Top Democrats and former Republicans met at a Washington, D.C. think tank in early June 2023 to discuss election interference strategies to block former President Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House, according to a report in the Washington Post.
The meeting is said to have included recent Biden White House chief of staff Ron Klain, Democratic National Committee senior advisor Cedric L. Richmond, as well as Stephanie Cutter, a former campaign adviser to Barack Obama who has also worked with Biden.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
“They were joined by former senators Doug Jones (D-Ala.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), along with representatives of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, former Weekly Standard publisher Bill Kristol and Lucy Caldwell, a former Republican consultant who now advises the independent Forward Party, according to people present at the event, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the event was private,” reports the Post.
In total, there were around 40 people in the room, with others – such as Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina, former Howard Dean 2004 campaign manager Joe Trippi, Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright, Investing in U.S. co-founder Dmitri Mehlhorn and Lincoln Project co-founder Reed Galen – connecting in by Zoom.
The meeting even included Hilltop Public Solutions partner Patrick Dillon, the former Obama White House deputy political director who is married to current Biden White House deputy chief of staff Jen O’Malley Dillon.
In 2019/20, a similar group named the “Transition Integrity Project” was convened, featuring stars from Soros world, as well as John Podesta, and even China-linked individuals. The group “war-gamed” a scenario in which Trump declared victory, but Biden’s vote totals continued to climb overnight. Podesta, playing Biden in the war game, then convinced states to offer up competing electors.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is increasing pressure on Ukraine to begin peace negotiations with Russia, urging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to accept the reality that the country is losing the war.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The interview was released on Tuesday, December 9, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “You know, when you’re losing… they’ve lost territory long before I got here. They lost a whole strip of seafront, big seafront… You certainly wouldn’t say it’s a victory.” — Trump
🎯IMPACT: In recent months, the Trump White House has expressed increasing frustration with both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin over their intransigence toward finding an end to the conflict between their nations.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump is increasing pressure on Ukraine to begin peace negotiations with Russia, stating during an interview released on Tuesday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “[has] to get on the ball and start accepting things.” Speaking with POLITICO, Trump urged Zelensky and the wider world to begin dealing with the reality of the Russian war in Ukraine: “You know, when you’re losing… they’ve lost territory long before I got here. They lost a whole strip of seafront, big seafront… You certainly wouldn’t say it’s a victory.”
aJUST IN – Trump on Zelensky: “He’s gonna have to get on the ball and start accepting things. You know, when you’re losing… they’ve lost territory long before I got here. They lost a whole strip of seafront, big seafront…You certainly wouldn’t say it’s a victory.” pic.twitter.com/hoSdg1j7bQ
President Trump previously suggested that Zelensky has yet even to review the details of the peace proposal. “A lot of people are dying, so it would be really good if he’d read it. His people loved the proposal… I think he should find time to read it,” the U.S President said.
JUST IN – Trump’s Politico interview: Zelensky hasn’t even read the peace proposal yet: “A lot of people are dying, so it would be really good if he’d read it. His people loved the proposal… I think he should find time to read it.” pic.twitter.com/Ae4M2UOjgH
In recent months, the Trump White House has expressed increasing frustration with both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin over their intransigence toward finding an end to the conflict between their nations. Trump has consistently noted that the war is costing significant lives on both sides and has tried to push both leaders to the negotiating table.
Acknowledging the reality on the ground, Trump said, “I give the people of Ukraine and the military of Ukraine tremendous credit for the, you know, bravery and for the fighting and all of that. But, you know, at some point, size will win, generally.” While Trump stated that recent comments that the U.S. would soon walk away from Ukraine were “not correct,” he did acknowledge that it wasn’t “exactly wrong,” arguing that Zelensky must “play ball.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump stated during an interview that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s “days are numbered” but declined to comment on the possibility of U.S. troops being sent to the country.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Nicolás Maduro, and POLITICO reporter Dasha Burns.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made in an interview with POLITICO, released on Tuesday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “His days are numbered.” – Donald Trump.
🎯IMPACT: The statements highlight increasing tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, with potential implications for U.S. foreign policy in the region.
IN FULL
In an interview with POLITICO released on Tuesday, President Donald J. Trump declared that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro‘s “days are numbered.” When pressed on whether U.S. troops could be sent to Venezuela, Trump declined to provide a definitive answer, stating, “I don’t comment on that” and “I wouldn’t say that one way or the other.”
The President’s remarks came amid rising tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, following recent U.S. strikes on cartel drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific. Late last month, Trump suggested the U.S. could “very soon” target Venezuelan drug traffickers on land and declared that the country’s airspace should be considered “closed.”
During the interview, Trump was asked how far he would go to remove Maduro from office. The President responded, “I don’t want to say that,” but stressed, “His days are numbered.” When asked again if he would rule out a U.S. ground invasion, Trump replied, “I don’t want to rule in or out.”
The President also addressed broader regional concerns, including the potential for similar actions against drug traffickers in Mexico and Colombia. When asked if the U.S. would consider measures like the boat strikes to combat fentanyl trafficking, Trump responded affirmatively, saying, “Yeah, I would. Sure, I would.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan (D) failed to hold mandated quarterly safety meetings before the assassination of state House Speaker Melissa Hortman (D), drawing criticism for neglecting her duties.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Peggy Flanagan, Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, and alleged assassin Vance Boelter.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The oversight spans from 2019 to 2024 in Minnesota. Hortman’s assassination occurred on June 14, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s incredibly irresponsible, and frankly just confusing, that the elected official who chairs the committee and has her office within the Capitol complex, refuses to take the responsibility of this group seriously.” – Minnesota House GOP Whip Jim Nash
🎯IMPACT: The lack of meetings has raised questions about Flanagan’s leadership and could hinder her campaign for U.S. Senate.
IN FULL
Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan (D) is facing sharp criticism for not holding the legally required quarterly meetings of the state’s Capitol security committee in the years leading up to the June 14 assassination of House Speaker Melissa Hortman and the earlier shooting of state Senator John Hoffman and his wife.
State law requires the Minnesota Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security—which Flanagan chairs—to meet four times a year to oversee safety for lawmakers, staff, and visitors. Between 2019 and 2024, however, the panel convened only 13 times instead of the mandated 24.
“The Advisory Committee on Capitol Area Security is designed to ensure that legislators, visitors, and staff at the Capitol are kept as safe as possible, but we can’t fulfill that duty if the chair refuses to actually call meetings as required by law,” said House GOP Whip Jim Nash. He added, “There are a lot of conversations to be had and decisions to be made, especially this year, and the fact that she has kept this committee on the back burner for years is shameful.”
Flanagan, currently running for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Senator Tina Smith, has defended herself, saying, “We take this very seriously and that’s how we’re going to move forward.”
The same pattern applies to another panel she leads: the Minnesota Interagency Council on Homelessness held just 15 of its required 24 quarterly meetings over the same five-year period. Critics say the repeated failure to meet legal obligations raises serious questions about her leadership as she campaigns for higher office.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A National Health Service (NHS) nurse in the United Kingdom won part of her employment tribunal case after complaining about sharing a female-only changing room with a transgender doctor.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nurse Sandie Peggie, Dr. Beth Upton (formerly Theodore), and NHS Fife.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Scotland, tribunal hearings in Dundee, with the judgment delivered this month.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I am beyond relieved and delighted that the tribunal has found that my employer Fife Health Board harassed me after I complained about having to share a female-only changing room with a male colleague.” – Sandie Peggie
🎯IMPACT: The tribunal upheld the harassment claim against NHS Fife, but dismissed allegations of discrimination and victimisation, as well as claims against Dr. Upton.
IN FULL
A British National Health Service (NHS) nurse, Sandie Peggie, has secured a partial victory at an employment tribunal against NHS Fife after raising objections to sharing a female-only changing room with a transgender doctor, Dr. Beth Upton (formerly Theodore). The dispute centred on Ms Peggie’s discomfort at sharing the space with a man, and on later allegations by Dr. Upton that Ms Peggie had engaged in bullying and harassment.
The tribunal, held in Dundee, Scotland, upheld Peggie’s claim of harassment by her employer but rejected her claims of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and victimization.
In its decision, the tribunal found that NHS Fife had acted improperly by failing to revoke permission for Upton to use the women-only changing room, and by dragging out the investigation into the complaint for an unreasonably long time. The board also made “inappropriate references to patient care allegations” against Peggie during that process, which the tribunal said contributed to the harassing conduct.
Peggie reacted to the ruling saying, “I am beyond relieved and delighted that the tribunal has found that my employer, Fife Health Board, harassed me after I complained about having to share a female-only changing room with a male colleague.”
The allegations against Upton were dismissed; the tribunal found no wrongdoing on his part. Peggie’s solicitor, Margaret Gribbon, described the outcome as “a huge win for a tenacious and courageous woman standing up for her sex-based rights,” and noted the case had been “extraordinarily lengthy and complex.”
The case comes against a broader legal backdrop that has recently changed in Britain. On April 16, 2025, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that, under the terms of the Equality Act 2010, the words “woman” and “sex” refer to biological sex at birth, not gender identity.
The court held that transgender “women” do not meet the legal definition of a woman for the purposes of certain sex-based protections and single-sex spaces such as changing rooms, refuges, hospitals, and women-only services. As a result, institutions such as hospitals, shelters, sports clubs, and other single-sex services now have clearer legal ground to exclude transgenders from female-only spaces.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Hundreds of Girlguiding volunteers have threatened to resign following a decision to restrict membership to genuine girls.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Girlguiding UK, its volunteers, and leadership figures including chairwoman Denise Wilson, chief executive Felicity Oswald, and chief guide Tracy Foster.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The policy change was announced last week, affecting Girlguiding’s 300,000 members across the United Kingdom.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We cannot, in good conscience, uphold a policy that contradicts established safeguarding research, the lived experience of our members, and the inclusive ethos we were trained to deliver.” – Volunteer Amanda Jane Heather
🎯IMPACT: The decision follows a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom upholding protections for women and girls based on biological sex, rather than so-called “gender identity.”
IN FULL
Girlguiding UK, formerly the Girl Guides, has introduced a new rule limiting membership to biological girls, prompting backlash from transgender ideologues, including some volunteers. Girlguiding, which includes around 300,000 members across the Rainbows, Brownies, Guides, and Rangers groups, said the decision followed “detailed considerations, expert legal advice, and input from senior members and trustees” following a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that “man,” “woman,” and “sex” in Britain’s Equality Act, which provide certain protections to women and girls, must be defined strictly by biological sex, not “gender identity.” That decision has already reshaped policy across several institutions. The British Football Association has banned transgender women from participating in women’s soccer, and other organizations, including major women’s charities, have announced similar shifts to comply with the ruling.
Notably, Girlguiding leaders have emphasized that current members will not be removed, with only new applicants subjected to the updated guidance, meaning they could still be running afoul of the law.
Nevertheless, the policy has caused some internal dissent. Volunteer Amanda Jane Heather has coordinated a petition, complaining, “We cannot, in good conscience, uphold a policy that contradicts established safeguarding research, the lived experience of our members, and the inclusive ethos we were trained to deliver.”
The debate mirrors tensions in other countries. In the United States, Scouting America, formerly the Boy Scouts of America, faces political pressure following the adoption of gender-inclusive policies. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has signalled intentions to withdraw federal support, accusing the organization of abandoning traditional structures in favour of “genderless” programming.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has launched a “Worst of the Worst” webpage to display information on criminal illegal immigrants arrested under the Trump administration.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: DHS, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced Monday; site available online.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Today, we launched a ‘worst of the worst’ website so every American can see for themselves the criminal illegal aliens that we are arresting, what crimes they committed, and which communities we removed them from.” – Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The webpage provides transparency on arrests, counters media narratives, and highlights criminal activity by illegal immigrants.
IN FULL
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unveiled a new “Worst of the Worst” webpage on Monday that publicly lists criminal illegal immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement operations. The site lets the public search hundreds of thousands of cases nationwide, spotlighting migrants with serious convictions, including for murder, sexual assault, child molestation, drug trafficking, and gang activity.
“While Americans across the country were enjoying their weekends and holiday shopping, ICE law enforcement was hard at work arresting pedophiles, gang members, and drug traffickers,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. “This holiday season, make sure to thank law enforcement officers for all they do to make America safe again.”
The page launches with details on 10,000 arrests and will be updated regularly. DHS says the initiative, led by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, delivers on President Donald J. Trump’s pledge to prioritize the removal of the most dangerous offenders.
Trump officials accuse corporate media outlets of downplaying the criminal records of those arrested: “As the media whitewashes the facts, day in and day out, our brave men and women of ICE risk their lives for the American people,” McLaughlin stated. “Americans don’t have to rely on the press for this information—with this transparent tool, they can see for themselves what public safety threats were lurking in their neighborhoods and communities.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: ABC announced a contract extension for Jimmy Kimmel, keeping Jimmy Kimmel Live! on the air through the 2026-2027 TV season.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and President Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made in December 2025, with Kimmel’s contract now extended beyond its original May 2026 expiration date.
💬KEY QUOTE: “THANKS FOR WATCHING LIVE!!!” – Jimmy Kimmel.
🎯IMPACT: The extension solidifies Kimmel’s presence in late-night television, despite criticism from Trump and controversy after the host appeared to blame the MAGA movement for the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk.
IN FULL
ABC has renewed Jimmy Kimmel’s contract, securing Jimmy Kimmel Live! through the 2026–2027 television season. The new deal extends beyond Kimmel’s previous agreement, which was due to end in May 2026.
The renewal arrives amid ongoing public friction between Kimmel and President Donald J. Trump, including Kimmel’s brief suspension earlier this year for appearing to blame the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement for the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk. “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel had said. The alleged gunman in the case is, in fact, a leftist who was in a relationship with a transgender.
Trump has previously called for Kimmel to be fired, recently labelling him a “talentless bum.” After ABC broke and returned Kimmel to the airwaves despite the Kirk scandal, the America First leader branded the network a “true bunch of losers,” asking: “Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) officially filed paperwork to enter the Democrat primary for the U.S. Senate in Texas.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. Jasmine Crockett and other Texas politicians.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Crockett filed her paperwork on Monday in Texas.
💬KEY QUOTE: “In the past few days, I’ve come to believe that a bruising Senate Democratic primary and runoff would prevent the Democratic Party from going into this critical election unified against the danger posed to our communities and our Constitution by Donald Trump and one of his Republican bootlickers [Ken] Paxton, [John] Cornyn, or Hunt.” – Colin Allred
🎯IMPACT: The Texas Senate race is expected to be one of the most expensive and competitive of the midterms.
IN FULL
Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) formally joined the Democratic U.S. Senate primary in Texas on Monday by submitting her paperwork, stepping in just hours after Rep. Colin Allred ended his Senate bid. Allred announced earlier the same day that he would instead run for the House in the newly created 33rd congressional district.
In the Democratic primary, Crockett will now face state Rep. James Talarico of Austin. On the Republican side, the Republican field includes Republican-in-name-only three-term incumbent Senator John Cornyn, America First state Attorney General Ken Paxton, and Rep. Wesley Hunt. The contest is expected to be one of the most expensive and closely followed Senate races of the 2026 midterms.
Allred explained his withdrawal by saying, “In the past few days, I’ve come to believe that a bruising Senate Democratic primary and runoff would prevent the Democratic Party from going into this critical election unified against the danger posed to our communities and our Constitution by Donald Trump and one of his Republican bootlickers [Ken] Paxton, [John] Cornyn, or [Wesley] Hunt.” He continued, “That’s why I’ve made the difficult decision to end my campaign for the U.S. Senate. But I’m nowhere near done serving my community and our state.”
Crockett, a prominent progressive voice and strident critic of President Donald J. Trump known for her outlandish statements and allegations, had previously said she would only enter the Senate race if polls showed a realistic path to victory in November. Recent surveys reportedly place her ahead in the Democratic primary field.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit intended to feed low-income children in Minnesota, is accused of illegally diverting over $250 million in taxpayer funds for personal luxury purchases, according to federal prosecutors.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE), former MDE leaders Brenda Cassellius and Mary Cathryn Ricker, fraudsters tied to Feeding Our Future, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D).
📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged fraud occurred between 2018 and 2021 in Minnesota, with key developments during the tenures of Cassellius and Ricker at MDE.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Many of MDE’s complaint investigation procedures and practices were inappropriate or of limited usefulness, particularly in the context of the alleged fraud. While MDE had written complaint investigation procedures, their limited scope and failure to address important issues undermined their ability to promote good investigative practices.” – Minnesota Legislative Auditor’s report.
🎯IMPACT: The alleged fraud highlights systemic failures in oversight, with MDE reportedly increasing payments to Feeding Our Future by 2,800 percent between 2020 and 2021.
IN FULL
Former heads of the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) are under scrutiny as new findings deepen the investigation into the alleged fraud surrounding Feeding Our Future (FOF), a Somali-run nonprofit that was ostensibly providing meals to low-income children. Prosecutors say FOF diverted more than $250 million in taxpayer funds to shell companies and individuals, many of whom used the money for real estate, luxury cars, and other lavish purchases, rather than meals for children.
A 20-page audit from Judy Randall and Katherine Theisen faulted MDE for failing to act on repeated warning signs before and after the pandemic. The report said MDE “did not effectively exercise its authority to hold Feeding Our Future accountable to program requirements,” and was “ill-prepared to respond to the issues it encountered.”
“Many of MDE’s complaint investigation procedures and practices were inappropriate or of limited usefulness, particularly in the context of the alleged fraud. While MDE had written complaint investigation procedures, their limited scope and failure to address important issues undermined their ability to promote good investigative practices,” the report said.
Under former Commissioner Brenda Cassellius, FOF received its initial approval and survived an administrative review in 2018. Her successor, Mary Cathryn Ricker, oversaw the department during the nonprofit’s explosive expansion; in 2020, MDE approved FOF’s summer-food-service application without re-verifying that FOF retained its nonprofit status, even though it had been revoked earlier that year by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Despite receiving at least 30 complaints about FOF’s operations, MDE rarely intervened. In one instance, the department asked FOF to investigate complaints against itself. Meanwhile, FOF’s payments surged, increasing by 2,800 percent between fiscal year 2020 and 2021. The audit also detailed a case in which the nonprofit allegedly demanded a kickback from a vendor; when the vendor declined, their contract was cancelled.
FOF’s outreach and network were deeply rooted in Minnesota’s Somali-American community, which was allegedly shielded from investigation by Minnesota Governor and failed Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz.
Prosecutors have said that many of the companies receiving funds were owned or operated by Somalis. For instance, evidence presented in federal court shows that the nonprofit Somali Community Resettlement Services sponsored several meal-distribution sites in cities like Minneapolis and Faribault, which claimed to serve thousands of meals daily but, prosecutors say, were part of the fraud.
In one case, a site backed by Somali Community Resettlement Services claimed to serve 3,000 meals a day, and another claimed 2,000. That nonprofit was reimbursed about $2.9 million via a sponsoring intermediary, and paid the purported meal-serving entities roughly $1.83 million, keeping nearly $1.1 million itself.
Federal prosecutors—including Joseph Thompson—warn that the problem goes beyond FOF. They say similar fraud has already hit other state-backed programs, such as housing stabilization and autism services. “To be clear, this is not an isolated scheme,” Thompson said.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The developer of ICEBlock, an app that tracks U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, has sued the Trump administration for supposed free speech violations after Apple removed the app from its store under government pressure.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: ICEBlock developer Joshua Aaron, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Apple, and the Trump administration.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on Monday in Washington, D.C., following Apple’s removal of the app in October.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We view that as an admission that she engaged in coercion in her official role as a government official to get Apple to remove this app,” said lawyer Noam Biale.
🎯IMPACT: If successful, the lawsuit could see ICEBlock, used to evade and potentially ambush ICE agents, returned to Apple’s app store.
IN FULL
The creator of ICEBlock—an iPhone app that lets users anonymously report and receive alerts about nearby Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity—has sued the Trump administration, claiming it violated the First Amendment. The legal action comes after Apple pulled the app from its App Store in October, which the developer says happened only after direct pressure from the White House.
Attorney General Pam Bondi openly acknowledged the administration’s involvement, saying, “We reached out to Apple today demanding they remove the ICEBlock app from their App Store—and Apple did so.” ICEBlock represents a safety threat to ICE agents, not only helping illegal immigrants evade law enforcement but also potentially providing intelligence for ambush attacks.
The developer’s attorney, Noam Biale, said of Bondi’s comments, “We view that as an admission that she engaged in coercion in her official role as a government official to get Apple to remove this app.”
Developer Joshua Aaron denies the app endangers agents, insisting the tool is peaceful and meant only to share information. “It was just the best idea I had to do everything I could to fight back against what was going on,” Aaron said, calling the administration’s commitment to deporting illegal immigrants, including pedophiles and other dangerous criminals, “abhorrent.”
ICEBlock can no longer be downloaded from Apple’s store, though people who already installed it can still use it. Aaron says the lawsuit aims to get the app reinstated and to deter similar takedowns in the future. “We will take it as far as it needs to go to ensure this never happens again,” Aaron said.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.