A Dane County, Wisconsin judge has ruled that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.‘s name will stay on the state’s presidential ballot despite his request to be removed. Circuit Judge Stephen Ehlke stated Wisconsin law only permits presidential candidates to be removed if they die after submitting valid nomination papers.
Judge Ehlke emphasized the clear language of the statute, remarking, “The statute is plain on its face.”
“Mr. Kennedy has no one to blame but himself if he didn’t want to be on the ballot,” he added. With the deadline for printing ballots approaching this Wednesday, there is limited time for Kennedy to pursue further legal action.
Kennedy appealed to a state appellate court last week, ahead of Ehlke’s ruling. The Second District Court of Appeals is considering the case but was awaiting Judge Ehlke’s decision. Earlier in the month, the Wisconsin Elections Commission voted 5-1 to include Kennedy on the ballot, rejecting efforts by Republicans to remove him. #
Democrats were able to remove Joe Biden‘s name from the Wisconsin ballot earlier this summer, supposedly because he had yet to be certified as the party’s official nominee.
The presence of independent candidates in Wisconsin’s election could significantly impact the results. The state has experienced narrow margins in four of the past six presidential elections, ranging from 5,700 to about 23,000 votes.
Although Kennedy suspended his campaign in August and endorsed former President Donald J. Trump, he continues to seek removal from battleground state ballots, believing his presence increases Kamala Harris’s chances of winning.
Earlier this month, Kennedy succeeded in getting his name removed from North Carolina ballots through a court order.
A Dane County, Wisconsin judge has ruled that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s name will stay on the state's presidential ballot despite his request to be removed. Circuit Judge Stephen Ehlke stated Wisconsin law only permits presidential candidates to be removed if they die after submitting valid nomination papers.
show more
Suspicious packages were distributed to election officials in at least six states on Monday. The states targeted were Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee, Wyoming, and Oklahoma. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and U.S. Postal Service are currently conducting an investigation into the matter.
This incident marks the second time within a year that multiple states have received suspicious packages aimed at election officials, causing disruptions during a critical voting period. The scare comes as early voting is underway in key elections, including the presidential race and various congressional and statehouse seats.
Several states identified a white powder in the envelopes sent to their election offices. Tests on the material revealed it was mostly harmless substances. In Oklahoma’s case, officials confirmed the substance to be flour. However, Wyoming has not yet disclosed the composition of the material received.
The packages prompted an evacuation of the Lucas State Office Building in Des Moines, Iowa. Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate indicated that their emergency protocols were immediately implemented. “We immediately reported the incident per our protocols,” Pate said following the evacuation.
Similar evacuation procedures took place in Topeka, Kansas, where both the secretary of state’s and attorney general’s offices were targeted. Topeka Fire Department says field tests showed no hazardous materials.
Previous similar incidents occurred last November, affecting several states. Some of those letters contained fentanyl.
Suspicious packages were distributed to election officials in at least six states on Monday. The states targeted were Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee, Wyoming, and Oklahoma. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and U.S. Postal Service are currently conducting an investigation into the matter.
show more
Vice President Kamala Harris has won the endorsement of Scientific American magazine, which broke with its long tradition of avoiding political endorsements in 2020 when it first backed now-ousted President Joe Biden. Scientific American, as The National Pulse revealed in 2020, is owned by the controversial Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, or Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck, based in Stuttgart, Germany.
The multi-billion-euro conglomerate simply describes its early history as “track[ing] back to the book-club business,” adding: “In the 1930s, the company founder Georg von Holtzbrinck began with the sale of subscriptions to books and periodicals.”
But decades-old research revealed a much darker side to Holtzbrinck, the man and his company, who were eventually found to be willing fellow travelers of Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) Party, which Georg von Holtzbrinck first joined in 1931, two years before Hitler came to power.
NAZI COLLABORATOR.
Holtzbrinck, born in Schöplenberg in 1909, was just 22 years old when he joined the Bund Deutscher Arbeiterjugend, or Nazi-Jungarbeiter known interchangeably as the “Nazi Young Workers” or “League of German Worker Youth” in English. His joining of a college student group which appeared to have had run-ins with Jewish students and academics has led researchers to conclude his commitment to the groups was not “youth sins,” but rather, signified a willingness to collaborate with the Nazi Party and return receive millions for his propaganda work.
By 24, he was a fully-fledged member of Hitler’s movement and remained so for all 12 years of its existence, being formally subjected to denazification proceedings in the aftermath of the war.
The company enjoyed prosperity under the Nazi regime, per research conducted after Georg von Holtzbrinck’s death in 1983 and upon the firm’s rapid expansion into the United States. They published books for the army as well as a plethora of Nazi-approved magazines, including Freude der Arbeit (The Joy of Labor), Schonheit der Arbeit (The Beauty of Labor), Kolonie und Heimat (Colony and Homeland), and Berlin-Rom-Tokio, which was formally approved by Nazi Party’s Foreign Ministry.
COMING TO TERMS WITH HOLTZBRINCK.
In articles written in the late 1990s and early 2000s, outlets such as Vanity Fair, the New York Times, the Observer, and Forbes wrote scathingly about Holtzbrinck’s history and influence on U.S. publishing.
The Times itself has a murky history with Hitler, as revealed by The National Pulse in 2020.
German media, as well as an independent investigation into Holtzbrinck’s Nazi past, portrays the original publisher of the firm now responsible for Kamala Harris’s endorsement as someone who “cleverly took advantage of a favorable economic situation” of Nazi Germany, earning around one million dollars a year by 1942, in today’s money. The firm is now worth billions.
The “denazification” prosecutor accused Holtzbrinck of being “a convinced follower of the National Socialist authoritarian dictatorship,” and the publisher himself admitted he originally joined because “the people there made a lot of big promises that appealed to me.”
“As far as I can judge, von Holtzbrinck was a good Nazi and above all a profiteer who made a lot of money through sole management of various Nazi periodicals,” one witness testified during the proceedings.
And while Holtzbrinck himself appeared to have no direct line to Nazi leadership, the man he placed in charge of a postwar magazine was an infamous SS stormtrooper who had worked for Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Chancellor and Propaganda Minister.
But the history of the firm, which now has a footprint in over 100 countries, has been largely ignored for the past several decades, despite its ownership of some of the most revered publications and journals in the world, including Die Zeit (Germany), Palgrave Macmillan books (US), St. Martin’s Press (US), Nature (UK), Scientific American (US), and dozens more.
DAMAGE TO SCIENCE.
A more 21st-century critique of Scientific American actually emerged right before the millennium, when Commentary magazine writer Jeremy Bernstein lamented its sharp turn away from science and intellectual rigor at the hands of Holtzbrinck leadership.
“Now we have a magazine that disguises itself as Scientific American, just as the New Yorker disguises itself as the New Yorker,” Bernstein wrote, adding: “They wear some of the same clothes and hats, featuring the old typefaces and even a few of the old contributors. But in an almost desperate attempt to ‘sell,’ they have been dumbed down to the point where more and more they are becoming less and less. And to compound the folly, the strategy seems to be failing even on its own terms.”
A 2023 study into the politicization of magazines such as Scientific American, Nature, and the Lancet – all of which endorsed Joe Biden in 2020 – revealed a predictable decline in trust amongst Trump supporters, with researcher Floyd Jiuyun Zhang of Stanford University concluding: “The endorsement message caused large reductions in stated trust in Nature among Trump supporters. This distrust lowered the demand for COVID-related information provided by Nature, as evidenced by substantially reduced requests for Nature articles on vaccine efficacy when offered.
“The endorsement also reduced Trump supporters’ trust in scientists in general. The estimated effects on Biden supporters’ trust in Nature and scientists were positive, small and mostly statistically insignificant. I found little evidence that the endorsement changed views about Biden and Trump. These results suggest that political endorsement by scientific journals can undermine and polarize public confidence in the endorsing journals and the scientific community.”
The National Pulse reached out to the Holtzbrinck Publishing Group for more information about the company’s background and the lack of transparency on its website. At the time of publication, we had not heard back.
show less
Vice President Kamala Harris has won the endorsement of Scientific American magazine, which broke with its long tradition of avoiding political endorsements in 2020 when it first backed now-ousted President Joe Biden. Scientific American, as The National Pulse revealed in 2020, is owned by the controversial Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, or Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck, based in Stuttgart, Germany.
show more
The Mexican government has begun transporting migrants to the U.S. border. The “Emerging Safe Mobility Corridor” scheme, initiated by Mexico last month, is designed to help migrants gain parole into the U.S. under the Biden-Harris government.
The Mexican National Institute of Migration shared a video on social media showing the first bus transporting migrants from Tapachula, near Guatemala, to Reynosa, close to the U.S. border. The migrants are scheduled to attend appointments made via the CBP Oneapp.
#Video 🎥| Salida del primer autobús que trasladó de Tapachula, Chiapas a Reynosa, Tamaulipas a personas extranjeras que acudirán a su cita CBP One y que forma parte de la habilitación del Corredor Emergente de Movilidad Segura, que puso en marcha el gobierno mexicano a través de… pic.twitter.com/j1dBQSEGQo
Expanded under Biden-Harris, the CBP One app allows the government to process and parole up to 1,450 migrants per day at U.S. ports of entry. The app is also used to import up to 30,000 nationals a month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
Humanitarian parole is supposed to be limited in scope. Some conservative lawmakers and law officers believe Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are abusing them to facilitate mass migration. Statistics suggest that over 95 percent of migrants who schedule appointments through CBP One are granted entry.
A recent report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General criticized the app’s vetting processes. Migrant flights were briefly paused due to endemic sponsor fraud but have since resumed.
show less
The Mexican government has begun transporting migrants to the U.S. border. The "Emerging Safe Mobility Corridor" scheme, initiated by Mexico last month, is designed to help migrants gain parole into the U.S. under the Biden-Harris government.
show more
The number of foreign-born American residents is the highest it has been in the last century, as the Biden-Harris regime’s disastrous policies continue to allow illegals to flood the southern border. According to data from the American Community Survey, foreign-born residents now account for 14.3 percent of the total population of the United States as of 2023, the highest rate since 1910.
Last year, two-thirds of America’s population growth was down to migration. Migration accounts for three-quarters of the population growth over the previous ten years. The most significant portion of migrants come from Central and South America, with Latin Americans making up 51.2 percent of the migrant population in America in 2023.
The proportion of Hispanics overall in America also increased between 2022 and 2023, from 19.1 percent to 19.4 percent. The figures reveal the continued failure of the Biden-Harris regime to secure the U.S. border, which has seen as many as 12.5 million illegal crossings in a single fiscal year. The true number could be even higher, as U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) excludes the hundreds of thousands of migrants admitted through parole programs from Central and South America. These parole programs were briefly halted this year over allegations of corruption and fraud. Still, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has now resumed them, claiming it has boosted checks on potential fraud.
The Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan (CHNV) parole scheme has imported multiple criminals and suspected criminals, including a Haitian who came in as part of the program and was arrested for raping a 10-year-old boy last year.
show less
The number of foreign-born American residents is the highest it has been in the last century, as the Biden-Harris regime's disastrous policies continue to allow illegals to flood the southern border. According to data from the American Community Survey, foreign-born residents now account for 14.3 percent of the total population of the United States as of 2023, the highest rate since 1910.
show more
The overtly neo-Nazi Azov Brigade has issued a statement denying any links to Ryan Wesley Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump at the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Sunday. However, Azov admits Routh attended one of their events in Ukraine.
The group released a statement on X (formerly Twitter) admitting that Routh appeared in a 2022 video at a protest in support of Azov forces, who were fighting in the city of Mariupol at the time.
EXCLUSIVE: Attempted Trump assassin Ryan Routh appeared in a propaganda video for the AZOV BATTALLION in May 2022 pic.twitter.com/eugjHXHXqw
“We would like to officially state that Ryan Wesley Routh has no connection to Azov and has never had any connection to Azov. The peaceful demonstration he attended was open and anyone could join it. He was caught on the video filmed by the protesters by accident,” Azov writes.
They add that any suggestion that Routh has a connection to their brigade or the Ukrainian armed forces is “Russian propaganda.”
However, both Routh’s social media and mainstream media reports show he was trying to recruit foreign fighters for the Ukrainian armed forces, mainly focusing on Afghans fleeing the Taliban.
A truck parked outside Routh’s home has been pictured sporting a large Biden-Harris bumper sticker. He has also made at least 19 donations to the Democrats through ActBlue and posed for a picture with major Democratic donor José Andrés.
A video from 2022 of a rally in support of the Mariupol garrison in Kyiv, attended by the suspected Donald Trump assassination attempt, Ryan Wesley Routh, is circulating on social media.
We would like to officially state that Ryan Wesley Routh has no connection to Azov and has…
The overtly neo-Nazi Azov Brigade has issued a statement denying any links to Ryan Wesley Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump at the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Sunday. However, Azov admits Routh attended one of their events in Ukraine.
show more
State government officials in Oregon are acknowledging that at least 300 noncitizens have been able to register to vote in the state since 2021. The Oregon Department of Transportation claims the illegal voter registrations were the result of a “data entry issue.”
According to state officials, of the 306 noncitizens who registered to vote, at least two cast ballots in elections after 2021. Noncitizens are prohibited from voting in both Oregon state and federal elections.
Concerningly, Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Administrator Amy Joyce says she expects state investigators to uncover more illegal registrations and potentially more instances of noncitizens casting ballots in the coming weeks. Just under half of U.S. states have some form of automatic voter registration (AVR) when an individual files for or renews a driver’s license or submits paperwork with a state government agency.
AUTOMATIC REGISTRATION ISSUES.
Oregon passed its automatic voter registration law just over a decade ago. Considered a “back-end” AVR system, when an individual files paperwork with the state, that information is sent on to state election officials who determine whether the individual is legally allowed to vote and subsequently register those eligible. Proponents of the system claim it is secure and avoids potential fraudulent registrations. However, in Oregon’s case, a simple data entry error appears to pose a significant weakness in its security.
Addressing the issue, Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade said those believed to have been registered in error “will be notified by mail that they will not receive a ballot unless they demonstrate that they are eligible to vote.”
Automatic voter registration has resulted in significant problems with noncitizen voters in several states. The National Pulse has previously reported on instances of fraudulent noncitizen registrations in Illinois and Pennsylvania. Even in states without AVR policies, noncitizens have been able to register and illegally vote, as shown by a federal investigation in North Carolina.
show less
State government officials in Oregon are acknowledging that at least 300 noncitizens have been able to register to vote in the state since 2021. The Oregon Department of Transportation claims the illegal voter registrations were the result of a "data entry issue."
show more
A group of Democrat-aligned consulting firms is allegedly behind a shadowy political operation that has deceived numerous pro-Trump senior citizens and disabled individuals into running as third-party candidates in key Congressional swing districts in the hopes of splitting Republican support. Operating under the name Patriots Run Project, the group has ties to firms like the Nevada-based Sole Strategies, Common Sense America, and Patinkin Research—all associated with Democratic Party campaigns and candidates.
The Patriots Run Project has successfully recruited elderly and disabled supporters of former President Donald J. Trump to run in Congressional races in several states, including Iowa and Virginia. In other instances, the group failed to get their candidates on the ballot. Concerningly, the individuals recruited by the Patriots Run Project appear to be targeted mainly through social media and are almost entirely senior citizens, those suffering from long-term disabilities, or both. This suggests that the Democrat-run operation purposefully targets people they believe they can defraud and manipulate.
POSSIBLE ILLEGAL ACTIVITY.
While recruiting third-party candidates is not illegal if done in accordance with state and federal elections laws, the Patriots Run Project does not appear to be a registered business entity. Nor does the group have a nonprofit status with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Additionally, it is not a registered Political Action Committee (PAC) with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
The Democrat-backed organization provided paid signature gatherers for those they recruited to run for Congress. Additionally, operatives who appear to have used false names would pick up the candidates and drive them to local election offices to file their candidacy paperwork. In one instance, a candidate recruit noted that the operative attempted to dodge appearing on government security cameras and refused to have their picture taken.
It is unclear if the Patriots Run Project’s actions violate state and federal election laws, though the lack of business, nonprofit, or PAC registrations suggests this may be the case. An Associated Press (AP) investigation tied the group to several Democrat-aligned consulting firms based in Nevada and Washington State. However, national Democratic campaign committees deny any connection with the effort.
Sole Strategie’s clients include the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), Representative Pat Ryan (D-NY), and the Democratic-aligned Latino group Mi Familia Vota.
show less
A group of Democrat-aligned consulting firms is allegedly behind a shadowy political operation that has deceived numerous pro-Trump senior citizens and disabled individuals into running as third-party candidates in key Congressional swing districts in the hopes of splitting Republican support. Operating under the name Patriots Run Project, the group has ties to firms like the Nevada-based Sole Strategies, Common Sense America, and Patinkin Research—all associated with Democratic Party campaigns and candidates.
show more
New data suggests confidence in U.S. elections in waiting in six critical battleground states, with likely voters only expressing some degree of confidence their states adequately protect against fraud. In Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, nearly a third of voters say they lack confidence in state election results. Meanwhile, just two-thirds of voters express some degree of confidence in the process.
In Wisconsin, just over half of likely voters say they have confidence in the results reported by state officials. Meanwhile, in Michigan, the number drops to just 46 percent. Those who say they’re very confident fall to just four in ten in the other states surveyed. Notably, voters’ confidence in their state election process is highly correlated with their partisan affiliation—with Democrats being more likely to say elections are accurate.
Among Kamala Harris’s supporters in the surveyed states, 71 percent are very confident in voting accuracy, compared to just 15 percent of former President Donald J. Trump’s supporters. A significant portion of Trump supporters display minimal faith in the system. In Georgia, 61 percent of pro-Trump respondents are at least somewhat confident in election accuracy, whereas the figures drop to 50 percent in Nevada and are even lower in Pennsylvania (47 percent), Arizona (46 percent), and Michigan (44 percent).
The National Pulse reported in August that Georgia is implementing new rules to improve the security and accuracy of its vote-counting process. Additionally, Republicans on Capitol Hill are attempting to advance legislation that would ensure noncitizens cannot illegally vote in federal elections.
Democrat lawmakers almost universally oppose the measure.
show less
New data suggests confidence in U.S. elections in waiting in six critical battleground states, with likely voters only expressing some degree of confidence their states adequately protect against fraud. In Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, nearly a third of voters say they lack confidence in state election results. Meanwhile, just two-thirds of voters express some degree of confidence in the process.
show more
Taylor Swift’s recent endorsement of Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) appears to have had a mixed impact on voter preferences, according to new election data. A survey reveals just 8 percent of voters say they are “somewhat” or “much more likely” to support Harris due to Swift’s endorsement. Conversely, 20 percent of respondents are “somewhat” or “much less likely” to vote for Harris following the pop star’s declaration of support.
The majority of participants, accounting for 66 percent of responses, indicate that Swift’s endorsement does not alter their voting intentions. Following the September 10 presidential debate hosted by ABC News, Swift posted on Instagram to her 283 million followers that she is endorsing the 2024 Democratic Party’s presidential ticket of Harris and Walz.
Among the poll’s respondents, 32 percent believe Swift’s endorsement will positively impact Harris’s campaign, whereas 27 percent think it will have no effect. The survey noted that 41 percent of nearly 460 people surveyed feel Swift should refrain from making public political endorsements, against 38 percent who support her making endorsements.
Regarding fan demographics, 66 percent of the poll’s participants reported they are not Swifties, 28 percent identified as fans, and 6 percent described themselves as big fans. The majority of the last group are women and registered Democrats. Swift’s endorsement reportedly caused a spike in traffic to the voter registration site vote.gov, with 337,826 visitors clicking a link she shared on Instagram.
show less
Taylor Swift's recent endorsement of Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) appears to have had a mixed impact on voter preferences, according to new election data. A survey reveals just 8 percent of voters say they are "somewhat" or "much more likely" to support Harris due to Swift's endorsement. Conversely, 20 percent of respondents are "somewhat" or "much less likely" to vote for Harris following the pop star's declaration of support.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.