GET THE APP
Thursday, November 13, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Lawfare

Comey, James Seek to Block Trump’s Prosecutor Overseeing Their Cases.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Attorneys for Letitia James and James Comey are seeking to disqualify U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, alleging her appointment was illegal.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Letitia James, James Comey, U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, Judge Cameron Currie, and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The hearing is scheduled for Thursday in federal court, presided over by Judge Cameron Currie in South Carolina.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The law allows the attorney general only one appointment of up to 120 days, after which the post must be filled by other means.” – Attorneys for James and Comey

🎯IMPACT: If Halligan is disqualified, it could jeopardize the indictments against James and Comey, as she was the only prosecutor to sign and present the cases to grand juries.

IN FULL

Attorneys for New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey will appear in federal court on Thursday in an attempt to have interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan disqualified from prosecuting their cases. The hearing will be overseen by Judge Cameron Currie, a Clinton appointee, in South Carolina, with the legal teams for James and Comey expected to move that Halligan’s appointment is illegal under federal law.

Halligan, one of President Donald J. Trump’s former personal lawyers, was named by Attorney General Pam Bondi as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia in September. Halligan replaced Erik Siebert, who resigned after reportedly refusing to bring charges against Comey and James.

James and Comey’s legal teams claim Halligan’s appointment violated legal limits on who can serve as an interim U.S. attorney. They argue that the federal statute allows for only one 120-day appointment by the attorney general, after which the position must be filled by court-directed means. The Department of Justice (DOJ), however, contends that Siebert’s resignation reset the 120-day clock, permitting Bondi to appoint Halligan temporarily.

The issue is significant because Halligan was the sole federal prosecutor to sign the indictments and present evidence to grand juries in the cases against James and Comey. If disqualified, it could impact the validity of the indictments. Three other DOJ prosecutors have already been disqualified by federal courts in related matters.

Image by Paul Morigi Photography.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 minute ago
Corruption
News

NEW: Biden’s Bastard, Jack Smith, Tried to Spy on Speaker of the House in Arctic Frost Probe.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former Special Counsel Jack Smith sought the personal cellphone records of then-Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and former Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) during his January 6 witch hunt.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jack Smith, Kevin McCarthy, Louie Gohmert, Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and others.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation targeted phone records from January 4 to 7, 2021.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Jack Smith’s radical and deranged investigation was never about finding the truth. It was a blatant weaponizing of the Justice Department to attack political opponents of the Biden administration.” – Kevin McCarthy

🎯IMPACT: Smith’s investigation cost taxpayers over $50 million and has raised concerns about government overreach and privacy violations.

IN FULL

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith reportedly requested the personal cellphone records of then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and then-Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) during his probe into the January 6, 2021, Capitol protests. On May 25, 2023, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Investigative Division prepared a “Significant Case Notification” outlining Smith’s subpoena for toll records from AT&T and Verizon.

McCarthy sharply criticized the effort, labeling it a “blatant weaponizing of the Justice Department.” He further stated, “Perhaps no action underscores this point more than the illegal attempt to access the phone records of sitting members of the House and Senate—including the Speaker of the House.”

The Biden-Harris FBI launched the probe, code-named “Arctic Frost,” in April 2022, aiming to obtain phone records from Republican lawmakers such as Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Ron Johnson (R-WI), and Josh Hawley (R-MO), among others. AT&T revealed that Smith’s team had subpoenaed records for two congressional members, including McCarthy, though the company ultimately provided none following legal challenges.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson are spearheading an inquiry into the issue, with Grassley calling it a “fishing expedition that swept up Republicans in and out of Congress, from top to bottom.”

These disclosures have fueled intensified concerns over government overreach and weaponization under the Democrats, and breaches of elected lawmakers’ privacy. Arctic Frost, which has been likened to Watergate and has cost taxpayers more than $50 million, is currently under ongoing congressional review. It was authorized by Biden’s Attorney General, Merrick Garland, and former FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

21 minutes ago
Politics

Stefanik Neck and Neck With Hochul in NY Governor Race.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A poll shows Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) trailing New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) by only three percentage points in a hypothetical gubernatorial match-up.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. Elise Stefanik, Gov. Kathy Hochul, and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman (R).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The poll was conducted November 9-10 among 500 likely New York voters.

🎯IMPACT: The poll suggests Hochul is vulnerable to a 2026 challenge by Stefanik and indicates increasingly competitive election dynamics in New York.

IN FULL

A new poll conducted by J.L. Partners shows Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) trailing incumbent Governor Kathy Hochul (D) by just three points in a hypothetical gubernatorial match-up. The survey of 500 likely New York voters found Hochul leading Stefanik 46 percent to 43 percent, with 11 percent undecided.

Stefanik, who recently announced her gubernatorial campaign, has positioned herself as a strong supporter of President Donald J. Trump. She was first elected to Congress in 2014 to represent New York’s 21st Congressional District and served as the House GOP Conference Chair from 2021 to 2025. Trump had nominated her for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations in January, but the nomination was later withdrawn to ensure her vote remained in Congress for key legislative priorities.

The poll also revealed that Stefanik enjoys a commanding lead over Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman (R) in a potential GOP primary, with 74 percent support compared to Blakeman’s five percent. Blakeman, 70, is believed to be preparing to announce his candidacy for governor soon.

Gov. Hochul’s job performance received mixed reviews in the poll, with 40 percent of respondents strongly or somewhat approving and 54 percent strongly or somewhat disapproving. Meanwhile, 37 percent of voters view Stefanik very or somewhat favorably, while 32 percent hold unfavorable views of her.

The survey, conducted November 9-10, has a margin of error of 4.4 percent.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

51 minutes ago
Politics

D.C.’s Democrat City Council Moves to Block Trump’s No Tax on Tips, Overtime Policy.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Washington D.C. Council passed an emergency tax bill to decouple parts of its tax code from federal tax changes, blocking tax breaks for tips and overtime pay.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The D.C. Council and workers affected by the changes.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The emergency measure applies for 90 days in Washington, D.C., with a planned temporary extension of 225 days.

💬KEY QUOTE: “At our most recent Legislative Meeting, the Council voted on an emergency basis to decouple elements of the District’s tax code from the federal,” said the D.C. Council in an official statement.

🎯IMPACT: Thousands of hospitality workers in D.C. will see tips and overtime pay remain fully taxable under local law.

IN FULL

Washington, D.C.’s Democrat-dominated City Council has adopted emergency tax legislation aimed at blocking federal tax code changes made under President Donald J. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The move will prevent tax breaks for tip wages and overtime pay from taking effect in the city.

It is estimated that thousands of restaurant and hospitality industry workers in the nation’s capital will be impacted by the D.C. Council’s new tax law. Provisions in the OBBB allow workers to deduct up to $25,000 in tips and $12,500 in overtime pay for single filers, with higher amounts for joint filers. However, these deductions will not be reflected in local tax returns due to the Council’s decision.

Additionally, the D.C. Council ended the $6,000 local senior bonus deduction and other business-related tax breaks in an effort to improve the city’s finances. Concerningly, estimates suggest the District of Columbia could face a revenue shortfall well over $1 billion over the next three years. The budget gap is primarily being driven by the Trump administration’s reductions in the federal workforce and increasing costs for the city’s social programs.

“At our most recent Legislative Meeting, the Council voted on an emergency basis to decouple elements of the District’s tax code from the federal, following Congress’ passage of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). In doing so, and in light of revised revenue estimates by the District’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the Council also voted to dedicate a portion of the newfound revenue to two purposes: an accelerated full local match for the federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the establishment of a local child tax credit of $1,000 per child for eligible families,” the D.C. Council said in a statement.

The emergency amendment applies for 90 days, with a planned temporary extension of 225 days. A permanent measure will require further Council votes.

Image by APK.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
News

It’s 2025 and DC Democrat Party Operatives Are Still ‘Working from Home.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Democratic National Committee (DNC) announced a full-time return to office for its workers, sparking discontent among the staff and its union.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: DNC Chairman Ken Martin, DNC staff, and the union representing them, Local 500 of the Service Employees International Union.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made at an all-staff meeting on Wednesday, with the return to the Washington, D.C. office set for February.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If DNC staff members did not like his return-to-work policies, they should consider finding another job elsewhere.” – Ken Martin

🎯IMPACT: The union called the decision “callous” and is considering its options, while some staff members expressed frustration and disagreement.

IN FULL

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has mandated a return to full-time in-person work at its Washington, D.C. headquarters, effective February. Chairman Ken Martin shared this update during a Wednesday all-staff call.

He stressed the importance of everyone being in the office to avoid isolated information bubbles and to handle urgent decisions as the midterm elections approach. The news sparked quick pushback from both those present in person and remote participants on Zoom.

Staff at the DNC, represented by Local 500 of the Service Employees International Union, decried the policy as “callous.” Union leaders voiced dismay over Martin’s brush-off of employee worries.

Addressing the uproar, Martin advised that anyone dissatisfied with the rule should look for jobs elsewhere and likened the shift to removing a “Band-Aid.” Fresh off ratifying a collective bargaining deal over the summer, the union is now considering its next steps.

This move aligns with broader patterns across U.S. corporations and federal agencies, where remote setups are increasingly being phased out.

Image ajay_suresh.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Crime
Immigration
UK

Migrant Men Face Charges in Fresh Rape Gang Scandal.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Seven men were charged with over 40 offences, including sexual exploitation and drug-related crimes, against 11 teenage victims in Bristol.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Alleged predators Mohamed Arafe, Sina Omari, Wadie Sharaf, Hussain Bashar, Mohammed Kurdi, and a 19-year-old man and a 26-year-old man, unnamed in most sources but identified as Sardam Ahmed and Ihab Al-Eisawi by journalist Charlie Peters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The offences occurred between 2022 and 2025 in Bristol. The suspects were re-arrested on November 11 and will appear in Bristol Magistrates’ Court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This remains a complex and sensitive investigation which has the protection of young girls from exploitation and the disruption of offending at its very heart,” said Detective Chief Inspector Tom Herbert.

🎯IMPACT: The arrests highlight Britain’s ongoing issues with grooming gangs, not only with South Asian heritage Muslims but now recently arrived migrants from the Middle East.

IN FULL

Seven men in England have been charged with more than 40 offences, including rape, sexual exploitation, and drug-related crimes, involving 11 teenage victims in Bristol. The alleged crimes took place between 2022 and 2025. All suspects were re-arrested during a targeted police operation on November 11 and are due to appear before Bristol Magistrates’ Court.

Those charged include Mohamed Arafe, a Syrian Arab, Sina Omari, an Iranian Arab, Wadie Sharaf, a Syrian Arab, Hussain Bashar, a British citizen whose ethnicity is not officially confirmed, and Mohammed Kurdi, a British citizen of Arab ethnicity. Two additional suspects, a 19-year-old man and a 26-year-old man, go unnamed in several reports, but journalist Charlie Peters has identified them as Sardam Ahmed, from Iraq, and Ihab Al-Eisawi, from Egypt. Peters reports that Ahmed and Al-Eisawi arrived in Britain illegally on small boats, while Arafe was imported by the government in 2019 under a Syrian refugee resettlement scheme.

Detective Chief Inspector Tom Herbert, who is leading the investigation, said: “This remains a complex and sensitive investigation which has the protection of young girls from exploitation and the disruption of offending at its very heart. Working with our partners, we’ve ensured the most appropriate safeguarding measures and support has been made available to each victim to protect them from harm.”

Bristol Superintendent Deepak Kenth added: “We know this update will be a huge shock to our communities and I want to reassure everyone that we’ll continue to work tirelessly to protect children from abuse and exploitation.”

According to police, Arafe faces five counts of arranging or facilitating the sexual exploitation of a child, as well as drug supply charges. Omari has been charged with multiple counts of rape and sexual exploitation. Sharaf, Bashar, and Kurdi face similar allegations, with specific details outlined by investigators.

The case comes amid renewed national scrutiny of group-based child sexual exploitation in the United Kingdom, following a series of high-profile reviews and reopened investigations forced by pressure from figures including Reform Party leader Nigel Farage and X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk.

Earlier this year, a government-commissioned audit found that police forces had failed to identify a disproportionate number of South Asian and Pakistani-heritage Muslim men suspected of involvement in grooming gangs that targeted white girls. Notably, the audit found that ethnicity data had been omitted in the majority of relevant cases, obfuscating the scale of the predation.

The British Home Office, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, has directed police across England and Wales to begin recording ethnicity and nationality data in all child sexual abuse investigations—although similar instructions have been ignored before.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) is currently overseeing a review of thousands of historic grooming gang files across the country, after internal audits revealed that some cases may have been prematurely closed. However, survivors have criticized the government’s handling of a planned national inquiry into grooming gangs, with several members of a victims’ liaison panel resigning and calling for the resignation of the government’s safeguarding minister.

Image by Metro Centric.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

15 hours ago
William Upton
Breaking

BREAKING: The Democrat Government Shutdown is Finally Over.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Democrat-caused government shutdown has ended after the House of Representatives passed a temporary funding bill.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: House Republicans, House Democrats, Senate Republicans, Senate Democrats, President Donald J. Trump, federal government agencies, and air traffic controllers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The shutdown ended late Wednesday, November 12, 2025.

🎯IMPACT: The funding deal keeps the government open through January 30, 2026; covers the annual appropriations of the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), military construction, and the legislative branch; includes measures reversing federal layoffs implemented during the shutdown and guarantees Senate Democrats a vote on extending enhanced Obamacare subsidies.

IN FULL

A bill providing temporary funding for the federal government is headed to President Donald J. Trump‘s desk after being adopted by the House of Representatives along a party-line vote. The legislation, pushed by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), passed the Senate late Monday and will provide government funding through January 30. Additionally, the measure includes annual appropriations covering the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction, and the legislative branch.

The deal also includes measures reversing federal layoffs implemented during the shutdown and guarantees Senate Democrats a vote on extending enhanced Obamacare subsidies. However, the House has not definitively stated that it will take up the Obamacare subsidies, frustrating far-left lawmakers such as Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), both of whom pushed their colleagues to vote against the funding measure.

Importantly, the adoption of the bill ends the 43-day government shutdown that began on October 1 when Senate Democrats began a filibuster against a House-passed funding bill, effectively defeating the measure. The Senate held 15 failed votes on the funding package before finally adopting the new compromise on the 16th vote.

While the initial weeks of the Democratic shutdown saw little disruption for most Americans, as the funding lapse dragged on—eventually becoming the longest in history—a number of federal operations encountered significant issues. Most noticeable was travel chaos as air traffic controllers went without pay. Last Friday, over 1,000 flights were cancelled and nearly 10,000 were delayed as many of the nation’s largest airports saw dangerous shortages of air traffic controllers.

Image by Victoria Pickering.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

15 hours ago
Corruption
News

$100 Million Ukraine Corruption Scandal: Zelensky Ally Flees to Israel Amid Police Raids.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Ukrainian security forces raided the apartment of businessman Timur Mindich, a close associate of President Volodymyr Zelensky, as part of a $100 million corruption investigation. Mindich fled the country hours before the raid. Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko has also been targeted, and is now suspended as the investigation unfolds.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Timur Mindich, President Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), and Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Investigations began in 2024; raids and searches were conducted recently in Ukraine, with Mindich reportedly fleeing to Israel.

💬KEY QUOTE: “All effective measures against corruption are crucial. The certainty of punishment is essential.” – President Volodymyr Zelensky

🎯IMPACT: The raids highlight Ukraine’s ongoing corruption issues, increasing pressure on Zelensky’s administration as public dissatisfaction grows.

IN FULL

Ukrainian law enforcement officers have raided the apartment of businessman Timur Mindich, a close associate of President Volodymyr Zelensky, as part of a $100 million corruption investigation conducted by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU). Mindich fled the country just hours before the raid, reportedly traveling to Israel, raising suspicions that he may have been tipped off.

According to NABU, the investigation, code-named “Midas”, was the result of a 15-month operation involving more than 1,000 hours of wiretapping and 70 raids across Ukraine. Investigators allege that a criminal group created a large-scale corruption network within Energoatom, the state-owned nuclear energy producer. The group is accused of forcing suppliers to pay kickbacks of 10 to 15 percent of contract values to ensure prompt payments and retain their supplier status.

“Particular attention was paid to cryptocurrencies. Most operations, including cash withdrawals, took place outside Ukraine. For example, during foreign delegations of representatives of state bodies and the management of state-owned energy sector enterprises,” NABU stated.

NABU confirmed that Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko was also among those targeted by searches, and he has since been suspended pending further investigation.

Mindich, once a business partner and long-time friend of Zelensky, co-owned the entertainment company Kvartal 95 with him. Zelensky divested his shares after taking office in 2019. Mindich has also been linked to Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, another Zelensky associate and prominent sponsor, and reportedly provided Zelensky with an armored car during his election campaign These connections have amplified political scrutiny of the president.

“All effective measures against corruption are crucial. The certainty of punishment is essential,” Zelensky said in response to the raids.

The case has intensified public frustration over corruption in Ukraine. A recent survey found that 77.6 percent of Ukrainians hold Zelensky personally responsible for persistent graft. The raid follows a summer of turmoil in Kiev after the government’s controversial attempt to curb the independence of key anti-corruption institutions.

In July, protests erupted nationwide after parliament moved to place NABU and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) under the Zelensky-appointed Prosecutor General’s oversight, a step critics said would neuter the agencies’ autonomy. Following several days of mass demonstrations and international condemnation, lawmakers reversed the decision.

The political fallout has drawn international attention. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán opposes Ukraine’s bid for European Union (EU) membership due to widespread corruption and democratic backsliding.

Russian officials have sought to publicize the crisis, describing the raids and protests as signs of “panic” within Zelensky’s administration.

Image via Presidency of Ukraine.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

16 hours ago
Health

FDA Issues Recall for ADHD Medication.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries issued a voluntary recall of several lots of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate capsules due to a quality control defect.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and millions of Americans on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The recall affects capsules with expiration dates ranging from February 2026 to May 2026, manufactured by Ohm Laboratories in New Brunswick, New Jersey.

💬KEY QUOTE: The FDA stated the recall was classified as Class II, meaning the defect “may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences.”

🎯IMPACT: Millions of ADHD patients may experience reduced therapeutic effects, potentially worsening symptoms like fatigue or concentration issues.

IN FULL

A major drug recall is underway, potentially impacting millions of Americans who are prescribed isdexamfetamine dimesylate capsules—a generic attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries initiated the voluntary recall.

Notably, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified the recall as Class II, indicating the defect “may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences,” though the risk of serious harm is remote. Patients are advised not to stop taking the medication without consulting their healthcare provider and to seek guidance for a safe replacement.

The recall includes 100-count bottles of 10 mg to 70 mg capsules with expiration dates ranging from February 2026 to May 2026. Affected batch numbers include AD42468, AD48705, AD42469, AD48707, AD42470, AD48708, AD48709, AD50894, AD48710, AD50895, AD48711, AD50896, AD48712, and AD50898.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, commonly marketed under brand names like Vyvanse and Arynta, is prescribed to manage ADHD symptoms such as impulsiveness, disorganization, and difficulty focusing. Prescriptions for this medication have risen significantly, accounting for 19 percent of all stimulant prescriptions in 2023, with over nine million prescriptions dispensed that year.

The medication, manufactured by Ohm Laboratories in New Jersey, is a prodrug that becomes active only after being metabolized into dextroamphetamine, offering a smoother, longer-lasting effect.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

16 hours ago
News
Politics

Transurrection: Petition to Oust Schumer from Senate Leadership Hits 50,000 Signatures.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A petition to remove Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has surpassed 50,000 signatures, following criticism of his leadership during recent legislative battles.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Transgender activist Charlotte Clymer (born Charles Clymer), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and several Democrat lawmakers, including Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Seth Moulton (D-MA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The petition was launched in March 2023 and has gained momentum following a recent Senate vote on a continuing resolution to fund the government.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We need new leadership to meet this grave moment, and we need it now.” – Charlotte Clymer

🎯IMPACT: Growing calls for Schumer to step down, with at least 11 Democrat lawmakers, 15 organizations, and eight Democrat candidates supporting his removal.

IN FULL

A petition led by transgender activist Charlotte Clymer, formerly Charles Clymer, calling for the removal of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has surpassed 50,000 signatures, reflecting growing frustration with Democratic leadership. Clymer’s petition accuses Schumer of failing to effectively oppose President Donald J. Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, describing the 74-year-old Democrat’s leadership as “impotent” and lacking “a comprehensive plan or strategy to combat the efforts by Trump and Elon Musk to demolish the federal government and harm the American people.” In his statement accompanying the petition, Clymer wrote, “We need new leadership to meet this grave moment, and we need it now.”

The petition, launched in March after Schumer voted to advance a Republican continuing resolution (CR) funding bill, has regained momentum following a recent Senate vote on a similar funding measure. Though Schumer opposed the latest resolution, enough Senate Democrats joined Republicans to pass it, prompting backlash. The progressive group Indivisible has urged candidates to reject Schumer’s leadership and “abandon the status quo of feckless leadership.”

So far, 11 Democratic lawmakers, 15 organizations, and eight Democratic candidates have joined calls for Schumer to step aside. The protests organized under the “No Kings” movement have amplified these demands, framing them as part of a broader push for generational and ideological change in Senate leadership. Despite the mounting criticism, Schumer has insisted, “Look, I’m not stepping down.”

The growing rift over Schumer’s leadership mirrors wider divisions inside the Democratic Party. Earlier this year, anti-gun rights activist David Hogg attempted to launch a multi-million-dollar campaign aimed at challenging incumbent Democrats in safe districts who were not deemed woke enough.

Veteran strategist James Carville blasted Hogg’s effort, calling him a “contemptible little twerp” for targeting members of his own party. The controversy deepened when the Democratic National Committee (DNC) later voided Hogg’s appointment as vice chair, citing gender-parity rules that required him to be a woman.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

17 hours ago
Crime
News

Far-Left UK Govt Halts Intel Sharing with US Over Trump’s Anti-Cartel Strikes.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The British government has ceased sharing intelligence with the U.S. regarding drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean, citing concerns over the legality of American military strikes against them.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: British and American governments, Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, other cartels, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Britain, concerning operations in international waters in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There were massive amounts of drugs coming into our country to kill a lot of people, and everybody fully understands that.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The decision to halt intelligence sharing highlights tensions between allies over military actions targeting drug traffickers.

IN FULL

The British government under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has suspended intelligence sharing with the United States over operations targeting drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, claiming concerns about the legality of a series of lethal American strikes in international waters. The decision comes after a September operation that killed 11 people and targeted alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, followed by many more.

For years, the United Kingdom has provided intelligence to support U.S. efforts to track and intercept narcotics shipments across the Caribbean. However, officials in London have reportedly questioned whether recent strikes comply with international law. At least 76 people are believed to have died in these U.S. operations since early 2025.

President Donald J. Trump, who has defended the campaign, said of the narco-terrorists killed in the strikes, “Obviously, they won’t do it again. There were massive amounts of drugs coming into our country to kill a lot of people, and everybody fully understands that.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio has echoed that sentiment, saying in September, “Blow them up, get rid of them.”

Globalist United Nations (UN) High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has condemned the strikes as “extrajudicial killing.” The U.S. government, which notably has not signed the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, maintains that its actions are lawful under its designation of Tren de Aragua as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad