❓WHAT HAPPENED: A second Air Force combat plane crashed in the Persian Gulf region, according to reports.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The lone pilot of the A-10 Warthog attack plane, U.S. officials.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Friday, near the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf region.
🎯IMPACT: Search-and-rescue operations are reportedly ongoing following a separate incident involving the downing of another plane by Iran.
IN FULL
According to two U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity, a second Air Force combat plane crashed in the Persian Gulf region on Friday. The officials said the A-10 Warthog attack plane’s lone pilot was safely rescued.
The crash is said to have happened near the Strait of Hormuz at roughly the same time an Air Force F-15E was reportedly shot down over Iran. Media reports claim that one crew member has been rescued in that incident, while search-and-rescue operations continue for a second airman, but these details are not officially confirmed.
Information on the A-10 crash, including its precise location and cause, is still limited, because officials have not formally confirmed the loss.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. federal immigration agents arrested Salah Sarsour, a Palestinian immigrant suspected of funding terror groups.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Salah Sarsour, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Sarsour’s attorneys.
📍WHEN & WHERE: April 2026, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
💬KEY QUOTE: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says Sarsour was previously “convicted for throwing Molotov cocktails at the homes of Israeli armed forces.”
🎯IMPACT: Sarsour’s arrest has sparked allegations that the U.S. is “doing the bidding” of Israel by silencing pro-Palestinian voices, but U.S. officials say he lied on his immigration forms and has links to fundraising for terror groups.
IN FULL
Salah Sarsour, president of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and Wisconsin’s largest mosque, has been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). U.S. officials say he is suspected of funding terrorist organizations.
Sarsour has lived in the United States as a legal permanent resident for more than 30 years. His supporters are demanding his release, arguing that he has been singled out because of his criticism of Israel. One of his attorneys, Munjed Ahmad, said, “Our government should not be doing the bidding of a foreign government,” adding that the arrest is intended to suppress pro-Palestinian voices.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says Sarsour was previously “convicted for throwing Molotov cocktails at the homes of Israeli armed forces,” although his attorneys claim a conviction related to this incident was known to U.S. authorities when he arrived in 1993.
DHS insists that Sarsour “lied on his immigration application,” adding: “This terrorist will remain in ICE custody pending removal proceedings.”
Today, @ICEgov arrested a Jordanian national with a prior conviction for THROWING A MOLOTOV COCKTAIL at the homes of Israeli Forces.
He lied on his immigration application and became a green card holder under President Clinton.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump rolled out his new federal budget proposal on Friday, which includes a record $1.5 trillion Department of War budget for the fiscal year 2027. This marks a nearly 40 percent increase over the fiscal year 2026 military spending.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the Department of War, and the U.S. Congress.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The fiscal year 2027 budget was released on Friday, April 3, 2026.
🎯IMPACT: The increase in military spending is likely to include $185 billion for President Trump’s Golden Dome missile defense system, as well as significant allocations of money for replenishing munition stockpiles that have been nearly depleted through the former Biden government’s transfer of weapons to Ukraine and the ongoing war with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump rolled out his new federal budget proposal on Friday, which includes a record $1.5 trillion Department of War budget for the fiscal year 2027. This marks a nearly 40 percent increase over the fiscal year 2026 military spending.
Last year, the U.S. military and defense budget topped $1 trillion for the first time ever, after Congress adopted a $150 billion supplemental funding bill that added the initial $892.6 billion appropriation they had previously approved. The budget revealed by the Trump White House on Friday only includes top line number, with the Pentagon expected to provide a more detailed breakdown on April 21.
Still, the increase in military spending is likely to include $185 billion for President Trump’s Golden Dome missile defense system, as well as significant allocations of money for replenishing munition stockpiles that have been nearly depleted through the former Biden government’s transfer of weapons to Ukraine and the ongoing war with the Islamic Republic of Iran. In addition, the budget is expected to include significant appropriations for new warship construction, including the Trump-class battleship—a U.S. Navy guided-missile vessel.
The Trump White House is pushing Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill to adopt around $350 to $500 billion of the $1.5 trillion proposal through the use of the budget reconciliation process. This likely means that the current plan to fund detention and deportation operations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through reconciliation will be folded into the military reconciliation plan.
Congressional rules prohibit the use of reconciliation more than twice per Congress, though some experts contend there are mechanisms that allow it to be used a third time.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Venezuelan man has been charged with attempted murder following a throat-slashing incident, raising fears of a potential serial killer copycat.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ruben Guanipa Ramirez, 26, and an unidentified male victim.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred at a remote beach in Suffolk County, New York.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The evidence recovered from his vehicle raises serious questions about what he intended that night.” – Ray Tierney
🎯IMPACT: The incident fuels concerns of a copycat crime linked to the Gilgo Beach serial killer case.
IN FULL
New York prosecutors have charged 26-year-old Venezuelan national Ruben Guanipa Ramirez with attempted murder in an incident that has raised concerns about a possible copycat attack modeled after alleged Gilgo Beach serial killer Rex Heuermann. According to the authorities, Ramirez drove a man to an isolated beach, then attacked him from behind with a knife. The victim was smothered with a rag, stabbed on the left side, and an attempt was made to slash his throat.
“During the altercation, the victim sustained defensive wounds to his hands but was able to wrestle the knife away from Ramirez,” Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney’s office said in a statement. The victim then took control of Ramirez’s car, called 911, and drove himself to a friend’s apartment in Queens, where he was met by New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers and received medical care.
A search of Ramirez’s vehicle turned up knives, rope, duct tape, and a “large-wheeled bag,” items that have prompted serious alarm. Although no direct connection to the Gilgo Beach case has been confirmed, retired NYPD sergeant Joseph Giacalone, former head of the Bronx Cold Case Unit, highlighted disturbing parallels. “Was this a copycat crime… related to what is happening with Rex Heuermann in the news?” he asked. “They need to take a long, hard look at this guy.”
Giacalone pointed out that the recovered items were especially troubling, noting that Heuermann’s alleged victims had been bound with duct tape and wrapped in burlap or plastic, with some dismembered.
Ramirez is being held at Suffolk County Jail—the same facility housing Heuermann. If convicted, the Venezuelan could face up to 25 years in prison.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Florida and Mississippi have enacted measures requiring proof of citizenship to vote.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Officials in Florida and Mississippi, voters in both states.
📍WHEN & WHERE: April 2, 2026, in the states of Florida and Mississippi.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This is another win for election integrity in Mississippi (and America),” said Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves.
🎯IMPACT: These measures aim to prevent voter fraud and ensure election integrity, aligning with reforms pursued by President Donald J. Trump.
IN FULL
Florida and Mississippi have passed strict measures requiring proof of citizenship in order to vote. Florida’s new measures require potential voters to provide a birth certificate, naturalization certificate, or passport. Those seeking to vote must also match their citizenship status with the status shown on their driver’s license. Similarly, Mississippi’s new measures compel electoral officials to check if those registering to vote have driver’s license numbers on their voter application. Mississippi’s law also mandates annual checks of the voter roll against a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) database to flag any potential voter fraud.
“This is another win for election integrity in Mississippi (and America),” Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves (R) said on X (formerly Twitter), adding: “We will continue to do everything in our power to make it infinitely harder—with a goal to make it impossible—to cheat in our elections!”
Florida and Mississippi are among four Republican-controlled states, along with South Dakota and Utah, that have enacted proof-of-citizenship measures this year. These measures reflect election integrity reforms demanded by President Donald J. Trump, such as requiring a birth certificate, naturalization certificate, or passport.
President Trump has also issued an executive order to reform mail-in ballot voting, which is facing obstruction from Democrat lawmakers, left-wing activists, and liberal judges.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Democrat lawmakers are retracting their support for the Laken Riley Act, backed by President Donald J. Trump, as they face primary pressure from the pro-illegal immigrant far left.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Representative Angie Craig (D-MN), Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Rep. April McClain Delaney (D-MD), and Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-CT) are among those disavowing the law.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The disavowals are occurring in 2026 as the party prepares for internal primaries.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I regret my vote,” wrote Rep. Angie Craig in a local newspaper.
🎯IMPACT: The shift in stance reflects the growing influence of the far left in the Democrats’ internal party dynamics.
IN FULL
As the Democratic Party faces internal primary contests, several of its lawmakers have begun to distance themselves from the Laken Riley Act, a law championed by President Donald J. Trump that mandates the detention of non-citizens arrested for various crimes committed within the United States. The Act was passed with some Democrat support in late January 2025, following the murder of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old university student from the state of Georgia, by Venezuelan illegal immigrant José Antonio Ibarra. At the time of the murder, he was at large despite having previously been charged with “acting in a manner to injure a child less than 17 and a motor vehicle license violation.”
Representative Angie Craig of Minnesota, facing criticism from a progressive opponent in the race for the Democrat Senate nomination in Minnesota, said of her prior support for the Act, “I regret my vote.” Joining Craig in retracting support are Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), Rep. April McClain Delaney (D-MD), and Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-CT), all of whom have faced increasing pressure from leftist factions within their party.
Ibarra was convicted of both felony and malicious murder, kidnapping with bodily injury, aggravated battery and aggravated assault with intent to rape, false imprisonment, hindering an emergency phone call, concealing the death of another person, and criminal invasion of privacy.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States is in talks with Denmark to expand its military presence in Greenland.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The United States, Denmark, Greenland, and General Gregory Guillot, head of U.S. Northern Command.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Negotiations are ongoing as of April 2026, involving sites at Narsarsuaq and Kangerlussuag in southern and western Greenland, respectively.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m working with our department and others to try to develop more ports, more airfields, which leads to more options for our secretary and for the president, should we need them up in the Arctic.” – Gen Gregory Guillot
🎯IMPACT: Potential restoration and expansion of several U.S. bases in Greenland, strengthening the U.S. in the High North.
IN FULL
The United States is in talks with Denmark to establish three new military bases in Greenland. According to U.S. Northern Command, the U.S. intends to develop bases near Narsarsuaq, situated at Greenland’s southern tip, and Kangerlussuaq, situated on Greenland’s western coast. These talks involve the potential development of airfields and ports at three sites, including two abandoned former U.S. bases.
“I’m working with our department and others to try to develop more ports, more airfields, which leads to more options for our Secretary and for the President,” General Gregory Guillot, head of U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM), told a congressional hearing last month. Under the 1951 U.S-Denmark Defense Agreement, the U.S. is permitted to establish and expand military sites in Greenland.
These talks represent the first major step towards increasing U.S. presence in Greenland since President Donald J. Trumpagreed on a new framework with NATO earlier this year. The new framework covered defense cooperation between the U.S. and Denmark, as well as rights to rare-earth minerals.
The Trump administration has repeatedly expressed a desire to acquire Greenland from Denmark. “For the purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,” Trump said.
According to U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, despite vocal public opposition from Europe, the U.S. has received far greater concessions on Greenland in private from European leaders.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has permanently blocked Kentucky’s policy of granting in-state tuition to illegal immigrants, ruling it violates U.S. law.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman (R), and the Trump administration.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued earlier this week in Kentucky following a months-long legal challenge.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Federal law is clear: illegal immigrants don’t get preferential treatment at Kentucky’s public universities, and Kentucky taxpayers certainly shouldn’t be footing the bill.” – Russell Coleman
🎯IMPACT: Kentucky’s higher education system must end in-state tuition discounts for illegal immigrants, ensuring compliance with federal law.
IN FULL
A federal judge has ruled against Kentucky‘s policy of granting in-state tuition to illegal immigrants, declaring it unlawful under federal statute. U.S. District Court Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove—a Bush appointee—issued the decision, permanently blocking the state’s tuition law on the grounds it violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
The ruling follows a legal challenge by Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman (R) and the Trump administration, who argued the policy unlawfully provided benefits to migrants in the country illegally. Federal law states that “an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a state for any post-secondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit … without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.”
“Federal law is clear: illegal immigrants don’t get preferential treatment at Kentucky’s public universities, and Kentucky taxpayers certainly shouldn’t be footing the bill. As Kentucky’s chief law officer, I was proud to join the Trump Administration to make sure our Commonwealth is upholding federal law and fundamental fairness for American citizens,” Coleman stated regarding the ruling, adding: “We’ll continue focusing on helping Kentucky students reach for their full potential.”
The lawsuit initially named Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D) as a defendant. However, Beshear’s office clarified that the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education (KCPE), which enforced the regulation, operates independently. Although the KCPE agreed with the Trump administration that the regulation was preempted, the court found it necessary to issue a ruling on the matter’s constitutionality.
Judge Van Tatenhove’s 22-page decision noted that states can extend certain benefits to illegal immigrants but must do so through laws passed by legislatures, not through agency-based regulations. The court’s ruling also highlighted a February 2025 Executive Order signed by President Donald J. Trump, aimed at ending taxpayer subsidization of open borders, as a factor influencing the decision.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A coalition of leftist organizations filed a lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump’s executive order on mail-in ballot reform.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the NAACP, the Brennan Center for Justice, and others.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The executive order was signed on Tuesday, with the lawsuit filed on Thursday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “[The order is] a recipe for chaos and ultimately disenfranchisement,” alleged Davin Rosborough of the ACLU.
🎯IMPACT: The coalition aims to overturn the executive order through court challenges, undermining Trump’s efforts to improve election security.
IN FULL
A coalition of leftist organizations is launching a lawfare campaign against President Donald J. Trump’s recent executive order on mail-in ballots and combating electoral fraud. “It’s a recipe for chaos and ultimately disenfranchisement,” alleged Davin Rosborough, Deputy Director of the Voting Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
On Thursday, the coalition of activist groups sued over the President’s latest executive order, signed on Tuesday, which instructs the federal government to compile a national list of citizens eligible to vote, strengthening election integrity. The groups hope to overturn these reforms via the courts.
Organizations preparing for lawfare against the President include national and Massachusetts chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Brennan Center for Justice, the League of Women Voters, as well as Asian American Advancing Justice (AAJC) and the Delta Sigma Theta Sorority.
Democrat-aligned judges have sought to quash anti-fraud reforms in the past, such as a Biden-appointed judge in Washington state, who blocked reforms in late January that would set Election Day as the deadline for mail-in ballots. The Supreme Court, however, permitted legal challenges to mail-in ballots to proceed earlier this year, such as in Illinois, where a law sought to permit the counting of mail-in ballots well after votes were cast.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Over two-thirds of the French population say “anti-white racism” has become a significant problem in their country.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The CSA (Institut d’Études), the French people, and French political parties.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The polling was published on April 2, 2026.
🎯IMPACT: French views on anti-white racism are highly polarized based on political identification; with the far-left rejecting that it exists, while the center-left and political right both acknowledge that it is a problem in France.
IN FULL
Over two-thirds of the French population say “anti-white racism” has become a significant problem in their country. According to a new survey conducted by the CSA (Institut d’Études), a prominent French research institute, 67 percent of respondents see discrimination against white people as a reality in modern France.
Notably, French views on anti-white racism are highly polarized based on political identification. The CSA survey found that political leftists overwhelmingly reject the idea that the country has fostered a culture of anti-white discrimination, with 64 percent of voters who affiliate with far-left La France Insoumise (France Unbowed) saying it is not a problem, and 72 percent of Green Party voters denying that anti-white racism exists.
However, on France’s center-left, 52 percent of respondents affiliated with President Emmanuel Macron‘s Renaissance party say anti-white racism exists. Likewise, 51 percent of Socialist Party voters acknowledge that discrimination against whites in France does occur.
Respondents who identify with France’s political right overwhelmingly say they believe anti-white racism is a problem in the country. Eighty-one percent of those affiliated with Les Républicains, a center-right party, say discrimination against white people is a problem, while 91 percent of respondents who support Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party believe anti-white racism exists in France.
The National Pulse reported this past January that French authorities had barred ten members of the British anti-mass migration activist group Raise the Colours from entering or remaining in France, citing their involvement in actions protesting boats along France’s northern coastline carrying illegal immigrants to Britain. In a statement, the French Interior Ministry accused the activists of having carried out “propaganda activities” along the coast.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
