Thursday, April 25, 2024

UK Muslims Celebrate Eid by Rioting, Attacking Cops.

Disturbances erupted in Southall, West London, during celebrations marking the end of Ramadan‘s fast, Eid. The usually peaceful area noted for its high South Asian populace was gripped by chaos as celebrants attacked police officers.

Observations from images circulating on social media showed large crowds gathered, with objects such as bricks, pieces of wood, and bottles being hurled at police, some of whom were forced to put on riot gear to deal with the unrest.

“[B]efore midnight a small number of young people — who we do not believe to be from the area — became involved in sporadic anti-social behavior, including climbing onto bus stops,” said Chief Superintendent Sean Wilson, in charge of policing the Ealing Borough in which Southall is located.

“As officers attempted to speak to these people about their safety, they were surrounded by a crowd, again many of whom were not from Southall, before items, including bottles, were thrown towards them,” Wilson said. “Fortunately, neither members of the public, nor the officers were injured.”

Despite the mass violence, only one arrest was made.

Rory Geoghegan, founder of the Public Safety Foundation, noted that the incident appeared to be followed by near-total silence from authorities. “Concerning that there seems to be a total black-out from @MetPoliceUK and local politicians in relation to Southall,” Geoghegan wrote on social media. “Where is the condemnation? Where is the commitment to apprehend those involved?”

The UK has struggled to integrate its large Muslim population. “No-go zones” are said to be a serious problem in the country, and Muslims account for nearly 20 percent of the prison population despite being only 6.5 percent of the general population. A recent study found that almost 50 percent of British Muslims are sympathetic towards the Hamas terrorist organization.

show less
Disturbances erupted in Southall, West London, during celebrations marking the end of Ramadan's fast, Eid. The usually peaceful area noted for its high South Asian populace was gripped by chaos as celebrants attacked police officers. show more
Source
Discuss

USPS Plans Stamp Price Hike After Biden Ditches Trump Admin Reforms.

The United States Postal Service (USPS) is seeking another price increase after raising the cost of a first-class stamp three times in less than two years. Should the proposed hike be approved by the Postal Regulatory Commission, customers will pay 73 cents for a stamp, reflecting about a 7 percent increase on all forms of postage.

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, appointed by former President Donald Trump in May 2020, has made multiple attempts to reform the USPS and put it on a more sound fiscal footing. However, Congressional Democrats and later President Joe Biden hampered the reform efforts. Several lawsuits by environmental groups and progressive activists forced DeJoy to abandon a proposal to bolster the postal service’s fleet of vehicles with cheaper, gasoline-powered vehicles. The Postal Service was instead forced to acquire more expensive electric and hybrid delivery trucks.

Pressure from Congressional Democrats forced DeJoy to abandon changes to the postal service’s overtime policies and the elimination of lower-volume mail collection boxes found on city streets. The Postmaster General and the Trump Treasury Department repeatedly warned Congress that without significant changes, USPS would need to explore increasing its revenue by raising stamp prices and the cost of other services.

The stamp price plan announced on Tuesday raises the cost of first-class stamps, 1-ounce letters to 69 cents, international ounce-size letters to $1.65, and postcards to $1.65. Mailing domestic postcards will increase to 56 cents. The Postal Service hopes to implement these changes by July.

The USPS reported a $6.5 billion net loss in 2023 amidst falling revenue and usage of first-class mail, which reached its lowest level since 1968.

show less
The United States Postal Service (USPS) is seeking another price increase after raising the cost of a first-class stamp three times in less than two years. Should the proposed hike be approved by the Postal Regulatory Commission, customers will pay 73 cents for a stamp, reflecting about a 7 percent increase on all forms of postage. show more
Source
Discuss

WATCH: Biden Says Presidential Legacy is Ending War in Vietnam (Which Ended 48 Years Ago).

Joe Biden appeared to indicate that he wants his presidential legacy to be that he reduced the prospect of war in Vietnam.

Biden’s comments came during an interview on Mexican-American network TelevisaUnivision. “Well, I hope the legacy is that I kept my word that I said that the reason I was running was to help change the life of ordinary people and reduce the prospect of war, because of Vietnam.”

The Vietnam War ended 48 years ago, in 1975, just over two years after Biden first assumed his seat in the U.S. Senate. When Biden was first campaigning for the Senate in 1972, he did not run on an anti-war platform. In his own words, he was “not big on flak jackets and tie-dye shirts” and professed a “lack of moral outrage” about the war.

The octogenarian president has faced increasingly widespread concerns over his mental faculties. Just this week, Biden appeared to forget his own name during a speech in Washington, D.C.

show less
Joe Biden appeared to indicate that he wants his presidential legacy to be that he reduced the prospect of war in Vietnam. show more
Source
Discuss

Ukraine Now Buying Chinese Drones, American Ones Keep Breaking.

The war in Ukraine has exposed significant deficiencies in the American drone industry, with glitchy, expensive drones made in the U.S. failing to meet expectations and being supplanted by off-the-shelf Chinese products.

Silicon Valley firm Skydio is among the U.S. firms whose drones have fallen flat on the Ukrainian battlefield, with the Wall Street Journal reporting “hundreds of its best drones… flew off course and were lost” after running into Russian jammers.

“The general reputation for every class of U.S. drone in Ukraine is that they don’t work as well as other systems,” admitted Skydio chief executive Adam Bry, confessing his product was “not a very successful platform on the front lines.”

Ukraine’s drone supplier of choice is Chinese firm SZ DJI Technology — which, officially, does not even want its products to be used in war zones, saying it “absolutely deplores and condemns the use of its products to cause harm anywhere in the world.”

Embarrassingly for the U.S. government, DJI has been banned by the U.S. military, and Congress is weighing whether to ban it altogether – yet the firm is being bolstered by Ukrainian purchases funded at least in part of U.S. aid.

Ukraine’s burgeoning domestic drone industry also relies on Chinese parts.

The problems with U.S. drones are not only a national security weakness but also a loss for the U.S. economy, with Ukraine using up around 10,000 drones a month that might have come mainly from U.S. firms had they been more reliable.

show less
The war in Ukraine has exposed significant deficiencies in the American drone industry, with glitchy, expensive drones made in the U.S. failing to meet expectations and being supplanted by off-the-shelf Chinese products. show more
Source
Discuss

Another Boeing Whistleblower Steps Forward.

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is examining a whistleblower’s allegations that Boeing overlooked safety and quality concerns in the manufacturing of its 787 and 777 jets. Last year, Boeing disclosed that some 787 airplanes had irregularly sized shims and certain aircraft had areas that failed to meet skin-flatness specifications.

Engineer Sam Salehpour, the whistleblower, claimed he faced retaliation — in the form of threats and exclusion from meetings — for spotting engineering issues affecting the jets’ structural integrity. Salehpour’s lawyers stated he recognized engineering shortcuts that placed stress on airplane joints, resulting in drilling debris between essential joints on over 1,000 planes.

Salehpour also told reporters that he observed serious issues with misalignment in the production of the 777 widebody jet. “I literally saw people jumping on the pieces of the airplane to get them to align,” he said.

An FAA agency source confirmed it has interacted with Salehpour. The agency also affirmed the importance of whistleblowers in maintaining safety standards. “Voluntary reporting without fear of reprisal is a critical component in aviation safety,” it said. “We strongly encourage everyone in the aviation industry to share information. We thoroughly investigate all reports.”

Boeing continues to face scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigating potential infringements of a 2021 agreement protecting the company from prosecution following fatal MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019.

A recent FAA audit of Boeing’s manufacturing processes found nearly 100 instances of noncompliance. Another Boeing whistleblower, John Barnett, was found dead in March, with authorities ruling his death a suicide. However, shortly before his death, Barnett warned a friend that “if anything happens to me, it’s not suicide.”

show less
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is examining a whistleblower’s allegations that Boeing overlooked safety and quality concerns in the manufacturing of its 787 and 777 jets. Last year, Boeing disclosed that some 787 airplanes had irregularly sized shims and certain aircraft had areas that failed to meet skin-flatness specifications. show more
Source
Discuss

50 Pro-Hamas Protesters Arrested for Occupying U.S. Senate Cafeteria.

A group of pro-Hams protesters staged a demonstration inside a U.S. Senate cafeteria on Tuesday, demanding the American government back a ceasefire in Gaza. The protestors, comprised at least in part by members of Christians for a Free Palestine, chanted: “Congress and their staff will not eat until Gaza eats.” Demonstrators also displayed banners reading “Send food, not bombs” and “Break bread, not bodies.”

More than 50 of the protestors were detained and arrested by the U.S. Capitol Police after they stormed through a Senate office building and occupied the cafeteria. The demonstration briefly caused the dining hall frequented by lawmakers and their staff – as well as guests and tourists — to be shut down.

The calls among Democrat and progressive activists for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas have hit new highs following an accidental Israeli military strike that resulted in the deaths of several humanitarian aid workers. President Joe Biden has faced internal backlash within his party over appearing overly supportive of Israel and its military operation aimed at eliminating the Hamas terrorist group following their barbaric October 7, 2023 attack on the Jewish state.

Late last year, pro-Hamas demonstrators stormed the Cannon House Office Building in a moment reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Several protestors were arrested for assaulting officers after clashing with U.S. Capitol Police. Meanwhile, outside the Capitol building, Rep. Rashida Tlaib urged on the demonstrators while attacking President Biden’s pro-Israel stance — claiming that Arab-American and Muslim voters would not forget his betrayal.

During the 2024 Democrat presidential primary, Biden faced several significant protest votes from the Muslim community and progressive activists in states like Michigan and Washington. Additionally, Arab-American and Muslim leaders in the U.S. have balked at efforts by the President’s re-election campaign to try and mend bridges.

show less
A group of pro-Hams protesters staged a demonstration inside a U.S. Senate cafeteria on Tuesday, demanding the American government back a ceasefire in Gaza. The protestors, comprised at least in part by members of Christians for a Free Palestine, chanted: "Congress and their staff will not eat until Gaza eats." Demonstrators also displayed banners reading "Send food, not bombs" and "Break bread, not bodies." show more
Source
Discuss

Rand Paul: ‘Smoking Gun’ Ties Fauci to Wuhan Lab Creation of COVID.

Sen. Rand Paul says a 2018 grant proposal seeking funding to experiment with a COVID-19-type virus is the “smoking gun” linking Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Health to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Following recent disclosures by a Marine Corps whistleblower, Senator Paul flagged a 2018 grant proposal linked to 15 federal agencies that could have enabled the Wuhan Institute to develop a COVID-19-like virus.

“We only found out about this from a whistleblower — nobody else in government ever informed us, including Anthony Fauci,” Paul said. He alleges the “smoking gun” ties him and the NIH to the 2018 grant proposal, leading to the possibility that NIH and NIAID were part of research that could have potentially resulted in the COVID-19 virus.

The grant proposal, labeled “DEFUSE Project,” was submitted to the Department of Defense’s research agency, DARPA, and reportedly incorporated NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Montana, yielding suspicions of Fauci’s knowledge and involvement. Paul has called for more information from each agency involved by April 23.

The grant proposal’s existence suggests Fauci may have lied directly to Congress. “Sen. Paul, I have never lied before Congress and I do not retract that statement. This paper that you are referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain-of-function,” Fauci said during a 2021 Senate hearing. “Sen. Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly.”

While the DEFUSE project was not federally funded, according to Paul, Fauci and others were allegedly aware of Wuhan lab’s continuance in related microbial research. This brings into sharper focus the early insinuations of COVID-19 being a laboratory leak, and the subsequent dismissal of the hypothesis by prominent voices like Fauci, who derided it as a conspiracy theory.

show less
Sen. Rand Paul says a 2018 grant proposal seeking funding to experiment with a COVID-19-type virus is the "smoking gun" linking Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Health to the COVID-19 pandemic. show more
Source
Discuss

Jack Smith Blasted for ‘Failure’ to Address Opposing Arguments.

Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over DOJ special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump over allegations he mishandled classified documents, chided the Biden government attorney multiple times for failing to respond to arguments made by opposing parties in an April 9 court filing. While Judge Cannon agreed to Smith’s motion asking the names of witnesses in the trial be redacted, she accused the special counsel at least eight times in her ruling of having failed to respond to objections raised by a coalition of press organizations who weighed in against Smith’s motion.

“The Special Counsel had two opportunities to raise these arguments and failed to do so in both instances. The Special Counsel’s initial Seal Request failed to offer a governing legal framework or any factual support for the relief sought,” Cannon wrote in her ruling. She continued: “Later, in response to the Press Coalition’s Motion, the Special Counsel failed to engage with — let alone refute — the Press Coalition’s argument that the First Amendment attached to the subject materials.”

The judge also criticized Smith for failing to comply with the court’s rules regarding the sealing of sensitive filings. “And this is to say nothing of the Special Counsel’s failure to comply with this District’s Local Rules on sealing, which the Court has emphasized repeatedly throughout this proceeding,” Judge Cannon wrote.

Prior to this most recent ruling, the relationship between the special counsel and Judge Cannon had already been under strain. Last week, the two tangled over the judge’s order requesting both Smith and attorneys for former President Donald Trump submit draft jury instructions, including arguments about the potential applicability of the Presidential Records Act. This latest episode suggests that the judge’s opinion of Smith may have fallen even further.

show less
Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over DOJ special counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of former President Donald Trump over allegations he mishandled classified documents, chided the Biden government attorney multiple times for failing to respond to arguments made by opposing parties in an April 9 court filing. While Judge Cannon agreed to Smith's motion asking the names of witnesses in the trial be redacted, she accused the special counsel at least eight times in her ruling of having failed to respond to objections raised by a coalition of press organizations who weighed in against Smith's motion. show more
Source
Discuss

Judge Reviewing Prince Harry’s Immigration Papers.

Prince Harry’s U.S. visa application has come under scrutiny following a Freedom of Information Act request for his immigration papers, fueled by questions around whether he was forthright about his abuse of drugs, including cannabis, cocaine, psychedelic mushrooms, and ayahuasca.

The Heritage Foundation has been seeking to discover whether Prince Harry, who detailed his use of narcotics, including on U.S. soil, in his memoir Spare, received preferential treatment from the government.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has now submitted to a court request for the royal’s papers so they can be privately reviewed.

With the DHS and the Heritage Foundation dueling over whether the papers are protected by privacy regulations or of sufficient public interest to be released, Judge Carl Nichols has mandated an in camera review to establish whether or not they should be exempt from release.

Heritage says it has brought the case “in the main because HRH [His Royal Highness] voluntarily — and for immense profit — admitted in writing to…  any number of controlled substance violations.”

Donald Trump has suggested Prince Harry could be deported under a second Trump administration if he lied on his visa application.

show less
Prince Harry's U.S. visa application has come under scrutiny following a Freedom of Information Act request for his immigration papers, fueled by questions around whether he was forthright about his abuse of drugs, including cannabis, cocaine, psychedelic mushrooms, and ayahuasca. show more
Source
Discuss

Media Continues to Peddle Federal Abortion Ban Conspiracies Despite Unequivocal Trump Statement.

The corporate media is continuing to peddle falsehoods aimed at riling up abortion activists in an attempt to swing November elections for Democrats, with a new article in the Washington Post claiming the practice could be banned at the federal level under a second Trump term, despite the 45th President making an unequivocal federalist argument just days ago.

In his initial statement on abortion, Trump confirmed his personal support for exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and when the life of the mother is at risk. He also expressed his belief that, constitutionally, the issue should be decided according to “the will of the people” on a state-by-state basis.

“People forget, fighting Roe v. Wade was, right from the beginning, all about bringing the Issue back to the States, pursuant to the 10th Amendment and States’ Rights. It wasn’t about anything else,” he wrote.

“We had a Great Victory, it’s back in the States where it belongs, and where everyone wanted it. The States will be making the decision,” he added.

“Republicans are now free to run for Office based on the Horrible Border, Inflation, Bad Economy, and the Death & Destruction of our Country!”

Trump has frequently stressed people must follow “their heart” on abortion. However, he has warned conservatives that they must “win elections” to have any positive impact on the country at all.

Pushing for total or near-total bans on abortion, which does not enjoy broad public support, is likely to frustrate this larger goal, according to most polling.

show less
The corporate media is continuing to peddle falsehoods aimed at riling up abortion activists in an attempt to swing November elections for Democrats, with a new article in the Washington Post claiming the practice could be banned at the federal level under a second Trump term, despite the 45th President making an unequivocal federalist argument just days ago. show more
Source
Discuss