U.S. election officials again claim widespread delivery problems with the country’s mail system could cause election delays and disenfranchise voters. Similar claims were made by federal, state, and local election officials in the lead to the 2020 presidential election, though no significant delays occurred.
Claims of delayed mail processes that could impact the election have been used in the past—especially during the 2020 election—to obtain court orders or executive action to extend the early voting window or allow ballots received well after election day to be counted. Over the last several years, a series of court rulings found that many of these extensions and emergency changes in state election laws without the legislature’s approval were done unconstitutionally.
In a letter to U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, the officials claim issues they say happened during the recent primary elections were “not one-off mistakes or a problem with specific facilities. Instead, it demonstrates a pervasive lack of understanding and enforcement of USPS policies among its employees.” ‘
“We implore you to take immediate and tangible corrective action to address the ongoing performance issues with USPS election mail service,” the letter reads before adding: “Failure to do so will risk limiting voter participation and trust in the election process.”
The two organizations behind the letter are the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED). The former’s election committee comprises some of the country’s most partisan Secretaries of State, including Adrian Fontes. (D-AZ), Jena Griswold (D-CO), and anti-Trumper Brad Raffensperger (R-GA). Mary Vigil, a former Democrat aide in the New Mexico Attorney General’s office, serves as the current head of NASED.
show less
U.S. election officials again claim widespread delivery problems with the country's mail system could cause election delays and disenfranchise voters. Similar claims were made by federal, state, and local election officials in the lead to the 2020 presidential election, though no significant delays occurred.
show more
Former President Donald Trump has seen significant gains among independent and Latino voters in a recent NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, positioning him closely against Vice President Kamala Harris. The poll indicates a shift in voter support, with Trump now leading Harris by three points among independents in a multi-candidate contest, at 49 percent to Harris’s 46 percent. This reflects a 14-point gain since the previous poll in August, where Harris led by 11 points.
The poll also highlights a notable shift among Latino voters, with Trump now holding a four-point lead at 51 percent to Harris’s 47 percent. This represents a substantial change from August, when Harris led by 15 points.
These changes in polling numbers come after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exited the race and endorsed Trump. Additionally, the initial surge in support for Harris following her nomination appears to have stabilized.
The latest poll shows Harris leading Trump by a slim margin among registered voters, 49 percent to 48 percent. This is a slight change from August, where Harris led 48 percent to 45 percent in a multi-candidate scenario.
Key issues influencing voter decisions reveal varying support for both candidates. Harris is favored among voters who value honesty, while Trump is preferred for strong leadership. Harris also holds a 15-point lead among women, whereas Trump leads by 12 points among men. On specific issues, Trump scores higher on immigration and the economy, while Harris leads on abortion.
show less
Former President Donald Trump has seen significant gains among independent and Latino voters in a recent NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, positioning him closely against Vice President Kamala Harris. The poll indicates a shift in voter support, with Trump now leading Harris by three points among independents in a multi-candidate contest, at 49 percent to Harris’s 46 percent. This reflects a 14-point gain since the previous poll in August, where Harris led by 11 points.
show more
Kamala Harris’s running mate, Tim Walz, voted against legislation mandating lifesaving care for babies who survive abortions in Congress and repealed legislation requiring such survivors to be reported in Minnesota. The Nebraska-born Democrat initially voted in favor of H.R.4712, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, but wrote to then-Speaker Paul Ryan saying he had done so in error and requesting his vote be reversed.
On becoming Governor of Minnesota in 2019, he continued to pursue an anti-life agenda, repealing legislation mandating that reasonable measures be taken to “preserve the life and health” of children born alive after botched abortions. The omnibus bill containing the repeal measures also repealed requirements for abortionists to report cases in which infants survive abortion and whether those infants receive care, and the Positive Alternatives Act which provided support for mothers considering abortions.
Babies were recorded as having initially survived their abortions multiple times before Walz repealed the reporting requirements. Three were reported in 2019, although two were allowed to die, and the third received only “comfort care measures” rather than lifesaving treatment.
Some babies who survive their abortions have been saved by medical intervention. Melissa Ohden is one high-profile case, with a nurse finding her discarded in a bag of medical waste, making “weak cries and slight movements” following a botched abortion in Iowa in 1977.
In testimony to Congress, Ohden described how de facto “post-birth” abortions were the norm at the hospital where she was born, with it being common practice to “leave born alive infants like me to die in the utility closet.”
It’s true.
Tim Walz not only believes in abortion at all stages of a pregnancy, but even after birth.
Walz accidentally voted in favor of HR4712, which provided medical care to babies who survived abortion—but then REVERSED his vote.
Kamala Harris's running mate, Tim Walz, voted against legislation mandating lifesaving care for babies who survive abortions in Congress and repealed legislation requiring such survivors to be reported in Minnesota. The Nebraska-born Democrat initially voted in favor of H.R.4712, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, but wrote to then-Speaker Paul Ryan saying he had done so in error and requesting his vote be reversed.
show more
U.S. Census Bureau data shows the average American family was better off economically when former President Donald J. Trump was in the White House. The government agency data reveals that in 2019 the median household income was $81,210. Meanwhile, in 2023—under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris—household median income dropped to $80,610.
Additionally, while the data shows household income across most demographics recovering post-COVID-19 pandemic, this is not the case for Asian and Hispanic Americans. This may, in part, explain the accelerated shift of Hispanic and Latino voters away from the Democratic Party and towards former President Trump.
Under Trump’s White House, household incomes increased markedly for all racial and ethnic demographics until the pandemic.
BREAKING: New data from the U.S. Census Bureau confirms Americans were BETTER OFF under President Trump.
The National Pulse has previously reported that the inflation crisis kicked off by Biden andHarris’s reckless spending policies drastically increased the income level needed to maintain a satisfactory quality of life for a family of four in the U.S. An inability by the Federal Reserve to reign in the crisis resulted in interest rates remaining significantly elevated in the country for well over a year—restricting business access to capital and making loans, such as mortgages, prohibitively expensive for most Americans.
Even more concerning, the Biden-Harris government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics now admits nearly one million fewer jobs than initially reported were added to the U.S. economy over the past year. This news has raised concerns about a significant slowing in the labor market, prompting the Federal Reserve to consider cutting interest rates later this month despite not having inflation under control.
show less
U.S. Census Bureau data shows the average American family was better off economically when former President Donald J. Trump was in the White House. The government agency data reveals that in 2019 the median household income was $81,210. Meanwhile, in 2023—under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris—household median income dropped to $80,610.
show more
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes the debate between former President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris was largely a “score draw,” but the closing statements gave the America First leader the edge. In conversation with Harry Cole, political editor at The Sun, Kassam said Harris was “at least coherent” compared to Joe Biden, but “very smug and scripted,” especially in her closing remarks. Trump, on the other hand, came across as “indignant”—but “righteously indignant” about “the state of the nation, which a lot of those people in swing states are.”
On the issues, Kassam said the difference in rhetoric between Trump and Harris on Ukraine was striking. Trump, he observed, “talks about war in the sense of human life and human cost,” while Harris “talks about that war, and any war… in the sense of the propping up of an ideology.”
He recalled voters’ dissatisfaction with the cost of the “forever wars” in the Middle East and the way none of them seemed to end in America’s favor—particularly the withdrawal from Afghanistan, botched by the Biden-Harris government in 2021.
WATCH:
show less
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes the debate between former President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris was largely a "score draw," but the closing statements gave the America First leader the edge. In conversation with Harry Cole, political editor at The Sun, Kassam said Harris was "at least coherent" compared to Joe Biden, but "very smug and scripted," especially in her closing remarks. Trump, on the other hand, came across as "indignant"—but "righteously indignant" about "the state of the nation, which a lot of those people in swing states are."
show more
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claims 30 percent of Republicans refuse to support Democratic Party candidates because of their views on women, race, and LGBTQ issues. Speaking with podcast host Kara Swisher at the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival, the California Democrat insisted that these voters will never cast a ballot for Democrats, which is why the 2024 presidential race between former President Donald J. Trump and Kamala Harris is so close.
“There are people who will never be, shall we say, inclined to support Democrats because of – they just have a different orientation toward women, people of color, LGBTQ, you know, they just are not ever going to be there,” Pelosi told Swisher before continuing: ” So, say that’s about like 30 percent or something like that… of the Republicans.”
“And then you have very, very rich people who do not really want to pay taxes or have any regulation of clean air, clean water, any of that. So you have to deal with that,” the former Democrat Speaker noted regarding campaign fundraising, adding: “Now, it’s not as many very, very rich people, but it’s a lot of money that goes into a campaign.”
During the discussion, Pelosi seemed to suggest that Democrats should respect but still ignore the concerns of this large bloc of American voters. She told Swisher, “They have fear of globalization. They saw the factory down the road move overseas. They’re fearful of innovation.”
Addressing former President Trump directly, the 84-year-old Democrat who is running for re-election insisted he is a “snake oil salesman.”
Pelosi’s remarks are reminiscent of similar comments made by Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential election in which she labeled half of Trump’s political base as a “basket of deplorable” and cited similar perceived prejudices listed by the former Speaker.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claims 30 percent of Republicans refuse to support Democratic Party candidates because of their views on women, race, and LGBTQ issues. Speaking with podcast host Kara Swisher at the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival, the California Democrat insisted that these voters will never cast a ballot for Democrats, which is why the 2024 presidential race between former President Donald J. Trump and Kamala Harris is so close.
show more
Foreign media outlets are spinning hard for Kamala Harris following her debate against Donald Trump on Tuesday, feeding a narrative that she “got under his skin” and rubbishing his remarks about Haitian migrants killing pets in Ohio—an emphasis that could come back to haunt them if the allegations are substantiated. However, many conceded ABC News skewed the debate and that Harris did not outline a clear vision. There are also signs her pro-Israel remarks alienated Muslim voters key to winning swing states such as Michigan.
MOTHER COUNTRY.
Britain’s Telegraph, a notionally right-wing broadsheet, damned Harris with faint praise, with U.S. editor Tony Diver claiming she “made [Trump] look ridiculous” but “gave woolly and unclear answers on questions about the economy, and could not convincingly shrug off accusations from both Trump and the moderator that she has abandoned many of her beliefs in favour of the pursuit of power.”
Telegraph columnist Tim Stanley, who has long advocated for censoring Trump online, described the debate as a case of “he was crazy and she was insufferable,” giving a “narrow win” to the former president overall.
Telegraph readers gave Harris a slight edge, at 56 percent, but—like Stanley—suggested the ABC moderators tipped the scales in favor of the Vice President. “[T]he moderators were doing the debating for Harris,” said one.
The Daily Mail commissioned a poll of 800 independents, with 49 percent saying Harris won the debate against 43 percent who gave the nod to Trump. However, Harris only gained two points in terms of voting intention, rising from 36 percent to 38 percent. Trump also rose, from 44 percent to 45 percent.
‘SUPPORTING GENOCIDE.’
Qatar-owned Al Jazeera interviewed a number of “experts” post-debate. Predictably, none of the mostly left-leaning observers gave a clear advantage to Trump, but support for Harris was not effusive. Barbara Perry of the University of Virginia merely said, “At the very least, she didn’t put [undecided, moderate] voters off or make any disqualifying gaffes.”
However, in a sign of trouble for Harris in swing states, she received criticism for her stance on the Israel-Hamas war. “Vice President Harris has been pretty clear in previous statements, as she was tonight, that she will continue Biden’s policy of unconditional military and financial support for Israel’s war on Gaza,” said Reem Abuelhaj, of the No Ceasefire No Vote organization, referencing voters who feel “unable to cast their ballot for a candidate who is actively supporting genocide.”
Oh man they’re gonna pump Michigan with that clip of her saying she loves Israel 4eva https://t.co/QSEA78VLP1
SBS News, owned by the Australian state, said Harris won the debate—citing a CNN poll—and insisted, like many media outlets, that the Vice President got “under Trump’s skin.” However, the state media organ could not help but betray its clear bias, asserting Trump has “spent weeks insulting [Harris] with racist and sexist attacks.”
Sky News Australia, which leans right, stressed the bias of the ABC moderators. “I didn’t know whether I was watching Trump versus Kamala Harris or if I was watching Trump versus the ABC and Kamala Harris,” said one host. “Every single time they could, they gave her an assist.”
DO-OVER.
While many foreign media outlets claim the Harris camp expressing its willingness to do a second debate in October shows they are confident she won on Tuesday, Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes it shows they want a do-over.
Previously, ABC—which has a 100 percent positive spin score for Harris—was the only venue the Vice President’s team was willing to accept for a debate, with Fox News and even NBC rejected.
show less
Foreign media outlets are spinning hard for Kamala Harris following her debate against Donald Trump on Tuesday, feeding a narrative that she "got under his skin" and rubbishing his remarks about Haitian migrants killing pets in Ohio—an emphasis that could come back to haunt them if the allegations are substantiated. However, many conceded ABC News skewed the debate and that Harris did not outline a clear vision. There are also signs her pro-Israel remarks alienated Muslim voters key to winning swing states such as Michigan.
show more
Singer Taylor Swift publicly endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential bid on Tuesday night in a pre-written statement posted to her Instagram account and leaked early to the corporate media. The endorsement followed the debate with former President Donald Trump. Swift described Harris as a “steady-handed, gifted leader” in her post in which she referred to herself as a “childless cat lady” before locking the comments section down.
“I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them,” Swift wrote, praising Harris for her leadership qualities and commending Walz’s advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and mass abortion.
Swift continued, emphasizing the importance of voter registration and early voting, particularly addressing first-time voters.
At 34, Swift has become increasingly vocal about her political views, a shift that began with the release of her documentary “Miss Americana.” The film showcased her decision to speak out against Sen. Marsha Blackburn during the 2018 midterm elections. Blackburn won her Senate race in a humiliating failure for Swift.
Earlier on Tuesday, War Room host Stephen K. Bannon had issued a public warning about Swift’s impending endorsement of Harris, in a statement made from his jail cell at Danbury Prison in Connecticut. He remains a political prisoner of the Biden-Harris regime, and is due to be released on October 31 2024.
show less
Singer Taylor Swift publicly endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris's presidential bid on Tuesday night in a pre-written statement posted to her Instagram account and leaked early to the corporate media. The endorsement followed the debate with former President Donald Trump. Swift described Harris as a "steady-handed, gifted leader" in her post in which she referred to herself as a "childless cat lady" before locking the comments section down.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, called for decriminalizing prostitution in a February 2019 interview. Speaking with The Root—an online magazine geared towards African Americans—the then 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidate unequivocally endorsed ending criminal punishments for what the interviewer called “sex work.”
“Do you think that sex work ought to be decriminalized,” the interviewer asks Harris, who has spent much of her 2024 presidential campaign building up the image that she is a former tough-on-crime prosecutor. Harris responds: “I think so. I do.”
“When you’re talking about consenting adults, I think that you know, yes, we should really consider that we can’t criminalize consensual behavior as long as no one is being harmed,” Harris continues before adding: “But at the point that anyone’s being harmed or exploited, then I think we have to understand that’s a different matter.”
The California Democrat tacked hard to the political left during her short-lived 2020 presidential primary candidate, attempting to outflank the likes of Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders. After Harris was selected to replace the 81-year-old incumbent Joe Biden as the 2024 party nominee—following Biden’s exit from the race in July—the former California Attorney General has tried to distance herself from her prior progressive policy stances.
The National Pulse reported on Monday that Harris backed taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for illegal immigrants on an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) questionnaire she filled out during her 2020 camping. Harris’s disastrous 2020 primary campaign has proven to be a significant liability for her current bid for the White House. Former staffers who worked on Harris’s prior run have publicly denounced her, stating: “This person should not be president of the United States.”
Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic Party's presidential nominee, called for decriminalizing prostitution in a February 2019 interview. Speaking with The Root—an online magazine geared towards African Americans—the then 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidate unequivocally endorsed ending criminal punishments for what the interviewer called "sex work."
show more
Kamala Harris’s campaign has released a weird and homoerotic ad, primarily focused on former President Barack Obama and his thoughts about President Trump’s penis.
The video, distributed on YouTube on Tuesday morning, is called “Crowd Size” but features the 44th President of the United States from his Democratic National Convention (DNC) speech, fantasizing about President Trump’s genitals.
“Here’s a 78-year-old billionairewho has not stopped whining about his problems,” Obama states, adding: “Oh she had a big crowd all the crowd. This weird obsession with crowd sizes. It just goes on and on,” he says, while making hand gestures about penis sizes.
“This man is definitely gay,” Malik tweeted in 2023.
WATCH:
show less
Kamala Harris's campaign has released a weird and homoerotic ad, primarily focused on former President Barack Obama and his thoughts about President Trump's penis.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
