Monday, September 15, 2025

Klaus Schwab Out as World Economic Forum Chairman.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), announced this week he will step down from his role as chairman after leading the organization for five decades.

👥 Who’s Involved: Klaus Schwab, the WEF board of trustees, and CEO Børge Brende. Departing executives also include chief legal officer Nicola Port and technology head Malte Godbersen.

📍 Where & When: Schwab plans to leave his position with the WEF based in Switzerland, with the process of finding a new chairperson expected to conclude by January 2027.

💬 Key Quote: “This period of reflection has been grounded in a desire not just to do things differently, but to do them better,” said WEF CEO Børge Brende.

⚠️ Impact: Schwab’s departure signifies significant leadership changes within the WEF following an investigation of workplace bias allegations, though those claims were not verified.

IN FULL:

Klaus Schwab, the founder of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF), has announced his decision to step down from his chairman role after 50 years at the helm. The organization, based in Switzerland, is beginning the search for a new chairman, with plans to complete this process by January 2027.

This development follows an internal examination by the WEF board into allegations of racism and gender bias within the organization’s work environment—allegations that Schwab and the Forum have consistently denied. The investigation did not substantiate the claims against Schwab, though it prompted discussions on organizational leadership and workplace culture.

Schwab had initially announced in May last year his intention to transition from executive chairman to non-executive chairman, and this week’s announcement formalizes his eventual full departure. Schwab, widely recognized for his work on the anti-human “Great Reset,” has been a prominent figure in global discussions, attracting attention from various political perspectives, particularly conservatives who view him as emblematic of globalism.

In addition to Schwab’s announcement, the WEF’s other leadership changes include the exits of chief legal officer Nicola Port and head of technology and digital services Malte Godbersen.

The World Economic Forum is an unelected, unaccountable gathering of leaders from across governments and major corporations who convene multiple times a year around the world, most notably at Davos in Switzerland for an annual globalist conflab.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Pro-Life Activist Violently Attacked During NYC Interview.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: A pro-life activist, Savannah Craven, was assaulted while conducting street interviews.

👥 Who’s Involved: Savannah Craven, a pro-life activist from Live Action, and an unidentified pro-abortion supporter.

📍 Where & When: The incident occurred in Harlem, New York City on a Thursday.

💬 Key Quote: “I was just assaulted in Harlem interviewing people on the street. In cop car. Heading to hospital. Updates soon. ABORTION SUPPORTERS ARE VIOLENT!” – Savannah Craven.

IN FULL:

Savannah Craven, affiliated with the pro-life organization Live Action, was allegedly attacked while interviewing individuals on the streets of Harlem about Planned Parenthood on Thursday. Craven, who was posing questions about the operations of Planned Parenthood, encountered an individual supporting abortion. The interaction reportedly turned violent after the individual realized Craven’s pro-life stance.

Craven was subsequently struck in the face multiple times, leaving her injured. This altercation was documented through photographs and a video shared on social media by Craven’s associate, Adam Francisco. The video indicated that Craven was inside an NYPD vehicle, seeking her attacker at the scene of the incident.

The attack happened amid heightened national debate surrounding abortion, following recent federal moves to limit funding for Planned Parenthood and similar organizations.

The incident follows weeks of violence by the political left discussions around controversial topics like abortion. Authorities are currently investigating the incident and searching for the individual responsible for the assault on Craven.

Craven stated she is receiving medical attention for her injuries and has called for awareness regarding violence against pro-life individuals.

show less
PULSE POINTS: show more

US Naval Academy Drops 400 Titles from Library Collection Amid Bid to Excise DEI.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Nearly 400 books were removed from the U.S. Naval Academy’s library following a directive from the defense secretary’s office to eliminate materials promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.

👥 Who’s Involved: U.S. Naval Academy, the office of the Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, Pentagon officials, Lt. Gen. Tony Bauernfeind, and other military academies.

📍 Where & When: The removal occurred at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. The directive was given late last week, and the removal was completed by Monday.

💬 Key Quote: Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, stated, “All service academies are fully committed to executing and implementing President Trump’s executive orders.”

⚠️ Impact: The action aligns with efforts to remove diversity-related content from federal entities, raising concerns among lawmakers and citizens about the elimination of historical content.

IN FULL:

The U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis removed around 400 books from its library after being instructed by the defense secretary‘s office to remove materials promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This decision aligns with ongoing Trump administration initiatives to scrap such content.

Officials at the academy were tasked late last week with conducting a library review, evaluating around 900 books. The academy swiftly moved to eliminate almost 400 titles by Monday, ahead of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s visit.

A Pentagon representative, Sean Parnell, indicated, “All service academies are fully committed to executing and implementing President Trump’s executive orders.”

The directive impacted not only the Naval Academy but also prompted curriculum reassessments at the Air Force Academy in Colorado and West Point in New York. Due to their collegiate status, these institutions had previously been exempt from DEI-related executive orders targeting K-12 education.

Previously, President Donald J. Trump’s administration scrapped a bizarre $2.3 million virtual reality DEI program for U.S. military personnel. The program, which used a VR avatar, attempted to simulate difficult conversations and teach de-escalation strategies.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Support Swells for Trump’s America First Trade Strategy.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: President Donald J. Trump announced a new set of tariffs aimed at reversing globalization’s impact on the U.S. industrial sector, introducing a universal 10 percent tariff and higher tariffs on countries with their own punishing tariff and non-tariff barriers against the U.S.

👥 Who’s Involved: The policy has garnered bipartisan support, including backing from Democrat Rep. Jared Golden and numerous industry leaders.

📍 Where & When: The announcement was made in the United States following Trump’s recent speech on economic policy.

💬 Key Quote: Rep. Jared Golden praised the tariff plan as “a good start to erasing our unsustainable trade deficits.”

⚠️ Impact: The tariffs are expected to boost American manufacturing, protect jobs, and correct trade imbalances.

IN FULL:

President Donald J. Trump’s move to protect American businesses and workers from unfair trade has received widespread approval from various sectors, reflecting a significant shift in policy-making. Democratic Representative Jared Golden expressed his support, hailing the President’s tariff agenda as a necessary move to address economic challenges posed by globalization. Golden said President Trump’s tariffs align with proposals in the BUILT USA Act, underscoring the urgency of tackling trade imbalances and protecting American jobs.

The policy has also resonated with industry leaders. Zach Mottl, Chairman of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, said the Trump tariffs are “a game-changing shift that prioritizes American manufacturing, protects working-class jobs, and safeguards our economic security from adversaries like China.”

Philip K. Bell, President of the Steel Manufacturers Association, said Trump’s tariffs “have already started creating American jobs and bolstering the domestic steel industry.” He cited recent investments, including Hyundai Steel’s new plant in Louisiana, as evidence of the policy’s potential.

Scott Paul, President of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, said America’s “hardworking men and women have seen unfair trade cut the ground from beneath their feet for decades,” calling Trump’s tariffs a “necessary step.”

Analysts indicate that correcting trade disparities and strengthening domestic production could redefine America’s role in the global market. Supporters argue that the tariffs will ultimately lead to fairer trade deals and bolster the American workforce.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump to Host Bukele at White House for Strategic Talks.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: President Donald J. Trump invited El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele to the White House in a formal letter shared by Bukele.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald Trump, President Nayib Bukele, and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem.

📍 Where & When: The White House, Washington, D.C. The invitation is set for April 14.

💬 Key Quote: “Your support of my efforts to combat illegal immigration is greatly appreciated,” stated Trump.

⚠️ Impact: The invitation highlights cooperation between the U.S. and El Salvador in dealing with border security and gang issues, showing joint efforts against illegal activities.

IN FULL:

President Donald J. Trump has extended an invitation to El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele for a visit to the White House. The April 14 invitation was outlined in a letter, which Bukele shared on the social media platform X.

The invitation acknowledges Bukele’s participation in U.S. initiatives to combat illegal immigration. It also highlights his administration’s use of the newly built prison facilities for housing criminals from notorious gangs such as Tren de Aragua. Trump praised Bukele’s handling of these security matters as a model of leadership.

“Your support of my efforts to combat illegal immigration is greatly appreciated,” Trump told Bukele. “For far too long, our southern border has been an open door. With the assistance of friends like you, we have made great progress in protecting Americans from illegal border activity,” Trump said. Bukele responded with appreciation for Trump’s words, emphasizing continued cooperation.

This follows a joint military operation that resulted in the deportation of 17 dangerous gang criminals from the United States. According to Bukele, these individuals are high-profile offenders, including six charged with crimes against minors.

President Trump has faced push-back from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, who has tried to block deportation flights of gang members. Late last month, President Trump announced he would be taking Boasberg to the U.S. Supreme Court to appeal Boasberg’s order barring the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport gang members.

READ:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Amazon Enters TikTok Acquisition Fray as Sale Deadline Nears.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The U.S. set an April 5 deadline for TikTok to sell or face a ban, with Amazon entering the bidding.

👥 Who’s Involved: Amazon, the Trump administration, ByteDance (TikTok’s Chinese parent company), AppLovin, Oracle, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍 Where & When: The situation is unfolding in the U.S., with a key deadline on April 5.

💬 Key Quote: President Trump mentioned there are multiple potential buyers and expressed a desire to keep TikTok operational.

⚠️ Impact: The ban on TikTok could proceed if no sale is agreed upon and approved by both the Trump administration and China.

IN FULL:

A number of Big Tech giants are intensifying their efforts to acquire the social media app TikTok as the deadline for its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest itself from the company or face its banning in the United States looms. While Oracle has long been considered the most likely serious buyer to acquire TikTok, the multinational software company may now face significant competition, with Amazon showing interest in purchasing the app. President Donald J. Trump has mandated that TikTok must be sold to a non-Chinese company by April 5, or the app will be banned from being downloaded in the United States due to national security concerns.

It is believed that Amazon has submitted a formal letter to President Trump declaring intent to enter the acquisition race. However, while Oracle and Amazon stand out as having the requisite capital to make significant bids to acquire TikTok, several other potential buyers could still make a last-minute push for ownership.

Notably, mobile tech firm AppLovin has placed a bid to acquire TikTok. Meanwhile, Kevin O’Leary—a Canadian businessman and host of the popular Shark Tank reality show—joined with real estate developer and Project Liberty founder Frank McCourt to make a purchase offer this past January.

President Trump recently stated that he would prefer TikTok to remain available to U.S. users, suggesting he hopes one of the potential buyers will be able to reach a deal with ByteDance to acquire the app. Additionally, Trump indicated that he may extend the timeframe for TikTok’s sale if negotiations need more time.

Image by Steve Jurvetson.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Even the Globalist ‘Economist’ Magazine Says France’s Le Pen Shouldn’t Be Banned from Office.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The globalist magazine The Economist has defended Marine Le Pen’s right to run for office, recently stripped away by a court ruling.

👥 Who’s Involved: The Economist, Marine Le Pen, French courts.

📍 Where & When: The article appeared in The Economist on April 1.

💬 Key Quote: “The aim should be to punish the offender without also punishing French democracy,” the magazine argues.

⚠️ Impact: One of the major media outlets for globalists, the stance could reflect a shift against the lawfare deployed against populists in recent years.

IN FULL:

The globalist magazine The Economist has come out to defend populist French politician Marine Le Pen, who has been barred from running for office in France for five years and placed under house arrest for two years. The sentences came after Le Pen and several other members of her party, the National Rally, were found guilty of supposedly misusing European Union (EU) funds while serving as Members of the European Parliament (MEPs).

The magazine questions whether Le Pen should be barred from running for office in the upcoming 2027 presidential election, noting that she is the current leader in the polls.

“The danger of courts aggressively sentencing politicians is that both the law and the courts become seen as partisan. Judiciaries rely on citizens accepting verdicts with which they disagree,” the magazine warns. Barely half, just 56 percent, of the French public believe Le Pen was treated in an unbiased manner.

While the magazine argues that Le Pen should serve two years of house arrest, it states that she should be allowed to run for president in 2027. “The aim should be to punish the offender without also punishing French democracy,” the magazine states.

The court ruling to ban Le Pen from running for office comes after she and other National Rally members were found guilty of embezzling European Union funds by using EU-funded parliamentary assistants to perform domestic party work. Le Pen argued that the charges were bogus lawfare, as parliamentary assistants are “political assistants to elected officials, political by definition.”

Many observers, including liberal journalists, have noted that parliamentary assistants performing political work is commonplace in the European Parliament, meaning Le Pen was almost certainly singled out for her political views.

Image by Blandine Le Cain.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

DOGE Data: Almost 50% of National Jobs Cuts are DC Govt Workers.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Layoffs announced by employers in the U.S. increased significantly in March—but almost half are Washington, D.C. bureaucrats, according to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

👥 Who’s Involved: Federal workers and contractors, DOGE, and DOGE frontman Elon Musk.

📍 Where & When: These developments occurred in Washington D.C. during March.

💬 Key Quote: Andrew Challenger of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas noted, “Job cut announcements were dominated last month by Department of Government Efficiency plans to eliminate positions in the federal government.”

⚠️ Impact: With 497,052 layoffs in the first three months of the year, this represents the highest first-quarter total since 2009, with significant implications for federal agencies and leftist non-profits.

IN FULL:

U.S. employers announced layoffs in March at levels unprecedented since the pandemic-induced recession—but this was driven largely by sizable cuts among federal workers and contractors. Data released by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas on Thursday indicated a 60 percent surge in planned job reductions, amounting to 275,240 positions last month. This figure marks the highest since May 2020, positioning it as the third-largest monthly total recorded.

These reductions were significantly concentrated in Washington, D.C., attributed mainly to the federal government sector. Over the past two months, approximately 280,253 planned federal worker and contractor layoffs have impacted 27 agencies as the Trump administration seeks to eliminate waste and inefficiency and bring federal spending under control. The ripple effect of terminating federal aid or contracts further contributed to 4,429 job cuts, notably affecting non-profits—often engaged in leftist activism—and health-oriented organizations, possibly due to the administration’s efforts to defund abortions and transgenderism.

Andrew Challenger of Challenger, Gray & Christmas commented, “Job cut announcements were dominated last month by Department of Government Efficiency plans to eliminate positions in the federal government.”

Judicial orders have facilitated the reinstatement of around 24,000 workers. Reports indicate a significant reshuffle within federal ranks is ongoing, documenting 3,972 rehired policymakers as part of March’s hiring plans.

An anticipated governmental employment report suggests an addition of 135,000 nonfarm payroll jobs for March, maintaining an unemployment rate of 4.1 percent.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Obama Judge DENIES Bid to Strengthen Election Integrity.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg ruled to dismiss a case challenging Georgia’s electronic voting system, citing a lack of standing, despite recognizing substantial concerns about the system’s security and administration.

👥 Who’s Involved: The ruling affects plaintiffs including the Coalition for Good Governance and various Georgia voters. The case, Curling v. Raffensperger, has been ongoing since 2017.

📍 Where & When: The decision was issued in the Northern District of Georgia on a late Monday.

💬 Key Quote: “Plaintiffs lack standing to pursue their claims because neither of these asserted injuries constitute an invasion of a legally protected interest under governing precedent,” Judge Totenberg wrote.

⚠️ Impact: The dismissal leaves Georgia’s use of the Ballot Marking Device system in place despite security concerns, while plaintiffs consider exploring an appeal.

IN FULL:

In Georgia, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg has dismissed a long-standing case aiming to move the state’s election system to hand-marked paper ballots. The case, Curling v. Raffensperger, initiated in 2017, sought to replace the electronic voting system currently in use, citing risks regarding the security and accuracy of the Ballot Marking Device (BMD) system. The Barack Obama-appointed judge’s decision, issued late on April 1, found the plaintiffs lacked legal standing—despite acknowledging significant concerns about the electronic voting system’s administration and security.

“Plaintiffs lack standing to pursue their claims because neither of these asserted injuries constitute an invasion of a legally protected interest under governing precedent,” Judge Totenberg said.

The plaintiffs in this case included the Coalition for Good Governance and several Georgia voters. They have argued that the existing system, which relies on a QR code to tally votes, does not allow voters to verify that the system recorded their intentions accurately.

The QR code used on ballots is not readable to voters, prompting concerns over the integrity of the vote tabulation. Judge Totenberg, referencing the plaintiffs’ injuries as not legally actionable, stated that these concerns do not invade a legally protected interest.

A major point of contention for the plaintiffs was the system’s vulnerability to potential manipulation. Dr. J. Alex Halderman, a computer science expert, provided testimony during the trial demonstrating how the system could be exploited, including altering QR codes to change voter selections and accessing the system via simple physical manipulation.

Despite these concerns, the ruling affirms the use of Georgia’s electronic voting system for the time being, leaving the future of the voting system’s security unresolved.

The ruling comes just days after the Trump administration and Attorney General Pam Bondi dropped a lawsuit against electoral reform in Georgia, initiated by the former Biden government. That lawsuit had demanded that Georgia scrap its voting laws passed after the 2020 elections. This included measures such as stricter voter ID requirements for mail-in ballots and more.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

DOGE Employee Takes Helm at U.S. Institute of Peace, Court Filing Reveals.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A court filing revealed that a Trump administration official from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is overseeing the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP).

👥 Who’s Involved: Nate Cavanaugh, an official of the Department of Government Efficiency, alongside board members from the U.S. Institute of Peace.

📍 Where & When: The developments were filed in federal court, with a status hearing conducted on Tuesday.

💬 Key Quote: “The deal is no longer merely ‘proposed’ but done, rendering plaintiffs’ requested relief moot as to that property,” said Judge Beryl Howell.

⚠️ Impact: The property of the U.S. Institute of Peace is in the process of being transferred to the General Services Administration, a move which could conclude despite judicial intervention efforts.

IN FULL:

Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) official Nate Cavanaugh has been appointed to replace the U.S. Institute of Peace’s temporary president, according to a recent court filing. The appointment, authorized by two of the institute’s board members, was revealed during a status hearing before U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell on Tuesday.

Established by Congress in 1984, the U.S. Institute of Peace has operated as a quasi-non-governmental organization (NGO) for decades—despite it ostensibly falling under the authority of the federal government’s executive branch. In February, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order mandating the institute downsize its activities to a “statutory minimum.” However, the organization’s far-left leadership dismissed the order, arguing that the institute is a congressionally chartered NGO and not technically part of the executive branch.

The rejection of Trump’s executive order resulted in the institute’s leadership and staff being removed by police last month, with the Trump White House appointing an acting president to oversee its operations. In response to President Trump’s actions, the former leadership of the U.S. Institute of Peace filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming the Trump administration had engaged in an illegal attempt to seize control of the institute. The filing asked Judge Howell to halt the reorganization in order to stop what they allege is a “takeover by force.”

Despite the litigation, Cavanaugh has begun transferring the institute’s property to the General Services Administration (GSA), the government agency that oversees federal contracts and assets. Notably, the GSA has already terminated several federal leases at the urging of DOGE.

Tuesday’s status hearing regarding the request to halt the institute’s reorganization lasted for several hours. Judge Howell eventually ruled that the former leadership’s claims to the institute’s property were moot. “The deal is no longer merely ‘proposed’ but done, rendering plaintiffs’ requested relief moot as to that property,” the judge determined.

Image via USIP.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more