• PODCAST
  • Breaking
  • SCOOPS
  • SWAG
  • TIPS
  • PRIVATE CHAT
The National Pulse.
  • PODCAST
  • Breaking
  • SCOOPS
  • SWAG
  • TIPS
  • PRIVATE CHAT
  • Analysis
  • Candidate

Top Three Reasons Cruz Is Right About Captain Kirk

  • July 24, 2015
  • Nick Arnold
Photo credit: Joshua Pinho
Photo credit: Joshua Pinho

In between dealing with mundane matters like religious liberty and Planned Parenthood’s alleged organ trafficking, presidential candidate Ted Cruz bravely waded into one of the most divisive debates in America today: Captain Kirk or Captain Picard? Cruz, an avid Trekkie, threw his unequivocal support behind Captain James Tiberius Kirk:

“Kirk is working class; Picard is an aristocrat. Kirk is a passionate fighter for justice; Picard is a cerebral philosopher,” Cruz explained. “The original Star Trek pressed for racial equality, which was one of its best characteristics, but it did so without sermonizing.”

I’ve had my disagreements with Cruz, but I have to agree with the Senator on this one.  Here are a few reasons James Kirk has the upper hand over his counterpart:

3. Kirk isn’t afraid to break the rules.

One thing no one can deny about Captain Kirk is that if he doesn’t like the way a scenario is working out for him, he’ll just change the rules.  This was evident from the very start of his career, when he was faced with an “unwinnable” combat simulation known as the Kobayashi Maru.  After failing three times, a frustrated Kirk reprogrammed the simulator to allow himself to pass, confirming later he doesn’t “believe” in unsolvable problems.  Cruz has also shown a remarkable similarity to this behavior since being elected: Don’t like activist judges?  Change the rules of the judiciary!  Congress won’t vote to defund Planned Parenthood?  Filibuster and hold up bills until they change their mind!  It doesn’t always work, but it certainly demonstrates the “critical thinking” that got Kirk full marks at the Academy.

2. Kirk was proactive; Picard, not so much.

Of the two captains, Picard was definitely the more cerebral.  He was a lot more likely to take a diplomatic course to any problem while Kirk was more inclined to go all in, dealing with problems when they came up.  There’s something to be said for both approaches in military tactics, but ultimately, if we put the two in government, Picard’s approach reminds me a lot of President Obama, while Kirk might actually get something done, albeit with a lot of bumps along the way.  Ultimately, I’m sympathetic to anyone who favors a Kirk approach to governing.

1. Kirk has blue collar appeal.

Cruz touched on this when he gave Kirk his endorsement, but I thought I’d expand on it a bit: Jean-Luc Picard was the son of vineyard owners in France, while James Kirk’s father was first officer on board a starship.  Again, there are advantages for Picard, like a more stable home life and (presumably) an excellent education, but when you’re asking which of them has a background that appeals more to the working man, it’s going to be the Iowa boy from a military family, hands down.

Nick Arnold is a researcher for American Principles in Action.

0
0
Your e-mail is required to confirm your vote. This is to stop spammers. If you use a fake email, your vote won't be counted.

Nick Arnold

Nick Arnold is a researcher for the American Principles Project.


You May Also Like
View Post

Day 79: How Many Border Czars *Aren’t* There Now?

  • Staff Writer
View Post

On Day 78 Biden Said: We’re Not Impinging On Your Rights, They’re Just Not Absolute.

  • Staff Writer
View Post

On Day 77, Joe Biden Admitted That Walls Work. Sort of.

  • Staff Writer
The National Pulse.
  • What Is The National Pulse?
  • Privacy Policy
Edited by Raheem Kassam

Designed and Implemented by Wahagen Khabayan

Input your search keywords and press Enter.