Monday, March 16, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

As U.S. Carrier Strike Group Arrives in Middle East, Trump Says Iran Wants a Deal.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group moved into the Central Command region, which includes Iran, amid heightened tensions with the U.S.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Navy personnel, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Commander General Mohammad Pakpour, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The carrier group entered the region as of Monday morning Eastern Time, January 26, 2026, in the Middle East.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They want to make a deal. I know so. They called on numerous occasions. They want to talk,” said President Trump.

🎯IMPACT: The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group comes amid possible strikes against the Islamic Republic following a deadly crackdown on anti-regime protestors.

IN FULL

The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group, consisting of the carrier and three guided-missile destroyers, has entered the Central Command region of the Middle East, which includes Iran. The group carries squadrons of F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers, F-35C fighter jets, and MH-60R/S helicopters.

This development follows renewed warnings from Iran, with General Mohammad Pakpour of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stating, “The Islamic Revolutionary Guards and dear Iran stand more ready than ever, finger on the trigger, to execute the orders and directives of the Commander-in-Chief.” Iran’s Defense Ministry spokesman, Gen. Reza Talaei-Nik, also warned that any U.S. attack would be met with a “more painful and more decisive” response than in the past.

President Donald J. Trump revealed last Thursday that the U.S. had a “massive fleet” heading toward Iran “just in case” action is needed, though he added, “maybe we won’t have to use it.” He has also repeatedly warned Iranian leaders against the killing of peaceful demonstrators and mass executions of those arrested during protests.

On Monday, the U.S. President described the situation regarding Iran as being “in flux,” but suggested that Iran’s ruling mullahs are looking to cut a deal. “They want to make a deal. I know so. They called on numerous occasions. They want to talk,” Trump said. American officials stress that any deal must include a guarantee that Iran will hand over all of its enriched uranium, limit stockpiles of ballistic missiles, and end its funding of terrorist proxies. These terms are believed to be largely unacceptable to hardliners within the Iranian state.

The carrier group was reportedly not yet “on station” as of Monday morning, meaning it had not reached its ultimate position. However, its presence in the region opens a multitude of U.S. military options in the region and buffers assets should President Trump determine a strike on Iran’s regime is necessary.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Another Illegal Alien Trucker Leaves a U.S. Citizen in Critical Condition.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An illegal alien truck driver was accused of causing a crash that left a U.S. citizen in critical condition in Indianapolis, Indiana.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sukhdev Singh, a 25-year-old illegal alien, and a U.S. citizen pedestrian.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 6, at E Raymond Street and I-65 in Indianapolis, Indiana.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is common sense: illegal aliens should not be operating 18-wheelers on American highways.” – DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis

🎯IMPACT: Renewed scrutiny on state policies allowing illegal immigrants to obtain commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs).

IN FULL

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested Sukhdev Singh, an illegal immigrant truck driver accused of causing a crash that left a U.S. citizen in critical condition in Indianapolis, Indiana. The incident occurred on March 6 at E Raymond Street and I-65, where Singh allegedly struck a pedestrian.

Indiana State Police responded to the scene and took Singh into custody, contacting ICE when they discovered the truck driver was an illegal immigrant. ICE officials later confirmed Singh’s arrest and stated that he will remain in custody pending the outcome of his immigration proceedings. The victim was transported to a local hospital and remains in critical condition as of the latest update.

Singh, who held a commercial driver’s license (CDL) issued by Democrat-run New York, has drawn renewed attention to state policies regarding the issuance of CDLs to illegal immigrants. The National Pulse reported last December that U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Sean Duffy had warned New York it could lose $73 million in federal highway funding following a Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) audit which revealed that 53 percent of sampled CDLs issued by the New York Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) were unlawfully granted to foreign nationals residing in the U.S. illegally.

In February, the Trump administration moved to shut down an estimated 8,000 sham truck driving schools that served as conduits for illegal immigrants to obtain CDLs. The FMCSA has found that, in that month alone, 550 CDL truck driving schools and training facilities violated its standards.

“It is common sense: illegal aliens should not be operating 18-wheelers on American highways,” Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement, continuing, “We are praying this individual makes a full recovery. It is incredibly dangerous for illegal aliens, who often don’t know our traffic laws or even English, to be operating 18-wheelers on America’s roads.”

“Sanctuary governors like Kathy Hochul must stop giving illegal aliens driver’s licenses before even more Americans get injured or killed,” Bis added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New York Post Reveals How Migrants Are Voting in U.S. Elections.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A detailed investigation published by the New York Post reveals systemic failures in America’s voter registration and electoral system have allowed for hundreds of thousands of noncitizens to register as voters in U.S. elections.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Representative Chip Roy (R-TX), Public Interest Legal Foundation president J. Christian Adams, and noncitizen voters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The report was published on March 16, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I wish it were a conspiracy plot because it would be easier to bust. This is systemic failure.”  – J. Christian Adams

🎯IMPACT: President Donald J. Trump is pushing the SAVE America Act, legislation aiming to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections. However, the bill is stalled in the Senate, unable to overcome a Democrat filibuster.

IN FULL

A detailed investigation published by the New York Post reveals systemic failures in America’s voter registration and electoral system that have allowed hundreds of thousands of noncitizens to register to vote in U.S. elections. While allegations of concerted efforts by Democrat-aligned nonprofits and electioneering groups seeking to register noncitizens have dominated headlines, The Post has found that government-sanctioned voter registration programs, a lack of election law enforcement, and a lack of awareness on the part of noncitizens are more often at fault for illegal registrations.

“At times, it’s an organic process of aliens getting sucked in unwittingly. Maybe they’d been whipping down Modelos [beers] at a festival, and they’re doing some guy a favor who is in their face with a clipboard. Or, they’re at the DMV and get these pop-up windows asking them to register. They think, ‘I must be allowed,’” J. Christian Adams, president of Public Interest Legal Foundation, explained. “I wish it were a conspiracy plot because it would be easier to bust. This is systemic failure.”

“It’s way worse than the left says, but it’s way better than some others say,” Adams suggested.

The breakdowns in election law and procedures meant to prevent noncitizens from registering to vote and casting ballots in American elections may occur primarily at the local level. Database glitches, human error, and negligence are most often cited as the cause for noncitizens appearing on voter rolls. This is compounded by a general lack of awareness and confusion among noncitizens, who, as Adams noted, are often presented with the option to register to vote when filing paperwork at their local DMV, despite this being illegal.

Concerningly, data published by Rasmussen Reports in 2024 suggests a significant number of noncitizens are voting in American elections in contravention of federal law. According to the pollster, 97 percent of noncitizens polled acknowledged having voted for a candidate in the 2020 presidential election. In one survey, Rasmussen Reports polled 2,466 likely U.S. voters, of whom 222 either stated they were noncitizens or did not know their citizenship status—meaning 10 percent of the sample had questionable voting eligibility.

The potential impact that noncitizen voters could have in U.S. elections—especially local contests or races with very narrow margins of victory—has become a top issue for American voters. Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are pushing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act, legislation aiming to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections.

Proponents, including President Donald J. Trump and Representative Chip Roy (R-TX), argue the measure is essential to protect election integrity. However, the bill is currently stalled in the Senate, unable to overcome a Democrat filibuster. Polling shows over 70 percent of voters support the SAVE Act, including half of Democrats.

Image by Chris Phan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rasmussen: 61% Say Iran Strikes ‘Successful.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A recent Rasmussen Reports survey found that nearly two-thirds of American voters view the ongoing military operation against Iran as a success, though doubts remain about the United States’ alliance with Israel.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: 1,098 likely U.S. voters, as surveyed by Rasmussen Reports.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The survey was conducted nationally via telephone and online, from March 8-10, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The ongoing U.S. war against Iran is viewed as a success by most voters, although many have doubts about America’s military alliance with Israel.” – Rasmussen Reports

🎯IMPACT: The survey suggests the public believes President Donald J. Trump’s strikes on Iran are succeeding, but also reveals increasing skepticism toward American relations with Israel.

IN FULL

A new voter survey released by Rasmussen Reports has found that nearly two-thirds of American voters see President Donald J. Trump‘s authorization of U.S. military operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran as successful. According to the poll, 61 percent of likely American voters believe Operation Epic Fury has been successful so far, with 35 percent of respondents rating the strikes as “Very Successful.”

“The ongoing U.S. war against Iran is viewed as a success by most voters, although many have doubts about America’s military alliance with Israel,” Rasmussen Reports said of the poll, which was conducted between March 8 and 10, surveying 1,098 likely U.S. voters.

Twenty-nine percent of likely voters surveyed said they do not consider the military operation as successful, including 12 percent who describe the strikes as “Not At All Successful.” An additional 11 percent remain unsure about the operation’s effectiveness.

Meanwhile, the data found that a majority of likely voters neither see the U.S. alliance with Israel as good nor as bad for America. According to the survey, just 44 percent of respondents said the alliance is good for the United States, while 36 percent said it is not good. Notably, 20 percent said they were unsure.

The view of U.S.-Israeli relations becomes more stark when broken down along partisan identification. Rasmussen Reports found that just 26 percent of Democrats view the alliance as good for America, while 53 percent said it is bad. Among Republicans, 70 percent said the alliance with Israel is good for the U.S., while just 19 percent said it is bad. Independent voters split nearly evenly on the issue, with 38 percent saying it is good, and 35 percent describing the alliance as bad for America.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

WATCH: ‘I Can Do Anything I Want With It’ — Trump Predicts He Will Have ‘The Honor’ of ‘Taking Cuba.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has predicted that he will be the American leader to have “the honor” of finally “taking Cuba.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. President Donald J. Trump, Cuban exiles, and the Communist Party of Cuba.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 16, 2026, in the Oval Office.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba. That’s a big honor.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s comments add to the rising speculation that his administration is preparing to topple Cuba’s communist regime, which is reeling from an energy crisis caused by the removal of Marxist dictator Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which was Cuba’s chief source of oil.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump told the press he expects to be the U.S. leader who finally has “the honor” of “taking Cuba” in comments in the Oval Office on Monday. “A lot of Cubans have said, oh boy, would they love to go back… It’s a beautiful island; great weather,” he said, adding, “All my life I’ve been hearing about the United States and Cuba, ‘When will the United States do it?’ I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba. That’s a big honor.”

When asked by a reporter to clarify his remarks, Trump confirmed, “Taking Cuba, in some form, yeah,” emphasizing, “I mean, whether I free it, take it, I think I can do anything I want with it, if you wanna know the truth. They’re a very weakened nation right now.” Notably, Cuba is currently experiencing an energy crisis, precipitated by the U.S. ouster of Marxist dictator Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which was the communist-led island’s main source of oil.

Residents in central Cuba partially destroyed a local communist party headquarters during a protest over energy and food shortages over the weekend, underscoring the growing strain the regime is facing. The country’s leadership is already in talks with the Trump administration—at the same time as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is building a criminal case against them.

Trump’s comments on Monday follow comments earlier this month predicting “Cuba’s going to fall” and mulling the possibility of a “friendly takeover.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Dems Want CRIMINAL CHARGES For Ousted Kristi Noem. Here’s Why…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Congressional Democrats have requested criminal charges against outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, alleging she lied to Congress during recent hearings.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), Kristi Noem, President Donald J. Trump, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The accusations stem from testimony given earlier this month during oversight hearings in Congress.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Any claim that Secretary Noem committed perjury is categorically FALSE.” – DHS spokesman

🎯IMPACT: The allegations are unlikely to lead to criminal charges in the near term, though the statute of limitations for perjury extends for five years.

IN FULL

Congressional Democrats are pursuing criminal charges against outgoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, accusing her of making false statements during recent testimony. The allegations are detailed in a letter sent to the Department of Justice (DOJ) by Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), who claim Noem violated statutes prohibiting perjury and knowingly providing false statements to Congress.

“A number of her statements appear to violate criminal statutes prohibiting perjury and knowingly making false statements to Congress,” the Congressional Democrat letter states. It adds, “After months of evading our Committees’ requests to testify in routine oversight hearings, Secretary Noem made a series of demonstrably false statements in a brazen attempt to undermine critical congressional oversight of the Department of Homeland Security.”

The Democrat lawmakers allege that Noem’s testimony included misleading answers on topics such as DHS compliance with court orders, the role of Corey Lewandowski in DHS contracts, immigration enforcement practices, and the bidding process for a $220 million advertising campaign. During the hearings, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Noem about the ad campaign, which heavily featured her and allegedly lacked a competitive bidding process. Noem insisted the contracts were competitively bid and approved by career officials, but Kennedy and others have expressed skepticism.

The advertising campaign’s ties to former DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin and her husband, Benjamin Yoho, have also drawn scrutiny. Kennedy stated during a hearing earlier this month, “It’s something we have to defend. I’m on the Appropriations Committee. I mean, my research shows that you did not bid them out.”

Democrats argue that Noem’s testimony misrepresented facts, with Durbin and Raskin writing, “Even if Secretary Noem was the one telling the truth about the President’s knowledge, and she may well have been, she flatly misrepresented that the contract had been subject to a competitive bid.” The Trump administration has defended Noem, with a DHS spokesman calling the perjury claims “categorically FALSE.”

Noem’s removal from her position as DHS Secretary as of March 31 was recently announced by President Donald J. Trump. She has been reassigned to serve as a special envoy to the Shield of the Americas. Trump has nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) to replace her, with confirmation hearings expected soon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Lake Mead Is In Real Trouble, Which Means So Are Phoenix and Las Vegas.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal forecasts predict Lake Mead could sink to a record low within the next two years, falling below its 2022 levels.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Sharon Megdal of the University of Arizona, and stakeholders in the Colorado River system.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Projections released Friday indicate Lake Mead’s November 2027 level will fall to 1,032.76 feet above sea level. Lake Mead and Lake Powell are part of the Colorado River system in the Southwestern U.S.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Urgent, collective action is essential—we must move forward together, without further delay.” – Peter Soeth, USBR deputy chief of public affairs

🎯IMPACT: The Colorado River system faces critical strain, jeopardizing water supplies, irrigation, and hydropower generation for millions.

IN FULL

Water levels at Lake Mead in the Southwestern United States could hit an unprecedented low within the next two years, according to new federal forecasts. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) projects that the reservoir‘s November 2027 end-of-month level will reach 1,032.76 feet above sea level. This would be nearly eight feet below the previous record low set in 2022, when drought conditions exposed skeletal remains.

Lake Mead is a critical reservoir and part of the Colorado River system, which—along with Lake Powell—helps provide irrigation for over five million acres of farmland and drinking water to an estimated 40 million people across the Southwest. As of March 13, the lake was only 34 percent full, with 8.8 million acre-feet of water in storage—roughly 53 percent of the average level for the date.

Peter Soeth, USBR deputy chief of public affairs, emphasized the urgency of addressing the issue, stating, “Reclamation is closely monitoring hydrologic conditions and coordinating with stakeholders. The basin’s continued poor hydrologic outlook underscores the need for collaboration as we develop new operating guidelines for the Colorado River system. Urgent, collective action is essential—we must move forward together, without further delay.”

Concerningly, Lake Powell is also at risk, with earlier forecasts suggesting it could drop to minimum hydropower levels by this coming December. Such a scenario could threaten Glen Canyon Dam’s ability to generate electricity. Sharon Megdal, director of the University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center, described the situation as dire, stating, “Currently, the water-in-storage situation for the Colorado River system is not good. [There is] less in storage than last year, and current snow conditions are not good. Even if early 2026 snowpack is robust, the system will remain highly stressed.”

Major population centers across the Southwest—including Phoenix, Arizona, and Las Vegas, Nevada—are heavily reliant on the Colorado River system and its reservoir lakes for water. Without the system, neither city would be able to adequately provide drinking water to sustain its population.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Border Chief Ousted After Minnesota Climbdown, Greg Bovino, Retires.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Gregory Bovino, a prominent Border Patrol official, announced his retirement after nearly 30 years of service.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol agents, former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, and former White House Border Czar Tom Homan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Bovino announced his retirement in March 2026, following his removal from Minnesota operations earlier in the year.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The greatest honor of my entire life was to work alongside Border Patrol agents on the border and in the interior of the United States in some of the most challenging conditions the agency has ever faced,” said Bovino.

🎯IMPACT: Bovino’s operations, including “Operation Trojan Horse” and “Operation Midway Blitz,” resulted in thousands of arrests and demonstrated innovative enforcement methods.

IN FULL

Former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino is set to retire from the federal agency at the end of March 2026, capping a nearly 30-year career with the agency. Bovino expressed deep pride in his service, saying, “The greatest honor of my entire life was to work alongside Border Patrol agents on the border and in the interior of the United States in some of the most challenging conditions the agency has ever faced.”

He added, “Watching these agents out there giving it their all in some of the most dangerous of environments we have ever faced was humbling.” Bovino had been a central figure in President Donald J. Trump’s immigration enforcement initiatives, directing operations in major urban areas including Los Angeles, Chicago, and New Orleans. In Los Angeles, the “Operation Trojan Horse” effort resulted in more than 5,000 arrests, while “Operation Midway Blitz” in Chicago led to over 3,000 arrests. Bovino often deployed alongside agents in person, tangling with pro-illegal immigrant agitators hand-to-hand.

His departure follows his removal earlier this year from leading immigration enforcement activities in Minnesota. There, he had been collaborating with then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on a major operation that faced stiff resistance from anti-ICE agitators, two of whom, Alex Pretti and Renee Good, were fatally shot by federal agents during confrontations. Following these incidents, White House Border Czar Tom Homan replaced both Bovino and Noem in overseeing the Minnesota efforts, which were rapidly wound down, seemingly in deference to the demonstrators and state Democrats.

Bovino began his career in the El Centro Sector of California in 1996, and he currently holds the position of chief patrol agent there. He has not shared any details about his plans after leaving the agency.

Image by Chad Davis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The BBC Wants Trump’s Defamation Suit Dismissed on a Technicality.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The BBC has filed a motion in a U.S. court to dismiss President Donald J. Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over a documentary that edited his January 6, 2021, speech, claiming that because the film never aired in Florida, the court has no jurisdiction.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The BBC, President Donald J. Trump, and the Southern District of Florida federal court.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in December 2025 in Florida, with a trial date set for February 2027.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Early dismissal is favored given the powerful interest in ensuring that free speech is not unduly burdened by the necessity of defending against expensive yet groundless litigation,” the BBC argued in its motion.

🎯IMPACT: The BBC has subsequently been exposed as having edited other remarks by President Trump and White House officials, raising concerns about editorial impartiality and the truthfulness of media portrayals of political leaders.

IN FULL

The BBC has asked a U.S. court to dismiss a $10 billion lawsuit filed by President Donald J. Trump, arguing that the case could have a “chilling effect” on reporting about public figures. The lawsuit, filed in a Florida court in December 2025, centers on a BBC documentary that edited Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech, splicing together clips of remarks Trump made to create a false narrative of him encouraging violence.

According to the filing, the British broadcaster contends that the Florida court lacks jurisdiction and that Trump failed to demonstrate that the BBC knowingly intended to misrepresent him.

In its 34-page filing, the BBC claims that Trump’s lawsuit “falls well short of the high bar of actual malice” required for a defamation case involving a public figure. The National Pulse reported earlier this month that the broadcaster was caught editing remarks by other Trump administration officials, including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

“Early dismissal is favored given the powerful interest in ensuring that free speech is not unduly burdened by the necessity of defending against expensive yet groundless litigation, which would constrict the breathing space needed to ensure robust reporting on public figures and events,” attorneys for the BBC state.

The documentary, titled Trump: A Second Chance?, aired shortly before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. It spliced together segments of Trump’s January 6 speech, omitting his call for peaceful demonstrations, and appeared to depict him encouraging supporters to storm the Capitol. Trump’s lawsuit accuses the BBC of defamation and unfair trade practices, seeking $5 billion in damages for each claim.

Last November, the BBC admitted its editing gave “the impression of a direct call for violent action,” leading to apologies from its chairman and the resignations of its top executive and head of news. However, the broadcaster denies defaming Trump and maintains that the lawsuit threatens freedom of speech. A federal judge has tentatively scheduled the trial for February 2027.

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Blasts Starmer Over UK Iran Response, But Ordinary Britons Don’t Want Involvement, Either.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Donald Trump criticized international allies, including the UK, Germany, and Australia, for their reluctance to support his proposal for a multinational naval force to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Boris Pistorius, Antonio Tajani, and Sanae Takaichi, among others.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Ongoing discussions amidst the Iran war, with events occurring in the Middle East, the UK, and other global hubs.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I was very surprised with the United Kingdom because… two weeks ago I said, ‘Why don’t you send some ships over?’ And he really did not want to do it.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The lack of international support complicates efforts to secure the Strait of Hormuz, exacerbating tensions in the Middle East and fueling global energy market instability.

IN FULL

Donald Trump has criticized several key allies, including the UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Australia, for their hesitation to join his proposed multinational naval force to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway has become a flashpoint amid the ongoing Iran war, with oil supply routes disrupted due to Iranian aggression.

The US president expressed disappointment in the UK’s response, singling out Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for failing to take decisive action. “I said ‘you don’t want to do it, we’ve been with you, you are our oldest ally, and we spend a lot of money on NATO… to protect you,’” Trump stated. He also criticized Starmer’s leadership approach, saying, “You don’t need to meet up with the team, you are the Prime Minister, you can make your own [decision].”

While Trump has called for greater international involvement, allies like Germany and Australia have declined to participate. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius remarked, “This is not our war, we have not started it,” while Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani noted that his country’s naval efforts remain focused on the Red Sea.

Public opinion appears to reflect the sentiments of European leaders, many of whom view the conflict as Israeli-led and not in their interests.

Most Britons believe the UK should be “purely defensive,’ with 46 percent favoring shooting down drones and defending civilian and military sites. About 26 percent support a “retaliatory only’ role, attacking military targets that strike civilians or UK forces, but avoid wider involvement.

Only 8 percent of Britons want the UK to join the conflict, launching attacks in Iran.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of global oil supplies pass, has driven up oil prices and heightened global market instability. Naval experts have warned of the risks involved in escorting oil tankers through the strait, citing potential Iranian drone attacks.

Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

RFK Jr. Orders Health Providers and Insurers to Disclose Rates, Publicly Post Prices.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that healthcare providers and insurers must publicly post their prices for services.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., healthcare providers, insurance companies, and the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement follows a February 25 Executive Order reimplementing Trump’s healthcare pricing policy from his first administration.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re requiring all providers in this country to post their prices publicly.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

🎯IMPACT: The policy aims to increase transparency and drive down healthcare costs through competition.

IN FULL

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Monday that doctors, healthcare providers, and insurers will be required to publicly post the prices of their services. The HHS action comes after a February 25 Executive Order signed by President Donald J. Trump that mandates enforcement of a pricing transparency policy enacted during the first Trump administration but saw limited enforcement under former President Joe Biden.

“The insurance companies… the doctors and the hospitals are going to have to tell you, before you go in there, exactly what their price schedule is,” Secretary Kennedy said in a clip posted to X (formerly Twitter). “So, now, we’re requiring all providers in this country to post their prices publicly.”

“If you want an MRI, and you wanted to shop around and find… the cheapest MRI, you wouldn’t have been able to do that, but now you’re going to be able to do that,” Kennedy explained, adding, “You’re going to be able to shop around, and that’s going to drive down prices.”

Notably, the pricing transparency policy also extends to insurance companies, which will now be required to post what they compensate providers. “We’re also forcing the insurance industries to post what they compensate the providers, and that is going to drive down health care prices,” he said, adding that forcing transparency from insurers will allow companies to better negotiate with insurance providers.

The move builds on the Trump administration’s “Great Healthcare Plan,” launched in January 2026, which requires healthcare providers and insurers accepting Medicare or Medicaid to prominently display pricing and fees in their places of business.

In 2023, the former Biden government was sued in federal court for failing to implement the 2021 price transparency policy and was subsequently forced to reverse course and begin enforcement.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.