Saturday, March 14, 2026

DNA Shows Woman Pushed by Academics, Media as ‘First Black Briton’ Was Actually White.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: New DNA evidence reveals that the “Beachy Head Woman,” previously pushed by academics and media as the “first Black Briton,” was likely a local white woman from Eastbourne.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Researchers at the Natural History Museum in London, England, conducted the genetic study.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The skeleton was found in Eastbourne Town Hall in 2012; the study was completed recently.

💬KEY QUOTE: “By using state-of-the-art DNA techniques we were able to resolve the origins of this individual.” – Dr. William Marsh

🎯IMPACT: The findings challenge previous, politically driven narratives about “diversity” in ancient Britain.

IN FULL

New DNA analysis has revealed that the “Beachy Head Woman,” previously presented as the earliest known black Briton, was actually a white woman local to the Eastbourne area. Her skeleton, found in 2012 at Eastbourne Town Hall, had initially been linked to sub-Saharan Africa due to her cranial features, with academia and the media rushing to push this as evidence that Britain has always been ethnically diverse.

Advances in DNA technology have now enabled scientists at London’s Natural History Museum to perform a comprehensive genetic examination. The results indicate that her ancestry actually matches that of people living in Roman-era Britain far more closely than anyone from Africa.

“By using state-of-the-art DNA techniques we were able to resolve the origins of this individual,” said Dr. William Marsh, who co-led the museum’s genetic study.

The earlier assumption of African heritage had inspired facial reconstructions and stories about her life that are now under review. A plaque installed in 2016 asserting her African roots has been taken down in light of the updated evidence.

Previously, academics and media members attempted to push a narrative that the prehistoric Cheddar Man was black-skinned, only for researchers to quietly admit that testing could not prove his skin color, partly because the DNA had degraded over 10,000 years in Cheddar Gorge. Nevertheless, Cheddar Man was featured as a “black Briton” by the BBC in children’s programming intended to prove ethnic minorities have “been [in Britain]” from the start, alongside other historical figures such as Roman Emperor Septimus Severus—who was also not black, and not even from Britain.

Image via Face Lab at Liverpool John Moores University.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

British Medical Journal Publishes Article Defending Female Genital Mutilation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A group of 25 academics has argued that laws banning female genital mutilation (FGM) are harmful and perpetuate stigma towards migrant communities.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Scholars from the University of Cambridge, University of Bristol, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, and others contributed to the essay published in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The essay was published in the British Medical Journal‘s Journal of Medical Ethics; FGM has been outlawed in Britain since 1985.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The British Medical Journal has published a ‘puff piece’ promoting FGC, [s]aying it’s perfectly fine for the community (not the individual) to control her body.” – Stanford Visiting Associate Professor Alice Evans

🎯IMPACT: The essay has sparked fierce criticism, with experts warning it downplays the severe physical harm caused by FGM and undermines efforts to combat the practice.

IN FULL

A group of 25 academics from top British universities has drawn criticism for arguing that laws prohibiting female genital mutilation (FGM) fuel stigma against migrant communities. In an article appearing in the British Medical Journal‘s Journal of Medical Ethics, they assert that resistance to FGM draws on “sensationalist” narratives and “racialised stereotypes.”

The authors, including researchers from the University of Cambridge, University of Bristol, and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, maintain that Western anti-FGM laws “can objectify girls and women as passive victims” while alienating immigrant groups and widening societal rifts. They also suggest swapping the term FGM for “female genital practices” to “account for cultural complexity and avoid the reductive and stigmatising force of the term ‘mutilation’.”

“Despite the laudable ideal for journalists to look at all sides of any story, mainstream media coverage of female genital practices in Africa has been heavily reliant on sources from within a well-organised opposition movement… In North America, Australia, and European countries like the UK and Sweden, such coverage has frequently fallen short of journalistic standards of impartiality, often using stigmatising and denigrating language that fuels suspicion and surveillance of migrant communities,” the writers complain.

FGM—the partial or total removal of external female genitalia for non-medical reasons, sometimes referred to as female circumcision—has been illegal in Britain since 1985. Bodies like the United Nations (UN) view it as a human rights abuse due to the intense pain and long-term health risks involved. Still, the article compares FGM to simple labiaplasty, a cosmetic surgery popular in the West, and questions why male circumcision doesn’t face the same level of scrutiny.

Stanford Visiting Associate Professor Alice Evans denounced the article as an example of “academia digging its own grave,” writing on X (formerly Twitter), “The article blames Western media for causing harm by wanting to tackle FGC. No where does it mention that this is intended to reduce pleasure and maintain patriarchal control”.

The BMJ Group is standing by its decision to publish the academics’ defense of FGM, arguing that the Journal of Medical Ethics features provocative opinions and does not necessarily support the views expressed. Groups fighting FGM stress that it inflicts severe, permanent damage, typically on young girls without consent. Somalia has the world’s highest rate, affecting 98 percent of women.

Image by Amnon s (Amnon Shavit).

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

This Western Country Just Banned Headscarves for Schoolgirls Under 14.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14 years old has been passed in Austria.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The conservative-led coalition government, the opposition Freedom Party (FPÖ), and the Islamic Community in Austria (IGGÖ).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The law will take effect in September 2026, following a trial period beginning February 2026, in Austria’s public and private schools.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is not a measure against a religion. It is a measure to protect the freedom of girls in this country.” – Yannick Shetty, Neos party parliamentary leader.

🎯IMPACT: Critics argue the law is unconstitutional and discriminatory, while supporters claim it protects young girls.

IN FULL

Austria has approved new legislation that will prohibit girls under the age of 14 from wearing Islamic headscarves in both public and private schools, with full enforcement scheduled for September 2026. The conservative-led government says the ban covers “traditional Muslim” garments, including hijabs and burkas. A hijab generally refers to a headscarf that leaves the face visible, while a burka is a full-body covering with a mesh screen over the face, often associated with more stringent interpretations of modesty.

Supporters of the law argue that it promotes personal liberty for young girls who may face family or cultural pressure to dress in a particular way. Yannick Shetty of the liberal Neos party defended the measure, stating, “It is not a measure against a religion. It is a measure to protect the freedom of girls in this country.” Government estimates suggest roughly 12,000 children will be affected once the rules take effect. Officials say the law has been drafted to avoid the constitutional issues that sank a similar 2020 ban on headscarves for girls under 10, which the Constitutional Court overturned for targeting a specific religious group. A trial period focused on awareness-raising is set to begin in February 2026.

The Islamic Community in Austria (IGGÖ) has strongly criticized the legislation, arguing that it infringes on fundamental rights and will harm rather than help the children it claims to protect. In a statement, the organization warned, “Instead of empowering children, they will be stigmatised and marginalised,” and confirmed plans to challenge the law in court.

The populist Freedom Party (FPÖ), while voting in favor, argued the government’s approach is too limited. FPÖ spokesman Ricarda Berger said the party wants broader restrictions, insisting, “There needs to be a general ban on headscarves in schools; political Islam has no place here.”

Austria’s move comes as several European countries continue to debate or propose their own limitations on Islamic face coverings. In Italy, lawmakers have advanced proposals to ban burkas and niqabs in all public spaces as part of a larger initiative aimed at countering Islamic “separatism.” The Italian plan includes fines and additional oversight of religious funding.

Image by Soheil sargolzayi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Anti-Trump UK Deputy PM Replaced Queen’s Portrait with Pan-African Flags.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II was removed from the Foreign Office—equivalent to the U.S. State Department—by then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy and replaced with pan-African flags. Lammy is now Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor, and Justice Secretary.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: David Lammy and Britain’s governing Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Following the Labour Party’s election win in mid-2024, at the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office in London.

💬KEY QUOTE: The artwork was intended to be a “celebration of London’s immense ethnic wealth.” – Yinka Shonibare

🎯IMPACT: The removal of the portrait sparked discussions about cultural representation and changes in official government spaces.

IN FULL

Following the Labour Party’s election win in Britain in mid-2024, the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO)—equivalent to the U.S. State Department—under then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy took down a portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II and replaced it with pan-African flags. Lammy, who has described President Donald J. Trump as a “racist KKK and Nazi sympathizer” and the MAGA movement as a “cult of white supremacists,” now holds multiple senior positions as Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor, and Justice Secretary.

The 2014 portrait of the smiling Queen was moved into storage, leaving no images of the late monarch visible in the department. In its place, the office hung two works by British-Ghanaian artist Larry Achiampong: Pan African Flag For The Relic Travellers’ Alliance (Motion) and (Community). These pieces use the pan-African colours—green, yellow, and red—with 54 black stars symbolising the nations of Africa. Lammy, notably, is a black identitarian whose parents were Guyanese immigrants.

The (Community) artwork was later removed in late 2024, while (Motion) remains on display. The decision to remove the Queen’s portrait follows similar moves elsewhere in government, such as taking down a portrait of William Shakespeare at 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s official residence, and the removal of a portrait of Sir Winston Churchill by Chancellor (Treasury Secretary) Rachel Reeves at her adjoining official residence.

Image via the House of Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

State Department Restores Times New Roman Font to Reverse ‘Woke’ Policies.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinstated Times New Roman as the standard typeface for official communications, replacing Calibri, which was introduced under the former Biden regime.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Lucas de Groot, the designer of Calibri.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The change went into effect on Wednesday, December 10, across the U.S. State Department.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Serif typefaces remain the standard in courts, legislatures, and across federal agencies where the permanence and authority of the written record are paramount.” – State Department spokesman.

🎯IMPACT: The move is part of a broader effort to eliminate “wasteful” diversity measures and restore traditional standards in federal agencies.

IN FULL

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has directed the U.S. State Department to revert to Times New Roman as its official typeface, reversing the 2023 decision by former Secretary of State Antony Blinken to adopt Calibri. A cable sent to U.S. diplomats stated that the shift was intended “to restore decorum and professionalism to the Department’s written work products and abolish yet another wasteful DEIA program.” The decision aligns with the broader effort by the Trump administration to eliminate what it characterizes as “woke” and “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” initiatives across the federal government.

Calibri’s designer, Dutch typographer Lucas de Groot, expressed mixed reactions to the news. “The decision to abandon Calibri on the grounds of it being a so-called ‘wasteful diversity font’ is both hilarious and regrettable,” he said. De Groot noted that Calibri was created for legibility on digital displays and became Microsoft Office’s default font in 2007 because of its clarity at smaller sizes.

A State Department spokesman defended the return to the serif typeface, saying, “Serif typefaces remain the standard in courts, legislatures, and across federal agencies where the permanence and authority of the written record are paramount.” Times New Roman had been the Department’s standard from 2004 until Blinken’s transition to Calibri in 2023.

The move comes as the Trump administration accelerates a series of high-profile reversals of DEI-related policies. Earlier this year, the administration removed members of the advisory boards for the nation’s military service academies, arguing that the institutions had been steered by “woke” ideology and needed to be realigned with traditional military values. In another action, senior Pentagon officials imposed a deadline for transgender personnel to leave the armed forces, part of a broader rollback of woke military regulations. The administration has also sought to restrict federal agencies from using “woke AI,” issuing directives aimed at preventing contractors from deploying artificial intelligence systems perceived as ideologically influenced.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Police Add Quick-Release Hijab to Uniform to Preserve ‘Modesty’ of Muslim Officers.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A new hijab with a magnetic quick-release system designed for female Muslim police officers has been developed and put into production in Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Leicestershire Police, researchers at De Montfort University, and officers including Student Officer PC Seher Nas and Detective Sergeant Yassin Desai.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Developed over three years in collaboration with Leicestershire Police and De Montfort University in Britain.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Now, being [one of the first people] to actually wear it, I feel proud and empowered as a Muslim woman.” – PC Seher Nas

🎯IMPACT: The hijab design is being issued as part of personal protective equipment and has garnered interest from other police forces, National Health Service (NHS) trusts, and the private sector.

IN FULL

A new magnetic “quick-release” hijab has been specially engineered for Britain’s growing number of female Muslim police officers, allowing the garment to instantly detach if grabbed during arrests, so that it cannot be used to choke the wearer while still preserving “modesty.”

Developed over three years by De Montfort University in collaboration with Leicestershire Police, the design is now being rolled out as official protective equipment. Student officer PC Seher Nas said: “Now, being [one of the first people] to actually wear it, I feel proud and empowered as a Muslim woman.”

Project leader Detective Sergeant Yassin Desai, founder of the force’s Association of Muslim Police, noted: “The bottom part was able to detach and the officer was able to keep her dignity.”

Multiple police forces, National Health Service (NHS) trusts, ambulance services, and private firms have already inquired about adopting the garment. However, what is framed as a progressive accommodation quietly illustrates how far mass migration and state-sponsored multiculturalism have reshaped everyday British life: public institutions now find themselves redesigning standard uniforms and spending years of research to make Islamic religious attire compatible with the realities of modern street policing.

Image via Leicestershire Police.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Kennedy Center Honors Fundraising SKYROCKETS to $23M, Doubling Biden Era Figures.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Kennedy Center Honors raised a record $23 million for its 48th annual celebration, nearly doubling last year’s total.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Kennedy Center President Richard Grenell, Vice President of Public Relations Roma Daravi, and the 2025 honorees, including George Strait, KISS, Michael Crawford, Gloria Gaynor, and Sylvester Stallone.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The weekend of the 48th annual Kennedy Center Honors, with events including an Oval Office ceremony and a gala in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The record-breaking $23 million in contributions to the Kennedy Center Honors is a testament to the extraordinary support for our mission and affirms a vibrant future for this beloved American institution.” – Roma Daravi

🎯IMPACT: The event set a new fundraising record, introduced redesigned medallions, and marked a historic Oval Office ceremony under Trump’s leadership.

IN FULL

The Kennedy Center Honors raised a staggering $23 million during its 48th annual celebration, a record-breaking amount nearly doubling the $12.7 million raised last year, as initially reported by Fox News and confirmed by The National Pulse. This milestone comes as President Donald Trump begins his tenure as chairman of the Kennedy Center, marking a new chapter for the institution.

Kennedy Center President Richard Grenell highlighted the achievement, stating, “The center nearly doubled last year’s fundraising, reaching a historic $23 million,” and described the Honors as “one of our nation’s highest celebrations of the performing arts.” Roma Daravi, vice president of public relations, added that the contributions reflect “unprecedented donor enthusiasm.”

Trump hosted the first official, on-camera Oval Office ceremony recognizing the 2025 honorees this weekend. This year’s honorees include George Strait, KISS, Michael Crawford, Gloria Gaynor, and Sylvester Stallone.

Trump also unveiled redesigned medallions for the Honors, created in collaboration with Tiffany & Co.

The gala capped off a weekend of events celebrating decades of American cultural achievement, including a State Department reception and ongoing renovations to the Kennedy Center. Officials emphasized that these developments signal a vibrant future for the institution under Trump’s leadership.

Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.

show less
show more

Town Votes Against Expansion of Islamic Academy.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A zoning board in Hoover, Alabama, unanimously rejected a proposal to relocate a Muslim K-12 school after a heated meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission, local residents, and representatives of the Islamic Academy of Alabama.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting took place this week in Hoover, Alabama.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s not about religion. It’s about traffic.” – Jeff Wilson, the Hoover resident who initiated the petition opposing the relocation.

🎯IMPACT: The proposal now moves to the Hoover City Council for a final decision.

IN FULL

Residents of a city in Alabama packed a local zoning board meeting this week in opposition to a proposal to relocate an Islamic school to their town from a nearby municipality. The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 against rezoning property currently used for office space to accommodate the Islamic Academy of Alabama, currently located about 12 miles away in the city of Homewood.

Concerns about traffic congestion, adherence to long-term city development plans, and the precedent such a zoning change might set were cited as reasons for the decision. However, pressure from around 200 citizens attending the meeting likely had a significant impact on the zoning board’s decision.

A petition opposing the plan gathered over 1,700 signatures. “It’s not about religion,” said Jeff Wilson, a resident who initiated the petition, “It’s about traffic.” Meadowbrook resident Nancy Cooper also pointed out that six schools already serving more than 5,600 students feed traffic into Highway 119, often turning it into “a parking lot.”

However, some attendees expressed concerns beyond infrastructure. Signs warning of an Islamic “100-year plan” and comparisons to Muslim-dominated Dearborn, Michigan, were seen. One speaker said Muslims had implemented a “long-term cultural takeover” in Britain, drawing applause from some attendees. Commission Chairman Mike Wood interrupted, stating, “We are here to look at whether this school was appropriately placed. We’re not here for that. I’m sorry. We’re not going to listen to that.”

While Monday’s vote is advisory, the final decision now rests with the Hoover City Council, which will review the proposal in the coming weeks.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Biden Plans Rare Post-Presidency Speech to Accept LGBTQ Award.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Former President Joe Biden is set to receive the Chris Abele Impact Award and deliver a speech at the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute’s Leaders Conference.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Joe Biden, LGBTQ+ Victory Institute President Evan Low, and other notable figures, including Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey (D) and Maine Governor Janet Mills (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The event will take place on Friday in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “President Biden has shown unwavering commitment to ensuring LGBTQ+ people can participate fully and openly in our democracy,” said Evan Low.

🎯IMPACT: The recognition highlights the notionally Catholic Biden’s role in promoting the LGBTQ agenda, particularly transgenderism.

IN FULL

Former President Joe Biden will be honored with the Chris Abele Impact Award at the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute’s Leaders Conference in Washington, D.C., on Friday, where he is also scheduled to deliver a rare post-presidency speech. During his presidency, Biden named numerous homosexual, transgender, and supposedly “non-binary” individuals to key federal roles, such as nuclear official Sam Brinton, who was later arrested for stealing women’s clothing at airports.

Victory Institute President and CEO Evan Low praised Biden, who is notionally Catholic, for having shown “unwavering commitment to ensuring LGBTQ+ people can participate fully and openly in our democracy.” The organization’s board similarly credited him with “historic leadership on LGBTQ+ equality.”

Previous reporting on the Biden government’s spending priorities has noted that approximately $1.5 million was directed toward international LGBTQ-focused programs in 2024, despite Congress putting a pause on such expenditures. Critics argued the spending defied legislative oversight and reflected misplaced priorities amid financial strains at home.

Biden also issued a high-profile proclamation marking the Transgender Day of Visibility in 2024 on Easter Sunday, despite it being one of the most holy days of the Christian calendar, and hosted transgender activists who displayed their chests at the White House.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Wants to Reshape Hollywood By Reviving Classic ’80s and ’90s Movies.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump could soon push to reshape the entertainment industry, particularly focusing on reviving classic action and comedy films.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Oracle CTO and executive chairman Larry Ellison, film producer Dallas Sonnier, film director Brett Ratner, and Paramount Studios.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Ongoing discussions involving Paramount Studios and its potential future projects.

💬KEY QUOTE: “A wave of classically male-driven movies with mentally tough, traditional, courageous, confident heroes. Maybe even a tad cocky, but dedicated to honor and duty.” – Dallas Sonnier

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s influence could potentially lead to a resurgence of 1980s and 1990s-style action and comedy films.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump may be looking to reshape Hollywood and the American entertainment industry at large, using his relationship with Oracle co-founder and executive chairman Larry Ellison—who owns a significant stake in Paramount Global, which is controlled by his son David Ellison—to revive classic film franchises that dominated theaters in the late 1980s into the 1990s. Ellison, who has emerged in recent months as a significant promoter of Trump’s economic agenda, is believed to be central to the President’s entertainment industry ambitions.

Notably, it has been reported that President Trump is pushing, specifically, for the revival of the Rush Hour franchise, a series of buddy-cop comedy films starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, known for their urban comedy, action, and martial arts elements. Additionally, he has shown enthusiasm for films like the 1988 Jean-Claude Van Damme sports movie Bloodsport.

Hollywood film producer Dallas Sonnier is predicting that Trump’s influence over the entertainment industry could bring about “a wave of classically male-driven movies with mentally tough, traditional, courageous, confident heroes. Maybe even a tad cocky, but dedicated to honor and duty. Plus, of course, a few explosions, gun battles, helicopters, fistfights, and car chases!”

While Trump’s influence on the entertainment industry has been limited in the past, with occasional projects like Brett Ratner’s documentary on Melania Trump, the involvement of Ellison and Paramount presents a new opportunity for a revival of the American movie industry. In May, President Trump announced he was imposing a 100 percent tariff on all film productions located outside of the United States. The influential Teamsters Union swiftly backed the move.

“The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated,” Trump wrote on Truth Social at the time, adding: “WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more