Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Trump Reiterates Need for ‘Complete and Total Control’ of Greenland in Message to Norwegian PM.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump reiterated the need for “total” U.S. control over Greenland in a message to the Prime Minister of Norway.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and various NATO figures.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The text exchange occurred recently, with follow-up meetings planned between NATO and Danish officials.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s statements have intensified debate over U.S. foreign policy under Trump and the NATO alliance.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has reiterated his strong desire for the United States to gain “complete and total control” of Greenland, arguing that global security depends on it in a message to the Prime Minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Støre. “Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?” he demanded, adding: “There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also.”

“I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States,” he continued, concluding: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

Earlier in the message, the U.S. leader had warned, “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.” Prime Minister Støre subsequently complained that an independent committee awards Nobel Prizes, not the Norwegian government.

Støre confirmed receiving the message on Sunday, describing it as a reply to an earlier joint outreach from him and Finnish President Alexander Stubb after they had urged de-escalation amid the Greenland dispute. This followed Trump having threatened to impose a 10 percent tariff on goods from eight NATO allies—including Denmark, Norway, and others—starting February 1, with potential increases to 25 percent by June, unless progress is made toward U.S. acquisition of Greenland.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Foreigners Responsible for Most Train Thefts, Huge Share of Violent and Sexual Crimes.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Data from the British Transport Police (BTP) revealed that foreign nationals accounted for 79 percent of all arrests for theft on British trains in 2025, and 40 percent of all railway arrests overall.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: British Transport Police, the Centre for Migration Control (CMC) think tank, and foreign nationals involved in various offenses.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Data pertains to arrests across England, Wales, and Scotland in 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They have made our trains unsafe. It is the responsibility of any sane government to end immigration and begin a programme of mass deportations to protect the British people,” said Robert Bates, research director at CMC.

🎯IMPACT: The data has prompted calls for stricter immigration policies, with recommendations for immediate deportations of foreign nationals convicted of crimes.

IN FULL

Foreign nationals accounted for a large share of arrests on Britain’s rail network in 2025, according to figures released by the British Transport Police (BTP) following a Freedom of Information request from the Centre for Migration Control (CMC). The data shows that foreign nationals were responsible for 79 percent of all theft arrests on British trains and 40 percent of arrests overall across the railway system.

The CMC said the figures also point to disproportionate involvement by foreign nationals in other serious crimes on the rail network. According to the group’s analysis, foreign nationals made up 40 percent of arrests for drug-related offenses, 37 percent of arrests for sexual offenses, and 36 percent of arrests for violent crime. Overall, they accounted for 37.7 percent of all railway arrests. “We have imported a huge problem,” the CMC said in a post on X.

CMC research director Robert Bates blamed government immigration policy for the trend. “They have made our trains unsafe. It is the responsibility of any sane government to end immigration and begin a programme of mass deportations to protect the British people,” he said. The CMC has also called for the introduction of a visa “red list” barring entry from certain countries whose nations have high rates of criminality, similar to policies implemented by President Donald J. Trump, and for legal changes to ensure foreign nationals convicted of crimes are deported immediately.

The railway data aligns with broader crime statistics that have fueled debate over immigration and public safety. Recent analyses of conviction records indicate that migrants were significantly overrepresented in sexual offense convictions compared with Britons, with foreign nationals estimated to be around 70 percent more likely to be convicted of sex crimes during the early 2020s.

Concerns have also been raised about enforcement, with reports suggesting that staffing shortages and administrative pressures have led to some foreign criminals being wrongly released rather than removed from the country.

Similar patterns have been reported elsewhere in Western Europe. In France, foreigners were responsible for 64 percent of violent crimes on Paris public transport in 2024, with North Africans disproportionately represented. In Germany, foreigners accounted for 59 percent of sexual crimes committed on trains and at train stations in 2024.

Image by Andrew Abbott.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Stuns With Sweeping Greenland Acquisition Tariffs.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Trump announced tariffs on countries obstructing the U.S. purchase of Greenland.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald J. Trump and countries including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Tariffs to begin on February 1st, 2026, with an increase on June 1st, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs.” – Donald J. Trump

🎯IMPACT: Tariffs aimed at compelling a deal for the U.S. purchase of Greenland, citing national security concerns.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has announced new tariffs on several European countries, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland. These tariffs are in response to these nations’ obstruction of the United States’ efforts to purchase Greenland.

The tariffs will start at 10% on February 1st, 2026, and will increase to 25% on June 1st, 2026. Trump argues that these tariffs are necessary to protect global peace and security, as the strategic importance of Greenland is paramount.

“We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration,” Trump stated, emphasizing the need for Denmark to “give back” as world peace is at stake.

The former president also highlighted concerns over other nations, such as China and Russia, expressing interest in Greenland, asserting that only the United States can effectively safeguard this “sacred piece of Land.”

Trump’s statement also mentioned the significant investment in security programs related to “The Golden Dome,” and how acquiring Greenland is crucial for maximizing the potential of these systems. The U.S. remains open to negotiation with Denmark and the other involved nations.

Read the full post here.

show less
show more

Socialist Mayor Hit With Ethics Fine for Concealing $10K Parental Donation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson (D) was fined $250 for failing to disclose over $10,000 in contributions from her parents during her campaign.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, her parents, and the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The fine was issued following her November election victory in Seattle.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Seattle is one of the most expensive cities in the country… I think that a lot of people of my generation… found it very relatable that during this stressful campaign my parents chipped in to help pay for the cost of their granddaughter’s daycare.” – Katie Wilson

🎯IMPACT: The case highlighted potential loopholes in campaign finance laws and resulted in a small fine.

IN FULL

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson (D) was fined $250 by the City of Seattle’s Ethics and Elections Commission after failing to disclose more than $10,000 in financial support from her parents during her mayoral campaign. The commission ruled that the money constituted campaign contributions, even though Wilson said the funds were used to pay for daycare expenses, and required corrective action to bring the campaign into compliance with city election laws.

According to the commission, the penalty was kept low because the issue had not previously arisen in a Seattle municipal campaign. Commission representative Jessica Pisane said, “It’s the first time it has arisen in a City election campaign.”

Following her victory in November, Wilson defended the assistance she received from her parents, saying, “Seattle is one of the most expensive cities in the country, our childcare is off-the-charts expensive and, honestly, I think that a lot of people of my generation, and younger and older, found it very relatable that during this stressful campaign my parents chipped in to help pay for the cost of their granddaughter’s daycare.”

Before entering city politics, Wilson founded the Transit Riders Union. Financial disclosures filed during her campaign showed that she earned between $60,000 and $99,000 annually prior to running for mayor. She also reported additional income from writing as a columnist for left-leaning publications.

Since taking office, Wilson has drawn criticism over several progressive policy positions. She has faced backlash related to public safety after reports that Seattle police officers were being directed to divert many drug abusers away from arrest and toward social service programs, a move critics argue amounts to de facto non-enforcement of drug laws. Wilson’s administration has denied that officers have been told not to make arrests, but the issue has fueled tension with police unions and public safety advocates.

Wilson has also come under national scrutiny following comments about independent journalists reporting on childcare providers in Seattle. After she characterized certain citizen journalists as engaging in harassment, a senior U.S. Justice Department official publicly warned that citizen journalism and asking questions are protected speech under the Constitution.

During her campaign, Wilson supported proposals such as defunding the police and exploring government-run grocery stores, drawing comparisons to other socialist politicians like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

Image by nathantain.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

GOP Advances Ban on Congressional Stock Trading Without a SINGLE Democrat Supporter.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Republican Representative Bryan Steil’s “Stop Insider Trading Act” passed the House Administration Committee without any Democrat support and moves to the House floor.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), Democrat committee members, and other lawmakers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: House Administration Committee markup session on January 14, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The focus of the bill is to prohibit insider trading, not to make elected officials poor.” – Rep. Bryan Steil

🎯IMPACT: The bill aims to restrict insider trading among members of Congress while allowing certain investments.

IN FULL

Representative Bryan Steil (R-WI) advanced his “Stop Insider Trading Act” out of the House Administration Committee without support from a single Democrat, clearing the way for consideration by the full House. The proposal would prohibit members of Congress from purchasing individual stocks and require lawmakers to give seven to 14 days’ notice before selling securities. Investments in index and mutual funds would still be allowed, as would the reinvestment of dividends from previously owned assets.

Democrats claim the bill fails to fully address conflicts of interest arising from lawmakers trading stocks. During a two-hour markup session, Rep. Joe Morelle (D-NY) proposed requiring “Congress and the President and the Vice President” to fully divest from individual securities. Rep. Julie Johnson (D-TX) introduced an amendment mandating complete divestment without exemptions for capital gains taxes.

Steil rejected those proposals, cautioning that mandatory divestment could discourage qualified candidates from seeking office. “Under the amendment offered by our colleague from Texas, that [capital gains tax] would obviously continue to apply, and for some people, that may be a very significant financial impact,” he said. He warned that the added financial burden could cause “some individuals… to not come to Congress—and not because they did anything wrong, but because they had a successful private sector career.”

Democrats attempted one final change when Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA) introduced an amendment to prohibit the reinvestment of dividends. Republicans voted it down, with Steil arguing that dividend income does not present insider trading risks. “Those dividends are structured within the company with advanced notice, outside of the control of any given member. It does not carry the risk of insider trading,” he said. He added, “The focus of the bill is to prohibit insider trading, not to make elected officials poor.”

Despite the disagreement over Steil’s bill, concerns about insider trading in Congress have been acknowledged across party lines. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has previously warned that such practices undermine public trust, stating that insider trading occurs among Democrats as well as Republicans and contributes to widespread cynicism about Washington.

Image by Ted Eytan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Feds Offer $15K for Capture of Illegal Who Rammed ICE Agents.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An illegal immigrant allegedly rammed his car into U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) vehicles, injuring multiple agents during a traffic stop in Dallas, Texas, with federal officials offering a reward for information leading to his arrest.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jerson Lopez-Sanchez, a 28-year-old Honduran national, ICE agents, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and federal authorities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on December 1, 2025, in Dallas, Texas, with the indictment filed on January 14, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The ramming was so violent that it deployed all the airbags in the vehicle,” said Jay Combs, interim U.S. attorney for the district.

🎯IMPACT: Multiple ICE agents were injured, and the FBI is offering a $15,000 reward for information leading to Lopez-Sanchez’s arrest.

IN FULL

Federal authorities are searching for Jerson Lopez-Sanchez, a 28-year-old illegal migrant from Honduras, after he allegedly rammed his vehicle into U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) vehicles during a traffic stop in Dallas on December 1, 2025. The attack injured multiple agents, according to federal prosecutors. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is offering a reward of up to $15,000 for information leading to the arrest of Lopez-Sanchez, who remains at large.

Lopez-Sanchez reportedly attempted to flee when his Chevy Silverado was surrounded by three ICE vehicles. He reversed into a law enforcement Jeep, injuring an ICE agent who had one leg outside the vehicle. Prosecutors allege he then drove around the other law enforcement vehicles to escape.

According to the federal indictment, Lopez-Sanchez later rammed into a Chrysler van operated by ICE agents, injuring two more agents inside. Photos in the indictment reveal severe damage to the van, including a smashed front and smoke coming from the engine block. “The ramming was so violent that it deployed all the airbags in the vehicle,” said Jay Combs, interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas.

The chase continued for 10 minutes before the truck stopped on a median, and all five occupants fled on foot. While three were detained with the help of civilians, Lopez-Sanchez remains at large. He faces three counts of assaulting ICE agents and could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Dismisses Insurrection Act Use… For Now.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump addressed the potential use of the Insurrection Act amid ongoing clashes in Minneapolis, Minnesota, involving federal immigration authorities.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, federal immigration authorities, local officials in Minnesota, and Republican senators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Friday, during Trump’s departure from the White House, with events escalating in Minneapolis.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If, and when, I am forced to act, it will be solved, QUICKLY and EFFECTIVELY!” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The Insurrection Act remains a contentious option, with Republican leaders expressing reservations and urging reliance on local law enforcement.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump stated on Friday that there was no immediate need to invoke the Insurrection Act, despite ongoing unrest in Minneapolis where federal immigration authorities have faced violent confrontations. The 1807 law, which Trump had previously threatened to use, allows the president to deploy the military to enforce federal laws and suppress rebellions.

“I believe it was Bush, the elder Bush, he used it, I think 28 times,” Trump told reporters while departing the White House. He added, “It’s been used a lot. And if I needed it, I’d use it. I don’t think there’s any reason right now to use it, but if I needed it, I’d use it. It’s very powerful.”

The law was last invoked during the 1992 Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers in the Rodney King case. However, some Republican leaders have expressed hesitation about its use. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) remarked, “Hopefully the local officials working with not only the federal law enforcement, ICE and other agencies, but also the local law enforcement officials will be able to settle things down.”

Trump, in a Truth Social post, referred to those confronting federal officers as “Troublemakers, Agitators, and Insurrectionists,” and accused local leaders of losing control, adding: “The Governor and Mayor don’t know what to do, they have totally lost control,” he wrote. “If, and when, I am forced to act, it will be solved, QUICKLY and EFFECTIVELY!”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Mexico Claims Successful Cartel Crackdown as Trump Threatens Intervention.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum stated that efforts to combat cartels and migration are yielding “compelling results” amid U.S. pressure for tougher action and threats of military intervention on Mexican soil.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Mexican Foreign Secretary Juan Ramón de la Fuente.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Statements were made during Sheinbaum’s press briefing on Friday, following a joint U.S.-Mexico call on Thursday and a phone conversation between Sheinbaum and Trump on Monday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There are very compelling results from the joint cooperation and the work that Mexico has been doing.” – Claudia Sheinbaum.

🎯IMPACT: The U.S. is working to address cartels and illegal immigration, but tensions with the Mexican government remain over sovereignty.

IN FULL

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum claimed her administration has made progress in combating organized crime and reducing northward illegal immigration during a press briefing on January 16, emphasizing cooperation with the United States. Her remarks come after President J. Donald Trump recently suggested taking direct action against Mexican cartels on Mexican soil, saying, “We’ve knocked out 97 percent of the drugs coming in by water. And we are going to start now hitting land, with regard to the cartels.”

Sheinbaum pointed to a reduction in homicides, decreased fentanyl seizures at the U.S. border, and a major methamphetamine seizure earlier in the week as evidence of progress. “There are very compelling results from the joint cooperation and the work that Mexico has been doing,” she said.

A joint statement issued Thursday night by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Mexican Foreign Secretary Juan Ramón de la Fuente emphasized the need for further efforts to address shared security threats. The statement followed a phone call between Sheinbaum and Trump, which the Mexican president described as “very good.” She said Mexico’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity were respected” and added, “We told him, so far it’s going very well, it’s not necessary, and furthermore, there is Mexico’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and he understood.”

Sheinbaum also called on the United States to address its domestic drug consumption crisis and curb the flow of firearms into Mexico from the U.S. “The other side also has to do its part. This consumption crisis they have over there also has to be addressed from a public health perspective, through education campaigns,” she said.

Mexico has one of the strictest gun control regimes in the world, but officials say most weapons seized at crime scenes come from the United States, often through illegal purchases and smuggling. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Mexico’s lawsuit seeking damages from U.S. gun companies, ruling that it did not meet the legal standards required under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Tensions have also arisen over the U.S. designation of certain cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, which Mexico protested, warning that any action violating its territorial sovereignty would be unacceptable.

Image via Mexico City Government.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Threatens Tariff Hike on Nations Opposing U.S. on Greenland.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump suggested imposing tariffs on countries that oppose his administration’s efforts to acquire Greenland.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, and other leaders from Denmark and Greenland.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments were made during a rural health care roundtable on Friday, following meetings earlier in the week between U.S. and Danish officials.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: Denmark and Greenland have rejected the acquisition, viewing it as a threat to NATO alliance integrity. Military exercises in Greenland have increased, and U.S.-Danish tensions remain high.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump stated on Friday that he is considering imposing tariffs on countries that oppose his administration’s plans to acquire Greenland. Speaking during a rural health care roundtable, he emphasized the importance of Greenland for U.S. national security, saying, “I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security.” The America First leader did not specify a tariff rate during his remarks, although he had previously mentioned 25 percent tariffs in other contexts.

The comments follow a meeting earlier in the week between Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland. Denmark had requested the meeting to ease tensions over the U.S.’s interest in Greenland, but the rhetoric has continued. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen described the notion of disregarding Denmark’s territorial integrity as “totally unacceptable.”

Denmark has warned that a military takeover of Greenland would be considered a threat to NATO. Non-U.S. NATO countries have already begun deploying small numbers of troops to Greenland, ostensibly for military exercises, further escalating the situation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Zelensky Announces State of Emergency as Grid Fails and Temperatures Plummet.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Ukraine has declared a state of emergency in its energy sector amid ongoing Russian attacks on power infrastructure, leaving many regions without electricity or heating during subzero winter conditions.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Energy Minister Denys Shmyhal, Kiev Mayor Vitali Klitschko, and Russian forces targeting energy facilities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The state of emergency was introduced on Wednesday, with the most severe impacts reported in Kiev, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkov, Odessa, and frontline towns.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is not a single power plant left in Ukraine that the enemy has not attacked,” said Energy Minister Denys Shmyhal.

🎯IMPACT: Thousands of Ukrainians face harsh winter conditions without adequate heating or electricity, with aid groups warning of “severe consequences” for families unable to afford basic necessities.

IN FULL

Ukraine has declared a state of emergency in its energy sector as continued Russian strikes on power infrastructure have pushed the system to the brink during one of the coldest periods of winter. Energy Minister Denys Shmyhal told parliament the situation is “very difficult,” saying there is “not a single power plant left in Ukraine that the enemy has not attacked.” He said winter preparations had failed in several regions, including Kiev, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkov, and Odessa, leaving thousands of households without reliable heat or electricity.

President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Moscow of deliberately exploiting extreme weather conditions, with temperatures dropping to around −20°C (-4°F), to intensify the impact of its attacks. “The consequences of Russian strikes and deteriorating weather conditions are severe,” Zelensky said. He explained that the state of emergency was introduced to give authorities “more options and flexibility” to manage the crisis, including importing electricity, expanding warming centres, and accelerating repairs.

Humanitarian organisations have warned that civilians are facing growing hardship as energy shortages combine with rising living costs. Jaime Wah, Deputy Head of Delegation in Ukraine for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, said many families have exhausted their savings and are being forced to choose between basic necessities. “These are choices no one should make,” Wah said.

In Kiev, Mayor Vitali Klitschko urged residents who are able to leave the capital to do so in order to reduce pressure on strained services. At the same time, he rejected criticism from Zelensky over the city’s response to the crisis. Klitschko said heating had been restored to most affected apartment buildings and that support and warming centres were operating around the clock. “Such statements, first of all, undermine the dedicated work of thousands of people, professionals,” he complained on Telegram.

The energy emergency comes as fighting continues across the country, with Russia intensifying missile and drone attacks on major cities. On the diplomatic front, tensions remain high, with President Donald J. Trump recently accusing Zelensky of delaying peace talks, a claim the Ukrainian leader has rejected.

Ukraine has also denied Russian allegations of a drone attack on President Vladimir Putin’s residence, calling them false and potentially aimed at justifying further escalation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more