional and politically motivated behavior.

At the time, even so-called ‘conservative’ figures like CPAC’s Matt Schlapp, mistaking Babbit for “a 16-year-old,” said she may have “deserved” to be shot:

Babbitt’s family initiated legal action in January 2024, asserting her shooting was unjust. As an emergency hearing revealed the settlement was considered, the family’s prior legal representative sought a preliminary injunction to secure his payment.

Counsel for Babbitt’s family, Robert Sticht, conveyed expectations for the formal settlement signing within a few weeks.

Former President Donald Trump, who has shown continued support for those involved in the Capitol events, expressed his commitment to investigating the legal proceedings further. Meanwhile, the court agreement represents a conclusion to the family’s claims.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
farage

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Victorious Farage Declares: We’re The Opposition Now.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, made substantial gains in local UK elections, claiming to have replaced the Conservatives as the main opposition to Labour.

👥 Who’s Involved: Nigel Farage, Sir Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch, local UK politicians, and voters.

💬 Key Quote: “The party that I lead is expanding. As we march on, the Conservatives are in retreat. In my opinion, they will never recover,” said Nigel Farage.

⚠️ Impact: The rise of Reform UK promises a shift in political dynamics, pressuring the Conservative and Labour parties to adapt strategies.

IN FULL:

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has gained control of 10 councils and over 600 seats across England. Farage asserted that the two-party political framework is collapsing locally and nationally. He visited Newton Aycliffe, County Durham, to celebrate his party’s victories. The Reform leader stressed that the Conservative Party is retreating and is unlikely to recover. These election outcomes have put Sir Keir Starmer, Labour leader, and Kemi Badenoch, a Conservative Party leader, under scrutiny to reverse their parties’ setbacks.

“We’ve dug very deep into the Labour vote and, in other parts of England, we’ve dug deep into the Conservative vote. After tonight, there’s no question, in most of the country, we are now the main opposition party to this government,” Farage declared.

Writing for the Telegraph, Farage added:

“The party that I lead is expanding. As we march on, the Conservatives are in retreat. In my opinion, they will never recover.

“There is now a widespread acceptance that Reform UK has supplanted the Conservatives as the real opposition to Labour in England, Scotland and Wales. We no longer have to rely only on opinion polls to indicate this; Thursday’s results prove it.

“Many people will wonder how the strange death of the Conservative Party came about. In fact, there is no mystery.

“The 80-seat majority that was achieved under Boris Johnson’s leadership in 2019 should have led to a golden period for the party, including the delivery of a proper Brexit. For their own selfish reasons, they squandered their position, in the process betraying the electorate in the most unforgivable way. To compound matters, mass immigration – the issue about which most voters feel strongly – was allowed to rocket.”

In response, Sir Keir Starmer is anticipated to propose stricter immigration measures soon. This, however, comes amidst regional frustrations over the government’s policies, as expressed by South Yorkshire mayor Oliver Coppard and others seeking immediate action.

Prime Ministerial hopeful Farage now intends to stop the housing of asylum seekers in the counties under his party’s control. Furthermore, the prospects of deporting all illegal immigrants within five years are being explored, contingent on withdrawing from European agreements.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
australia ballot box

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Here’s What Happened in Australia’s Election.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese secured a second term in Australia’s national election, defeating the conservative opposition.

👥 Who’s Involved: Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister of Australia, and Peter Dutton, leader of the conservative opposition.

💬 Key Quote: “The Australian people have voted for Australian values. For fairness, aspiration and opportunity for all.” – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

⚠️ Impact: The election outcome signifies continued leadership under leftist Albanese, with the center-right Liberal Party led by Peter Dutton preparing to rebuild after the defeat.

IN FULL:

Leftist Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been elected for a second term in office following Australia’s recent national election. Albanese emerged victorious, defeating the center-right opposition headed by Peter Dutton. In his victory speech, Albanese emphasized leftist, multiculturalist doctrine.

“We do not need to beg or borrow or copy from anywhere else. We do not seek our inspiration overseas. We find it right here in our values and in our people,” he said, in what many have interpreted as a veiled jab at the United States.

Peter Dutton, leader of the Liberal Party, acknowledged the party’s failure to achieve desired results. Dutton took responsibility for the campaign’s shortcomings and recognized the hard work of his party members throughout the past three years. He also expressed regret for those candidates who lost their seats and ambitions in the election. Despite the setback, Dutton assured supporters that the party remains strong and committed to rebuilding.

Core themes during the campaign included the cost of living, foreign policy, housing, and energy. Australia’s politics have drifted leftward for decades, and the nation was one of the most oppressive and antediluvian during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Labor Party increased its representation in the House of Representatives, though final vote tallies will take weeks to ascertain due to the nation’s slow-paced system. Voting is compulsory in Australia, with a turnout of around 98.2 percent. All Australian citizens aged 18 and over are legally required to enrol and vote in federal, state, and local elections. Failure to vote without a valid and sufficient reason can result in a fine.

There are no voter identification requirements.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Dolly Parton Hits Ric Grenell’s Resurgent Kennedy Center.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: A musical performance centered on Dolly Parton’s work is scheduled at The Kennedy Center. The National Pulse readers can get five percent off tickets using the code THREADS at checkout. This is not paid advertising, and we do not make a commission from ticket sales.

👥 Who’s Involved: Dolly Parton, The Kennedy Center, Richard Grenell, National Symphony Orchestra, President Trump.

📍 Where & When: The Kennedy Center, Washington, D.C.; June 26 and 27.

⚠️ Impact: Despite protests over recent administrative changes under President Trump’s leadership, the venue attracts high-profile artists and substantial audiences.

IN FULL:

“Dolly Parton’s Threads: My Songs in Symphony” is set to take the stage at The Kennedy Center, featuring the National Symphony Orchestra. The concert, debuting June 26 and 27, marks the first time the iconic musician’s work will be presented in a symphonic format in Washington, D.C.

Dolly Parton highlighted the personal significance of the event, saying in an announcement that the project weaves together the threads of her life through her songs. The showcase will include beloved hits such as Jolene, Coat of Many Colors, and I Will Always Love You, bringing decades of her work to orchestral life.

The announcement represents a significant development for The Kennedy Center, which has been a focal point in the arts community following recent institutional reforms. The firing of the entire board and subsequent policy changes during President Trump’s term amplify the importance of drawing recognized artists like Parton to the venue.

The Kennedy Center continues to see record-breaking attendance figures. In March, the venue noted an event attendance of 11,000 individuals, marking the highest recorded participation for a public gathering.

The National Pulse readers can get five percent off tickets using the code THREADS at checkout. This is not paid advertising, and we do not make a commission from ticket sales.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Regulators Accuse TikTok of Secretly Sending User Data to China.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: TikTok faces a $599 million fine for illegal data transfers to China.

👥 Who’s Involved: TikTok, Irish Data Protection Commission, President Donald J. Trump.

📍 Where & When: Ireland; alleged violations occurred between 2020 and 2022.

💬 Key Quote: “TikTok failed to verify, guarantee and demonstrate that the personal data of [European] users… was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,” said Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle.

⚠️ Impact: TikTok must align its data practices with EU standards within six months or halt data transfers to China. Plans for an appeal have been stated.

IN FULL:

Irish regulators have imposed a substantial fine on TikTok, the Beijing-owned video platform, requiring the company to pay $599 million. This penalty arises after it was discovered that TikTok unlawfully sent user data from Europe to China, breaching data protection laws of the European Union (EU), according to the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC).

Following a four-year investigation, the DPC concluded that TikTok had not implemented adequate safeguards when transferring European users’ data to China. Additionally, between 2020 and 2022, the platform did not disclose to its users that their data could be accessed by personnel in China.

“TikTok failed to verify, guarantee and demonstrate that the personal data of [European] users, remotely accessed by staff in China, was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,” DPC deputy commissioner Graham Doyle said.

This fine coincides with enduring scrutiny of TikTok’s connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). U.S. officials have raised national security concerns over TikTok and mandated that the app sever ties with its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, by June 19, or it risks an outright ban in the U.S.

Despite TikTok’s persistent denials regarding the storage of European or American data on Chinese servers, the company admitted in April to having stored limited data from European users in China. The revelations prompted serious concerns from Irish regulators about further regulatory actions that might be necessary.

The fine constitutes the third-largest fine under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulators have instructed TikTok to bring its data handling practices into compliance with EU standards within six months, or it will be required to suspend all data transfers to China.

In response, TikTok has stated its strong disagreement with the Irish commission’s findings and its intentions to appeal the decision.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump White House Unveils Lean 2026 Budget Proposal.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) presented President Donald J. Trump’s discretionary budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 to Congress. Notably, the Trump White House touts the plan as being a “skinny budget,” with significant cuts being proposed for a bevy of agencies and federal programs.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump, U.S. Congress, and Russ Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

📍 Where & When: The budget plan was presented to Congress in Washington, D.C., on Friday, May 2.

💬 Key Quote: OMB Director Russ Vought stated, “At this critical moment, we need a historic Budget—one that ends the funding of our decline, puts Americans first, and delivers unprecedented support to our military and homeland security.”

⚠️ Impact: The budget suggests a major restructuring of federal funding, with significant cuts to non-defense programs and increases in defense and homeland security spending, aiming to redirect resources to support national security and infrastructure.

IN FULL:

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) sent President Donald J. Trump’s discretionary budget proposal for the 2026 fiscal year to Congress on Friday, with the push for steep spending cuts rankling some Republican lawmakers at the Capitol. The proposal calls for a $163 billion reduction in non-defense discretionary spending compared to the previous year, with a focus on increasing funding for the military and border security.

President Trump’s OMB Director, Russ Vought, pitched the budget plan to lawmakers and the American public, stating: “At this critical moment, we need a historic Budget—one that ends the funding of our decline, puts Americans first, and delivers unprecedented support to our military and homeland security.” Notably, the proposals seek to codify many of the spending cuts enacted by the American First leader through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), making it more difficult for Democrats to restore the programs if they were to win the White House in 2028.

While many House Republicans have cheered the DOGE cuts and signaled their support for the budget plan, some influential Republican lawmakers chairing key committees appear less than enthused with the proposed spending cuts. “Look, we’re supportive of this administration and what it’s trying to do,” Representative Tom Cole (R-OK), who chairs the powerful House Appropriations Committee, said on Friday. He added: “But with all due respect to anybody, I think the members have a better understanding of what can pass and what can’t than the Executive Branch does.”

Historically, budgets proposed by the President and sent to Congress undergo significant changes on Capitol Hill. The plan has and does, however, serve as a guide for lawmakers as to what the White House sees as policy priorities. Additionally, many of the non-defense discretionary spending cuts come through eliminating grants and other federal programs that have largely funded the Democratic Party’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) agenda.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.