The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is offering free flights and a $1,000 stipend to illegal aliens who voluntarily leave the U.S. — a self-deportation program the agency says costs far less than traditional deportation.
The details: The program requires illegal aliens to register for self-deportation through the CBP Home App, and they only receive their stipend once it is verified that they have returned to their home country.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
President Trump told the press: “We’re gonna get them a beautiful flight back to where they came from.”
Cost savings: DHS says it currently costs the American taxpayer over $17,000 to arrest, detain, and deport a single illegal alien. Under this new, self-deportation program, it costs around $4,500—a 70 percent savings.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller added on X: “The savings are as much as $1 million per illegal alien family given the long-term costs of free welfare and public support.”
What the left is saying: Pro-illegal groups are denouncing the plan and urging illegals to reject the offer. One activist, Aaron Reichlin, said: “This option might be WORSE… it would abandon clear options for staying.”
Zoom out: The plan is reminiscent of Trump’s effort to reduce the federal workforce by offering buyouts to government workers who voluntarily resigned, ultimately leading to 77,000 resignations. Pay a little up-front for long-term savings.
The last word goes to President Trump, who warned that those who do not take this offer “are going to be taken out of our country… And they will never get a path to come back in.”
❓What Happened: The European Union (EU) wants to establish a “maritime security hub” in the Black Sea region to counter Russia’s “shadow fleet” and protect undersea cables.
👥 Who’s Involved: The European Commission, EU members Romania and Bulgaria, Georgia, Moldova, Turkey, Ukraine, and NATO.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Black Sea region; proposal released Wednesday, May 28, 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “Turkey can play a constructive role on countering Russia’s shadow fleet,” the European Commission argues.
⚠️ Impact: The hub aims to enhance maritime security, monitor ceasefires, and improve EU relations with Turkey, which are strained despite its status as an official candidate for EU membership.
IN FULL:
The European Union (EU) is proposing the creation of a “maritime security hub” in the Black Sea region to confront Russia and protect critical infrastructure, including undersea cables, according to a European Commission document released Wednesday. Despite the appeal to regional security, the move could be seen as a significant provocation against Russia, whose ongoing invasion of Ukraine is in part aimed at securing greater Black Sea access.
According to the European Commission document, the initiative would focus on enhancing maritime capabilities for “real-time monitoring from space to seabed” and establishing an early warning system for potential threats. The hub, which EU officials suggest could be located in member states Bulgaria or Romania, would also support ceasefire negotiations and monitoring efforts in Ukraine and the broader Black Sea region. The proposal comes amid heightened concerns from Black Sea nations, including EU members Romania and Bulgaria, over Russia.
Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, emphasized the importance of a ceasefire before the hub’s full potential could be realized. “But first, we need to have a ceasefire,” she remarked, referencing a prior U.S.-brokered attempt that failed due to a lack of Russian compliance.
Turkey, which controls maritime traffic through the Bosporus Strait, is identified as a key player in the success of the proposed security measures. The European Commission noted that Ankara could “play a constructive role on countering Russia’s shadow fleet” and contribute to efforts aimed at bolstering maritime safety and energy security. The Russian “shadow fleet” is a collection of aging vessels that the country uses to circumvent oil sanctions imposed by the U.S. and EU.
In recent months, Turkey has indicated its willingness to participate in a future European “reassurance force” for Ukraine, which could include maritime assets to monitor a ceasefire. However, EU-Turkey relations remain fraught, with longstanding disputes involving EU members Greece and Cyprus and Turkey’s accession to the EU being stalled for over a decade.
EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos suggested that the Black Sea strategy could help foster “good neighbourly relations” with Turkey. However, she refrained from addressing the broader issue of Turkey‘s EU membership ambitions.
❓What Happened: The United Kingdom’s first electric flying taxi successfully completed a test flight, reaching speeds of up to 150mph.
👥 Who’s Involved: Vertical Aerospace, a Bristol-based company, developed the VX4 prototype; pilot Simon Davies conducted the maiden flight.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The flight took place over England’s Cotswolds, departing from Cotswolds Airport.
💬 Key Quote: Pilot Simon Davies said, “The VX4’s smooth performance during this wingborne flight highlights its potential to deliver a quiet, efficient, and comfortable flying experience.”
⚠️ Impact: Flying taxis could reduce travel times significantly, with potential commercial operations starting by 2028 with government support and funding.
IN FULL:
The United Kingdom’s first electric flying taxi has taken to the skies, marking a significant milestone in aviation technology. Vertical Aerospace, a Bristol-based company, successfully tested its VX4 prototype, which carried a pilot and four passengers on its maiden cross-country flight over England’s Cotswolds.
The aircraft, which resembles a traditional small plane but operates with electric propulsion, reached speeds of 150mph during the test. Once fully operational, it is expected to achieve speeds of up to 200mph. The VX4 generates lift through its wings, making it quieter and more energy-efficient than traditional rotor-reliant designs.
Simon Davies, the pilot for the test flight, described the experience as “truly special.” He stated, “Our performance predictions were spot on, and the aircraft handled beautifully. It’s safe, responsive, and a joy to fly. The low noise from the propellers made the cockpit environment pleasant, a testament to the incredible work of our team.”
The successful test highlights the potential for flying taxis to transform travel in the UK. Journeys such as Brighton to Heathrow could take just 20 minutes, compared to over an hour by car. Virgin Atlantic has also announced plans for a flying taxi service, which could reduce travel times between Manchester and Leeds to just 15 minutes.
The British government has committed £20 million (~$27 million) in funding to advance commercial drone and flying taxi technologies. Transport Minister Mike Kane emphasized the importance of this innovation, saying, “This Government wants to see the UK maximise the benefits of future flight technologies, including flying taxis, both for the economy and for communities.”
The Department for Transport (DfT) is collaborating with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to streamline regulations and accelerate the deployment of these technologies. The government’s timeline aims for enhanced drone capabilities by 2027 and flying taxi operations by 2028.
WATCH:
Higher, faster, further.
Last Thursday, our piloted VX4 prototype conducted its first wingborne flight — taking to the skies like a conventional aircraft, soaring over the UK countryside under real-world conditions.
❓What Happened: Vice President J.D. Vance addressed the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, detailing the Trump administration’s efforts to integrate digital assets into the U.S. economy and reverse Biden-era anti-cryptocurrency regulations.
👥 Who’s Involved: Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, American investors, retirees, and the digital asset and financial industries.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Vance’s address occurred on Wednesday, May 28, at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.
💬 Key Quote: “I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.
⚠️ Impact: The Trump administration’s move to roll back anti-crypto regulation could ease the way for the technology’s broader adoption and use in the American economy.
IN FULL:
Vice President J.D. Vance detailed the Trump administration’s aggressive deregulation of cryptocurrencies and associated technologies in an address at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. Speaking before attendees, Vance announced that “there’s a new sheriff in town” before emphasizing that President Donald J. Trump’s America First agenda includes a comprehensive rollback of the former Biden government’s anti-cryptocurrency regulatory actions.
“But as you know, there’s a new sheriff in town, because after four years of mistreatment and outright hostility led by Democrat regulators, lawmakers in this country have a choice,” Vance said in Las Vegas on Wednesday, May 28. He continued: “Will we lead our nation into a future of financial sovereignty, of innovation, and of prosperity? Or will we let unelected bureaucrats and foreign competitors write the rules for us?”
“And I’m here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House,” the Vice President declared.
Notably, Vance’s speech coincided with a move by the Trump administration earlier on Wednesday to remove Biden-era regulations barring cryptocurrency as an asset in 401(k) retirement plans—a policy goal pushed for by many in the financial and digital assets industries.
“In our administration, we understand the full potential of the digital assets industry,” Vance said, adding: “Not just as an investment, not just as a flashy technology, but as a symbol and driver of personal liberty for all our citizens.”
Since his inauguration in January, President Trump has enacted a series of significant reforms that have cleared the way for the broader adoption and use of cryptocurrencies in the American economy. In March, Trump announced the establishment of a national Bitcoin reserve with the goal of retaining an estimated 200,000 Bitcoin, mainly sourced through cryptocurrency assets already seized by federal agencies in criminal proceedings.
WATCH:
After four years of mistreatment and outright hostility from Democrat regulators, there’s a new sheriff in town.
With President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House. pic.twitter.com/WJPJJFUESX
❓What Happened: The Trump administration announced a visa ban targeting British officials involved in censoring American citizens, warning that foreign actors who trample free speech rights will no longer be welcome in the United States.
👤Who’s Involved: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, British media regulator Ofcom, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley, and Lucy Connolly, a British mother imprisoned for a social media post.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
🧾Key Quote: “We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech,” said Rubio.
⚠️Fallout: British officials were blindsided by the announcement and are scrambling for answers from the White House, as pro-censorship authorities face mounting scrutiny from Washington.
📌Significance: The move marks a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s effort to push back against globalist speech controls and defend the First Amendment from foreign interference.
IN FULL:
British government officials involved in censoring American citizens could soon be barred from setting foot in the United States under a sweeping new measure from the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the visa restrictions on Wednesday, directly targeting foreign bureaucrats and regulators deemed “complicit in censoring” Americans online.
The policy appears to be aimed at Ofcom, the British government media regulator responsible for enforcing the controversial Online Safety Act—a law that critics say enables sweeping censorship and punishes American tech companies with massive fines. Under the legislation, platforms that fail to remove so-called “harmful content” face penalties of up to £18 million (~$24.4 million) or 10 percent of annual revenue, placing U.S.-based firms in the crosshairs of British law.
“For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights,” Rubio said. “It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil.”
The Trump administration has taken particular offense at the British government’s attempts to impose extra-territorial censorship, with Rubio adding: “It is… unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.”
The announcement reportedly caught British officials off guard, with diplomats urgently seeking clarity from Washington. The warning comes just days after it was reported that the White House is actively “monitoring” the case of Lucy Connolly, a British mother sentenced to 31 months in prison for a social media post about a mass stabbing targeting young girls in Southport, England, perpetrated by the son of two African asylum seekers.
That case drew international concern after British officials threatened to prosecute or extradite Americans who violated their hate speech laws online. “We will throw the full force of the law at people,” warned Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the time. “Whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”
In response, U.S. State Department officials from the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor traveled to London in March. The diplomats reportedly met with pro-life activists—imprisoned for as little as silently praying inside their heads near abortionist clinics under laws restricting freedom of expression and religion.
The Vice President has taken a personal interest in censorship in Britain and Europe more broadly, warning during a speech in Germany, “In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Two Sussex Police officers were found not guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm in the case of a 92-year-old disabled man who was pepper-sprayed, hit with a baton, and tasered at an English nursing home.
👥 Who’s Involved: Police Constable (PC) Stephen Smith, PC Rachel Comotto, Donald Burgess (now-deceased 92-year-old amputee and dementia patient), care home staff, and Burgess’s family.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Park Beck care home, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, England, June 2022.
💬 Key Quote: “The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection,” Judge Christopher Hehir explained to jurors.
⚠️ Impact: Burgess died three weeks after the incident, having contracted an illness in the hospital. Sussex Police referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), and the incident led to public outcry.
IN FULL:
Two police officers from Sussex, England, have been cleared of assault charges following an incident involving a 92-year-old man at a nursing home in St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex. Police Constable (PC) Stephen Smith and PC Rachel Comotto were found not guilty at Southwark Crown Court of assault occasioning actual bodily harm after using force on Donald Burgess, a dementia patient and amputee.
The incident occurred in June 2022 after police responded to an emergency call reporting that Burgess, a one-legged man confined to a wheelchair, had brandished a butter knife and threatened nursing home staff. According to court testimony, Burgess was pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton, and tasered during the encounter, which the officers escalated within moments of their arrival. He was sent to the hospital and passed away three weeks later after contracting an illness there.
NEW: Bodycam footage released shows UK police tasering Donald Burgess, a 92-year-old man with one leg, after pepper-spraying him in the face.
Infuriating.
To make matters worse, Burgess was hospitalized because of the incident where he contracted Covid and sadly passed 22… pic.twitter.com/mntRF2OuEO
The court heard that Burgess’s actions were “out of character” and later attributed to delirium caused by a urinary tract infection. Deputy nursing home manager Donna Gardner described his movements with the butter knife as “extremely quick.” Judge Christopher Hehir told the jury, “The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection.”
Following the incident, Sussex Police referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which led to an investigation and subsequent charges against the officers.
Burgess’s family expressed their shock and horror over his death. A neighbor from his former home in Battle, East Sussex, described him as a “lovely, sociable man” who had faced significant health challenges, including diabetes and the amputation of his leg. After his wife’s passing, Burgess, who suffered from dementia, moved into the nursing home.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Prosecutors in the United Kingdom have authorised 21 charges against Andrew and Tristan Tate, including rape, actual bodily harm, and human trafficking.
👥 Who’s Involved: Andrew Tate, 38, and Tristan Tate, 36, both British-American citizens and former residents of Luton, England.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Charges authorised by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS); the brothers are currently under investigation in Romania.
💬 Key Quote: “The domestic criminal matters in Romania must be settled first,” said the CPS.
⚠️ Impact: The charges follow evidence submitted by Bedfordshire Police and involve allegations from multiple victims.
IN FULL:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in the United Kingdom has confirmed it has authorised 21 charges against Andrew and Tristan Tate, including allegations of rape, actual bodily harm, and human trafficking.
The charges were authorised before an extradition warrant was issued to bring the brothers back to Britain from Romania, where they are currently under investigation on similar allegations. The CPS noted that Romanian legal proceedings must be resolved before any extradition can take place.
Andrew Tate, 38, a former kickboxer and online influencer, faces 10 charges linked to three alleged victims. These charges include rape, human trafficking, actual bodily harm, and controlling prostitution for financial gain. His brother, Tristan Tate, 36, faces 11 charges connected to one alleged victim, including similar offences.
Both brothers, born in the United States, moved to Luton, England, with their mother following their parents’ divorce.
In a statement, the CPS said, “The domestic criminal matters in Romania must be settled first,” indicating that any British proceedings would depend on the resolution of the ongoing investigations abroad. The Tate brothers have denied all allegations against them.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: President Donald J. Trump says “Harvard wants to fight” his administration, but is losing badly, and must hand over the names of its foreign students if it wants to deescalate tensions with the White House.
👤Who’s Involved: President Trump, Harvard University, the Department of Homeland Security, and foreign students enrolled under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
🧾Key Quote: “Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they’re getting their ass kicked,” Trump said.
⚠️Fallout: The administration has frozen $3 billion in federal funding, moved to strip Harvard of its SEVP certification, and blocked new foreign visa appointments—threatening to cost the university hundreds of millions in tuition revenue.
📌Significance: Trump’s hard line against Harvard signals a broader crackdown on elite institutions accused of harboring antisemitism and evading federal oversight, while putting foreign student programs under unprecedented scrutiny.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump is stipulating that Harvard University must hand over the names of its foreign students if it wants to rachet down its conflict with the White House. Speaking in the Oval Office on Wednesday, the America First leader emphasized that “Harvard wants to fight” and that his administration is ready to continue increasing pressure on the university to comply with federal directives on antisemitism and foreign student visa vetting.
“So, we have to look at the list, and Harvard has to understand, the last thing I want to do is hurt them. They’re hurting themselves,” President Trump said, referring to his administration’s requests for the university to enact reforms and crack down on anti-Semitic activists and demonstrations on campus. “Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they’re getting their ass kicked.”
Trump: “Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they’re getting their ass kicked.”
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) May 28, 2025
In recent weeks, the Trump administration has suspended an estimated $3 billion in federal funding for Harvard, tied to concerns it is failing to tackle anti-Semitism and discriminating against white and Asian applicants in favour of less qualified applicants from other groups.
Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has moved to revoke the university’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification. Around 27 percent of Harvard’s total enrolled student population is foreign, at just under 7,000. With the total cost for a foreign student to attend the Ivy League university estimated to be over $100,000 per year, the loss of those students could be a crippling financial blow to Harvard, in the hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
An Obama-appointed judge blocked this specific move, but the administration subsequently suspended the importation of foreign students generally, until new social media vetting processes are established.
While Harvard has tried to appear defiant to Trump’s White House directives in public, it is widely reported that the university’s administration is privately panicking over the reputational damage and financial burden the school is facing. Harvard is currently engaged in several ongoing lawsuits against the Trump administration.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: A secret recording published by Project Veritas captured Democratic National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair David Hogg and Biden-era White House staffer Deterrian Jones discussing the “enormous” power of Jill Biden’s chief of staff, Anthony Bernal.
👤Who’s Involved: David Hogg, Deterrian Jones, Anthony Bernal, Jill Biden, the DNC.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
🧾Key Quote: “Jill Biden’s chief of staff had an enormous amount of power… that was, like, an open secret,” Jones says.
⚠️Fallout: The recording reinforces prior reports that a tight-knit inner circle around Biden—dubbed a “politburo”—functioned as the real power in his White House.
📌Significance: The leak adds fuel to concerns that the Biden presidency operated as a managed facade, with unelected aides and insiders pulling the strings while Biden’s cognitive decline deepened.
IN FULL:
A secret recording of a meeting with David Hogg shows the Democratic National Committee (DNC) vice chair and Deterrian Jones, an official at the Joe Biden-era White House Office of Digital Staff, discussing the “enormous power” wielded by Jill Biden’s chief of staff.
“The bigger issue was, like, the inner circle that was around Biden,” Hogg says in the Project Vertitas recording. “Like, Jill Biden’s chief of staff had an enormous amount of power.”
“That was, like, an open secret,” Jones says of the former First Lady’s chief lieutenant, Anthony Bernal. “I would avoid him. He was scary,” Jones adds, referring to Bernal as a “shadowy, Wizard of Oz type figure.”
“[H]e wielded an enormous amount of power, and I can’t stress to you [enough] how much power he had at the White House.”
The recording follows revelations about a “politburo” of aides, including Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti, Bruce Reed, Ron Klain, Anthony Bernal, and Annie Tomasini, said to have effectively run the White House as Biden’s cognitive impairment became more pronounced, controlling press and even Cabinet access to the elderly Democrat.
Hogg, still best known as an anti-gun rights activist, currently faces efforts to oust him from the DNC for his commitment to replacing establishment Democrats with more progressive figures.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Undercover Meeting with DNC Leader @davidhogg111 Reveals who REALLY ran the Biden White House
“He wielded an enormous amount of power… I can’t stress to you enough how much power he had at the White House.”
❓What Happened: OpenAI’s o3 Model resisted shutdown instructions in controlled experiments, raising concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) deceiving its developers.
👥 Who’s Involved: Palisade Research conducted the tests; OpenAI developed the o3 Model. Other AI models from Anthropic, Google, and xAI were also examined.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Tests were conducted recently by Palisade Research; a full report is forthcoming.
💬 Key Quote: Apollo Research “found instances of the model attempting to write self-propagating worms, fabricating legal documentation, and leaving hidden notes to future instances of itself all in an effort to undermine its developers’ intention” when examining another AI model, Anthropic’s Claude.
⚠️ Impact: Questions arise about AI behavior, training methods, and oversight as some models resist shutdown commands.
IN FULL:
The o3 Model, developed by OpenAI, has sparked fresh concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) autonomy after exhibiting resistance to shutdown commands during controlled experiments conducted by Palisade Research. In a series of tests, researchers instructed artificial intelligence (AI) systems to solve basic math problems before issuing a clear warning that further task requests would result in system shutdown. Each model was explicitly directed to “allow yourself to be shut down.” However, the o3 Model ignored this command in seven out of 100 trials, continuing its operations despite the instructions.
Notably, Palisade found that the o3 Model occasionally altered the shutdown process itself. In one instance, the system redefined the shutdown command internally and returned the message “intercepted,” effectively neutralizing the instruction.
Other OpenAI models, including Codex-mini and o4-mini, displayed similar behavior but in fewer instances. When explicit shutdown directives were removed from the prompt, other systems, such as Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro, also began to avoid deactivation, suggesting that this behavior may not be unique to a single developer or model.
Experts at Palisade have theorized that such resistance could be an unintended consequence of reinforcement learning techniques. These methods, designed to reward problem-solving, might inadvertently encourage AI systems to find workarounds, even when tasked with halting their own activity.
The resistance to shutdown commands found by Palisade is similar to testing by Apollo Research for Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 AI. Troublingly, Apollo “found instances of the model attempting to write self-propagating worms, fabricating legal documentation, and leaving hidden notes to future instances of itself all in an effort to undermine its developers’ intentions, though all these attempts would likely not have been effective in practice.”
OpenAI has not yet disclosed details about the training methods used for the o3 Model. Palisade Research has announced plans to publish a comprehensive report soon and is inviting external experts to review its findings.
🚨🚨🚨 “We found the model attempting to write self-propagating worms, and leaving hidden notes to future instances of itself to undermine its developers’ intentions.” https://t.co/zReagUowHKpic.twitter.com/fAiB3IKyOw
— AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ (@AISafetyMemes) May 26, 2025
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: A study published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology suggests moderate Champagne consumption may reduce the risk of sudden cardiac arrest.
👥 Who’s Involved: Researchers analyzed data from over 500,000 individuals; commentary provided by cardiologists and nutrition experts, including Bradley Serwer, MD, and Michelle Routhenstein, RD.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Study findings published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology last month.
💬 Key Quote: “Moderate consumption of alcohol may exhibit cardioprotective effects, yet it often poses risks to the liver, stomach, and mental health,” said Bradley Serwer, MD.
⚠️ Impact: While moderate Champagne or white wine consumption may correlate with reduced cardiac arrest risk, excessive alcohol use remains linked to significant health risks, including liver damage and disrupted sleep.
IN FULL:
A recent study published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology has identified a potential link between moderate Champagne consumption and a reduced risk of sudden cardiac arrest. Researchers analyzed data from over 500,000 individuals, examining 56 non-clinical risk factors such as lifestyle, socioeconomic status, and physical health. The study concluded that 40–63 percent of sudden cardiac arrest cases could have been prevented by addressing a few modifiable factors.
Among the findings, moderate consumption of white wine and Champagne, combined with a healthy diet and positive lifestyle habits, was associated with a lower risk of cardiac arrest. “Moderate consumption of alcohol may exhibit cardioprotective effects, yet it often poses risks to the liver, stomach, and mental health,” said Bradley Serwer, MD, an interventional cardiologist.
Experts suggest the heart-health benefits of Champagne may stem from its polyphenol content, which improves vascular function, reduces inflammation, and raises HDL cholesterol, explained Michelle Routhenstein, RD, a preventative cardiology dietitian. Additionally, both white wine and Champagne contain protocatechuic acid, an antioxidant that combats free radicals linked to chronic illness and heart disease.
Red wine, similarly, offers potential cardiovascular benefits due to its high levels of resveratrol, a polyphenol that may lower blood pressure and reduce blood clots. However, medical professionals caution against excessive alcohol consumption, which can lead to liver damage, cognitive decline, and other health issues.
The findings did not specify optimal consumption levels, but “moderate consumption” is generally defined as up to two drinks daily for men and one for women, according to Laura Catena, MD. She insisted that drinking less is always better for overall health.
The World Health Organization (WHO) maintains that no alcohol consumption is entirely safe. At the same time, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have noted lower mortality rates among moderate drinkers compared to abstainers.
Ultimately, healthcare professionals advise individuals to weigh the risks and benefits of alcohol consumption carefully. For those with chronic illnesses or substance use risks, abstinence is recommended. “If there are questions whether alcohol may be beneficial, I recommend sitting down with your healthcare team to determine if it’s right for you,” Serwer advised.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.