A federal judge appointed by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris says the Commonwealth of Virginia cannot remove over 1,500 individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens from its voter roll. The lawsuit was brought by the Biden-Harris government.
U.S. election law bars those who are not American citizens from participating in federal elections. The issue of noncitizenvoters has become a major concern during the 2024 election as several states have found significant numbers of illegal registrations on their voter rolls.
VIRGINIA LAW SINCE 2006.
“Let’s be clear about what just happened: only eleven days before a Presidential election, a federal judge ordered Virginia to reinstate over 1,500 individuals—who self-identified themselves as noncitizens—back onto voters rolls,” said Governor Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) in a statement blasting the ruling. He continued: “Almost all of these individuals had previously presented immigration documents confirming their noncitizen status a fact recently verified by federal authorities.”
Addressing the legal requirements for Virginia to remove these illegal voters from the state’s rolls, Youngkin emphasized that the law has been on the state books since 2006 and has been fulfilled under both Republican and Democrat governments.
“This is a Virginia law passed in 2006, signed by then-Governor Tim Kaine, that mandates certain procedures to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls, with safeguards in place to affirm citizenship before removal—and the ultimate failsafe of same-day registration for U.S. citizens to cast a provisional ballot,” Youngkin stated, adding: “This law has been applied in every Presidential election by Republicans and Democrats since enacted 18 years ago.”
Youngkin says the state will immediately ask the federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for a stay of the decision.
Data shows that a statistically significant number of noncitizens have illegally participated in past elections. In Oregon, an alleged coding error resulted in over one thousand noncitizens being allowed on the voter rolls.
A federal judge appointed by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris says the Commonwealth of Virginia cannot remove over 1,500 individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens from its voter roll. The lawsuit was brought by the Biden-Harris government.
show more
Two Democratic-aligned groups have released a controversial advertisement depicting a fictional Republican legislator interrupting a man masturbating to pornography. The ad, titled “Republicans Rubbing You the Wrong Way,” is a joint effort by Progress Action Fund and Defend the Vote.
The ad portrays the fictitious Republican lawmaker taking a young man’s cellphone, which he was using to watch pornography in bed, and declaring a nationwide pornography ban. It is part of a $2.5 million campaign targeting swing states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Mirroring a similar television campaign regarding abortion and other cultural issues in 2022, the ad has sparked mixed reactions on social media platforms.
The 30-second commercial is scheduled to run on television, online, and streaming services across seven key states: North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Many social media users have reacted negatively. A critic on YouTube pondered the intended audience, while a user on X (formerly Twitter) described it as a desperate move by Democrats.
Some have also questioned the ad’s factual accuracy, as there is no current federal effort to ban pornography. However, some states have passed legal measures to ensure that only those of legal age can view pornographic websites—and that the performers in the videos are consenting adults over the age of 18 years old.
During the 2022 mid-term election, a similar ad was run by Progress Action Fund—though the issue of focus was birth control. In that ad, a fictitious Republican lawmaker stops a couple from having sexual intercourse with the use of a condom. While abortion and contraception access appear to have played a significant role in the midterms, both appear to have been overshadowed by concerns over the economy and illegal immigration among voters in 2024.
Ummm why are Republicans so disgusting?
They want to invade our bedrooms to tell us what to do and are trying to ban pornography (?!?).
Two Democratic-aligned groups have released a controversial advertisement depicting a fictional Republican legislator interrupting a man masturbating to pornography. The ad, titled "Republicans Rubbing You the Wrong Way," is a joint effort by Progress Action Fund and Defend the Vote.
show more
An influential group of Muslim leaders from Michigan have announced their support for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting his stance on global conflicts and immigration policies. The endorsement was declared during a rally on Saturday, where the leaders emphasized Trump’s commitment to peace and ending worldwide conflicts. Imam Belal Alzuhairi, speaking at the event, stated, “The bloodshed has to stop all over the world, and I think that this man can make it happen.”
The leaders also cited Trump’s immigration policies as a key factor in endorsing him. They underscored the importance of border security and the necessity of legal immigration pathways. Alzuhairi explained, “Anyone who wants to come to this country is welcome, but he has to do that through a legal pathway.”
Kamala Harris has lost the Democrats:
🔴 the unions 🔴 white men 🔴 the Washington post 🔴 the LA times 🔴 Muslims
The group conveyed optimism for Trump’s vision of America’s future, affirming that they aim to support “peace and justice for all.”
The endorsement was further highlighted by a spirited prediction from Alzuhairi: “Michiganders, I have two predictions for you for the next six months… number one, the Detroit Lions will win the Super Bowl… the second prediction is Donald J. Trump will be the 47th president of the United States of America.”
An influential group of Muslim leaders from Michigan have announced their support for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, highlighting his stance on global conflicts and immigration policies. The endorsement was declared during a rally on Saturday, where the leaders emphasized Trump's commitment to peace and ending worldwide conflicts. Imam Belal Alzuhairi, speaking at the event, stated, "The bloodshed has to stop all over the world, and I think that this man can make it happen."
show more
Arch-neoconservative and Washington Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan has resigned from the newspaper after it declined to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential race. Kagan, who writes a column for the Post, is married to the Biden-Harris government’s former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland—the globalist architect of the Ukraine war.
Kagan’s resignation follows The Washington Post’s announcement that it will not endorse Kamala Harris for president less than two weeks before Election Day. This is the first time the newspaper has declined to endorse a candidate since the 1988 presidential election. Publisher and CEO Will Lewis announced the decision to the newsroom on Friday.
The resignation of Kagan is not surprising, coming from a long line of neoconservative intelligentsia who are opposed to the more humble, noninterventionist foreign policy advocated by President Donald J. Trump. His late father, Donald Kagan, and brother, Fred Kagan, have both leveled their own criticisms of Trump over the years.
In addition to the familial ties to anti-Trump sentiments, Kagan’s wife—Victoria Nuland—is no fan of Trump either. A senior official in the Biden-Harris government, Nuland was the chief architect of the Biden-Harris policy on the Ukraine war. Infamously, Nuland has pushed for allowing Ukraine to expand the conflict by conducting military strikes deep inside Russia—a red line that Russia’s President Vladimir Putin says could elicit a nuclear response.
Having failed to sufficiently escalate the conflict in Eastern Europe, Nuland announced her resignation this past March. Just months later, her former boss, President Joe Biden, was forced into a ‘sort of’ resignation of his own following a disastrous debate against Trump. Consequently, the 81-year-old Democrat was replaced in July by Vice President Kamala Harris as the 2024 Democratic Party’s presidential nominee.
Arch-neoconservative and Washington Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan has resigned from the newspaper after it declined to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential race. Kagan, who writes a column for the Post, is married to the Biden-Harris government's former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland—the globalist architect of the Ukraine war.
show more
Election anxiety has hit a fever pitch among Washington, D.C. residents, and the German-owned corporate media outlet POLITICO wants its readers to know all about it. In an all-too-long column, senior editor Michael Schaffer details the planned flight of several residents from the nation’s capital for election night over fears of chaos and violence. Most of those interviewed apparently confuse Election Day with the riots that occurred on January 6 while Congress took up the certification of the 2020 presidential election.
One of the Washington, D.C. residents interviewed is Shreya Tulsiani, a researcher with Truth Initiative. “January 6th was a very scary time. I used to live right off of North Capitol Street, so I could see the Capitol. There were Proud Boys petting my dog that day. I don’t want to be a part of it,” she told POLITICO. How she knew the individuals petting her dog were Proud Boys and not another protest group or just random people walking by is unclear.
Tulsiani tells Schaffer that she believes November 5 could be just as dangerous as January 6 in Washington, D.C. She says, “I feel like election week might be crazy too. I don’t know what’s planned but I don’t want to be near it.” She goes on to insinuate the protective measures taken—including military checkpoints and the deployment of National Guard troops across the capitol ahead of Joe Biden’s 2021 presidential inauguration—were just as frightening as the Capitol riots.
“I know that the response here is, like, let’s bring out the tanks, let’s bring out the people with guns. That doesn’t make me feel safe either,” Tulsiani says.
D.C. Councilwoman Brooke Pinto claims she’s already getting questions from businesses in her ward—which includes the posh Georgetown neighborhood—as to whether they should board up in anticipation of unrest on election night. It should be noted that Georgetown is around five miles from the U.S. Capitol—and about two-and-a-half miles from the White House, where revelers usually gather for presidential elections—and the neighborhood lacks Metro subway access, making it difficult to reach for those without their own transportation.
Schaffer goes on to insinuate that any election night conflicts would have been unthinkable prior to January 6, 2021. However, the POLITICO editor is evidently and conveniently unaware of the actual violence and rampant property destruction that broke out across the country in the wake of President Donald J. Trump’s 2016 election victory.
However, at least one Washington, D.C. resident is skeptical of any political violence on election night—the city’s Democrat mayor, Muriel Bowser. “People have certain risk tolerances, and I don’t think they should be boarding up their businesses, but we’re not going to give them that advice,” she said earlier this week in response to the pear-clutching panic among capital residents.
show less
Election anxiety has hit a fever pitch among Washington, D.C. residents, and the German-owned corporate media outlet POLITICO wants its readers to know all about it. In an all-too-long column, senior editor Michael Schaffer details the planned flight of several residents from the nation's capital for election night over fears of chaos and violence. Most of those interviewed apparently confuse Election Day with the riots that occurred on January 6 while Congress took up the certification of the 2020 presidential election.
show more
President Donald J. Trump is floating the elimination of the federal income tax, with the revenue from it being replaced by income from import and export tariffs. The tax policy change, first floated by Trump during a recent campaign stop at a Bronx, New York barbershop, has caught fire on social media—even receiving the enthusiastic backing of former Congressman and libertarian firebrand Ron Paul (R-TX).
While the concept might sound farfetched on the modern political stage, it was not that long ago that the U.S. federal government was entirely—or almost entirely—funded through tariff revenue. Trump emphasized this fact during his Bronx stop. “It had all tariffs—it didn’t have an income tax,” Trump remarked at the Knockout Barbershop. He expressed concern about the financial burden income taxes impose on citizens, stating, “They’re paying tax, and they don’t have the money to pay the tax.”
TRUMP’S TARIFF PLAN.
On the campaign trail, Trump has strongly pushed for a more aggressive U.S. tariff policy. The 2024 Republican presidential nominee has proposed introducing a broad tariff regime on foreign imports ranging from 10 to 20 percent, with a significant 60 percent tariff on goods imported from China. The former Republican president has also said the U.S. should retaliate against any nation that tariffs American goods—even if those tariffs are 100 or 200 percent.
Several nations with strong diplomatic and economic ties to the United States still maintain high tariffs on American goods, especially automobiles. Both Germany and Japan have been able to tariff American car makers for almost 80 years because of the post-World War II Marshall Plan. Trump, however, proposes that this arrangement should change with either the countries dropping their high tariffs or the U.S. enacting their own on German and Japanese cars.
Today, tariffs only account for about two percent of federal revenue, while income taxes comprise about 94 percent of the government’s cash flow. While a ramp-up in tariff use could significantly change this dynamic, cuts to federal spending would still likely be needed. Currently, U.S. imports total approximately $3 trillion annually, while income and payroll taxes bring in $4.2 trillion.
THE TRUTH ABOUT TARIFFS.
Lastly, Democrats and some anti-Trump Republicans have tried to brand tariffs as inflationary. However, these attacks are highly misleading and, in some instances, outright falsehoods. Tariffs are, in simple terms, a form of consumption tax. Like most taxes, consumption taxes are deflationary in their economic effect. Properly understood inflation is either caused by increased demand driven by an expanding money supply or by the constriction of the supply of goods through policy or other means.
Tariffs neither increase the monetary supply nor prevent consumers from accessing goods; they are merely taxes importers pay on foreign goods. The most famous tariff legislation in U.S. history, the Smoot-Hawley Act, had a deflationary impact on the economy, not an inflationary one.
President Donald J. Trump is floating the elimination of the federal income tax, with the revenue from it being replaced by income from import and export tariffs. The tax policy change, first floated by Trump during a recent campaign stop at a Bronx, New York barbershop, has caught fire on social media—even receiving the enthusiastic backing of former Congressman and libertarian firebrand Ron Paul (R-TX).
show more
For the first time in 36 years, The Washington Post will not endorse a presidential candidate. Publisher and CEO Will Lewis announced the decision to the newsroom on Friday. “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” Lewis wrote to staff. He claimed there would not be any endorsements in “any future presidential election,” either, adding: “We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”
In a longer editorial on the newspaper’s website, Lewis explained the return to a past editorial policy where endorsements were not made, a stance consistent with its approach prior to 1976. That year marked a shift when the paper supported Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter following its pivotal coverage of the Watergate scandal. Until now, 1988 stood as the last instance the Post withheld an endorsement in a general election.
Tensions reportedly emerged when editorial page editor David Shipley disclosed the decision in a recent meeting of the newspaper’s editorial board. The reaction within the organization is said to have been predominantly negative, mirroring a similar situation that continues to unfold with the Los Angeles Times‘s decision earlier this week to pass on making a 2024 endorsement.
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who described it as a failure of nerve that undermines democratic values.
“This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty,” Baron wrote in a statement shared with NPR. “Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”
show less
For the first time in 36 years, The Washington Post will not endorse a presidential candidate. Publisher and CEO Will Lewis announced the decision to the newsroom on Friday. "The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election," Lewis wrote to staff. He claimed there would not be any endorsements in "any future presidential election," either, adding: "We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates."
show more
Bryan Lanza, senior adviser to the Donald Trumpcampaign, believes negative stories about the former president are set to emerge, telling CNN that “these fake things coming out” are part of a predictable election-time strategy by the Democrats. “You’re going to have something come out in the next couple of days, I suspect, and then something coming out next week,” he said.
One new allegation against former President Trump comes from Stacey Williams, a former swimsuit model who accuses Trump of groping her at Trump Tower in 1993—over 30 years ago—while Jeffrey Epstein was present. Britain’s far-left Guardian is still seeking to substantiate the claims, with only a vague reference to two friends of Williams who claim she told them about the supposed incident years ago so far.
On Monday, Williams recounted her experience during a Zoom call organized by Survivors for Kamala, a group supporting Vice President Kamala Harris—whose husband currently faces allegations of publicly slapping an ex-girlfriend at a film festival in 2012.
Responding to Williams’s allegations, Trump’s campaign press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, dismissed them as “unequivocally false,” saying they were fabricated by Harris’s campaign to undermine Trump.
Lanza says the accusations follow a pattern of fabricated allegations: “This is a long playbook that the Democratic Party has done and they try to come up with somebody at the last minute to try to distract from the fact that they have yet to make their case of why Kamala Harris would have to actually be president.”
Bryan Lanza, senior adviser to the Donald Trump campaign, believes negative stories about the former president are set to emerge, telling CNN that "these fake things coming out" are part of a predictable election-time strategy by the Democrats. "You're going to have something come out in the next couple of days, I suspect, and then something coming out next week," he said.
show more
With the 2024 presidential election set to be decided in less than two weeks, speculation regarding the potential cabinet picks for both major party candidates is rife. One of the important roles the election victor will choose is who will serve as the United States Attorney General.
While neither former President Donald J. Trump nor Vice President Kamala Harris has publicly stated who they prefer for the role, presidential transition documents and conversations among lawmakers on Capitol Hill have given some idea of who Trump is considering. Among the names being circulated are at least three sitting United States senators, a former acting Attorney General, a conservative legal expert, the former chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a U.S. District Court judge. Here they are, in no particular order:
SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM!?
One name that was floated even before the 2024 election cycle kicked off in earnest is U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC). While the pick would likely rankle conservatives and MAGA loyalists alike, Graham does have extensive legal experience and has been a close ally of Trump—even during the 2024 Republican primary.
Before his election to public office, Graham served in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps with the U.S. Air Force—eventually becoming the military service branch’s top prosecutor in Europe. After leaving active duty, Graham worked in private practice as an attorney for several years before being elected to the South Carolina State House of Representatives and, subsequently, the U.S. Congress.
From 2019 until 2021, Graham served as the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and is currently its ranking member. The South Carolina Republican—known for being a bipartisan lawmaker—made waves for his unusually vocal criticism of Democrats over their treatment of Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Graham would represent a wet and compromising approach to the Office of the Attorney General, representing almost no change from the public disaster that was Bill Barr. With Trump only being able to serve one more term, it would be a huge waste of time and indeed an unnecessary risk to appoint someone like Graham.
SENATOR JOSH HAWLEY.
Along with Sen. Graham, another member of the upper house of Congress said to be under consideration for Attorney General is Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO). Like Graham, the senior Senator from Missouri has extensive legal experience in private and government practices.
A graduate of Yale Law School, Hawley worked as a lawyer in private practice from 2008 to 2011 before joining the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty as an attorney. While at the Becket Fund, Hawley served on a legal team that won Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores—a Supreme Court decision that held privately-owned, for-profit companies were exempt from Obamacare’s contraception mandate.
In 2016, Hawley was elected as the Attorney General for the State of Missouri, where he served before defeating incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) in 2018. Sen. Hawley serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee and has developed a reputation as an aggressive and formidable interrogator of witnesses brought before the body.
SENATOR ERIC SCHMITT.
Joining Sen. Hawley as a contender for Attorney General is the junior Senator from Missouri, Eric Schmitt. The 49-year-old lawmaker succeeded Hawley as Attorney General for Missouri before being elected to the United States Senate in 2022. Also like Hawley, Schmitt has been an outspoken critic of the Biden-Harris DOJ and its partisan lawfare campaign against President Trump and his allies.
A conservative and populist politician, Schmitt checks a lot of the right boxes for an Attorney General nominee. Additionally, the junior Senator from Missouri has joined Trump on the campaign trail as a confidant, helping with the Republican nominee’s debate preparation ahead of Trump thrashing Joe Biden on CNN in June. Biden’s debate performance was so catastrophic he subsequently quit the presidential race.
As Missouri’s Attorney General, Schmitt worked to invalidate Obamacare. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he sued school districts and municipalities for overstepping their legal authority when implementing mask mandates.
FORMER ACTING AG JEFF CLARK.
One of the most interesting names being circulated is former acting U.S. Attorney General Jeff Clark. The former acting Attorney General in the final days of Trump’s first term in office, Clark has been one of the top targets of the Biden-Harris government’s lawfarecampaign against Trump and his allies.
Clark, a well-known and respected administrative lawyer, was appointed Assistant Attorney General during the Trump administration. During this time, he became concerned about potential voter fraud in the November 2020 election. He has drawn the ire of Democrats for simply authoring an unpublished legal memo on the constitutional actions Georgia state lawmakers could take to challenge the 2020 presidential election results due to allegations of voter fraud.
Two years ago, federal law enforcement agents acting on behalf of the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) raided Clark’s home—though the agency has yet to publicly state why the raid was conducted. Perhaps in anticipation of Clark’s possible appointment to Attorney General, Democrats have been pursuing an effort to strip the attorney from practicing law in the District of Columbia.
A documentary drawing attention to the dubious lawfare campaign against Clark was recently released to the public. Fearless Point of Attack: The Jeff Clark Story features numerous attorneys and others defending Clark, including law professor Robert Destro, who stated, “Jeff is being persecuted, I would argue, because he gave legal advice that he thought was good faith legal advice.”
MIKE DAVIS.
Conservative legal expert Mike Davis is another name that has begun floating around those close to the Trump campaign. Davis, the founder, and president of the Article III Project (A3P), previously served as Sen. Chuck Grassley‘s (R-IA) chief counsel for judicial nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Under Grassley’s chairmanship—and with the aid of Davis—the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmed a historic 85 federal judicial nominees put forward by then-President Trump to lifetime appointments. Among them were two United States Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch.
In addition to his work on judicial and legal matters, Davis heads the Internet Accountability Project (IAP), a nonprofit group aimed at holding Big Tech accountable for its partisan political bias and economic distortions. Davis has been an outspoken proponent of religious liberty, and his deep ties to those in the MAGA and America First movements make him a fan favorite.
On social media, Davis has routinely pointed out the hypocrisy and unprecedented lawfare campaign pushed by Democrats through hyperbolic quips about the actions he’d take as “Acting Attorney General.”
JUDGE AILEEN CANNON.
A somewhat surprising name has also emerged from a leaked document related to Trump’s presidential transition team. The document, titled “Transition Planning: Legal Principals,” lists U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon as a possible choice for Attorney General.
Cannon, nominated by Trump as a federal judge in 2020, gained attention after dismissing a case involving 40 criminal counts against the former president regarding his handling of classified documents post-presidency. Cannon found many issues with the lawfare prosecution, ultimately ruling that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional. Smith was neither appointed by the president nor confirmed by Congress.
The U.S. District Court judge appears second on the attorney general list, following former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton.
FORMER SEC CHAIRMAN JAY CLAYTON.
Jay Clayton, the former chairman of the SEC, is considered a top contender for Attorney General. With extensive experience in several fields of law as a partner with Sullivan & Cromwell, Clayton has an impressive resume—especially regarding legal representation in the U.S. financial sector.
Clayton was one of the first appointments announced by then-President-elect Donald Trump, being tapped for the role of SEC chairman on January 4, 2017. Interestingly, Clayton’s nomination was endorsed by future Trump antagonist, former Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. It was Vance’s office that colluded with Mark Pomerantz in its investigation of Trump regarding an alleged 2016 campaign finance violation and business record fraud.
The dubious case would later be prosecuted by Vance’s successor, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and is currently pending appeal. Some have speculated that Pomerantz pushed Bragg into the prosecution despite its legally questionable grounding.
Jack Montgomery contributed to this report.
show less
With the 2024 presidential election set to be decided in less than two weeks, speculation regarding the potential cabinet picks for both major party candidates is rife. One of the important roles the election victor will choose is who will serve as the United States Attorney General.
show more
Following President Donald J. Trump’s agreement to go on the Joe Rogan podcast, his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, is refusing to follow suit, according to her campaign spokesman Ian Sams. On Thursday, Sams stated, “We discussed the possibility with Rogan’s team, but due to current campaign scheduling, it won’t be feasible at this time.”
Reports earlier this month indicated that Harris’s campaign had been communicating with Rogan. His podcast, which had 14.5 million followers on Spotify and an even larger number of YouTube subscribers in March, appeals to a broad audience, including many young men—a demographic the Democratic nominee is struggling to appeal to.
President Trump is set to record an episode of The Joe Rogan Experience on Friday at Rogan’s Austin, Texas studio.
Rogan, who previously argued that foreign-born Americans should be able to run for the presidency and once advocated for a Star Trek-like communist utopia, has been critical of President Trump in the past, suggesting the president may be a “sociopath.” However, he admitted the former president was more mentally capable than Joe Biden, and he recently said that “Trump raising his fist and saying ‘fight!’ after getting shot is one of the most American f***ing things of all time.”
In recent weeks, President Trump has appeared on several major podcasts, including the Theo Von podcast and the Lex Fridman podcast.
Kamala Harris, meanwhile, has been on far fewer podcasts. On one, the sexually explicitCall Her Daddy, she justified not having any of her own children by saying she did not want to be “humble.”
show less
Following President Donald J. Trump's agreement to go on the Joe Rogan podcast, his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, is refusing to follow suit, according to her campaign spokesman Ian Sams. On Thursday, Sams stated, "We discussed the possibility with Rogan's team, but due to current campaign scheduling, it won't be feasible at this time."
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
