Tuesday, October 14, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Scores of Arrests After Anti-ICE Violence Spread to New City.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Police in San Francisco arrested 60 people during a violent protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Sunday evening.

👥 Who’s Involved: Protesters, San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), NorCal Resist, and ICE.

📍 Where & When: Outside ICE headquarters in San Francisco, spreading downtown; began Sunday evening and ended early Monday morning.

💬 Key Quote: An SFPD spokesman stated that an “unlawful assembly” was declared after people in the crowd “became violent” and committed crimes ranging from “assault to felony vandalism.”

⚠️ Impact: Two officers sustained injuries, a firearm was recovered, and significant property damage occurred, including smashed storefronts and vandalized police cruisers.

IN FULL:

San Francisco police arrested 60 rioters late Sunday during a “solidarity” protest targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which escalated into violence and vandalism. This was organized to complement ongoing riots in Los Angeles, also directed at federal law enforcement.

The San Francisco protest began outside ICE headquarters, where demonstrators carrying Palestinian and other foreign flags and socialist placards gathered in support of pro-illegal immigrant agitators rioting against ICE raids in Los Angeles. As police arrived, the crowd reportedly moved toward officers, forming a line and pushing against them. Projectiles, including eggs and a glass bottle, were thrown at the headquarters and law enforcement officers, leading to a 40-minute standoff.

The San Francisco Police Department declared the gathering an unlawful assembly at 7:33 PM, citing escalating violence and criminal behavior. According to a police spokesman, offenses ranged from assault to felony vandalism. Juveniles were among those detained, and a firearm was recovered at the scene.

By 8:30 PM, many protesters had dispersed from ICE headquarters but spread into downtown San Francisco, where acts of vandalism continued. Buildings were tagged with graffiti, police cruisers were destroyed, and Chase Bank and Fendi storefronts were smashed.

Police began making arrests after corralling several dozen agitators who refused to disperse. Two officers sustained injuries during the unrest, one of whom required hospital treatment. The protest was organized, in part, by NorCal Resist, a group opposing deportation efforts.

In Los Angeles, President Donald J. Trump deployed 2,000 National Guardsmen to confront rioters, a move opposed by California Governor Gavin Newsom (D). This marked the first such federal deployment to California since 1965, during Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidency.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Family of Elijah Wilks: Police Shooting ‘Justified.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Dashcam footage revealed that Elijah Wilks was shot by an off-duty Milwaukee police officer after striking him in the face with a pistol and aiming the weapon at him.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Elijah Wilks, an off-duty Milwaukee police officer, and members of Wilks’s family.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on West Mill Road in Milwaukee, with footage released shortly after, ahead of the usual 15-day period.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The vantage point and resolution of the official dashcam video answers every question. The Wilks family has seen the truth for themselves. Now they want the public to see it too.” – B’Ivory LaMarr, attorney for the Wilks family.

🎯IMPACT: The release of the footage aims to combat misinformation and reduce the chances of “racial justice” rioting on behalf of Wilks, who was a black man.

IN FULL

The family of Elijah Wilks is backing an off-duty Milwaukee police officer’s decision to shoot their relative, stating it was “justified,” following the release of dashcam footage by authorities. The footage was shared earlier than the standard 15-day waiting period with the family’s permission to address misinformation surrounding the incident. Prior to the release, there were concerns in the community that far-left activists could try to turn the shooting into another George Floyd-esque moment and stoke violent riots in response.

The video, captured on the officer’s dashcam while he was on his way to work, shows Wilks swerving in front of the officer’s vehicle before both pulled over. Wilks exited his car, shouted expletives, and struck the officer in the face with a pistol. The footage then shows Wilks backing away, placing the gun in his pocket, and later retrieving it to aim at the officer, prompting the officer to open fire.

Wilks was pronounced dead at the scene. According to reports, he was heading to his uncle’s funeral later that day. The footage was released after low-quality surveillance videos led to confusion about the sequence of events. The family’s attorney, B’Ivory LaMarr, described the shooting as “justified” and emphasized the importance of transparency.

“The vantage point and resolution of the official dashcam video answers every question,” said LaMarr. “The Wilks family has seen the truth for themselves. Now they want the public to see it too. They are choosing truth over rumor—transparency over division.” He added that the case is about restoring public trust in law enforcement and ensuring accountability for all.

Wilks’s aunts, Latrice Bell and Andrea Ward, acknowledged the tragedy of the situation, with Bell stating, “That’s just something we have to live with.”

Ward added, “It could’ve been any one of us, any one of our kids, because we are all one seat away from making the wrong decision.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Canada’s Slippery Slope: Assisted Suicide Expands Into Organ Harvesting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A 38-year-old Canadian man with Lou Gehrig’s disease was euthanized under Canada’s MAID program and his heart transplanted into a 59-year-old man in Pittsburgh—raising concerns that patients may be pressured into euthanasia by medical professionals looking to harvest their healthy organs.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The euthanized donor was a 38-year-old Canadian; the recipient was a 59-year-old man from Pittsburgh.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The euthanization happened in Canada in September, with the transplant conducted in Pittsburgh.

💬KEY QUOTE: “With the development of biotechnology, human organs can be continuously transplanted, and people can live longer and longer, and even achieve immortality.” — Chinese President Xi Jinping

🎯IMPACT: The incident raises ethical concerns about increased pressure on vulnerable people to choose euthanasia.

IN FULL

Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) euthanasia program is running headlong into a multitude of ethical concerns, including broader controversies surrounding organ harvesting. Investigations in the United States by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)—a subagency of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—have found over the past several years that some patients may not have been legally deceased when organ retrieval was initiated.

In at least 28 cases reviewed by the HRSA, patients showed neurological signs inconsistent with brain death at the start of procurement. In Canada, the MAiD law is raising further concerns that patients may be pressured into euthanasia by medical professionals looking to harvest their healthy organs.

One of the more high-profile Canadian cases involves a 38-year-old man with Lou Gehrig’s disease who was euthanized in September. His heart was subsequently transplanted into a 59-year-old man from Pittsburgh, who had congestive heart failure. The donor heart was harvested and attached to a machine to keep it viable, and then sent to Pittsburgh for the transplant. This procedure has been described as the “ultimate act of altruism,” though it raises substantial ethical concerns.

Critics argue that such practices could result in pressure on vulnerable people to choose euthanasia, especially if they know their organs could benefit others. The potential for coercion is a significant worry as the scope of who qualifies for assisted suicide continues to expand in Canada.

Canada’s assisted suicide law, enacted in 2016, has led to a growing number of deaths attributed to MAiD, with nearly five percent of all deaths in the country in 2023 falling under this category. The practice, once limited to terminally ill patients, now includes those with serious but non-life-threatening conditions. The law’s expansion to include people with mental illness further complicates the ethical landscape.

Disturbingly, The National Pulse reported in early September that Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean autocrat Kim Jong-Un were caught on hot mic during an event in Beijing discussing how harvesting organs could be used to prolong their lives to 150 years.

“With the development of biotechnology, human organs can be continuously transplanted, and people can live longer and longer, and even achieve immortality,” Xi said.

Image by World Economic Forum / Sandra Blaser.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Russia: Ukrainian Intelligence Is Working With the Islamic State.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Russian authorities claim to have foiled an Islamic State-led terrorist attack in Moscow, allegedly directed by Ukrainian intelligence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), Islamic State (ISIS) operatives, Ukrainian intelligence, and four suspects, including Saidakbar Gulomov.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The plot was thwarted in Moscow, Russia, on Monday, per FSB statements.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The FSB has prevented a sabotage and terrorist act against one of the senior officers of the Russian Defense Ministry, organized by Ukrainian special services in coordination with leaders of the international terrorist organization Islamic State,” said the FSB.

🎯IMPACT: Russian authorities allege the incident highlights cooperation between Ukrainian intelligence and international terrorist organizations.

IN FULL

Russia announced on Monday that a terrorist attack in Moscow, allegedly planned by the Islamic State (ISIS) under the direction of Ukrainian intelligence, has been thwarted by its Federal Security Service (FSB). According to the FSB, ISIS operatives intended to target a high-ranking Russian Defense Ministry official with an explosive device in a crowded area of the city.

Four suspects, including a Central Asian national, were detained in connection with the plot. The FSB alleged that the operation was orchestrated by Ukrainian intelligence and executed by a suicide bomber recruited by an ISIS operative named Saidakbar Gulomov. The agency claimed Gulomov remotely directed the attacker’s actions from Ukraine and Western Europe using various messaging platforms.

Gulomov is also accused of providing funds, target information, and explosive materials smuggled into Russia via drones. The FSB further alleged that Gulomov was involved in the assassination of Russian Lieutenant General Kirillov in December 2024, an incident they also attribute to Ukrainian intelligence.

“The FSB has prevented a sabotage and terrorist act against one of the senior officers of the Russian Defense Ministry, organized by Ukrainian special services in coordination with leaders of the international terrorist organization Islamic State (banned as a terrorist organization in Russia),” the agency stated.

The FSB emphasized that this incident “once again demonstrates the close coordination between the Kiev regime and international terrorist organizations.” Previous terror attacks, such as a March 2024 assault on a concert hall near Moscow that killed 145 people, were similarly blamed on ISIS and Ukrainian intelligence by Russian authorities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Leftist Mayor Tortured Almost to Death by Adopted Migrant Daughter.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: German mayor Iris Stalzer was reportedly tortured for hours by her adopted migrant daughter, who has not been arrested despite the severity of the crime.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Iris Stalzer, her 17-year-old adopted daughter, her 15-year-old adopted son, and local law enforcement in Herdecke, Germany.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred on October 7, 2025, in Stalzer’s home in Herdecke, Germany.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Germans are being imprisoned for memes, while the daughter in this case will never appear before a court for her alleged heinous crimes.” – Austrian activist Martin Sellner

🎯IMPACT: The case is sparking outrage over perceived double standards in Germany’s justice system, with questions raised about why no charges have been filed.

IN FULL

New details have emerged in the case of Iris Stalzer, the Social Democrat (SPD) mayor of Herdecke, Germany, who was reportedly tortured for hours by her adopted 17-year-old migrant daughter. Despite the violent nature of the attack, no arrest warrants have been issued for the daughter or her 15-year-old brother, who is also believed to have been involved.

The incident occurred on October 7, 2025. Emergency services were called by the daughter, who initially claimed that her mother had been assaulted by “several men.” Police later determined that this version of events was fabricated to conceal the true nature of the attack. Investigators believe Stalzer was tortured in the basement of her home, where she was subjected to burns from deodorant spray ignited with a lighter and stabbed 13 times. One of the knives used in the attack was reportedly found in the brother’s backpack, along with bloody clothing, while another knife was discovered in his bedroom. Police also found evidence that blood had been scrubbed from parts of the crime scene.

Although the evidence suggests a deliberate and prolonged assault, prosecutors have not brought charges. According to statements, the fact that the daughter eventually called emergency services was taken as an indication that she did not intend to kill her adoptive mother. Both siblings have since been placed in the care of the Youth Welfare Office rather than facing detention or prosecution. The prosecutor also noted that the children’s father, once considered as a possible guardian, had also previously been a victim of violence by the daughter.

The case has sparked widespread public anger, with many critics accusing the justice system of a double standard. Austrian anti-mass migration activist Martin Sellner commented on the situation, saying, “Germans are being imprisoned for memes, while the daughter in this case will never appear before a court for her alleged heinous crimes.”

Concerns over selective prosecution in Germany have been growing. In recent months, authorities have faced criticism for criminal investigations and penalties targeting people over social media posts and political expression. One woman was prosecuted for reacting with ‘thumbs up’ emojis to a social media post about a 15-year-old killing a rapist migrant, while others were prevented from leaving Germany to attend a remigration conference abroad.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Democrat Govt Shutdown Delays Farm Relief Amid U.S.-China Trade War.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump White House says it will soon roll out relief to U.S. soybean farmers who are facing significant challenges due to a trade dispute with China, their largest export market, which has ceased purchasing U.S. soybeans.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. soybean farmers, President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Senate Democrats, and China.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The situation has been unfolding throughout 2025, with impacts felt across soybean-producing states like Minnesota, Illinois, and Arkansas.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They politicized the soybean purchases. And most of them have gone to Brazil. We are not going to let that happen. And I believe that the Chinese will have to come back at the end of the season and buy soybeans.” — U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

🎯IMPACT: Farmers are struggling with financial uncertainty, higher input costs, and the inability to sell their crops to their largest market, China, while relief is delayed due to the Senate Democrats’ government shutdown.

IN FULL

American soybean farmers across key agricultural states like Minnesota, Illinois, and Arkansas are nearing the completion of their annual harvest. However, they may not have any markets to export their product to. The ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China has seen soybean farmers take a hit as China, which typically purchases over $12 billion worth of American soybeans annually, has not bought any this year.

In the face of the trade dispute, President Donald J. Trump has indicated that soybean farmers impacted by tariffs may receive financial assistance, but no specific plan has been announced due to the ongoing Senate Democrats’ government shutdown. “President Trump, Secretary Bessent, and Secretary Rollins are always in touch about the needs of our farmers,” said White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly. “Unfortunately, Democrats in Congress have stalled progress on this issue with their prolonged shutdown to serve illegal immigrants instead of America’s farmers.”

Soybean farmers, particularly those in rural areas, face mounting challenges as input costs like fertilizer and seed rise, while prices for their crops remain stagnant. Many farmers are hoping for a trade deal with China that could stabilize the market.

The Chinese have tried to ramp up their side of the trade dispute ahead of this meeting in the hopes of maximizing leverage, though President Trump has thus far called Xi’s bluff. “They politicized the soybean purchases. And most of them have gone to Brazil. We are not going to let that happen. And I believe that the Chinese will have to come back at the end of the season and buy soybeans,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said during a television appearance earlier this week, suggesting both government relief and a long-term deal on soybeans with China is likely in the near future.

The American Soybean Association has urged the administration to resolve the trade dispute, warning that farmers are “standing at a trade and financial precipice.” While some farmers have alternative markets to sell their soybeans, many are left with limited options.

Republican lawmakers have expressed sympathy for the farmers, with Congressman James Comer (R-KY) stating, “They planted that crop assuming that those foreign markets were going to be there. I think we need to do something to help the soybean farmers.”

Image by Victoria Pickering.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

County Reinstates Mask Mandate, Vaccine Guidance Over Supposed COVID Risk.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Sonoma County in California has issued a mask mandate for certain healthcare facilities and strengthened vaccine recommendations due to “greater risk” of COVID-19 and flu.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sonoma County Department of Public Health Interim Health Officer Dr. Karen Smith, local healthcare facilities, and members of the public.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The mask mandate begins November 1, 2025, and continues annually through March 31, 2026, in Sonoma County, California.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The rationale behind this order is to protect the most vulnerable populations (such as the elderly and cancer patients) and to try to prevent medical staff from getting sick and creating staffing problems for facilities.” – Sonoma County Department of Health spokesman.

🎯IMPACT: The mandate and recommendations aim to protect vulnerable populations but contradict recent federal guidance from the CDC and HHS on COVID-19 vaccinations.

IN FULL

Sonoma County, California, has reimplemented a mask mandate for certain healthcare facilities and bolstered its vaccine recommendations, citing a “greater risk” of COVID-19 and flu during the season. The Sonoma County Department of Public Health’s Interim Health Officer, Dr. Karen Smith, announced the order, requiring masks in skilled nursing facilities, portions of long-term care facilities, acute and non-acute rehabilitation facilities, infusion centers, and dialysis centers.

“The rationale behind this order is to protect the most vulnerable populations (such as the elderly and cancer patients) and to try to prevent medical staff from getting sick and creating staffing problems for facilities,” a spokesman for the Sonoma County Department of Health stated. The mask mandate will run from November 1, 2025, through March 31, 2026, and will be implemented annually unless rescinded. Exemptions are provided for individuals with medical conditions, mental health conditions, or disabilities preventing mask use, as well as those who rely on lip-reading for communication.

The order specifies acceptable masks, including surgical masks, KN95, KF94, or N95 respirators, while informal coverings such as scarves, bandanas, or masks with unfiltered exhaust valves are not permitted. Alongside the mandate, Dr. Smith has issued stronger guidance on COVID-19 and flu vaccines, recommending them for everyone aged just six months and older. She also advised both the vaccinated and unvaccinated to wear masks in indoor public spaces when the risk of COVID-19 or flu is high.

This guidance contrasts with recent federal recommendations. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have removed the recommendation for adults aged 65 and older to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. They now advise individuals aged six months to 64 years to consult with their doctors before making vaccination decisions. The HHS has also narrowed the approval scope for new COVID-19 vaccines, emphasizing “science, safety, and common sense.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Dem State Backs Down on Forcing Priests to Violate Seal of Confession.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Washington State has settled a legal case that will end attempts to force Catholic priests to violate the seal of the sacrament of confession.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Washington State, the Roman Catholic Church, the Archdiocese of Seattle, and The Washington State Catholic Conference.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Washington State Catholic Conference announced the settlement on October 10.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re grateful Washington ultimately recognized it can prevent abuse without forcing priests to violate their sacred vows.” – Washington State Catholic Conference.

🎯IMPACT: The settlement will allow priests to continue to hear confessions and uphold the seal of confession without threat of prison time or fines.

IN FULL

The State of Washington has agreed to a legal settlement that blocks enforcement of a controversial law that would have required Roman Catholic priests to report child abuse heard during the sacrament of confession. The settlement comes after a federal court issued an injunction this summer, ruling the law likely violated constitutional protections for religious freedom.

The law, originally scheduled to take effect on July 27, would have imposed penalties of up to 364 days in jail, a $5,000 fine, and potential civil liability for clergy who failed to report abuse disclosed in confession. While Washington argued the law aimed to protect minors, it maintained confidentiality protections for attorneys and other professionals, excluding only clergy in cases involving sacramental confession.

The Washington State Catholic Conference welcomed the settlement, stating, “In every other setting other than the confessional, the Church has long supported—and continues to support—mandatory reporting. We’re grateful Washington ultimately recognized it can prevent abuse without forcing priests to violate their sacred vows.”

Notably, the Archdiocese of Seattle and the Dioceses of Spokane and Yakima already require all Church personnel to report suspected abuse to law enforcement outside of the confessional setting.

In June, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration sued the state, calling the law a direct violation of the First Amendment. A federal judge agreed, writing that “the targeted exception for clergy raises concerns,” and noted that the law placed priests in an unconstitutional dilemma: violate their religious duty or face criminal penalties.

The dispute in Washington follows similar efforts in other states. In 2019, California introduced a bill that would have required priests to report abuse admitted in confession under certain conditions. That bill was later withdrawn after widespread public backlash and constitutional concerns.

The Catholic Church teaches that the seal of confession is absolute, and priests who violate it face the highest canonical penalty: automatic excommunication. Even indirect breaches can lead to removal from the priesthood. Many clergy have stated they would rather face imprisonment than violate the confessional seal.

Image by ctj71081.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

María Corina Machado Dedicates Nobel Prize to Trump for Venezuelan Liberation Efforts.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: María Corina Machado, a prominent Venezuelan opposition leader who was awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her decades-long advocacy against socialism and for democratic rights in Venezuela, is dedicating the honor to U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: María Corina Machado, President Donald Trump, the Norwegian Nobel Committee, and Nicolás Maduro’s regime in Venezuela.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Nobel Peace Prize was announced on Friday morning, Oslo time, in 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I dedicate this prize to the suffering people of Venezuela and to President Trump for his decisive support of our cause!” – María Corina Machado

🎯IMPACT: The recognition highlights the ongoing struggle against state socialism in Venezuela and underscores the international support for democratic values in the region.

IN FULL

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado dedicated her 2025 Nobel Peace Prize to U.S. President Donald J. Trump and the people of Venezuela, stating the South American nation needed Trump’s support “more than ever.” Machado—an outspoken supporter of Trump—has previously called the U.S. President a “visionary” and the “biggest opportunity we’ve ever had” for ending Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro‘s regime.

Early Friday morning, the Norwegian Nobel Committee named Marchado its 2025 Nobel Peace Prize recipient, citing her decades of advocacy against state socialism in her native Venezuela. The committee congratulated Machado for “her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.”

After being awarded the prize, Machado—who remains in hiding in Venezuela—declared that Venezuelan opposition activists continue to chip away at the Maduro regime. Notably, the U.S. military has moved significant air force and naval assets into the Caribbean, and there has been considerable chatter that strikes against Venezuela could happen at any moment. For her part, Machado insists opposition forces are “on the threshold of victory.”

“We are on the threshold of victory and today, more than ever, we count on President Trump, the people of the United States, the peoples of Latin America, and the democratic nations of the world as our principal allies to achieve Freedom and democracy,” Machado said, noting that President Trump’s recent military strikes against drug smugglers in the Caribbean, as well as tariff and sanction actions against China and Iran, have successfully stripped Maduro of weapons and money.

Government leaders from Israel, Cambodia, Rwanda, Pakistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Gabon all backed Trump as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his brokering of multiple peace agreements and ceasefires over the last nine months.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mehdi Hasan ‘Fears’ Hamas Will Lose Leverage Against Israel When Hostages Are Returned.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Former MSNBC host and Islamist Mehdi Hasan expressed his worry that Hamas is losing leverage in a peace deal brokered by President Donald J. Trump, as hostages are returned to Israel.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mehdi Hasan, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Hamas.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Statements made on October 9, 2025, via social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

💬KEY QUOTE: “I said yesterday that my biggest fear was that Israel uses this deal to get back their remaining hostages and then restarts the bombing and genocide.” – Mehdi Hasan

🎯IMPACT: Hasan’s remarks have drawn criticism for appearing to lament the return of hostages to their families and loved ones.

IN FULL

Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan is facing backlash over remarks he made criticizing the recent peace agreement between Israel and Hamas. The deal, brokered by President Donald J. Trump, includes the return of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. In a post on X (formerly Twitter) dated October 9, Hasan wrote, “I said yesterday that my biggest fear was that Israel uses this deal to get back their remaining hostages and then restarts the bombing and genocide.” He argued that the return of hostages would cause Hamas to lose its leverage, which he described as existing “in the form of Jewish lives.”

Hasan, who has been recorded describing non-Muslims as “animals,” cited Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to support his concern. Smotrich has emphasized the importance of dismantling Hamas and disarming Gaza, but he voted against the peace deal, which was approved by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his cabinet.

Hasan’s professional background has also attracted attention. After being let go from MSNBC in 2024, he rejoined Qatari-funded Al Jazeera and has continued to amplify anti-Israel commentary.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trevor Noah Mocks Charlie Kirk’s ‘Funny’ Assassination.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Trevor Noah mocked the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk during a stand-up performance.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Trevor Noah, Charlie Kirk, Dave Chappelle, and Jimmy Kimmel.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Noah made the remarks during a recent stand-up performance; Kirk was assassinated on September 10 at Utah Valley University.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The guy was shot while defending guns… I’m not even writing that as a joke. As a human, you have to admit that it is an incongruous, funny thing that happens. You’re onstage, like, ‘Let me tell you why people should have guns.’ Wa-pow!” Noah said, inaccurately.

🎯IMPACT: Noah’s comments sparked backlash, with critics pointing to double standards and insensitivity.

IN FULL

Former Daily Show host Trevor Noah is facing backlash for mocking the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk. Kirk was assassinated on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University. During a stand-up performance, Noah complained that comedians were being advised not to “say anything about Charlie Kirk” because there was “nothing funny about it.”

“Now you tested me. I mean, there’s nothing funny about it? Don’t say that, because then I’ll be like, ‘I’m sure there’s something funny about it,’” he continued.

“The guy was shot while defending guns… I’m not even writing that as a joke. As a human, you have to admit that is an incongruous, funny thing that happens. “You’re onstage, like, ‘Let me tell you why people should have guns.’ Wa-pow!” he added—inaccurately, as Kirk was actually discussing transgender mass shooters when he was murdered.

Noah cast himself as a martyr for comedy following the resulting backlash, comparing the public’s anger at his remarks to historical jokes about President Abraham Lincoln’s assassination and complaining that audiences shouldn’t be “terrorized” into silence.

However, critics have pointed to Noah’s recent praise for Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh Comedy Festival, where he had lauded the sharia state as “moving in the right direction” on civil liberties, despite its severe blasphemy and censorship laws.

Noah is not the only alleged comedian under scrutiny. Jimmy Kimmel also faced criticism for falsely suggesting that Kirk’s assassin was affiliated with the MAGA movement. Meanwhile, Education Secretary Linda McMahon has urged universities to sanction faculty who applauded the killing online.

Conservative activist Scott Presler claimed to have received over 51,000 tips identifying individuals, many of them teachers, who mocked Kirk’s death on social media. A website called “Charlie’s Murderers” was launched to document these posts, and some have reportedly been fired or disciplined in response.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.