Wednesday, November 19, 2025

The Stock Market and Bitcoin Volatility, Explained.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Stocks and other investments like Bitcoin have seen significant volatility in recent days as fears over an artificial intelligence (AI) industry-fueled economic bubble mount.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nvidia, former Facebook executive Julie Zhou, the Bank of England, the AI industry, institutional investors, retail investors, and major stock indexes like the Dow Jones, the Nasdaq, and the S&P 500.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The fears of a bubble have been mounting for months, though Wednesday’s earnings report from Nvidia could prove a critical moment.

🎯IMPACT: The current loss in market index value is being driven primarily by institutional investors who have begun to fear that the AI sector and those tied to it are caught in an economic bubble with the potential to cause a 2008 or DotCom-style crash when it bursts.

IN FULL

Stocks and other investments, such as Bitcoin, have seen significant volatility in recent days as fears over an artificial intelligence (AI)- fueled economic bubble mount. However, this isn’t the full story behind the declining market returns, as a broader issue of asset inflation and a long-anticipated cryptocurrency correction also contribute to the market slide.

While the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 remain near all-time highs for the year, all three indexes have lost some ground since Monday, with the Dow losing over 400 points on Tuesday. The loss in value is being driven primarily by institutional investors—think major funds, banks, and billionaires—who have begun to fear that the AI sector and those tied to it are caught in an economic bubble with the potential to cause a 2008 or DotCom-style crash when it bursts.

THE NVIDIA PROBLEM.

The possibility of a bubble in the AI industry is a topic of hot debate. Notably, the primary concern centers on chip-maker Nvidia and its sales and market ecosystem. From a 30,000-foot view, it often appears as though Nvidia is essentially selling its products—by and large—to itself.

This fear over Nvidia and whether its meteoric rise and returns are real has underpinned some of the market chaos. The company will release its earnings report today after the market close, with the report itself expected between 4:20 PM and 4:30 PM. Executives will address shareholders at 5:00 PM.

Currently, there is little concrete evidence to suggest that Nvidia will miss its earnings expectations. However, the remote possibility and potential economic impact of Nvidia missing its earnings have spooked large swaths of the market. This is because Nvidia comprises somewhere between five percent and 10 percent of the S&P 500, and the AI industry overall comprises an even larger chunk of the index. A single stock index having so much exposure to one industry and one company has raised serious concerns about just what happens when that company and/or industry stumbles.

IS THERE AN AI BUBBLE?

Maybe.

The Bank of England has warned that an AI sector-fueled bubble is increasingly likely and could trigger a “sudden correction” in global financial markets. “The risk of a sharp market correction has increased,” said the Bank of England’s financial policy committee during a September meeting, warning that “equity market valuations appear stretched, particularly for technology companies focused on artificial intelligence.”

Additionally, former Facebook executive Julie Zhou believes that much of the AI industry’s growth is not being driven by robust data-driven business strategies, but rather by “good instincts and good vibes.” Zhou argues that while the AI industry holds tremendous promise, the technology is still far from achieving what many of its adherents claim. This has left the AI technology sector rife with speculative investment on a scale that could potentially threaten the U.S. economy should the bubble burst.

Adding to the concern are rumors that influential market figures, such as Dr. Michael Burry—famous for having shorted the housing market ahead of its 2008 collapse—have taken similar positions on Nvidia and the broader AI sector. Still, strong earnings from Nvidia and other companies tied to the AI industry would likely assuage investor fears and suggest that fears of a bubble may be overblown.

WHY IS BITCOIN SLIDING THEN? 

The fall of Bitcoin is a bit more complicated but still tied to the broader bubble fears currently among institutional investors. When market volatility increases, investors tend to flock to safe-haven investments—think Treasuries or very stable currencies like the Japanese yen. While many retail investors consider Bitcoin a safe haven, institutional investors view it as having too much exposure and a risk in a bubble situation.

Hence, the bubble fears are also impacting Bitcoin, along with other market correction forces. Some consider the cryptocurrency to be severely overvalued and thus a bubble in its own right. Conversely, JP Morgan has a price target of $170,000 on BTC within six to twelve months, leading some to “buy the dip” currently.

Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses. None of this should be considered financial advice.

show less
show more

Trump’s Midterm Performance Could Define a Populist Decade, or Cause Carnage the World Over…

The Western world is watching the second Trump term with as much attentiveness as American citizens. Why? Because they have almost as much ‘skin in the game.’

Next year doesn’t simply mark a decade since the MAGA movement forcefully took the global stage, but also a decade since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union, a decade since Italy’s globalist government collapsed, and a decade since Marine Le Pen broke through in national polling in France.

Austria’s Freedom Party ran the establishment close; Duterte won in the Philippines, the Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) became a significant fixture in domestic German politics for the first time, and Geert Wilders’s PVV began making its breakthrough.

All of this happened in the shadow of the 2015/16 mass migration crisis, which took some of its most heinous victims, harbingers of what was to come, in the form of the Cologne mass sex assault scandal that we first broke in the English language.

One can never do justice to the shock that pulsated across Europe and the United States that year. It was the defining moment in politics for over 1/6th of the global population, and it would have further knock-on effects in Russia, India, China, and the Middle East. Twenty-sixteen, ironically, was a global year. We can expect 2026 to be equally important, in a Newtonian sense.

What started in Europe a decade ago, in the small seaside towns of England, the suburbs of France and Germany, and indeed across the continent, swiftly made its way Stateside, and is now about to bounce back across the Atlantic.

The last two analyses from The National Pulse have focused on the inglorious disaster of November 4, 2025, and the impending catastrophe of November 3, 2026. If nothing is done, if no warnings are heeded, the failures of a Republican Party with gale force winds at their backs will certainly be felt and suffered by Europe’s populist-nationalists and indeed beyond.

Will Nigel Farage become Prime Minister? Will the Rassemblement National recover from the lawfare against Marine Le Pen? Will Hungary, though voting by April next year, choose stability in the form of Viktor Orban, or will the globalists and leftists form the kind of alliance they did in New York just ten days ago? The list of examples goes on.

“While there’s still a lot of time until the midterm elections in the US, there’s no question that a strong showing from the Republican Party and the MAGA movement would contribute momentum to Hungarian-American relations and Viktor Orbán’s party,” Rajmund Fekete, a historian and director of the Institute for the Research of Communism, told The National Pulse this week.

“The Biden era was not good for Hungary. The relationship really suffered. So many in Hungary are understandably rooting for the success of MAGA and Republicans next year.”

Colleagues across the old world echo his concerns.

“The midterms will matter almost as much to Brits as they do to Americans. The success of the second Trump administration will have knock-on effects in England just as Brexit did in America back in 2016. We’re watching closely and as always, rooting for the President,” said Andy Wigmore, an original ‘bad boy’ of Brexit, and top ally of Reform Party leader Nigel Farage.

French conservatives have similar sentiments, with Kate Pesey of The Tocqueville Fellowship telling me: “What I have heard in my travels is that the right in Europe is wondering if it’s already the comeback of the extreme left? Will what happened in NY happen elsewhere in the US? Are these the type of Democrats who are winning? Will it weaken Trump’s policies and his allies around the world? Meloni, Orban, etc. What is the plan to stop the damage done by these Islamo-gauchistes?”

Thierry Baudet, who leads the We are totally supportive of the Trump movement and are watching closely. This is a global attempt to recapture power from the international left, and Europe is directly affected by any wins or losses in America.”

The stakes, it appears, couldn’t be higher. And behind almost all closed doors, whether on Capitol Hill or anywhere in the developed world, politicos whisper about whether Trump’s economy will be roaring by the time Americans vote in under a year, or whether his administration has become too consumed by foreign affairs, scandals such as the Epstein saga, and indeed the recent government shutdown.

“It’s obvious that everyone — populist-nationalists and everyone else — will be watching these results closely, because the stakes are huge. The real question is whether this political program can show results that the public actually recognizes and supports. This movement is constantly attacked on its credibility and whether its ideas can even work, which is exactly why these results matter,” said Charlotte D’Ornellas, a firebrand conservative columnist in Paris.

The War Room’s Benjamin Harnwell equally opined: “The various populist-nationalist iterations around the world are certainly intrinsically linked. I see it as a worldwide convoy movement — rather than a unified battalion — a flotilla. An armada. An association of free-standing vessels that independently travel together.

“But the US is the convoy’s flagship — that’s precisely why what happens in America in 2026 is so important. I’d say it adds plus or minus 50 percent to what we’re doing here in Occupied Europe. A good result in America will give our movements a boost of 50 percent, whereas a bad result will probably give us a setback of 50 percent. It’s a headwinds/tailwinds thing.”

With so much on the line, populists, nationalists, and conservatives across the world appear increasingly concerned that a far-left Democrat victory next November will usher in a new dark age of extreme, authoritarian, Islam-allied populism from the far-left.

If Republicans lose badly next year, the final two Trump years will be punctuated by subpoenas, impeachments, and other deep state shenanigans that would leave so much of the world teetering on the brink of domination by America’s adversaries.

President Trump, many people are saying, must quickly return to his own populist roots and campaign pledges, rather than entertaining the Big Pharma or Big Bank bosses, and floating non-starter ideas like 50-year mortgages.

As goes America, so goes the world.

show less
The Western world is watching the second Trump term with as much attentiveness as American citizens. Why? Because they have almost as much 'skin in the game.' show more

Some Constructive Criticism.

Happy Veteran’s Day to my American friends. Happy Remembrance Day to my British and Commonwealth friends. Happy Constructive Criticism Day to my Trump administration friends! Most of you I hope will remember some of my concerns expressed about the economy a few weeks ago, both in this e-mail and in interviews. Those warnings appear to have…

Membership Required

Already a member? Log in here
show less
Happy Veteran's Day to my American friends. show more

A Brief History of Veterans Day—A Uniquely American Holiday.

While much of the world celebrates Remembrance Day, the people of the United States celebrate Veterans Day. The federal holiday, which began as Armistice Day—much like Remembrance Day holidays—originally commemorated the end of World War I on November 11, 1918. In the first commemoration of Armistice Day in 1919, then-President Woodrow Wilson declared, “To us in America the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled with solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country’s service, and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing from which it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given America to show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of nations.”

However, with the United States’ history being separated from much of the strife of Europe, the holiday evolved over the years into a day to honor living veterans of the country’s military. Meanwhile, Memorial Day—observed on the last Monday of May—is held as a day of honor and mourning for those who have died fighting for the United States. The evolution of the two federal holidays is a reflection of the uniqueness of the American experience and our history of conflict.

Memorial Day’s roots are in the U.S. Civil War, first instituted in 1868 as “Decoration Day” to remember fallen Union soldiers. As Memorial Day became established in the American tradition, it entered a sort of calendar conflict with the Anglosphere’s Remembrance Day nearly five decades later. For about a 50-year period, the United States marked both memorials.

The initial push to change Armistice Day began after World War II, when veterans pushed to have a national day of recognition. President Dwight D. Eisenhower embraced the idea, and urged Congress to take action.

In 1954—following the Korean War—the United States Congress moved to change Armistice Day to Veterans Day, a holiday that celebrates and honors those who have served the country in any armed conflict. Instead of just the American doughboys who crossed the Atlantic as part of the expeditionary force that provided much-needed relief to Western Europe in the waning years of World War I, Veterans Day became a day to encompass those who fought against the tyranny of Nazism in World War II, and against international communism in the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

Veterans Day now encompasses all who have served and—though no longer in arms and combat—still serve the nation.

show less
While much of the world celebrates Remembrance Day, the people of the United States celebrate Veterans Day. The federal holiday, which began as Armistice Day—much like Remembrance Day holidays—originally commemorated the end of World War I on November 11, 1918. In the first commemoration of Armistice Day in 1919, then-President Woodrow Wilson declared, "To us in America the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled with solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country's service, and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing from which it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given America to show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of nations." show more

EXC ANALYSIS: Last Night Was an Unmitigated, Self-Inflicted Disaster for the Right.

Tuesday night was an unmitigated disaster for the Republican Party, the conservative movement, MAGA, and America.

What made it so much worse is that the disaster was avoidable at multiple levels, and over the next few days, the vested interests will all point fingers at one another in an attempt to distract from their own failures. But we will be very honest and clear with you, even though people have urged us to bite our tongues: this was an institutional failure.

So let’s examine the institutions.

Who runs the RNC? That’s right, it’s Albania’s highest-paid consultant, Chris LaCivita. Who runs the White House? That’s right, it’s corporate America’s greatest ally, Susie Wiles. Don’t say we didn’t warn you of this.

How could two of the highest-paid political consultants and strategists IN THE ENTIRE WORLD not see the carnage of this election night coming? And how did they do so little to avert this wanton destruction?

Long-time followers of The National Pulse know we’ve been harping on about this since mid-way through the 2024 campaign. It hurts us in our hearts that we’re living through this. America finds itself at its wits’ end. We know you are, too. 

What makes this more difficult is that, at the same time, we all LOVE DONALD TRUMP and EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE FOR THIS COUNTRY and the free world. Yet in our heart of hearts, we also have to ask ourselves: who allowed these people to take the helm?

President Donald J. Trump needs to wake up now and toss these LOSERS out. Anything less is political malpractice.

That doesn’t mean we love Trump any less. It means we’re trying to have his and America’s back.

Please make no mistake about it: the electorates in New York, New Jersey, California, and Virginia are weapons-grade, suicidal nutjobs for voting for the candidates they’ve elected tonight. But here at The National Pulse, we are both optimists and realists in equal measure.

All of this was avoidable. And we are fuming.

Tuesday night was an absolute travesty and a disgrace. That we couldn’t beat the Islamists, the socialists, and the deep state!?

It’s time we stopped fawning at the feet of the consultants who demand our fealty because they managed to beat the WORST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY (Kamala).

We know some of you will question us for saying it. We don’t care. Some of us have lived through this in Europe. It’s why we’re here. It’s why we published NO GO ZONES and ENOCH WAS RIGHT. It’s why we’ve resisted every attempt from the left, from corporate America, and from foreign powers to BUY US OUT and SHUT US UP. Believe me, they’ve tried, over and over again. BUT WE BELIEVE IN AMERICA.

We believe in America First.

This is existential level stuff, folks. There can no longer be any sacred cows.

We genuinely could’ve won SOME if not ALL of these races. In fact, many of the influencers you might follow tried to convince you that we would win.

Did the candidates suck? Obviously. Winsome Sears? Dustbin of history. Ciaterelli? Dustin of history. Sliwa? Somewhat respectable due to his history of work in the city. But still, a wildly flawed pick, and a humiliatingly flawed campaign and strategy. 

We on the right are pissing up a rope right now.

And we couldn’t care less about the GOP and its apparatus. What we care about is how much WORSE people’s lives will now become as a result of this nonsense.

A golden age? Hell, we’re in the dark ages tonight.

And again, totally self inflicted.

show less
Tuesday night was an unmitigated disaster for the Republican Party, the conservative movement, MAGA, and America. show more

Arctic Frost: The Biden Govt’s ‘Watergate’ Level Lawfare Scandal, Explained.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Whistleblower revelations regarding the Biden-Harris era Federal Bureau of Investigation’s sweeping Arctic Frost investigation detail how the Biden Justice Department’s weaponized probe evolved from a public corruption unit into a sprawling partisan interference campaign.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former Attorney General Merrick Garland, former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Christopher Wray, Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith, former FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault, United States District Court for the District of Columbia judges James Boasberg and Beryl Howell, President Donald J. Trump, Republican lawmakers, over 430 Republican-aligned organizatsions and leaders, media companies, and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Arctic Frost probe began in April 2022, with Jack Smith taking over in November 2022 and expanding the investigation in 2023. Revelations regarding Arctic Frost’s unprecedented scope and weaponization were revealed in October 2025.

🎯IMPACT: While the full extent of Smith’s aims with Arctic Frost is likely only known to him and his investigatory team, the latest revelations certainly imply that the Biden DOJ’s special counsel intended to oversee a long-term partisan interference operation that would have—in terms of public scandal—dwarfed the Watergate break-in under the late President Richard Nixon.

IN FULL

In April 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) launched a sweeping investigation into an alleged false electors scheme following the 2020 presidential election. Code-named “Arctic Frost,” the investigation—under the guise of probing public corruption—quickly expanded, becoming the impetus for the former Biden Justice Department’s lawfare efforts against President Donald J. Trump. However, recent disclosures made by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) have revealed that Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith subsumed Arctic Frost’s investigative brief to launch an unprecedented partisan interference campaign against hundreds of Republican lawmakers, political leaders, political action committees (PACs), and activist groups.

IN THE BEGINNING

The FBI’s Arctic Frost investigation was quietly opened in the Spring of 2022, after receiving approval from former Attorney General Merrick Garland, former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and former FBI Director Christopher Wray. Initially, the investigation was meant to target an alleged false electors scheme in the name of combating public corruption.

FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault oversaw the investigation. Sen. Grassley contends that whistleblower statements indicate Thibault almost immediately sought to weaponize Arctic Frost, pushing its scope to target President Trump and other Republican lawmakers.

“Whistleblower disclosures to my office revealed how Thibault bent FBI rules and, in so doing, weaponized the federal government to take down a political opponent,” Grassley states, adding: “The Office of Special Counsel confirmed Thibault also broke the law; the Hatch Act prohibits political activity among federal employees while on duty.”

In August 2022, Thibault was forced to resign from the FBI over his handling of a separate probe into allegations Hunter Biden traded on access to his father, then-President Joe Biden. Thibault was accused of working to discredit allegations against Hunter instead of fulfilling investigatory duties.

ENTER JACK SMITH

Despite the departure of Thibault, the Arctic Frost investigation remained open, and in November 2022, it became a key vehicle for newly appointed Biden DOJ special counsel Jack Smith‘s January 6 investigation of President Trump. Under Smith—a notoriously over-aggressive and highly partisan prosecutor—Arctic Frost mutated into an investigatory tool aimed at connecting Trump and several Republican lawmakers to the January 6 Capitol riots, with the end goal being to secure convictions that would effectively bar Trump and his congressional allies from ever again holding office.

In early October of this year, Sen. Grassley released whistleblower evidence that Smith—under the auspices of Arctic Frost—tracked the private communications and phone records of at least twelve Republican Senators. The FBI subsequently confirmed the authenticity of the whistleblower documents.

The targets included Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Josh Hawley (R-MO), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), and Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA). An FBI special agent on Smith’s team conducted preliminary toll analysis on the lawmakers’ phone records, revealing call locations and numbers dialed. The calls were reportedly related to the certification of the 2020 election.

While allegations of the Biden DOJ spying on Republican lawmakers immediately raised serious ethical concerns regarding the scope and weaponization of Arctic Frost under Smith, another—more disturbing—shoe was about to drop.

THE BIDEN GOVERNMENT’S ‘WATERGATE’

Earlier this week, Sen. Grassley published a new tranche of whistleblower documents revealing the third life of the Arctic Frost probe. Beyond just President Trump and a number of Republican senators, Smith weaponized Arctic Frost to issue 197 subpoenas targeting Republican-aligned groups and individuals.  

According to the documents, by mid-2023, Smith—without any pushback from the Biden DOJ—sought records and communications involving over 430 individuals and organizations, including prominent conservative entities such as the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA). The investigation also involved a subpoena related to communications with media companies like CBS, Fox News, Newsmax, and Sinclair.

Notably, non-disclosure orders regarding Smith’s Arctic Frost targets were signed in 2023 by United States District Court for the District of Columbia judges James Boasberg and Beryl Howell. Both Boasberg and Howell have been at the center of recent judicial interference efforts against President Trump’s immigration enforcement actions and Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative.

Under the guise of investigating the alleged involvement of President Trump and several Republican lawmakers in January 6, Smith appears to have, in reality, laid the groundwork for an unprecedented, weaponized, and partisan criminal probe aimed at crippling the Republican Party. Financial institutions and political vendors for Trump-aligned PACs were targeted with subpoenas, suggesting that Smith sought to establish monetary links between hundreds of consulting firms, advisors, and nonprofits that he could subsequently prosecute—presumably under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act—if he had secured a conviction against Trump.

The aggressive scale and overreach are reminiscent of past prosecutions overseen by Smith. One of Smith’s most high-profile cases before he indicted President Trump was a corruption case against former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell (R), which ended with the DOJ declining to retry McDonnell after the Supreme Court threw out the conviction based on the trial court’s acceptance of Smith’s legal chicanery.

While the full extent of Smith’s aims is likely known only to him and his investigatory team, the latest revelations certainly imply that the Biden DOJ’s special counsel intended to oversee a long-term partisan interference operation that would have—in terms of public scandal—dwarfed the Watergate break-in under the late President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

The Stupidest Thing in American Health Care? Failing to Tackle Obesity Early.

It takes a very particular kind of political brainworm to look at a country where nearly half the population is obese, where Medicare and Medicaid hemorrhage cash treating diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancer — and say: let’s not pay for the medicine that actually fixes the root problem.

And yet, here we are.

GLP-1 medications, such as Zepbound and Wegovy, appear to be the first truly practical and measurable tools in the fight against obesity. And it’s a fight America has been losing for some time. It makes everything more complicated, including schooling, military and police recruitment, and, of course, it strains the healthcare system in the long term.

These aren’t fad diets or late-night infomercial garbage. They’re clinical, FDA-approved drugs with proven, repeatable results. They make people eat less. They make people lose weight. They make people healthier. The trial data, lived experiences, and economic modeling all back it up, now.

So why, in God’s name, are Medicare and Medicaid still banned from covering them?

The answer, naturally, is bureaucracy. Specifically, rules written in a different century, when “obesity” was treated like a cosmetic problem instead of what it actually is: a chronic, degenerative, society-wrecking disease. These regulations are so old that they might as well be written in typewriter ink or sent via fax. And they remain in place today, even as America’s health outcomes spiral and healthcare costs explode — not despite them, but because of them.

This is both a policy oversight and a moral failure. It’s also an utter financial farce.

Because when you don’t treat obesity at the source, you get to pay for everything that follows: heart disease, diabetes, kidney failure, amputations, strokes, early dementia, and cancers. You also get to pay for all the consequences of those conditions: hospital beds, nursing homes, permanent disability, and premature death.

Americans spend hundreds of billions of dollars every single year dealing with obesity and its aftermath.

A recent study found that covering GLP-1s under Medicare alone, without involvement from private insurance, would generate nearly $1 trillion in economic and social benefits over the next decade. It’s a Manhattan Project for public health, sitting right in front of us and still being ignored. And while America dithers, the consequences compound.

Patients desperate for help are turning to third-world compounders. Backroom operators cooking up unregulated versions of these drugs, often sourced from China or God knows where. The FDA itself has been warning people: these versions are riskier, less effective, and sometimes outright dangerous. But when your insurance doesn’t cover the legitimate option, what do you expect people to do?

And guess who’s hit hardest? Poor people. Working-class Americans who can’t afford the sticker price, or who cannot wait for the system to get its act together. The wealthy are getting thinner and healthier, and everyone else is getting sicker. This is not a populist healthcare model.

This is where the left also usually shrieks about inequality. And for once, they’d be right. However, it’s their regulatory regime that enforces the inequality.

A DPAC poll from earlier this year found nearly 70% of Republican voters and Trump supporters back Medicare and Medicaid coverage of GLP-1s. That is what we call consensus. That’s people using their eyes and their brains and saying, “Yeah, this makes sense.”

Because it does make sense.

Making America Healthy Again means using the tools we have. It means giving people choices.

Tackling obesity isn’t like elective Botox or some reality-TV lifestyle add-on. It’s a public health necessity.

It is infinitely cheaper, more intelligent, and humane to pay for weight loss up front than it is to bankroll the slow, brutal consequences of doing nothing.

America is a nation spending billions cleaning up after obesity, and zero on stopping it at the source.

That’s not just stupid. That’s sabotage.

President Trump and Congress, it is time for change.

show less

It takes a very particular kind of political brainworm to look at a country where nearly half the population is obese, where Medicare and Medicaid hemorrhage cash treating diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancer — and say: let’s not pay for the medicine that actually fixes the root problem.

show more

‘Back From the Ashes’ — Why Trump’s Revival of Columbus Day Matters.

For generations, Columbus Day stood as a proud national holiday, celebrating the Italian explorer’s daring voyage across the Atlantic, which set the stage for the later establishment of the North American colonies that birthed the United States. His legacy includes the District of Columbia, which hosts the nation’s capital, and the state capitals of Columbus, Ohio, and Columbia, South Carolina—but the man, and his holiday, faced a sustained, relentless assault from woke activists and academics over recent years.

Democrats enthusiastically encouraged and even participated in this assault, with Joe Biden proclaiming the rival Indigenous Peoples’ Day on his first year in office, following Democrat-led states such as California, Maine, and New Mexico. Sometimes, the tearing down of Columbus’s legacy has been literal rather than merely figurative, with at least 33 statues of the explorer pulled down by mobs or removed by craven local officials during the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020.

In many ways, the elevation of Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a de facto Anti-Columbus Day was the high point of the leftist culture of national self-loathing, smearing the United States as not just a country with a shameful, ugly history, but as a country that should not even exist. That’s why President Trump’s pledge to bring the holiday “back from the ashes” in April was so significant, and why the presidential proclamation that followed through on that pledge last week was so important.

The proclamation is unambiguous: Columbus is “the original American hero,” who “carried thousands of years of wisdom, philosophy, reason, and culture across the Atlantic into the Americas — paving the way for the ultimate triumph of Western civilization less than three centuries later on July 4, 1776.”

The anti-Columbus movement is denounced in no uncertain terms as a “vicious and merciless campaign to erase our history, slander our heroes, and attack our heritage.”

Politics, as the saying goes, is downstream from culture. The polluted waters of the old culture of self-loathing were producing a polluted politics in America, characterized by trampled borders and a loss of national confidence, national identity, and national cohesion.

The reclamation of Columbus Day is a standing rebuke to that era of decline, and you should make sure you celebrate it today.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
For generations, Columbus Day stood as a proud national holiday, celebrating the Italian explorer’s daring voyage across the Atlantic, which set the stage for the later establishment of the North American colonies that birthed the United States. His legacy includes the District of Columbia, which hosts the nation's capital, and the state capitals of Columbus, Ohio, and Columbia, South Carolina—but the man, and his holiday, faced a sustained, relentless assault from woke activists and academics over recent years. show more