GET THE APP
Monday, August 11, 2025

Category: Exclusive
August 1, 2025
Raheem J. Kassam
Exclusive

EXC: Inside the UK Parliament Committee Where Nigel Farage Blasted Top Democrats for Insulting Christians, Western Heritage, and Donald Trump.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Democratic members of Congress interfered in UK politics during a parliamentary committee meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jamie Raskin, Eric Swalwell, Jasmine Crockett, and Nigel Farage.

📍WHEN & WHERE: A recent UK parliamentary committee meeting in the UK Parliament’s Grand Committee Chamber.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Rep. Raskin started by disagreeing that the US had been founded on Judeo-Christian values… and then commenced a shouting tirade about Donald Trump…” – Insider source

🎯IMPACT: The incident highlighted tensions between US and UK political figures over free speech and censorship.

IN FULL

The National Pulse has received exclusive details from inside a key UK parliament committee meeting, where top Democratic members of Congress, including Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA), and others put on a pro-censorship show, interfered in UK politics, and attacked the President of the United States in an overseas parliamentary forum.

The details, which The National Pulse can report, did not come from a political source, but rather from independent observers in the proceedings, who described a roundtable discussion on free speech chaired by Reform Party leader Nigel Farage MP. After the proceedings, Raskin and Swalwell were so humiliated that they leaked stories to the press in a clear-cut case of foreign political interference, with the hope of damaging populist leader Farage.

EXC: The itinerary of the UK parliament meeting.

FOREIGN POLITICAL INTERFERENCE.

“Farage just looked unhinged and like a giant manbaby,” Raskin told the corporate media, after being reprimanded for attempting to derail the proceedings by ranting against U.S. President Donald J. Trump in the British parliament.

“Nigel chaired the roundtable and, during his introductory speech, happened to comment on the fact that our countries are founded on Judeo-Christian values,” said one source, adding: “Rep. Raskin started by disagreeing that the US had been founded on Judeo-Christian values at all, and then commenced a shouting tirade about Donald Trump’s alleged lack of regard for free speech, which bore absolutely no relation to anything the speakers had said.”

“Nigel repeatedly tried to tell him that we weren’t there to talk about Donald Trump, we were there to talk about ‘the impact of this on the freedom of the ordinary man and woman’. To this, Rep. Raskin just continued his tirade while shouting ‘you trying to shut me down shows how much respect you have for freedom of speech’, while Rep. Swalwell (whose only notable contribution to the event thus far had been loudly speaking to Rep. Raskin while one of the UK speakers had been giving their speech) egged him on and laughed.”

RUDE RASKIN.

Worse still, The National Pulse understands from a source that when one of the UK speakers had raised the case of a Christian veteran who had been convicted for silently praying outside an abortion clinic, Rep. Raskin flippantly dismissed the case as “the guy who hung around outside an abortion clinic because he probably regretted what he and his girlfriend had done years before.”

At that point, Farage is understood to have called Raskin “the rudest man he had ever met.”

A source told The National Pulse: “I don’t blame [Farage]… I have never witnessed that level of unprofessionalism and discourtesy, ever, in the course of an international career.”

The delegation was also joined by Democrat Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), who allegedly “spent the entire time with her head down, chewing gum and scrolling through her phone.”

CENSORSHIP.

The National Pulse reported yesterday how Raskin praised Britain’s new “Online Safety Act,” which is already being used to censor information available to Britons on the internet.

“At no point did any of those three representatives actually substantively engage with the concept of the threat posed to US companies and citizens, or show any concern for anything other than attacking Trump,” an internal observer noted.

“Rep. Raskin has revelled in the fact he made the comment ‘this is why we had a revolution against you guys’ (which he had to say multiple times, as it didn’t land with anyone except for Rep. Swalwell).”

“If that revolution meant we avoided having [Raskin’s] calibre of representative in Parliament, we should start celebrating July 4th in the UK, too,” they concluded.

show less
show more
July 10, 2025
Exclusive

EXC: Epstein Lawyer Jay Lefkowitz Now Helping Columbia University Get Off Trump’s Hook.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Jay Lefkowitz, known for once securing a lenient deal for sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, is now negotiating on behalf of Columbia University to restore its federal funding.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jay Lefkowitz, Columbia University, and the federal government under the Trump Administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Current negotiations following actions against Columbia by the Trump Administration, including a suspension of $400M in federal grants.

🎯IMPACT: Potential restoration of hundreds of millions in federal funding and protection of Columbia’s accreditation and tax-exempt status.

IN FULL

Jay Lefkowitz, the lawyer who once helped carve out a sweetheart deal for sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, is now orchestrating another behind-the-scenes maneuver—this time on behalf of Columbia University, The National Pulse has learned.

Sources tell The National Pulse that Lefkowitz has outplayed federal negotiators in the Trump administration and is on the verge of finalizing an agreement with the U.S. government to rescue the far-left college from the brink of financial disaster. This involves restoring over $400 million in suspended federal grants and preserving its tax-exempt status and accreditation, even as the university faces accusations of civil rights violations and internal bigotry against both Trump supporters and Jewish students.

Lefkowitz’s name is infamous among legal and political observers. In 2007, while a partner at Kirkland & Ellis, he helped broker a non-prosecution deal with then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta that let Epstein dodge a 53-count federal indictment in Florida. The pair met at a Marriott 70 miles from the prosecutor’s office to hammer out the secret arrangement. Epstein would plead guilty to state prostitution charges, serve just 13 months with work-release perks, and—most shockingly—his victims would never be notified, a blatant violation of federal law.

When the agreement eventually surfaced a decade later, Acosta was forced to resign as Trump’s Secretary of Labor. Lefkowitz, meanwhile, doubled down—personally appealing to Manhattan authorities to minimize Epstein’s sex offender registration requirements.

In May, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that Columbia “violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act” by ignoring anti-Semitic harassment on campus. The Trump Administration responded by cutting off federal funds and moving to review Columbia’s accreditation—a potential deathblow to an Ivy League institution long viewed as untouchable.

Lefkowitz is reportedly working to scrub the damage and convince federal officials to settle. A source familiar with the negotiations said he’s “close to another miracle,” despite Columbia’s long list of controversies.

Among them:

— The university published a formal protocol instructing students and staff how to resist ICE enforcement actions;

— Internal text messages from Claire Shipman, Chair of the Board of Trustees and Acting President, show her scheming to oust a Jewish board member and “replace her with somebody from the Middle East or who is Arab.”

— Columbia’s leadership has refused to take accountability for weeks of on-campus intimidation and harassment targeting Jewish students during the Gaza-related protests.

Meanwhile, this week, the Department of Justice and the FBI attempted to close the book on the Epstein case with a curt two-page memo. It claimed there was “no client list” and reaffirmed the government’s position that Epstein died by suicide in 2019, despite widespread skepticism and a mountain of unanswered questions. The timing of that announcement, coming as Lefkowitz works his magic once again, has raised eyebrows in both legal and political circles.

Lefkowitz has historically been a major donor to ‘RINO’ Republican candidates such as Nikki Haley, Jeb Bush, and Mitt Romney. His most recent political contribution was to New York Democrat Ritchie Torres, who represents part of the Bronx neighborhood. Lefkowitz has also represented anti-Trump activist and failed magazine editor Bill Kristol.

show less
show more
May 5, 2025
Raheem J. Kassam
Analysis
Exclusive

Panzer Panic: The Atlantic’s Failed Smear of Decorated Veteran Joe Kent – The National Pulse Investigates.

PULSE POINTS:

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Atlantic published an article implying that veteran and Trump nominee Joe Kent may harbor Nazi sympathies because of a tattoo reading “Panzer”—German for “tank”—on his arm.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Joe Kent, a former Congressional candidate and Army Ranger; The Atlantic, owned by Democrat megadonor Laurene Powell Jobs; left-wing journalist David Corn; and activist Heidi Beirich, formerly of the discredited SPLC.

🧾KEY QUOTES: “I asked the administration to address concerns that one of the president’s nominees has a tattoo associated with Nazis, and its response was to make a joke.” — The Atlantic

⚠️FALLOUT: The Atlantic misidentified a Trump administration spokesman and leaned on a blurry tweet for evidence. The National Pulse has found counterevidence showing Kent’s “Panzer Jäger” tattoos are linked to his anti-tank military service. Legal action is reportedly under consideration.

📌SIGNIFICANCE: The article appears to conflate military culture with extremism to undermine a Trump nominee while deflecting from scrutiny of MS-13 gang tattoos in immigration enforcement cases. The smear is collapsing under factual scrutiny.

OUR EXCLUSIVE REPORTING IN FULL:

On May 1, The Atlantic magazine, owned by Democrat megadonor Laurene Powell Jobs, published an article entitled, “Who Gets Panzer Tattooed on Their Arm?”

The story, about military veteran and counter-terrorism widower Joe Kent, was drafted to imply the former Congressional candidate has “far right” and/or “Nazi” sympathies–a tired smear against anyone on the political right, and one which has its roots in the defense of communism on American soil.

The Atlantic, which once endorsed eugenics, asserted: “…you can see why it’s noteworthy that Joseph Kent, Donald Trump’s nominee to head the National Counterterrorism Center, has a panzer tattoo.”

The piece relies on the reporting of David Corn, a far-left author whose last real scoop came over a decade ago, and who is most recently known for having peddled the Russia hoax to sell books.

Still, The Atlantic would go on to use Corn’s flimsy reporting–a tweet featuring a blurry picture of Kent and his son–to at least imply that Kent is covertly a Nazi, by having the German word for “tank” tattooed on his arm.

The article’s author says he received no explanation from “Ashley Henning,” of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, where Kent now works. There is, in fact, no “Ashley Henning” at that office. The Atlantic likely meant Alexa Henning, a well-known conservative communications operative, which anyone who did some basic research and/or fact-checking would have known.

An even bigger fact-checking flub appears wherein The Atlantic consults far-left “expert” Heidi Beirich, once affiliated with the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who now runs the so-called Global Project Against Hate and Extremism.

The tattoo “could mean that he’s glorifying the Nazis. Or it could have a different context,” Beirich told them. “I don’t think I’ve run across a panzer,” she concluded.

But Panzer tattoos are, in fact, not uncommon in anti-tank divisions of the U.S. Army. Especially when combined, as The Atlantic even admits, with the German word for ‘hunter’–”Jäger.”

Here’s what the author wrote next:

Other discernible possibilities make less sense. Right-wing accounts on X have spread the claim that Kent has jäger—German for “hunter”—tattooed on his other arm. The two tattoos together would add up to “tank hunter.” The accounts claim that heavy-anti-armor-weapons crewman was one of Kent’s jobs in the Army. It’s oddly specific enough to sound plausible, except that I couldn’t find any evidence that Kent was part of an anti-tank unit—let alone one that would be targeting German tanks—or that he even has a jäger tattoo on his other arm.

The National Pulse, however, has found evidence that Kent both a) has a “jäger” tattoo on his other arm, and b) served in an anti-tank section of the 2nd Ranger Battalion from 1998 to 2001.

Pictured: Joe Kent with a ‘JÄGER’ tattoo on his other arm, Kent in the anti-tank Ranger division, and Kent posing with an anti-tank Ranger division poster.

Furthermore, U.S. army veterans and those who routinely report on the subject will know that tattoo inspections are often required to ensure members of the military aren’t Nazis, extremists of other kinds, or gang members. Kent himself has had a top-secret security clearance for around two decades. To hold Kent’s TS/SCI, one must undergo a single scope background investigation (SSBI) and polygraph tests.

The author of The Atlantic article wasn’t impressed by the administration’s response.

“I asked the administration to address concerns that one of the president’s nominees has a tattoo associated with Nazis, and its response was to make a joke.”

But the tattoo isn’t associated with Nazis. In fact, “Panzer Jäger” was popularized amongst Americans after the Second World War, and after Germany and its Bundeswehr became critical NATO members in the fight against the Soviet Union. If anything, the tattoo is pro-NATO and anti-Communist, and nothing at all to do with Nazism.

The rationale for the article is made clear around halfway through. Once again, it is a flimsy defense of MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose knuckle tattoos are, in fact, a strong hint at his gang status. The Atlantic claims:

The Trump administration seems to strongly agree with the notion that tattoos are meaningful—but only when convenient for the president’s agenda. Consider Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland resident the Trump administration deported to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, prison camp last month. Garcia was living with protected legal status in the U.S., and the government’s own lawyers have acknowledged that he was deported because of an “administrative error.” Trump loyalists have doubled down on Garcia’s detention, in part pointing to his tattoos.

So, once again, in defense of criminal illegal migrants and open borders, another so-called great American journalistic institution has beclowned itself in another failed smear at a member of the Trump administration.

Sources tell me that Kent is carefully considering his legal options against The Atlantic and the article’s author.

To help The National Pulse with more investigative work, please consider donating here or joining our membership program with its added benefits here.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
April 4, 2025
Exclusive

EXC: SecDef Hegseth Heads to Panama for Security Talks, Troop Visits.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will travel to Panama next week to participate in the 2025 Central American Security Conference (CENTSEC), followed by a stop at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida.

🧑‍🤝‍🧑Who’s Involved: Hegseth will engage with senior civilian and military leaders from Panama and across Central America. He will also visit with members of the 7th Special Forces Group in Florida. The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam will accompany the Secretary on the trip.

🎯Why It Matters: As instability and transnational criminal activity rise in the region, Hegseth’s visit underscores the United States’ intent to deepen regional defense partnerships and maintain leadership in the Western Hemisphere.

📍Where & When: The trip begins early next week. Hegseth will first stop in Panama City, Panama, before traveling to Eglin AFB in Florida.

📣Official Word: “This trip supports our shared vision for a peaceful and secure Western Hemisphere,” said Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell.

IN FULL:

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will travel to Panama next week for the 2025 Central American Security Conference (CENTSEC), where he’ll hold high-level meetings with regional defense officials to strengthen U.S. partnerships in the Western Hemisphere. He will then continue to Eglin Air Force Base in Florida to visit U.S. troops stationed with the elite 7th Special Forces Group.

The trip comes as U.S. officials look to solidify military relationships across Latin America amid rising concerns over cartel activity, Chinese influence operations, and political instability throughout the region. Hegseth’s meetings will include a series of bilateral sit-downs with senior military, civilian, and security leaders from Panama and neighboring nations.

Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell framed the visit as part of a broader push to reinforce regional security cooperation. “This trip supports our shared vision for a peaceful and secure Western Hemisphere,” Parnell said.

The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, will accompany Secretary Hegseth on the trip. This is a refreshing instance of an independent media figure embedded in an official Department of Defense delegation. Kassam will provide exclusive coverage and commentary on the trip’s proceedings, especially for members of The National Pulse.

CENTSEC, hosted annually, serves as a strategic venue for U.S. and Central American officials to coordinate efforts on transnational threats, narcotics trafficking, and irregular migration patterns—issues that have taken on renewed urgency since the Biden government’s destructive open border policies.

Following the conference in Panama City, Hegseth will travel to Eglin AFB to meet with command leadership and service members attached to the 7th Special Forces Group, a key unit in America’s unconventional warfare and regional engagement strategy.

The visit to Central America and one of the U.S. military’s premier special operations installations underscores the Pentagon’s dual mission: to build stronger partnerships abroad while maintaining elite readiness at home.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
Yes, you read it right
for exclusive members-only insights
Yes, you read it right show more
for exclusive members-only insights
February 19, 2025
William Upton
Exclusive

EXC: VP Vance Says He Knew Munich Speech Would ‘Piss a Lot of People Off,’ Blasts German Reaction as ‘Too Rich.’

U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance is brushing off pushback from Germany’s Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, who called his speech at the Munich Security Conference last week “not acceptable.” In an exclusive interview with The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam, Vice President Vance described Pistorius’s reaction as “too rich”—but revealed he understood his speech would “piss a lot of people off.”

“My criticism was Europeans need to be more accepting of free speech. And his response was not to engage with anything that I said but to say this is not acceptable,” Vance explained. “So, almost endorsing the censorship regime at that very moment and not doing what I counseled our European friends to do, which is actually debate ideas and engage with some of the public criticisms a little bit more.”

“I mean, look, I knew that it would piss a lot of people off,” Vance said, adding: ” I knew that there were a lot of dissidents in Europe who would be invigorated by it.”

While the Europeans, especially the Germans, appear to have not necessarily taken the criticism of their censorship in stride, Vance expressed surprise that many of the leaders did not pick up on his equally stern words for the previous U.S. government under former President Joe Biden. “The one thing that I’m a little surprised by is the thing that I said midway through the speech, give or take, is that the biggest driver of this was actually the Biden administration,” the Vice President said.

“Like, my goal was not to sort of wag my finger at Europe and say, you guys have become too censorious,” Vance continued. “My goal was to say, [it was] the Biden administration and the transatlantic alliance together. This is an American and European problem. It has stopped in America because of the leadership of Donald Trump. And we want it to stop in Europe too because we really do believe in the values of free expression and free exchange.”

show less
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance is brushing off pushback from Germany's Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, who called his speech at the Munich Security Conference last week "not acceptable." In an exclusive interview with The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam, Vice President Vance described Pistorius's reaction as "too rich"—but revealed he understood his speech would "piss a lot of people off." show more
February 19, 2025
Jack Montgomery
1A
Exclusive
UK

EXC: VP Vance *WILL* Raise Free Speech Issues with UK Govt During Official Visit Next Week.

Vice President J.D. Vance told Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, that he will reiterate the Trump administration’s commitment to freedom of speech when Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer visits the U.S. next week. This follows Vice President Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, in which he warned against the erosion of free speech in Europe, and the subsequent imprisonment of a British man for sending emails intended to “insult and offend” London Mayor Sadiq Khan and government minister Jess Phillips, from Starmer’s Labour Party.

Asked by Kassam if he planned to reiterate his comments t Starmer and his team next week in person, Vance responded, “We certainly will,” adding, “[T]his is not hard, Raheem. We’re simply telling them to respect the values on which our civilization was founded, that you ought to debate with one another, you ought to, you know, your government should respect when the people have a dissenting viewpoint. It’s very simple, and it’s very obvious.”

“And I think that, when we talk about shared values, I think one of the most important shared values is that we, again, ought to listen to our people and not try to throw them in prison when they disagree with what the government’s doing,” he stressed.

Vance said the strong, adverse reaction to his Munich speech “from some of our European friends” indicates that “frankly, they’ve taken too much leadership from the Biden administration” and “leaned too much into the censorship regime.”

Earlier in his interview with Kassam, the Vice President highlighted that the purpose of his speech in Munich was not to “wag my finger at Europe and say, ‘You guys have become too censorious,'” but to note that the U.S. and its transatlantic partners together had developed a censorship problem, led by the Biden-Harris government.

“[A]s I said in Europe, President Trump is going to take a much different view on this stuff,” Vance emphasized.

show less
Vice President J.D. Vance told Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, that he will reiterate the Trump administration's commitment to freedom of speech when Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer visits the U.S. next week. This follows Vice President Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, in which he warned against the erosion of free speech in Europe, and the subsequent imprisonment of a British man for sending emails intended to "insult and offend" London Mayor Sadiq Khan and government minister Jess Phillips, from Starmer's Labour Party. show more
February 19, 2025
Raheem J. Kassam
Exclusive

EXCLUSIVE: VP J.D. Vance Warns Zelensky Over ‘Disgraceful’ Public Attacks on Trump, Confirms Ukrainian Elections Are Now U.S. Policy.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In an exclusive interview with The National Pulse on Wednesday morning, Vice President J.D. Vance issued a stern warning to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky regarding his public criticisms of President Donald Trump and the administration’s peace initiatives. Vance described Zelensky’s approach as “disgraceful” and counterproductive, emphasizing that such tactics could jeopardize Ukraine’s relationship with its most crucial ally.

BAD ADVICE.

“Zelensky is getting really bad advice, and I don’t know from whom,” Vance said. “He’s not dealing with Joe Biden and the Biden administration anymore. He’s dealing with Donald Trump and the Trump administration.”

Vance warned against Zelensky’s public protestations in recent days, stating, “The idea that he’s going to litigate his disagreements with the president in the public square—I mean, you [Raheem] know the President very well, obviously, I know the President very well. This is not a good way to deal with President Trump,” Vance said. “Of course, the Ukrainians are going to have their perspective. The way to surface that is in a private discussion with American diplomats… he’s attacking the only reason this country exists, publicly, right now. And it’s disgraceful. And it’s not something that is going to move the President of the United States. In fact, it’s going to have the opposite effect.”

The Vice President reaffirmed Trump’s policy on Ukraine: the war must end. He further asserted that U.S. policy now requires that Ukraine have elections.

“The president won the election. He won it convincingly. And he’s made clear that American policy is to stop the killing and bring the war to a close,” Vance said. “Now, I talked to the President this morning, actually, and he has an incredible amount of sympathy and admiration for the people of Ukraine. He wants the killing to stop because he doesn’t want innocent Ukrainians to keep losing their lives. So I think he very much thinks about this from the perspective, not just, of course, of his obligations to the United States, but also he just. He wants the brutality and the killing to stop.”

Vance went on, stressing the point: “He has said the goal of administration policy is to end the conflict. So now, you know that has to happen. Right. Zelensky has to take that seriously. Our European allies have to take that seriously. That is the goal of administration policy. You’re not going to move the President away from that goal. You’re not going to change his mind, certainly not by attacking him publicly in the media.”

ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE.

Elections in Ukraine are now U.S. policy, with Vance making it clear that Zelensky must submit to a democratic mandate if he wants continued legitimacy. “Certainly, that would give him the strongest position, Raheem,” Vance said when asked if elections were necessary. “And I think that it’s a little rich for some of our European friends to attack Donald Trump for suggesting that Ukraine should have elections when they say that this is a war for democracy. How can you attack elections when your entire framing for the war in Ukraine is that it’s a war for democracy? I just think it’s ridiculous. And, of course, the United States had a civil war. We had an election in, of course, at the, at the end of as scheduled. You know, Churchill found out that he lost. As I understand it, he found out that he lost the British election at Potsdam.”

Vance, fresh from his European trip, where he lectured European leaders on free speech and matters of conscience, hit them again in our exclusive interview for their hypocrisy on democracy, questioning their insistence on blocking elections.

“The idea that you cannot have elections in the midst of a war is, I think, kind of a preposterous idea. And the President has made very clear that he thinks that should happen. So, you know, that is, that is American policy. And I think it’s. It’s pretty simple and straightforward.”

Martial law currently prohibits elections in Ukraine, with Zelensky having used the conflict with Russia to effectively crush opposition political parties and enrich his inner circle.

The Vice President’s remarks come just after President Trump himself blasted Zelensky as a “dictator” who “better move fast” for his country’s continued existence.

The National Pulse is a truly independent news outlet, free of political or corporate cash. We are 100% funded by people who donate here, or join up as members. Please support our important work today.

show less
WASHINGTON, D.C. – In an exclusive interview with The National Pulse on Wednesday morning, Vice President J.D. Vance issued a stern warning to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky regarding his public criticisms of President Donald Trump and the administration's peace initiatives. Vance described Zelensky's approach as "disgraceful" and counterproductive, emphasizing that such tactics could jeopardize Ukraine's relationship with its most crucial ally. show more
February 18, 2025
Raheem J. Kassam
Exclusive

Amb Ric Grenell Has a Stark Message for Europe.

Speaking to the Vice President’s traveling press pool in Munich late last week, Former U.S. Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell had a stark message for his European colleagues and counterparts: you’re doing it again.

The “it,” as he put it, represents “missing the boat” in terms of tough dealing, with much of Europe adopting a supine prostration towards the Chinese Communist Party’s global efforts, rather than confronting it as an authoritarian regime.

“Look, I’m a German expert because I used to be the ambassador here,” he told The National Pulse from the basement of the Commerzbank in Munich, “And what makes me very pleased is to hear the Germans say, ‘we should have done this years ago,’ [with regards to NATO]. Holding myself back from saying, ‘I told you so.’ Donald Trump was right.

“But I’m shocked that there is an actual belief, and it’s now being articulated, not just something that they think, but an actual articulation that they should have done these things a long time ago.

“I think that within the foreign policy establishment of Europe, there is an inward look to say, did we bring this war on ourselves? Were we too close to Russia? I’ve said this publicly many times, but in my conversations with Chancellor Merkel, early, long time ago, 2019-ish, she said, look, the problem with you Americans is you don’t understand that we Germans have a different relationship with the Russians. We can control them. That was not true.

“And whether it’s Nord Stream 2, Iran sanctions, or NATO spending, Donald Trump was right on all these. And so it’s nice to see the Europeans kind of inwardly say, yeah, we should have done it.

“Now I quickly switch the ground on them and say, and you’re doing it on China now. You missed the boat on Russia before and you’re doing it. You’re missing it on China now. Clean it up, get focused on it now.”

Grenell’s warnings will be music to the ears of China hawks around the United States, and will doubtless set tongues further wagging in Europe, following Vice President J.D. Vance’s extraordinary intervention on the subjects of mass migration, free speech, and conscience issues last week at the Munich Security Forum.

Grenell, who was one of the favorites to be President Trump’s Secretary of State nominee, is now set to run the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., as well as informally advise on a number of high-level diplomatic issues.

show less
Speaking to the Vice President's traveling press pool in Munich late last week, Former U.S. Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell had a stark message for his European colleagues and counterparts: you're doing it again. show more
January 17, 2025
William Upton
Exclusive

EXC: San Francisco Settles With Judicial Watch, Will End Taxpayer-Funded Transgender Guaranteed Income Program.

The City of San Francisco is settling a taxpayer lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch regarding a guaranteed-income program preferencing “biological black and Latino men who identify as women” and funded through the public’s tax dollars. In a seven-to-three vote on Friday, the San Francisco City and County Board of Supervisors authorized a settlement agreement that ends the racially and transgender-identity-biased program, commits the city not to allow similar new programs, and pays $3,250 in attorney’s fees.

“This settlement is a huge victory for taxpayers who oppose taxpayer-funded woke racism and transgender extremism,” Judicial Watch’s President, Tom Fitton, told The National Pulse in a statement. He continued: “This settlement agreement puts a stop to the illegal use taxpayer money to hand out free cash to transgender individuals based on race and sex in blatant violation of California’s constitution.”

Consequently, the ordinance enacted by the Board of Supervisors and signed by San Francisco Mayor London Breed states: “The Settlement Agreement provides: (1) payment of $3,250 in attorney’s fees and costs; and (2) injunctive relief agreeing that the City will not continue the guaranteed income program that Paul Wildes and Reed Sandberg alleged to be unlawful beyond September 2024 and an agreement that the City will not create a new guaranteed income program with the same eligibility criteria.”

In January last year, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on behalf of San Francisco taxpayers against Mayor Breed, City Treasurer Jose Cisneros, the director of the city’s Office of Transgender Initiatives, and City Administrator Carmen Chu. Subsequently, the legal watchdog group charged that Mayor Breed’s 2022-initiated Guaranteed Income for Trans People (GIFT) program’s preference-based qualification criteria violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. According to the Mayor’s Office, GIFT would “provide low-income transgender San Franciscans with $1,200 each month, up to 18 months to help address financial insecurity within trans communities.”

Image by Gabriel Classon.

show less
The City of San Francisco is settling a taxpayer lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch regarding a guaranteed-income program preferencing "biological black and Latino men who identify as women" and funded through the public's tax dollars. In a seven-to-three vote on Friday, the San Francisco City and County Board of Supervisors authorized a settlement agreement that ends the racially and transgender-identity-biased program, commits the city not to allow similar new programs, and pays $3,250 in attorney’s fees. show more
October 18, 2024
Raheem J. Kassam
Exclusive

EXCLUSIVE: Bannon Prison Statement – ‘Biden-Harris Are Illegally Holding Me Past My Release Date.’

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Former Trump White House Chief Advisor Stephen K. Bannon has issued a blistering statement, sent to The National Pulse, explaining how the Biden-Harris regime is holding him illegally, refusing to accept his First Step Act eligibility, and incarcerating him longer than required in order to swing the election.

“Kamala Harris is the ‘Queen of Mass Incarcerations’,” Bannon told The National Pulse, “detested by black and hispanic men who are refusing to turn out and vote for her. She has done nothing to implement President Trump’s heroic First Step Act, in fact welcoming hundreds of thousands of hardened illegal migrant criminals while allowing US citizens eligible for early release to rot in prison. No mass deportations, but continual mass incarcerations.”

On August 29, 2024, Bannon filed a motion to reimpose bail or impose a period of supervised release. The government’s response to Mr. Bannon’s en banc petition has been pending for over 75 days. His lawyers say, “the Court should grant Mr. Bannon’s motion for bail pending completion of Supreme Court review, and order the Bureau of Prisons to release Mr. Bannon immediately.”

Bannon continued: “Harris will lose this election on her inability to get black and hispanic men to vote for her in Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Las Vegas. The four years she did nothing for family reunification of American citizen prisoners while genuflecting to illegal alien criminals is coming back to bite her. Her Indian heritage surely taught her: Karma is a Bitch.”

He concluded: “The Harris Bureau of Prisons is illegally holding me past my legal release date–trying to eliminate one of President Trump’s strongest advocates–these criminals reek of desperation.”

The First Step Act passed in December 2018 aims to reform the federal prison system by reducing sentences for non-violent offenders and focusing on rehabilitation. A key provision allows inmates to earn time credits through participation in educational and vocational programs, potentially leading to early release into pre-release custody, such as halfway houses or home confinement. The law also expands compassionate release for elderly or terminally ill prisoners.

Bannon is expected to be released on October 29th, though qualified for First Step Act early release last month.

show less
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Former Trump White House Chief Advisor Stephen K. Bannon has issued a blistering statement, sent to The National Pulse, explaining how the Biden-Harris regime is holding him illegally, refusing to accept his First Step Act eligibility, and incarcerating him longer than required in order to swing the election. show more