Friday, December 5, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ADL Still Defending Antifa While Branding TPUSA ‘Extremist’ After Charlie Kirk’s Assassination.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is continuing to label Turning Point USA (TPUSA) as an organization of “Extremism, Hate or Terrorism” following the assassination of its founder, Charlie Kirk, while defending the Antifa movement, recently designated as a terrorist organization.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Charlie Kirk, TPUSA, the ADL, and Antifa.

📍WHEN & WHERE: September 2025, following Kirk’s assassination.

💬KEY QUOTE: “TPUSA was connected to many controversial incidents including problematic comments by TPUSA spokespeople or activists.” – ADL Glossary

🎯IMPACT: The ADL’s partisan actions have sparked calls for federal action against the organization, including the removal of its tax-exempt status.

IN FULL

Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025, allegedly by radical leftist Tyler Robinson, while engaging students in debate on Utah Valley University’s campus, has not moved the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to remove his organization from its list of “Extremism, Hate or Terrorism” groups. However, it continues to defend the Antifa movement, which President Donald J. Trump has designated as a terrorist organization, and insists it is generally not violent.

In its glossary entry for TPUSA, labelled under ‘Extremism, Hate or Terrorism,’ the ADL smears the conservative youth organization as promoting “conspiracy theories related to topics such as election fraud and COVID-19,” and alleges individual associated with it “have a history of bigoted statements about the Black community, the LGBTQ community and specifically transgender people, and other minority groups.”

The ADL also says that “white nationalists openly have attended their events” and that “extremists and far-right conspiracy theorists have been featured at the AmericaFest conference and other TPUSA events,” despite a mealy-mouthed disclaimer that “Kirk himself publicly condemned such groups.”

Meanwhile, it claims the Antifa organization is merely a “decentralized, leaderless movement composed of loose collections of groups, networks and individuals,” insisting: “While some extreme actors who claim to be affiliated with antifa do engage in violence or vandalism at rallies and events, this is not the norm.”

“Persistent disinformation campaigns about antifa distort public perception of the movement,” it complains.

The ADL’s obstinate, partisan stance in the wake of Kirk’s assassination has caused conservatives to call for action against it, with Kenny Cody of Human Events writing, “Out in the open, the Anti-Defamation League is labeling conservative activism amongst the youth as extremist, and now the ADL has blood on its hands… Whether it be through congressional action or emanating from the top of the executive branch, the ADL should lose its tax-exempt status and any federal funding to which the group has access.”

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Congressional Redistricting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) allowed Texas to redraw its electoral map, adding up to five likely Republican-controlled House districts.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Supreme Court, Texas state officials, and the Democratic and Republican parties.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was handed down on Thursday, impacting electoral districts in Texas.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling boosts the GOP’s chances of preserving its Congressional majority while highlighting the ongoing partisan battles over redistricting.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with Texas, permitting the state to implement a new congressional map that creates as many as five additional Republican-leaning House districts. The ruling reverses a lower-court decision that had found the map illegally dismantled majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering.

The decision markedly improves Republicans’ odds of holding their House majority in future cycles. However, the Democrats are pursuing parallel tactics: a new California map is projected to net them multiple seats. This decision is being challenged in the courts by the California GOP and the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ), which contend that the Golden State is racially gerrymandering the new districts in favor of Democrat-leaning Hispanic voters. “Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did,” the DOJ argues.

The recurring redistricting fights highlight how deeply partisan the process has become. Although some advocate for independent, nonpartisan map-drawing commissions, those reforms have struggled to gain traction. As one attorney with the American Constitution Society observed, a party that unilaterally disarmed from redistricting would be “bringing a knife to a gun fight.”

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump to Be Awarded FIFA’s First Peace Prize at World Cup Draw Ceremony.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump will receive the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) inaugural peace prize at the soccer World Cup final draw ceremony.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, FIFA President Gianni Infantino, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Friday at the Kennedy Center, during the World Cup final draw ceremony.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Trump will be introduced by FIFA President Gianni Infantino as the recipient of the event’s peace prize.” – Event Program Draft

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s recognition highlights his involvement in international diplomacy and the global sporting event.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump is set to receive the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA)’s first-ever peace prize at the soccer World Cup final draw ceremony at the Kennedy Center. The gathering will also set the initial group-stage matchups for the 2026 tournament.

The event will involve Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Trump in a ceremonial ball draw. FIFA President Gianni Infantino will kick off the proceedings with opening comments before presenting the peace prize to Trump.

The two-hour show will showcase performances from Andrea Bocelli, Robbie Williams, and Nicole Scherzinger. After taking the stage to accept the award, Trump will give a speech, paving the way for the formal draw led by assistants to create the 12 groups of four teams each. The Village People, famous for their hit “YMCA,” which has become something of a Trump theme song, will wrap up the ceremony.

The news follows the finalization of the latest peace deal to be brokered by the American leader, between Congo and Rwanda, signed on Thursday at the recently renamed Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Jihad al-Shamie

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Man Linked to Synagogue Jihadist Officially Charged with Terrorism.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Mohammad Bashir, 31, has been charged in Britain with four terrorism offenses, including assisting an attacker with reconnaissance and sharing material online encouraging terrorism.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mohammad Bashir, deceased terrorist Jihad Al-Shamie, and Counter Terrorism Policing North West.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Arrested at Manchester Airport, England, on November 27; charges relate to an attack on Heaton Park Synagogue on October 2.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Our prosecutors have concluded there is sufficient evidence to charge Mohammad Bashir with one offence of preparation of terrorist acts and three offences of sharing terrorist publications with Al-Shamie and others with the intent to encourage acts of terrorism.” – Chief Crown Prosecutor Frank Ferguson.

🎯IMPACT: Bashir is set to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to face charges.

IN FULL

Mohammad Bashir, 31, has been charged in Britain with four terrorism offenses after being arrested at Manchester Airport on November 27, the British Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced on December 4. Police allege Bashir aided deceased Syrian migrant Jihad Al-Shamie, responsible for the deadly attack on Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue on October 2, by helping with earlier reconnaissance of a British defence facility. The charges also include sharing material online intended to encourage acts of terrorism.

Prosecutors said the assistance Bashir is accused of providing was “not linked to the attack itself.” He was charged with one count of preparation of terrorist acts and three counts of disseminating terrorist publications. He is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Friday.

The synagogue attack occurred on the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. Al-Shamie drove a car into congregants outside the synagogue before launching a knife attack and later attempted to force entry into the building. Police shot him dead after he was found to be wearing what turned out to be a fake suicide belt. Two worshippers, Melvin Cravitz, 66, and Adrian Daulby, 53, were killed; three others were seriously injured.

During the attack, Al-Shamie reportedly phoned emergency services and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, according to counterterrorism investigators. Police said he had not previously been known to security services. At the time of the attack, he was on bail over an alleged rape.

Bashir, who identifies as British Pakistani, remains in custody ahead of his court appearance. Authorities said the wider investigation into the synagogue attack remains ongoing and asked anyone with information to come forward.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Ireland Joins Boycott of Eurovision Over Israel’s Participation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia announced they will boycott the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest due to Israel’s participation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Broadcasters from Ireland (RTE), Spain (RTVE), the Netherlands (Avrotros), and Slovenia (RTV), and Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The boycott affects the Eurovision Song Contest in 2026, with decisions announced in late 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.” – Irish broadcaster RTE.

🎯IMPACT: The absence of these nations raises questions about the contest’s unity and the role of politics in cultural events.

IN FULL

Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia have announced they will boycott the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest in protest of the decision to allow Israel to compete. The broadcasters cited concerns over Gaza and allegations of unfair voting practices as reasons for their withdrawal.

Spain’s public broadcaster RTVE, which led calls for Israel’s exclusion, said its board had already decided in September to pull out if Israel participated. “This withdrawal also means that RTVE will not broadcast the Eurovision 2026 final… nor the preliminary semi-finals,” the broadcaster said. RTVE added that its request for a secret ballot on Israel’s participation had been denied, a move it said “increases RTVE’s distrust of the festival’s organisation.”

Ireland’s RTE expressed similar views, stating, “Participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.”

Dutch broadcaster AVROTROS said participating under the current circumstances “is incompatible with the public values that are essential to us.”

Israel’s President Isaac Herzog has praised Eurovision’s decision to allow his country to compete, calling it “an appreciated gesture of solidarity, brotherhood, and cooperation, symbolising a victory over those who seek to silence Israel and spread hatred.” He added, “Israel deserves to be represented on every stage in the world, and I am fully and actively committed to that.”

The boycott comes amid a tense political backdrop between Europe and Israel. In May 2024, Ireland and Spain, along with Norway, officially recognized Palestine as an independent state, reflecting support for a two-state solution. Israeli officials have previously stated that European countries recognizing Palestine must accept Palestinian migrants, framing it as a reciprocal expectation.

Tensions have also escalated in the European Union (EU), which in September 2025 proposed sanctions against Israel over human rights concerns in Gaza and the West Bank. The measures included suspending certain trade concessions and targeting extremist government ministers and settler activities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The DOJ Is Investigating This College for Spending Taxpayer Money on Illegal Immigrants, Punishing Whistleblowers.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has launched an investigation into the College of DuPage (COD) for allegedly using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and punishing students who speak out against it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the DOJ, the College of DuPage, and students allegedly affected by the college’s policies.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation was launched on December 2, 2025, and pertains to actions at the College of DuPage, Illinois, following reports received by the DOJ in recent months.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice.” – Harmeet Dhillon

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ has warned that federal funding could be pulled from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

IN FULL

The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation into the College of DuPage in Illinois, following reports that the institution is using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and penalizing students who oppose these actions. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon outlined the allegations in a formal notice to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Education Secretary Linda McMahon.

According to Dhillon, the college has allegedly provided resources and support to illegal immigrants, including an “Undocumented Student Liaison” dedicated to assisting them. The college’s website also reportedly offers a Frequently Asked Questions section that appears to guide readers on evading immigration enforcement.

The College of DuPage, the largest public community college in Illinois, has been accused of violating the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), which restricts illegal immigrants from accessing most taxpayer-funded benefits. Additionally, the college is alleged to have provided alternate Social Security numbers to illegal immigrants to access taxpayer benefits.

The letter further claims that the college is in violation of 8 USC 1373 by allegedly providing staff and students with information on how to obstruct immigration enforcement actions. Earlier this year, the DOJ announced that federal funding would be withdrawn from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

“Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice,” Dhillon wrote, formally referring the allegations to the Departments of Homeland Security and Education for investigation.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rwanda and Congo Sign Historic ‘Washington Accords’ at Trump Peace Institute.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo signed a peace agreement aimed at resolving conflicts in eastern Congo.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, President Félix Tshisekedi of Congo, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path, yes. Indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point.” – President Tshisekedi

🎯IMPACT: The agreement aims to ease conflict in eastern Congo, improve humanitarian conditions, and expand U.S. access to critical minerals.

IN FULL

The leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo formally signed the “Washington Accords” peace agreement at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on Thursday, a venue newly renamed in honor of the American president. Under the terms of the landmark deal, the two African nations agree to observe a permanent ceasefire and disarm the militia proxies operating in the contested territories along their border.

President Trump hosted Rwandan President Paul Kagame and Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi as they signed the accords, which formalize terms the two leaders agreed to in Qatar this past June. As part of the deal, the United States has committed to purchasing rare earth minerals from both nations.

“Today, the United States is also signing our own bilateral agreements with the Congo and Rwanda that will unlock new opportunities for the United States to access critical minerals and provide economic benefits for everybody,” President Trump said, receiving praise from both African leaders. Kagame noted, “We have seen countless magicians and efforts, but none has succeeded in resolving the underlying issues. President Trump introduced a new and effective dynamism that created the space for breakthroughs.”

“I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path. Yes, indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point,” Tshisekedi added.

The conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda has roots in the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and accusations of cross-border militia support. Congo alleges Rwanda backs the M23 rebel group, while Rwanda claims Congo harbors militias hostile to its government. The violence has displaced millions and drawn international concern, with some observers accusing Rwanda of a land grab to secure additional rare earth mineral deposits located in the contested territory.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Zelensky’s Jet Escapes Collision with Four Drones Near Ireland: Report.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Irish authorities are investigating four drones that appeared to follow or attempt to intercept Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plane as it arrived in Dublin.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Irish authorities, and unidentified drone operators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 1, during Zelensky’s state visit to Ireland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” – Volodymyr Zelensky.

🎯IMPACT: The drones breached a no-fly zone and raised concerns over security, though Zelensky’s visit proceeded safely.

IN FULL

Irish authorities are investigating an incident in which four drones appeared to shadow or intercept the plane of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as it landed in Dublin during his first official state visit to Ireland. According to reports, the drones breached a no-fly zone that had been established for his flight path, raising serious concerns about their origin and purpose.

Witnesses say the drones, which reportedly had their lights on, hovered for up to two hours above an Irish warship deployed for protection. Observers estimated the drones had taken off northeast of Dublin and reached the point where Zelensky’s plane would have touched down, had it arrived on schedule. The ship lacked the capability to disable them, and Irish warplanes did not intervene. Authorities are examining whether the drones could have been launched from an undetected vessel at sea.

The Óglaigh na hÉireann (Irish Defense Forces) stated that, for “operational security reasons,” it could not discuss the specifics of any alleged incident.

In a post on X following the visit, Zelensky thanked the Irish people and government: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” He also praised Ireland’s role in supporting Ukraine’s path toward European Union (EU) membership.

The drone incident in Dublin comes amid heightened scrutiny of unmanned aerial operations targeting high-profile figures. Earlier this year, a military commander in Russia claimed that drones targeted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s helicopter during a visit to the Kursk region. The commander said the aircraft was in the “epicenter” of the attack and that Russian air defense forces neutralized the drone before it could reach the flight path. No damage or injuries were reported.

Meanwhile, Kiev and its international partners appear to be inching closer to a diplomatic resolution. According to recent reporting, Ukraine has accepted the core terms of a U.S.-backed peace framework, developed in Geneva, Switzerland, signalling a potential turning point in the nearly four-year war with Russia.

Image via the Houses of the Oireachtas.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Appeals Court Upholds Trump’s National Guard Deployment in D.C.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. appeals court paused a lower court’s order to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., allowing President Donald J. Trump to continue the deployment.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, and National Guard troops from multiple states.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The appeals court decision was issued on December 4, regarding National Guard deployments in Washington, D.C., which began in August.

🎯IMPACT: The decision allows Trump to maintain and increase troop deployments in Washington and potentially other cities, despite legal challenges from Democrats.

IN FULL

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit lifted a lower court injunction that would have required President Donald J. Trump to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. by December 11. With the lower court order removed, the deployment of Guardsmen as part of a crime crackdown in the nation’s capital will continue until at least February 2026.

Issuing an abbreviated ruling, the three-judge appellate panel noted that their decision “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” and is intended to give the court time to consider the case. In its appeal of the November 20 injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb—a Joe Biden appointee—the Trump administration cited the Thanksgiving Eve terrorist attack against two National Guard members in Washington, D.C. that left one dead and the other in critical condition. Following the attack, President Trump ordered an additional 500 troops to be deployed to the city.

The lawsuit was filed by District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D), who accused Trump of unlawfully taking control of the city’s law enforcement and violating laws prohibiting federal troops from performing domestic police work. Judge Jia Cobb had previously ruled the deployment likely unlawful and temporarily blocked it, but allowed time for an appeal.

Democrat lawmakers have attempted to push back against similar troop deployments in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, calling them politically motivated shows of force. Legal challenges persist, with the U.S. Supreme Court expected to weigh in on the broader issue of National Guard deployments in cities such as Chicago.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tim Walz Complains That Calling Him Retarded Will Lead to Violence.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) is worried that people calling him “retarded” could lead to violence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tim Walz, President Donald J. Trump, and people calling Tim Walz retarded.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Walz expressed his concerns at a press conference on December 4.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people.” – Tim Walz.

🎯IMPACT: Walz’s comments come despite much of the political violence in 2025 and 2024 being carried out by far-left extremists, such as the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassinations of President Trump.

IN FULL

Minnesota Governor and failed 2024 vice presidential candidate Tim Walz (D) has complained that people are driving by his home and calling him a retard, claiming that such language could lead to violence, just days after President Donald J. Trump referred to him as “retarded.” During a press conference on December 4, Walz claimed, “This creates danger,” adding, “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people. This is shameful.”

Walz further complained that he has yet to see any elected Republicans agree with him that such behavior is “shameful,” saying, “I’m worried. We know how these things go. They start with taunts, and they turn to violence.”

The comments come just days after President Trump referred to Walz as “seriously retarded” on Truth Social last week, following reports of Somali migrant crime, including accusations of over a billion dollars in fraud. “Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for ‘prey’ as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone,” President Trump said.

“The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both,” he noted.

The corporate media attempted to make President Trump walk back the comments aboard Air Force One on November 30, but the President doubled down, saying, “Yeah, I think there’s something wrong with him, absolutely, sure.”

He then referred to the Somali fraud case, where some money defrauded from U.S. taxpayers may have ended up funding the Islamist al-Qaeda franchise al-Shabaab. “Anybody that would do what [Walz] did, anybody that would allow those people into a state and pay billions of dollars [to] Somalia… It’s not even a country, because it doesn’t function like a country. It’s got a name, but it doesn’t function like a country. Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

Notably, hundreds of government workers in Walz’s own administration have accused him of covering up fraud by Somalis and retaliating against whistleblowers.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Town Votes Against Expansion of Islamic Academy.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A zoning board in Hoover, Alabama, unanimously rejected a proposal to relocate a Muslim K-12 school after a heated meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission, local residents, and representatives of the Islamic Academy of Alabama.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting took place this week in Hoover, Alabama.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s not about religion. It’s about traffic.” – Jeff Wilson, the Hoover resident who initiated the petition opposing the relocation.

🎯IMPACT: The proposal now moves to the Hoover City Council for a final decision.

IN FULL

Residents of a city in Alabama packed a local zoning board meeting this week in opposition to a proposal to relocate an Islamic school to their town from a nearby municipality. The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 against rezoning property currently used for office space to accommodate the Islamic Academy of Alabama, currently located about 12 miles away in the city of Homewood.

Concerns about traffic congestion, adherence to long-term city development plans, and the precedent such a zoning change might set were cited as reasons for the decision. However, pressure from around 200 citizens attending the meeting likely had a significant impact on the zoning board’s decision.

A petition opposing the plan gathered over 1,700 signatures. “It’s not about religion,” said Jeff Wilson, a resident who initiated the petition, “It’s about traffic.” Meadowbrook resident Nancy Cooper also pointed out that six schools already serving more than 5,600 students feed traffic into Highway 119, often turning it into “a parking lot.”

However, some attendees expressed concerns beyond infrastructure. Signs warning of an Islamic “100-year plan” and comparisons to Muslim-dominated Dearborn, Michigan, were seen. One speaker said Muslims had implemented a “long-term cultural takeover” in Britain, drawing applause from some attendees. Commission Chairman Mike Wood interrupted, stating, “We are here to look at whether this school was appropriately placed. We’re not here for that. I’m sorry. We’re not going to listen to that.”

While Monday’s vote is advisory, the final decision now rests with the Hoover City Council, which will review the proposal in the coming weeks.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.