Tuesday, December 9, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICYMI: Trump’s Full Speech to Globalist World Economic Forum in Davos.

President Donald J. Trump made a virtual appearance at the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland on Thursday, drawing battle lines by emphasizing national sovereignty, rejecting its climate agenda, and threatening the European Union (EU) on trade.

READ:

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much, Klaus [Schwab]. And hello to everyone in beautiful Davos.

This has been a truly historic week in the United States. Three days ago, I took the oath of office, and we began the golden age of America. The recent presidential election was won by millions of votes and all seven — every one of them — all seven swing states. It was a massive mandate from the American people like hasn’t been seen in many years. And some of the political pundits, even some of my so-called enemies, said it was the most consequential election victory in 129 years. That’s quite nice.

What the world has witnessed in the past 72 hours is nothing less than a revolution of common sense. Our country will soon be stronger, wealthier, and more united than ever before, and the entire planet will be more peaceful and prosperous as a result of this incredible momentum and what we’re doing and going to do.

My administration is acting with unprecedented speed to fix the disasters we’ve inherited from a totally inept group of people and to solve every single crisis facing our country.

This begins with confronting the economic chaos caused by the failed policies of the last administration. Over the past four years, our government racked up $8 trillion in wasteful deficit spending and inflicted nation-wrecking energy restrictions, crippling regulations, and hidden taxes like never before. The result is the worst inflation crisis in modern history and sky-high interest rates for our citizens and even throughout the world. Food prices and the price of almost every other thing known to mankind went through the roof.

President Biden totally lost control of what was going on in our country but, in particular, with our high-inflation economy and at our border. Because of these ruinous policies, total government spending this year is $1.5 trillion higher than was projected to occur when I left office just four years ago. Likewise, the cost of servicing the debt is more than 230 percent higher than was projected in 2020.

The inflation rate we are inheriting remains 50 percent higher than the historic target. It was the highest inflation probably in the history of our country. That’s why, from the moment I took office, I’ve taken rapid action to reverse each and every one of these radical left policies that created this calamity — in particular, with immigration, crime, and inflation.

On day one, I signed an executive order directing every member of my Cabinet to marshal all powers at their disposal to defeat inflation and reduce the cost of daily life. I imposed a federal hiring freeze, a federal regulation freeze, a foreign aid freeze, and I created the new Department of Government Efficiency.

I terminated the ridiculous and incredibly wasteful Green New Deal — I call it the “Green New Scam”; withdrew from the one-sided Paris Climate Accord; and ended the insane and costly electric vehicle mandate. We’re going to let people buy the car they want to buy.

I declared a national em- — energy emergency — and it’s so important — national energy emergency to unlock the liquid gold under our feet and pave the way for rapid approvals of new energy infrastructure. The United States has the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we’re going to use it.

Not only will this reduce the cost of virtually all goods and services, it will make the United States a manufacturing superpower and the world capital of artificial intelligence and crypto.

My administration has also begun the largest deregulation campaign in history, far exceeding even the record-setting efforts of my last term.

In total, the Biden administration imposed $50,000 in additional regulatory costs on the average American household over the last four years. I have promised to eliminate 10 old regulations for every new regulation, which will soon put many thousands of dollars back in the pockets of American families.

To further unleash our economy, our majorities in the House and Senate — which we also took, along with the presidency — are going to pass the largest tax cut in American history, including massive tax cuts for workers and family and big tax cuts for domestic producers and manufacturers. And we’re working with the Democrats on getting an extension of the original Trump tax cuts, as you probably know by just reading any paper.

My message to every business in the world is very simple: Come make your product in America, and we will give you among the lowest taxes of any nation on Earth. We’re bringing them down very substantially, even from the original Trump tax cuts. But if you don’t make your product in America, which is your prerogative, then, very simply, you will have to pay a tariff — differing amounts, but a tariff — which will direct hundreds of billions of dollars and even trillions of dollars into our Treasury to strengthen our economy and pay down debt.

Under the Trump administration, there will be no better place on Earth to create jobs, build factories, or grow a company than right here in the good old USA.

Already, American’s economic — and you can see this, I think, maybe even in your — in your wonderful, wonderful room that you’re all gathered together — so many of my friends — but, Americans, the economic confidence is soaring like we haven’t seen in many, many decades, maybe not at all.

Upon my election, it was just announced that small-business optimism skyrocketed by 41 points in a single month. That’s the highest ever. There’s never been anything like that.

SoftBank has announced between a $100 and $200 billion investment in the U.S. economy because of the election result. And just two days ago, Oracle, SoftBank, and OpenAI announced a $500 billion investment in AI infrastructure. Other companies, likewise, have announced billions and billions and billions — adding up to trillions — of investment in America, in the United States.

And it’s also reported today in the papers that Saudi Arabia will be investing at least $600 billion in America. But I’ll be asking the crown prince, who’s a fantastic guy, to round it out to around $1 trillion. I think they’ll do that because we’ve been very good to them. And I’m also going to ask Saudi Arabia and OPEC to bring down the cost of oil. You got to bring it down, which, frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t do before the election. That didn’t show a lot of love by them not doing it. I was a little surprised by that.

If the price came down, the Russia-Ukraine war would end immediately. Right now, the price is high enough that that war will continue. You got to bring down the oil price; you’re going to end that war. They should have done it long ago. They’re very responsible, actually, to a certain extent, for what’s taking place — millions of lives are being lost.

With oil prices going down, I’ll demand that interest rates drop immediately. And, likewise, they should be dropping all over the world. Interest rates should follow us.

All over, the progress that you’re seeing is happening because of our historic victory in a recent presidential election, one that has become quite well known throughout the world.

I think a lot of things are happening to a lot of countries. They say that there’s light shining all over the world since the election. And even countries that we aren’t particularly friendly with are happy because they understand what — there is a future and th- — how great the future will be.

Under our leadership, America is back and open for business. And this week, I’m also taking swift action to stop the invasion at our southern border. They allowed people to come in at levels that nobody has ever seen before. It was ridiculous. I decided a — and declared to dec- — to — to do — and very, very importantly — a national emergency on our border; immediately halted all entry of illegal border crossers, of which there were many; and began properly returning the illegal trespassers back to the place from which they came.

That action, as you’ve probably seen, has already started very strongly. I have deployed active-duty U.S. military and National Guard troops to the border to assist in repelling the invasion. It was really an invasion. We will not allow our territory to be violated.

After four long years, the United States is strong and sovereign and a beautiful nation once again. It’s a strong, sovereign nation.

In addition, I’m pleased to report that America is also a free nation once again. On day one, I signed an executive order to stop all government censorship. No longer will our government label the speech of our own citizens as misinformation or disinformation, which are the favorite words of censors and those who wish to stop the free exchange of ideas and, frankly, progress. We have saved free speech in America, and we’ve saved it strongly.

With another historic executive order this week, I also ended the weaponization of law enforcement against the American people — and, frankly, against politicians — and restored the fair, equal, and impartial rule of law.

My administration has taken action to abolish all discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion nonsense — and these are policies that were absolute nonsense — throughout the government and the private sector. With the recent, yet somewhat unexpected, great Supreme Court decision just made, America will once again become a merit-based country. You have to hear that word: merit-based country.

And I’ve made it official — an official policy of the United States that there are only two genders, male and female, and we will have no men participating in women’s sports, and transgender operations, which became the rage, will occur very rarely.

Finally, as we restore common sense in America, we’re moving quickly to bring back strength and peace and stability abroad. I’m also going to ask all NATO nations to increase defense spending to 5 percent of GDP, which is what it should have been years ago — it was only at 2 percent, and most nations didn’t pay until I came along; I insisted that they pay, and they did — because the United States was really paying the difference at that time, and it’s — it was unfair to the United States. But many, many things have been unfair for many years to the United States.

Before even taking office, my team negotiated a ceasefire agreement in the Middle East, which wouldn’t have happened without us, as I think most of the people in the room know. Earlier this week, the hostages began to return to their families. They are returning, and it’s a beautiful sight. And they’ll be coming in more and more. They started coming back on Sunday.

Our efforts to secure a peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine are now, hopefully, underway. It’s so important to get that done. That is an absolute killing field.

Millions of soldiers are being killed. Nobody has seen anything like it since World War II. They’re laying dead all over the flat fields. It’s a flat field — farmland, and there’s millions of Russians and millions of Ukrainians. Nobody’s seen anything like it since World War II. It’s time to end it.

And here in America, we have big events coming up. Next year we have the 250th anniversary of America’s founding. I’m so honored to be president during that. That’s been a big event. They’ve been talking about it for 10 years. We also have the World Cup, and I understand Gianni — Gianni is in the room — Infantino. He was very instrumental in helping us get it — he’s there with you someplace, I think — and I want to thank him for that.

And then we have the Olympics coming up, which I was instrumental in getting, also, in my first term. And who would have known that by skipping a term, I would get the Olympics? I was upset. I said, “You know, I got the Olympics to come and I won’t be president.” But it turned out, through a stroke of luck or whatever you might call it, that I’m going to be president during the World Cup and the Olympics and the 250th

anniversary. So, that’s going to be three big events.

And we’ve accomplished more in less than four days — we have really been working — four days — than other administrations have accomplished in four years, and we’re just getting started. It’s really an amazing thing to see, and the spirit and the light over our country has been incredible.

Under the last administration, our nation has suffered greatly, but we are going to bring it back and make it greater, bigger, stronger, better than ever before.

I want to thank everybody for being with you. I would have been there myself, except the inauguration was two days ago. I thought it might be a little bit quick to make it the first stop, but we’ll get there one day. We hope to get there.

But I — I do appreciate — I heard the audience is fantastic, and many of my friends are in the audience. And I will be taking questions now from some very distinguished people.

Thank you all very much. (Applause.)

MR. BRENDE: Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. President, for that very powerful speech, and I think you could hear the applause all the way from Davos to the White House. But next year, it will be even better, because then you can get the applause here in Davos. So, we wish you welcome to our village next year. We hope to see you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much.

MR. BRENDE: So, we also know, Mr. President, that you open up for interaction here. We have a great panel with some of the most distinguished businesspeople in the world.

Let me start with someone that you know really well, that I think is almost a neighbor of you in Mal-a- — in — in Florida, Mr. Steve Schwarzman, chairman, CEO, and cofounder of Blackstone Group.

So, Steve, floor is yours.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: Well, Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Steve.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: — I’m sure the crown prince of Saudi Arabia will be really glad you gave this speech today. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: I hope so.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: You’ve had the busiest four days that anybody can imagine, and congratulations for that.

And my question is — is about some of the things I’ve observed here at Davos. It’s a terrific forum. I’ve met lots of people, as usual. I think I’ve been here 30 years. And a lot of the European businesspeople have expressed enormous frustration with the regulatory regime in the EU, and they attribute slower growth rates here because of numerous factors, but especially because of regulations.

And you’ve taken a completely different approach in this area. And if you could explain the theory of what you’re doing, how you’re going to do it, and what you expect the outcome to be, I’d appreciate it.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you very much. And congratulations, Steve — you’re a friend of mine — but on a great career. You have had an amazing career and continues. So, I just want to congratulate you. Very inspirational to a lot of people.

I want to talk about the EU, because you mentioned specifically that I’ve also had a lot of friends and leaders of countries. I’ve gotten to know them all my first term and a little bit during this period of four years and know them well, like them a lot, but they’re very frustrated because of the time everything seems to take to get approved — environmental impact statements for things that you shouldn’t even have to do that, and many, many other ways that it takes.

And I’m going to give you a quick little example. I w- — in the private life, my beautiful private life — before I had all these things happening — the world is a little different — I had a nice, simple life. You knew that.

But when I had that simple life, I did projects, and I had a big project in Ireland, and it had to get approval on something that would have made it even better. And I got the approval from Ireland in a period of a week, and it was a very, very, very efficient, good approval.

And they informed me, though, “The problem is you’re going to have to get it from the EU, and we think that’ll take five to six years.” And I said, “You have to be kidding.” And this was before politics. And I said, “Wait a minute. It’s not that important. I don’t want to go five or six years.” But it would have been a big investment. It would have been nice, and it would have been good for the project.

And I sent the people to the EU to see if they could speed it up, and basically it was a five- or six-year wait just to get a simple approval that Ireland gave me in a period of, literally, not much more than a week.

And I realized right then — that was the first time I really was involved with the EU, but I realized right then, that’s a problem, and I didn’t even bother applying to do it, and — or if I did, I pulled it very quickly. I don’t wa- — I have to be very accurate, because I don’t want to be criticized. “He did apply, actually.” No, I want to be very accurate. So, I don’t think I did, but if I did, I pulled it very quickly. It was just something you — you couldn’t wait five years or six years to get an approval.

So, a lot of — in a very big business sense, a lot of people are — are claiming that’s the problem.

From the standpoint of America, the EU treats us very, very unfairly, very badly. They have a large tax that we know about and — a VAT tax — and it’s a very substantial one. They don’t take our far- — essentially, don’t take our farm products and they don’t take our cars. Yet, they send cars to us by the millions.

They put tariffs on things that we want to do, like, for instance, I think they actually — in terms of these are noneconomic or nonmonetary tariffs, and — and those are very bad, and they make it very difficult to bring products into Europe, and yet they expect to be selling and they do sell their products in the United States.

So, we have, you know, hundreds of billions of dollars of deficits with the EU, and nobody is happy with it. And we’re going to do something about it, but nobody is happy with it. So, I think the EU has to speed up their process.

Friends of mine that are in some of the nations within the EU, great people, they — they want to be able to compete better, and you can’t compete when you can’t get — go through the approval process fast. There’s no reason why it can’t go faster.

So, you know, I’m — I’m trying to be constructive, because I love Europe. I love the countries of Europe. But the process is a very cumbersome one, and th- — and they do treat the United States of America very, very unfairly with the VAT taxes and all of the other taxes they impose.

One other — just to finish up, I got a call from the head of a major airline, one of the biggest airlines in the world. And he said, “Sir, could you help us?” “What?” “Landing in Europe is brutal. They charge us fees for everything, and it’s so unfair.” I said, “How does it compare to China?” He said, “It’s — it’s much worse.”

And the other thing, as you know, they took court cases with Apple, and they supposedly won a case that most people didn’t think was much of a case. They won $15 or $16 billion from Apple. They won billions from Google. I think they’re after Facebook for billions and billions.

These are American companies. Whether you like them or not, they’re — they’re American companies, and they shouldn’t be doing that. And that’s — as far as I’m concerned, it’s a form of taxation.

So, we have some very big complaints with the EU.

Thank you.

MR. BRENDE: Tha- — thank you very much, Mr. President. We’ll now go to one of your friends in the EU, Patrick Pouyanné. He’s the chairman and CEO of TotalEnergies.

I guess you have a question ready, Patrick, for the president.

MR. POUYANNÉ: Mr. President, as we understand, energy is at the top of your agenda, and it’s an honor for me to represent the energy industry tonight in this panel. TotalEnergies is indeed the fourth largest oil and gas and electricity company in the world.

I will not ask you a question about the oil price. It’s quite clear what you expect from us. I will more go to gas more. And we, our company, is the largest, number one exporter LNG from the U.S. company. We are a strong contributor to and we invest in mammoth LNG projects in Texas, $20 billion. It’s far from $200, but it’s $20 billion. And we contribute with that to security of supply to Europe as we export this LNG to Europe.

Some experts fear that if there are too many projects developed in the U.S. on LNG, this could have an inflat- — inflationary impact on the U.S. domestic gas price, and they recommend a pause on these projects.

I would ask you the following question: What are your views on — about such a pause on investments on LNG in the U.S.? What would happen if you would observe an increased domestic gas price because of these exports? And final question, which is important for Europe: Would you agree to guarantee security of supplies of U.S. LNG to Europe?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, on the last part of your question, yes, I would. I would make sure that you get it. If we make a deal, we make a deal; you’ll get it. Because a lot of people do have that problem. They make a deal, and then it can’t get supplied because of war-type problems and other problems. So, we would absolutely do that.

LNG is very interesting, because when I took office for the first term, one of the first things I looked at was two — there were two very massive plants in Louisiana, a state that has been very good to me. I won it by many, many points, and

I felt strongly indebted to it, actually.

And they said there are two plants that have been under environmental consideration for more than 10 years, and they were costing — as you say, you know how expensive those plants are — but they were costing like $12 billion and, I think, $14 or $15 billion. But they couldn’t get their permits. It was — they were in review for years — many, many years — like a decade or more.

And I said, “So ridiculous.” I know so much about that, because in the construction industry, I had to go through it too, but I got good at it after a while.

But I — I went — I saw the projects, and you’re talking about a total investment of $25 to $30 billion, and it looked like it was going to end. They couldn’t get their permits, and I got them done in less than a week. It was done, completed.

In fact, when they called them to announce that it was done, the countries — largely countries — Japan was involved and — and another country and some very big investors — they couldn’t believe it. They actually couldn’t believe it.

And I said, “Just do yourself one favor. Don’t pay any consultants, because the only one that got it done was me.” I got it done because it was the right thing to do for the U.S. and for the world, but the consultants had nothing to do with it, you know? The consultants go in and they say, “Give us millions of dollars because Trump did it.” Nobody called me about it. I just heard it was a problem for years, and I got it done because it was the right thing to do for the U.S. and the right thing to do for beyond. It had to do with energy — very important.

So, I think it’s very important. I think the — the — you know, I disagree with one. I think the more that you do, the lower the price is going to go. And what I’d like to see is rapid approvals.

We’re going to give very rapid approvals in the United States, like with the AI plants, talking to — many people want to build them. That’s going to be a very big thing.

We’re going to build electric generating facilities — they are going to build. I’m going to get them the approval. Under emergency declaration, I can get the approvals done myself without having to go through years of waiting.

And the big problem is we need double the energy we currently have in the United States — can you imagine? — for AI to really be as big as we want to have it. Because it’s a very competitive — it will be very competitive with China and others.

So, I’m going to give emergency declarations so that they can start building them almost immediately.

And I’m — I’m — I think it was largely my idea, because nobody thought this was possible. It wasn’t that they were not smart, because they’re the smartest, but I told them that what I want you to do is build your electric generating plant right next to your plant as a separate building, connected. And they said, “Wow, you’re kidding.” And I said, “No, no. I’m not kidding.” You don’t have to hook into the grid, which is old and, you know, could be taken out. If it’s taken out, they wouldn’t have any way to get any electricity.

So, we are going to allow them to go on a very rapid bas- — basis to build their plant — build the electric generating plant. They can fuel it with anything they want, and they may have coal as a backup. Good, clean coal.

You know, if there were a problem with a — with a pipe coming in — as an example, you’re going with gas — oil or gas — and a pipe gets blown up or, for some reason, doesn’t work, there are some companies in the U.S. that have coal sitting right by the plant so that if there’s an emergency, they can go to that short-term basis and use our very clean coal.

So, that’s something else that a lot of people didn’t even know about. But nothing can destroy coal — not the weather, not a bomb — nothing. It might make it a little smaller, might make it a little different shape. But coal is very strong as a backup. It’s a great backup to have that facility, and it wouldn’t cost much more — more money.

And we have more coal than anybody. We also have more oil and gas than anybody.

So, we’re going to make it so that the plants will have their own electric generating facilities attached right to their plant. They don’t have to worry about a utility. They don’t have to worry about anything. And we’re going to get very rapid approvals.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you. Thank you so much, Mr. President. We’ll now go to another CEO that you know very well: Brian Moynihan, the CEO and chair of Bank of America.

MR. MOYNIHAN: Good afternoon, Mr. President, and congratulations — an obviously eventful week for you and your family.

If you remember, five years ago, you came here and we walked among 150 CEOs from all over the world, and you engaged with them about your policies and your procedures.

This year, you’re not here. And yet this week was eventful, from the orders that you mentioned earlier — literally a wave of orders coming out on immigration, on trade, and many other matters.

And so, as a representative of the United States here,

we got a lot of questions about what does all this mean and how would the president square this with his clear focus on growth, prosperity, market gro- — stock market growth, a good bond market, and bringing down prices.

So, how do you think about the impact of all these orders and how fast they come out and how you’re going to balance them with that scorecard of being successful on both contan- — continuing GDP growth, bringing down inflation, and also having a good stock price appreciation for the American citizen?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think it’s going to actually bring down inflation. It’s going to bring up jobs. We’re going to have a lot of jobs. We’re going to have a lot of companies moving in.

You know, Brian, we’re at 21 percent. It was at 40 percent, and I got it down to 21 percent — the corporate tax. And it was — actually, if you look at state and city, it was, in many cases, much higher than 40 percent. I got it down to 21 percent. And now we’re going to bring it down from 21 to 15 percent if — this is a big “if” — if you make your product in the U.S.

So, we’re going to have the lowest — just about the lowest rate. It will be — the 21 is on the low side worldwide; the 15 is about as low as it gets, and by far the lowest of a large country — a large, you know, rich, powerful country — by far, not even a contest.

So, we’re going to bring it down to 15 percent if you make your product in the USA. So, that’s going to create a — a tremendous buzz.

We’re also probably going back to the one-year deduction, where we deduct — you know, we — we did that originally, and that was amazing what — the impact that that had, the one-year deduction, which built up over a period of time and then it expires. But we’re going to go back to that when we do the renewal of the Trump tax plan.

We have to get Democrats to approve it. But, you know, if the Democrats didn’t approve it, I don’t know how they can survive with about a 45 percent tax increase, because that’s what it would be. And so, I think they’re going to b- — w- — we’ve been working along with them pretty well.

I think it’s very hard for a political group to say, “Let’s charge people 45 percent more.” So, I think we’re in good shape.

But we’re actually doing a reduction for business and small businesses, where you’re going to b- — bring it down to 15 percent, which is really something.

And, by the way, speaking of you — and you’ve done a fantastic job — but I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America. This conserve- — they don’t take conservative business. And I don’t know if the regulators mandated that because of Biden or what, but you and Jamie and everybody, I hope you’re going to open your banks to conservatives, because what you’re doing is wrong.

MR. MOYNIHAN: Mr. President —

MR. BRENDE: (Inaudible.)

MR. MOYNIHAN: — I’ll say that your friend Gianni was — said hello — told me tell you hello, and we look forward to sponsoring the World Cup when it comes, both this summer for the club and next year. So, thank you for getting that for the United States.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Brian.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you, Mr. President. We’ll now go to Ana Botín. She’s the executive chairman of Banco Santander, one of the big European banks and also in the U.S.

So, Ana.

MS. BOTÍN: Mr. President, congratulations on a historic victory.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

MS. BOTÍN: I believe you don’t know me as well as my fellow panelists, so a few words. Santander is one of the largest banks in the world by number of customers, 170 million. That’s more than my friend Brian or my friend Jamie have. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: Wow.

MS. BOTÍN: And those — (applause) —

MR. MOYNIHAN: If they fix the regulation (inaudible).

MS. BOTÍN: That’s coming. That’s coming.

MR. BRENDE: That was cheeky. (Laughter.)

MS. BOTÍN: We are — we are a big investor in the United States. We have many million customer, 12,000 employees. We’re one of the largest auto lenders, and we recently launched a fully digital bank called Openbank.

We strongly believe banks have a pivotal role in the economy, and we can accelerate growth and help many more customers. That’s what we do in the United States. So, as Brian pointed out, we very much welcome your focus on deregulation and reducing bureaucracy.

So, my question is: What are your priorities in this regard, and how fast is this going to happen? Thank you very much.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think it’s going to — thank you and congratulations. I know very much about your bank, and you’ve done a fantastic job. Congratulations.

We are going to move very quickly. We’ve moved very quickly. We’ve done things in the last three days that nobody thought were possible to do in years. And it’s all taken — it’s all taken effect. It’s going to have a huge impact on the economy, a huge positive impact. Money was being wasted on crazy things.

I mean, the Green New Deal was such a total disgrace — what — what — how that was perpetrated. And it was conceived of by people that were average students — less than average students, I might add — and never even took a course in energy or the environment. It was just a game. Remember, the world was going to end in 12 years? Remember that? Well, the 12 years has come and gone. It was going to end. It was going to all foam into earth. But, you know, the time has come.

The — these people — and they — they really — they really scared the Democrats large- — I can’t say the Republicans. Republicans maybe could have fought harder to stop it, but it’s been a tremendous waste of — a tremendous waste of money.

You know, during my four years, we had the cleanest air, we had the cleanest water, and yet we had the most productive economy in the history of our country. We had the most productive economy. Until COVID came, we had the most productive in the history of our country, by far.

And — and actually, you could look worldwide, we — we’re — we were beating everybody from China to everybody else. So — and we think we really — now, with what we have learned and all of the other things that have taken place, we think we can even far surpass that — a- — actually, far, far surpass it. But we do — one thing we’re going to be demanding is we’re going to — be demanding respect from other nations.

Canada. We have a tremendous deficit with Canada. We’re not going to have that anymore. We can’t do it. It’s — it’s — I don’t know if it’s good for them. As you probably know, I say, “You can always become a state, and if you’re a state, we won’t have a deficit. We won’t have to tariff you, et cetera, et cetera.”

But Canada has been very tough to deal with over the years, and it’s not fair that we should have a $200 billion or $250 billion deficit. We don’t need them to make our cars, and they make a lot of them. We don’t need their lumber because we have our own forests, et cetera, et cetera. We don’t need their oil and gas. We have our — we have more than anybody.

So, you know, just as an example, with Mexico — we’re dealing with Mexico, I think, very well. And we’re just — you know, w- — we just want to be treated fairly with other nations, because there’s hardly a nation in the world — and I blame this on us, and I blame it on politicians that for some reason — and probably mostly it’s stupidity, but you could also say other reasons, but mostly stupidity — they’ve allowed other nations to take advantage of the U.S. And w- — we can’t allow that to happen anymore.

You know, we have debt. It’s a very small debt when you compare it to value — the value of the assets that we have, but we don’t want to do that. We want to just have debt be obliterated, and we’ll be able to do that fairly rapidly. And a lot of good things are going to happen.

And — and honestly, good things are going to happen for the world, and good things are going to happen for the people that are dealing with us — allies and beyond allies.

One thing — very important — I really would like to be able to meet with President Putin soon and get that war end — ended, and — and that’s not from the standpoint of economy or anything else. It’s from the standpoint of millions of lives are being wasted. Beautiful, young people are being shot in the battlefield. You know, the bullet — a very flat land, as I said, and the bullet goes — there’s no — there’s no hiding. And a bullet — the only thing going to stop the bullet is a human body. And you have to see — I’ve seen pictures of what’s taken place. It’s a carnage.

And we really have to stop that war. That war is horrible. And I’m not talking economy, I’m not talking economics, I’m not talking about natural resource. I’m just talking about: There’s so many young people being killed in this war, and that’s not including the people that have been killed as the cities are being, you know, knocked down building by building. So, we really should get that stopped.

Likewise, in the Middle East, I think we’ve made a lot of progress in the Middle East, and I think that’s going to — that’s going to come along pretty well.

Thank you very much.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you, Mr. President. We know that most consequential relationship in the world is between the U.S. and China. U.S., 28 percent of the global economy; China close to 20. That’s almost half of the global GDP.

And we know that you called President Xi Jinping last Friday. We heard that you had a good discussion.

How do you see the relationship between the U.S. and China in the next four years under your leadership?

THE PRESIDENT: He called me. But I see it very good. I think that we’re going to have a very good relationship. All we want is fairness. We just want a level playing field. We don’t want to take advantage. We’ve been having massive deficits with China. Biden allowed it to get out of hand. He’s — $1.1 trillion deficit. It’s ridiculous, and it’s just an unfair relationship.

And we have to make it just fair. We don’t have to make it phenomenal. We have to make it a fair relationship. Right now, it’s not a fair relationship. The deficit is massive, as it is with other countries — a lot of Asian countries, actually. But we have deficits that are very big, and we can’t keep doing that, so we’re not going to keep doing that.

But I like President Xi very much. I’ve always liked him. We always had a very good relationship. It was very strained with COVID coming out of Wuhan. Obviously, that strained it. I’m sure it strained it with a lot of people, but that strained our relationship. But we always had a great relationship, I would say, and we look forward to doing very well with China and getting along with China.

Hopefully, China can help us stop the war with, in particular, Russia-Ukraine. And they have a great deal of power over that situation, and we’ll work with them.

And I mentioned that with — during our phone conversation with President Xi, and hopefully we could work together and get that stopped.

We’d like to see denuclearization. In fact, with President Putin, prior to a — an election result, which was, frankly, ridiculous, we were talking about denuclearization of our two countries, and China would have come along. China has a — a much smaller, right now, nuclear armament than us or field than us, but they’re — they’re going to be catching it at some point over the next four or five years.

And I will tell you that President Putin really liked the idea of — of cutting way back on nuclear. And I think the rest of the world, we would have gotten them to follow. And China would have come along too. China also liked it.

Tremendous amounts of money are being spent on nuclear, and the destructive capability is something that we don’t even want to talk about today, because you don’t want to hear it. It’s too depressing.

So, we want to see if we can denuclearize, and I think that’s very possible. And I can tell you that President Putin wanted to do it. He and I wanted to do it. We had a good conversation with China. They would have been involved, and that would have been an unbelievable thing for the planet.

And I hope —

MR. BRENDE: Mr. President, when you’re —

THE PRESIDENT: — it can be started up again.

MR. BRENDE: — back here in Davos next year, will — will there be then a peace agreement with — with Ukraine and Russia by then?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you’re going to have to ask Russia. Ukraine is ready to — to make a deal.

Just so you understand, this is a war that should have never started. If I were president, it would never have started. This is a war that should have never, ever been started. And — and it wasn’t started during my — there was never even talk about it. I knew that it was the apple of President Putin’s eye, but I also knew that there was no way he was going in, and he wasn’t going to go in.

And then, when I was out, bad things happened, bad things were said, a lot of stupidity all around, and you end up with what you have. Now you have all these bombed-out cities — they look like demolition sites — with many people killed.

I think the — the thing that you’ll see about Ukraine is that far — far more people have died than is being reported. And I’ve seen that. But far, far more people have died.

When you look at a city that’s become a demolition site, where big buildings have been collapsed by missiles hitting them and everything else, and they say, “One person was slightly injured.” No, no, many people were killed. Those are big buildings. I was surprised at how — that was my business. These are buildings that go two and three blocks long. They’re 20 stories high. They’re big, powerful buildings. Then they were knocked down, and there were a lot of people in those buildings. They had announced that two people were injured. That’s not true. So, I think you’re going to find that there were many more people killed in Ukraine and the Ukraine war than anybody has any idea.

But if you look now, so many of the — the people being killed are soldiers just facing each other with guns, rifles, and drones — the new form of warfare — drones. And it’s a very sad thing to see.

And when you see pictures of the fields that I see, nobody wants to see it. You’ll never be the same.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you very much, Mr. President. On behalf of all the 3,000 participants here in Davos, we really, really underline that joining us, the third day in your presidency, live, taking questions here, it’s so appreciated. And we are already ready for receiving you next year in person.

So, thank you very much, and all the best from Davos. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DHS Unveils ‘Worst of the Worst’ Webpage Spotlighting Migrants’ Heinous Crimes.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has launched a “Worst of the Worst” webpage to display information on criminal illegal immigrants arrested under the Trump administration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: DHS, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced Monday; site available online.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Today, we launched a ‘worst of the worst’ website so every American can see for themselves the criminal illegal aliens that we are arresting, what crimes they committed, and which communities we removed them from.” – Tricia McLaughlin

🎯IMPACT: The webpage provides transparency on arrests, counters media narratives, and highlights criminal activity by illegal immigrants.

IN FULL

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unveiled a new “Worst of the Worst” webpage on Monday that publicly lists criminal illegal immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement operations. The site lets the public search hundreds of thousands of cases nationwide, spotlighting migrants with serious convictions, including for murder, sexual assault, child molestation, drug trafficking, and gang activity.

“While Americans across the country were enjoying their weekends and holiday shopping, ICE law enforcement was hard at work arresting pedophiles, gang members, and drug traffickers,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. “This holiday season, make sure to thank law enforcement officers for all they do to make America safe again.”

The page launches with details on 10,000 arrests and will be updated regularly. DHS says the initiative, led by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, delivers on President Donald J. Trump’s pledge to prioritize the removal of the most dangerous offenders.

Trump officials accuse corporate media outlets of downplaying the criminal records of those arrested: “As the media whitewashes the facts, day in and day out, our brave men and women of ICE risk their lives for the American people,” McLaughlin stated. “Americans don’t have to rely on the press for this information—with this transparent tool, they can see for themselves what public safety threats were lurking in their neighborhoods and communities.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ABC Renews Kimmel Contract Despite Charlie Kirk Smear Scandal.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: ABC announced a contract extension for Jimmy Kimmel, keeping Jimmy Kimmel Live! on the air through the 2026-2027 TV season.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made in December 2025, with Kimmel’s contract now extended beyond its original May 2026 expiration date.

💬KEY QUOTE: “THANKS FOR WATCHING LIVE!!!” – Jimmy Kimmel.

🎯IMPACT: The extension solidifies Kimmel’s presence in late-night television, despite criticism from Trump and controversy after the host appeared to blame the MAGA movement for the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk.

IN FULL

ABC has renewed Jimmy Kimmel’s contract, securing Jimmy Kimmel Live! through the 2026–2027 television season. The new deal extends beyond Kimmel’s previous agreement, which was due to end in May 2026.

The renewal arrives amid ongoing public friction between Kimmel and President Donald J. Trump, including Kimmel’s brief suspension earlier this year for appearing to blame the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement for the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk. “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel had said. The alleged gunman in the case is, in fact, a leftist who was in a relationship with a transgender.

Trump has previously called for Kimmel to be fired, recently labelling him a “talentless bum.” After ABC broke and returned Kimmel to the airwaves despite the Kirk scandal, the America First leader branded the network a “true bunch of losers,” asking: “Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE.”

Trump also blasted Kimmel during this year’s Kennedy Center Honors.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Jasmine Crockett Joins Texas Senate Contest.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) officially filed paperwork to enter the Democrat primary for the U.S. Senate in Texas.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. Jasmine Crockett and other Texas politicians.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Crockett filed her paperwork on Monday in Texas.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In the past few days, I’ve come to believe that a bruising Senate Democratic primary and runoff would prevent the Democratic Party from going into this critical election unified against the danger posed to our communities and our Constitution by Donald Trump and one of his Republican bootlickers [Ken] Paxton, [John] Cornyn, or Hunt.” – Colin Allred

🎯IMPACT: The Texas Senate race is expected to be one of the most expensive and competitive of the midterms.

IN FULL

Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) formally joined the Democratic U.S. Senate primary in Texas on Monday by submitting her paperwork, stepping in just hours after Rep. Colin Allred ended his Senate bid. Allred announced earlier the same day that he would instead run for the House in the newly created 33rd congressional district.

In the Democratic primary, Crockett will now face state Rep. James Talarico of Austin. On the Republican side, the Republican field includes Republican-in-name-only three-term incumbent Senator John Cornyn, America First state Attorney General Ken Paxton, and Rep. Wesley Hunt. The contest is expected to be one of the most expensive and closely followed Senate races of the 2026 midterms.

Allred explained his withdrawal by saying, “In the past few days, I’ve come to believe that a bruising Senate Democratic primary and runoff would prevent the Democratic Party from going into this critical election unified against the danger posed to our communities and our Constitution by Donald Trump and one of his Republican bootlickers [Ken] Paxton, [John] Cornyn, or [Wesley] Hunt.” He continued, “That’s why I’ve made the difficult decision to end my campaign for the U.S. Senate. But I’m nowhere near done serving my community and our state.”

Crockett, a prominent progressive voice and strident critic of President Donald J. Trump known for her outlandish statements and allegations, had previously said she would only enter the Senate race if polls showed a realistic path to victory in November. Recent surveys reportedly place her ahead in the Democratic primary field.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Prosecutors Take Aim as Scandal Engulfs Dem-Appointed Officials in Somali Fraud Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit intended to feed low-income children in Minnesota, is accused of illegally diverting over $250 million in taxpayer funds for personal luxury purchases, according to federal prosecutors.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE), former MDE leaders Brenda Cassellius and Mary Cathryn Ricker, fraudsters tied to Feeding Our Future, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged fraud occurred between 2018 and 2021 in Minnesota, with key developments during the tenures of Cassellius and Ricker at MDE.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Many of MDE’s complaint investigation procedures and practices were inappropriate or of limited usefulness, particularly in the context of the alleged fraud. While MDE had written complaint investigation procedures, their limited scope and failure to address important issues undermined their ability to promote good investigative practices.” – Minnesota Legislative Auditor’s report.

🎯IMPACT: The alleged fraud highlights systemic failures in oversight, with MDE reportedly increasing payments to Feeding Our Future by 2,800 percent between 2020 and 2021.

IN FULL

Former heads of the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) are under scrutiny as new findings deepen the investigation into the alleged fraud surrounding Feeding Our Future (FOF), a Somali-run nonprofit that was ostensibly providing meals to low-income children. Prosecutors say FOF diverted more than $250 million in taxpayer funds to shell companies and individuals, many of whom used the money for real estate, luxury cars, and other lavish purchases, rather than meals for children.

A 20-page audit from Judy Randall and Katherine Theisen faulted MDE for failing to act on repeated warning signs before and after the pandemic. The report said MDE “did not effectively exercise its authority to hold Feeding Our Future accountable to program requirements,” and was “ill-prepared to respond to the issues it encountered.”

“Many of MDE’s complaint investigation procedures and practices were inappropriate or of limited usefulness, particularly in the context of the alleged fraud. While MDE had written complaint investigation procedures, their limited scope and failure to address important issues undermined their ability to promote good investigative practices,” the report said.

Under former Commissioner Brenda Cassellius, FOF received its initial approval and survived an administrative review in 2018. Her successor, Mary Cathryn Ricker, oversaw the department during the nonprofit’s explosive expansion; in 2020, MDE approved FOF’s summer-food-service application without re-verifying that FOF retained its nonprofit status, even though it had been revoked earlier that year by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Despite receiving at least 30 complaints about FOF’s operations, MDE rarely intervened. In one instance, the department asked FOF to investigate complaints against itself. Meanwhile, FOF’s payments surged, increasing by 2,800 percent between fiscal year 2020 and 2021. The audit also detailed a case in which the nonprofit allegedly demanded a kickback from a vendor; when the vendor declined, their contract was cancelled.

FOF’s outreach and network were deeply rooted in Minnesota’s Somali-American community, which was allegedly shielded from investigation by Minnesota Governor and failed Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz.

Prosecutors have said that many of the companies receiving funds were owned or operated by Somalis. For instance, evidence presented in federal court shows that the nonprofit Somali Community Resettlement Services sponsored several meal-distribution sites in cities like Minneapolis and Faribault, which claimed to serve thousands of meals daily but, prosecutors say, were part of the fraud.

In one case, a site backed by Somali Community Resettlement Services claimed to serve 3,000 meals a day, and another claimed 2,000. That nonprofit was reimbursed about $2.9 million via a sponsoring intermediary, and paid the purported meal-serving entities roughly $1.83 million, keeping nearly $1.1 million itself.

Federal prosecutors—including Joseph Thompson—warn that the problem goes beyond FOF. They say similar fraud has already hit other state-backed programs, such as housing stabilization and autism services. “To be clear, this is not an isolated scheme,” Thompson said.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICEBlock App Files Lawsuit Against Trump Admin for ‘Censorship.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The developer of ICEBlock, an app that tracks U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, has sued the Trump administration for supposed free speech violations after Apple removed the app from its store under government pressure.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: ICEBlock developer Joshua Aaron, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Apple, and the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on Monday in Washington, D.C., following Apple’s removal of the app in October.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We view that as an admission that she engaged in coercion in her official role as a government official to get Apple to remove this app,” said lawyer Noam Biale.

🎯IMPACT: If successful, the lawsuit could see ICEBlock, used to evade and potentially ambush ICE agents, returned to Apple’s app store.

IN FULL

The creator of ICEBlock—an iPhone app that lets users anonymously report and receive alerts about nearby Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity—has sued the Trump administration, claiming it violated the First Amendment. The legal action comes after Apple pulled the app from its App Store in October, which the developer says happened only after direct pressure from the White House.

Attorney General Pam Bondi openly acknowledged the administration’s involvement, saying, “We reached out to Apple today demanding they remove the ICEBlock app from their App Store—and Apple did so.” ICEBlock represents a safety threat to ICE agents, not only helping illegal immigrants evade law enforcement but also potentially providing intelligence for ambush attacks.

The developer’s attorney, Noam Biale, said of Bondi’s comments, “We view that as an admission that she engaged in coercion in her official role as a government official to get Apple to remove this app.”

Developer Joshua Aaron denies the app endangers agents, insisting the tool is peaceful and meant only to share information. “It was just the best idea I had to do everything I could to fight back against what was going on,” Aaron said, calling the administration’s commitment to deporting illegal immigrants, including pedophiles and other dangerous criminals, “abhorrent.”

ICEBlock can no longer be downloaded from Apple’s store, though people who already installed it can still use it. Aaron says the lawsuit aims to get the app reinstated and to deter similar takedowns in the future. “We will take it as far as it needs to go to ensure this never happens again,” Aaron said.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

IAEA: Chernobyl Shield Loses Ability to Contain Radiation After Drone Strike.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The protective shield at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant has been damaged by a drone strike, compromising its ability to contain radioactive material, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukraine has accused Russia of conducting the February drone strike, though the Kremlin denies responsibility. The IAEA conducted the inspection and provided updates.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The drone strike occurred earlier this year at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, located in the Kiev region of Ukraine.

💬KEY QUOTE: The structure has “lost its primary safety functions, including the confinement capability.” – Rafael Grossi, Director of the IAEA.

🎯IMPACT: While radiation levels have not increased, the site requires comprehensive restoration to ensure long-term nuclear safety, the IAEA stated.

IN FULL

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says the protective arch over Chernobyl’s destroyed reactor has been weakened after a drone strike earlier this year, raising new concerns about nuclear safety in a war zone. The February attack, which Ukraine attributes to Russian forces but the Kremlin denies, tore a hole in the outer shell of the steel structure erected in 2016 to contain radioactive material from the 1986 disaster. A brief fire broke out near the reactor, but the inner containment barrier held, and radiation levels did not increase.

IAEA Director Rafael Grossi reported that emergency repairs were completed but warned that the enclosure has “lost its primary safety functions, including the confinement capability.” He urged a full restoration to prevent further deterioration and to maintain long-term safeguards at the site.

Chernobyl remains one of the most sensitive nuclear locations in the region. Russian forces seized the area during the early weeks of the 2022 invasion but withdrew after a month.

Nuclear facilities across Ukraine continue to face risks as the conflict enters its fourth year. Europe’s largest nuclear power plant complex, the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia plant, has endured repeated shelling, fires, and power disruptions. In August 2024, explosions ignited a fire at a cooling tower, with both sides blaming each other. Inspectors later confirmed that radiation levels were unaffected, but the incident reinforced international warnings that continued military activity around the site could trigger a major nuclear emergency. The plant requires stable external power to keep its cooling systems operating, and any prolonged outage could create dangerous conditions.

Amid these escalating concerns, former U.S. National Security Adviser and President Donald J. Trump’s Ukraine envoy, Keith Kellogg, recently emphasized that resolving nuclear safety issues, including stabilizing operations at Zaporizhzhia, is essential to achieving a broader settlement to the conflict. The topic gained further attention after a proposal surfaced in March 2025 in which Donald Trump suggested that the United States assume control of Ukraine’s nuclear-power facilities to secure them from wartime threats. Ukrainian officials rejected the idea as incompatible with national sovereignty, though they acknowledged the need for stronger international involvement in nuclear oversight.

The conflict has also been marked by allegations of sabotage attempts. Russian authorities have claimed that British-trained operatives sought to damage Russian-held nuclear facilities, while Kiev has accused Moscow of staging provocations to justify further military escalation. Both sides deny the accusations leveled against them.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Increases Deportations of Iranians.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has deported another 55 Iranians, according to reports from Iranian and U.S. sources.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. government, Iranian nationals, the Iranian Foreign Ministry, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The deportation flight reportedly departed on Sunday, with Iranians eventually arriving in Tehran via Kuwait.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These individuals announced their willingness for return following continuation of anti-immigration and discriminative policy against foreign nationals particularly Iranians by the United States,” said Iranian Foreign Ministry official Mojtaba Shasti Karimi.

🎯IMPACT: The deportation highlights the Trump administration’s ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration.

IN FULL

Another 55 Iranians have been put on a deportation flight by the Trump administration. The Mizan news agency, affiliated with Iran’s judiciary, quoted Iranian Foreign Ministry official Mojtaba Shasti Karimi, who claimed that “These individuals announced their willingness for return following continuation of anti-immigration and discriminative policy against foreign nationals particularly Iranians by the United States.”

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed, “In the coming days, about 55 nationals will return to Iran… This is the second group being returned to Iran in the latest months.”

Reports indicate that the deportation flight departed on Sunday and included migrants from other nations. Upon landing in Cairo, Egypt, Arab and Russian nationals disembarked, while Iranian nationals continued to Kuwait before transferring to a chartered Kuwait Airways aircraft bound for Tehran.

The deportations align with the Trump administration’s intensified focus on enforcing immigration laws and reversing illegal immigration. They come despite heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with President Donald J. Trump having ordered strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in June.

The Trump administration is on course to set a modern record for deportations by the end of the year, with a further 1.6 million illegal aliens estimated to have self-deported to avoid forcible removal.

Image by Mohammad Ali Marizad.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Chinese Navy Ship Docks Near U.S., Raising Strategic Concerns.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Chinese naval hospital ship, the CNS Silk Road Ark, arrived in the Caribbean as part of Mission Harmony 2025, ostensibly a global medical mission.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy, the Jamaican government, and the U.S. military.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ship arrived in Montego Bay, Jamaica, on December 4, following stops in Nicaragua and the South Pacific.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is… the first time that a Chinese naval hospital ship has docked at multiple ports within the same country to provide medical services since the launch of the Chinese [People’s Liberation Army] Navy’s ‘Harmony Mission’ series of tasks.” – Chinese Defense Ministry

🎯IMPACT: The mission highlights China’s growing influence in the Caribbean as the U.S. also strengthens its military posture in the region.

IN FULL

The Chinese naval hospital ship CNS Silk Road Ark arrived this week in Montego Bay, Jamaica, as part of its 220-day global medical outreach, “Mission Harmony 2025.” The 12-day stop follows damage sustained by the island from Hurricane Melissa in late October. “This is… the first time that a Chinese naval hospital ship has docked at multiple ports within the same country to provide medical services since the launch of the Chinese [People’s Liberation Army] Navy’s ‘Harmony Mission’ series of tasks, and also represents the longest duration of medical services delivered within a single nation,” the Chinese Defense Ministry said.

The Silk Road Ark is on a broader mission, ostensibly delivering humanitarian medical services across Latin America, the Caribbean and the South Pacific, with planned stops including Mexico, Barbados, Brazil, Peru, Chile, and Papua New Guinea—with extending Chinese influence in the region likely its primary goal, rather than humanitarianism.

Beijing’s expanding naval activity lends geopolitical weight to this mission. Recent reporting indicates that the country has deployed more than 100 naval and coast guard vessels across East Asian waters, the largest such mobilization on record, spanning from the Yellow Sea through the East China Sea into the contested South China Sea and the western Pacific. Analysts describe this surge as part of a broader push by the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) to enhance its global reach.

In parallel, China’s shipbuilding capacity has surged dramatically. A recent study by the Office of Naval Intelligence found that Chinese shipyards could produce over 23 million tons of military vessels, more than 200 times the capacity of U.S. yards. This industrial base underpins the PLAN’s rapid expansion and enables Beijing to simultaneously engage in humanitarian “soft power” missions and hard power deployments.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Powerful 7.6 Earthquake Strikes Off Japan, Tsunami Warning Issued.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A major 7.6-magnitude earthquake struck in the North Pacific Ocean near Japan.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.), Japan Meteorological Agency.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday at 11:15 PM. Japan time, approximately 45 miles northeast of Misawa, Japan.

🎯IMPACT: Tsunami warnings issued for parts of Japan’s northeastern coast; potential aftershocks could follow.

IN FULL

A powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6 struck the North Pacific Ocean near Japan on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.). The quake occurred at 11:15 PM local time, with its epicenter located about 45 miles northeast of Misawa, Japan.

Following the tremor, the Japan Meteorological Agency issued tsunami alerts for sections of the country’s northeastern shoreline. Experts are continuing to analyze seismic readings, and the initial magnitude may be updated as more data becomes available.

U.S.G.S. maps indicate that the region experienced shaking at an intensity level of three or higher, categorized as “weak.” It is possible that the earthquake was felt beyond the mapped zones, and additional seismic activity is anticipated.

Aftershocks, smaller quakes that follow a major seismic event, may occur over the span of days, weeks, or even years. These subsequent tremors reflect ongoing adjustments along the fault responsible for the initial slip.

As of Monday, December 8, at 11:33 PM Japan time, updated shaking information was still being compiled, and more details about future aftershocks, including their strength and locations, are expected to be released.

Image by z tanuki.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. to Ease AI Chip Export Restrictions to China in New Compromise Plan.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to allow the export of Nvidia GPUs that are 18 months behind the most advanced versions to China.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Nvidia, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime.

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 8, 2025, in the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “China has many advantages in the AI race and the disparity in computing resources stands out as almost certainly the largest single advantage that the United States enjoys over China. Two senior executives in key Chinese AI firms have explicitly stated that lack of access to advanced AI chips is the most significant challenge that they face.” – Greg Allen, Center for Strategic and International Studies

🎯IMPACT: The decision could open up a significant market for Nvidia, but potentially undermines U.S. leadership in the tech sector over the longer term.

IN FULL

The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to permit exports of Nvidia’s H200 GPUs to China soon. These processors lag about 18 months behind the company’s cutting-edge models, in a move intended to strike a balance between parties that want to ban all sales of high-end artifical intelligence (AI) chips to the communist state and those concerned that overly stringent controls would merely cede the market to domestic Chinese rivals.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick supports hopes the deal will substantially increase Nvidia’s earnings by tapping into China’s massive customer base. The goal is to keep American technology as the worldwide benchmark while easing Beijing’s objections to being stuck with too-weak alternative chips, such as Nvidia’s H20.

Previously, the U.S. implemented tough export controls to hinder China’s AI development. Yet certain White House officials argue that the measures have fallen short, given ongoing advances by firms like DeepSeek and Alibaba.

In testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee, Greg Allen of the Center for Strategic and International Studies stressed the vital role of export controls in preserving U.S. superiority in AI. He warned that without them, China could potentially build the first million-chip AI cluster. “China has many advantages in the AI race and the disparity in computing resources stands out as almost certainly the largest single advantage that the United States enjoys over China. Two senior executives in key Chinese AI firms have explicitly stated that lack of access to advanced AI chips is the most significant challenge that they face,” he stressed.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.