GET THE APP
Sunday, October 5, 2025

Category: Election Integrity

paxton
October 17, 2024
Jack Montgomery
Election 2024
Election Integrity

In the Absence of the RNC, 15 State Attorneys General Are Stepping Up…

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, joined by 15 other state attorneys general, sent a letter to Biden-Harris Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, demanding that DHS fulfill its legal obligation to assist states in verifying the citizenship of registered voters.

On October 7, Paxton formally requested the federal government provide data on the citizenship status of individuals who may have illegally registered to vote in Texas. Paxton attached a list of approximately 450,000 voters who registered without presenting a state-issued driver’s license or ID, meaning their citizenship status had not been confirmed. This request triggered the federal government’s legal duty to respond. Several other states have made similar demands to ensure the accuracy of their voter rolls.

However, the Biden-Harris government has not granted states access to the federal databases needed to verify noncitizens are not on voter rolls. While federal law makes it illegal for noncitizens to register to vote, vetting is weak. Courts have ruled that states cannot require proof of citizenship for voter registration. As a result, states must rely on federal databases to verify citizenship status.

In the letter, Paxton and the other attorneys general expressed frustration with DHS’s delayed responses, accusing the agency of failing to grant access to its Person Centric Query Service (PCQS) database, which is essential for verifying voter registration information. They argued that DHS is legally required to provide the information, regardless of its opinion on the usefulness of the data.

“Secretary Mayorkas owes every state the requested information without delay. They are legally obligated to assist in ensuring noncitizens are not registering or voting in American elections,” Paxton insists.

Despite the ban on noncitizen voting, research suggests foreigners do vote in U.S. elections, mainly for Democrats and in numbers significant enough to change the outcome.

show less
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, joined by 15 other state attorneys general, sent a letter to Biden-Harris Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, demanding that DHS fulfill its legal obligation to assist states in verifying the citizenship of registered voters. show more
October 15, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Famous GOP Strategist Says His Identity Is Being Used for Fake Donations to Kamala Harris Campaign.

A famed Republican strategist is taking legal action against ActBlue, accusing the Democratic fundraising platform of facilitating identity theft to make hundreds of unauthorized donations. Mark Block, who served as chief of staff to Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain in 2012 and was made internet famous after a “smoking man” advertisement, claims someone used his identity to make over $880 in donations between May and October without his approval.

Block directly accuses ActBlue of allowing a “smurfing” scheme. This involves keeping small contributions deliberately below a $200 threshold to bypass Federal Election Commission (FEC) reporting rules, violating federal election laws.

The lawsuit, filed in Waukesha County Court, alleges the donations constitute “racketeering activity” under Wisconsin law. Block has requested a temporary injunction to prevent further donations in his name. Block discovered the unauthorized contributions through receipts found in an email account associated with the Cain campaign. He notes numerous donations to Kamala Harris‘s campaign efforts and the LGBTQ-focused Equality PAC.

“Given [Block’s conservative] political leanings, he would never consent to monetary contributions to any of the ActBlue Campaigns,” the lawsuit notes, insisting he did not “make, authorize, or consent to these donations to the ActBlue Campaigns.”

The Republican-led House Committee on House Administration is already conducting a broader investigation into money laundering through ActBlue. Committee experts utilized artificial intelligence (AI) to scrutinize over 200 million FEC records and identified suspicious patterns. These include multiple small donations and contributions exceeding the financial capacity of purported donors.

The lawsuit cites an unidentified “John Doe” who allegedly used an American Express card linked to a Santa Monica address to make fraudulent donations with Block’s personal information. This case may be the first of several, as similar investigations commence in various states.

show less
A famed Republican strategist is taking legal action against ActBlue, accusing the Democratic fundraising platform of facilitating identity theft to make hundreds of unauthorized donations. Mark Block, who served as chief of staff to Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain in 2012 and was made internet famous after a "smoking man" advertisement, claims someone used his identity to make over $880 in donations between May and October without his approval. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
I’m old enough to remember when the smoking man ad came out
for exclusive members-only insights
I’m old enough to remember when the smoking man ad came out show more
for exclusive members-only insights
October 15, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Biden-Harris Govt Sues… Over Removal Noncitizens from Voter Rolls!?

The Biden-Harris government’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing Virginia. It alleges that the state’s approach to removing noncitizens and other ineligible voters from its rolls violates federal law. Announced in a filing last Friday, their lawsuit seeks to block actions taken by Governor Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) and the Virginia Department of Elections to maintain accurate voter registration lists.

Governor Youngkin, in an executive order released in August, disclosed the removal of 6,303 noncitizens from voter rolls from January 2022 to July 2024. This order was part of broader election security efforts ahead of the November elections. The Biden-Harris DOJ claims this action undermines the “Quiet Period Provision” of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). This statutory provision mandates that states must finish any systematic removal of ineligible voters at least 90 days before a federal election.

BIDEN-HARRIS LAWFARE.

“Section 8(c)(2) of the NVRA, also known as the Quiet Period Provision, requires states to complete systematic programs aimed at removing the names of ineligible voters from voter registration lists no later than 90 days before federal elections,” the DOJ contends. “The Quiet Period Provision applies to certain systematic programs carried out by states that are aimed at striking names from voter registration lists based on a perceived failure to meet initial eligibility requirements—including citizenship—at the time of registration.”

The suit argues that the state’s approach might lead to the mistaken removal of eligible voters, potentially hindering their ability to vote. Moreover, the lawsuit seeks to prevent Virginia from implementing these measures until after the upcoming elections, and to reinstate the removed registrations. Kristen Clarke, the DOJ’s far-left Civil Rights Division chief, is spearheading the lawfare effort.

YOUNGKIN RESPONDS.

Gov. Youngkin is defending the state’s actions. He cites adherence to a 2006 law requiring the removal of noncitizens from voter rolls. “Virginians—and Americans—will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth, the very crucible of American Democracy,” Youngkin said in response to the DOJ lawsuit.

“With the support of our Attorney General, we will defend these commonsense steps, that we are legally required to take, with every resource available to us. Virginia’s election will be secure and fair, and I will not stand idly by as this politically motivated action tries to interfere in our elections, period,” he added.

Research suggests noncitizens unlawfully vote in U.S. elections—primarily for Democrats—in numbers significant enough to change their results.

show less
The Biden-Harris government's Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing Virginia. It alleges that the state’s approach to removing noncitizens and other ineligible voters from its rolls violates federal law. Announced in a filing last Friday, their lawsuit seeks to block actions taken by Governor Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) and the Virginia Department of Elections to maintain accurate voter registration lists. show more
mail in ballot
October 12, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

State Officials Probing Alleged Voter Registration Fraud.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections is probing allegations of voter registration fraud, according to a Brunswick County elections official. Sara LaVere, director of the Brunswick County Board of Elections, stated that 18 individuals contacted her office about not filling out forms submitted under their names.

“We noticed some information that was different than what we had on record, an address, Social Security number, so we sent a letter to those voters asking them to complete that information,” LaVere explained. “The [fraudulent] state voter registration forms appear to come from a voter registration drive.”

“The first thing I want to point out is, you know, we use words like ‘anomalies,’ ‘suspicion,’ and everything else because we try to be PC, I guess. But this is fraud, outright fraudulent behavior,” added Hamilton County Board of Elections member Alex Triantafilou.

Data suggest the 2020 election featured a significant amount of mail-in ballot fraud, with potentially one in five votes cast being fraudulent.

NO ACTION?

Brunswick County election officials have alerted the state’s board of elections but have not yet received a response regarding the investigation’s progress. State officials have not commented on whether there are suspects or arrests.

One local resident in Leland, North Carolina, Shelley Gentner, reported receiving a letter from the county Board of Elections in August. The letter requested validation of her voter information, accompanied by a registration form containing incorrect personal details and a forged signature.

“I’m like, ‘Okay, someone has signed my name on an application. It’s not my signature. It’s not me,’” Gentner said.

Such an act is illegal under North Carolina law, potentially resulting in a Class I felony.

Election integrity concerns have been compounded by aggressive voter registration efforts and the chaos caused by Hurricane Helene.

Ohio is also experiencing election integrity issues, with numerous counties investigating voter registration fraud. In Hamilton County, inconsistencies were found in voter registration applications, including one under the name of the late Henry Kissinger.

show less
The North Carolina State Board of Elections is probing allegations of voter registration fraud, according to a Brunswick County elections official. Sara LaVere, director of the Brunswick County Board of Elections, stated that 18 individuals contacted her office about not filling out forms submitted under their names. show more
October 10, 2024
Election Integrity
Lawfare

Georgia Election Workers Demand Rudy Giuliani’s Yankees World Series Rings.

Andrew Giuliani has filed court documents to assert his ownership of four World Series rings, originally given to his father, Rudy Giuliani, by the New York Yankees following their championships in 1996, 1998, 1999, and 2000. The rings are at the center of a legal dispute involving a $148 million defamation judgment against Rudy Giuliani by Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss. The judgment stems from allegations Giuliani made about fraud in the 2020 presidential election, which Freeman and Moss argued caused them to face significant threats.

Andrew Giuliani, who ran for New York governor as a Republican in 2022, argues that his father gifted him the rings in 2018, according to court filings in Manhattan. He seeks to prevent Freeman and Moss from acquiring the rings as part of their efforts to collect on the defamation judgment. A judge has allowed Andrew Giuliani to intervene in this case.

Rudy Giuliani, hailed as “America’s Mayor” for his leadership in New York City following the September 11 terrorist attacks, is facing attempts to seize property such as his Manhattan apartment and jewelry collection, including the World Series rings. He is appealing the defamation judgment, arguing his statements on 2020 election fraud fall under free speech protections. He also contends that Freeman and Moss did not demonstrate “actual malice” on his part, a necessary component for winning defamation cases.

Freeman and Moss’s legal team has accused Rudy Giuliani of evading efforts to collect the exorbitant judgment through various legal maneuvers. Their litigation to secure the assets is proceeding with a hearing set for October 17.

show less
Andrew Giuliani has filed court documents to assert his ownership of four World Series rings, originally given to his father, Rudy Giuliani, by the New York Yankees following their championships in 1996, 1998, 1999, and 2000. The rings are at the center of a legal dispute involving a $148 million defamation judgment against Rudy Giuliani by Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss. The judgment stems from allegations Giuliani made about fraud in the 2020 presidential election, which Freeman and Moss argued caused them to face significant threats. show more
October 8, 2024
William Upton
Election 2024
Election Integrity

RNC Legal Fail Means Officials CAN ‘Cure’ Ballots After They’ve Been Cast.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has declined to hear a lawsuit brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Pennsylvania GOP to halt several of the state’s counties from engaging in so-called “notice and cure” procedures, which allow voters to make changes to their mail-in ballots after they are cast. According to the court, the lawsuit brought by the RNC and state party was too close to the election for a ruling to be made.

Critics have long alleged that the RNC under Ronna Romney-McDaniel and its new leadership had failed to take the required actions quickly enough to materially impact the 2024 election, with this case serving as further evidence. Chris LaCivita and Michael Whatley took over the RNC from McDaniel in early March 2024, allowing for plenty of time to file the case over the summer. They sued in late September, six months later.

Previously, the state’s high court held that counties do not have to allow “notice and cure” procedures; however, over half of Pennsylvania’s counties allow the practice.

While the court’s decision to not hear the “notice and cure” lawsuit is a blow to election integrity efforts in Pennsylvania—a critical swing state in the 2024 election that some believe may determine the presidential contest—the court did deliver a win for fair elections in a second decision handed down.

The court declined to hear a lawsuit brought by Democrat-aligned voting rights groups challenging a Pennsylvania law requiring mail-in ballots to be posted with the correct date in order to be tallied. Like the RNC lawsuit, the court determined that the filing had been made too close to the election to be ruled upon.

During the 2022 mid-term election, around 10,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified because their envelopes did not have the correct date.

show less
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has declined to hear a lawsuit brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Pennsylvania GOP to halt several of the state's counties from engaging in so-called “notice and cure” procedures, which allow voters to make changes to their mail-in ballots after they are cast. According to the court, the lawsuit brought by the RNC and state party was too close to the election for a ruling to be made. show more
October 7, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Please Don’t Do What Elon Musk’s Mother Said.

Maye Musk, mother of tech billionaire Elon Musk, attracted attention over the weekend for posting controversial advice regarding the 2024 election on social media. On Saturday, she shared a message on her son’s X platform suggesting—likely sarcastically—that Republicans should commit voter fraud to even the field with Democrats in Georgia. Additionally, she encouraged supporters of President Donald J. Trump to use false identities to cast multiple ballots at various polling places on election day.

“The Democrats have given us another option,” Elon Musk’s mother wrote. “You don’t have to register to vote. On Election Day, have 10 fake names, go to 10 polling booths and vote 10 times. That’s 100 votes, and it’s not illegal. Maybe we should work the system too.”

Such tactics would be a federal crime. According to 52 USC 10307, using false identities to vote multiple times illegally is punishable with heavy fines and imprisonment for each violation.

Earlier this year, the mayoral race in Bridgeport, Connecticut, had to be re-run for a third time after the prior two elections were found to be tainted by ballot stuffing—a similar illegal tactic to the one advocated by Maye Musk. Late last year, three Democrat officials in their respective states faced charges of tampering with votes, casting fraudulent mail-in ballots, and ballot stuffing.

Maye Musk’s post was tagged with a Community Note bluntly emphasizing the illegality of her suggestion. “This is, in fact, illegal,” it states.

Image by Elekes Andor.

show less
Maye Musk, mother of tech billionaire Elon Musk, attracted attention over the weekend for posting controversial advice regarding the 2024 election on social media. On Saturday, she shared a message on her son's X platform suggesting—likely sarcastically—that Republicans should commit voter fraud to even the field with Democrats in Georgia. Additionally, she encouraged supporters of President Donald J. Trump to use false identities to cast multiple ballots at various polling places on election day. show more
arizona
October 4, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

AZ Uncovers Further 120K Voters Without Citizenship Proof.

Arizona’s Secretary of State has announced the discovery of an additional 120,000 registered voters who lack documentary proof of citizenship, bringing the total to 218,000. The extensive error is attributed to data coding issues involving driver’s license information between the Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division and the state voter registration databases.

The massive voter registration error was first identified last month when approximately 97,000 voters were found to be listed as full-ballot voters without providing the required citizenship documentation for state elections. Arizona requires those registering to vote in state-level elections to provide documentary proof of citizenship (DPOC). Consequently, if a voter cannot provide the required information, they’re designated as only being allowed to cast a federal election ballot.

According to the state investigation into the database issue, approximately 79,000 registered Republicans and 61,000 Democrats are impacted. An additional 76,000 voters who are registered under other political parties are also affected.

Adrian Fontes, Arizona’s Democratic Secretary of State, stressed that the individuals impacted “have lived in the state for decades and have attested under penalty of perjury that they are U.S. citizens.” According to the Secretary of State’s office, those affected can still participate in November’s elections with full-ballot rights—citing a recent Arizona Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Both Fontes and the Arizona Republican Party urged the court to stop an effort by Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer to restrict the voters to federal-only ballots.

In response, Arizona Republican Party Chair Gina Swoboda criticized the handling of the situation, accusing Fontes of misleading the public and failing to fulfill his duties. She demands transparency and immediate disclosure of the affected voter data to all county recorders.

show less
Arizona's Secretary of State has announced the discovery of an additional 120,000 registered voters who lack documentary proof of citizenship, bringing the total to 218,000. The extensive error is attributed to data coding issues involving driver's license information between the Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division and the state voter registration databases. show more
October 4, 2024
Election Integrity
Lawfare

Senior Citizen Jailed for 9 Years for Letting Public Examine Voting Machines.

Tina Peters, a former county clerk in Colorado in her late sixties, has received a nine-year prison sentence for allowing 2020 election skeptics to replicate Dominion voting machine hard drives to check for evidence of fraud. Peters was convicted in August of multiple charges, including official misconduct. The charges stem from her use of another person’s security badge to allow access to Mesa County election equipment by an individual connected to election skeptic Mike Lindell.

The “breach” led to the online dissemination of sensitive data, necessitating the replacement of the county’s voting equipment—with more Dominion machines. During closing arguments, prosecutor Jessica Drake characterized Peters as “a fox guarding the henhouse,” noting her responsibility to secure the election equipment and alleging she failed to do so.

Despite the verdict, Peters insists she is innocent and was trying to safeguard election integrity. “It is with a heavy heart that I hear the vile accusations and anger levied against me,” she told the court, requesting probation instead of imprisonment.

Twenty-first Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett has instead opted for a harsh prison sentence. “I’m convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” Barrett said of Peters, calling the senior citizen “as defiant a defendant as this court has seen.”

Following Peters’s “breach,” lawmakers in Colorado passed the so-called Colorado Election Security Act (SB22-153), which contains unrelated provisions that effectively outlaw the hand-counting of ballots in favor of mandatory machine counting. The National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) requested this anti-election integrity measure to stop the “election denial world” from requesting hand counts to verify the validity of vote counts.

show less
Tina Peters, a former county clerk in Colorado in her late sixties, has received a nine-year prison sentence for allowing 2020 election skeptics to replicate Dominion voting machine hard drives to check for evidence of fraud. Peters was convicted in August of multiple charges, including official misconduct. The charges stem from her use of another person's security badge to allow access to Mesa County election equipment by an individual connected to election skeptic Mike Lindell. show more
October 1, 2024
Election 2024
Election Integrity

Abortion Ballot Measure Would Also Establish Noncitizen Voting Rights.

A broadly worded New York state ballot measure could enshrine voting rights in the state constitution for noncitizens even though it is ostensibly aimed at protecting abortions. Proposition 1, known as the Equal Rights Amendment, would guarantee the right to abortion in the state constitution. However, there is mounting concern the measure’s broad anti-discrimination provision could lead to significant unintended consequences.

The proposed amendment states, “No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws of this state,” and lists protections regardless of “race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, creed [or], religion, or sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy.” According to critics, the inclusion of “national origin” could extend protections and potentially voting rights to noncitizens, including illegal immigrants.

Westchester County-based constitutional lawyer Bobbi Anne Cox, who is spearheading a campaign opposed to Proposition 1, argues the anti-discrimination amendment is so broadly worded that it equates noncitizens with citizens in terms of legal protections.

“It covers anybody. That includes people who came here illegally and broke our laws,” she emphasized, suggesting it is a “Trojan horse of epic proportions.”

Additionally, Cox notes the measure could result in taxpayers having to cover even more services for illegal immigrants than they already are—further ballooning state and local budgets.

Republican pollster John McLaughlin agrees with Cox, suggesting that voter support for Prop 1 decreases when they learn of its broader implications, said to include allowing transgenders to compete in women’s sports and share female locker rooms. He described the ballot measure as a “radical wish list.”

Image by rchristie/Ryan.

show less
A broadly worded New York state ballot measure could enshrine voting rights in the state constitution for noncitizens even though it is ostensibly aimed at protecting abortions. Proposition 1, known as the Equal Rights Amendment, would guarantee the right to abortion in the state constitution. However, there is mounting concern the measure's broad anti-discrimination provision could lead to significant unintended consequences. show more