Monday, January 12, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Former Senior Cabinet Member Backs Farage for Prime Minister.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Former Conservative (Tory) Party chairman and Chancellor of the Exchequer Nadhim Zahawi announced his support for Reform Party leader Nigel Farage as a future prime minister.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nadhim Zahawi, Nigel Farage, and Tory former prime ministers Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 12, at a press conference in London.

💬KEY QUOTE: Zahawi said Britain “really does need Nigel Farage as Prime Minister.”

🎯IMPACT: Zahawi’s endorsement of Farage could shift party political dynamics ahead of the 2024 general election.

IN FULL

Former British Conservative (Tory) Party chairman and Chancellor of the Exchequer Nadhim Zahawi announced on January 12 that he is endorsing Nigel Farage as Britain’s next leader, saying the country “really does need Nigel Farage as Prime Minister.” Zahawi, who was born in Baghdad in 1967 and left Iraq with his family during the 1970s, spoke about his journey from refugee to senior Cabinet minister during his announcement, saying, “I pinch myself every morning to wake up… This is the greatest country on earth.”

First elected as Member of Parliament (M) for England’s Stratford-upon-Avon constituency (electoral district) in 2010, Zahawi went on to hold a number of senior government roles. He played a central role in overseeing Britain’s controversial COVID-19 vaccine rollout and later served as Chancellor of the Exchequer—roughly equivalent to U.S. Treasury Secretary—under Boris Johnson.

Zahawi’s praise for Farage comes at a time when Reform, the party led by the veteran Brexit campaigner, has been gaining traction, consistently polling ahead of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party and the Conservatives, who governed from 2010 to mid-2024. In recent months, Farage’s party has benefited from a series of high-profile defections, including sitting MPs, former ministers, and dozens of local councillors, particularly in London and southern England.

Polling and internal party surveys have also suggested growing support among Conservative voters for closer cooperation or even a merger with Reform, underscoring the Conservatives’ displacement by Reform on the British right.

Image by IAEA Imagebank.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Texas Is Sending Voter Data to the DOJ for Auditing.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) announced the state sent its voter rolls to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to check for potential ineligible registrations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, and the DOJ.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on Monday; with eligibility reviews to occur across all 254 counties in Texas.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We want our voter rolls to be checked for potential ineligible registrations. Only US citizens can vote in Texas.” – Gov. Abbott

🎯IMPACT: Over 2,700 possible illegal immigrants were flagged as registered voters, prompting a statewide eligibility review.

IN FULL

Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) confirmed on Monday that the state had sent its voter rolls to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to ensure that only eligible voters are registered. Abbott shared the news on X (formerly Twitter), emphasizing that only American citizens are allowed to vote in Texas—and in American federal elections on the whole.

“We want our voter rolls to be checked for potential ineligible registrations. Only U.S. citizens can vote in Texas,” Abbott stated. The move follows an October announcement by Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, who revealed that a cross-check of voter records had identified over 2,700 possible illegal immigrants registered to vote, leading to a review across all 254 counties in the state.

The Trump administration has increasingly pushed states to ensure voter roll compliance, asserting that maintaining accurate records is critical for public trust in election outcomes. However, Democrat-controlled states have largely attempted to resist the effort, claiming spuriously that sharing voter registration data with the DOJ could lead to privacy issues and the risk of eligible voters being improperly purged from the rolls.

Earlier this month, Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin revealed that legal action could be taken against states that comply with the DOJ’s requests. Meanwhile, Texas is among at least seven states that have provided voter information to federal authorities. Meanwhile, late last year, the DOJ launched litigation against six Democrat-led states, including Delaware, Maryland, and Washington, for refusing to share their voter registration rolls, accusing them of violating federal election law.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Seditious’ Senator Mark Kelly Just Filed a Lawsuit Against Pete Hegseth, Here’s Why:

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) is suing the War Department and War Secretary Pete Hegseth over actions to demote him and cut his retirement pay.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sen. Mark Kelly, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Navy, the Department of War, and Navy Secretary John Phelan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in Washington, D.C., with recent actions stemming from a November video released by Kelly and fellow Democrats.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly—and five other members of Congress—released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline.” — Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The Department of War contends that Kelly’s current status as a U.S. senator does not exempt him from accountability.

IN FULL

U.S. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) filed a federal lawsuit on Monday against the Department of War and War Secretary Pete Hegseth over action to demote him and cut his retirement pay after Kelly urged military service members to “refuse illegal orders” in a video with other Democratic lawmakers. Notably, neither Kelly—a retired U.S. Navy officer—nor his colleagues actually defined what would constitute an “illegal order,” spurring allegations that the video was intended to encourage unlawful dissent in the military.

Filed in Washington, D.C., the lawsuit names Sec. Hegseth, the Department of War, the U.S. Navy, and Navy Secretary John Phelan as defendants. Sen. Kelly claims these actions are politically motivated and tied to a feud with the Trump administration.

In November last year, Kelly joined five other Democratic lawmakers, dubbed the “Seditious Six,” in a video telling service members that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders. Following this, Hegseth issued a letter censuring Kelly, stating that his remarks undermined good order and discipline within the military.

“Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly—and five other members of Congress—released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline,” Hegseth said earlier this month, adding: “The Department of War—and the American people—expect justice.” The Department of War clarified that Kelly’s current status as a U.S. senator does not exempt him from accountability. Further violations could lead to additional actions.

Following the formal censure in early January, Kelly was given 30 days to respond, prompting the current lawsuit.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Florida Lt. Gov Jay Collins Enters Wide-Open GOP Primary for Governor.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Florida Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins (R) announced his candidacy for governor on Monday, joining the race to succeed Governor Ron DeSantis (R), who is term-limited.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, Gov. Ron DeSantis, U.S. Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL), former Florida House Republican Speaker Paul Renner, and James Fishback.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announcement made on Monday; the Florida gubernatorial election is in November 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m running for Governor to keep Florida strong and to build on the legacy of leadership that has made our state the model for the nation.” – Jay Collins

🎯IMPACT: Collins enters a competitive GOP primary field, vowing to continue DeSantis’ legacy and back President Donald J. Trump’s America First agenda.

IN FULL

Florida Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins (R) has officially announced his candidacy for governor, entering the race to replace current Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL), who is term-limited. Collins, a former Green Beret, emphasized his leadership experience in his announcement.

“I’m running for Governor because leadership is forged under pressure, not in soundbites. I served over 23 years in the United States military, mainly as a Green Beret, where accountability is real, decisions have consequences, and service comes before self,” Collins said in a statement, adding: “That experience shaped how I lead and why I believe public office is a public trust.”

Collins, who was appointed lieutenant governor by DeSantis in August, referred to his partnership with the current governor in advancing a “bold, conservative agenda.” He stated, “In the Legislature and as Lieutenant Governor, I’ve worked alongside Governor Ron DeSantis to deliver results and advance a bold, conservative agenda. I did not come to chase headlines. I came to deliver results.”

The GOP primary for the gubernatorial race is shaping up to be competitive, with other contenders including Trump-backed U.S. Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL), former Florida House Republican Speaker Paul Renner, and former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) advisor James Fishback. Collins also expressed his intent to be a “strong partner” for President Donald J. Trump, aligning his platform with the America First agenda.

“As Governor, I will be a strong partner to President Trump in fighting for secure borders, a strong economy, and an America First agenda that puts families and freedom first. This moment demands discipline, courage, and leaders willing to do what is right, even when it is hard. I am ready to lead. I am ready to Keep Florida Strong!” Collins declared.

When his appointment as Lieutenant Governor was announced, Collins faced backlash over allegations that a nonprofit group he had worked with since 2018 had mandated diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and requirements for employees and contractors, with Governor DeSantis defending him against accusations that he is “woke.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Is Meeting the Venezuelan Opposition Leader This Week.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, is set to meet with President Donald J. Trump at the White House on Thursday.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, María Corina Machado, and Venezuelans.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at the White House, following the U.S. military operation to remove Marxist narco-dictator Nicolás Maduro from power.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I certainly would love to be able to personally tell him that we believe—the Venezuelan people, because this is a prize of the Venezuelan people—certainly want to, to give it to him and share it with him.” — María Corina Machado on sharing her Nobel Prize with President Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The U.S. remains heavily involved in Venezuela’s oil market and its democratic transition, with Machado expressing admiration for Trump’s leadership.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump is set to meet with Venezuela’s top opposition leader, María Corina Machado, on Thursday at the White House, according to an administration official. The meeting follows the U.S.-led military operation that removed former Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, who now faces narco-terrorism charges in the United States.

Machado—the recipient of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize—is expected to present her vision for Venezuela’s future. However, President Trump has recently expressed skepticism as to whether Machado will be widely accepted by the South American nation’s populace, stating, “She doesn’t have the support within, or the respect within, the country. She’s a very nice woman, but she doesn’t have the respect.”

Despite this, Machado has routinely praised Trump and the U.S. military for their actions against Maduro and his regime. She has recently gone so far as to suggest that her Nobel Peace Prize should be shared with Trump, stating, “I certainly would love to be able to personally tell him that we believe—the Venezuelan people, because this is a prize of the Venezuelan people—certainly want to… give it to him and share it with him.” She went on to describe Trump’s actions as “historic” and a major step toward a democratic transition.

Currently, the United States has taken a significant role in Venezuela’s affairs, particularly in its oil and gas industries, and has stated that the interim government led by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez is cooperating with American officials. The National Pulse reported last Friday that President Trump held a high-level meeting with U.S. oil and gas executives regarding the future of Venezuela’s energy industry and their commitments to invest in the country’s energy infrastructure.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Biden Judge Blocks Trump’s Order Barring Late Mail-In Ballots.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge blocked parts of President Donald J. Trump’s election reform executive order, including a provision setting Election Day as the deadline for mail-in votes.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, U.S. District Court Judge John H. Chun, Washington and Oregon state officials, and White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Friday in Washington State by Judge Chun, a Biden appointee.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Constitution assigns the states all authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of elections,” wrote Judge Chun in his ruling.

🎯IMPACT: The ruling limits the President’s power to impose changes on state election processes and is expected to be appealed by the Trump administration.

IN FULL

A federal judge in Washington State has issued an order blocking, in part, President Donald J. Trump‘s Executive Order enacting election integrity reforms. Late Friday, U.S. District Court Judge John H. Chun—a Joe Biden appointee—ruled that President Trump could not mandate Election Day as the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots, a key provision of the executive order issued in March.

The ruling comes after Washington and Oregon filed a lawsuit in April, arguing that the executive order violated the U.S. Constitution. Judge Chun stated in his 75-page decision that President Trump lacks the constitutional authority to impose such changes on state election processes. “The Constitution assigns the states all authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of elections,” Chun wrote, adding that the President’s authority to establish a national ballot-receipt deadline does not exist under the Constitution.

Trump’s March Executive Order also sought to withhold funding from states that do not require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote. This provision was similarly blocked by the court. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown (D) called the ruling “a huge victory for voters in Washington and Oregon, and for the rule of law.”

President Trump has consistently criticized mail-in ballots as vulnerable to fraud. On Truth Social, Trump previously announced plans to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines, stating, “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.”

The White House has indicated that it will challenge the ruling, with Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson stating, “President Trump cares deeply about the integrity of our elections and his executive order takes lawful actions to ensure election security. This is not the final say on the matter, and the administration expects ultimate victory on the issue.” In November, the U.S. Supreme Court took up a separate case on the legality of accepting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, with oral arguments and a ruling expected sometime this year.

Image via League of Women Voters of California.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump’s FCC Closes Loophole Allowing Criminal Access to High-End Burner Phones.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday a significant change to a 2007 phone unlocking rule, which it says has inadvertently aided criminal enterprises that wish to use higher-end devices as difficult-to-trace burner phones.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The FCC, Verizon, TracFone, and criminal organizations, including drug cartels.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The rule change was announced on Monday, January 12, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Sophisticated criminal networks have exploited the FCC’s handset unlocking policies to carry out criminal acts—including transnational handset trafficking schemes and facilitating broader criminal enterprises like drug running and human smuggling.” — FCC Chairman Brendan Carr

🎯IMPACT: The FCC contends the rule change reduces access to difficult-to-trace “burner” style high-end phones for criminal operations.

IN FULL

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday a significant change to a 2007 phone unlocking rule, which it says has inadvertently aided criminal enterprises that wish to use higher-end devices as difficult-to-trace burner phones. According to the FCC, the nearly two-decade-old phone unlocking policy stipulates that Verizon phones—specifically—must become unlockable from the carrier no more than 60 days after activation. For other cellular carriers, their devices had to be configured so that consumers could unlock them after one year.

Federal officials contend that the significantly shorter unlocking timeline for Verizon—along with its acquisition of prepaid and no-contract mobile virtual network operator TracFone Wireless—created a perverse incentive for criminal elements to target Verizon stores to steal higher-end phones. “Sophisticated criminal networks have exploited the FCC’s handset unlocking policies to carry out criminal acts—including transnational handset trafficking schemes and facilitating broader criminal enterprises like drug running and human smuggling,” FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said regarding the updated FCC rule. He continued, “By waiving a regulation that incentivized bad actors to target one particular carrier’s handsets for theft, we now have a uniform industry standard that can help stem the flow of handsets into the black market.”

Under the new waiver order, Verizon will be brought into alignment with the Cellular Telephone Industries Association (CTIA) Consumer Code for Wireless Service, established in 2013. The FCC contends this will better help reduce drug cartels and other criminal operations’ access to unlocked and difficult-to-trace “burner” style phones.

“Due to its unique unlocking responsibility, Verizon’s unlocked handsets have too often been effectively stolen and resold on the black market, commanding premium prices on the dark web, particularly in countries like Russia, China, and Cuba,” the FCC contends, adding, “The record demonstrates that the 60-day device locking period is insufficient for the company to effectively detect fraud before unlocking takes place… Time and again, federal and state law enforcement has investigated and prosecuted transnational handset trafficking schemes, finding they facilitate broader criminal enterprises like drug and human smuggling.”

The move by the FCC comes as the Trump administration continues to ramp up operations against Central and South American drug cartels and criminal illegal immigrant gangs operating within the United States. Notably, Verizon supports the FCC action, with Kathy Grillo, Senior Vice President of Public Policy, stating, “The FCC’s action will end bad actors’ ability to exploit the FCC’s unlocking rules to profit from easier access to expensive, heavily-subsidized devices in the U.S. that they traffic and sell to other parts of the world.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU Wants ‘Farage Clause’ to Punish Britain If Reform Party Wins Power and Challenges Brussels.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) is reportedly demanding a “Farage clause” in a so-called Brexit reset deal being negotiated by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, which would impose a financial penalty if a future government headed by Brexit champion Nigel Farage withdraws from the agreement.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The EU, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and Nigel Farage.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Negotiations between Starmer and the EU are ongoing in Europe, with implications for the next British general election and beyond.

💬KEY QUOTE: “No Parliament may bind its successor and we will not honour any clause. If Starmer signs this, it’s a democratic outrage.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: Critics argue the clause undermines British sovereignty, with Reform promising to overturn any such agreement if elected.

IN FULL

The European Union (EU) is said to be demanding a so-called “Farage clause” in its ongoing negotiations for a Brexit “reset” with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who previously campaigned against Brexit and in favor of a second referendum to overturn it. The “Farage clause” would require British taxpayers to pay substantial financial compensation if a future government, possibly headed by Brexit champion Nigel Farage, were to withdraw from any proposed deal.

Reports indicate that Brussels views the clause as a “safety provision to provide stability and a deterrent for Farage and Co,” with one unnamed EU diplomat telling British press that “The EU wants an agreement long-term and not only until 2029, should a change happen at the next election.” Notably, Britain’s next general election must be held no later than 2029, with recent polls consistently showing Nigel Farage’s Reform Party in first place.

Prime Minister Starmer is pursuing closer “alignment” with the EU in sectors including agriculture, food production, and energy, which would effectively mean handing over much of the control over the regulation of these sectors to EU control. Farage has condemned this approach of undoing Britain’s separation from the EU piecemeal as a “Brexit betrayal,” effectively handing sovereignty back to the EU and subjecting the country to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

Farage has pledged to terminate any agreement with the EU signed by Starmer if Reform gains power. In response to reports that the EU is seeking to make this prohibitively expensive, Farage declared, “No Parliament may bind its successor and we will not honour any clause. If Starmer signs this, it’s a democratic outrage.”

Since Britain voted to leave the EU in 2016, a British political class and civil service largely opposed to cutting ties with the bloc has repeatedly sabotaged Brexit. The exit deal currently in place was negotiated largely by former Prime Minister Theresa May, who campaigned against Brexit, and civil servant Olly Robbins, who previously headed a club dedicated to transforming the EU into a federal union along the lines of the United States, with its member states giving up even more sovereignty. May’s successor, Boris Johnson, made only cosmetic changes to her deal, retaining contentious provisions such as an agreement to remain subject to the European Court of Human Rights, and to leave Northern Ireland effectively still inside the EU for most purposes.

Image by Owain.davies.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Support Floods In for ICE Agent After Minneapolis Shooting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Jonathan Ross, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who fatally shot anti-ICE agitator Renee Nicole Good when she attempted to run him over with her SUV, has raised $350,000 for his legal defense fund.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Renee Nicole Good and ICE agent Jonathan Ross.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The shooting occurred in Minneapolis, Minnesota, last Wednesday morning, sparking violent protests over the weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am a big believer in our legal principle that one is innocent until proven guilty.” – Bill Ackman

🎯IMPACT: Protests erupted nationwide, and funding campaigns have been launched for both Good’s family and Ross’s legal defense.

IN FULL

Jonathan Ross, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who fatally shot anti-ICE agitator Renee Nicole Good when she attempted to run him over with her SUV, has raised $350,000 for his legal defense fund. The new high mark comes as hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman announced he has contributed $10,000 to Ross’s defense, stating, “I am a big believer in our legal principle that one is innocent until proven guilty.”

Ackman also expressed that he would contribute to the fundraiser for the family of Good, but noted the account had already closed after raising $1.5 million. Last Wednesday, Good was shot and killed after using her vehicle, at the admitted encouragement of her female partner, Rebecca Good, to block and harass federal law enforcement officers in Minneapolis, Minnesota. After being given a lawful order to stop and exit the vehicle, Renee Good accelerated forward toward Ross, prompting the ICE agent to fire upon her.

The corporate media at first attempted to portray Renee Good as merely a scared woman who was unaffiliated with the protests. However, numerous videos taken from the protest leading up to the shooting have subsequently shown Renee and Rebecca Good engaging in sustained interference against federal law enforcement.

Good’s death sparked a surge in violent anti-ICE protests in Minnesota, prompting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to announce the deployment of additional federal officers to the state to ensure the safety of ICE agents and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers already on site. This past weekend saw additional protests around the country, including in Washington, D.C., New York, and Seattle.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Barbie Launches Doll with ‘Flappy Hands’ and Off Center Gaze for Autists.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Mattel has introduced the first Barbie doll with autism as part of a diversity campaign.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mattel, the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, and autism charities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 12, 2026, internationally.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Seeing more depictions of autism is key to understanding and autism acceptance.” – Peter Watt, National Autistic Society

🎯IMPACT: The doll is intended to raise awareness and foster acceptance of autism among children.

IN FULL

Mattel has introduced an autistic Barbie doll as part of an ongoing push to make its toyline more “diverse.” The doll incorporates specific features like eyes that gaze slightly off to the side and more articulated joints in the elbows and wrists to help depict certain common autistic traits, such as the avoidance of direct eye contact and “hand flapping.” It also includes accessories, including noise-cancelling headphones and a fidget spinner, which some autistic children use to cope with sensory overload and hyperactivity.

“As the most diverse doll line on the market, Barbie plays an important role in a child’s early experiences, and we are dedicated to doing our part to counter social stigma through play,” said Lisa McKnight, Mattel’s executive vice president for Barbie and Dolls.

The autistic Barbie’s creation involved collaboration with the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, and is supported by multiple autism organizations. Britain’s National Autistic Society was among those to commend the doll, with managing director Peter Watt saying, “Seeing more depictions of autism is key to understanding and autism acceptance.”

The autistic Barbie follows earlier dolls in the line that have represented conditions including blindness, Down’s syndrome, and Type 1 diabetes. Mattel has also launched a range of Barbies aimed at increasing black representation, including a Rosa Parks Barbie and an Ida B. Wells Barbie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Human Remains Discovered in Washington, D.C. Park.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Human remains were uncovered during construction at Volta Park in Georgetown, halting renovation work.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Georgetown residents, construction crews, the D.C. Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), and the D.C. Archaeologist.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Volta Park, Georgetown, with the human remains first discovered last summer.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They have been left exposed for months, through rain and snow, and I have even seen dogs running over them. There are no tarps or coverings on the piles at all,” wrote a concerned resident to Popville.

🎯IMPACT: The site has been secured, and plans are underway to respectfully reinter the remains and complete renovations by spring 2026.

IN FULL

During construction at Volta Park in Georgetown this past summer, work came to a halt when human remains were discovered. Crews uncovered bones during renovation efforts, which were then collected and submitted to the D.C. Archaeologist‘s office for analysis.

Local residents raised concerns last week, writing to the neighborhood blog Popville about the lack of proper covering for the remains still in the park. One resident shared, “They have been left exposed for months, through rain and snow, and I have even seen dogs running over them. There are no tarps or coverings on the piles at all.”

Finally, last week, the human remains were covered with a tarp, and the site was marked with yellow flags. The Washington, D.C. Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) issued a statement confirming the site had been secured and that they are working with the D.C. Archaeologist and contracted archaeologists to develop a plan for respectfully reinterning the disarticulated remains.

“DPR anticipates completing drainage work by the end of winter, with field restoration underway for a spring reopening once the grass is established,” the statement read, concerning the timeline for the conclusion of renovations to the park. Volta Park is situated on the grounds of the former Presbyterian Burying Ground, a historic cemetery.

Image by Elvert Barnes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.