The Virginia Supreme Court is maintaining a lower court block on the certification of the state’s redistricted electoral map, prolonging the legal battle over its constitutionality.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Virginia Supreme Court has declined to lift a block on certifying the results of a referendum on changing the state’s electoral map in a manner that favors the Democrats. The results were initially blocked by a lower court, citing concerns over the referendum’s constitutionality. 📺 DETAIL: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court of Virginia denied a motion put forward by Jay Jones, Attorney General of Virginia (D), to overturn a ruling disallowing the certification of the results of the state’s redistricting referendum. In a state-wide vote last week, voters in Virginia narrowly approved a measure to redraw its congressional map in a way that heavily favors the incumbent Democrats. However, following the results, Tazewell County Circuit Court blocked its implementation. The lower court decided the referendum and the law authorizing it were unconstitutional, and that the process and ballot language used were legally flawed. Democrats made a legal push to get the results certified, with attorneys Richard Hawkins and Matthew Seligman, along with Solicitor General Tillman Breckenridge, putting the case. 💬 KEY QUOTE: “The current attorney general of Virginia… in his public statements; the only defense I’ve heard him offer is the ‘will of the people’… and his own lawyer in court today says that was irrelevant,” commented Ken Cuccinelli, former Attorney General of Virginia. 🎯 IMPACT: The Virginia Supreme Court’s decision delays the implementation of the Democrats’ redistricting plan, creating uncertainty ahead of the midterm elections in November. The decision by Virginia’s Supreme Court comes at a time when multiple states, such as California, Texas, and Florida, are scrambling to redraw their congressional maps before the midterms. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.