Friday, October 24, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

TSA Finally Ends ‘Shoes Off’ Rule.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has announced that passengers will no longer need to remove their shoes during airport security screenings.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The TSA, passengers at U.S. airports, and Muslim convert Richard Reid, a.k.a. Abdul Raheem, the “Shoe Bomber.”

📍WHEN & WHERE: The change takes effect on July 13, 2024, and will apply to all U.S. airports.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I flew through LaGuardia this morning and when I went to take my shoes off, the TSA agent yelled at me like I was a crazy person doing something completely unexpected,” said one passenger on X (formerly Twitter).

🎯IMPACT: The change aims to streamline airport security processes, though some have raised concerns about potential security risks.

IN FULL

Passengers traveling through U.S. airports will no longer have to remove their shoes during security screenings, according to a new memo from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). The policy change, which will take effect on July 13, was revealed in a message sent to TSA staff last week.

This adjustment comes after years of enforcement of the “no shoe rule,” implemented following an attempt by Muslim convert Richard Reid, a.k.a. Abdul Raheem, to detonate explosives hidden in his shoes on American Airlines Flight 63 in December 2001. Reid’s actions, which occurred just months after the September 11 terror attacks, led to heightened security protocols, including mandatory shoe removal during screenings.

Passengers have already started noticing the change. CBS News reported that travelers at Los Angeles International Airport and New York City’s LaGuardia Airport were allowed to keep their shoes on during security checks earlier this week. Online, many passengers expressed relief, with one saying, “I flew through LaGuardia this morning and when I went to take my shoes off, the TSA agent yelled at me like I was a crazy person doing something completely unexpected.”

Some have voiced concerns over the potential security implications of the new policy. However, the TSA memo indicates that passengers who trigger security scanners will still be required to remove their shoes for additional screening.

The TSA has not yet issued an official public statement, though the policy is expected to be rolled out nationwide.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Hecklers Brand Kamala a ‘War Criminal,’ ‘Genocide Enabler’ at London Book Tour Event.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris faced protests during her book tour stop in London, England, with three separate interruptions from pro-Palestinian demonstrators.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former Vice President Kamala Harris, protesters, and audience members at the Southbank Centre event.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The evening of October 23 at the Southbank Centre in London, England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Kamala Harris not welcome here!” – Pro-Palestinian protesters.

🎯IMPACT: The protests highlight Harris’s lack of popularity among leftist activists, tied to the Biden-Harris government’s actions during the Israel-Hamas war.

IN FULL

Former Vice President and failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris was interrupted several times by protesters during her book tour event in London, England. Within minutes of taking the stage at the Southbank Centre to promote her memoir 107 Days, three separate demonstrators heckled her over the conflict in Gaza. Outside the venue, protesters gathered with Palestinian flags and a banner reading “genocide enablers are war criminals,” chanting “Kamala Harris not welcome here!”

“I understand the passion and the emotion and the feeling based on everything that has happened in Gaza,” Harris said, reflecting on her time in the Biden regime and suggesting that her team could have taken alternative actions. “As I write in the book, we had levers we did not exercise,” she admits.

The protests reflect broader discontent with Harris’s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict during her vice presidency. Many pro-Palestinian groups criticized the administration for continuing arms sales to Israel, and some withdrew support during the 2024 election campaign. These tensions have followed her on the 107 Days book tour, where she has faced similar protests in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C.

In conversation with author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Harris discussed her brief 2024 presidential campaign following Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the race in August that year after a disastrous debate against President Donald J. Trump. “We did not have enough time even with 107 days,” she claimed, referring to the three-and-a-half-month campaign chronicled in her memoir.

Harris’s global book tour, organized by Simon & Schuster, runs through November 20. It will visit 15 cities across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The tour has drawn mixed reactions, with some events reportedly underselling tickets and others drawing crowds of both election-denying supporters and critics.

Though Harris recently ruled out a run for California governor in 2026, she has not confirmed whether she will seek the presidency again in 2028.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Faces Lawsuit Over White House Ballroom.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Virginia couple filed a lawsuit to stop the demolition of the White House East Wing as part of President Donald J. Trump’s $300 million plan to build a new ballroom and modernize the structure.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Plaintiffs Charles and Judith Voorhees, President Trump, and National Park Service Director Jessica Brown.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on October 23, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In order to do it properly, we had to take down the existing structure.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: While a court date has not yet been set, the lawsuit is unlikely to advance much further. The initial filing does not actually include a formal complaint, and at least one of the laws cited as grounds for the temporary restraining order has specific and clear exemptions for the White House, the Supreme Court, and the U.S Capitol.

IN FULL

Virginia couple Charles and Judith Voorhees filed an emergency motion in federal court on October 23 to halt the demolition of the White House complex’s East Wing outbuilding, part of President Donald J. Trump‘s $300 million plan to build a new ballroom on the executive grounds for state events. In the filing, the Voorhees allege the demolition and planned ballroom violate multiple federal preservation and planning laws.

The lawsuit argues that the Trump administration bypassed laws meant to protect national landmarks and ensure public transparency. The filing requests a temporary restraining order “to halt defendants’ destruction of the East Wing of the White House… without legally required approvals or reviews,” according to the plaintiffs’ application for injunctive relief. Attorney Mark R. Denicore, representing the Voorheeses, stated, “I threw that together as fast as I could to try to get it filed as fast as I could.”

While a court date has not yet been set, the lawsuit is unlikely to advance much further. The initial filing doesn’t actually include a formal complaint, and at least one of the laws cited as grounds for the temporary restraining order has specific and clear exemptions for the White House, the Supreme Court, and the U.S Capitol.

The East Wing, historically home to first ladies’ offices and ceremonial events, has already been partially demolished as part of Trump’s proposal to construct a ballroom for official events with large attendance, like state dinners. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration had made clear that the East Wing—a largely 1940s construction entirely separate from the iconic White House Executive Residence—would need to be “modernized” and noted that “plans changed” after consulting with architects and construction firms.

The planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom will replace the “small, heavily changed, and reconstructed East Wing” with a larger facility capable of hosting 650 guests, according to a White House press release. The project will be funded by President Trump and other private donors.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Chinese Cartel Money Man Extradited to U.S. from Cuba Following Escape from Mexico.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Chinese citizen accused of trafficking fentanyl has been extradited from Cuba to the United States after escaping from Mexican custody in July.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zhi Dong Zhang, also known as “Brother Wang,” along with the governments of the United States, Mexico, and Cuba.

📍WHEN & WHERE: This development occurred following Zhang’s escape from house arrest in Mexico in July.

💬KEY QUOTE: “A major international money laundering operator,” said Mexico’s Security Secretary, Omar Garcia Harfuch, about Zhang.

🎯IMPACT: The extradition is part of efforts to curb drug trafficking, particularly fentanyl, amid pressure from the Trump administration.

IN FULL

Cartel money launderer and facilitator Zhi Dong Zhang, known as “Brother Wang,” has been extradited from Cuba to the United States, following his escape from house arrest in Mexico in July. This was confirmed by the Mexican government, which played a role in securing the transfer.

Zhang is alleged to have collaborated with Mexico’s Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation drug cartels, both labeled as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) by U.S. President Donald J. Trump earlier this year. His extradition came after a formal request, according to the Cuban government, although it remains unclear whether he was transferred via Mexico or directly from Cuba.

Omar Garcia Harfuch, Mexico’s Security Secretary, described Zhang as “a major international money laundering operator” last year. Zhang was reportedly responsible for establishing connections with other cartels to facilitate the transfer of fentanyl from China to various regions, including Central America, South America, Europe, and the United States.

Since President Trump returned to the White House in January, there has been increased pressure on Mexico and China to crack down on drug trafficking, especially concerning fentanyl. The synthetic opioid is significantly more potent than heroin and has become a leading cause of overdoses in the United States, replacing heroin and prescription opioids like oxycodone.

Since late September, the U.S. military has also conducted a number of military strikes against cartel drug boats operating in the Caribbean and the Pacific. On October 2, Trump formally notified Congress that the United States is now engaged in an official “armed conflict” with South and Central American drug cartels.

Image via Omar H Garcia Harfuch.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Federal Judge Overturns Biden-Era Expansion of Title IX Protections to Include ‘Gender Identity.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge struck down a Joe Biden-era rule that expanded anti-discrimination measures to transgender healthcare, stating that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) exceeded its authority.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Judge Louis Guirola Jr., a coalition of 15 Republican-led states, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling came from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi and follows a lawsuit filed by 15 states.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This decision restores not just common sense but also constitutional limits on federal overreach,” said Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling vacates the rule universally, reinforcing states’ rights to regulate healthcare without federal overreach.

IN FULL

A federal judge has ruled against a former Biden government policy that expanded anti-discrimination protections to include gender identity in healthcare. Judge Louis Guirola Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi declared that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “exceeded its authority” in redefining sex discrimination under Title IX to include gender identity.

The legal challenge was brought by a coalition of 15 Republican-led states, including Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, and others. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti (R) praised the ruling, stating, “When Biden-era bureaucrats tried to illegally rewrite our laws to force radical gender ideology into every corner of American healthcare, Tennessee stood strong and stopped them.”

Skrmetti’s office highlighted that the rule would have mandated healthcare providers to offer gender dysphoria treatments, prohibited sex-segregated spaces, and required states to subsidize such treatments through Medicaid. The court determined that Congress’s original intent in 1972’s Title IX referred to biological sex, not gender identity. It stressed that federal agencies cannot unilaterally rewrite laws to advance political agendas.

The rule was originally introduced under the Obama administration in 2016, reversed by the Trump administration, and later reinstated by the Biden government. However, the policy had already been stayed since July 2024, preventing it from taking effect. Judge Guirola’s ruling now vacates the rule entirely.

“This decision restores not just common sense but also constitutional limits on federal overreach, and I am proud of the team of excellent attorneys who fought this through to the finish,” Skrmetti added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Halts Trade Talks with Canada Amid Ontario’s Anti-Tariff Propaganda Campaign.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump terminated all trade negotiations with Canada following a misleading anti-tariff advertising campaign funded by the Ontario provincial government.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Premier Doug Ford and the Ontario provincial government, and the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The developments unfolded late Thursday night, with statements released on social media.

💬KEY QUOTE: “TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” said President Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The Ontario government’s media campaign appears to have derailed U.S.-Canada trade talks, marking the second time the province’s premier, Doug Ford, has done so.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump broke off trade talks with Canada after one of its provincial governments launched a media campaign attacking the America First leader’s tariff policies. The Ontario provincial government is behind the anti-tariff television spots, which have aired on Newsmax, Bloomberg, Fox News, NBC, and ABC.

The advertisement uses selective audio from former President Ronald Reagan, warning against tariffs. In the edited clip, Reagan states, “High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars.” He added, “Then the worst happens: Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs.” In another part of the advertisement, lines from two separate segments of Reagan’s speech are stitched together, altering the context of what the former President was saying.

President Trump responded to the misleading media campaign late Thursday, writing in a post on Truth Social,  “The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.”  He continued: “The ad was for $75,000,000. They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts. TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”

Likewise, the Ronald Reagan Foundation issued a statement condemning the ad spot and threatened legal action unless it was taken off the air, as “the Government of Ontario did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.” The non-profit group also posted the full, unedited audio of Reagan’s April 25, 1987, “Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade,” from which the edited clips were taken.

This is not the first time Canada’s Ontario province has meddled in trade talks with the U.S. This past March, Ontario’s premier, Doug Ford, was forced to drop retaliatory energy tariffs after pressure from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Trump White House. Ford had imposed the energy tax just 24 hours prior, setting off a brief escalation in trade tensions.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Japan’s First Woman Prime Minister Pledges Crackdown on Criminal Migrants.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, announced she will be cracking down on criminal migrants in her first speech as PM.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, President Donald J. Trump, and regional actors such as China, Russia, and North Korea.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Takaichi took office on October 21; discussions with Trump are scheduled for October 27-29 in Tokyo.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is a fact that unlawful activity and violation of rules by some foreigners are causing the sense of unease and unfairness among Japanese people.” – Sanae Takaichi

🎯IMPACT: Japan’s concern over criminal migrants comes as the country struggles with historic low birth rates, with some are calling for more migration to fill gaps in the workforce.

IN FULL

Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, has pledged to tighten enforcement against criminal activity by migrants, linking domestic security concerns to her broader national defense agenda. Takaichi, who became the country’s first female leader this week, said her government would act decisively in response to rising public unease about unlawful behavior among some foreigners.

“It is a fact that unlawful activity and violation of rules by some foreigners are causing the sense of unease and unfairness among Japanese people,” Takaichi said in her first address after taking office. “The government will respond decisively to these activities. It’s not xenophobia,” she added.

She announced that her administration will strengthen oversight of foreign workers and consider new restrictions on foreign land purchases. Kimi Onoda, appointed as economic security minister, will oversee these measures as part of a wider plan to protect Japan’s economic and social stability.

While Takaichi also reaffirmed her commitment to boosting defense spending to two percent of GDP by March 2026, one year earlier than planned, her early rhetoric has emphasized the need to maintain internal order alongside external security. She cited “grave concerns” about the military activities of neighboring China, North Korea, and Russia, saying Japan must be prepared to safeguard its sovereignty amid shifting global power dynamics.

Takaichi’s remarks come as Japan grapples with long-term demographic challenges. The nation’s birth rate has fallen to its lowest point in 125 years, with fewer than 700,000 babies born last year and the fertility rate dropping to around 1.15 children per woman. More than 30 percent of the population is now over 65, and the shrinking workforce has prompted debates about whether Japan should embrace mass migration.

Despite its labor shortages, Japan has maintained one of the strictest immigration policies among developed nations. In 2023, it granted asylum to just 303 people, rejecting roughly 98 percent of applicants. Takaichi’s latest comments suggest her government will continue that cautious approach, focusing instead on tightening enforcement and deterring foreign residents who break the law.

On the international stage, Takaichi is preparing to host President Donald J. Trump for a summit in Tokyo from October 27 to 29. The two leaders are expected to discuss strengthening the Japan–U.S. alliance, further defense cooperation, and migration issues. Trump, who praised Takaichi after her election, called her “a highly respected person of great wisdom and strength” and said her victory was “tremendous news for the incredible people of Japan.”

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Stocks Soar as Inflation Beats Wall Street Expectations Again.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The government released September’s inflation report, showing a three percent rise in prices over the past year, below Wall Street’s forecast.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wall Street investors, and the federal government.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The report was released on Friday, October 24, 2025, after a nine-day delay caused by the government shutdown.

🎯IMPACT: Investors welcomed the news, with inflation remaining flat overall, though rising fuel and food prices remain a concern.

IN FULL

The government released September’s long-delayed inflation report, showing a three percent rise in prices over the past 12 months. This figure fell short of Wall Street’s forecast of 3.1 percent, sending stocks soaring at the market open.

The report was released nine days later than expected due to the government shutdown. Federal employees were temporarily called back to complete the data, which is likely the last major economic release until lawmakers finalize a budget deal.

Investors, who have spent 23 days relying on narrower economic indicators like corporate earnings and private jobs data, welcomed the report. However, September’s three percent inflation rate still marks the highest reading of 2025 so far.

Fuel prices rose more than four percent last month and could climb further following new sanctions imposed by President Donald J. Trump on two Russian oil giants. However, gas prices at the pump are down considerably and approaching a four-year low, thanks to President Donald J. Trump moves to boost energy production and the stability in the Middle East achieved by his Gaza ceasefire deal.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘I Got That White Girl’ Murder Suspect Faces Death Penalty.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A career criminal was indicted on federal charges after fatally stabbing a Ukrainian refugee aboard a train in Charlotte, North Carolina.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, and Iryna Zarutska, 23, who fled Ukraine in 2022.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred on August 22, 2025, aboard a Lynx Blue Line train in Charlotte, North Carolina.

💬KEY QUOTE:  “We are hopeful for swift justice.” – Lauren Newton, a lawyer representing the Zarutska family.

🎯IMPACT: The case has reignited debates over crime policies, with North Carolina reinstating the death penalty under a new law called ‘Iryna’s Law.’

IN FULL

Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of violence against a railroad carrier and a mass transportation system resulting in death. The charges stem from the August 22, 2025, fatal stabbing of 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska aboard a Lynx Blue Line train in Charlotte, North Carolina. Federal prosecutors confirmed that Brown, who has a history of violent offenses, could face the death penalty if convicted.

According to investigators, Brown attacked Zarutska from behind with a pocketknife after observing her for several minutes. Surveillance video shows him standing behind her before suddenly stabbing her multiple times. Zarutska was later pronounced dead at the scene.

“We are hopeful for swift justice,” Lauren Newton, a lawyer representing the Zarutska family, stated in the wake of the indictment, adding that the family was pleased about the federal grand jury’s decision.

Authorities later revealed that Brown shouted, “I got that white girl,” during or after the assault, prompting the U.S. Department of Justice to review the case as a possible federal hate crime. Brown’s criminal record includes a 2015 conviction for armed robbery and several subsequent arrests. He had been released shortly before the murder following a misdemeanor charge, a fact that has drawn sharp criticism of the justice system’s handling of repeat offenders. “I strongly feel like he should not have been on the streets at all,” said Tracey, Brown’s sister, noting his longstanding issues with mental illness.

The killing has reignited national debate over public safety, mental health, and criminal justice reform. North Carolina Governor Josh Stein responded by signing “Iryna’s Law” earlier this month, a sweeping package that reinstates the death penalty in the state after a two-decade moratorium, ends cashless bail for violent and repeat offenders, and accelerates capital punishment cases. Stein supported most of the bill but objected to a controversial clause permitting execution by firing squad.

President Donald J. Trump also addressed the case during a September 9 speech, using it to criticize Democratic leaders for lenient crime policies. “In Charlotte, North Carolina, we saw the results of these policies when a 23-year-old woman who came here from Ukraine met her bloody end on a public train,” Trump said.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Google Manhattan Campus Shuts Down Amid Bed Bug Crisis.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Google’s Chelsea office in New York was closed due to a reported bed bug infestation, according to exterminators using a K9 unit.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Google employees in New York, exterminators, and bed bug-sniffing dogs.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The closure occurred over the weekend at Google’s Chelsea campus, with investigations ongoing at other Manhattan offices.

🎯IMPACT: The office reopened Monday, but the incident highlights ongoing concerns about workplace hygiene and pest control reliability.

IN FULL

Google employees in New York were advised over the weekend to stay away from the company’s Chelsea office after exterminators found “credible evidence” of bed bugs. A pest control team used a bed bug–sniffing dog to inspect the premises, leading to a temporary closure of the office.

The building reopened on Monday while inspections continue at Google’s three other Manhattan locations. Employees were asked to report any signs of “bed bug exposure” or additional sightings.

Unconfirmed rumors suggested that a collection of large stuffed animals in the Chelsea office may have contributed to the outbreak. Google declined to comment, but this is not the first time Google’s Chelsea campus has dealt with bed bugs. In 2010, the company temporarily closed part of the same office after an infestation, which became public after an employee’s tweet.

The latest incident adds to a chaotic period for the tech giant. In recent months, Google has faced mounting political and legal scrutiny. In August, Google was accused of routing Republican fundraising emails containing WinRed links to spam folders while allowing similar Democratic fundraising emails from ActBlue to reach inboxes. GOP strategists warned the practice could “tilt the playing field in ways that voters never see.”

The company is also the target of a major antitrust effort by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Federal prosecutors are seeking to restructure Google’s advertising business after a Virginia judge found parts of its ad-tech system violated antitrust laws. “The purpose of a remedy is doing what is necessary to restore competition,” DOJ attorney Julia Tarver Wood said.

Image by Tomasz Molina.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Researchers Find TikTok Algorithm Favors Pro-Mamdani Content.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Researchers say TikTok’s algorithm systematically boosts pro-Zohran Mamdani content and suppresses pro-Andrew Cuomo content in New York City’s mayoral race.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Spring AI, led by CTO Yehonatan Dodeles, conducted the research; TikTok’s algorithm is under scrutiny.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Findings were announced on October 21 via X and published on Medium; the issue pertains to TikTok’s influence in the New York City mayoral elections.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Our new research suggests TikTok’s algorithm systematically boosts pro-Mamdani and anti-Cuomo content in NYC’s mayoral race.” – Yehonatan Dodeles

🎯IMPACT: Raises concerns about social media’s role in influencing political opinions and the potential weaponization of algorithms.

IN FULL

Researchers from Spring AI claim that TikTok’s recommendation algorithm is favoring content supporting the Democrats’ socialist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani while suppressing posts that back former governor Andrew Cuomo. The company’s chief technology officer, Yehonatan Dodeles, announced the findings on X, referring to the phenomenon as “algorithmic steering.”

“Our new research suggests TikTok’s algorithm systematically boosts pro-Mamdani and anti-Cuomo content in NYC’s mayoral race,” Dodeles wrote. The researchers identified “Excessive Publicity” videos, which are posts that receive more exposure than they would have organically. About 17 percent of all videos displayed this kind of non-organic boost, according to the report. However, the effect was far more pronounced in political content, where 55 percent of videos were affected. Within that group, most promoted clips were either pro-Mamdani or anti-Cuomo, while pro-Cuomo content was suppressed below the baseline.

“These are preliminary findings and further research should be done, but the implications are huge,” Dodeles said. He warned that algorithmic steering could shape not only what users see but also what they believe, raising concerns about the manipulation of public opinion through social media.

Broader concerns about Chinese interference have been highlighted in recent reports, including Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) findings alleging attempts by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to exploit mail-in ballots during the 2020 U.S. election. Other investigations have documented Beijing’s efforts to influence Western think tanks and policy groups as part of a wider “information-warfare” campaign.

Imagine by Eden, Janine, and Jim.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.