Tuesday, July 29, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

TikTok Is KEY News Source for Young American Adults.

A recent survey by the Pew Research Center indicates a significant increase in the number of American young adults getting their news from TikTok. The survey, conducted between July 15 and August 4, included responses from 10,658 U.S. adults on their regular news sources.

Seventeen percent of respondents identified TikTok as a regular source of news, compared to just 3 percent in 2020. This trend is more pronounced among young adults aged 18 to 29, with 39 percent stating they use TikTok for news. This marks a massive rise from the nine percent in this age group who said the same in 2020. Adults aged 30 to 49 are less inclined to turn to TikTok for their news, with 19 percent doing so in 2024.

Overall, 52 percent of TikTok users indicate they regularly consume news on the app. This is an increase from 43 percent last year and just 22 percent in 2020.

“No social media platform we’ve studied has seen faster growth in the share of Americans who regularly turn to it for news,” Pew stresses.

This development could be good news for former President Donald J. Trump, despite his opposition to TikTok over its Chinese Communist Party (CCP) links. The former president began using the platform in June rather than leave the field open to the Biden-Harris government and the Democrats, who invested in establishing a presence on the platform early on.

Trump content has gone on to vastly outperform posts supporting Biden and Harris, with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, noting in June that the former president “is reaching young people in a way like never before.”

“Every piece of anecdotal evidence is showing us that young people are more and more interested in what the political right, the nationalist, populist right, has to say,” Kassam added.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trans Illegal Charged with Raping Boy in Bathroom.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A transgender illegal alien is facing charges of raping a 14-year-old boy in New York City.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nicol Suarez, a 30-year-old illegal alien from Colombia, and a 14-year-old boy.

📍WHEN & WHERE: February, at a bodega near Thomas Jefferson Park in East Harlem, New York City.

💬KEY QUOTE: Police sources indicated Suarez had been shielded by New York City’s sanctuary policy.

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights the consequences of sanctuary city policies that hinder federal immigration enforcement.

IN FULL

A 30-year-old Colombian transgender illegal immigrant who is biologically male but claims to be a woman made his first appearance in a New York court last week on charges of child rape. According to prosecutors, the man, who goes by Nicol Suarez, raped a 14-year-old boy in the bathroom of a bodega in East Harlem this past February.

Despite his unlawful status, warrants in Manhattan and New Jersey, and a detainer issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) prior to the alleged rape, Suarez was sheltered from arrest by New York City’s sanctuary policies. Only after the sexual assault of the minor was the transgender illegal finally taken into custody.

A pre-trial hearing is scheduled for September, and Suarez is being held at Rikers Island until then on a quarter-million-dollar bond. According to court documents, Suarez is accused of stalking the male minor into the bodega’s bathroom, where he proceeded to sexually assault the 14-year-old.

Following the rape, the child fled the bathroom and informed people nearby of the assault. Police were then called, with Suarez being arrested the next day on charges of first-degree rape.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Democrat AGs Bring Lawfare Case to Stop Trump Tracking Illegals.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: New York Attorney General Letitia James is leading a lawsuit against the Trump administration over demands for state data on food stamp recipients to help track illegal immigrants.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Letitia James, California AG Rob Bonta, Michigan AG Dana Nessel, and 20 Democratic attorneys general versus the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was announced Monday, with a deadline set for July 30 for data submission.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This administration is attempting to use this program as a tool in their cruel and chaotic targeting of immigrants,” said Letitia James.

🎯IMPACT: Democratic attorneys general claim the Trump administration’s move violates privacy laws and threatens funding for food assistance programs.

IN FULL

New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), alongside California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D), announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its demands for detailed data on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients. The administration has threatened to withhold SNAP funding from states that fail to comply by the July 30 deadline.

James criticized the move as an “illegal data grab” targeting illegal immigrants. “This administration is attempting to use this program as a tool in their cruel and chaotic targeting of immigrants,” she said during a press call. The attorneys general argue that the request violates federal privacy laws and exceeds the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) authority.

Bonta condemned the demands as a “bait-and-switch,” asserting that SNAP recipients provided information to access food assistance, not to be tracked or targeted. “This kind of targeting doesn’t make America safer. It threatens kids’ access to school meals and jeopardizes wildfire survivors’ access to relief,” he claimed.

The lawsuit follows a series of legal challenges led by Democratic attorneys general against Trump’s policies. They argue that expanded data requirements, which include immigration status, marital status, and employment history, are a violation of federal statutes and the Spending Clause.

“They’re bypassing legal procedures, ignoring privacy protections, and demanding data that federal law explicitly says can only be used for administering the SNAP program,” Bonta stated.

Critics say the lawsuit appears to be little more than a continuation of lawfare efforts to prevent President Donald J. Trump from ending the illegal immigration crisis enabled by the former Biden-Harris government.

Image by Matt Cohen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Just Caught an Illegal Alien Working as an Armed Policeman.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Jamaican national residing in the United States illegally has been arrested after attempting to unlawfully purchase a firearm. Shockingly, he was working as a police officer with the Old Orchard Beach Police Department in Maine.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jon Luke Evans, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), ICE Boston Field Office director Patricia Hyde, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), and Maine’s Old Orchard Beach Police Department.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The arrest was announced on Monday, July 28, 2025, with Evans having overstayed his U.S. visa in October 2023.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We have a police department that was knowingly breaking the very law they are charged with enforcing in order to employ an illegal alien.” — ICE Boston Field Office director Patricia Hyde

🎯IMPACT: The arrest of Evans is raising alarms about whether local law enforcement, especially in sanctuary jurisdictions, are enforcing U.S. laws or even conducting proper background checks on their own employees.

IN FULL

An illegal immigrant has been arrested after his attempt to unlawfully purchase a firearm was flagged by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). Shockingly, Jon Luke Evans—a Jamaican national—was employed as a police officer in Maine when he attempted the gun purchase.

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Evans—who entered the U.S. through Miami, Florida, on September 24, 2023—failed to board his return flight to Jamaica on October 1, 2023, subsequently overstaying his visa. Somehow, despite no longer having legal status to remain in the United States, Evans was eventually hired as a police officer with the Old Orchard Beach Police Department in Old Orchard Beach, Maine.

The circumstances under which a local Maine police department hired Evans remain unclear. However, the Jamaican’s status as an illegal immigrant was discovered by federal immigration agents after he attempted to purchase a firearm for his job. Evans has admitted to the illegal purchase.

“Jon Luke Evans not only broke U.S. immigration law, but he also illegally attempted to purchase a firearm,” ICE Boston Field Office director Patricia Hyde said in a statement regarding the illegal immigrant’s arrest. “Shockingly, Evans was employed as a local law enforcement officer. The fact that a police department would hire an illegal alien and unlawfully issue him a firearm while on duty would be comical if it weren’t so tragic.”

The Old Orchard Beach Police Department is not escaping federal scrutiny, with Hyde adding: “We have a police department that was knowingly breaking the very law they are charged with enforcing in order to employ an illegal alien.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Repeats That He Is ‘Allowed’ to Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump again noted that he has the power to pardon Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, stating he is “allowed” to do so—but has not been approached about it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s remarks were made on Monday during interactions with reporters, and echoed comments from the prior Friday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Well, I’m allowed to give her a pardon, but nobody’s approached me with it, nobody’s asked me about it.” — President Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The comments have reignited debate over the possibility of a pardon for Maxwell, who was convicted of child sex trafficking in 2021 and sentenced to 20 years in prison.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump was again questioned on July 28 about the possibility of pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 of child sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison for her connection to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell already received limited immunity in exchange for talking to Attorney General Pam Bondi’s deputy, Todd Blanche, about around a hundred people connected to Epstein.

In response to a pardon question, Trump stated, “Well, I’m allowed to give her a pardon, but nobody’s approached me with it, nobody’s asked me about it.” He added, “It’s in the news about that—that aspect of it, but right now it would be inappropriate to talk about it.”

These comments echo remarks he made last Friday, where he said of a pardon, “It’s something I haven’t thought about… I’m allowed to do it, but it’s something I have not thought about.”

Notably, the responses do not shut down the possibility of a pardon for Maxwell, leaving the option open.

Maxwell or her attorneys may have played a role in fueling discontent with President Trump’s handling of the Epstein case, which intensified after a birthday message Trump supposedly wrote to the pedophile was leaked to The Wall Street Journal. Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes the message “was likely leaked by Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers to try and blackmail her way into a pardon.”

Epstein, who died in 2019, has become an issue for the Trump administration since AG Bondi released a memo claiming no “client list” for the sex trafficker exists, despite the fact that she previously said that a list was “on [her] desk” and would eventually be disclosed.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Shortens Deadline for Putin to Make Peace.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump issued a new, shorter deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, reducing the timeline to “ten or twelve days.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, President Vladimir Putin, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and other officials, including Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, and Ukrainian Chief of Staff Andriy Yermak.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced during a news conference in Scotland on Monday, following a meeting with Prime Minister Starmer.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We were going to have a ceasefire and maybe peace… and all of a sudden you have missiles flying into Kiev and other places,” said Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The ultimatum has drawn mixed reactions, with Ukrainian officials praising the stance and Russian officials dismissing the deadline, at least in public.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has set a new, shorter deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire over the ongoing war in Ukraine, reducing the timeline to “ten or 12 days” from Monday. Speaking at a news conference in Scotland, Trump emphasized there was “no reason” to wait any longer, citing a lack of progress towards peace.

Trump reiterated his threat to impose severe sanctions and secondary tariffs on Russia, which he previously described as a 100 percent import tax on any country trading with Moscow. He suggested this would prompt third countries to look elsewhere for trade and reduce revenue for Russia.

During the conference, Trump expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s actions, saying, “We were going to have a ceasefire and maybe peace… and all of a sudden you have missiles flying into Kiev and other places.”

“I say, forget it. I’m not gonna talk anymore. This has happened on too many occasions, and I don’t like it,” Trump remarked.

The Kremlin has not officially responded to the new deadline. Meanwhile, Ukrainian Chief of Staff Andriy Yermak praised Trump for “delivering a clear message of peace through strength,” adding that Putin “respects only power.”

Despite three rounds of ceasefire talks hosted by Turkey, no significant progress has been made towards ending the Ukraine war, which has now lasted over three and a half years.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘You Can’t Fake That’ — Trump Disagrees With Netanyahu on Gaza Starvation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump expressed disagreement with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that there is no starvation in Gaza.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu, Hamas, and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The comments were made on Monday during Trump’s meeting with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is real starvation in Gaza—you can’t fake that.” — President Trump

🎯IMPACT: International pressure to bring the Gaza conflict to a close amid a growing humanitarian crisis is growing.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump publicly disagreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s assertion that there is no starvation in Gaza, citing televised images of hungry children as evidence. Trump’s remarks came during a press event at his Turnberry, Scotland, resort with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

“Based on television, I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry,” Trump stated when asked if he agreed with Netanyahu that there is no starvation. “There is real starvation in Gaza—you can’t fake that.”

Trump added: “Hamas doesn’t want to give the hostages. I told Bibi that he will have to now maybe do it in a different way.” The U.S. President emphasized that he believes a ceasefire “is possible” and that the conflict in Gaza must end. He also said the U.S. would be providing food aid.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza is deteriorating, with recent ceasefire talks collapsing. Israel has begun implementing daily humanitarian pauses in military operations in several areas of Gaza and conducted air drops of food, a move mirrored by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Jordan. Despite these efforts, Netanyahu maintains his stance that there is no starvation in the region.

In recent weeks, the Trump White House has signalled a degree of frustration with Netanyahu. Following recent Israeli bombing strikes against Syria, anonymous White House officials told Axios, “Bibi acted like a madman. He bombs everything all the time,” and “Netanyahu is sometimes like a child who just won’t behave.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The Washington Post’s Anti-Trump ‘Fact Checker’ Jumps Ship Over ‘Financial Considerations.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Glenn Kessler, editor of The Washington Post‘s “The Fact Checker,” announced he is leaving the paper after 27 years, citing financial considerations as a key factor in his decision.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Glenn Kessler, Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray, and other high-profile contributors who also took buyouts.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Kessler will leave The Washington Post on July 31, with the buyout program concluding this week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Much as I would have liked to keep scrutinizing politicians in Washington, especially in this era, the financial considerations were impossible to dismiss.” – Glenn Kessler

🎯IMPACT: The Washington Post has not signalled an immediate successor for Kessler, and it is unclear whether the newspaper will continue to have a newsroom employee dedicated to “fact-checking.”

IN FULL

Glenn Kessler, editor of The Washington Post‘s “The Fact Checker,” has announced his departure from the paper after 27 years, including nearly 15 years leading the fact-checking division. Kessler revealed his decision to leave on Facebook, stating, “After more than 27 years at The Washington Post, including almost 15 as The Fact Checker, I will be leaving on July 31, having taken a buyout.”

Kessler cited financial considerations as a major factor in his decision and expressed disappointment that no agreement was reached to allow him to remain on a contract basis while a successor was found. “I didn’t want The Post to have a gap in fact-checking coverage during this fraught period in U.S. history. But we couldn’t work out an agreement,” he wrote. Kessler also noted that he had written or edited over 3,000 fact checks during his tenure.

The Washington Post‘s buyout program, introduced by executive editor Matt Murray in the face of collapsing revenue and readership, has also seen other prominent contributors, including columnists Jonathan Capehart, Catherine Rampell, Philip Bump, and Joe Davidson, leave the paper. The program offers financial incentives based on years of service, with veteran employees receiving up to 18 months of base pay.

Notably, the Jeff Bezos-owned newspaper shed two other prominent newspaper staffers after Pulitzer Prize winners Darrin Bell—a cartoonist—and Thomas Pham LeGro—a video journalist—were separately arrested on charges of possession of child pornography.

Kessler and the other departures come amid broader editorial changes at the paper, driven by Bezos’s push to align the Post with principles of personal liberties and free markets. Bezos’ directive earlier this year led to the resignation of opinion editor David Shipley and sparked further resignations and subscription cancellations from liberal readers. The paper has faced similar backlash in the past over editorial decisions.

Despite a career mostly aimed at smearing Republican lawmakers, and especially President Donald J. Trump, the soon-to-be former fact checker for The Washington Post did begrudgingly admit in 2023 that former President Joe Biden regularly lies to the public regarding his past, not simply embellishing, but outright fabricating details about his personal and family history.

Image by Dion Hinchcliffe.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Is Ghislaine Maxwell Trying to ‘Blackmail Her Way Into a Pardon?’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Convicted child sex trafficker and Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell is reportedly demanding that President Donald J. Trump grant her a pardon for her crimes in exchange for cooperating with federal investigators on an ongoing controversy over an alleged Epstein “client list.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Blanche held a second meeting with Maxwell and her attorneys on Friday, July 25, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I predicted this weeks ago, and non-practitioner, hyper-online, nouveau-MAGA internet idiots claimed I was insane. Turns out I’m just always right.” — Raheem Kassam

🎯IMPACT: The leak of an alleged birthday letter from Trump to Epstein, along with other narratives linking the two, may be a ploy by Maxwell’s attorneys to “blackmail her way into a pardon.”

IN FULL

Convicted child sex trafficker and Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell is reportedly demanding that President Donald J. Trump grant her a pardon for her crimes in exchange for cooperating with federal investigators on an ongoing controversy over an alleged Epstein “client list”

“We haven’t spoken to the President or anybody about a pardon just yet,” Maxwell’s attorney, David Oscar Markus, said on Friday, but noted that, “The President this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way.”

The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam previously raised the possibility that Maxwell’s attorneys are actively working to foment controversy around Epstein, President Trump, and the alleged client list as a ploy to secure freedom for their client.

“I predicted this weeks ago, and non-practitioner, hyper-online, nouveau-MAGA internet idiots claimed I was insane. Turns out I’m just always right,” Kassam wrote on X (formerly Twitter), responding to the revelation that Maxwell’s lawyers are pushing Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche for a presidential pardon.

Last week, addressing President Trump’s lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over an alleged birthday card and message Trump sent to Epstein: “It’s almost certainly real. Why would someone go to the lengths to invent a cringey birthday card that proves nothing? It was likely leaked by Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers to try and blackmail her way into a pardon. THINK.”

“A lawsuit will prove nothing either way. I promise you that. There will be some settlement over the terminology, such as that the letter ‘may have been provided by a Trump Organization employee against the President’s knowledge…’ etc etc,” Kassam added.

On Friday, while fielding questions outside the White House, Trump acknowledged for the first time that the birthday letter could be real, and indeed speculated that someone else may have signed his name to the message. Previously, President Trump insisted the letter did not exist. Notably, the Wall Street Journal does not appear to possess the letter, but was informed of its alleged contents by a source.

“I don’t even know what they’re talking about,” Trump said, adding: “Now, somebody could have written a letter and used my name, but that’s happened a lot.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Warns ‘You’re Not Going to Have Europe Anymore’ Due to Mass Migration.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump doubled down on his comments on European migration policies, warning that Europe may irrevocably change if current policies remain in place.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump arrived in Scotland on Friday evening for a four-day visit to his golf clubs in Aberdeen and Ayrshire.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They’ve got to get their act together. If they don’t, you’re not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it.” – President Donald J. Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s remarks have reignited debates over immigration policies in Europe, with Nigel Farage’s Reform Party calling for the number of migrants to be slashed.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has doubled down on his comments Friday regarding Europe’s immigration policies, when he described the situation as a “horrible invasion.” Speaking to reporters on July 28, Trump remarked, “Europe is a much different place than it was just five years ago, 10 years ago. They’ve got to get their act together. If they don’t, you’re not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it,” he said on Monday.

Trump emphasized illegal immigration, saying, “You cannot let people come in here illegally. And what happens is, there’ll be murderers, there’ll be drug dealers, there’ll be all sorts of things that other countries don’t want, and they send them to you, [like] they send them to us, and you’ve got to stop them.” His comments come amid a surge in migrant boats crossing the English Channel, with more than 40,000 people having landed in Britain since Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party took power last July.

When questioned about Trump’s choice of words, particularly his use of the term “invasion” on Friday, Starmer’s Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, pushed back. “No, I wouldn’t [use the term]… I don’t know whether [Trump is] talking about other European countries there, or the wider context,” he said.

Net immigration to Britain in the year to December 2024 is currently estimated at 431,000, although provisional figures in recent years have all been revised upwards substantially. The total is down from the “Boriswave” peak of close to a million under former prime ministers Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, but still one of the highest figures in British history by hundreds of thousands.

 

Photo by Rasande Tyskar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

London’s ‘Nasty’ Mayor Khan Clashes With Trump: ‘Diversity Makes Us Stronger.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is clashing with London Mayor Sadiq Khan on his trip to the United Kingdom, with Trump criticizing Khan’s performance as Mayor of London and Khan defending mass migration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Sadiq Khan, and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The exchange took place on July 28, 2025, in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m not a fan of your mayor… He’s a nasty person.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: The exchange extends President Trump’s yearslong feud with Khan, who has publicly denounced the America First leader as “racist, sexist, homophobic, and Islamophobic” and rooted for Hillary Clinton and his other election opponents.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump criticized London Mayor Sadiq Khan during a meeting with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer—a Labour Party colleague of Khan’s—describing him as a “nasty person” who has done “a terrible job” running the British capital. “I’m not a fan of your mayor,” Trump told the press, with Starmer laughing nervously and interjecting “He’s a friend of mine, actually” after the American leader remarked on Khan’s poor performance.

Unmoved by the Prime Minister’s intervention, Trump continued, “No, I think he’s done a terrible job,” while expressing willingness to visit London.

Khan, who has attacked Trump as “racist, sexist, homophobic, and Islamophobic” and accused him of “defending white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and anti-Semites” for close to a decade, responded via a spokesman, who said, “Sadiq is delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world. He’d see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer.”

However, contrary to Khan’s claims, recent official statistics and studies suggest that mass migration is, overall, a significant net drain on Britain in general and London in particular. For instance, low-wage migrant workers—who comprise a majority of migrant workers—are estimated to drain the equivalent of nearly $200,000, net, by the time they reach retirement age, rising to over $650,000 each if they live to 80 and well over $1 million if they live to 100.

Notably, migrants who arrive on work visas are a minority of the migrants arriving in Britain annually, with a combination of jobless dependents, asylum seekers, and others who are an even larger drain on the public finances, making up the bulk of the yearly influx.

Many migrants are also a significantly greater threat to public safety than the British-born, too, with Afghans, for instance, being over 22 times more likely to be over 22 times more likely to be convicted of sex crimes.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.