❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced a ban on new foreign-made drones, including those from Chinese manufacturers DJI and Autel, citing national security concerns.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The FCC, Chinese drone companies DJI and Autel, U.S. lawmakers, and industry stakeholders like Michael Robbins of AUVSI and American drone manufacturers.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Monday, following a review mandated by a defense bill passed in 2024. The decision impacts the U.S. market.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Recent history underscores why the United States must increase domestic drone production and secure its supply chains,” said Michael Robbins of AUVSI.
🎯IMPACT: The decision aims to reduce dependence on Chinese technology and bolster American manufacturing.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday its decision to ban new foreign-made drones, including those manufactured by Chinese companies DJI and Autel. The move follows a review mandated by a defense bill passed in 2022, which raised concerns about the national security risks posed by Chinese-made drones.
The FCC stated that all drones and critical components produced in foreign countries pose “unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons.” However, exemptions may be granted for specific drones or components if the Department of War (DOW) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determines they do not pose such risks.
“Recent history underscores why the United States must increase domestic drone production and secure its supply chains,” Michael Robbins, president and CEO of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), said in a statement welcoming the decision. He emphasized the need for the U.S. to reduce reliance on China and strengthen its domestic drone manufacturing capabilities.
Chinese drone maker DJI expressed disappointment, claiming the decision reflects protectionism rather than evidence-based security concerns. “Concerns about DJI’s data security have not been grounded in evidence and instead reflect protectionism, contrary to the principles of an open market,” the company said in a statement. On Tuesday, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman declared the ban “discriminatory.”
The decision has sparked mixed reactions. Gene Robinson, a Texas-based law enforcement trainer who uses DJI drones, acknowledged the challenges posed by the ban but supported the need for the U.S. to regain manufacturing independence. “We need to suck it up, and let’s not have it happen again,” he said.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.