GET THE APP
Sunday, April 20, 2025

Category: Election 2024
November 20, 2024
Election 2024
Media

Poor Allan Lichtman Just Had His Messiah Complex SHATTERED.

During a recent segment on Piers Morgan Uncensored, a heated exchange occurred between historian Allan Lichtman and Cenk Uygur, host of leftist news show The Young Turks. The discussion grew tense when Uygur questioned Lichtman’s prediction regarding the 2024 presidential election, where Lichtman’s “13 Keys to the White House” model projected a win for Vice President Kamala Harris over Donald J. Trump.

Uygur challenged Lichtman, expressing disagreement with his theory and how it was applied to the election. Uygur asserted, “I told him his theories about the keys were absurd. I was right. He was wrong.” Clearly agitated by the accusation, Lichtman exclaimed, “No, you were not right, and I was not wrong!” and demanded respect for his professional contributions over decades, including the authorship of 15 books. Uygur responded, “Well, who won [the election], brother? … You live in a total world of denial.”

The argument escalated as Uygur continued his critique, describing Lichtman’s predictions as “preposterously and stupidly wrong. ” Lichtman raged that he was being “personally attacked.”

“I admitted he was wrong,” he shouted, despite having said he was “not wrong” moments previously. “I will not sit here and stand for personal attacks, for blasphemy against me,” he added.

“Blasphemy against you? Who the hell are you? Are you Jesus Christ, you loser?” Uyguy exploded.

The clip of the exchange attracted considerable commentary on X, formerly Twitter. Lichtman announced his departure from the platform shortly afterward.

WATCH:

show less
During a recent segment on Piers Morgan Uncensored, a heated exchange occurred between historian Allan Lichtman and Cenk Uygur, host of leftist news show The Young Turks. The discussion grew tense when Uygur questioned Lichtman's prediction regarding the 2024 presidential election, where Lichtman's "13 Keys to the White House" model projected a win for Vice President Kamala Harris over Donald J. Trump. show more
November 18, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Election Judge Charged with Felony for Accepting Unregistered Votes.

A Minnesota election judge faces criminal charges following allegations of allowing people not properly registered before the 2024 elections to vote. Timothy Michael Scouton, who operated as the head election judge for Badoura Township Precinct in Hubbard County, has been charged with two felonies: accepting votes from unregistered individuals and neglecting his duties as an election official.

An election auditor alerted authorities that at least 11 individuals were permitted to vote despite not completing the required registration forms intended to verify voter identity. Another judge working with Scouton on election night informed the police that Scouton instructed her to bypass the proper registration procedures.

Local officials, including the Minnesota Secretary of State, have expressed concern over the allegations. The Secretary of State’s office described the charges as “very serious,” emphasizing the importance of all election judges adhering to election laws.

Election fraud and voter integrity were a major issue during the 2024 presidential race, with states purging many ineligible voters leading up to the vote. North Carolina announced it purged over 747,000 ineligible voters in September, which included nearly 200,000 deceased people. Texas, likewise, stated they removed over a million voters from the state rolls, including illegal aliens.

However, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) issued guidelines for state and local officials that one former DOJ attorney said were tantamount to political intimidation. Gene Hamilton, a former attorney with the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, stated that the guidelines discourage officials from effectively ensuring that only eligible voters can participate in the election.

show less
A Minnesota election judge faces criminal charges following allegations of allowing people not properly registered before the 2024 elections to vote. Timothy Michael Scouton, who operated as the head election judge for Badoura Township Precinct in Hubbard County, has been charged with two felonies: accepting votes from unregistered individuals and neglecting his duties as an election official. show more
November 18, 2024
Corruption
Election 2024

Trump Is Right, Ann Selzer Should be Investigated.

President-elect Donald J. Trump has called for an investigation into Iowa pollster Ann Selzer, whose pre-election survey predicted a loss for him in Iowa, a state he actually won by a significant margin. The Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll, conducted by Selzer & Company, placed Vice President Kamala Harris three percentage points ahead of Trump in the Hawkeye State. After his decisive victory, 56 percent to 42.7 percent, he expressed distrust in the Selzer poll on his Truth Social platform, suggesting election fraud.

“A totally Fake poll that caused great distrust and uncertainty at a very critical time,” Trump said, alleging: “She knew exactly what she was doing.”

He continued: “Thank you to the GREAT PEOPLE OF IOWA for giving me such a record breaking vote, despite possible ELECTION FRAUD by Ann Selzer and the now discredited ‘newspaper’ for which she works. An investigation is fully called for!”

Ann Selzer, described as “the best pollster in politics” as recently as 2016, announced her retirement from the polling industry the Sunday following the election. However, she claims that her methodology in Iowa was consistent with previous successful predictions.

The pollster claims her Iowa survey was accurate, suggesting its publication increased conservative turnout. “I told more than one news outlet that the findings from this last poll could actually energize and activate Republican voters who thought they would likely coast to victory. Maybe that’s what happened,” she argued.

If Selzer’s poll was fraudulent, as Trump argues, it could have diverted key campaign resources in what was expected to be a close race, making an investigation into possible attempted election interference fully warranted.

Image by John Pemble.

show less
President-elect Donald J. Trump has called for an investigation into Iowa pollster Ann Selzer, whose pre-election survey predicted a loss for him in Iowa, a state he actually won by a significant margin. The Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll, conducted by Selzer & Company, placed Vice President Kamala Harris three percentage points ahead of Trump in the Hawkeye State. After his decisive victory, 56 percent to 42.7 percent, he expressed distrust in the Selzer poll on his Truth Social platform, suggesting election fraud. show more
November 18, 2024
William Upton
Breaking
Election 2024

BREAKING: PA Supreme Court Delivers Final Blow to Democrat ‘Recount’ Efforts.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has sided with the Republican National Committee (RNC) and U.S. Senator-elect Dave McCormick (R-PA), issuing a ruling that county election boards must comply with the high court’s prior rulings regarding mail-in ballot requirements. Incumbent Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA) attempted to challenge a prior high court ruling that disqualifies mail-in ballots that lack required signatures, postmarks, dates, and return addresses.

“The Court hereby ASSUMES its King’s Bench authority over the instant Application, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 502, only to DIRECT that all Respondents, including the Boards of Elections in Bucks County, Montgomery County, and Philadelphia County, SHALL COMPLY with the prior rulings of this Court in which we have clarified that mail-in and absentee ballots that fail to comply with the requirements of the Pennsylvania Election Code, see 25 P.S. §§ 3146.6(a), 3150.16(a), SHALL NOT BE COUNTED for purposes of the election held on November 5, 2024,” the judges ordered in their ruling.

Last Thursday, Bucks County, Pennsylvania Election Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia voted with a Democrat colleague to count the ballots that had been previously disqualified by the state Supreme Court. “I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” she argued at the time, continuing: “People violate laws any time they want. So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention. There’s nothing more important than counting votes.”

Meanwhile, with around 24,000 votes separating McCormick and Casey Jr., the Pennsylvania Department of State says the race will head to an automatic recount. There have only been a handful of successful state-wide recounts since 2000, and among those, only a few hundred votes separated the candidates.

show less
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has sided with the Republican National Committee (RNC) and U.S. Senator-elect Dave McCormick (R-PA), issuing a ruling that county election boards must comply with the high court's prior rulings regarding mail-in ballot requirements. Incumbent Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA) attempted to challenge a prior high court ruling that disqualifies mail-in ballots that lack required signatures, postmarks, dates, and return addresses. show more
November 18, 2024
Election 2024

Dem Election Deniers in Pennsylvania and Iowa Refuse to Concede.

Democrat candidates in Pennsylvania and Iowa are refusing to concede races they have clearly lost, instead opting to try to force costly recounts—and, in one instance, blatantly breaking the law in the hopes of titling the election results in their favor. Despite losing his re-election bid by around 24,000 votes, Senator Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA) is demanding the state engage in an expensive recount process even though past recounts suggest it is statistically improbable for him to make up enough votes to overcome Dave McCormick’s lead.

Meanwhile, in Iowa, Democrat Christina Bohannan is also attempting to force a recount against Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA). The latter won re-election by just under 1,000 votes. Since the infamous 2000 Florida recount, there have been an additional 36 stateside recounts of election results. Of those 36, only three were successful in changing the results. All three races were decided by a matter of just a few hundred votes, not thousands.

However, more concerning than the push for frivolous recounts is Democratic effort in Pennsylvania to count votes that the state’s Supreme Court has disqualified. In September, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court—whose majority is controlled by Democrats—ruled that mail-in ballots must include a proper date, signatures, and return address on to be valid.

Despite the ruling, in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, elections commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia is forcing her locality to count the disqualified ballots. The National Pulse previously reported that Ellis-Marseglia is citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision—which overturned Roe v. Wade—as the grounds for her decision: “I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” she said.

Pennsylvania Department of State guidance directs county election officials to keep the questioned ballots segregated from the official count until they can be reviewed.

show less
Democrat candidates in Pennsylvania and Iowa are refusing to concede races they have clearly lost, instead opting to try to force costly recounts—and, in one instance, blatantly breaking the law in the hopes of titling the election results in their favor. Despite losing his re-election bid by around 24,000 votes, Senator Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA) is demanding the state engage in an expensive recount process even though past recounts suggest it is statistically improbable for him to make up enough votes to overcome Dave McCormick's lead. show more
November 17, 2024
Corruption
Election 2024

‘Local’ Left-Wing Groups Funded by D.C. Dark Money Operation, Tax Forms Reveal.

An analysis of tax filings shows left-leaning groups significantly benefiting from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a Washington, D.C.-based dark money entity. The fund distributed over $18 million in 2023 to organizations aiming to sway elections in critical states.

Operating as local advocacy groups, recipients of these funds reportedly focused on election influence campaigns, digital messaging, and voter mobilization efforts. Key states receiving substantial investment included Alaska, Arizona, and Wisconsin, all of which hosted crucial elections on November 5. These elections involved both presidential pathways and congressional races pivotal to legislative control. Arizona was the primary target, receiving nearly $4 million. Advancing Arizona, a political group self-identified as a grassroots coalition, used this funding to oppose Republican policies and candidates.

The fund also directed attention towards New York, anticipating its potential impact on House control. Empire State Voices garnered about $3.5 million, which was utilized for aggressive ad campaigns against GOP Representatives Marc Molinaro and Anthony D’Esposito.

In Virginia, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, alongside other liberal financiers, contributed around $1.4 million to sustain Democratic power.

Despite reduced fundraising and spending compared to previous years, the Sixteen Thirty Fund’s role in financing Democratic-aligned super PACs and organizations remains significant. Controversy surrounds the fund’s backing, being linked to contributions from Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, raising concerns over compliance with federal laws on foreign donations.

“Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from contributing to PACs in the United States, [but] the Sixteen Thirty Fund contributes millions every year to Democrats-aligned PACs,” commented Capital Research Center analyst Parker Thayer.

show less
An analysis of tax filings shows left-leaning groups significantly benefiting from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a Washington, D.C.-based dark money entity. The fund distributed over $18 million in 2023 to organizations aiming to sway elections in critical states. show more
November 16, 2024
William Upton
Election 2024
Lawfare

Top Democrat Litigator: Cases Against Trump Should Be Dropped.

A top Democratic Party election lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as counsel to Vice President Al Gore during the 2000 presidential election recount in Florida argues that his colleagues should end the legal cases against President-elect Donald J. Trump. Thomas Goldstein, who now publishes the legal commentary website SCOTUSblog, echoes an argument made last week by former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, contending that the 2024 Election serves as its own verdict on the prosecutions.

“Democracy’s ultimate verdict on these prosecutions was rendered by voters on Election Day,” Goldstein writes in an essay for the New York Times. The long-time Democrat litigator continues: “The charges were front and center in the campaign. The president-elect made a central feature of his candidacy that the cases were political and calculated to stop him from being re-elected.”

He adds: “Despite the prosecutions, more than 75 million people, a majority of the popular vote counted so far, decided to send him back to the White House.”

DUBIOUS LEGAL THEORIES.

Goldstein contends that the two federal cases against Trump “are history” as Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith has indicated that he intends to resign from his constitutionally questionable appointment. Interestingly, Goldstein contends that the two state-level prosecutions against the President-elect in New York and Georgia “invoke legal strategies that had never been used to criminalize the behavior that prosecutors charge.” He notes both cases “…carry the stench of politics and, if pursued, could lay the groundwork for political prosecutions of future presidents.”

A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY. 

The SCOTUSblog publisher also agrees with Trump’s legal team’s contention that the “prosecutors’ legal theories were and are unusual” and that they “are fundamentally federal, not state, concerns.” Additionally, Goldstein argues that the continued pursuit of the charges would threaten the U.S. Constitution and American democracy.

“Inviting prosecutors of the opposing political party to pursue these kinds of charges in the wake of a presidential election can only make things worse,” he states.

show less
A top Democratic Party election lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as counsel to Vice President Al Gore during the 2000 presidential election recount in Florida argues that his colleagues should end the legal cases against President-elect Donald J. Trump. Thomas Goldstein, who now publishes the legal commentary website SCOTUSblog, echoes an argument made last week by former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, contending that the 2024 Election serves as its own verdict on the prosecutions. show more
November 15, 2024
Crime
Election 2024

Lesbian Lover of Trans ‘Woman’ Murdered Dad with Ice Pick in Election Night Freakout.

Corey Lizette Burke, 33, is in custody at King County Jail on first-degree murder charges. According to Seattle police, Burke admits to killing her father, Timothy Burke, at their home in south Seattle, Washington. Police reports state that officers found her at the scene, soaked in blood and expressing satisfaction over the slaying, which she described as an “act of liberation.”

Court documents say that on the evening of Election Day, November 5, Burke allegedly killed her 67-year-old father using an ice pick. Her actions included strangling, biting, and repeatedly striking him with the weapon. Burke, a lesbian program manager at Jeff Bezos‘s Blue Origin, is married to Samantha Leigh Allen, the transgender editor of the LGBT magazine Them.

Public records indicate that Burke cited distress over President-elect Donald J. Trump‘s projected victory over Vice President Kamala Harris as a factor in her actions. A disagreement with her father over turning off the lights reportedly escalated the confrontation.

Upon police arrival, Burke allegedly expressed happiness and was seen clapping inside the home, with blood visible on her face. She surrendered to the authorities without resistance. During an interrogation, she reportedly whispered a confession to an officer.

The court has set her bail at $2 million.

Image by Brandon Anderson.

show less
Corey Lizette Burke, 33, is in custody at King County Jail on first-degree murder charges. According to Seattle police, Burke admits to killing her father, Timothy Burke, at their home in south Seattle, Washington. Police reports state that officers found her at the scene, soaked in blood and expressing satisfaction over the slaying, which she described as an "act of liberation." show more
November 15, 2024
William Upton
Election 2024
Election Integrity

WATCH: Dems Admit to Breaking Law to STEAL PA Senate Race.

Democrats on the Bucks County, Pennsylvania election board are attempting to include the tabulation of mail-in ballots where voters failed to sign one of the necessary boxes. The five-to-two Democrat-controlled State Supreme Court ruled prior to the 2024 election that these types of ballots were not to be counted.

Despite the court ruling, the Bucks County Election Board is including the disqualified ballots in their county over the objection of its one Republican member. Led by Diane Ellis-Marseglia, the board appears intent on breaking the law to push incumbent Senator Bob Casey Jr. ahead of his Republican challenger Dave McCormick. Numerous media outlets have declared the latter the winner, and McCormick currently leads by over 25,000 votes.

“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” Ellis-Marseglia declared at Thursday’s board meeting, apparently referencing the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. She added: “People violate laws any time they want. So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention. There’s nothing more important than counting votes.”

The actions taken by Ellis-Marseglia and her fellow Democrats in Pennsylvania—possibly under the guidance of Democratic Party election lawyer Marc Elias—appear to be a flagrant attempt to undermine the law and U.S. election results. Notably, in Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia—among other states—President Donald J. Trump and his allies have faced prosecution over attempts to substitute slates of state electors. The latter is arguably legitimate and legal under the color of law, while Ellis-Marseglia and the Bucks County Election Board openly admit they are intentionally breaking the law.

WATCH:

show less
Democrats on the Bucks County, Pennsylvania election board are attempting to include the tabulation of mail-in ballots where voters failed to sign one of the necessary boxes. The five-to-two Democrat-controlled State Supreme Court ruled prior to the 2024 election that these types of ballots were not to be counted. show more
November 15, 2024
Election 2024
Media

Anti-Trump Editor of Historic Magazine Faces Reckoning.

Laura Helmuth has stepped down from her role as editor-in-chief of Scientific American. The magazine, recognized as the oldest continuously published periodical in the United States since its inception in 1845, announced her departure on Thursday. Helmuth’s exit follows a series of foul-mouthed posts she made online attacking supporters of President-elect Donald J. Trump.

The remarks on X alternative Bluesky, which were later deleted, included attacks on notable Trump allies, such as Vice President-elect J.D. Vance. “As a stepparent, stepchild, half-sib and half-aunt I just cannot WAIT for whoever Kamala Harris’s VP pick is,” she said following Vance’s selection as Trump’s running mate, adding: “Kick J.D. Vance’s bigoted, misogynistic, white supremacist carcass to the f***ing MOON.”

As Trump’s election win was unfolding, she posted, “I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of f***ing fascists,” adding: “Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f**k them to the moon and back.”

She also described the State of Indiana as “racist and sexist” and branded vaccine skeptics “f***ing ghouls.”

Helmuth apologized for her posts and described them as an inappropriate reaction to the election results, asserting that her comments did not represent the views of Scientific American or its staff. She claimed to be committed to impartiality and respectful dialogue in media.

Previously, Scientific American stirred controversy with its first presidential endorsement in 2020, supporting Joe Biden, and continued endorsement of Democratic candidates, including Kamala Harris, in September. In addition to this political activism, readers have questioned the magazine’s increasing focus on social issues like race and gender.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less
Laura Helmuth has stepped down from her role as editor-in-chief of Scientific American. The magazine, recognized as the oldest continuously published periodical in the United States since its inception in 1845, announced her departure on Thursday. Helmuth's exit follows a series of foul-mouthed posts she made online attacking supporters of President-elect Donald J. Trump. show more