❓WHAT HAPPENED: Kim Davis, a former Kentucky clerk, has filed a petition to the Supreme Court arguing that her First Amendment rights protect her from liability for denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kim Davis, her attorney Mathew Staver, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Davis’s petition was filed last month, with the case potentially being heard by the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
💬KEY QUOTE: “If there ever was a case of exceptional importance… this should be it.” – Mathew Staver
🎯IMPACT: If accepted, this case could challenge the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky clerk who became widely known in 2015 for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses due to her religious beliefs, has taken her case to the Supreme Court. Filed last month, her petition argues that the First Amendment’s protection of religious freedom should shield her from personal liability in denying the licenses.
Davis’s legal team, led by attorney Mathew Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, is also challenging the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which legalized same-sex marriage across the United States. In the petition, Staver described the ruling as “egregiously wrong” and referred to former Justice Anthony Kennedy‘s majority opinion as “legal fiction.”
“The mistake must be corrected,” Staver wrote, emphasizing the broad implications of the case. He continued, “If there ever was a case of exceptional importance, the first individual in the Republic’s history who was jailed for following her religious convictions regarding the historic definition of marriage, this should be it.”
“I’m hoping that we’ll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis, but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks in Kentucky is extended to everyone across the country, whether they’re a clerk or not,” Staver added.
Davis’s case not only seeks to clear her name but also aims to revisit and potentially overturn the landmark pro same-sex marriage ruling issued during the Obama-Biden administration. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, it would mark the first significant challenge to the Obergefell decision.
The outcome could have far-reaching consequences for both religious liberty and the legal definition of marriage in the United States. Observers are now waiting to see if the Supreme Court will take up the case.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.