Monday, September 22, 2025

Biden-Harris ‘Deportation’ Program Let 90% Remain in USA.

A Biden-Harris regime program designed to swiftly remove migrant families who entered the US illegally is facing scrutiny after recent data revealed that nearly 90 percent of those enrolled have been allowed to stay.

Since its launch in May 2023, the Family Expedited Removal Program has processed 24,000 migrants, yet only 2,600 have been deported, leaving over 22,000 still in the country.

Additionally, more than 3,600 migrants have gone missing from the program and are unaccounted for.

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-TN) criticized the program, claiming it fails to effectively enforce immigration laws.

“These numbers show that the Biden-Harris [government] is not serious about securing the border or enforcing the law,” Green said. He accused President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of neglecting their duties and misleading the American public.

The program, which aimed to handle migrant families with children, involves placing an ankle monitor on one adult per family while processing their removal.

However, it includes loopholes allowing individuals to request a “fear-based” screening and, if denied, a further hearing with an immigration judge. This has led to many migrants remaining in the US despite the program’s intentions.

The program is just the latest immigration failure of the Biden-Harris regime, which has allowed millions of illegals into the United States since President Biden took office.

Harris, who was made Border Czar by Bidenrefused to reply to invitations from border states to visit key areas experiencing surges of illegal arrivals.

Several border officials have slammed Harris for her inaction on the border, with some noting the horrific crimes, including murder and rape, perpetrated by illegal aliens who entered during the Biden-Harris regime.

show less
A Biden-Harris regime program designed to swiftly remove migrant families who entered the US illegally is facing scrutiny after recent data revealed that nearly 90 percent of those enrolled have been allowed to stay. show more

Are Americans Worried About Illegals Voting? Here’s What the Data Says…

Americans are increasingly concerned about noncitizen voters illegally casting ballots in federal elections. New data from Rasmussen Reports indicates that 55 percent of American voters believe it is likely that noncitizens influence election results where they live. The polling data suggests that noncitizen voters are beginning to receive attention among the electorate after being dismissed by the corporate media for years.

The Rasmussen Reports poll also reveals an overwhelming number of American voters oppose allowing noncitizens to cast ballots in U.S. elections. A total of 85 percent of those polled said that only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Just 11 percent said noncitizens should be legally able to cast ballots. These trends were present regardless of political affiliation, with 87 percent of Republicans, 81 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of unaffiliated voters all saying that only American citizens should be legally allowed to vote.

IMPACT OF NONCITIZEN VOTES.

Corporate media outlets like the Associated Press have attempted to dismiss concerns about the election impacts noncitizen voters could make. However, evidence continues to mount, showing that noncitizens are not just voting but doing so in numbers that could prove pivotal in deciding the outcome of tight electoral contests.

The National Pulse has previously reported that election data shows a statistically significant number of noncitizens acknowledge participating in past U.S. elections. Additionally, the prosecution of noncitizen voters in North Carolina reveals that they illegally cast ballots by a ratio of three to one in favor of Democratic Party candidates. A federal investigation in the state found that some noncitizens were only allowed to register to vote by election workers after determining they’d likely support Democrats on the ballot.

Noncitizens have been able to cast ballots due to state governments granting driver’s licenses to legal and illegal immigrants. Additionally, the lack of proof of citizenship requirements in state and federal elections means that noncitizens can easily slip past the minor barriers intended to ensure only citizens cast votes.

show less
Americans are increasingly concerned about noncitizen voters illegally casting ballots in federal elections. New data from Rasmussen Reports indicates that 55 percent of American voters believe it is likely that noncitizens influence election results where they live. The polling data suggests that noncitizen voters are beginning to receive attention among the electorate after being dismissed by the corporate media for years. show more

FLASHBACK: The Kamala Immigration Pledge She Really Doesn’t Want People to See.

Kamala Harris pledged to shut down facilities holding illegal immigrants detained by federal agents on day one of her tenure in the White House while running in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary. The California Democrat’s remarks came in response to a question posed by a volunteer with the Center for Worker Justice Of Eastern Iowa—a far-left group that advocates for illegal immigrant workers, among others.

“I want to know, when you become president, would you be committing to close immigration detention centers?” the far-left volunteer asked. Harris quickly responded: “Absolutely, on day one. On day one.”

Since entering government as vice president in 2021, Harris was tapped as Joe Biden‘s border czar—overseeing border security and the causes of mass illegal immigration from Latin America. Under Harris’ watch, illegal immigration has reached crisis levels, and the federal government has taken little action to curtail the flow of border crossings.

The National Pulse reported last month that Harris has previously compared U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and called former President Donald J. Trump‘s wall on the southern border a “vanity project.” In addition, the 2024 Democratic Party’s vice presidential nominee, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), likened ICE actions against illegal immigration in Minnesota to “terrorism” during a campaign event in 2019.

Under the Biden-Harris government, upwards of 20 million illegal immigrants may have entered the country in three-and-a-half years. Compounding the crisis, Biden and Harris have hamstrung deportation efforts, with ICE’s non-detained docket having doubled from its number under former President Trump.

WATCH: 

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less
Kamala Harris pledged to shut down facilities holding illegal immigrants detained by federal agents on day one of her tenure in the White House while running in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary. The California Democrat's remarks came in response to a question posed by a volunteer with the Center for Worker Justice Of Eastern Iowa—a far-left group that advocates for illegal immigrant workers, among others. show more

NYT Makes Stunning Election Admission Over Biden-Harris Migration Policy.

The Joe BidenKamala Harris government is handing U.S. citizenship to migrants at the fastest rate in a decade. Thousands of foreigners are becoming U.S. citizens each week, with The New York Times stressing these foreign-born citizens “are looking forward to voting in November.”

Xiao Wang, the foreign-born chief executive of the Boundless Immigration organization, told the NYT the “surge in naturalization efficiency isn’t just about clearing backlogs; it’s potentially reshaping the electorate, merely months before a pivotal election.”

Wang, whose organization helps migrants to naturalize, employing former State Department Deputy Visa Chief and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Immigration Services Officer Erik Finch to do so, brags, “Every citizenship application could be a vote that decides Senate seats or even the presidency.”

Roughly 3.3 million foreigners have been naturalized under the Biden-Harris government so far. States with high numbers of voting-age naturalized citizens, such as Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and Pennsylvania, are essential for candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in their electoral strategies.

The NYT quotes naturalized migrants who say they were processed in less than six months, while the Trump administration took around ten months due to “heightened scrutiny” of applicants and pandemic-related delays.

SWINGING THE ELECTION.

A recent survey indicates some 81.4 percent of naturalized migrants will “definitely” vote in the 2024 election, and another 14.5 percent “probably” will. Naturalized Latino, African, and Asian migrants all skew Democratic.

Even non-naturalized immigrants, legal and illegal, could have an impact on the election, with poor vetting meaning many are registering to vote despite not being eligible to do so.

Considering only illegal immigration, most Americans believe Biden and Harris have allowed it to grow out of control in the belief it will create a “permanent majority” for the Democratic Party over time. Projections suggest that, by the end of its term, the Biden-Harris government will have seen illegal immigration equivalent to all legal immigration through Ellis Island from 1892 to 1954.

Image by Adam Schultz.

show less
The Joe Biden-Kamala Harris government is handing U.S. citizenship to migrants at the fastest rate in a decade. Thousands of foreigners are becoming U.S. citizens each week, with The New York Times stressing these foreign-born citizens "are looking forward to voting in November." show more

REVEALED: Top NeverTrump PAC Spends Just 3% of Donations on Legitimate Output.

The Lincoln Project—an anti-Trump PAC—is again reporting stunning overhead costs compared to actual election spending. U.S. federal election records show the group, accused of being a scam PAC, has spent $11.7 million on overhead and just $437,000 on actual election spending since January 1, 2023.

High overhead spending with little actual money flowing into election activities isn’t an aberration for The Lincoln Project. The National Pulse reported the group engaged in a similar spending pattern—pouring donor money into vendors, media buyers, and consulting firms connected to the PAC’s founders—during the 2020 election. A total of around $10 million was funneled through vendors back into the pockets of The Lincoln Project‘s founders during the last presidential election cycle.

Founded in 2019 by a group of ‘Republican’ consultants who had been frozen out of work in the party because of their opposition to then-President Donald J. Trump, The Lincoln Project has consistently spent unusually high amounts of donor dollars on overhead costs compared to actual electioneering. Even more troubling, The Lincoln Project was embroiled in controversy in early 2021 after it was revealed that one of its co-founders, John Weaver, was shown to have sent inappropriate messages to young men and boys in an attempt to sexually groom them.

The National Pulse reported this past April that The Lincoln Project paid out $35,000 to hackers who had posed as vendors for the PAC and sent fraudulent invoices.

In addition, the group poured $42,000 into the far-left, anti-Trump MeidasTouch organization. MeidasTouch, a former Democrat PAC, now serves as a Democrat media platform. It hosts the likes of serial perjurer Michael Cohen and pushed the infamous “bloodbath” hoax against former President Trump.

show less
The Lincoln Project—an anti-Trump PAC—is again reporting stunning overhead costs compared to actual election spending. U.S. federal election records show the group, accused of being a scam PAC, has spent $11.7 million on overhead and just $437,000 on actual election spending since January 1, 2023. show more

Trump Campaign Office Burglarized, Suspect at Large.

Law enforcement is investigating the burglarization of one of former President Donald J. Trump‘s campaign offices in Virginia. The incident occurred on Sunday around 9 PM at an office located in Ashburn, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office confirmed on Monday.

Video surveillance footage shows the suspect is a white adult male in dark clothes and a dark baseball cap, carrying a backpack.

“It is rare to have the office of any political campaign or party broken into,” said Sheriff Mike Chapman. “We are determined to identify the suspect, investigate why it happened, and determine what may have been taken as well as what may have been left behind.”

The event has drawn comparisons to the Watergate scandal, when a break-in at the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters during President Richard Nixon’s re-election caused political turmoil. The Trump campaign office, about 30 miles west of Washington, D.C., also functions as the headquarters for the Virginia 10th District Republican Committee. In addition, it is used as an office by Mike Clancy, a Republican candidate, who is currently campaigning against Democrat Suhas Subramanyam for the congressional seat held by the outgoing Rep. Jennifer Wexton.

News of the break-in comes amid warnings that suspected Iranian hackers have targeted the Trump campaign, which the FBI is now investigating.

This was followed on Monday by a coordinated attempt to derail a conversation between Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk on X (formerly Twitter) with a massive distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, cheered on by Kamala Harris‘s election campaign.

This story is developing…

show less
Law enforcement is investigating the burglarization of one of former President Donald J. Trump's campaign offices in Virginia. The incident occurred on Sunday around 9 PM at an office located in Ashburn, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office confirmed on Monday. show more

Kamala Campaign Cheered On DDoS Attack On Musk-Trump ‘X’ Interview.

Vice President Kamala Harris‘ campaign cheered on a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) targeting X—a leading American company—on Monday, as it disrupted a conversation between former President Donald J. Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk.

DDoS attacks involve flooding websites with bogus bot or botnet traffic to sabotage their functionality or knock them offline altogether. The one on the Trump-Musk X space comes as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is investigating a recent hack of the Trump campaign, attributed to Iran, in which internal emails were accessed.

Nevertheless, the Vice President’s team appeared thrilled that her leading election arrival—and a top U.S. business—were targeted again on Monday, trolling him on his Truth Social platform. Once their conversation concluded, Harris‘ team put out a statement sneering at Trump and Musk as “self-obsessed rich guys… who cannot run a livestream in the year 2024.”

In addition to purchasing X, formerly Twitter, Musk has built a number of successful companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, which provides high-quality Intenet connections to users in over 100 countries via the Starlink satellite network.

In contrast, Harris has connected no one to the Internet since Joe Biden appointed her as America’s rural broadband czar in 2021, with a budget of $42 billion.

Image by Steve Rhodes.

show less
Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign cheered on a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) targeting X—a leading American company—on Monday, as it disrupted a conversation between former President Donald J. Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk. show more

Tim Walz Compared ICE Enforcement Actions Against Illegal Immigrants to ‘Terrorism.’

Kamala Harris’s 2024 running mate, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), once compared U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions to identify and detain illegal immigrants to terrorism. The Democratic Party’s vice presidential nominee made the remarks during a 2017 campaign event for Representative Angie Craig (D-MN).

“The week after I was elected in 2006… I drove out to Worthington as the congressman-elect, went into the basement of the Catholic Church where Father Brixius was, who asked me to look around at all the children crying, and he said, ‘This is what terrorism looks like in America today,’” Walz told a small group of Minnesota Democrats who began to applaud.

Walz continued, telling the room: “What I told them at that time is that I hold the voting card in my pocket, and the votes I will take will be to make sure we protect these folks.”

The specific ICE enforcement action that was at the root of Walz‘s story was a 2006 raid conducted by the agency against a ring of illegal immigrants accused of stealing or purchasing the Social Security numbers of actual U.S. citizens and legal residents in order to obtain jobs at Swift Company meat packing facilities. The raid netted over 100 illegal immigrants with falsified or stolen paperwork.

Walz’s pro-open border and anti-immigration enforcement message isn’t the only one on the Democratic Party’s 2024 presidential ticket. The National Pulse previously reported that Kamala Harris has compared ICE to the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) and declared former President Donald J. Trump‘s border wall a “vanity project.”

Harris, who has served as Joe Biden‘s vice president and border czar since 2021, has repeatedly come under fire for the ongoing illegal immigration crisis and her far-left immigration policy views.

WATCH:

show less
Kamala Harris's 2024 running mate, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), once compared U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions to identify and detain illegal immigrants to terrorism. The Democratic Party's vice presidential nominee made the remarks during a 2017 campaign event for Representative Angie Craig (D-MN). show more
nailed it

NAILED IT: Media Hails ‘Snap Election’ Strategy First Reported by The National Pulse.

The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, warned in mid-July that the Democratic Party would employ a snap election, snap candidate strategy in the United States similar to those used by globalists in Europe to head off a populist electoral insurgency in France and ensure a Labour victory in the United Kingdom. Now, the American corporate media is embracing the country’s own ‘snap’ election candidate as a good thing, throwing their support behind corrupt backroom dealing in candidate selection.

“It’s all very important to what happens in November. I just think you have to be very, very careful here, especially of the Biden stuff, because you had a snap election in the UK, and you had a snap election in France,” Kassam explained last month. He continued, arguing that Biden would be replaced at the top of the ticked—essentially creating a ‘snap’ candidate and election scenario before the November election. The short amount of time until ballots are cast would prevent a thorough public vetting of the new Democrat nominee.

EMBRACING ‘SNAP’ ELECTION.

With Biden‘s replacement by his vice president, Kamala Harris, having come to pass, the corporate media is backing the exceptionally brief campaign cycle for Harris as ‘good’ for democracy. “Did Kamala accidentally stumble into a new model for a very short campaign? What if a[sic] party pushed all the primaries into the weeks before the convention?” Semafor Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith wrote on X (formerly Twitter). He added: “The long American campaigns have a real downside.”

Echoing Smith’s sentiments, Vanity Fair correspondent and former CNN flunkie Brian Stelter posted: “An end to never-ending campaigns?”

The swapping of Harris for Biden has upended the 2024 presidential race, which is now a dead heat between the Democratic Party candidate and former President Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Biden‘s exit from the race has tamped down public concerns over the 81-year-old Democrat’s clear cognitive decline—though he remains in the White House.

 

show less
The National Pulse's Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, warned in mid-July that the Democratic Party would employ a snap election, snap candidate strategy in the United States similar to those used by globalists in Europe to head off a populist electoral insurgency in France and ensure a Labour victory in the United Kingdom. Now, the American corporate media is embracing the country's own 'snap' election candidate as a good thing, throwing their support behind corrupt backroom dealing in candidate selection. show more

Copycat Kamala Steals Trump’s ‘No Tax on Tips’ Policy.

Kamala Harris plagiarized Donald Trump’s popular ‘no tax on tips’ campaign policy, even unveiling it in the same city as her Republican challenger.

The details: During a rally on Saturday, Harris pledged to “eliminate taxes on tips” for service workers.

Back up: More than two months earlier, on June 9, Trump unveiled his proposal, saying: “We are going to not charge taxes on tips.”

Trading places: Adding to the shamelessness, Harris even unveiled her copycat plan in the same city where Trump did—Las Vegas, Nevada.

Trump reacted, posting on Truth Social: “Kamala has no imagination, whatsoever, as shown by the fact that she played “COPYCAT” with, NO TAXES ON TIPS!”

Hypocrite: Earlier this year, Kamala bragged on X that she was “proud to cast the tie-breaking vote to pass our Inflation Reduction Act.”

However, she failed to mention that the Inflation Reduction Act included strict new rules meant to crack down on service workers’ underreported tips.

Big picture: Harris has been the Democrat nominee for three weeks, but has yet to release a policy platform and has not sat for an interview or press conference to discuss her policies.

Maybe tomorrow Harris will release her plan to ‘build the wall’…

show less
Kamala Harris plagiarized Donald Trump’s popular ‘no tax on tips’ campaign policy, even unveiling it in the same city as her Republican challenger. show more