Monday, January 12, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Doc Who Stabbed ‘Voodoo Doll’ of Trump Gets Powerful FDA Job.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED:  Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, has been appointed Director of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) despite prior anti-Trump comments, including claims he stabbed a “voodoo” doll of the America First leader to “curse” him.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Dr. Vinay Prasad, President Donald J. Trump, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the FDA.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Prasad’s anti-Trump statements were made on his podcast and other media appearances over the last several years.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Who can I curse for the pandemic? I mean, I’m frustrated like a lot of people; I’m annoyed. But who do I curse? And there’s no one to really curse, but I can curse Trump. I have his little statue. I stab him, his little figurette.” — Dr. Vinay Prasad

🎯IMPACT: The public remarks expose a lack of proper vetting for administration officials and potential political bias that has the potential to undermine the Trump administration.

IN FULL

Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and outspoken progressive commentator, has been appointed Director of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). This appointment comes despite prior anti-Trump comments that include claims he stabbed a voodoo doll to “curse” the America First leader.

Nominated in May by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Prasad’s elevation to a key regulatory role comes amid concerns about political bias revealed by journalist Laura Loomer. Prasad has opposed key Trump policies like the Right to Try Act—championed by the President to expand treatment access for terminally ill patients.

Prasad’s podcast, Plenary Session—and other public appearances—provide a record of his hostility toward Trump and the Republican base. On a February 7, 2021, episode, Prasad admitted he “stabbed a Trump voodoo doll to ‘curse’ Trump”.

“Who can I curse for the pandemic? I mean, I’m frustrated like a lot of people; I’m annoyed. But who do I curse? And there’s no one to really curse, but I can curse Trump. I have his little statue. I stab him, his little figurette,” Prasad said, admitting it was voodoo with his guest.

His rhetoric has consistently painted the President in stark terms. On October 3, 2020, he aligned himself with the “Never Trump” movement, declaring, “I hate him too.” Days later, he called Trump “a narcissist” who “uses evil as a tool.” Later the same month, he alleged Trump’s lies “could fill a few 10,000-page volume books.”

His contempt extends beyond Trump to his political supporters. In a November 7, 2020, episode, Prasad described Trump’s base as a “cult” and likened them to “substance abusers” or “criminals.” Expressing disappointment in the closeness of the 2020 election, he called it “a crushing loss for Democrats, for progressives like myself” because he had hoped for a landslide.

In a July 7, 2022, episode of the VPZD Show, Prasad mocked Trump loyalists in the wake of the January 6 Capitol protests, criticizing those who “turn a blind eye for insurrection.”

Prasad has openly identified as a progressive, stating in an October 16, 2021, episode, “I’m on the far left.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Revokes Over 100,000 Visas, Setting All-Time Record.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. State Department revoked over 100,000 foreign visas in 2025, setting an all-time record.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. State Department, foreign nationals, and the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Throughout 2025, across the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Trump administration will continue to put America first and protect our nation from foreign nationals who pose a risk to public safety or national security.” – State Department spokesman Tommy Piggott

🎯IMPACT: Stricter visa standards and increased enforcement of immigration rules under the Trump administration.

IN FULL

The U.S. State Department revoked more than 100,000 foreign visas in 2025, more than doubling the approximately 40,000 visas canceled in 2024 during the final year of former President Joe Biden’s administration, according to department data. The figure represents the highest number of visa revocations ever recorded, following an executive order on enhanced foreign vetting signed by President Donald J. Trump on his first day back in office.

Most of the revocations involved business and tourist visa holders who overstayed their authorized periods of stay. However, the action also affected roughly 8,000 students and 2,500 specialized workers. A State Department spokesman said many of these immigrants had criminal encounters with law enforcement, including arrests or charges for drunk driving, assault, battery, theft, and child abuse.

Among specialized workers, about half of the revocations stemmed from drunk driving arrests, while approximately 30 percent involved assault or unlawful confinement charges. The remaining cases included offenses such as theft, substance abuse, fraud, and embezzlement. Nearly 500 students lost their visas due to drug-related offenses, and hundreds of foreign workers were found to have abused children, according to the spokesman.

In August 2025, the Trump administration announced it would conduct a review of all 55 million foreign nationals holding valid U.S. visas as part of a broader effort to tighten oversight. Tommy Piggott, the State Department’s principal deputy spokesman, said at the time, “The Trump administration will continue to put America first and protect our nation from foreign nationals who pose a risk to public safety or national security.”

The administration also implemented stricter standards for visa eligibility. Officials said consular officers would deny visas to foreign nationals suspected of traveling to the United States to give birth in order to secure citizenship for their children. In guidance issued to U.S. embassies, the department stated, “U.S. consular officers will deny tourist visa applications if they believe the primary purpose of travel is to give birth in the United States to obtain U.S. citizenship for the child. This is not permitted.”

Health-based eligibility standards were expanded as well. New guidance allowed consular officers to consider chronic medical conditions, including obesity and other serious health issues, when determining whether an applicant could become a public charge by relying on taxpayer-funded benefits.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Minnesota Democrats Sue DHS for Upholding Immigration Law.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota’s Democratic political leaders filed a lawsuit on Monday against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), seeking to halt U.S. Immigration and Enforcement (ICE) actions in the state as part of “Operation Metro Surge.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D), St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her (D), ICE agents, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was announced late Monday, January 12, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The unlawful deployment of thousands of armed, masked, and poorly trained federal agents is hurting Minnesota.” — Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison

🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks to halt federal immigration enforcement operations in the Twin Cities, claiming constitutional violations and significant disruption to local communities.

IN FULL

Democrat officials in Minnesota announced they have filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to force the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) “Operation Metro Surge,” which has seen significant U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions in the state. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), alongside Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) and St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her (D), criticized the federal immigration enforcement action, claiming, “The unlawful deployment of thousands of armed, masked, and poorly trained federal agents is hurting Minnesota. People are being racially profiled, harassed, terrorized, and assaulted. Schools have gone into lockdown. Businesses have been forced to close.”

Currently, an estimated 2,000 DHS agents from ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are deployed to the Twin Cities area, with several hundred more expected to bolster their numbers in the coming days. In the lawsuit, Minnesota Democrats contend the federal operation violates the First and Tenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The filing also claims the immigration enforcement action represents a disruption of the balance of power between federal and state officials, and seeks a temporary, state-wide, restraining order against further DHS actions.

The lawsuit follows the fatal shooting of anti-ICE activist Renee Nicole Good last week after she attempted to run over an ICE agent. Notably, the large-scale federal immigration enforcement operation follows widespread evidence of mass social services fraud in Minnesota tied to the state’s Somali immigrant community.

Late last month, U.S. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) announced that his committee had launched an investigation into Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) and Ellison over allegations of mismanagement resulting in fraud and accusations of evidence destruction. A number of state employee whistleblowers have come forward stating that the Walz administration was aware of the Somali-linked fraud as early as 2019 but declined to act against it out of fear of being perceived as racist and alienating Somali voters.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Texas Is Sending Voter Data to the DOJ for Auditing.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) announced the state sent its voter rolls to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to check for potential ineligible registrations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, and the DOJ.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on Monday; with eligibility reviews to occur across all 254 counties in Texas.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We want our voter rolls to be checked for potential ineligible registrations. Only US citizens can vote in Texas.” – Gov. Abbott

🎯IMPACT: Over 2,700 possible illegal immigrants were flagged as registered voters, prompting a statewide eligibility review.

IN FULL

Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) confirmed on Monday that the state had sent its voter rolls to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to ensure that only eligible voters are registered. Abbott shared the news on X (formerly Twitter), emphasizing that only American citizens are allowed to vote in Texas—and in American federal elections on the whole.

“We want our voter rolls to be checked for potential ineligible registrations. Only U.S. citizens can vote in Texas,” Abbott stated. The move follows an October announcement by Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, who revealed that a cross-check of voter records had identified over 2,700 possible illegal immigrants registered to vote, leading to a review across all 254 counties in the state.

The Trump administration has increasingly pushed states to ensure voter roll compliance, asserting that maintaining accurate records is critical for public trust in election outcomes. However, Democrat-controlled states have largely attempted to resist the effort, claiming spuriously that sharing voter registration data with the DOJ could lead to privacy issues and the risk of eligible voters being improperly purged from the rolls.

Earlier this month, Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin revealed that legal action could be taken against states that comply with the DOJ’s requests. Meanwhile, Texas is among at least seven states that have provided voter information to federal authorities. Meanwhile, late last year, the DOJ launched litigation against six Democrat-led states, including Delaware, Maryland, and Washington, for refusing to share their voter registration rolls, accusing them of violating federal election law.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Seditious’ Senator Mark Kelly Just Filed a Lawsuit Against Pete Hegseth, Here’s Why:

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) is suing the War Department and War Secretary Pete Hegseth over actions to demote him and cut his retirement pay.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sen. Mark Kelly, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Navy, the Department of War, and Navy Secretary John Phelan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in Washington, D.C., with recent actions stemming from a November video released by Kelly and fellow Democrats.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly—and five other members of Congress—released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline.” — Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The Department of War contends that Kelly’s current status as a U.S. senator does not exempt him from accountability.

IN FULL

U.S. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) filed a federal lawsuit on Monday against the Department of War and War Secretary Pete Hegseth over action to demote him and cut his retirement pay after Kelly urged military service members to “refuse illegal orders” in a video with other Democratic lawmakers. Notably, neither Kelly—a retired U.S. Navy officer—nor his colleagues actually defined what would constitute an “illegal order,” spurring allegations that the video was intended to encourage unlawful dissent in the military.

Filed in Washington, D.C., the lawsuit names Sec. Hegseth, the Department of War, the U.S. Navy, and Navy Secretary John Phelan as defendants. Sen. Kelly claims these actions are politically motivated and tied to a feud with the Trump administration.

In November last year, Kelly joined five other Democratic lawmakers, dubbed the “Seditious Six,” in a video telling service members that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders. Following this, Hegseth issued a letter censuring Kelly, stating that his remarks undermined good order and discipline within the military.

“Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly—and five other members of Congress—released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline,” Hegseth said earlier this month, adding: “The Department of War—and the American people—expect justice.” The Department of War clarified that Kelly’s current status as a U.S. senator does not exempt him from accountability. Further violations could lead to additional actions.

Following the formal censure in early January, Kelly was given 30 days to respond, prompting the current lawsuit.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Florida Lt. Gov Jay Collins Enters Wide-Open GOP Primary for Governor.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Florida Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins (R) announced his candidacy for governor on Monday, joining the race to succeed Governor Ron DeSantis (R), who is term-limited.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, Gov. Ron DeSantis, U.S. Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL), former Florida House Republican Speaker Paul Renner, and James Fishback.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on Monday; the Florida gubernatorial election is in November 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m running for Governor to keep Florida strong and to build on the legacy of leadership that has made our state the model for the nation.” – Jay Collins

🎯IMPACT: Collins enters a competitive GOP primary field, vowing to continue DeSantis’ legacy and back President Donald J. Trump’s America First agenda.

IN FULL

Florida Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins (R) has officially announced his candidacy for governor, entering the race to replace current Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL), who is term-limited. Collins, a former Green Beret, emphasized his leadership experience in his announcement.

“I’m running for Governor because leadership is forged under pressure, not in soundbites. I served over 23 years in the United States military, mainly as a Green Beret, where accountability is real, decisions have consequences, and service comes before self,” Collins said in a statement, adding: “That experience shaped how I lead and why I believe public office is a public trust.”

Collins, who was appointed lieutenant governor by DeSantis in August, referred to his partnership with the current governor in advancing a “bold, conservative agenda.” He stated, “In the Legislature and as Lieutenant Governor, I’ve worked alongside Governor Ron DeSantis to deliver results and advance a bold, conservative agenda. I did not come to chase headlines. I came to deliver results.”

The GOP primary for the gubernatorial race is shaping up to be competitive, with other contenders including Trump-backed U.S. Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL), former Florida House Republican Speaker Paul Renner, and former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) advisor James Fishback. Collins also expressed his intent to be a “strong partner” for President Donald J. Trump, aligning his platform with the America First agenda.

“As Governor, I will be a strong partner to President Trump in fighting for secure borders, a strong economy, and an America First agenda that puts families and freedom first. This moment demands discipline, courage, and leaders willing to do what is right, even when it is hard. I am ready to lead. I am ready to Keep Florida Strong!” Collins declared.

When his appointment as Lieutenant Governor was announced, Collins faced backlash over allegations that a nonprofit group he had worked with since 2018 had mandated diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and requirements for employees and contractors, with Governor DeSantis defending him against accusations that he is “woke.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Is Meeting the Venezuelan Opposition Leader This Week.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, is set to meet with President Donald J. Trump at the White House on Thursday.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, María Corina Machado, and Venezuelans.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at the White House, following the U.S. military operation to remove Marxist narco-dictator Nicolás Maduro from power.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I certainly would love to be able to personally tell him that we believe—the Venezuelan people, because this is a prize of the Venezuelan people—certainly want to, to give it to him and share it with him.” — María Corina Machado on sharing her Nobel Prize with President Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The U.S. remains heavily involved in Venezuela’s oil market and its democratic transition, with Machado expressing admiration for Trump’s leadership.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump is set to meet with Venezuela’s top opposition leader, María Corina Machado, on Thursday at the White House, according to an administration official. The meeting follows the U.S.-led military operation that removed former Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, who now faces narco-terrorism charges in the United States.

Machado—the recipient of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize—is expected to present her vision for Venezuela’s future. However, President Trump has recently expressed skepticism as to whether Machado will be widely accepted by the South American nation’s populace, stating, “She doesn’t have the support within, or the respect within, the country. She’s a very nice woman, but she doesn’t have the respect.”

Despite this, Machado has routinely praised Trump and the U.S. military for their actions against Maduro and his regime. She has recently gone so far as to suggest that her Nobel Peace Prize should be shared with Trump, stating, “I certainly would love to be able to personally tell him that we believe—the Venezuelan people, because this is a prize of the Venezuelan people—certainly want to… give it to him and share it with him.” She went on to describe Trump’s actions as “historic” and a major step toward a democratic transition.

Currently, the United States has taken a significant role in Venezuela’s affairs, particularly in its oil and gas industries, and has stated that the interim government led by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez is cooperating with American officials. The National Pulse reported last Friday that President Trump held a high-level meeting with U.S. oil and gas executives regarding the future of Venezuela’s energy industry and their commitments to invest in the country’s energy infrastructure.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Biden Judge Blocks Trump’s Order Barring Late Mail-In Ballots.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge blocked parts of President Donald J. Trump’s election reform executive order, including a provision setting Election Day as the deadline for mail-in votes.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, U.S. District Court Judge John H. Chun, Washington and Oregon state officials, and White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Friday in Washington State by Judge Chun, a Biden appointee.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Constitution assigns the states all authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of elections,” wrote Judge Chun in his ruling.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling limits the President’s power to impose changes on state election processes and is expected to be appealed by the Trump administration.

IN FULL

A federal judge in Washington State has issued an order blocking, in part, President Donald J. Trump‘s Executive Order enacting election integrity reforms. Late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge John H. Chun—a Joe Biden appointee—ruled that President Trump could not mandate Election Day as the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots, a key provision of the executive order issued in March.

The ruling comes after Washington and Oregon filed a lawsuit in April, arguing that the executive order violated the U.S. Constitution. Judge Chun stated in his 75-page decision that President Trump lacks the constitutional authority to impose such changes on state election processes. “The Constitution assigns the states all authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of elections,” Chun wrote, adding that the President’s authority to establish a national ballot-receipt deadline does not exist under the Constitution.

Trump’s March Executive Order also sought to withhold funding from states that do not require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote. This provision was similarly blocked by the court. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown (D) called the ruling “a huge victory for voters in Washington and Oregon, and for the rule of law.”

President Trump has consistently criticized mail-in ballots as vulnerable to fraud. On Truth Social, Trump previously announced plans to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines, stating, “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.”

The White House has indicated that it will challenge the ruling, with Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson stating, “President Trump cares deeply about the integrity of our elections and his executive order takes lawful actions to ensure election security. This is not the final say on the matter, and the administration expects ultimate victory on the issue.” In November, the U.S. Supreme Court took up a separate case on the legality of accepting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, with oral arguments and a ruling expected sometime this year.

Image via League of Women Voters of California.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump’s FCC Closes Loophole Allowing Criminal Access to High-End Burner Phones.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday a significant change to a 2007 phone unlocking rule, which it says has inadvertently aided criminal enterprises that wish to use higher-end devices as difficult-to-trace burner phones.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The FCC, Verizon, TracFone, and criminal organizations, including drug cartels.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The rule change was announced on Monday, January 12, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Sophisticated criminal networks have exploited the FCC’s handset unlocking policies to carry out criminal acts—including transnational handset trafficking schemes and facilitating broader criminal enterprises like drug running and human smuggling.” — FCC Chairman Brendan Carr

🎯IMPACT: The FCC contends the rule change reduces access to difficult-to-trace “burner” style high-end phones for criminal operations.

IN FULL

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday a significant change to a 2007 phone unlocking rule, which it says has inadvertently aided criminal enterprises that wish to use higher-end devices as difficult-to-trace burner phones. According to the FCC, the nearly two-decade-old phone unlocking policy stipulates that Verizon phones—specifically—must become unlockable from the carrier no more than 60 days after activation. For other cellular carriers, their devices had to be configured so that consumers could unlock them after one year.

Federal officials contend that the significantly shorter unlocking timeline for Verizon—along with its acquisition of prepaid and no-contract mobile virtual network operator TracFone Wireless—created a perverse incentive for criminal elements to target Verizon stores to steal higher-end phones. “Sophisticated criminal networks have exploited the FCC’s handset unlocking policies to carry out criminal acts—including transnational handset trafficking schemes and facilitating broader criminal enterprises like drug running and human smuggling,” FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said regarding the updated FCC rule. He continued, “By waiving a regulation that incentivized bad actors to target one particular carrier’s handsets for theft, we now have a uniform industry standard that can help stem the flow of handsets into the black market.”

Under the new waiver order, Verizon will be brought into alignment with the Cellular Telephone Industries Association (CTIA) Consumer Code for Wireless Service, established in 2013. The FCC contends this will better help reduce drug cartels and other criminal operations’ access to unlocked and difficult-to-trace “burner” style phones.

“Due to its unique unlocking responsibility, Verizon’s unlocked handsets have too often been effectively stolen and resold on the black market, commanding premium prices on the dark web, particularly in countries like Russia, China, and Cuba,” the FCC contends, adding, “The record demonstrates that the 60-day device locking period is insufficient for the company to effectively detect fraud before unlocking takes place… Time and again, federal and state law enforcement has investigated and prosecuted transnational handset trafficking schemes, finding they facilitate broader criminal enterprises like drug and human smuggling.”

The move by the FCC comes as the Trump administration continues to ramp up operations against Central and South American drug cartels and criminal illegal immigrant gangs operating within the United States. Notably, Verizon supports the FCC action, with Kathy Grillo, Senior Vice President of Public Policy, stating, “The FCC’s action will end bad actors’ ability to exploit the FCC’s unlocking rules to profit from easier access to expensive, heavily-subsidized devices in the U.S. that they traffic and sell to other parts of the world.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU Wants ‘Farage Clause’ to Punish Britain If Reform Party Wins Power and Challenges Brussels.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) is reportedly demanding a “Farage clause” in a so-called Brexit reset deal being negotiated by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, which would impose a financial penalty if a future government headed by Brexit champion Nigel Farage withdraws from the agreement.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The EU, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and Nigel Farage.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Negotiations between Starmer and the EU are ongoing in Europe, with implications for the next British general election and beyond.

💬KEY QUOTE: “No Parliament may bind its successor and we will not honour any clause. If Starmer signs this, it’s a democratic outrage.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: Critics argue the clause undermines British sovereignty, with Reform promising to overturn any such agreement if elected.

IN FULL

The European Union (EU) is said to be demanding a so-called “Farage clause” in its ongoing negotiations for a Brexit “reset” with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who previously campaigned against Brexit and in favor of a second referendum to overturn it. The “Farage clause” would require British taxpayers to pay substantial financial compensation if a future government, possibly headed by Brexit champion Nigel Farage, were to withdraw from any proposed deal.

Reports indicate that Brussels views the clause as a “safety provision to provide stability and a deterrent for Farage and Co,” with one unnamed EU diplomat telling British press that “The EU wants an agreement long-term and not only until 2029, should a change happen at the next election.” Notably, Britain’s next general election must be held no later than 2029, with recent polls consistently showing Nigel Farage’s Reform Party in first place.

Prime Minister Starmer is pursuing closer “alignment” with the EU in sectors including agriculture, food production, and energy, which would effectively mean handing over much of the control over the regulation of these sectors to EU control. Farage has condemned this approach of undoing Britain’s separation from the EU piecemeal as a “Brexit betrayal,” effectively handing sovereignty back to the EU and subjecting the country to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

Farage has pledged to terminate any agreement with the EU signed by Starmer if Reform gains power. In response to reports that the EU is seeking to make this prohibitively expensive, Farage declared, “No Parliament may bind its successor and we will not honour any clause. If Starmer signs this, it’s a democratic outrage.”

Since Britain voted to leave the EU in 2016, a British political class and civil service largely opposed to cutting ties with the bloc has repeatedly sabotaged Brexit. The exit deal currently in place was negotiated largely by former Prime Minister Theresa May, who campaigned against Brexit, and civil servant Olly Robbins, who previously headed a club dedicated to transforming the EU into a federal union along the lines of the United States, with its member states giving up even more sovereignty. May’s successor, Boris Johnson, made only cosmetic changes to her deal, retaining contentious provisions such as an agreement to remain subject to the European Court of Human Rights, and to leave Northern Ireland effectively still inside the EU for most purposes.

Image by Owain.davies.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Support Floods In for ICE Agent After Minneapolis Shooting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Jonathan Ross, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who fatally shot anti-ICE agitator Renee Nicole Good when she attempted to run him over with her SUV, has raised $350,000 for his legal defense fund.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Renee Nicole Good and ICE agent Jonathan Ross.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The shooting occurred in Minneapolis, Minnesota, last Wednesday morning, sparking violent protests over the weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am a big believer in our legal principle that one is innocent until proven guilty.” – Bill Ackman

🎯IMPACT: Protests erupted nationwide, and funding campaigns have been launched for both Good’s family and Ross’s legal defense.

IN FULL

Jonathan Ross, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who fatally shot anti-ICE agitator Renee Nicole Good when she attempted to run him over with her SUV, has raised $350,000 for his legal defense fund. The new high mark comes as hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman announced he has contributed $10,000 to Ross’s defense, stating, “I am a big believer in our legal principle that one is innocent until proven guilty.”

Ackman also expressed that he would contribute to the fundraiser for the family of Good, but noted the account had already closed after raising $1.5 million. Last Wednesday, Good was shot and killed after using her vehicle, at the admitted encouragement of her female partner, Rebecca Good, to block and harass federal law enforcement officers in Minneapolis, Minnesota. After being given a lawful order to stop and exit the vehicle, Renee Good accelerated forward toward Ross, prompting the ICE agent to fire upon her.

The corporate media at first attempted to portray Renee Good as merely a scared woman who was unaffiliated with the protests. However, numerous videos taken from the protest leading up to the shooting have subsequently shown Renee and Rebecca Good engaging in sustained interference against federal law enforcement.

Good’s death sparked a surge in violent anti-ICE protests in Minnesota, prompting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to announce the deployment of additional federal officers to the state to ensure the safety of ICE agents and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers already on site. This past weekend saw additional protests around the country, including in Washington, D.C., New York, and Seattle.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.