Tuesday, November 4, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump DOJ Sues Democrat States for Withholding Voter Data.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed lawsuits against Oregon and Maine to obtain sensitive voter registration data, including partial Social Security numbers, after the states refused to comply with federal requests.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The DOJ, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read (D), Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D), and the DOJ Civil Rights Division’s Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuits were announced Tuesday, targeting Democrat-led states Oregon and Maine.

💬KEY QUOTE: “States simply cannot pick and choose which federal laws they will comply with.” — Harmeet Dhillon

🎯IMPACT: The lawsuits highlight ongoing Democrat efforts to resist and undermine President Donald J. Trump’s election integrity initiatives.

IN FULL

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced late Tuesday that it filed lawsuits against Oregon and Maine after the states refused to comply with requests for voter registration lists. These lawsuits mark the first legal actions against states resisting such requests.

“States simply cannot pick and choose which federal laws they will comply with,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, when announcing the legal action. She added: “American citizens have a right to feel confident in the integrity of our electoral process, and the refusal of certain states to protect their citizens against vote dilution will result in legal consequences.”

The DOJ argues the data is necessary to ensure compliance with federal voter registration maintenance laws. Further, the department alleges that Oregon and Maine election officials have failed to provide adequate answers and sufficient evidence to determine whether they’re acting in accordance with federal election law.

Responding to the lawsuits, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read (D) stated, “If the President wants to use the DOJ to go after his political opponents and undermine our elections, I look forward to seeing them in court.” Similarly, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) claimed her office is concerned about voter data security, calling the DOJ’s actions a “fishing expedition.”

Election officials in other states have also resisted similar requests from the DOJ, citing privacy and security concerns. It remains unclear whether the DOJ will pursue legal action against additional states that have declined to provide voter data.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

California to Decide Fate of Prop 50 and Potentially the U.S. House Majority.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Californians are set to vote on Proposition 50, a measure that would end the state’s independent redistricting commission and allow the Democrat-dominated legislature to redraw congressional districts to create five additional Democratic seats.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA), former President Barack Obama, and President Donald J. Trump have all spoken about or influenced the context surrounding Proposition 50.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The vote will take place on Tuesday across California.

💬KEY QUOTE: “California, the whole nation is counting on you. Democracy is on the ballot.” – Barack Obama

🎯IMPACT: If passed, the measure could shift the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives by adding five Democratic congressional seats.

IN FULL

The fate of the U.S. House Republican majority could be decided on Tuesday, with California voters heading to the polls to vote on Proposition 50. If approved, the ballot measure would temporarily suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission and allow the legislature to redraw congressional districts, potentially creating five additional Democratic seats.

The effort has been framed as a response to Texas’s redistricting, which created new Republican-leaning districts, at the urging of President Donald J. Trump. California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has positioned Prop 50 as a way to counter Trump, stating it will combat “efforts to undermine the democratic process.”

Prominent Democrats, including Barack Obama, have endorsed the measure. In an ad, Obama urged voters to approve the proposition, saying, “California, the whole nation is counting on you. Democracy is on the ballot.” Polls indicate strong support, with a CBS News survey showing 62 percent of likely voters in favor.

However, Republicans contend the redistricting efforts they’ve undertaken in Texas and other states—including North Carolina—are in response to egregious errors with the 2020 Census, which granted several blue states more congressional representation than they should actually have. Notably, there are significant discrepancies between New York’s current population and the one reported to the Census. Additionally, inclusion of illegal immigrants, Republicans contend, further skews the census data.

Ahead of the election, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced plans to deploy federal election observers across several California counties to ensure transparency and compliance with federal laws.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Bomb Threats Disrupt Voting at Multiple Polling Stations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Bomb threats were made at schools and polling locations across New Jersey, prompting closures and relocations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: New Jersey voters, law enforcement, and state officials, including Attorney General Matthew Platkin (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday in New Jersey, across at least seven counties, including Bergen, Essex, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Passaic.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Voters should continue to have confidence that they can cast their ballot without fear of intimidation, and we will continue to work tirelessly to ensure a free, fair, and secure election.” – Matthew Platkin

🎯IMPACT: Temporary closures and relocations of polling stations, with law enforcement ensuring voter safety.

IN FULL

Several schools and polling places across New Jersey were disrupted by bomb threats during today’s gubernatorial elections, forcing temporary closures and relocations in at least seven counties, including Bergen, Essex, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Passaic. Other polling places across the state remain unaffected.

In Paterson, School 2 and School 10 were closed after threats were received. Hackensack High School was also targeted, prompting a K9 sweep before reopening around 7:30 AM. Ridgewood authorities reported a threat at Somerville Elementary School, leading to the closure of the district’s public schools for the day, though voting continued at the building. In Middlesex County, Avanel Middle School was shut down due to what officials described as an “active law enforcement investigation,” and voters were redirected to Woodbine Avenue Elementary School. Lake Como and Passaic also reported similar incidents, with Passaic Mayor Hector Lora confirming threats in his city.

Despite the disruptions, other polling locations across the state continued to operate as scheduled. Authorities quickly secured affected sites, allowing some to reopen once law enforcement determined they were safe. New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin urged residents to remain confident in the state’s election process, saying, “Voters should continue to have confidence that they can cast their ballot without fear of intimidation, and we will continue to work tirelessly to ensure a free, fair, and secure election. Make no mistake: We will not tolerate any attempts to interfere with our elections, and we will swiftly hold accountable anyone who seeks to interfere with the safety or security of our electoral process.”

Concerns about election security have also surfaced in other states. Last year in Arizona, a Democrat election worker in Maricopa County was arrested after allegedly stealing a security fob and keys used for ballot tabulation machines. County officials said all equipment connected to the incident was immediately reprogrammed and retested to ensure the integrity of the elections.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Comey Anticipated Clinton Win, Was Briefed on Media Leak Operation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal prosecutors revealed personal emails showing former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey expected to work for Hillary Clinton and was aware of efforts to provide information anonymously to the media before the 2016 election.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI special government employee Dan Richman, acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, Deputy Tyler Lemmons, and Hillary Clinton.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The emails and events occurred in 2016, with new details revealed in a court filing on Monday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Well done my friend. Who knew this would. E so uh fun [sic].” — James Comey

🎯IMPACT: The emails and court filing raise serious questions about Comey’s truthfulness in testimony to Congress and his role in media leaks concerning high-profile cases.

IN FULL

Former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey was anticipating that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 presidential election, according to personal emails and other documents presented by federal prosecutors on Monday. In addition, Comey had an FBI employee assigned to keep him informed on media leak efforts to help push the election in Clinton’s favor.

“Well done my friend. Who knew this would. E so uh fun [sic],” Comey wrote in a November 2016 email. Comey had just been briefed by former FBI special government employee Dan Richman, during which the two discussed efforts to provide guidance to The New York Times on how best to cover the issue of Clinton’s private server and retention of classified information.

“Consistent with the above-described correspondence, Richman corresponded extensively with members of the media regarding or on behalf of the defendant, including in an anonymous capacity,” the court filing stated. Comey is charged with making false statements and obstructing Congress. This specifically involves statements made during testimony in 2020 when he specifically denied he approved anonymous leaks from the FBI to the media regarding Clinton’s private server and the promotion of the Russia collusion hoax targeting President Donald J. Trump

The filing also revealed that prosecutors have handwritten notes, hidden in a secret FBI room, indicating Comey was aware of intelligence in 2016 suggesting Clinton approved a plan to link Trump to Russian interference. Despite Comey’s 2020 testimony claiming no recollection of such intelligence, his notes from September 26, 2016, explicitly read: “HRC plan to tie Trump.”

Image by Paul Morigi Photography.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, Architect of Disastrous U.S. Invasion of Iraq, Dies at 84.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Former Vice President Dick Cheney has passed away at the age of 84 due to complications from pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Dick Cheney, his family, and political figures such as former President George W. Bush and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Cheney passed away on Monday evening, as announced by his family on Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing.” – Cheney Family Statement

🎯IMPACT: Cheney’s legacy as a powerful political figure and his controversial role in U.S. foreign policy will continue to shape discussions for years to come.

IN FULL

Former Vice President Richard B. “Dick” Cheney passed away at the age of 84 due to complications from pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease, his family confirmed in a statement on Tuesday. Cheney, who served as vice president from 2001 to 2009 under George W. Bush, was a key figure in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the early 21st century, having an especially detrimental impact on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

The Cheney family described him as “a great and good man” who inspired his family to love the country and embrace values such as courage and kindness. “Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing,” the family said in a statement. Cheney held several prominent roles throughout his career, including White House Chief of Staff, Congressman from Wyoming, and Secretary of Defense, before becoming Vice President.

During his tenure, Cheney was a pivotal advocate for the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on suspected terrorists, making him a controversial figure in American politics. His influence earned him the reputation of being “the most powerful vice president in history.”

Tributes have poured in from across the political spectrum. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) remarked, “My prayers are [with] the Cheney family. Dick served our country [with] distinction in various roles over many decades.” Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) called Cheney “a giant in American politics” whose impact will endure.

Cheney experienced significant health issues throughout his life, including five heart attacks and a heart transplant in 2012. His daughter Liz Cheney, a former congresswoman for Wyoming, is one of the staunchest anti-Trump Republicans. Liz Cheney is credibly accused of tampering with witness testimony on the Democrat January 6 Committee in an effort to prevent President Trump from running for reelection and eventually endorsed—along with her father—Democrat candidate Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential race.

Image by World Economic Forum swiss-image.ch/Remy Steinegger.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tommy Robinson Acquitted of Terror Charge, Judge Says Prosecution Likely Political.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: British citizen journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson was found not guilty of failing to comply with dubious counter-terrorism orders after being stopped at the Channel Tunnel in 2024.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tommy Robinson, Judge Sam Goozee, and British border police.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The stop occurred in 2024 at the Channel Tunnel, with the verdict delivered on a Friday morning in court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I cannot put out of my mind that it was actually what you stood for and your political beliefs that acted for the principle reason for this stop.” – Judge Sam Goozee

🎯IMPACT: The case raises questions about the use of counter-terrorism laws and their application to politically active individuals.

IN FULL

British citizen journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson has been found not guilty after being charged with failing to comply with dubious counter-terrorism orders. The charges stemmed from a 2024 incident where Robinson was stopped by police at the Channel Tunnel while traveling to Spain and demanded access to his phone under counter-terrorism powers, with Robinson refusing to unlock it on the basis that he was protecting journalistic sources.

“I find it concerning that the officers have no real recollection of questions asked of you… The officer also appeared confused about his [counter-terrorism] powers,” Judge Sam Goozee said, suggesting that the stop appeared to be motivated by Robinson’s political beliefs rather than legitimate suspicion. “I cannot put out of my mind that it was actually what you stood for and your political beliefs that acted for the principle reason for this stop,” he said.

“[T]he prosecution has… failed to satisfy me so I am sure there was no unlawful discrimination. Based on that, if the decision to stop and examine you was not in accordance with the statutory purpose, it is not lawful and I cannot convict you of an offence… I therefore find you not guilty,” he told Robinson, known mainly for exposing British state failures to protect mostly working-class white girls from mostly Muslim, South Asian heritage grooming gangs.

This is not the first case against Robinson to fail in court. An attempt to prosecute him for refusing to leave a protest against anti-Semitism on the basis that his mere presence was distressing people collapsed because the police order he defied was not lawful.

Image by Rose Morelli.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Soros Org Document Calls on Public to ‘Cede Part of Their Sovereignty’ to ‘Political Elite.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A document from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF) organization suggests a shift in democratic processes, advocating for an elite to address social issues.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sonja Licht, who authored the document, and Jennica “DataRepublican” Pounds, a Utah software engineer who highlighted the document on social media.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The document was noted in a recent post on X (formerly Twitter) by Pounds.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate… can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections—will be able to justify public trust and spearhead… our struggle to survive.” – Sonja Licht

🎯IMPACT: The proposal has sparked concerns about the future of democratic processes and popular sovereignty.

IN FULL

Jennica Pounds, a software engineer from Utah, recently shared a concerning excerpt from an Open Society Foundations (OSF) document on her @DataRepublican X (formerly Twitter) account. The document discusses addressing public “mistrust” of liberal democracy by having a “responsible, courageous elite” claim a portion of the people’s sovereignty.

The document suggests that the public would cede part of their sovereignty to this “elite” for a time after elections, a proposal that Pounds described as “mask off” and alarming. “The proposed solution to the public’s distrust in democracy… is less democracy. An unelected ‘elite’ to whom the public should cede sovereignty,” Pounds noted, adding: “Abolish democracy to save democracy. This kind of thinking is what we’re up against.”

OSF is the linchpin of liberal plutocrat George Soros’s nonprofit network. Document author Sonja Licht, a former OSF leader, is not a fringe figure, having received high civilian honors from several countries, including Italy, France, and Germany, for her work on the concept of democracy and human rights. She also has links to USAID.

Licht’s proposal, which she describes as a “utopia,” has sparked significant debate and concern online. Critics argue that the idea of an unelected elite holding sway over democratic processes challenges the very foundations of democracy.

Image via World Economic Forum/swiss-image.ch/Sebastian Derungs.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mails.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Nineteen Arrested in Another Grooming Gang Scandal.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Nineteen men were arrested in connection with historic child sexual abuse allegations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: West Yorkshire Police, five alleged victims, and the 19 arrested suspects.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Arrests were made in England last month across Kirklees, Calderdale, Bradford, and areas outside the force’s jurisdiction. Alleged offences occurred between 2000 and 2009, primarily in Kirklees.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Safeguarding children and bringing to justice those involved in child sexual abuse remains a key focus for West Yorkshire Police.” – Detective Chief Inspector Rob Stevens

🎯IMPACT: The investigation highlights ongoing efforts to address both recent and historic child sexual abuse cases in West Yorkshire.

IN FULL

England’s West Yorkshire Police force has arrested 19 men as part of a major investigation into historic child sexual abuse across several districts. The arrests were made last month at addresses in Kirklees, Calderdale, Bradford, and outside the force’s area. The men are facing charges that include rape, sexual assault, and human trafficking. According to police, five women have come forward alleging that they were raped, trafficked, and abused as children between 2000 and 2009, with most of the offences said to have taken place in the Kirklees area.

Detective Chief Inspector Rob Stevens, who is leading the investigation, described the alleged crimes as “abhorrent and heinous.” He said: “Safeguarding children and bringing to justice those involved in child sexual abuse remains a key focus for West Yorkshire Police, and this large-scale enquiry demonstrates our ongoing commitment to investigating both current and non-recent sexual offences.”

Stevens urged victims of abuse to come forward, assuring them: “Please be assured that you will be listened to, taken seriously, and supported by professionals with experience of dealing with these kinds of offences.” Historically, West Midlands Police and other British police forces and authorities badly failed grooming gang victims, leaving them “at the mercy” of predators.

The arrests come amid continuing scrutiny of grooming gangs, which are disproportionately Muslim and Pakistani by background, victimizing mostly white, working-class girls. Notably, no information on the identity of the 19 arrested men has been released as of the time of publication.

In recent years, a series of investigations exposed widespread failures by authorities to prevent and respond to organized child sexual exploitation, with some cases involving hundreds of victims. Reports have highlighted how, in towns such as Rotherham and Telford, police and local councils ignored or downplayed abuse due to fears of being labelled racist or damaging so-called “community relations.”

According to recent government reviews, group-based child sexual exploitation remains a significant national issue. A 2025 report found that many offences went unrecorded or were inadequately investigated for years, leaving victims without justice. In some instances, police officers themselves were accused of participating in or covering up abuse. The scandal has led to renewed calls for accountability, with an official inquiry being organized but already running into problems, with victims saying they are being silenced.

Image by Basher Eyre.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Asylum Claims Surge to Highest Number Ever in Britain.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Britain recorded 108,000 asylum applications in 2024, marking the highest number ever, according to new Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour government, Border Force personnel, and asylum seekers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The data covers 2024, with the United Kingdom surpassing previous records and facing increased crossings of the English Channel by boat migrants.

🎯IMPACT: The figures add to the ongoing migration crisis in Britain, with rising crossings and public demand for stricter deportation measures.

IN FULL

Britain has recorded the highest number of asylum claims in Europe, as new figures reveal a record 108,000 applications were made in 2024. The data, released by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), shows a 28 percent increase from the previous year’s 84,000, marking the largest total ever documented in the United Kingdom. The previous peak was in 2002, when 103,000 people sought asylum.

While Britain’s numbers surged, several European neighbours experienced declines. Germany, traditionally one of the largest destinations for asylum seekers, saw applications fall by nearly 100,000 to around 230,000. France also reported a decrease, while Spain and Italy received 164,000 and 151,000 claims, respectively. Although both totals were higher than Britain’s in absolute terms, their growth rates were far lower.

The OECD also reported around 44,000 unauthorised attempts to enter the United Kingdom in 2024, mostly through small boat crossings of the English Channel. That figure was up from 37,000 in 2023. Pakistani nationals accounted for the largest group of asylum seekers, submitting more than 10,000 applications, followed by Afghans and Iranians, who each filed over 8,000 claims.

The surge in migration has intensified pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s leftist Labour government, which faces growing criticism over its handling of border control. The situation has worsened over 2025, with more than 35,000 migrants crossing the Channel, a 25 percent rise compared to the same period last year.

Broader migration trends continue to stir public concern. Former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick warned in 2024 that “mass immigration is crushing national prosperity, not raising it,” stressing that the pace of arrivals is placing a serious strain on housing and public services. Official data indicate that Britain’s population grew by more than 750,000 in the year to mid-2024, with net migration accounting for almost all of that increase.

The recent appointment of far-left Muslim Shabana Mahmood as Home Secretary, roughly equivalent to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary, in September 2025 has also drawn attention. Her promotion places her in charge of border security and migration policy, though some commentators have described her as a figure whose priorities may focus more on leftist ideas like “social justice” than immigration enforcement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Judge Sets Trial for Ex-DOJ Staffer Who Pelted CBP Agent With Sandwich: ‘Simplest Case in the World.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Sean Charles Dunn is on trial for assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald J. Trump’s law-enforcement surge in Washington, D.C.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former Department of Justice (DOJ) staffer Sean Charles Dunn, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, and federal law enforcement agents.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Jury selection began Monday, November 1, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s the simplest case in the world.”  — Judge Carl Nichols

🎯IMPACT: Federal prosecutors are now attempting to secure a conviction, despite a D.C. grand jury’s earlier refusal to indict Dunn on felony charges.

IN FULL

Jury selection began Monday in the trial of Sean Charles Dunn for assaulting a federal Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent by throwing a sandwich in the officer’s face in protest of President Donald J. Trump’s cime crackdown in Washington, D.C. Federal prosecutors are now attempting to secure a conviction, despite a D.C. grand jury’s earlier refusal to indict Dunn on felony charges.

The incident occurred on August 10, 2023, outside a nightclub hosting “Latin Night,” where Dunn was recorded throwing a “submarine-style sandwich” at a CBP agent. The video, which went viral, showed Dunn calling the agents “fascists” and “racists” before throwing the sandwich and yelling, “Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!”

U.S. District Court Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, acknowledged the simplicity of the case, stating it should last no more than two days, adding, “because it’s the simplest case in the world.” Dunn, who worked in the Justice Department, was subsequently fired by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who referred to him as “an example of the Deep State.”

Dunn’s defense team has argued that the prosecution is politically motivated, citing statements by Bondi and the White House as evidence of targeting. Julia Gatto, one of Dunn’s attorneys, questioned why the Department of Justice (DOJ) is pursuing this case, contrasting it with President Trump’s pardons and dismissals of cases related to the January 6 Capitol riots. “The answer is they have different politics. And that’s selective prosecution,” she said during a hearing.

Prosecutors, however, maintain that Dunn’s political views do not shield him from accountability for assaulting a federal officer. “The defendant is being prosecuted for the obvious reason that he was recorded throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range,” they stated.

Dunn faces charges of assaulting, resisting, and interfering with a federal officer, among others.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Poll: Millions Could Exit NYC If Mamdani Wins Mayoral Race.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Hundreds of thousands of New York City residents say they will leave the city if socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the mayoral race, with a poll suggesting millions more may consider leaving.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, independent candidate Andrew Cuomo, Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, and New York City residents.

📍WHEN & WHERE: New York City, ahead of Tuesday’s mayoral election.

💬KEY QUOTE: The poll found that nine percent of New Yorkers would “definitely” leave the city, while 25 percent would “consider” leaving, amounting to over 2.12 million people.

🎯IMPACT: A potential Mamdani term could lead to a significant loss of New York City’s tax base, as seven percent of high earners earning $250,000 or more annually expressed intentions to leave.

IN FULL

New York City could see a mass exodus of residents should the Democrats’ socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani win the mayoral race on Tuesday, with a new poll suggesting that upwards of two million are considering leaving the metropolis of nearly nine million. A poll, conducted by J.L. Partners, revealed that nine percent of New Yorkers would “definitely” leave the city, translating to approximately 765,000 residents, while 25 percent would “consider” leaving, amounting to over 2.12 million people.

This comes as Mamdani, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa face off in the final stretch of the mayoral race. Mamdani, who has previously called for defunding the police, increasing taxes on “whiter neighborhoods”, and implementing a $30 minimum wage, has sparked concern among many residents.

Respondents to the poll used terms such as “disaster,” “hell,” “chaos,” “destroyed,” and “s**thole” to describe what they believe New York City would become under Mamdani’s leadership. Supporters of the Ugandan immigrant, however, described the potential future as “affordable,” “improved,” “hopeful,” and “changed.”

Notbably, the poll found that seven percent of people earning $250,000 or more annually would “definitely” leave the city under Mamdani’s leadership. This could result in a significant loss to the city’s tax base, as the top one percent of earners currently contribute to around half of New York City‘s tax revenue.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.