❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge declined to temporarily halt the construction of President Donald J. Trump’s White House ballroom following a lawsuit from the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, the Trump administration, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was announced on Tuesday; construction plans involve the former White House East Wing in Washington, D.C.
🎯IMPACT: The Trump administration must submit construction plans to federal review panels by the end of December, while the preservation group continues its legal challenge.
A federal judge has declined a request to temporarily halt construction of a White House ballroom initiated by President Donald J. Trump. The lawsuit, brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, sought an emergency restraining order to stop the project.
The ruling, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon—a George W. Bush appointee—found that the National Trust for Historic Preservation failed to demonstrate that “great and certain” harm would occur if construction proceeded. He noted that the anticipated below-ground work is not set to begin until January, with above-ground work scheduled for April. However, Judge Leon cautioned that President Trump should be prepared to reverse any below-ground construction if it results in alterations to the existing above-ground structure.
While construction on the ballroom is cleared to continue for now, Judge Leon indicated that he intends to hear arguments early next year on whether to issue a longer-term preliminary injunction halting the project. Additionally, he stressed that the Trump administration is to abide by its commitment to submit construction plans to the National Capital Planning Commission before the end of the year.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed its lawsuit on Friday, arguing that the administration bypassed legal requirements for consultation with the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts. The group contends these consultations are typically required before making significant changes to federal property.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.