❓WHAT HAPPENED: A proposed deal between U.S.-based BlackRock and China’s CK Hutchison involving the transfer of international ports, including two in Panama, has collapsed amidst pressure from Beijing.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: BlackRock, CK Hutchison, China’s state-owned shipping giant Cosco, and President Donald J. Trump.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The deal collapsed on Monday, impacting 43 ports across 23 countries, including the Panama Canal ports of Balboa and Cristobal.
💬KEY QUOTE: President Trump has previously stated, “China is operating the Panama Canal, and we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama—and we’re taking it back.”
🎯IMPACT: The failed deal raises concerns about U.S. strategic interests in the region.
China is poised to increase its influence over the Panama Canal following the breakdown of a proposed agreement between U.S. investment giant BlackRock and Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison. The collapse of this $23 billion deal, initially met with criticism from Beijing, leaves the future of control over dozens of strategic international ports uncertain, including two positioned at either end of the Panama Canal.
The original agreement would have shifted ownership of 43 ports across 23 countries to a consortium involving BlackRock. Among those were the Balboa and Cristobal ports in Panama, which have been operated by CK Hutchison since 1997.
President Donald J. Trump had praised the collapsed deal, describing it as a step toward curbing China’s presence in the region. Referencing America’s former control over the canal, Trump had said, “China is operating the Panama Canal, and we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama—and we’re taking it back.” The canal was handed over to Panama by the U.S. in 1999 following a 1977 treaty brokered by Democrat former President Jimmy Carter.
Amid rising pressure from Chinese authorities and concerns over a potential anti-monopoly investigation, CK Hutchison announced this week that its exclusive negotiation window with BlackRock had ended. However, the company left the door open for future restructuring of the deal. In a statement, CK Hutchison said it would “remain open to discussions with a view to inviting a major strategic investor from the [People’s Republic of China] to join as a significant member of the consortium.” The firm added that it believed “changes in deal structure and participant makeup are necessary to gain approval from all relevant authorities.”
One analyst, Dane Chamorro of Control Risks, suggested that while China may ultimately be left out of the Panama portion of the port portfolio, it could still walk away with control over many of the other global assets involved. “China will insist this be the quid pro quo: that the other global ports have Cosco participation. And obviously, Cosco is already a major global port holder,” he noted.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.