Friday, July 24, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICYMI: Trump’s Full Speech to Globalist World Economic Forum in Davos.

President Donald J. Trump made a virtual appearance at the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland on Thursday, drawing battle lines by emphasizing national sovereignty, rejecting its climate agenda, and threatening the European Union (EU) on trade.

READ:

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much, Klaus [Schwab]. And hello to everyone in beautiful Davos.

This has been a truly historic week in the United States. Three days ago, I took the oath of office, and we began the golden age of America. The recent presidential election was won by millions of votes and all seven — every one of them — all seven swing states. It was a massive mandate from the American people like hasn’t been seen in many years. And some of the political pundits, even some of my so-called enemies, said it was the most consequential election victory in 129 years. That’s quite nice.

What the world has witnessed in the past 72 hours is nothing less than a revolution of common sense. Our country will soon be stronger, wealthier, and more united than ever before, and the entire planet will be more peaceful and prosperous as a result of this incredible momentum and what we’re doing and going to do.

My administration is acting with unprecedented speed to fix the disasters we’ve inherited from a totally inept group of people and to solve every single crisis facing our country.

This begins with confronting the economic chaos caused by the failed policies of the last administration. Over the past four years, our government racked up $8 trillion in wasteful deficit spending and inflicted nation-wrecking energy restrictions, crippling regulations, and hidden taxes like never before. The result is the worst inflation crisis in modern history and sky-high interest rates for our citizens and even throughout the world. Food prices and the price of almost every other thing known to mankind went through the roof.

President Biden totally lost control of what was going on in our country but, in particular, with our high-inflation economy and at our border. Because of these ruinous policies, total government spending this year is $1.5 trillion higher than was projected to occur when I left office just four years ago. Likewise, the cost of servicing the debt is more than 230 percent higher than was projected in 2020.

The inflation rate we are inheriting remains 50 percent higher than the historic target. It was the highest inflation probably in the history of our country. That’s why, from the moment I took office, I’ve taken rapid action to reverse each and every one of these radical left policies that created this calamity — in particular, with immigration, crime, and inflation.

On day one, I signed an executive order directing every member of my Cabinet to marshal all powers at their disposal to defeat inflation and reduce the cost of daily life. I imposed a federal hiring freeze, a federal regulation freeze, a foreign aid freeze, and I created the new Department of Government Efficiency.

I terminated the ridiculous and incredibly wasteful Green New Deal — I call it the “Green New Scam”; withdrew from the one-sided Paris Climate Accord; and ended the insane and costly electric vehicle mandate. We’re going to let people buy the car they want to buy.

I declared a national em- — energy emergency — and it’s so important — national energy emergency to unlock the liquid gold under our feet and pave the way for rapid approvals of new energy infrastructure. The United States has the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we’re going to use it.

Not only will this reduce the cost of virtually all goods and services, it will make the United States a manufacturing superpower and the world capital of artificial intelligence and crypto.

My administration has also begun the largest deregulation campaign in history, far exceeding even the record-setting efforts of my last term.

In total, the Biden administration imposed $50,000 in additional regulatory costs on the average American household over the last four years. I have promised to eliminate 10 old regulations for every new regulation, which will soon put many thousands of dollars back in the pockets of American families.

To further unleash our economy, our majorities in the House and Senate — which we also took, along with the presidency — are going to pass the largest tax cut in American history, including massive tax cuts for workers and family and big tax cuts for domestic producers and manufacturers. And we’re working with the Democrats on getting an extension of the original Trump tax cuts, as you probably know by just reading any paper.

My message to every business in the world is very simple: Come make your product in America, and we will give you among the lowest taxes of any nation on Earth. We’re bringing them down very substantially, even from the original Trump tax cuts. But if you don’t make your product in America, which is your prerogative, then, very simply, you will have to pay a tariff — differing amounts, but a tariff — which will direct hundreds of billions of dollars and even trillions of dollars into our Treasury to strengthen our economy and pay down debt.

Under the Trump administration, there will be no better place on Earth to create jobs, build factories, or grow a company than right here in the good old USA.

Already, American’s economic — and you can see this, I think, maybe even in your — in your wonderful, wonderful room that you’re all gathered together — so many of my friends — but, Americans, the economic confidence is soaring like we haven’t seen in many, many decades, maybe not at all.

Upon my election, it was just announced that small-business optimism skyrocketed by 41 points in a single month. That’s the highest ever. There’s never been anything like that.

SoftBank has announced between a $100 and $200 billion investment in the U.S. economy because of the election result. And just two days ago, Oracle, SoftBank, and OpenAI announced a $500 billion investment in AI infrastructure. Other companies, likewise, have announced billions and billions and billions — adding up to trillions — of investment in America, in the United States.

And it’s also reported today in the papers that Saudi Arabia will be investing at least $600 billion in America. But I’ll be asking the crown prince, who’s a fantastic guy, to round it out to around $1 trillion. I think they’ll do that because we’ve been very good to them. And I’m also going to ask Saudi Arabia and OPEC to bring down the cost of oil. You got to bring it down, which, frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t do before the election. That didn’t show a lot of love by them not doing it. I was a little surprised by that.

If the price came down, the Russia-Ukraine war would end immediately. Right now, the price is high enough that that war will continue. You got to bring down the oil price; you’re going to end that war. They should have done it long ago. They’re very responsible, actually, to a certain extent, for what’s taking place — millions of lives are being lost.

With oil prices going down, I’ll demand that interest rates drop immediately. And, likewise, they should be dropping all over the world. Interest rates should follow us.

All over, the progress that you’re seeing is happening because of our historic victory in a recent presidential election, one that has become quite well known throughout the world.

I think a lot of things are happening to a lot of countries. They say that there’s light shining all over the world since the election. And even countries that we aren’t particularly friendly with are happy because they understand what — there is a future and th- — how great the future will be.

Under our leadership, America is back and open for business. And this week, I’m also taking swift action to stop the invasion at our southern border. They allowed people to come in at levels that nobody has ever seen before. It was ridiculous. I decided a — and declared to dec- — to — to do — and very, very importantly — a national emergency on our border; immediately halted all entry of illegal border crossers, of which there were many; and began properly returning the illegal trespassers back to the place from which they came.

That action, as you’ve probably seen, has already started very strongly. I have deployed active-duty U.S. military and National Guard troops to the border to assist in repelling the invasion. It was really an invasion. We will not allow our territory to be violated.

After four long years, the United States is strong and sovereign and a beautiful nation once again. It’s a strong, sovereign nation.

In addition, I’m pleased to report that America is also a free nation once again. On day one, I signed an executive order to stop all government censorship. No longer will our government label the speech of our own citizens as misinformation or disinformation, which are the favorite words of censors and those who wish to stop the free exchange of ideas and, frankly, progress. We have saved free speech in America, and we’ve saved it strongly.

With another historic executive order this week, I also ended the weaponization of law enforcement against the American people — and, frankly, against politicians — and restored the fair, equal, and impartial rule of law.

My administration has taken action to abolish all discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion nonsense — and these are policies that were absolute nonsense — throughout the government and the private sector. With the recent, yet somewhat unexpected, great Supreme Court decision just made, America will once again become a merit-based country. You have to hear that word: merit-based country.

And I’ve made it official — an official policy of the United States that there are only two genders, male and female, and we will have no men participating in women’s sports, and transgender operations, which became the rage, will occur very rarely.

Finally, as we restore common sense in America, we’re moving quickly to bring back strength and peace and stability abroad. I’m also going to ask all NATO nations to increase defense spending to 5 percent of GDP, which is what it should have been years ago — it was only at 2 percent, and most nations didn’t pay until I came along; I insisted that they pay, and they did — because the United States was really paying the difference at that time, and it’s — it was unfair to the United States. But many, many things have been unfair for many years to the United States.

Before even taking office, my team negotiated a ceasefire agreement in the Middle East, which wouldn’t have happened without us, as I think most of the people in the room know. Earlier this week, the hostages began to return to their families. They are returning, and it’s a beautiful sight. And they’ll be coming in more and more. They started coming back on Sunday.

Our efforts to secure a peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine are now, hopefully, underway. It’s so important to get that done. That is an absolute killing field.

Millions of soldiers are being killed. Nobody has seen anything like it since World War II. They’re laying dead all over the flat fields. It’s a flat field — farmland, and there’s millions of Russians and millions of Ukrainians. Nobody’s seen anything like it since World War II. It’s time to end it.

And here in America, we have big events coming up. Next year we have the 250th anniversary of America’s founding. I’m so honored to be president during that. That’s been a big event. They’ve been talking about it for 10 years. We also have the World Cup, and I understand Gianni — Gianni is in the room — Infantino. He was very instrumental in helping us get it — he’s there with you someplace, I think — and I want to thank him for that.

And then we have the Olympics coming up, which I was instrumental in getting, also, in my first term. And who would have known that by skipping a term, I would get the Olympics? I was upset. I said, “You know, I got the Olympics to come and I won’t be president.” But it turned out, through a stroke of luck or whatever you might call it, that I’m going to be president during the World Cup and the Olympics and the 250th

anniversary. So, that’s going to be three big events.

And we’ve accomplished more in less than four days — we have really been working — four days — than other administrations have accomplished in four years, and we’re just getting started. It’s really an amazing thing to see, and the spirit and the light over our country has been incredible.

Under the last administration, our nation has suffered greatly, but we are going to bring it back and make it greater, bigger, stronger, better than ever before.

I want to thank everybody for being with you. I would have been there myself, except the inauguration was two days ago. I thought it might be a little bit quick to make it the first stop, but we’ll get there one day. We hope to get there.

But I — I do appreciate — I heard the audience is fantastic, and many of my friends are in the audience. And I will be taking questions now from some very distinguished people.

Thank you all very much. (Applause.)

MR. BRENDE: Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. President, for that very powerful speech, and I think you could hear the applause all the way from Davos to the White House. But next year, it will be even better, because then you can get the applause here in Davos. So, we wish you welcome to our village next year. We hope to see you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much.

MR. BRENDE: So, we also know, Mr. President, that you open up for interaction here. We have a great panel with some of the most distinguished businesspeople in the world.

Let me start with someone that you know really well, that I think is almost a neighbor of you in Mal-a- — in — in Florida, Mr. Steve Schwarzman, chairman, CEO, and cofounder of Blackstone Group.

So, Steve, floor is yours.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: Well, Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Steve.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: — I’m sure the crown prince of Saudi Arabia will be really glad you gave this speech today. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: I hope so.

MR. SCHWARZMAN: You’ve had the busiest four days that anybody can imagine, and congratulations for that.

And my question is — is about some of the things I’ve observed here at Davos. It’s a terrific forum. I’ve met lots of people, as usual. I think I’ve been here 30 years. And a lot of the European businesspeople have expressed enormous frustration with the regulatory regime in the EU, and they attribute slower growth rates here because of numerous factors, but especially because of regulations.

And you’ve taken a completely different approach in this area. And if you could explain the theory of what you’re doing, how you’re going to do it, and what you expect the outcome to be, I’d appreciate it.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you very much. And congratulations, Steve — you’re a friend of mine — but on a great career. You have had an amazing career and continues. So, I just want to congratulate you. Very inspirational to a lot of people.

I want to talk about the EU, because you mentioned specifically that I’ve also had a lot of friends and leaders of countries. I’ve gotten to know them all my first term and a little bit during this period of four years and know them well, like them a lot, but they’re very frustrated because of the time everything seems to take to get approved — environmental impact statements for things that you shouldn’t even have to do that, and many, many other ways that it takes.

And I’m going to give you a quick little example. I w- — in the private life, my beautiful private life — before I had all these things happening — the world is a little different — I had a nice, simple life. You knew that.

But when I had that simple life, I did projects, and I had a big project in Ireland, and it had to get approval on something that would have made it even better. And I got the approval from Ireland in a period of a week, and it was a very, very, very efficient, good approval.

And they informed me, though, “The problem is you’re going to have to get it from the EU, and we think that’ll take five to six years.” And I said, “You have to be kidding.” And this was before politics. And I said, “Wait a minute. It’s not that important. I don’t want to go five or six years.” But it would have been a big investment. It would have been nice, and it would have been good for the project.

And I sent the people to the EU to see if they could speed it up, and basically it was a five- or six-year wait just to get a simple approval that Ireland gave me in a period of, literally, not much more than a week.

And I realized right then — that was the first time I really was involved with the EU, but I realized right then, that’s a problem, and I didn’t even bother applying to do it, and — or if I did, I pulled it very quickly. I don’t wa- — I have to be very accurate, because I don’t want to be criticized. “He did apply, actually.” No, I want to be very accurate. So, I don’t think I did, but if I did, I pulled it very quickly. It was just something you — you couldn’t wait five years or six years to get an approval.

So, a lot of — in a very big business sense, a lot of people are — are claiming that’s the problem.

From the standpoint of America, the EU treats us very, very unfairly, very badly. They have a large tax that we know about and — a VAT tax — and it’s a very substantial one. They don’t take our far- — essentially, don’t take our farm products and they don’t take our cars. Yet, they send cars to us by the millions.

They put tariffs on things that we want to do, like, for instance, I think they actually — in terms of these are noneconomic or nonmonetary tariffs, and — and those are very bad, and they make it very difficult to bring products into Europe, and yet they expect to be selling and they do sell their products in the United States.

So, we have, you know, hundreds of billions of dollars of deficits with the EU, and nobody is happy with it. And we’re going to do something about it, but nobody is happy with it. So, I think the EU has to speed up their process.

Friends of mine that are in some of the nations within the EU, great people, they — they want to be able to compete better, and you can’t compete when you can’t get — go through the approval process fast. There’s no reason why it can’t go faster.

So, you know, I’m — I’m trying to be constructive, because I love Europe. I love the countries of Europe. But the process is a very cumbersome one, and th- — and they do treat the United States of America very, very unfairly with the VAT taxes and all of the other taxes they impose.

One other — just to finish up, I got a call from the head of a major airline, one of the biggest airlines in the world. And he said, “Sir, could you help us?” “What?” “Landing in Europe is brutal. They charge us fees for everything, and it’s so unfair.” I said, “How does it compare to China?” He said, “It’s — it’s much worse.”

And the other thing, as you know, they took court cases with Apple, and they supposedly won a case that most people didn’t think was much of a case. They won $15 or $16 billion from Apple. They won billions from Google. I think they’re after Facebook for billions and billions.

These are American companies. Whether you like them or not, they’re — they’re American companies, and they shouldn’t be doing that. And that’s — as far as I’m concerned, it’s a form of taxation.

So, we have some very big complaints with the EU.

Thank you.

MR. BRENDE: Tha- — thank you very much, Mr. President. We’ll now go to one of your friends in the EU, Patrick Pouyanné. He’s the chairman and CEO of TotalEnergies.

I guess you have a question ready, Patrick, for the president.

MR. POUYANNÉ: Mr. President, as we understand, energy is at the top of your agenda, and it’s an honor for me to represent the energy industry tonight in this panel. TotalEnergies is indeed the fourth largest oil and gas and electricity company in the world.

I will not ask you a question about the oil price. It’s quite clear what you expect from us. I will more go to gas more. And we, our company, is the largest, number one exporter LNG from the U.S. company. We are a strong contributor to and we invest in mammoth LNG projects in Texas, $20 billion. It’s far from $200, but it’s $20 billion. And we contribute with that to security of supply to Europe as we export this LNG to Europe.

Some experts fear that if there are too many projects developed in the U.S. on LNG, this could have an inflat- — inflationary impact on the U.S. domestic gas price, and they recommend a pause on these projects.

I would ask you the following question: What are your views on — about such a pause on investments on LNG in the U.S.? What would happen if you would observe an increased domestic gas price because of these exports? And final question, which is important for Europe: Would you agree to guarantee security of supplies of U.S. LNG to Europe?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, on the last part of your question, yes, I would. I would make sure that you get it. If we make a deal, we make a deal; you’ll get it. Because a lot of people do have that problem. They make a deal, and then it can’t get supplied because of war-type problems and other problems. So, we would absolutely do that.

LNG is very interesting, because when I took office for the first term, one of the first things I looked at was two — there were two very massive plants in Louisiana, a state that has been very good to me. I won it by many, many points, and

I felt strongly indebted to it, actually.

And they said there are two plants that have been under environmental consideration for more than 10 years, and they were costing — as you say, you know how expensive those plants are — but they were costing like $12 billion and, I think, $14 or $15 billion. But they couldn’t get their permits. It was — they were in review for years — many, many years — like a decade or more.

And I said, “So ridiculous.” I know so much about that, because in the construction industry, I had to go through it too, but I got good at it after a while.

But I — I went — I saw the projects, and you’re talking about a total investment of $25 to $30 billion, and it looked like it was going to end. They couldn’t get their permits, and I got them done in less than a week. It was done, completed.

In fact, when they called them to announce that it was done, the countries — largely countries — Japan was involved and — and another country and some very big investors — they couldn’t believe it. They actually couldn’t believe it.

And I said, “Just do yourself one favor. Don’t pay any consultants, because the only one that got it done was me.” I got it done because it was the right thing to do for the U.S. and for the world, but the consultants had nothing to do with it, you know? The consultants go in and they say, “Give us millions of dollars because Trump did it.” Nobody called me about it. I just heard it was a problem for years, and I got it done because it was the right thing to do for the U.S. and the right thing to do for beyond. It had to do with energy — very important.

So, I think it’s very important. I think the — the — you know, I disagree with one. I think the more that you do, the lower the price is going to go. And what I’d like to see is rapid approvals.

We’re going to give very rapid approvals in the United States, like with the AI plants, talking to — many people want to build them. That’s going to be a very big thing.

We’re going to build electric generating facilities — they are going to build. I’m going to get them the approval. Under emergency declaration, I can get the approvals done myself without having to go through years of waiting.

And the big problem is we need double the energy we currently have in the United States — can you imagine? — for AI to really be as big as we want to have it. Because it’s a very competitive — it will be very competitive with China and others.

So, I’m going to give emergency declarations so that they can start building them almost immediately.

And I’m — I’m — I think it was largely my idea, because nobody thought this was possible. It wasn’t that they were not smart, because they’re the smartest, but I told them that what I want you to do is build your electric generating plant right next to your plant as a separate building, connected. And they said, “Wow, you’re kidding.” And I said, “No, no. I’m not kidding.” You don’t have to hook into the grid, which is old and, you know, could be taken out. If it’s taken out, they wouldn’t have any way to get any electricity.

So, we are going to allow them to go on a very rapid bas- — basis to build their plant — build the electric generating plant. They can fuel it with anything they want, and they may have coal as a backup. Good, clean coal.

You know, if there were a problem with a — with a pipe coming in — as an example, you’re going with gas — oil or gas — and a pipe gets blown up or, for some reason, doesn’t work, there are some companies in the U.S. that have coal sitting right by the plant so that if there’s an emergency, they can go to that short-term basis and use our very clean coal.

So, that’s something else that a lot of people didn’t even know about. But nothing can destroy coal — not the weather, not a bomb — nothing. It might make it a little smaller, might make it a little different shape. But coal is very strong as a backup. It’s a great backup to have that facility, and it wouldn’t cost much more — more money.

And we have more coal than anybody. We also have more oil and gas than anybody.

So, we’re going to make it so that the plants will have their own electric generating facilities attached right to their plant. They don’t have to worry about a utility. They don’t have to worry about anything. And we’re going to get very rapid approvals.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you. Thank you so much, Mr. President. We’ll now go to another CEO that you know very well: Brian Moynihan, the CEO and chair of Bank of America.

MR. MOYNIHAN: Good afternoon, Mr. President, and congratulations — an obviously eventful week for you and your family.

If you remember, five years ago, you came here and we walked among 150 CEOs from all over the world, and you engaged with them about your policies and your procedures.

This year, you’re not here. And yet this week was eventful, from the orders that you mentioned earlier — literally a wave of orders coming out on immigration, on trade, and many other matters.

And so, as a representative of the United States here,

we got a lot of questions about what does all this mean and how would the president square this with his clear focus on growth, prosperity, market gro- — stock market growth, a good bond market, and bringing down prices.

So, how do you think about the impact of all these orders and how fast they come out and how you’re going to balance them with that scorecard of being successful on both contan- — continuing GDP growth, bringing down inflation, and also having a good stock price appreciation for the American citizen?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think it’s going to actually bring down inflation. It’s going to bring up jobs. We’re going to have a lot of jobs. We’re going to have a lot of companies moving in.

You know, Brian, we’re at 21 percent. It was at 40 percent, and I got it down to 21 percent — the corporate tax. And it was — actually, if you look at state and city, it was, in many cases, much higher than 40 percent. I got it down to 21 percent. And now we’re going to bring it down from 21 to 15 percent if — this is a big “if” — if you make your product in the U.S.

So, we’re going to have the lowest — just about the lowest rate. It will be — the 21 is on the low side worldwide; the 15 is about as low as it gets, and by far the lowest of a large country — a large, you know, rich, powerful country — by far, not even a contest.

So, we’re going to bring it down to 15 percent if you make your product in the USA. So, that’s going to create a — a tremendous buzz.

We’re also probably going back to the one-year deduction, where we deduct — you know, we — we did that originally, and that was amazing what — the impact that that had, the one-year deduction, which built up over a period of time and then it expires. But we’re going to go back to that when we do the renewal of the Trump tax plan.

We have to get Democrats to approve it. But, you know, if the Democrats didn’t approve it, I don’t know how they can survive with about a 45 percent tax increase, because that’s what it would be. And so, I think they’re going to b- — w- — we’ve been working along with them pretty well.

I think it’s very hard for a political group to say, “Let’s charge people 45 percent more.” So, I think we’re in good shape.

But we’re actually doing a reduction for business and small businesses, where you’re going to b- — bring it down to 15 percent, which is really something.

And, by the way, speaking of you — and you’ve done a fantastic job — but I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America. This conserve- — they don’t take conservative business. And I don’t know if the regulators mandated that because of Biden or what, but you and Jamie and everybody, I hope you’re going to open your banks to conservatives, because what you’re doing is wrong.

MR. MOYNIHAN: Mr. President —

MR. BRENDE: (Inaudible.)

MR. MOYNIHAN: — I’ll say that your friend Gianni was — said hello — told me tell you hello, and we look forward to sponsoring the World Cup when it comes, both this summer for the club and next year. So, thank you for getting that for the United States.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Brian.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you, Mr. President. We’ll now go to Ana Botín. She’s the executive chairman of Banco Santander, one of the big European banks and also in the U.S.

So, Ana.

MS. BOTÍN: Mr. President, congratulations on a historic victory.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

MS. BOTÍN: I believe you don’t know me as well as my fellow panelists, so a few words. Santander is one of the largest banks in the world by number of customers, 170 million. That’s more than my friend Brian or my friend Jamie have. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: Wow.

MS. BOTÍN: And those — (applause) —

MR. MOYNIHAN: If they fix the regulation (inaudible).

MS. BOTÍN: That’s coming. That’s coming.

MR. BRENDE: That was cheeky. (Laughter.)

MS. BOTÍN: We are — we are a big investor in the United States. We have many million customer, 12,000 employees. We’re one of the largest auto lenders, and we recently launched a fully digital bank called Openbank.

We strongly believe banks have a pivotal role in the economy, and we can accelerate growth and help many more customers. That’s what we do in the United States. So, as Brian pointed out, we very much welcome your focus on deregulation and reducing bureaucracy.

So, my question is: What are your priorities in this regard, and how fast is this going to happen? Thank you very much.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think it’s going to — thank you and congratulations. I know very much about your bank, and you’ve done a fantastic job. Congratulations.

We are going to move very quickly. We’ve moved very quickly. We’ve done things in the last three days that nobody thought were possible to do in years. And it’s all taken — it’s all taken effect. It’s going to have a huge impact on the economy, a huge positive impact. Money was being wasted on crazy things.

I mean, the Green New Deal was such a total disgrace — what — what — how that was perpetrated. And it was conceived of by people that were average students — less than average students, I might add — and never even took a course in energy or the environment. It was just a game. Remember, the world was going to end in 12 years? Remember that? Well, the 12 years has come and gone. It was going to end. It was going to all foam into earth. But, you know, the time has come.

The — these people — and they — they really — they really scared the Democrats large- — I can’t say the Republicans. Republicans maybe could have fought harder to stop it, but it’s been a tremendous waste of — a tremendous waste of money.

You know, during my four years, we had the cleanest air, we had the cleanest water, and yet we had the most productive economy in the history of our country. We had the most productive economy. Until COVID came, we had the most productive in the history of our country, by far.

And — and actually, you could look worldwide, we — we’re — we were beating everybody from China to everybody else. So — and we think we really — now, with what we have learned and all of the other things that have taken place, we think we can even far surpass that — a- — actually, far, far surpass it. But we do — one thing we’re going to be demanding is we’re going to — be demanding respect from other nations.

Canada. We have a tremendous deficit with Canada. We’re not going to have that anymore. We can’t do it. It’s — it’s — I don’t know if it’s good for them. As you probably know, I say, “You can always become a state, and if you’re a state, we won’t have a deficit. We won’t have to tariff you, et cetera, et cetera.”

But Canada has been very tough to deal with over the years, and it’s not fair that we should have a $200 billion or $250 billion deficit. We don’t need them to make our cars, and they make a lot of them. We don’t need their lumber because we have our own forests, et cetera, et cetera. We don’t need their oil and gas. We have our — we have more than anybody.

So, you know, just as an example, with Mexico — we’re dealing with Mexico, I think, very well. And we’re just — you know, w- — we just want to be treated fairly with other nations, because there’s hardly a nation in the world — and I blame this on us, and I blame it on politicians that for some reason — and probably mostly it’s stupidity, but you could also say other reasons, but mostly stupidity — they’ve allowed other nations to take advantage of the U.S. And w- — we can’t allow that to happen anymore.

You know, we have debt. It’s a very small debt when you compare it to value — the value of the assets that we have, but we don’t want to do that. We want to just have debt be obliterated, and we’ll be able to do that fairly rapidly. And a lot of good things are going to happen.

And — and honestly, good things are going to happen for the world, and good things are going to happen for the people that are dealing with us — allies and beyond allies.

One thing — very important — I really would like to be able to meet with President Putin soon and get that war end — ended, and — and that’s not from the standpoint of economy or anything else. It’s from the standpoint of millions of lives are being wasted. Beautiful, young people are being shot in the battlefield. You know, the bullet — a very flat land, as I said, and the bullet goes — there’s no — there’s no hiding. And a bullet — the only thing going to stop the bullet is a human body. And you have to see — I’ve seen pictures of what’s taken place. It’s a carnage.

And we really have to stop that war. That war is horrible. And I’m not talking economy, I’m not talking economics, I’m not talking about natural resource. I’m just talking about: There’s so many young people being killed in this war, and that’s not including the people that have been killed as the cities are being, you know, knocked down building by building. So, we really should get that stopped.

Likewise, in the Middle East, I think we’ve made a lot of progress in the Middle East, and I think that’s going to — that’s going to come along pretty well.

Thank you very much.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you, Mr. President. We know that most consequential relationship in the world is between the U.S. and China. U.S., 28 percent of the global economy; China close to 20. That’s almost half of the global GDP.

And we know that you called President Xi Jinping last Friday. We heard that you had a good discussion.

How do you see the relationship between the U.S. and China in the next four years under your leadership?

THE PRESIDENT: He called me. But I see it very good. I think that we’re going to have a very good relationship. All we want is fairness. We just want a level playing field. We don’t want to take advantage. We’ve been having massive deficits with China. Biden allowed it to get out of hand. He’s — $1.1 trillion deficit. It’s ridiculous, and it’s just an unfair relationship.

And we have to make it just fair. We don’t have to make it phenomenal. We have to make it a fair relationship. Right now, it’s not a fair relationship. The deficit is massive, as it is with other countries — a lot of Asian countries, actually. But we have deficits that are very big, and we can’t keep doing that, so we’re not going to keep doing that.

But I like President Xi very much. I’ve always liked him. We always had a very good relationship. It was very strained with COVID coming out of Wuhan. Obviously, that strained it. I’m sure it strained it with a lot of people, but that strained our relationship. But we always had a great relationship, I would say, and we look forward to doing very well with China and getting along with China.

Hopefully, China can help us stop the war with, in particular, Russia-Ukraine. And they have a great deal of power over that situation, and we’ll work with them.

And I mentioned that with — during our phone conversation with President Xi, and hopefully we could work together and get that stopped.

We’d like to see denuclearization. In fact, with President Putin, prior to a — an election result, which was, frankly, ridiculous, we were talking about denuclearization of our two countries, and China would have come along. China has a — a much smaller, right now, nuclear armament than us or field than us, but they’re — they’re going to be catching it at some point over the next four or five years.

And I will tell you that President Putin really liked the idea of — of cutting way back on nuclear. And I think the rest of the world, we would have gotten them to follow. And China would have come along too. China also liked it.

Tremendous amounts of money are being spent on nuclear, and the destructive capability is something that we don’t even want to talk about today, because you don’t want to hear it. It’s too depressing.

So, we want to see if we can denuclearize, and I think that’s very possible. And I can tell you that President Putin wanted to do it. He and I wanted to do it. We had a good conversation with China. They would have been involved, and that would have been an unbelievable thing for the planet.

And I hope —

MR. BRENDE: Mr. President, when you’re —

THE PRESIDENT: — it can be started up again.

MR. BRENDE: — back here in Davos next year, will — will there be then a peace agreement with — with Ukraine and Russia by then?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you’re going to have to ask Russia. Ukraine is ready to — to make a deal.

Just so you understand, this is a war that should have never started. If I were president, it would never have started. This is a war that should have never, ever been started. And — and it wasn’t started during my — there was never even talk about it. I knew that it was the apple of President Putin’s eye, but I also knew that there was no way he was going in, and he wasn’t going to go in.

And then, when I was out, bad things happened, bad things were said, a lot of stupidity all around, and you end up with what you have. Now you have all these bombed-out cities — they look like demolition sites — with many people killed.

I think the — the thing that you’ll see about Ukraine is that far — far more people have died than is being reported. And I’ve seen that. But far, far more people have died.

When you look at a city that’s become a demolition site, where big buildings have been collapsed by missiles hitting them and everything else, and they say, “One person was slightly injured.” No, no, many people were killed. Those are big buildings. I was surprised at how — that was my business. These are buildings that go two and three blocks long. They’re 20 stories high. They’re big, powerful buildings. Then they were knocked down, and there were a lot of people in those buildings. They had announced that two people were injured. That’s not true. So, I think you’re going to find that there were many more people killed in Ukraine and the Ukraine war than anybody has any idea.

But if you look now, so many of the — the people being killed are soldiers just facing each other with guns, rifles, and drones — the new form of warfare — drones. And it’s a very sad thing to see.

And when you see pictures of the fields that I see, nobody wants to see it. You’ll never be the same.

MR. BRENDE: Thank you very much, Mr. President. On behalf of all the 3,000 participants here in Davos, we really, really underline that joining us, the third day in your presidency, live, taking questions here, it’s so appreciated. And we are already ready for receiving you next year in person.

So, thank you very much, and all the best from Davos. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ Challenges Dem City’s Ban on Masked Federal Agents.

The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the city of Milwaukee’s ban on masked law enforcement, citing federal supremacy and unconstitutional local interference with federal agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Milwaukee, Wisconsin, over its ban on law enforcement officers wearing masks.
📺 DETAIL: The DOJ asserts that the city’s mask ban violates the Constitution’s supremacy clause. The supremacy clause establishes federal authority as the “supreme law of the land,” overriding conflicting local or state laws. The DOJ further asserts that such policies are part of a broader trend from Democrat-controlled municipal governments to obstruct and undermine federal law enforcement agencies, especially U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). A mask ban means that federal agents can be identified by far-left activists and thus become targets of harassment campaigns for carrying out their duties, such as immigration enforcement. The DOJ has successfully overturned similar bans in other cities, such as Philadelphia. The lawsuit was announced this week following a series of similar actions by the DOJ over the course of the year.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This Court should join the growing number of others that are putting an end to this type of blatant unconstitutional regulation of the Federal Government,” the DOJ declared in its lawsuit.
🎯 IMPACT: The DOJ’s lawsuit underscores the ongoing tension between federal and local government, especially in jurisdictions that oppose federal immigration enforcement. A ruling in favor of the DOJ could further solidify federal authority over local attempts to prevent federal agencies from carrying out their duties. Back in February, the Trump administration was handed a victory over Democrat Governor of California Gavin Newsom after a California law banning federal agents from wearing masks was blocked by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. However, anti-ICE municipal efforts are unlikely to stop with overturning mask bans. Back in January, Philadelphia District Attorney (DA) Larry Krasner (D), who described ICE agents as “wannabe Nazis” during a rally, threatened sweeping legal action against the agency. If mask bans fail to prevent ICE from carrying out its responsibilities, then municipal leftist hostility towards the agency is likely to redirected towards other efforts.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the city of Milwaukee's ban on masked law enforcement, citing federal supremacy and unconstitutional local interference with federal agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

AOC Joins Calls for Mitch McConnell to Disclose Health Status or Step Down.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has called on Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to provide a health update or step down amid growing concerns about the Senator’s ability to fulfill his duties.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has called on Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to resign if he is unable to fulfill his duties due to health issues.
📺 DETAIL: The 84-year-old McConnell was hospitalized back in June after he was found unconscious at his home. It was later claimed that he had suffered a mild case of pneumonia.” He subsequently issued a statement on July 12 claiming to be recovering, but information regarding his condition has been limited. “As much as it frustrates me, this process takes time. And on the advice of my doctors, I won’t be able to return to the Senate floor to vote quite yet. But rest assured that, in the meantime, I’m not taking a break from the Senate business that matters to you,” wrote the Senator earlier this month. Democrat Governor of Kentucky Andy Beshear had previously written to Sen. McConnell requesting an update, but received no immediate reply. On Thursday, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez called for Sen. McConnell to resign. “I understand that people have a right to medical privacy to deal with their issues, but we do not have the right to disappear from our jobs without explanation,” said the Representative. “If he can’t give us an update, he should resign, absolutely… I think it’s been very clear to people across Kentucky that his ‘update’ was not sufficient,” she said earlier this week.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “If Senator McConnell is not capable of as basic a task as answering a letter to Governor Beshear, I think that that conveys a very disturbing inability to fulfill his duties.” – Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
🎯 IMPACT: Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s demand for Sen. McConnell’s resignation is likely to garner support. Earlier this week, it was revealed that the New York Representative had topped a Democrat primary poll in New Hampshire. As one of the earliest states in the primary process, it is a vital state for a candidate seeking the Presidency to secure in order to gain momentum. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez secured 22 percent in the poll, followed closely by former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on 21 percent. McConnell’s resignation would end the Senator’s lengthy congressional career, which started back in 1985.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has called on Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to provide a health update or step down amid growing concerns about the Senator's ability to fulfill his duties.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Nine Alleged Grooming Gang Members in Court After Investigation Spanning England, Scotland, and Wales.

Nine men face serious charges involving the historic sexual abuse of children over an 11-year period in Great Britain, following an extensive police investigation.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nine men appeared in court in the United Kingdom on Friday, charged with 41 historical child sex offenses spanning an 11-year period.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Anyone who reports child abuse will be taken seriously… We will listen, investigate all offenses and make sure you can access the help and support you need.” – Detective Chief Superintendent Andrew Tuck, Gwent Police
📺 DETAIL: Nine men, aged between 54 and 76 years old, were charged last week. The men charged were Shafaq Mohammed, Syed Mohammad Ashan Taqvi, Mohammed Sheikh Abdul Hannan, Kevin Lawrence, Sheikh Mohammed Tahir Ullah, Aminur Rahman Chowdhury, Shakeel Babur, Murad Ali, and Mohammed Ramzan. The men were arrested this month following an investigation across Birmingham, Lancashire, and London, in England; Argyll and Bute in Scotland; and Newport and Swansea in Wales. They appeared at Newport Magistrates’ Court on Friday. Due to the severity of the cases, the men will appear at Cardiff Crown Court in Wales on August 21. Described by the police as a “complex and long-running investigation into group-based child sexual exploitation in south Wales,” Operation Oak was launched after multiple women reported being sexually abused over the span of 11 years between 1985 and 1996. The eight victims were children at the time, and the abuse took place in Wales. The men were charged with the rape of a female under 16, the rape of a female aged 16 years or over, indecent assault, aiding and abetting the rape of a female under 16, aiding and abetting the rape of a female aged 16 or over, conspiring to rape a girl under the age of 16, conspiring to rape a woman aged 16 years or over, causing the prostitution of a woman, and causing the prostitution of a girl under 16. Despite the seriousness of the offenses, the defendants were granted bail.
🎯 IMPACT: This represents the first court appearance of the nine men since they were charged last week. “We have decided to prosecute eight men with rape and child sexual abuse charges for alleged offending… following a Gwent Police investigation into organised grooming gang activity in South Wales,” said Chief Crown Prosecutor Jenny Hopkins at the time. The case represents another episode in the broader grooming gang scandal in the United Kingdom.

Image by Nika Poznyak.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Nine men face serious charges involving the historic sexual abuse of children over an 11-year period in Great Britain, following an extensive police investigation.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump DOJ Commits to Investigating EVERY Voting Violation After THOUSANDS of Noncitizens Found on NJ Voter Rolls.

The Department of Justice has announced an even stricter enforcement strategy on illegal voting, after thousands of noncitizens were registered to vote in New Jersey.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The top Civil Rights official at the Department of Justice (DOJ), Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, has said the Trump administration will pursue every provable case of illegal voting under a “broken windows” enforcement strategy, marking a shift from prior administrations that focused primarily on widespread fraud deemed capable of affecting election outcomes. Dhillon said the department will investigate every credible lead and prosecute cases supported by evidence, following reports that hundreds of noncitizens voted in New Jersey after thousands were registered through the state’s motor-voter system.
📺 DETAIL: Dhillon said activists and local officials have provided leads and emphasized prosecutors will bring charges when the evidence is conclusive. Dhillon also said noncitizens found to have voted illegally will face consequences, including being barred from future naturalization. She suggested similar voter registration issues may exist in other states, including California, arguing that automatic voter registration policies and inadequate verification have created vulnerabilities. Democrat California Governor Gavin Newsom‘s office responded by claiming that the governor does not administer elections. Dhillon urged states to share electronic voter registration data with federal officials, saying some Democrat-led states have resisted such requests and are facing legal action as a result. She also confirmed the DOJ has deployed federal election monitors to jurisdictions in Arizona and plans to continue monitoring elections nationwide.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We need to go after every single one of these violations … and we are carefully running down each of these leads.” – Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General
🎯 IMPACT: The DOJ’s intensified scrutiny of voter rolls and enforcement of election laws could lead to significant reforms in how states manage voter registration systems. However, resistance from Democrat-led states to federal oversight may frustrate efforts to address vulnerabilities in election integrity and prevent illegal voting, which tends to favor the Democratic Party.
📺 FLASHBACK: The “broken windows” strategy, popularized in the 1990s by New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, focused on addressing minor offenses to prevent them from escalating into more serious crimes, a philosophy now being applied to voter fraud enforcement by the DOJ.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice has announced an even stricter enforcement strategy on illegal voting, after thousands of noncitizens were registered to vote in New Jersey.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Vows EU Will ‘Pay a Very Big Price’ for Latest ‘Illegal’ Fine on U.S. Tech Firms.

President Trump has initiated a Section 301 investigation and threatened tariffs in response to the EU’s hefty fines on U.S. tech giants, marking a significant shift in trade relations.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has announced a Section 301 investigation into the European Union’s practices following a $1 billion fine imposed on Google, part of a broader pattern of the bloc imposing financial penalties on U.S. tech companies.
📰 DETAIL: The EU’s latest fine on Google is part of its Digital Markets Act enforcement, which has seen over $18 billion in penalties against U.S. tech firms. Trump argued in a Truth Social post on Friday that these fines are discriminatory, with the EU ramping them up under the Biden government. He warned that the U.S. will now take a stand to protect its companies, with tariffs to be imposed imminently.
💬 KEY QUOTE:The European Union is at it again and, as usual, taking direct aim at GREAT American Companies! After having fined Apple, for no reason at all, 15 Billion Dollars, Meta, 3 Billion Dollars, Amazon 2.5 Billion Dollars, and many others, we have just been informed that Google, a truly advanced and amazing group, has been fined yet another 1 Billion Dollars… The United States of America is not a “PIGGYBANK” for Europe, nor will we allow it to be! Please let this TRUTH serve to represent that we will immediately initiate a 301 Investigation into the practice of “ROBBING” American Companies and, in turn, the American Taxpayer. The European Union will pay a very big price for this illegal and highly unethical conduct, which I have consistently warned them about. The penalties will be entirely reversed and, we anticipate, a substantial TARIFF to be placed on them at the earliest possible moment. Stay tuned!” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: Trump could impose significant additional tariffs on European goods at a time when the bloc is already suffering an energy and economic crisis due to a combination of the Ukraine war, the Iran war, and its net zero green agenda. potentially forcing the EU to reconsider its approach to U.S. tech firms.
📺 FLASHBACK: Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, argued in May that the Trump administration should expand the use of 301 Investigation powers against foreign states undermining American businesses, including the European Union and Brazil

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has initiated a Section 301 investigation and threatened tariffs in response to the EU's hefty fines on U.S. tech giants, marking a significant shift in trade relations.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Treasury Cracks Down on Terror-Financing Network Linked to Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas.

The Treasury Department has imposed sanctions on a network of Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas operatives, exposing how front organizations and underground banks fund violent extremism.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced new sanctions Thursday targeting individuals and organizations it said were involved in financing Hamas through charities, businesses, and underground financial networks. The sanctions, issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, target a Britain-based Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood official, three alleged financial operatives, and three organizations accused of supporting Hamas’s military wing.
📺 DETAIL: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Trump administration would continue pursuing those who finance terrorist groups, regardless of whether they operate under the guise of charitable or commercial activities. According to the department, Mahmoud al-Abyari, Secretary General of the Muslim Brotherhood General Secretariat, helped manage relationships with Hamas and raise funds for previously sanctioned organizations. Treasury also accused Indonesia-based Tujah Bulah Global, also known as Seven Spikes Global, Gaza-based Madad Palestine Charitable Society, and Turkey-based El-Kahira for General Trading of directing money to Hamas, while alleging El-Kahira also provided underground financial services to criminal organizations, including Sweden’s Foxtrot Network. The action is the latest in a series of Treasury sanctions aimed at disrupting Hamas’s financial operations.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Trump administration will relentlessly pursue terrorists and those who finance them,” said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. “Those who enable Hamas will be exposed, sanctioned, and held accountable.”
🎯 IMPACT: This action highlights the U.S. government’s ongoing efforts to dismantle global financial networks that support terrorism. It underscores the international scope of these operations and the Treasury’s commitment to disrupting them.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this year, the Treasury Department targeted similar networks, including Turkey-based Ghazi Destek Dernegi and several Gaza-based front groups posing as medical clinics, which were found to be directly integrated into Hamas operations.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Treasury Department has imposed sanctions on a network of Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas operatives, exposing how front organizations and underground banks fund violent extremism.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

China, Russia Accused of Driving Anti-Data Center Activism.

Republican lawmakers are urging the Department of Justice to investigate potential foreign interference in campaigns opposing U.S. data center projects, citing concerns over Chinese and Russian influence in AI development.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Republican lawmakers are urging Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to investigate whether foreign-linked organizations are influencing nationwide campaigns to block the construction of artificial intelligence data centers in the United States. In a letter led by Representative Lance Gooden of Texas, lawmakers alleged that groups tied to China and Russia are using nonprofits and advocacy networks to hinder U.S. AI development, arguing these efforts could benefit foreign competitors.
📺 DETAIL: Gooden said hostile foreign actors have historically funded organizations that do not disclose donors and then use those resources to influence American policy. The request comes amid growing opposition to new data centers, notionally over concerns about energy use, environmental impacts, and infrastructure demands, while supporters argue the facilities are essential for expanding AI computing capacity. Lawmakers highlighted testimony from Party for Socialism and Liberation organizer Jack Tensley, who raised security concerns about a proposed data center project in Maryland, as well as social media posts from the organization criticizing the concentration of AI infrastructure in the hands of major technology companies. The letter also cited reports from the Bitcoin Policy Institute and OpenAI alleging foreign-linked efforts to shape public debate over AI and data center development. OpenAI said it banned ChatGPT accounts believed to have originated in China after they were used in apparent covert influence operations targeting American AI policy discussions. The Bitcoin Policy Institute reported that the Party for Socialism and Liberation has organized anti-data center campaigns in at least 14 states and alleged the group is connected to a network funded by Shanghai-based businessman Neville Roy Singham, who is reportedly under federal grand jury investigation.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We believe that the Chinese and also the Russians are colluding and working to make sure that the United States of America is not the leader when it comes to AI policy and development.” – Rep. Lance Gooden
🎯 IMPACT: If confirmed, these allegations would confirm a broad strategy by America’s adversaries to weaken U.S. technological leadership, particularly in the AI sector.
📺 FLASHBACK: Neville Roy Singham, a tech tycoon now residing in China, has been linked to funding pro-Chinese Communist Party organizations in the U.S. and is currently under investigation for his financial activities. His network has reportedly funneled millions into nonprofits opposing U.S. AI advancements.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Republican lawmakers are urging the Department of Justice to investigate potential foreign interference in campaigns opposing U.S. data center projects, citing concerns over Chinese and Russian influence in AI development.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Thousands of Voters Required to Confirm Citizenship Before Midterms in This State:

Alaska’s Division of Elections has flagged an unusually high number of voters who have not verified their American citizenship, raising questions about voter roll accuracy and anti-fraud oversight ahead of the state’s primary elections.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Over 3,000 letters have been sent to registered voters in Alaska asking them to verify their American citizenship.
📺 DETAIL: Alaska’s Division of Elections is asking registered voters in the state to confirm their U.S. citizenship. The request comes ahead of the state’s primary elections on August 18. The number of voters flagged to verify their citizenship, a standard procedure as part of voter roll maintenance, is typically around 200, according to state officials. While the high figure may be the result of outdated information, the Trump administration’s crackdown on voter fraud means the unusually high number of flagged voters will be treated with increased scrutiny. Those flagged are temporarily moved to inactive status but can still vote provisionally by affirming their citizenship under oath. Voters who respond to the letters will have their active status restored.
🎯 IMPACT: The incident highlights potential vulnerabilities in the state’s voter roll. Notably, it follows the decision of Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) to oppose two Republican-backed election integrity measures in February. Incidents such as these are likely to be treated with greater scrutiny as focus on non-citizens voting in U.S. elections continues to grow, partially due to the Trump administration’s focus on combating election fraud. This potentially adds to a number of stories regarding non-citizens voting in U.S. elections that have been reported over the past few months alone. Back in May, a former mayor of Coldwater, Kansas, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for voting illegally as a Green Card holder and holding political office unlawfully. That same month, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued charges against four immigrants in New Jersey for allegedly voting illegally. In April, a non-citizen was charged after allegedly voting in Minnesota in 2024. If potential voter fraud is left unaddressed, data suggests that Democrats gain an undue advantage, as only five percent of non-citizen voters are Republican.

Image by Gillfoto.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Alaska's Division of Elections has flagged an unusually high number of voters who have not verified their American citizenship, raising questions about voter roll accuracy and anti-fraud oversight ahead of the state's primary elections.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: U.S. Coal Reserves Could Power the Country for 600 Years.

A new federal report has highlighted the massive coal reserves beneath federally managed lands in the United States, emphasizing the potential for centuries of industrial production and energy security.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The United States has enough coal for the next 600 years, according to a new geological survey.
📺 DETAIL: According to the country’s Geological Survey, the United States has enough coal to provide energy for the next 600 years. This includes 4.2 billion short tons linked to active mines and an additional 356 billion short tons beneath federally managed public land. The Department of Interior’s estimate, which was published on Thursday, assumes that all coal reserves are used. Wyoming dominates the nation when it comes to coal production, with 87 percent of the coal reserves associated with active federal mines located in the state. The state also hosts 14 out of the 34 miles of federal coal land in the United States. “Thanks to the USGS’s rigorous and independent assessment, we’re better equipped to manage America’s vast public lands responsibly while supporting energy security and economic opportunity,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum.
💬 KEY QUOTE:American Energy Dominance is more important than ever, and so is beautiful clean coal’s role in the production of electricity needed to fuel our future prosperity,” Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum.
🎯 IMPACT: Last year, the Trump administration opened up 13.1 million acres of public land for coal mining and announced a $625 million investment in coal-fired power plants. “It matters to the world, and it’s going to continue to matter for a long time,” said Secretary Burgum at the time. The publication of the survey’s findings adds to the Trump administration’s enduring focus on protecting the coal industry from decline in order to secure American energy independence. The report highlights the potential for coal to remain a significant part of the country’s long-term energy mix, despite growing emphasis on renewable energy sources. It also suggests a change in the federal government’s attitude towards coal. In April 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed a batch of executive orders reversing anti-coal policies implemented during the Biden government.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new federal report has highlighted the massive coal reserves beneath federally managed lands in the United States, emphasizing the potential for centuries of industrial production and energy security.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Suspect in Central Park Double Stabbing Shouted ‘Allahu Akbar!’

A suspect has been arrested following a double stabbing near Manhattan’s Central Park, with victims reporting the assailant shouted “Allahu akbar!” during the attacks.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Two men, one Asian and one Jewish, were stabbed near Central Park in Manhattan, New York City, on Thursday, in a possible anti-Semitic attack. The suspect, Raul Morales, 51, allegedly shouted “Allahu akbar!”—an Arabic phrase meaning “[Our] God is greater!”—during the attacks, according to victim and witness statements.
👤 WHO WAS INVOLVED: The victims, an Asian man and a Jewish man, are in stable condition. Raul Morales was arrested in connection with the stabbings on Thursday, and police are investigating his motives, including possible mental health issues.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Detectives are continuing to work the case and determine motive, but according to victim and witness statements, Morales yelled ‘Allahu Akbar’ during both attacks. While the perpetrator has no known mental health history with the NYPD, the initial investigation suggests that mental health may have been a factor. At this time there is no known link between Morales and either of the victims, nor between the victims and each other.” – New York City Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch in a Friday morning statement
🎯 IMPACT: The attacks raise concerns about public safety and the potential for ideologically, religiously, and mental health driven violence in American cities. Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a Ugandan Muslim immigrant, echoes Tisch in suggesting that “mental health may have been a factor” in the attacks, although he acknowledged that the NYPD is “also evaluating these stabbings as potential hate crimes.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A suspect has been arrested following a double stabbing near Manhattan's Central Park, with victims reporting the assailant shouted "Allahu akbar!" during the attacks.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.